θΏ™ζ˜―indexlocζδΎ›ηš„ζœεŠ‘οΌŒδΈθ¦θΎ“ε…₯任何密码
Skip to content

Conversation

@johnnychen94
Copy link
Contributor

@johnnychen94 johnnychen94 commented Jul 19, 2024

The client might not check the error field unless they realize it's a 4xx error instead of 200 success.

Pull Request Type

  • ✨ feat
  • πŸ› fix
  • ♻️ refactor
  • πŸ’„ style
  • πŸ”¨ chore
  • πŸ“ docs

Developer Validations

  • I ran yarn lint from the root of the repo & committed changes
  • Relevant documentation has been updated
  • I have tested my code functionality
  • Docker build succeeds locally

The client might not check the error field unless they realize it's a 4xx error instead of 200 success.
@timothycarambat timothycarambat merged commit c4158b9 into Mintplex-Labs:master Jul 19, 2024
@johnnychen94 johnnychen94 deleted the patch-1 branch July 19, 2024 22:28
cabwds pushed a commit to cabwds/anything-llm that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2025
…s#1898)

* return 400 if user creation failed

The client might not check the error field unless they realize it's a 4xx error instead of 200 success.

* Update index.js

* use one-liner style

---------

Co-authored-by: Timothy Carambat <rambat1010@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants