I totally get the reasoning here but I'm not sure we want to 'magically' modify names of plugins. I'm curious if anybody else has thoughts on this.

(To be clear: I don't think I personally care but I'd like to hear what other users think before merging this in)

jah i tend to agree - with such a large mass of bash scripting I think we'd want to keep the "magic" to a minimum

You could ask people for confirmation and respect the --force flag.

@josegonzalez ask for confirmation of installation without the dokku- part? What the --force flag will do?

A few things:

• We should be able to specify the plugin name.
• If we detect a dokku- prefix, we should ask the user to confirm that they want to remove it.
• If the user does dokku --force plugin:install whatever, then it will remove the prefix without prompting the user.

Ok so plugin:install should accept a second argument that specify the local name of the plugin to be installed, right?
If user provides this second argument, do we strip the dokku- prefix if it has it? I think we shouldn’t in this case.
And then --force should do nothing when user provide the second argument in this case.

We don't strip if they provide a name.

I'd prefer if we didn't prompt by default. Sounds annoying

Okay, fine by me, strip by default unless someone forces a name.

Ok, so --force is not needed anymore then :)

Updated :)

Seems legit!