这是indexloc提供的服务,不要输入任何密码
Skip to content

Add Feature Service attachment tunneling config #14602

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Dawid212
Copy link
Contributor

This PR adds tunnelingConfig to ServiceAttachment.

Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)

See Write release notes for guidance.

compute: added `tunnelingConfig` field to `ServiceAttachment` resource

@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from slevenick July 23, 2025 10:33
Copy link

Hello! I am a robot. Tests will require approval from a repository maintainer to run.

Googlers: For automatic test runs see go/terraform-auto-test-runs.

@slevenick, a repository maintainer, has been assigned to review your changes. If you have not received review feedback within 2 business days, please leave a comment on this PR asking them to take a look.

You can help make sure that review is quick by doing a self-review and by running impacted tests locally.

Copy link
Contributor

@slevenick slevenick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please format the changelog entry to match https://googlecloudplatform.github.io/magic-modules/code-review/release-notes/#type-specific-guidelines-and-examples

It should use snake_case for field names, and the resource name should match the resource name in Terraform rather than the API

description: |
Tunneling configuration for this service attachment.
min_version: beta
ignore_read: true
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we need ignore read here?

@@ -209,6 +236,21 @@ properties:
immutable: true
item_type:
type: String
- name: 'tunnelingConfig'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add an update test for this field

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants