You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As noted in #14799, the calculation results when using the Wide Band Model depend on the PATH_LENGTH.
Appendix C in the Tech. Ref. Guide states that when the number of bands is more than one, only the Planck mean coefficient, which is independent of the PATH_LENGTH, is used in calculating the absorption coefficient. As far as I understand, the Wide Band Model implies the case of N==6.
I took a quick look at the implementation of the absorption coefficient calculation in radi.f90.
CALL SUB_RADCAL(AMEAN,AP0,RADIANCE,TRANSMISSIVITY)
IF (NSB==1 .AND. PATH_LENGTH > 0.0_EB) THEN
RADCAL_SPECIES2KAPPA(NS,J,K,1) = MIN(AMEAN,AP0)
ELSE
RADCAL_SPECIES2KAPPA(NS,J,K,IBND) = AMEAN/BBF
ENDIF
As far as I understand, AMEAN is EFFECTIVE_ABSORPTION (or path mean), not PLANCK_MEAN_ABSORPTION.
This doesn't seem to match what is written in the manual for the NSB > 1 case.