这是indexloc提供的服务,不要输入任何密码
Skip to content

feature: improve default response status flow for head method #830

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

hiddenmarten
Copy link
Contributor

Implemented suggestion from an issue.

@hiddenmarten hiddenmarten changed the title feature: improve default response status flow feature: improve default response status flow for head method May 26, 2025
Copy link
Owner

@danielgtaylor danielgtaylor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the delay! LGTM thank you! 👍

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.04%. Comparing base (2c9df7e) to head (02cf01c).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #830   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.04%   93.04%           
=======================================
  Files          23       23           
  Lines        5390     5392    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits         5015     5017    +2     
  Misses        319      319           
  Partials       56       56           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@danielgtaylor danielgtaylor merged commit 2671cf1 into danielgtaylor:main Jun 18, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants