这是indexloc提供的服务,不要输入任何密码
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 4, 2021. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@justinsb
Copy link
Contributor

Force-detach EBS volumes, to simulate a catastrophic EBS failure. Typically the instances continue to run, but all I/O to the EBS volumes block forever. Sort of similar to the behaviour seen in total EBS failures.

"Sadly" we can't detach the root EBS volume, so this is only applicable when there's a non-root EBS volume attached. But the strategy auto-detects whether that is the case, and just removes itself from the applicable list if it can't be applied.

Force-detaching EBS volumes is quite likely to cause data corruption, so don't use this on production data where you don't have a good backup. But if you're stress testing a database on test data, it's not a bad one to try out!

This should simulate an EBS failure.  With luck, the instance will keep running though,
and keep responding to pings.  All I/O will fail though, and eventually the kernel will
hang, crash or panic.
Conflicts:
	src/main/java/com/netflix/simianarmy/chaos/ChaosType.java
	src/main/java/com/netflix/simianarmy/chaos/ShutdownInstanceChaosType.java
Conflicts:
	src/main/java/com/netflix/simianarmy/chaos/ShutdownInstanceChaosType.java
Conflicts:
	src/main/java/com/netflix/simianarmy/chaos/ChaosType.java
Conflicts:
	src/main/java/com/netflix/simianarmy/basic/chaos/BasicChaosMonkey.java
Because we're blocked from detaching it, we shouldn't count it when deciding whether it's a valid strategy.
Conflicts:
	src/main/java/com/netflix/simianarmy/basic/chaos/BasicChaosMonkey.java
Conflicts:
	src/main/java/com/netflix/simianarmy/basic/chaos/BasicChaosMonkey.java
@cloudbees-pull-request-builder

SimianArmy-pull-requests #61 FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request

@cloudbees-pull-request-builder

SimianArmy-pull-requests #63 FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request

@cloudbees-pull-request-builder

SimianArmy-pull-requests #65 SUCCESS
This pull request looks good

@coryb
Copy link
Contributor

coryb commented Oct 8, 2013

this PR is obsolete by #93
closing.

@coryb coryb closed this Oct 8, 2013
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants