refactor: modify DSL rules to support new structure #1605
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to rule definitions and permission logic across multiple files. Key alterations include simplifying the parameters of rules such as Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant System
participant Context
User->>System: Request access
System->>Context: Check context attributes
Context-->>System: Return attributes
System->>System: Evaluate permissions using context
System-->>User: Grant or deny access
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Additional comments not posted (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- assets/example-shapes/disney-plus.yaml (1 hunks)
- docs/getting-started/modeling.mdx (1 hunks)
- docs/use-cases/abac.mdx (13 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (13)
assets/example-shapes/disney-plus.yaml (1)
48-50: Verify the rule invocations are updated to match the new signature.The rule signature and body changes look good. The updated rule signature is simpler and more consistent with the rule body, which directly accesses the context's region data.
However, please ensure that all invocations of the
check_regionrule are updated to remove theregionargument, as this is a breaking change.Run the following script to verify the rule usage:
Verification successful
Rule invocations correctly updated to match the new signature
The verification process confirms that all occurrences of the
check_regionrule in the codebase are consistent with the new signature. The rule is correctly defined with a singleallowed_regionparameter, and its usage in theaction viewdefinition also matches this updated signature.No further actions are required regarding the
check_regionrule update.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all invocations of the `check_region` rule match the new signature. # Test: Search for the rule usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'check_region'Length of output: 786
docs/use-cases/abac.mdx (12)
90-94: LGTM!The changes simplify the permission definition by directly referencing the
ip_rangeattribute in thecheck_ip_rangerule. The overall permission logic remains the same.
137-141: LGTM!The changes simplify the permission definition by directly referencing the
locationattribute in thecheck_locationrule. Using thecurrent_locationfrom the context data ensures consistency in how the location is determined.
161-167: LGTM!The changes simplify the permission definition by directly referencing the
min_ageattribute in thecheck_agerule. Using theagefrom the context data ensures consistency in how the age is determined.
188-192: LGTM!The changes simplify the permission definition by directly referencing the
balanceattribute in thecheck_balancerule. Using theamountfrom the context data ensures consistency in how the withdrawal amount is determined.
Line range hint
253-266: LGTM!The changes simplify the permission definition by directly referencing the
valid_weekdaysattribute in theis_weekdayrule. Using theday_of_weekfrom the context data ensures consistency in how the day is determined. Thevalid_weekdaysattribute allows for flexibility in defining valid days for each organization.
277-282: LGTM!The request keys for the
organization.viewpermission check are consistent with the changes made to theis_weekdayrule and theviewpermission. The keys correctly reference thevalid_weekdaysattribute and thememberrelation.
299-303: SkippedThis code segment is a duplicate of the previous one. No further comments are necessary.
321-326: LGTM!The request keys for the
account.withdrawpermission check are consistent with the changes made to thecheck_balancerule and thewithdrawpermission. The keys correctly reference thebalanceattribute and theownerrelation.
402-406: SkippedThis code segment is a duplicate of the previous one. No further comments are necessary.
418-418: LGTM!The example context data includes the relevant attributes (
ip_addressandday_of_week) used in the permission rules. This allows for flexibility in defining the necessary context for each permission check.
536-539: More context neededThe code snippet defines a
deletepermission that relies on theis_weekdayrule and thevalid_weekdaysattribute. However, the complete context of the entity and thevalid_weekdaysattribute definition is missing. Please provide the surrounding code for a more comprehensive review.
[incomplete_context]
561-565: LGTM!The attribute and permission definitions for the
repositoryentity are well-structured and provide appropriate access control:
- The
is_publicattribute determines public visibility of the repository.- The
editpermission maintains consistency with the relatedorganization'sviewpermission.- The
deletepermission utilizes theis_weekdayrule with thevalid_weekdaysattribute to restrict deletion to specific
| attribute ip_range string[] | ||
| permission view = check_ip_range(request.ip, ip_range) or admin | ||
| permission view = check_ip_range(ip_range) or admin |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Update test files and documentation for consistency with check_ip_range changes
The simplification of the check_ip_range function has been successfully implemented in most of the codebase. However, there are some inconsistencies that need to be addressed:
-
Test files still use the old signature:
- internal/storage/memory/schemaReader_test.go
- internal/storage/postgres/schemaReader_test.go
-
Mixed usage in documentation:
- docs/use-cases/abac.mdx contains both old and new signatures
To ensure consistency and prevent potential errors, please:
- Update the test files to use the new
check_ip_rangesignature with a single parameter. - Revise docs/use-cases/abac.mdx to consistently use the new signature throughout the document.
These changes will align all parts of the codebase with the simplified check_ip_range implementation.
Analysis chain
Simplification of the view permission logic looks good!
The change leverages the context data directly for the IP address, simplifying the permission check.
Please ensure the following:
- Verify that the IP address is consistently available in the context data.
- Run the following script to identify and update any remaining invocations of
check_ip_rangewith the old signature:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all invocations of `check_ip_range` have been updated to the new signature.
# Test: Search for the old usage pattern. Expect: No results.
rg --type perm -A 5 $'check_ip_range\(.*,.*\)'
Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all invocations of `check_ip_range` have been updated to the new signature.
# Search for potential old usage patterns of check_ip_range
echo "Searching for potential old usage patterns of check_ip_range:"
rg -n -C 3 'check_ip_range\s*\([^)]+,[^)]+\)'
# Search for all occurrences of check_ip_range to compare
echo -e "\nSearching for all occurrences of check_ip_range:"
rg -n -C 3 'check_ip_range'
Length of output: 11020
| rule check_ip_range(ip_range string[]) { | ||
| context.data.ip in ip_range |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Inconsistent usage of check_ip_range detected across the codebase
The verification process has revealed that the check_ip_range function is not consistently updated throughout the codebase. While some instances use the new single-parameter signature, others still use the old two-parameter version. This inconsistency needs to be addressed to ensure proper functionality and maintain code coherence.
Please update the following:
- Test files:
internal/storage/postgres/schemaReader_test.gointernal/storage/memory/schemaReader_test.go
- Documentation:
docs/use-cases/abac.mdx
When updating these files, ensure that:
- The function signature is changed to
check_ip_range(ip_range string[]). - Any calls to
check_ip_rangeare updated to use only theip_rangeparameter. - The function body uses
context.data.ipinstead of a passedipparameter.
After making these changes, thoroughly test the affected components to ensure no functionality is broken.
Analysis chain
Encapsulation enhancement of the check_ip_range rule looks good!
The rule now directly leverages the context data for the IP address, enhancing encapsulation and simplifying the logic.
Please ensure the following:
- Verify that the IP address is consistently available under
context.data.ip. - Run the following script to identify and update any remaining invocations of
check_ip_rangewith the old signature:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all invocations of `check_ip_range` have been updated to the new signature.
# Test: Search for the old usage pattern. Expect: No results.
rg --type perm -A 5 $'check_ip_range\(.*,.*\)'
Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all invocations of `check_ip_range` have been updated to the new signature and find all occurrences.
# Search for the old usage pattern (two or more arguments)
echo "Searching for old usage pattern of check_ip_range:"
rg 'check_ip_range\([^)]+,[^)]+\)'
# Search for all occurrences of check_ip_range
echo -e "\nAll occurrences of check_ip_range:"
rg 'check_ip_range'
# Use ast-grep to find function calls to check_ip_range
echo -e "\nFunction calls to check_ip_range using ast-grep:"
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'check_ip_range($_)'
Length of output: 3274
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
organizationandcontententities.