feat: add base64 encoded private key support #377
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Miablo
approved these changes
Jul 24, 2025
Contributor
Author
|
Encountering some issues locally with |
10deedd to
893e2ec
Compare
e9e03c9
into
github-community-projects:main
6 of 12 checks passed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request
Proposed Changes
This change adds support for a base64 encoded private key which helps to avoid issues with retrieving, setting, and passing around an environment variable value that contains newlines which may be required for some enterprise secret management strategies. The base64 parsing was made conditional to avoid breaking existing setups while allowing the option for those that might need it.
Readiness Checklist
Author/Contributor
npm run lintand fix any linting issues that have been introducednpm run testand run tests@jeffrey-luszczReviewer
bug,documentation,enhancement,infrastructure,maintenance, orbreaking