这是indexloc提供的服务,不要输入任何密码
Skip to content

refactor(common): convert nav-button to TypeScript #3966

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

devin-ai-integration[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Convert nav-button to TypeScript

This PR converts the files in src/elements/common/nav-button to TypeScript:

  • NavButton.js -> NavButton.tsx
  • BackButton.js -> BackButton.tsx
  • index.js -> index.ts

Changes

  • Renamed files from .js to .ts/.tsx
  • Renamed Props types to ComponentProps and exported as interfaces
  • Removed Flow header comments
  • Fixed TypeScript type errors

Link to Devin run: https://app.devin.ai/sessions/11a19ecf27cd4dbf856d59a802788239

Copy link
Contributor Author

🤖 Devin AI Engineer

I'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know:

✅ I will automatically:

  • Address comments on this PR. Add "(aside)" to your comment to have me ignore it.
  • Look at CI failures and help fix them

Note: I can only respond to comments from users who have write access to this repository.

⚙️ Control Options:

  • Disable automatic comment and CI monitoring

Copy link
Contributor

@tjuanitas tjuanitas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You need to create .js.flow files for these files

Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, the type from 'react-router' is the correct type to use here.

The type from 'react-router' provides the interface for the object that contains route parameters. It includes properties like , , , and , which are used in the function.

In the original Flow code, the type was defined inline, but in TypeScript, we can import the standard type definition from 'react-router'. This is more maintainable and ensures type consistency with the rest of the React Router ecosystem.

The type is used in conjunction with the type from 'history' to provide the parameters for the function, which determines whether a navigation link should be displayed as active.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, the match type from 'react-router' is the correct type to use here.

The match type from 'react-router' provides the interface for the object that contains route parameters. It includes properties like path, url, isExact, and params, which are used in the isActive function.

In the original Flow code, the Match type was defined inline, but in TypeScript, we can import the standard type definition from 'react-router'. This is more maintainable and ensures type consistency with the rest of the React Router ecosystem.

The match type is used in conjunction with the Location type from 'history' to provide the parameters for the isActive function, which determines whether a navigation link should be displayed as active.

Copy link
Contributor Author

The current import of Location from 'history' is correct.

In React Router v5 (which this project appears to be using based on the imports), the Location type is defined in the 'history' package, which is a dependency of 'react-router'. The 'react-router' package uses this type but doesn't re-export it.

The match type, on the other hand, is defined directly in 'react-router', which is why we import it from there.

This approach follows the pattern used in the React Router documentation and ensures we're importing types from their source packages, which is a good practice for TypeScript projects.

@tjuanitas
Copy link
Contributor

revert this commit: 00099e44e038f9add60fe7a74406e189f0caa9fe

Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing due to inactivity.

@tjuanitas tjuanitas reopened this May 22, 2025
@tjuanitas tjuanitas marked this pull request as ready for review May 22, 2025 01:27
@tjuanitas tjuanitas requested a review from a team as a code owner May 22, 2025 01:27
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 22, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Join our Discord community for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@tjuanitas
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai please compare the typescript files in this PR and the equivalent Flow files and confirm there are no changes in logic. In addition, please create a summary table that includes all the differences between the files.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 22, 2025

You are on the CodeRabbit Free Plan. In order to use the Chat feature, please upgrade to CodeRabbit Pro.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants