fix: doc comments for TestAPI functions #644
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (7)humatest/humatest.go (7)
The updated example properly demonstrates how to create a request body from a JSON string literal using
The example correctly demonstrates the same pattern using
The example correctly uses
The example correctly demonstrates the same pattern using
The example correctly uses
The example correctly demonstrates the same pattern using Line range hint The ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more information about the implementation to verify the complete support. Implementation fully supports documented examples and provides consistent behavior The verification confirms that:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Verify that strings.NewReader is used consistently across all examples
rg -U 'strings\.NewReader\(`\{.*?\}`\)' humatest/humatest.go
Length of output: 439 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of all HTTP methods to verify consistent handling
ast-grep --pattern 'func (a *testAPI) $_(ctx context.Context, path string, args ...any) *httptest.ResponseRecorder {
$$$
}'
# Also check for non-context versions
ast-grep --pattern 'func (a *testAPI) $_(path string, args ...any) *httptest.ResponseRecorder {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2848 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #644 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 92.70% 92.70%
=======================================
Files 22 22
Lines 4879 4879
=======================================
Hits 4523 4523
Misses 308 308
Partials 48 48 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
The PR corrects documentation comments for functions from the
TestAPIinterface.bytes.NewReader(`{"foo": "bar"}`))does not compile, must bebytes.NewReader([]byte(`{"foo": "bar"}`)))orstrings.NewReader(`{"foo": "bar"}`)).Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Documentation