-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 458
{Do not review} Test rapid appends package #3573
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Hey there and thank you for opening this pull request! 👋🏼 We require pull request titles to follow the Conventional Commits specification and it looks like your proposed title needs to be adjusted. Details:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @anushka567, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request is a work-in-progress test PR focused on developing and validating the "rapid appends" functionality. It introduces a new, critical integration test case to ensure correct behavior when multiple clients attempt to append to the same file, specifically testing session invalidation and takeover scenarios. The changes also include refactoring of test setup and isolation of the "rapid appends" tests in the e2e test runner.
Highlights
- Test Isolation: The e2e test runner script (
improved_run_e2e_tests.sh
) was modified to exclusively run the "rapid_appends" tests for zonal buckets. This change allows for focused development and debugging of the rapid appends feature by isolating its test execution. - Test File Renaming: The primary test file for rapid appends was renamed from
rapid_appends_test.go
toappends_test.go
. This is likely a refactoring for better naming consistency within therapid_appends
package. - Test Setup Refactoring: The test setup in
appends_test.go
was refactored. The logic for creating an unfinalized object was extracted into a new helper functioncreateUnfinalizedObject()
. BothSetupSubTest()
and a newly addedSetupTest()
now utilize this helper, reducing code duplication and improving test setup clarity. - New Integration Test Case: A significant new integration test,
TestAppendSessionInvalidatedByAnotherClientUponTakeover
, was added toappends_test.go
. This test verifies the behavior of append sessions when a takeover occurs, ensuring that the original client's session is correctly invalidated and subsequent operations fail with anESTALE
error, while the new client can successfully append and sync. - Test Constants: New constants
initialContent
andappendContent
were introduced insetup_test.go
to provide clear, descriptive values for use in the newly added test case, enhancing readability and maintainability.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request appears to be focused on testing the rapid_appends
package. The changes include renaming the test file, refactoring test setup, adding a new test case for append session invalidation, and modifying the E2E test script to focus only on this package. The review has identified a few areas for improvement: a critical test cleanup function (TearDownSubTest
) has been removed without a replacement, which could lead to test artifacts being left behind; the E2E test script has been modified to reduce test coverage; and there's an inconsistency in how test state is managed within the test suite.
func (t *RapidAppendsSuite) SetupSubTest() { | ||
t.createUnfinalizedObject() | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (t *RapidAppendsSuite) SetupTest() { | ||
t.createUnfinalizedObject() | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The TearDownSubTest
function, which was responsible for cleaning up test files, has been removed. Additionally, SetupTest
has been added without a corresponding TearDownTest
. Failing to clean up resources created during tests is poor practice and can lead to an accumulation of artifacts, potentially causing side effects in other tests or consuming unnecessary disk space.
func (t *RapidAppendsSuite) TearDownTest() {
err := os.Remove(path.Join(primaryMntTestDirPath, t.fileName))
// It's possible the file doesn't exist if the test removed it, so we can ignore 'not exist' errors.
if err != nil && !os.IsNotExist(err) {
require.NoError(t.T(), err)
}
}
func (t *RapidAppendsSuite) TearDownSubTest() {
t.TearDownTest()
}
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ TEST_PACKAGES_COMMON=( | |||
# Test packages for regional buckets. | |||
TEST_PACKAGES_FOR_RB=("${TEST_PACKAGES_COMMON[@]}" "inactive_stream_timeout" "cloud_profiler") | |||
# Test packages for zonal buckets. | |||
TEST_PACKAGES_FOR_ZB=("${TEST_PACKAGES_COMMON[@]}" "unfinalized_object" "rapid_appends") | |||
TEST_PACKAGES_FOR_ZB=("rapid_appends") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change reduces test coverage for zonal buckets by only running the rapid_appends
package. While this is useful for focused testing during development, it should be reverted before merging to ensure all tests for zonal buckets are executed in the CI pipeline.
TEST_PACKAGES_FOR_ZB=("rapid_appends") | |
TEST_PACKAGES_FOR_ZB=("${TEST_PACKAGES_COMMON[@]}" "unfinalized_object" "rapid_appends") |
_, err := appendFileHandle.WriteString(initialContent) | ||
require.NoError(t.T(), err) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this test, t.fileContent
is not updated after this WriteString
call. This is inconsistent with the appendToFile
helper function used in TestAppendsAndRead
, which does update t.fileContent
. While this behavior is correct for this specific test's logic (as the write is expected to be lost), the inconsistency can make the test suite harder to understand and maintain.
// This write is expected to be lost due to session takeover, so we don't update t.fileContent.
_, err := appendFileHandle.WriteString(initialContent)
require.NoError(t.T(), err)
Please ensure your PR title follows the format:
Example:
feat(api): add user login endpoint
Available types:
feat
: A new featurefix
: A bug fixdocs
: Documentation only changesstyle
: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)refactor
: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a featureperf
: A code change that improves performancetest
: Adding missing tests or correcting existing testsbuild
: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: gulp, broccoli, npm)ci
: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: Travis, Circle, BrowserStack, SauceLabs)chore
: Other changes that don't modify src or test filesrevert
: Reverts a previous commitDescription
Link to the issue in case of a bug fix.
Testing details
Any backward incompatible change? If so, please explain.