这是indexloc提供的服务,不要输入任何密码
Skip to content

Conversation

@alifeinbinary
Copy link

Addresses issue:
cedricdelpoux/react-responsive-masonry#141

According to the documentation here: https://github.com/cedricdelpoux/react-responsive-masonry
the ResponsiveMasonry component should allow for gutterBreakpoints as an optional property but no such definition is provided in the current type definitions.

Please fill in this template.

Select one of these and delete the others:

If changing an existing definition:

  • Provide a URL to documentation or source code which provides context for the suggested changes: react-responsive-masonry repo
  • If this PR brings the type definitions up to date with a new version of the JS library, update the version number in the package.json.

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

typescript-bot commented Nov 4, 2025

@alifeinbinary Thank you for submitting this PR! I see this is your first time submitting to DefinitelyTyped 👋 — I'm the local bot who will help you through the process of getting things through.

This is a live comment that I will keep updated.

1 package in this PR

Code Reviews

Because you edited one package and updated the tests (👏), I can help you merge this PR once someone else signs off on it.

You can test the changes of this PR in the Playground.

Status

  • ✅ No merge conflicts
  • ✅ Continuous integration tests have passed
  • 🕐 Most recent commit is approved by type definition owners, DT maintainers or others

Once every item on this list is checked, I'll ask you for permission to merge and publish the changes.

Inactive

This PR has been inactive for 12 days — please try to get reviewers!


Diagnostic Information: What the bot saw about this PR
{
  "type": "info",
  "now": "-",
  "pr_number": 74015,
  "author": "alifeinbinary",
  "headCommitOid": "c774e75f8e2e086c170636964de04d259eb462bf",
  "mergeBaseOid": "ff41535d2d84f62f459fa56a9c462182ed9d1ab3",
  "lastPushDate": "2025-11-04T04:28:32.000Z",
  "lastActivityDate": "2025-11-04T04:52:30.000Z",
  "hasMergeConflict": false,
  "isFirstContribution": true,
  "tooManyFiles": false,
  "hugeChange": false,
  "popularityLevel": "Well-liked by everyone",
  "pkgInfo": [
    {
      "name": "react-responsive-masonry",
      "kind": "edit",
      "files": [
        {
          "path": "types/react-responsive-masonry/index.d.ts",
          "kind": "definition"
        },
        {
          "path": "types/react-responsive-masonry/package.json",
          "kind": "package-meta-ok"
        },
        {
          "path": "types/react-responsive-masonry/react-responsive-masonry-tests.tsx",
          "kind": "test"
        }
      ],
      "owners": [
        "themashcodee"
      ],
      "addedOwners": [],
      "deletedOwners": [],
      "popularityLevel": "Well-liked by everyone"
    }
  ],
  "reviews": [],
  "mainBotCommentID": 3483708515,
  "ciResult": "pass"
}

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🔔 @themashcodee — please review this PR in the next few days. Be sure to explicitly select Approve or Request Changes in the GitHub UI so I know what's going on.

@typescript-bot typescript-bot added the The CI failed When GH Actions fails label Nov 4, 2025
@typescript-bot typescript-bot moved this from Waiting for Code Reviews to Needs Author Action in Pull Request Status Board Nov 4, 2025
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@alifeinbinary The CI build failed! Please review the logs for more information.

Once you've pushed the fixes, the build will automatically re-run. Thanks!

Note: builds that are failing do not end up on the list of PRs for the DT maintainers to review.

@typescript-bot typescript-bot removed the The CI failed When GH Actions fails label Nov 4, 2025
@typescript-bot typescript-bot moved this from Needs Author Action to Waiting for Code Reviews in Pull Request Status Board Nov 4, 2025
@typescript-bot typescript-bot added the The CI failed When GH Actions fails label Nov 4, 2025
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@alifeinbinary The CI build failed! Please review the logs for more information.

Once you've pushed the fixes, the build will automatically re-run. Thanks!

Note: builds that are failing do not end up on the list of PRs for the DT maintainers to review.

@typescript-bot typescript-bot moved this from Waiting for Code Reviews to Needs Author Action in Pull Request Status Board Nov 4, 2025
@typescript-bot typescript-bot removed the The CI failed When GH Actions fails label Nov 4, 2025
@typescript-bot typescript-bot moved this from Needs Author Action to Waiting for Code Reviews in Pull Request Status Board Nov 4, 2025
@typescript-bot typescript-bot added the The CI failed When GH Actions fails label Nov 4, 2025
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@alifeinbinary The CI build failed! Please review the logs for more information.

Once you've pushed the fixes, the build will automatically re-run. Thanks!

Note: builds that are failing do not end up on the list of PRs for the DT maintainers to review.

@typescript-bot typescript-bot moved this from Waiting for Code Reviews to Needs Author Action in Pull Request Status Board Nov 4, 2025
@typescript-bot typescript-bot removed the The CI failed When GH Actions fails label Nov 4, 2025
@typescript-bot typescript-bot moved this from Needs Author Action to Waiting for Code Reviews in Pull Request Status Board Nov 4, 2025
@DangerBotOSS
Copy link

DangerBotOSS commented Nov 4, 2025

Formatting

The following files are not formatted:

  1. types/react-responsive-masonry/index.d.ts

Consider running pnpm dprint fmt on these files to make review easier.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against c774e75

@typescript-bot typescript-bot added the Unreviewed No one showed up to review this PR, so it'll be reviewed by a DT maintainer. label Nov 15, 2025
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Re-ping @themashcodee:

This PR has been out for over a week, yet I haven't seen any reviews.

Could someone please give it some attention? Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Unreviewed No one showed up to review this PR, so it'll be reviewed by a DT maintainer.

Projects

Status: Waiting for Code Reviews

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants