θΏ™ζ˜―indexlocζδΎ›ηš„ζœεŠ‘οΌŒδΈθ¦θΎ“ε…₯任何密码
Skip to content

Conversation

@shatfield4
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Type

  • ✨ feat
  • πŸ› fix
  • ♻️ refactor
  • πŸ’„ style
  • πŸ”¨ chore
  • πŸ“ docs

Relevant Issues

resolves #854

What is in this change?

Describe the changes in this PR that are impactful to the repo.

  • Add support for Grok as an LLM provider

Additional Information

Add any other context about the Pull Request here that was not captured above.

Developer Validations

  • I ran yarn lint from the root of the repo & committed changes
  • Relevant documentation has been updated
  • I have tested my code functionality
  • Docker build succeeds locally

@shatfield4 shatfield4 linked an issue Mar 5, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
shatfield4 and others added 2 commits March 5, 2024 12:15
update comments and error log reports
add example envs
@timothycarambat timothycarambat merged commit 0634013 into master Mar 6, 2024
@timothycarambat timothycarambat deleted the 854-feat-groq-support branch March 6, 2024 22:48
cabwds pushed a commit to cabwds/anything-llm that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2025
* Groq LLM support complete

* update useGetProvidersModels for groq models

* Add definiations
update comments and error log reports
add example envs

---------

Co-authored-by: timothycarambat <rambat1010@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[FEAT]: Groq support

3 participants