这是indexloc提供的服务，不要输入任何密码
Skip to content

add NewErrorWithContext #578

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

add NewErrorWithContext #578

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

@nunoo
Copy link
Contributor

@nunoo nunoo commented Sep 18, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced error handling with the introduction of contextual information in error responses.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved error reporting mechanism for better debugging and logging.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new function, NewErrorWithContext, in error.go, which enhances error handling by allowing contextual information to be included when creating a StatusError. The existing WriteErr function is modified to utilize this new function instead of the previous NewError, ensuring that error responses carry relevant context for better debugging and logging.

Changes

Files Change Summary
error.go Added NewErrorWithContext function to include context in StatusError. Modified WriteErr to use NewErrorWithContext instead of NewError.

Poem

In the meadow where errors play,
A new context joins the fray.
With each hop, the logs will sing,
Of clearer paths and brighter spring.
So let us cheer, with joy and glee,
For errors wrapped in context, free! 🐇✨

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.77%. Comparing base (5c12ecb) to head (7adc76f).
Report is 22 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #578      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.74%   92.77%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          22       22              
  Lines        3872     3888      +16     
==========================================
+ Hits         3591     3607      +16     
  Misses        236      236              
  Partials       45       45

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Sep 19, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
error.go (1)

251-253: Add a comment to clarify the purpose of the context parameter.

The NewErrorWithContext function includes a Context parameter, but it is not used within the function body. This could lead to confusion for developers using this function.

Consider adding a comment to clarify the purpose of the context parameter and its intended usage. For example:

// NewErrorWithContext creates a new instance of an error model with the given context, status code,
// message, and optional error details. The context is currently unused but is included for future
// extensibility.
var NewErrorWithContext = func(_ Context, status int, msg string, errs ...error) StatusError {
	return NewError(status, msg, errs...)
}
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3649df3 and 7adc76f.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • error.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
error.go (1)

259-259: LGTM!

The change to utilize NewErrorWithContext in the WriteErr function is a good improvement. By passing the ctx parameter to NewErrorWithContext, the error is now associated with its respective context. This enhances the error reporting mechanism and can provide valuable contextual information for debugging and logging purposes.

@nunoo nunoo closed this Sep 19, 2024
@nunoo nunoo deleted the nunoo-new-error-context branch September 19, 2024 17:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@nunoo