based on the example directly #115
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed everything up to 36b5f2d in 1 minute and 29 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
45lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. .github/workflows/claude-auto-review.yml:10
- Draft comment:
Review if 'id-token: write' is essential. Use least privilege if possible. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The comment raises a valid security concern about following the principle of least privilege. However, without knowing the internal requirements of the claude-code-action, we can't be certain if 'id-token: write' is actually unnecessary. The action is in beta, and its documentation would be the source of truth for required permissions. I might be too quick to dismiss this security concern. Even if we're not sure, raising awareness about permission scoping could be valuable. While security is important, making speculative comments without clear evidence that the permission is unnecessary violates our review rules. We should trust that the action's authors have specified their required permissions. Delete this comment as it's speculative and we don't have strong evidence that the permission is unnecessary. The action may well require this permission level.
2. .github/workflows/claude-auto-review.yml:24
- Draft comment:
Ensure 'timeout_minutes' as a string is accepted; numeric value might be expected. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%None
3. .github/workflows/claude-auto-review.yml:21
- Draft comment:
Using '@beta' for claude-code-action may risk instability. Consider pinning a stable version. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% Using @beta tags in production workflows can be risky as beta versions may have breaking changes. However, this is a new action that may not have stable releases yet. Without checking the action's repository, I can't be certain that @v1 exists or is the right version to suggest. The comment makes assumptions about available versions. I don't actually know if a v1 release exists for this action. The @beta tag might be the only or recommended version currently available. While version pinning is generally good practice, making specific version suggestions without confirming they exist could lead to incorrect recommendations. The comment should be removed as it makes assumptions about available versions without clear evidence that @v1 exists or is appropriate.
4. .github/workflows/claude-auto-review.yml:25
- Draft comment:
The detailed 'direct_prompt' is very specific. Verify it fits all PR contexts, not just Go/Kubernetes. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is asking the PR author to verify something, which is against the rules. It doesn't provide a specific suggestion or ask for a specific test to be written. Therefore, it should be removed.
Workflow ID: wflow_sT0xfnwbIeIMNbDk
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Important
Adds a GitHub Actions workflow for automatic PR review using Claude AI, focusing on code quality and best practices.
.github/workflows/claude-auto-review.ymlfor automatic PR review using Claude AI.pull_requestevents of typeopenedandsynchronize.contents: read,pull-requests: read, andid-token: write.actions/checkout@v4.anthropics/claude-code-action@betato review PRs with a focus on code quality, potential bugs, performance, security, test coverage, documentation, and Kubernetes/Go best practices.This description was created by
for 36b5f2d. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.