-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
Rename Fluent-related code to be more precise. #21602
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
3c106d0 to
8cfcada
Compare
|
I'd be happy to rename |
|
I find I'm fine with either |
|
Removed |
|
Something generic like |
|
I more or less agree, but they were already discussed and ruled out for FluentBundle etc on Discord. |
2874407 to
7a4706b
Compare
PunkPun
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Couldn't find any regressions
|
I think this is actually more imprecise. @projectfluent is not about managing strings, but natural language translations. While this is just internal API and I like the more concise, |
A spin off from active discussions on Discord: The term "translation" is used without restraint throughout the code and yaml to refer to many distinct concepts - many of which may be language related, but are not translation (i.e the ability to select between different languages) related.
This PR applies a brute-force rename in an attempt to define more precise terminology for language- and (specifically) fluent-related concepts/code to free up "translation" for the actual (future) translation implementation details.
This intentionally avoids changing the external API exposed to yaml and lua, these are left to followup PRs as they will contain logic changes in addition to just renaming.