这是indexloc提供的服务,不要输入任何密码
Skip to content

test(rapid appends): validate content appended in non-append mode available on GCS only after close() #3530

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: ft-appends-must-fail-when-another-append-in-progress
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

anushka567
Copy link
Member

@anushka567 anushka567 commented Jul 16, 2025

Description

This functional test covers the scenario where an unfinalized object is opened in a non-append mode to be written to. According to the heuristics that GCSFuse has in place, such a scenario does not trigger the buffered writes flow, instead falling back to the legacy path, hence, the appends that are done to the unfinalized object will not be visible in GCS in real time.

The test includes:

  • A file handle opened to the unfinalized object in non append mode and "appending" to it.
  • Reads from the secondary mount against the same object to ensure the correct behavior.

NOTE : To unskip the test once support for CreateObject() on unfinalized object is in place.

Link to the issue in case of a bug fix.

b/432130679

Testing details

  1. Manual - Yes. The expected path is followed. However, due to the lack of support of CreateObject() API on unfinalized object, the test will fail due to its invocation in the legacy path.
  2. Unit tests - NA
  3. Integration tests - NA

Any backward incompatible change? If so, please explain.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @anushka567, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new integration test to ensure the correct eventual consistency behavior for unfinalized objects in Google Cloud Storage. The test validates that data written to such objects in a non-append mode is only made durable and visible on GCS after the file stream is closed, aligning with expected cloud storage semantics.

Highlights

  • New Integration Test: I've added a new integration test, TestContentAppendedInNonAppendModeNotVisibleTillClose, to validate the behavior of content visibility for unfinalized objects in Google Cloud Storage (GCS).
  • Unfinalized Object Content Visibility: This test specifically verifies that when content is appended to an unfinalized object using a non-append mode write (e.g., WriteAt after os.OpenFile with O_WRONLY|O_DIRECT), the newly written data is not immediately visible on GCS until the file handle is explicitly closed.
  • Test Status: The newly introduced test is currently skipped. This is a temporary measure until CreateObject() support for unfinalized objects is fully implemented and available.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a new integration test to validate that content written to a file in non-append mode is only visible on GCS after the file handle is closed. There is a resource leak with a *storage.Writer that needs to be addressed, and the file handle cleanup could be made more robust to prevent leaks on test failure.

@anushka567 anushka567 force-pushed the ft-data-not-visible-till-fclose-when-open-in-rw-mode branch 2 times, most recently from 0ce758a to cc44961 Compare July 16, 2025 08:42
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (ft-appends-must-fail-when-another-append-in-progress@84a7ca4). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                                   Coverage Diff                                   @@
##             ft-appends-must-fail-when-another-append-in-progress    #3530   +/-   ##
=======================================================================================
  Coverage                                                        ?   78.82%           
=======================================================================================
  Files                                                           ?      140           
  Lines                                                           ?    18600           
  Branches                                                        ?        0           
=======================================================================================
  Hits                                                            ?    14662           
  Misses                                                          ?     3447           
  Partials                                                        ?      491           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 78.82% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@anushka567 anushka567 changed the title testing(zonal bucket): validate content appended in non-append mode available on GCS only after close() test(rapid appends): validate content appended in non-append mode available on GCS only after close() Jul 17, 2025
@anushka567 anushka567 force-pushed the ft-data-not-visible-till-fclose-when-open-in-rw-mode branch from cc44961 to 0b421c5 Compare July 21, 2025 16:02
@anushka567 anushka567 marked this pull request as ready for review July 22, 2025 03:43
@anushka567 anushka567 requested review from Tulsishah and a team as code owners July 22, 2025 03:43
@anushka567 anushka567 force-pushed the ft-appends-must-fail-when-another-append-in-progress branch 2 times, most recently from f26c312 to 4cf2d1e Compare July 23, 2025 05:03
@anushka567 anushka567 force-pushed the ft-data-not-visible-till-fclose-when-open-in-rw-mode branch from 0b421c5 to 7a1f768 Compare July 23, 2025 05:11
@anushka567 anushka567 force-pushed the ft-data-not-visible-till-fclose-when-open-in-rw-mode branch from 7a1f768 to 2ee2a23 Compare July 23, 2025 06:59
@anushka567 anushka567 added execute-integration-tests-on-zb To run E2E tests on zonal bucket. and removed execute-integration-tests-on-zb To run E2E tests on zonal bucket. labels Jul 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants