这是indexloc提供的服务,不要输入任何密码
Skip to content

Conversation

@K-Mistele
Copy link
Contributor

@K-Mistele K-Mistele commented Oct 29, 2025

What problem(s) was I solving?

What user-facing changes did I ship?

How I implemented it

How to verify it

  • I have ensured make check test passes

Description for the changelog

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)


Important

Disables nightly build schedule in release-macos.yml by commenting out the cron schedule.

  • Behavior:
    • Disables nightly build schedule in release-macos.yml by commenting out the cron schedule.
  • Misc:
    • Adjusts indentation and formatting in release-macos.yml.

This description was created by Ellipsis for fa06ddc. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to fa06ddc in 1 minute and 39 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 31 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 2 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. .github/workflows/release-macos.yml:4
  • Draft comment:
    Disabled schedule trigger: Confirm that commenting out the schedule is the intended way to disable nightly releases. If nightly builds are no longer needed, consider removing related conditional logic in the release script for clarity.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% This comment clearly violates multiple rules. First, it starts with "Confirm that..." which is explicitly called out in the rules as a pattern that indicates the comment is likely not useful. The rules state: "Do NOT ask the PR author to confirm their intention, to explain, to double-check things, to ensure the behavior is intended." Second, the suggestion to "consider removing related conditional logic" is speculative - the author may have intentionally kept the nightly build logic for manual workflow_dispatch triggers. The change only comments out the automatic schedule, but nightly builds can still be triggered manually. There's no strong evidence that the conditional logic should be removed. Could the author have accidentally left the schedule commented out when they meant to remove it entirely? Perhaps there's a broader refactoring plan where nightly builds are being phased out completely, and this comment is trying to be helpful by pointing out leftover logic. Even if there's a broader plan to phase out nightly builds, the comment is still asking for confirmation rather than pointing out a definite issue. The workflow still supports manual nightly builds via workflow_dispatch, so the conditional logic is still functional and needed. The comment doesn't provide strong evidence that anything is wrong - it's purely asking the author to confirm and consider changes. This comment should be deleted. It explicitly asks the author to "confirm" their intention, which violates the rules. It also makes a speculative suggestion to "consider removing" logic without strong evidence that it's incorrect or problematic. The nightly build logic is still used for manual workflow_dispatch triggers.
2. .github/workflows/release-macos.yml:18
  • Draft comment:
    Changing default release_version from '' to "" is fine; ensure consistency across workflows.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

Workflow ID: wflow_twplzdVmvLpkT2pt

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

@K-Mistele K-Mistele merged commit 4a8b9b8 into main Oct 29, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants