这是indexloc提供的服务,不要输入任何密码
Skip to content

Conversation

@toji
Copy link
Member

@toji toji commented Aug 23, 2020

Fixes #767, I believe.

Fixes one minor null/undefined mismatch, allows the pipeline indexFormat to be undefined, and specifies that strip topologies must have a defined index format while non-strip topologies must have an undefined index format.

BTW: Giving the "switch" statement in bikeshed a try here, let me know what you think of the formatting! I feel like it helps readability in this case.


Preview | Diff

@toji toji requested review from kainino0x and kvark August 23, 2020 21:54
@tidoust
Copy link
Contributor

tidoust commented Aug 24, 2020

Note the IPR "red flag" can be ignored and the pull request merged without problem.

The IPR bot complains about the pull request because:

  1. @toji is not a CG participant. And
  2. I enabled the IPR bot in CG mode for now. Ironically, I did that precisely to avoid false positives while main companies progressively join the WG ;-). And
  3. The Community License Agreement (CLA) applies to individuals, and not organizations. The fact that Google is otherwise represented in the CG does not matter.

The IPR bot would not have complained in WG mode since Google already joined the WG, and since the W3C Patent Policy applies at the organizational level. In short, the pull request is covered by the W3C Patent Policy.

@toji
Copy link
Member Author

toji commented Aug 24, 2020

For what it's worth, I've sent off the request to join the CG to avoid this in the future. Thanks!

@toji toji force-pushed the strip-index-validation branch from bb4b73f to 215d567 Compare August 24, 2020 17:34
@toji
Copy link
Member Author

toji commented Aug 24, 2020

Rebased and the travis issue went away, plus the IPR check is passing too now!

@kainino0x kainino0x merged commit 25b8faa into gpuweb:main Aug 26, 2020
@toji toji deleted the strip-index-validation branch August 26, 2020 23:49
ben-clayton pushed a commit to ben-clayton/gpuweb that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2022
* Update some setup code with the addition of new message-passing test

* Factor out more common code

* Refactor result shader generation

* Parameterize all tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

IndexFormat part of pipeline?

5 participants