USRE30943E - Stabilized mixture - Google Patents
Stabilized mixture Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USRE30943E USRE30943E US06/068,412 US6841279A USRE30943E US RE30943 E USRE30943 E US RE30943E US 6841279 A US6841279 A US 6841279A US RE30943 E USRE30943 E US RE30943E
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- fly ash
- kiln dust
- cement kiln
- per
- cement
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 38
- 239000010881 fly ash Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 46
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 45
- 239000004568 cement Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 39
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- 239000011398 Portland cement Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 239000002585 base Substances 0.000 description 35
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 23
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 21
- 235000019738 Limestone Nutrition 0.000 description 19
- 239000006028 limestone Substances 0.000 description 19
- 235000008733 Citrus aurantifolia Nutrition 0.000 description 10
- 235000011941 Tilia x europaea Nutrition 0.000 description 10
- 239000004571 lime Substances 0.000 description 10
- 230000000740 bleeding effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000010426 asphalt Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000003245 coal Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000002956 ash Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000005056 compaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 4
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000011384 asphalt concrete Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000002485 combustion reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000004567 concrete Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 3
- 235000002918 Fraxinus excelsior Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000003513 alkali Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000003208 petroleum Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002893 slag Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002791 soaking Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004575 stone Substances 0.000 description 2
- 150000003467 sulfuric acid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 229910018404 Al2 O3 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L Calcium chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[Cl-].[Ca+2] UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 229910017344 Fe2 O3 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910004742 Na2 O Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012615 aggregate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052681 coesite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012669 compression test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052906 cristobalite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002939 deleterious effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000005357 flat glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910010272 inorganic material Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011147 inorganic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003077 lignite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000465 moulding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012716 precipitator Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002994 raw material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010008 shearing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002910 solid waste Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003381 stabilizer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000087 stabilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052682 stishovite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052905 tridymite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B28/00—Compositions of mortars, concrete or artificial stone, containing inorganic binders or the reaction product of an inorganic and an organic binder, e.g. polycarboxylate cements
- C04B28/02—Compositions of mortars, concrete or artificial stone, containing inorganic binders or the reaction product of an inorganic and an organic binder, e.g. polycarboxylate cements containing hydraulic cements other than calcium sulfates
- C04B28/04—Portland cements
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B18/00—Use of agglomerated or waste materials or refuse as fillers for mortars, concrete or artificial stone; Treatment of agglomerated or waste materials or refuse, specially adapted to enhance their filling properties in mortars, concrete or artificial stone
- C04B18/04—Waste materials; Refuse
- C04B18/16—Waste materials; Refuse from building or ceramic industry
- C04B18/162—Cement kiln dust; Lime kiln dust
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02W—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
- Y02W30/00—Technologies for solid waste management
- Y02W30/50—Reuse, recycling or recovery technologies
- Y02W30/91—Use of waste materials as fillers for mortars or concrete
Definitions
- This invention relates to materials which are capable of supporting surfacing such as pavement bases.
- the base for the surfacing material should comprise a granular or gravel base.
- cement-aggregate or bituminous (asphalt)-aggregate bases As reported in the Highway Research Board Special Report 61E, titled The AASHO Road Test, Report 5, Pavement Research, publication 954 of National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, there is a clear superiority of such treated bases over untreated bases. In recent years, treated bases have become commonly known as stabilized bases.
- Asphalt stabilized bases have become the most dominant stabilized base utilized to support a flexible surfacing such as asphalt concrete.
- asphalt concrete has found extensive use as a resurfacing material for concrete pavement.
- a lime-fly ash-aggregate stabilized base be used in road paving.
- Such a base consists of a mixture of proper quantities of lime, fly ash, and graded aggregate at optimum moisture content, in which the stability is greatly enhanced by the cementing action which results from complex chemical reactions between the lime and the fly ash in the presence of water.
- Stabilized bases are usually employed as base courses under wearing surfaces such as hot mixed, hot laid asphaltic concrete. A wearing surface is necessary to resist the high shearing stresses which are caused by traction, but the stabilized base provides the required stability to support wheel loads.
- a serious obstacle to the expanded use of stabilized bases is the high energy costs for making the materials.
- portland cement which is used in stabilizing bases requires substantial quantities of coal in manufacture.
- United States Department of Transportation has suggested that fly ash be substituted for a portion of the portland cement utilized in concrete or cement-aggregate bases, Federal Highway Administration Notice N5080.4, Jan. 17, 1974.
- asphalt-aggregate bases which is derived from petroleum processing not only utilizes petroleum which is in short supply but also requires high energy to produce them.
- the lime, fly ash and graded aggregate stabilized bases utilize lime which requires coal in production.
- Such bases have been used in limited geographical areas of the United States where they can compete economically because of availability of lime and fly ash.
- the predominantly used stabilized bases utilize materials that are in short supply and require substantial quantities of energy to produce them.
- the materials may be termed energy intensive. There is a need to avoid or minimize the use of such energy intensive materials in road paving.
- the objects of the invention are to provide a mixture of materials for producing a stabilized base comprising a hard, strong, durable mass capable of supporting surfacing which avoids or minimizes the use of materials which are energy intensive and, moreover, utilizes materials that normally are waste materials that are readily available.
- the mixture consists essentially of fly ash and cement kiln dust which reacts at ambient temperature with water to produce a durable mass.
- FIGS. 1-3 are curves of compressive strength versus age at test for various compositions.
- FIG. 4 is curves of energy requirements for various pavement materials.
- the pozzolanic load supporting composition utilizes cement kiln dust.
- the solid waste generated by cement manufacture is primarily kiln dust.
- This dust contains a mixture of raw kiln feed, partly calcined material, finely divided cement klinker and alkali sulfates (usually sulfates).
- alkali sulfates usually sulfates.
- typical cement kiln dust may have the following analyses:
- finely ash as used in connection with stabilized bases is well known and as used herein is intended to indicate the finely divided ash residue produced by the combustion of pulverized coal or lignite, which ash is carried off with the gases exhausted from the furnace in which the coal is burned and which is collected from these gases usually by means of suitable precipitation apparatus such as electrical precipitators.
- suitable precipitation apparatus such as electrical precipitators.
- Those finely pulverized ashes resulting from combustion of oil and from combustion of waste materials in a large incinerator or natural pozzolans can also be utilized in the methods described herein providing their chemical compositions are reasonably similar to pulverized coal fly ashes.
- fly ash so obtained is in a finely divided state such that usually at least 70% by weight passes through a 200-mesh sieve, although incinerator ashes may be considerably coarser. Fly ash may be considered an "artificial pozzolan", as distinguished from a "natural pozzolan”.
- aggregate as used in connection with load supporting compositions is also well known and refers to natural or artificial inorganic materials most of which are substantially chemically inert with respect to fly ash and lime, and substantially insoluble in water.
- aggregate may comprise limestone, sand, blast furnace slag, gravel, synthetic aggregate and other similar material.
- Aggregates can comprise a wide range of types and gradations, including sands, gravels, crushed stones, and several types of slag. Aggregates should be of such gradation that, when mixed with cement kiln dust, fly ash and water, the resulting mixture is mechanically stable under compaction equipment and capable of being compacted in the field to high density.
- the aggregate should be free from deleterious organic or chemical substances which may interfere with the desired chemical reaction between the cement kiln dust, fly ash and water. Further, the aggregate should preferably consist of hard, durable particles, free from soft or disintegrated pieces.
- a preferable mixture comprises:
- mixture for use in road stabilizer bases may preferably vary as follows:
- test specimens were molded using a mechanical compactor, having a 10 pound hammer with an 18 inch drop.
- the material was placed in the molds in three equal layers, and compacted by 25 blows per layer.
- the machine has a revolving turntable to evenly distribute the blows over the surface of the layer being compacted.
- the samples were carefully removed from the molds, weighed, and sealed in plastic bag, labeled for identification, and placed in a constant temperature oven at 100° F. to cure until tested. Two cylinders of each mix were marked for testing at 7, 14 and 28 days of curing. After removal from the oven, the samples are submerged in water for four hours, removed, and allowed to drain on a non-absorbant surface, capped, and tested within one hour after removal from the water.
- the capping compound used is "Hydro-Stone" a lime based, quick-hardening compound. Plate glass was used to obtain even, parallel caps on the test specimens.
- mixtures containing cement kiln dust vary but in each instant produce a base that is stabilized.
- additives or admixtures generally do not affect the strength except that a retarder tends to prevent the early development of strength as might be expected.
- the strength of mixtures including cement kiln dust compare favorably with a lime, fly ash, aggregate mixture.
- even a mixture of cement kiln dust and fly ash produces a stabilized base.
- the mixtures of the present invention result in a stabilized base that is comparable in strength and required performance characteristics to cement-aggregate or lime-fly ash-aggregate stabilized bases and yet are not energy intensive.
- the mixtures of the present invention cost less than the predominantly used asphalt-aggregate bases.
- the use of mixtures of the invention releases asphalt for use in resurfacing or as a heavy industrial fuel.
- FIG. 4 is a curve showing the BTU's per mile versus thickness for various road paving materials taken from Highway Research Circular titled "Fuel Usage Factors for Highway Construction", Number 158, July, 1974. It ca be seen that asphalt concrete and cement type mixtures require substantial energy and only granular base or sub-base of aggregate has minimal energy requirements in hauling, spreading, compacting and finishing. Since the mixtures of the present invention utilize waste materials, namely, cement kiln dust and fly ash, the energy requirements for making a stabilized base are only in hauling, spreading, compacting and finishing.
- the mixtures of the present invention have minimal energy requirements and thereby obviate the energy intensive materials or prior stabilized bases.
- the mixtures of the present invention utilize cement kiln dust which is a waste product that is relatively available from cement plants and fly ash which is readily available from power plants.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Ceramic Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
- Treating Waste Gases (AREA)
- Developing Agents For Electrophotography (AREA)
- Furnace Housings, Linings, Walls, And Ceilings (AREA)
Abstract
A mixture consisting essentially of fly ash and cement kiln dust which reacts at ambient temperature with water to produce a durable mass.
Description
This application is a division of application Ser. No. 654,211, filed Feb. 2, 1976, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,018,617.
This invention relates to materials which are capable of supporting surfacing such as pavement bases.
In road paving, at one time it was thought that the base for the surfacing material should comprise a granular or gravel base. However, more recently, it has been concluded that there was a considerable difference in the performance between such bases and cement-aggregate or bituminous (asphalt)-aggregate bases. As reported in the Highway Research Board Special Report 61E, titled The AASHO Road Test, Report 5, Pavement Research, publication 954 of National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, there is a clear superiority of such treated bases over untreated bases. In recent years, treated bases have become commonly known as stabilized bases.
In subsequent work, for example, use of asphalt mixtures in all courses of pavement above the subgrade has been proposed, The Asphalt Institute, Information Series No. 146, June 1968. Asphalt stabilized bases have become the most dominant stabilized base utilized to support a flexible surfacing such as asphalt concrete. In addition, asphalt concrete has found extensive use as a resurfacing material for concrete pavement.
It has also been proposed that a lime-fly ash-aggregate stabilized base be used in road paving. Such a base consists of a mixture of proper quantities of lime, fly ash, and graded aggregate at optimum moisture content, in which the stability is greatly enhanced by the cementing action which results from complex chemical reactions between the lime and the fly ash in the presence of water.
Stabilized bases are usually employed as base courses under wearing surfaces such as hot mixed, hot laid asphaltic concrete. A wearing surface is necessary to resist the high shearing stresses which are caused by traction, but the stabilized base provides the required stability to support wheel loads.
A serious obstacle to the expanded use of stabilized bases is the high energy costs for making the materials.
For example, it is well known that the production of portland cement which is used in stabilizing bases requires substantial quantities of coal in manufacture. In fact, the United States Department of Transportation has suggested that fly ash be substituted for a portion of the portland cement utilized in concrete or cement-aggregate bases, Federal Highway Administration Notice N5080.4, Jan. 17, 1974.
The use of asphalt in asphalt-aggregate bases which is derived from petroleum processing not only utilizes petroleum which is in short supply but also requires high energy to produce them.
Similarly, the lime, fly ash and graded aggregate stabilized bases utilize lime which requires coal in production. Such bases have been used in limited geographical areas of the United States where they can compete economically because of availability of lime and fly ash.
Thus, the predominantly used stabilized bases utilize materials that are in short supply and require substantial quantities of energy to produce them. The materials may be termed energy intensive. There is a need to avoid or minimize the use of such energy intensive materials in road paving.
Accordingly, among the objects of the invention are to provide a mixture of materials for producing a stabilized base comprising a hard, strong, durable mass capable of supporting surfacing which avoids or minimizes the use of materials which are energy intensive and, moreover, utilizes materials that normally are waste materials that are readily available.
In accordance with the invention, the mixture consists essentially of fly ash and cement kiln dust which reacts at ambient temperature with water to produce a durable mass.
FIGS. 1-3 are curves of compressive strength versus age at test for various compositions.
FIG. 4 is curves of energy requirements for various pavement materials.
In accordance with the invention, the pozzolanic load supporting composition utilizes cement kiln dust.
The solid waste generated by cement manufacture is primarily kiln dust. This dust contains a mixture of raw kiln feed, partly calcined material, finely divided cement klinker and alkali sulfates (usually sulfates). There is economic value in returning the dust to the kiln, but when the alkali content of the returned dust is too high for the product klinker to meet specifications, the dust must be discarded. Up to about 15% of the raw materials processed may be collected as dust and of this about half may be low enough in alkalis to be returned to the kiln. The rest is usually stockpiled as a waste material which must be disposed and may be a nuisance and possibly a hazard.
Although the chemical reactions occurring in the resultant cement kiln dust are not well known, typical cement kiln dust has a chemical analysis as follows:
SiO2
Al2 O3
Fe2 O3
CaO
MgO
SO3
Na2 O
K2 O
Loss Ignition
More specifically, typical cement kiln dust may have the following analyses:
__________________________________________________________________________
Source
Source
Source
Source
Source
Source
Source
Source
Source
Mid-
Ingredient
A B C D E F G H I Range
__________________________________________________________________________
SiO.sub.2
28.5%
6.0%
22.4%
11.2%
13.0%
23.5%
14.8%
14.6%
14.7%
17.2%
Al.sub.2 O.sub.3
9.6 3.4 4.71
3.2 4.0 3.77
3.4 3.4 3.7 6.4
Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3
5.9 0.8 1.77
1.4 5.0 1.71
2.2 2.2 3.0 3.4
CaO 50.1
16.0
65.0
48.8
47.2
61.3
47.3
46.3
46.5
40.5
MgO 3.4 0.8 2.60
2.1 1.2 4.83
2.1 2.0 2.0 2.8
SO.sub.3
26.3
0.7 1.12
2.4 13.6
1.48
4.8 5.0 8.2 13.5
Na.sub.2 O
3.18
0.08
0.24
0.2 0.45
0.24
0.9 0.9 0.8 1.6
K.sub.2 O
26.23
1.08
1.3 4.2 2.9 1.85
4.1 5.1 3.0 13.7
Loss on
Ignition
32.0%
7.7%
2.50%
26.6%
12.9%
1.84%
21.1%
21.4%
18.2%
17.2%
__________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________
RANGE
Ingredient
Low % High % Average %
______________________________________
SiO.sub.2
6.0 28.5 16.5
Al.sub.2 O.sub.3
3.2 9.6 4.35
Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3
0.8 5.9 2.66
CaO 16.0 65.0 47.6
MgO 0.8 4.83 2.34
SO.sub.3
0.7 26.3 7.07
Na.sub.2 O
0.08 3.18 0.78
K.sub.2 O
1.08 26.23 5.52
Loss on
Ignition
2.50 32.0 16.0
______________________________________
When mixtures made in accordance with the invention and mixed with water to produce a pozzolanic reaction have been tested in accordance with the specifications given in ASTM C-593 for fly ash and other pozzolans for use with lime, it has been found that the compositions meet or exceed the specifications.
The term "fly ash" as used in connection with stabilized bases is well known and as used herein is intended to indicate the finely divided ash residue produced by the combustion of pulverized coal or lignite, which ash is carried off with the gases exhausted from the furnace in which the coal is burned and which is collected from these gases usually by means of suitable precipitation apparatus such as electrical precipitators. Those finely pulverized ashes resulting from combustion of oil and from combustion of waste materials in a large incinerator or natural pozzolans can also be utilized in the methods described herein providing their chemical compositions are reasonably similar to pulverized coal fly ashes. The fly ash so obtained is in a finely divided state such that usually at least 70% by weight passes through a 200-mesh sieve, although incinerator ashes may be considerably coarser. Fly ash may be considered an "artificial pozzolan", as distinguished from a "natural pozzolan".
The term "aggregate" as used in connection with load supporting compositions is also well known and refers to natural or artificial inorganic materials most of which are substantially chemically inert with respect to fly ash and lime, and substantially insoluble in water. Typically, aggregate may comprise limestone, sand, blast furnace slag, gravel, synthetic aggregate and other similar material.
Aggregates can comprise a wide range of types and gradations, including sands, gravels, crushed stones, and several types of slag. Aggregates should be of such gradation that, when mixed with cement kiln dust, fly ash and water, the resulting mixture is mechanically stable under compaction equipment and capable of being compacted in the field to high density. The aggregate should be free from deleterious organic or chemical substances which may interfere with the desired chemical reaction between the cement kiln dust, fly ash and water. Further, the aggregate should preferably consist of hard, durable particles, free from soft or disintegrated pieces.
It has been found that a preferable mixture comprises:
______________________________________
Percent by
Dry Weight
______________________________________
Cement Kiln Dust
8.0%
Fly Ash 12.0%
Aggregate 80.0%
Total 100.0%
______________________________________
However, the mixture for use in road stabilizer bases may preferably vary as follows:
______________________________________
Percent By
Dry Weight
______________________________________
Cement Kiln Dust
4-16%
Fly Ash 6-24%
Aggregate 60-90%
______________________________________
As indicated above, tests were conducted in accordance with ASTM C-593. More specifically, the test specimens were molded using a mechanical compactor, having a 10 pound hammer with an 18 inch drop. The material was placed in the molds in three equal layers, and compacted by 25 blows per layer. The machine has a revolving turntable to evenly distribute the blows over the surface of the layer being compacted.
After molding, the samples were carefully removed from the molds, weighed, and sealed in plastic bag, labeled for identification, and placed in a constant temperature oven at 100° F. to cure until tested. Two cylinders of each mix were marked for testing at 7, 14 and 28 days of curing. After removal from the oven, the samples are submerged in water for four hours, removed, and allowed to drain on a non-absorbant surface, capped, and tested within one hour after removal from the water. The capping compound used is "Hydro-Stone" a lime based, quick-hardening compound. Plate glass was used to obtain even, parallel caps on the test specimens.
Examples of various tests and compositions are as follows:
EXAMPLE I
__________________________________________________________________________
Weight of
Percent Batch
__________________________________________________________________________
Cement Kiln Dust
8.0% 2.4#
Fly Ash 12.0% 3.6#
Limestone 80.0% 24.0#
Total 100.0% 30.0#
__________________________________________________________________________
Specimen
Percent
Wt. As Wet Wt.
Dry Wt.
Area Date
Mach.
No. Water
Molded (Lbs.)
Per Cu. Ft.
Per Cu. Ft.
(Sq. In.)
Tested
Load
P.S.I.
__________________________________________________________________________
A 10.8 4.73 141.9 128.1 12.57
10-16
13,140
1050
B 10.8 4.72 141.6 127.8 12.57
10-16
14,370
1140
C 10.8 4.73 141.9 128.1 12.57
10-23
15,780
1260
D 10.8 4.73 141.9 128.1 12.57
10-23
15,530
1240
E 10.8 4.73 141.9 128.1 12.57
11-06
17,800
1420
F 10.8 4.73 141.9 128.1 12.57
11-06
17,800
1420
__________________________________________________________________________
Remarks:
Slight bleeding at bottom of mold.
EXAMPLE II
__________________________________________________________________________
Weight of
Percent Batch
__________________________________________________________________________
Cement Kiln Dust
8.0% 2.4#
Fly Ash 12.0% 3.6#
Limestone 80.0% 24.0#
Retarder -- 0.96 oz
Total 100.0% 30.0#
__________________________________________________________________________
Specimen
Percent
Wt. As Wet Wt.
Dry Wt.
Area Date
Mach.
No. Water
Molded (Lbs.)
Per Cu. Ft.
Per Cu. Ft.
(Sq. In.)
Tested
Load
P.S.I.
__________________________________________________________________________
A 10.1 4.73 141.9 128.9 12.57
10-16
-- --
B 10.1 4.73 141.9 128.9 12.57
10-16
-- --
C 10.2 4.73 141.9 128.8 12.57
10-23
1,650
130
D 10.2 4.73 141.9 128.8 12.57
10-23
1,930
150
E 10.3 4.73 141.9 128.6 12.57
11-06
2,300
180
F 10.3 4.73 141.9 128.6 12.57
11-06
2,100
170
__________________________________________________________________________
Remarks:
Slight bleeding.
Samples 2A and 2B fell apart during the four (4) hour soaking. There was
no intact sample to subject to the compression test.
Samples C, D, E, and F were not subjected to the four (4) hour soaking,
prior to testing.
EXAMPLE III
__________________________________________________________________________
Weight of
Percent Batch
__________________________________________________________________________
Cement Kiln Dust 8.0% 2.4#
Fly Ash 12.0% 3.6#
Limestone 80.0% 24.0#
Calcium Chloride Solution
-- (0.24#)
Total 100.0% 30.0#
__________________________________________________________________________
Specimen
Percent
Wt. As Wet Wt.
Dry Wt.
Area Date
Mach.
No. Water
Molded (Lbs.)
Per Cu. Ft.
Per Cu. Ft.
(Sq. in.)
Tested
Load
P.S.I.
__________________________________________________________________________
A 10.4 4.77 143.1 129.6 12.57
10-16
15,160
1210
B 10.4 4.77 143.1 129.6 12.57
10-16
15,750
1250
C 10.0 4.73 141.9 129.0 12.57
10-23
17,250
1370
D 9.9 4.73 141.9 129.1 12.57
10-23
18,950
1510
E 9.8 4.73 141.9 129.2 12.57
11-06
20,600
1640
F 9.7 4.72 141.6 129.1 12.57
11-06
20,700
1650
__________________________________________________________________________
Remarks:
Slight bleeding
EXAMPLE IV
__________________________________________________________________________
Weight of
Percent Batch
__________________________________________________________________________
Cement Kiln Dust
8.0% 2.4#
Stack Dust 3.0% 0.9#
Fly Ash 12.0% 3.6#
Limestone 77.0% 23.1#
Total 100.0% 30.0#
__________________________________________________________________________
Specimen
Percent
Wt. As Wet Wt.
Dry Wt.
Area Date
Mach.
No. Water
Molded (Lbs.)
Per Cu. Ft.
Per Cu. Ft.
(Sq. In.)
Tested
Load
P.S.I.
__________________________________________________________________________
A 8.5 4.53 135.9 125.3 12.57
10-17
8,200
652
B 8.5 4.54 136.2 125.5 12.57
10-17
8,900
708
C 8.7 4.58 137.4 126.4 12.57
10-24
10,950
871
D 8.8 4.56 136.8 125.7 12.57
10-24
11,775
937
E 9.0 4.58 137.4 126.1 12.57
11-07
16,050
1280
F 9.0 4.56 136.8 125.5 12.57
11-07
14,850
1180
__________________________________________________________________________
Remarks:
No bleeding.
EXAMPLE V
__________________________________________________________________________
Weight of
Percent Batch
__________________________________________________________________________
Cement Kiln Dust
12.0% 3.6#
Fly Ash 88.0% 26.4#
Total 100.0% 30.0#
__________________________________________________________________________
Specimen
Percent
Wt. As Wet Wt.
Dry Wt.
Area Date
Mach.
No. Water
Molded (Lbs.)
Per Cu. Ft.
Per Cu. Ft.
(Sq. In.)
Tested
Load
P.S.I.
__________________________________________________________________________
A 9.5 2.87 86.1 78.6 12.57
10-17
2,350
187
B 9.7 2.90 87.0 79.3 12.57
10-17
2,300
183
C 9.7 2.90 87.0 79.3 12.57
10-24
2,075
165
D 9.7 2.90 87.0 79.3 12.57
10-24
1,900
151
E 9.7 2.90 87.0 79.3 12.57
11-07
3,040
240
F 10.0 2.96 88.8 80.7 12.57
11-07
3,230
260
__________________________________________________________________________
Remarks:
Had difficulty in reaching the desired moisture content because of the
dust's extremely dry condition. Extremely "fluffy" material.
EXAMPLE VI
__________________________________________________________________________
Weight of
Percent Batch
__________________________________________________________________________
Cement Kiln Dust 8.0% 2.4#
Fly Ash 8.0% 2.4#
Limestone 79.0% 23.7#
Limestone Fines 5.0% 1.5#
Total 100.0% 30.0#
Water added: 1158 + 136 = 1294
__________________________________________________________________________
Specimen
Percent
Wt. As Wet Wt.
Dry Wt.
Area Date
Mach.
No. Water
Molded (Lbs.)
Per Cu. Ft.
Per Cu. Ft.
(Sq. In.)
Tested
Load
P.S.I.
__________________________________________________________________________
A 9.8 4.85 145.5 132.5 12.57
10-20
13,900
1110
B 9.8 4.81 144.3 131.4 12.57
10-20
15,000
1190
C 9.8 4.79 143.7 130.9 12.57
10-27
17,350
1380
D 9.9 4.81 144.3 131.3 12.57
10-27
18,200
1448
E 9.9 4.81 144.3 131.3 12.57
11-10
17,050
1356
F 9.9 4.78 143.4 130.5 12.57
11-10
16,600
1321
__________________________________________________________________________
Remarks:
Good compactability. Material was relatively easy to work with.
EXAMPLE VII
__________________________________________________________________________
Weight of
Percent
Batch
__________________________________________________________________________
Fly Ash 8.0% 2.40#
Kiln Dust 10.0% 3.00#
No. 304 Limestone
82.0% 24.60#
(Screened over 3/4" screen)
Total 100.0%
30.00#
__________________________________________________________________________
Cyl.
Percent
Wt. As Wet Wt.
Dry Wt.
Area Date
Mach.
No.
Water
Molded(Lbs.)
Per Cu. Ft.
Per Cu. Ft.
(Sq. In.)
Tested
Load
P.S.I.
__________________________________________________________________________
1 11.5 4.73 141.9 127.3 12.57
4-01
9350
745
2 11.1 4.71 141.3 127.2 12.57
4-01
8610
685
3 11.1 4.73 141.9 127.7 12.57
4-01
9290
740
4 11.1 4.74 142.2 128.1 12.57
4-22
14050
1120
5 11.0 4.75 142.5 128.4 12.57
4-22
13500
1075
6 10.7 4.74 142.2 128.5 12.57
4-22
13620
1085
__________________________________________________________________________
A. Slight bleeding at bottom of mold during compaction.
B. Material appeared deficient in limestone fines (#4 material).
C. Some free moisture noted, giving slight "glossy" appearance.
D. Samples slumped, following extraction from molds.
EXAMPLE VIII
__________________________________________________________________________
Weight of
Percent
Batch
__________________________________________________________________________
Fly Ash 10.0% 3.00#
Kiln Dust 8.0% 2.40#
No. 304 Limestone
82.0% 24.60#
(Screened over 3/4" screen)
Total 100.0 30.00#
__________________________________________________________________________
Cyl.
Percent
Wt. As Wet Wt.
Dry Wt.
Area Date
Mach.
No.
Water
Molded (Lbs.)
Per Cu. Ft.
Per Cu. Ft.
(Sq. In.)
Tested
Load
P.S.I.
__________________________________________________________________________
1 9.3 4.72 141.6 129.6 12.57
4-01
8060
640
2 9.4 4.71 141.3 129.2 12.57
4-01
7750
615
3 9.4 4.71 141.3 129.2 12.57
4-01
8000
635
4 9.5 4.69 140.7 128.5 12.57
4-22
9730
775
5 9.6 4.68 140.4 128.1 12.57
4-22
10450
830
6 9.5 4.69 140.7 128.5 12.57
4-22
11490
915
__________________________________________________________________________
A. Samples retained shape following extraction from molds.
B. No free water noticed bleeding during compaction.
EXAMPLE IX
__________________________________________________________________________
Weight of
Percent Batch
__________________________________________________________________________
Fly Ash 8.0% 2.40#
Kiln Dust 10.0% 3.00#
Fill Sand 82.0% 24.60#
Total 100.0% 30.00#
__________________________________________________________________________
Cyl.
Percent
Wt. As Wet Wt.
Dry Wt.
Area Date
Mach.
No.
Water
Molded (Lbs.)
Per Cu. Ft.
Per Cu. Ft.
(Sq. In.)
Tested
Load
P.S.I.
__________________________________________________________________________
1 9.8 4.09 122.7 111.7 12.57
3-31
1800
145
2 10.0 4.12 123.6 112.4 12.57
3-31
1700
135
3 9.9 4.10 123.0 111.9 12.57
3-31
1690
135
4 9.9 4.11 123.3 112.2 12.57
4-21
2810
225
5 10.0 4.10 123.0 111.8 12.57
4-21
2880
230
6 9.8 4.09 122.7 111.7 12.57
4-21
2670
210
__________________________________________________________________________
A. No bleeding of sample during compaction.
B. Material stayed in a ball when packed by hand.
C. Slight bulking noticed.
D. Easily compacted.
EXAMPLE X
__________________________________________________________________________
Weight of
Percent Batch
__________________________________________________________________________
Fly Ash 8.0% 2.40#
Kiln Dust 10.0% 3.00#
Glass (Crushed to approx.
1/2" size) 32.0% 9.60#
Fill Sand 50.0% 15.00#
Total 100.0% 30.00#
__________________________________________________________________________
Cyl.
Percent
Wt. As Wet Wt.
Dry Wt.
Area Date
Mach.
No.
Water
Molded (Lbs.)
Per Cu. Ft.
Per Cu. Ft.
(Sq. In.)
Tested
Load
P.S.I.
__________________________________________________________________________
1 9.4 4.50 135.0 123.4 12.57
4-02
4390
350
2 9.4 4.50 135.0 123.4 12.57
4-02
4590
365
3 9.3 4.51 135.3 123.8 12.57
4-02
4200
335
4 9.2 4.52 135.6 124.2 12.57
4-23
6750
535
5 9.1 4.51 135.3 124.0 12.57
4-23
6870
545
6 9.1 4.47 134.1 122.9 12.57
4-23
6280
500
__________________________________________________________________________
A. Material originally mixed to 10.3% moisture, looked wet, probably
because nonabsorbancy of glass.
B. Air dried the mix out to approximately 9.4% moisture, did not bulk at
this moisture content.
C. Surprisingly good cohesion of mix, even with the smooth faces of glass
particles.
D. Strength of cylinders higher than expected, thought the mix would slip
off the smooth glass faces, when put under compression.
EXAMPLE XI
__________________________________________________________________________
Weight of
Percent Batch
__________________________________________________________________________
Cement Kiln Dust
16.0 3.2#
Fly Ash 24.0 4.8#
No. 304 Crushed Limestone
60.0 12.0#
Total 100.0 20.0#
__________________________________________________________________________
Specimen
Percent
Wt. As Wet Wt.
Dry Wt.
Area Date
Mach.
No. Water
Molded (Lbs.)
Per Cu. Ft.
Per Cu. Ft.
(Sq. In.)
Tested
Load
P.S.I.
__________________________________________________________________________
A 16.6 4.50 135.0 115.8 12.57
12/22
5890
470
B 15.1 4.46 133.8 116.2 12.57
12/22
6000
480
C 15.0 4.46 133.8 116.3 12.57
12/22
6150
490
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE XII
__________________________________________________________________________
Weight of
Percent Batch
__________________________________________________________________________
Cement Kiln Dust
4.0 0.8#
Fly Ash 6.0 1.2#
No. 304 Crushed Limestone
90.0 18.0#
Total 100.0 20.0#
__________________________________________________________________________
Specimen
Percent
Wt. As Wet Wt.
Dry Wt.
Area Date
Mach.
No. Water
Molded (Lbs.)
Per Cu. Ft.
Per Cu. Ft.
(Sq. In.)
Tested
Load
P.S.I.
__________________________________________________________________________
A 11.1 4.94 148.2 133.4 12.57
12/22
2950
230
B 11.2 4.93 147.9 133.0 12.57
12/22
3570
280
C 11.2 4.93 147.9 133.0 12.57
12/22
3250
260
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE XIII
__________________________________________________________________________
Weight of
Percent Batch
__________________________________________________________________________
Cement Kiln Dust
6.9% 140#
Fly Ash 11.8% 240#
Limestone Screenings
39.4% 800#
No. 57 Crushed Limestone
39.4% 800#
Water 2.5% 50#
Total 100.0% 2030#
__________________________________________________________________________
Specimen
Percent
Wt. As Wet Wt.
Dry Wt.
Area Date Mach.
No. Water
Molded (Lbs.)
Per Cu. Ft.
Per Cu. Ft.
(Sq. In.)
Tested Load
P.S.I.
__________________________________________________________________________
A 5.6 4.49 134.7 127.6 12.57
11-22 8,950
712
B 5.1 4.51 135.3 128.7 12.57
11-22 8,225
654
C 5.5 4.51 135.3 128.2 12.57
11-22 9,050
720
D 5.4 4.50 135.0 128.1 12.57
11-29 9,610
760
E 5.5 4.49 134.7 127.7 12.57
11-29 8,080
640
F 4.9 4.50 135.0 128.7 12.57
11-29 9,630
770
G 5.1 4.46 133.8 127.3 12.57
12-13 8,820
700
H 5.3 4.51 135.3 128.5 12.57
12-13 9,380
750
I 5.4 4.50 135.0 128.1 12.57
12-13 9,400
750
J 5.3 4.46 133.8 127.1 12.57
02-03
K 5.1 4.51 135.3 128.7 12.57
02-03
L 4.9 4.48 134.4 128.1 12.57
02-03
M 5.0 4.54 136.2 129.7 12.57
For Durablilty Test
N 4.9 4.54 136.2 129.8 12.57
For Durability Test
O 4.8 4.47 134.1 128.0 12.57
For Durability Test
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE XIV
__________________________________________________________________________
Weight of
Percent Batch
__________________________________________________________________________
Cement Type I
1.0% 20#
Cement Kiln Dust
6.8% 140#
Fly Ash 11.7% 240#
Limestone Screenings
39.0% 800#
No. 57 Crushed Limestone
39.0% 800#
Water 2.5% 50#
Total 100.0% 1050#
__________________________________________________________________________
Specimen
Percent
Wt. As Wet Wt.
Dry Wt.
Area Date Mach.
No. Water
Molded (Lbs.)
Per Cu. Ft.
Per Cu. Ft.
(Sq. In.)
Tested Load
P.S.I.
__________________________________________________________________________
A 5.4 4.58 137.4 130.4 12.57
11-21 10,030
800
B 5.4 4.58 137.4 130.4 12.57
11-21 11,780
940
C 5.4 4.58 137.4 130.4 12.57
11-21 14,120
1120
D 5.3 4.58 137.4 130.5 12.57
11-28 15,500
1230
E 5.0 4.58 137.4 130.9 12.57
11-28 18,500
1470
F 5.8 4.46 133.8 126.5 12.57
11-29 14,910
1190
G 5.8 4.46 133.8 126.5 12.57
12-13 17,900
1420
H 5.7 4.46 133.8 126.6 12.57
12-13 20,010
1590
I 5.7 4.46 133.8 126.6 12.57
12-13 14,980
1190
J 5.7 4.46 133.8 126.6 12.57
02-13
K 5.6 4.46 133.8 126.7 12.57
02-13
L 5.6 4.46 133.8 126.7 12.57
02-13
M 5.4 4.49 134.7 127.8 12.57
For Durability Test
N 5.4 4.49 134.7 127.8 12.57
For Durability Test
O 5.4 4.49 134.7 127.8 12.57
For Durability Test
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE XV
__________________________________________________________________________
Weight of
Percent Batch
__________________________________________________________________________
Cement Kiln Dust
7.8% 160#
Fly Ash 11.7% 240#
Limestone Screenings
39.0% 800#
No. 57 Crushed Limestone
39.0% 800#
Water 2.5% 50#
Total 100.0% 2050#
__________________________________________________________________________
Specimen
Percent
Wt. As Wet Wt.
Dry Wt.
Area Date Mach.
No. Water
Molded(Lbs.)
Per Cu. Ft.
Per Cu. Ft.
(Sq. In.)
Tested Load
P.S.I.
__________________________________________________________________________
A 8.1 4.24 127.2 117.7 12.57
11-22 4,650
370*
B 7.9 4.24 127.2 117.9 12.57
11-22 5,700
450
C 8.3 4.29 128.7 118.8 12.57
11-22 6,030
D 7.8 4.25 127.5 118.3 12.57
11-29 7,200
570
E 7.7 4.24 127.2 118.1 12.57
11-29 6,850
540
F 7.6 4.26 127.8 118.8 12.57
11-29 8,080
640
G 7.6 4.30 129.0 119.9 12.57
12-13 10,000
800
H 7.6 4.27 128.1 119.0 12.57
12-13 9,500
760
I 7.6 4.27 128.1 119.0 12.57
12-13 8,980
710
J 7.5 4.27 128.1 119.2 12.57
02-13
K 7.3 4.28 128.4 119.7 12.57
02-13
L 7.2 4.26 127.8 119.2 12.57
02-13
M 7.2 4.27 128.1 119.5 12.57
For Durability Test
N 7.1 4.24 127.2 118.8 12.57
For Durability Test
O 7.2 4.25 127.5 118.9 12.57
For Durability Test
__________________________________________________________________________
*Sample fractured horizontally during capping
Remarks:
This product was produced on November 6, and sampled on November 13.
Materials are the same as in Example XIII This example is a check to see
if the age of the product, before use, has any effect on the strength
results.
EXAMPLE XVI
__________________________________________________________________________
Weight of
Percent Batch
__________________________________________________________________________
Fly Ash 11.6% 232#
Lime 3.4% 68#
No. 304 Crushed Limestone
85.0% 1700#
Water -- --
Total 100.0% 2000#
__________________________________________________________________________
Specimen
Percent
Wt. As Wet Wt.
Dry Wt.
Area Date Mach.
No. Water
Molded(Lbs.)
Per Cu. Ft.
Per Cu. Ft.
(Sq. In.)
Tested Load
P.S.I.
__________________________________________________________________________
A 10.4 4.60 138.0 125.0 12.57
11-28 10,325
820
B 10.4 4.70 141.0 127.7 12.57
11-28 11,950
950
C 10.2 4.62 138.6 125.8 12.57
11-28 10,650
850
D 10.2 4.67 140.1 127.1 12.57
12-05 19,600
1559
E 10.2 4.66 139.8 126.9 12.57
12-05 18,950
1508
F 11.1 4.65 139.5 125.6 12.57
12-05 19,825
1577
G 10.8 4.66 139.8 126.2 12.57
12-19 21,860
1740
H 10.8 4.66 139.8 126.2 12.57
12-19 20,790
1650
I 10.8 4.64 139.2 125.6 12.57
12-19 21,000
1670
J 10.8 4.70 141.0 127.3 12.57
02-19
K 10.9 4.65 139.5 125.8 12.57
02-19
L 10.9 4.68 140.4 126.6 12.57
02-19
M 10.9 4.66 139.8 126.1 12.57
For Durability Test
N 10.9 4.68 140.4 126.6 12.57
For Durability Test
O 9.6 4.63 138.9 126.7 12.57
For Durability Test
__________________________________________________________________________
The results of the tests are summarized in FIGS. 1-3.
As shown in FIG. 1, mixtures containing cement kiln dust vary but in each instant produce a base that is stabilized.
As shown in FIG. 2, the addition of additives or admixtures generally do not affect the strength except that a retarder tends to prevent the early development of strength as might be expected.
As shown in FIG. 3, the strength of mixtures including cement kiln dust compare favorably with a lime, fly ash, aggregate mixture. In addition, even a mixture of cement kiln dust and fly ash produces a stabilized base.
Thus, the mixtures of the present invention result in a stabilized base that is comparable in strength and required performance characteristics to cement-aggregate or lime-fly ash-aggregate stabilized bases and yet are not energy intensive. The mixtures of the present invention cost less than the predominantly used asphalt-aggregate bases. Also, the use of mixtures of the invention releases asphalt for use in resurfacing or as a heavy industrial fuel.
FIG. 4 is a curve showing the BTU's per mile versus thickness for various road paving materials taken from Highway Research Circular titled "Fuel Usage Factors for Highway Construction", Number 158, July, 1974. It ca be seen that asphalt concrete and cement type mixtures require substantial energy and only granular base or sub-base of aggregate has minimal energy requirements in hauling, spreading, compacting and finishing. Since the mixtures of the present invention utilize waste materials, namely, cement kiln dust and fly ash, the energy requirements for making a stabilized base are only in hauling, spreading, compacting and finishing.
As a result, the mixtures of the present invention have minimal energy requirements and thereby obviate the energy intensive materials or prior stabilized bases.
The mixtures of the present invention utilize cement kiln dust which is a waste product that is relatively available from cement plants and fly ash which is readily available from power plants.
Claims (8)
1. A mixture consisting essentially of fly ash and cement kiln dust.
2. The mixture set forth in claim 1 including an amount of portland cement.
3. The mixture set forth in claim 1 wherein said cement kiln dust comprises about 12% by dry weight and said fly ash comprises about 88% by dry weight.
4. The method which comprises mixing fly ash, cement kiln dust and water and permitting the mixture to react at ambient temperatures to produce a durable mass.
5. The method set forth in claim 4 wherein said .[.fly ash.]. .Iadd.cement kiln dust .Iaddend.comprises about 12% by dry weight of the total of fly ash and cement kiln dust and the .[.cement kiln dust.]. .Iadd.fly ash .Iaddend.comprises about 88% by dry weight of the total of fly ash and cement kiln dust.
6. The mixture set forth in claim 1 including about 1% portland cement.
7. The mixture set forth in claim 1 wherein the fly ash comprises the major constituent.
8. The method set forth in claim 4 including mixing about 1% portland cement with said fly ash and cement kiln dust.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US06/068,412 USRE30943E (en) | 1976-02-02 | 1979-08-21 | Stabilized mixture |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US05/654,211 US4018617A (en) | 1976-02-02 | 1976-02-02 | Mixture for pavement bases and the like |
| US05/765,837 US4101332A (en) | 1976-02-02 | 1977-02-04 | Stabilized mixture |
| US06/068,412 USRE30943E (en) | 1976-02-02 | 1979-08-21 | Stabilized mixture |
Related Parent Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US05/654,211 Division US4018617A (en) | 1976-02-02 | 1976-02-02 | Mixture for pavement bases and the like |
| US05/765,837 Reissue US4101332A (en) | 1976-02-02 | 1977-02-04 | Stabilized mixture |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| USRE30943E true USRE30943E (en) | 1982-05-25 |
Family
ID=27371331
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US06/068,412 Expired - Lifetime USRE30943E (en) | 1976-02-02 | 1979-08-21 | Stabilized mixture |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | USRE30943E (en) |
Cited By (16)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4715896A (en) | 1986-08-04 | 1987-12-29 | Standard Slag Cement | Cementitious binder for consolidated fill |
| US4772330A (en) | 1986-02-14 | 1988-09-20 | Ube Industries, Ltd. | Process for producing low water-absorption artificial lightweight aggregate |
| US4917733A (en) | 1988-11-14 | 1990-04-17 | Hansen David L | Pozzolanic mixture for stabilizing landfill leachate |
| US4997484A (en) * | 1987-12-11 | 1991-03-05 | Lone Star Industries, Inc. | Hydraulic cement and composition employing the same |
| US5211750A (en) * | 1991-06-19 | 1993-05-18 | Conversion Systems, Inc. | Synthetic aggregate and landfill method |
| US5256197A (en) * | 1991-06-19 | 1993-10-26 | Conversion Systems, Inc. | Abrasion-resistant synthetic article and method of making |
| US5277826A (en) * | 1991-11-01 | 1994-01-11 | Browning Ferris Industries | Lime and fly ash stabilization of wastewater treatment sludge |
| US5366548A (en) * | 1991-07-05 | 1994-11-22 | Riddle Mitchell S | Volcanic fly ash and kiln dust compositions, and a process for making articles therefrom |
| US5374307A (en) * | 1991-07-05 | 1994-12-20 | Riddle; Mitchell S. | Fly ash composition and process for making articles therefrom |
| US5383521A (en) * | 1993-04-01 | 1995-01-24 | Halliburton Company | Fly ash cementing compositions and methods |
| US6053857A (en) | 1998-05-15 | 2000-04-25 | Conversion Systems, Inc. | Immobilization of thallium during electric arc furnace dust treatment |
| US6200379B1 (en) | 1995-09-08 | 2001-03-13 | Midway Environmental Associates, Inc. | Fly ash composites and methods for making same |
| US6387175B1 (en) | 2000-10-05 | 2002-05-14 | Bethlehem Steel Corporation | Roadway base intermediate, roadway base, and methods of manufacture |
| US6645290B1 (en) * | 2001-10-09 | 2003-11-11 | Ronald Lee Barbour | Settable composition containing cement kiln dust |
| US20080300442A1 (en) * | 2007-05-31 | 2008-12-04 | Utter Technology, Llc | Method for forming products from a flue gas desulfurization by-product and products formed thereby |
| US20120055374A1 (en) * | 2010-09-03 | 2012-03-08 | Spence William B | Fly ash used in construction application |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US2564690A (en) * | 1948-06-30 | 1951-08-21 | Jules E Havelin | Hydrated lime-fly ash-fine aggregate cement |
| US3669701A (en) * | 1970-10-29 | 1972-06-13 | Cities Service Oil Co | Lightweight cements for oil wells |
| US3852084A (en) * | 1970-03-30 | 1974-12-03 | C Smith | Cementitious composition containing activated lime-fly ash mixture |
-
1979
- 1979-08-21 US US06/068,412 patent/USRE30943E/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US2564690A (en) * | 1948-06-30 | 1951-08-21 | Jules E Havelin | Hydrated lime-fly ash-fine aggregate cement |
| US3852084A (en) * | 1970-03-30 | 1974-12-03 | C Smith | Cementitious composition containing activated lime-fly ash mixture |
| US3669701A (en) * | 1970-10-29 | 1972-06-13 | Cities Service Oil Co | Lightweight cements for oil wells |
Cited By (21)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4772330A (en) | 1986-02-14 | 1988-09-20 | Ube Industries, Ltd. | Process for producing low water-absorption artificial lightweight aggregate |
| US4715896A (en) | 1986-08-04 | 1987-12-29 | Standard Slag Cement | Cementitious binder for consolidated fill |
| US4997484A (en) * | 1987-12-11 | 1991-03-05 | Lone Star Industries, Inc. | Hydraulic cement and composition employing the same |
| US4917733A (en) | 1988-11-14 | 1990-04-17 | Hansen David L | Pozzolanic mixture for stabilizing landfill leachate |
| US5211750A (en) * | 1991-06-19 | 1993-05-18 | Conversion Systems, Inc. | Synthetic aggregate and landfill method |
| US5256197A (en) * | 1991-06-19 | 1993-10-26 | Conversion Systems, Inc. | Abrasion-resistant synthetic article and method of making |
| US5405441A (en) * | 1991-07-05 | 1995-04-11 | Tide Company | Fly ash composition and process for making articles therefrom |
| US5366548A (en) * | 1991-07-05 | 1994-11-22 | Riddle Mitchell S | Volcanic fly ash and kiln dust compositions, and a process for making articles therefrom |
| US5374307A (en) * | 1991-07-05 | 1994-12-20 | Riddle; Mitchell S. | Fly ash composition and process for making articles therefrom |
| US5425807A (en) * | 1991-07-05 | 1995-06-20 | Tide Company | Volcanic fly ash and kiln dust compositions and a process for making articles therefrom |
| US5277826A (en) * | 1991-11-01 | 1994-01-11 | Browning Ferris Industries | Lime and fly ash stabilization of wastewater treatment sludge |
| US5383521A (en) * | 1993-04-01 | 1995-01-24 | Halliburton Company | Fly ash cementing compositions and methods |
| US6200379B1 (en) | 1995-09-08 | 2001-03-13 | Midway Environmental Associates, Inc. | Fly ash composites and methods for making same |
| US6053857A (en) | 1998-05-15 | 2000-04-25 | Conversion Systems, Inc. | Immobilization of thallium during electric arc furnace dust treatment |
| US6387175B1 (en) | 2000-10-05 | 2002-05-14 | Bethlehem Steel Corporation | Roadway base intermediate, roadway base, and methods of manufacture |
| US6645290B1 (en) * | 2001-10-09 | 2003-11-11 | Ronald Lee Barbour | Settable composition containing cement kiln dust |
| US20080300442A1 (en) * | 2007-05-31 | 2008-12-04 | Utter Technology, Llc | Method for forming products from a flue gas desulfurization by-product and products formed thereby |
| US8303842B2 (en) | 2007-05-31 | 2012-11-06 | Utter Technology, Llc | Method for forming products from a flue gas desulfurization by-product and products formed thereby |
| US8669203B2 (en) | 2007-05-31 | 2014-03-11 | Utter Technology Llc | Method for forming products from a flue gas desulfurization by-product and products formed thereby |
| US9896387B2 (en) | 2007-05-31 | 2018-02-20 | Utter Technology, Llc | Products from a flue gas desulfurization by-product |
| US20120055374A1 (en) * | 2010-09-03 | 2012-03-08 | Spence William B | Fly ash used in construction application |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US4101332A (en) | Stabilized mixture | |
| US4018617A (en) | Mixture for pavement bases and the like | |
| US4038095A (en) | Mixture for pavement bases and the like | |
| USRE30943E (en) | Stabilized mixture | |
| Kumar et al. | Uses of bottom ash in the replacement of fine aggregate for making concrete | |
| US6645290B1 (en) | Settable composition containing cement kiln dust | |
| US3076717A (en) | Compositions for building load supporting surfaces | |
| US5211750A (en) | Synthetic aggregate and landfill method | |
| US3230103A (en) | Non-plastic composition containing pozzolan, lime and blast furnace slag | |
| US4373958A (en) | Road base stabilization using lime kiln dust | |
| US5484479A (en) | Method of manufacturing synthetic aggregate | |
| RU2455414C1 (en) | Method to manufacture building material and method to erect motor road beds and surface structures on its basis | |
| US3776748A (en) | Method of preparing surfacing composition for roads;airfield runways and the like | |
| US3642509A (en) | Hydraulic composition | |
| Ojha et al. | Study on effect of fly ash and limestone powder on compressive strength of roller compacted concrete for dam construction | |
| US3824109A (en) | Roads,airfield runways and the like | |
| EP0588872A4 (en) | Process for forming solid aggregates including shaped articles. | |
| Ratchakrom | The effect of bottom ash and kaolin on the strength of poor subbase | |
| EP0967186A2 (en) | A particular material suitable for use in construction and methods of making same | |
| Hidei et al. | Application of wastepaper sludge ash as mineral powder for hot asphalt concrete mix | |
| SU1565862A1 (en) | Method of preparing asphalt-concrete mixture | |
| Barnes | Pavement thickness design using reclaimed hydrated Iowa Class C fly ash as a base material | |
| CN116354655B (en) | Environmentally friendly coal gangue-based all-solid waste road base mixture and preparation method thereof | |
| RU2813822C1 (en) | Concrete mixture | |
| Auwal et al. | THE SUITABILITY OF ANIMAL BONE ASH AS PARTIAL REPLACEMENT OF CEMENT IN CONCRETE PRODUCTION |