这是indexloc提供的服务,不要输入任何密码
Skip to content

Conversation

@mbargull
Copy link
Member

gh-7689, courtesy of @fabioz, targeted at master.
For the test case given in #7689 (comment), this takes about 4% (8.6 s vs. 9.0 s) less overall time when excluding repodata download, i.e., setting local_repodata_ttl to some high value.

@mbargull mbargull requested a review from a team as a code owner August 30, 2018 18:37
@kalefranz kalefranz added this to the 4.6.0 milestone Sep 4, 2018
@kalefranz
Copy link
Contributor

I believe this is safe to merge. I don't think the test failure is related and is fixed in master.

@kalefranz kalefranz merged commit 77c5d2a into conda:master Sep 4, 2018
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 1, 2021

Hi there, thank you for your contribution to Conda!

This pull request has been automatically locked since it has not had recent activity after it was closed.

Please open a new issue or pull request if needed.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked [bot] locked due to inactivity label Sep 1, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 1, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

locked [bot] locked due to inactivity

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants