This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 2, 2018. It is now read-only.

Description
Currently they conflict with type names in other assemblies and/or have super generic names (thus making the names somewhat useless). We should always give these types reasonably unique names describing not only what they extend, but what type of functionality they add.
Proposal:
- Rename this to
ServiceCollectionContainerBuilderExtensions
- Rename this to
ServiceCollectionServiceExtensions
- Rename this to
ServiceCollectionDescriptorExtensions
- Rename this to
ServiceProviderServiceExtensions