US20190094234A1 - Kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilization - Google Patents
Kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilization Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20190094234A1 US20190094234A1 US16/201,184 US201816201184A US2019094234A1 US 20190094234 A1 US20190094234 A1 US 20190094234A1 US 201816201184 A US201816201184 A US 201816201184A US 2019094234 A1 US2019094234 A1 US 2019094234A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- csf
- implantation
- oocyte
- embryos
- oocytes
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000002513 implantation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 126
- 230000004720 fertilization Effects 0.000 title claims description 51
- 108010017080 Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 172
- 102000004269 Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 170
- 210000001733 follicular fluid Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 153
- 210000000287 oocyte Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 115
- 210000002257 embryonic structure Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 79
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 49
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 claims description 42
- 210000001161 mammalian embryo Anatomy 0.000 claims description 42
- 238000004128 high performance liquid chromatography Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000004949 mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000002965 ELISA Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000005251 capillar electrophoresis Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000002866 fluorescence resonance energy transfer Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000003127 radioimmunoassay Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000002198 surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000000225 bioluminescence resonance energy transfer Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000002875 fluorescence polarization Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000010791 quenching Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000000171 quenching effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000004885 tandem mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000001502 gel electrophoresis Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 claims description 2
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000003547 immunosorbent Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 31
- 238000009739 binding Methods 0.000 description 19
- 230000027455 binding Effects 0.000 description 18
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 15
- 239000003446 ligand Substances 0.000 description 14
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 12
- 238000003018 immunoassay Methods 0.000 description 12
- 102000004127 Cytokines Human genes 0.000 description 11
- 108090000695 Cytokines Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 9
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 9
- 239000007943 implant Substances 0.000 description 8
- 230000035935 pregnancy Effects 0.000 description 8
- 108020004999 messenger RNA Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 108010021625 Immunoglobulin Fragments Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 102000008394 Immunoglobulin Fragments Human genes 0.000 description 6
- 210000002503 granulosa cell Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 6
- 210000001325 yolk sac Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000035558 fertility Effects 0.000 description 5
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 108091032973 (ribonucleotides)n+m Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102000008102 Ankyrins Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108010049777 Ankyrins Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 108091023037 Aptamer Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102100021943 C-C motif chemokine 2 Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 101710155857 C-C motif chemokine 2 Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 108010055166 Chemokine CCL5 Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 108010012236 Chemokines Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102000019034 Chemokines Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108010017213 Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102100039620 Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 102000003814 Interleukin-10 Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108090000174 Interleukin-10 Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102000013691 Interleukin-17 Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108050003558 Interleukin-17 Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 108010002350 Interleukin-2 Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 108090000978 Interleukin-4 Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102000004388 Interleukin-4 Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108010002616 Interleukin-5 Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102000000743 Interleukin-5 Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108090001005 Interleukin-6 Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 108090001007 Interleukin-8 Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 101710151805 Mitochondrial intermediate peptidase 1 Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 206010033266 Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome Diseases 0.000 description 4
- -1 PDGF Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102100040247 Tumor necrosis factor Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 102000005789 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108010019530 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 239000011324 bead Substances 0.000 description 4
- 102000023732 binding proteins Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108091008324 binding proteins Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 230000003325 follicular Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000003102 growth factor Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000004005 microsphere Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000002823 phage display Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- MZOFCQQQCNRIBI-VMXHOPILSA-N (3s)-4-[[(2s)-1-[[(2s)-1-[[(1s)-1-carboxy-2-hydroxyethyl]amino]-4-methyl-1-oxopentan-2-yl]amino]-5-(diaminomethylideneamino)-1-oxopentan-2-yl]amino]-3-[[2-[[(2s)-2,6-diaminohexanoyl]amino]acetyl]amino]-4-oxobutanoic acid Chemical compound OC[C@@H](C(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CCCN=C(N)N)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(O)=O)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCCCN MZOFCQQQCNRIBI-VMXHOPILSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 201000000736 Amenorrhea Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 206010001928 Amenorrhoea Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 102100032367 C-C motif chemokine 5 Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108010054477 Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000001706 Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108010067060 Immunoglobulin Variable Region Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000017727 Immunoglobulin Variable Region Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 102000003812 Interleukin-15 Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108090000172 Interleukin-15 Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 108060008682 Tumor Necrosis Factor Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 231100000540 amenorrhea Toxicity 0.000 description 3
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000003149 assay kit Methods 0.000 description 3
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 239000000975 dye Substances 0.000 description 3
- 235000013601 eggs Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 108040001669 interleukin-1 receptor antagonist activity proteins Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000009634 interleukin-1 receptor antagonist activity proteins Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 108020004707 nucleic acids Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000039446 nucleic acids Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 150000007523 nucleic acids Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 3
- 150000003384 small molecules Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 239000007790 solid phase Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000002604 ultrasonography Methods 0.000 description 3
- 102100025248 C-X-C motif chemokine 10 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 101710098275 C-X-C motif chemokine 10 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102100023688 Eotaxin Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 101710139422 Eotaxin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101150021185 FGF gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101000959820 Homo sapiens Interferon alpha-1/13 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101000599048 Homo sapiens Interleukin-6 receptor subunit alpha Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102100037850 Interferon gamma Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010074328 Interferon-gamma Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000003777 Interleukin-1 beta Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108090000193 Interleukin-1 beta Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108010065805 Interleukin-12 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108090000176 Interleukin-13 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000004125 Interleukin-1alpha Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010082786 Interleukin-1alpha Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102100037792 Interleukin-6 receptor subunit alpha Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010002335 Interleukin-9 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 208000034702 Multiple pregnancies Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 108020004711 Nucleic Acid Probes Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108010003723 Single-Domain Antibodies Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 208000034790 Twin pregnancy Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000012491 analyte Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000009833 antibody interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 description 2
- 108091007433 antigens Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000036639 antigens Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 238000010256 biochemical assay Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009395 breeding Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012875 competitive assay Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002860 competitive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013467 fragmentation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000006062 fragmentation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002695 general anesthesia Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000004524 haematopoietic cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000009396 hybridization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013198 immunometric assay Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 2
- 208000000509 infertility Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 230000036512 infertility Effects 0.000 description 2
- 231100000535 infertility Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 208000021267 infertility disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002690 local anesthesia Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000491 multivariate analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002853 nucleic acid probe Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000016087 ovulation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004393 prognosis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000700 radioactive tracer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 108020003175 receptors Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000003381 stabilizer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000001356 surgical procedure Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007473 univariate analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241000283690 Bos taurus Species 0.000 description 1
- 102100034279 Calcium-binding mitochondrial carrier protein Aralar2 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102000001327 Chemokine CCL5 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108700022150 Designed Ankyrin Repeat Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000009007 Diagnostic Kit Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011510 Elispot assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 102100028967 HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, alpha chain G Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010024164 HLA-G Antigens Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000977636 Homo sapiens Isthmin-1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000611183 Homo sapiens Tumor necrosis factor Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010001336 Horseradish Peroxidase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000000589 Interleukin-1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010002352 Interleukin-1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010002586 Interleukin-7 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000000704 Interleukin-7 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102100023539 Isthmin-1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 208000007466 Male Infertility Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000283973 Oryctolagus cuniculus Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000007079 Peptide Fragments Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010033276 Peptide Fragments Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010036590 Premature baby Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001042 affinity chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000090 biomarker Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000001109 blastomere Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009534 blood test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108010084210 citrin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013211 curve analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000003785 decidua Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000001962 electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000005168 endometrial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002357 endometrial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003114 enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013401 experimental design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001605 fetal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003754 fetus Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011010 flushing procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000004186 follicle cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000008014 freezing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007710 freezing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000003958 hematopoietic stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002607 hemopoietic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004408 hybridoma Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000010191 image analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002163 immunogen Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003364 immunohistochemistry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000014674 injury Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007791 liquid phase Substances 0.000 description 1
- 244000144972 livestock Species 0.000 description 1
- 210000002596 lutein cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000008774 maternal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004379 membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010369 molecular cloning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037211 monthly cycles Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000877 morphologic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007837 multiplex assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003448 neutrophilic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002394 ovarian follicle Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000001672 ovary Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007170 pathology Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012071 phase Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000002826 placenta Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000010287 polarization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011176 pooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002203 pretreatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035755 proliferation Effects 0.000 description 1
- ZYHMJXZULPZUED-UHFFFAOYSA-N propargite Chemical compound C1=CC(C(C)(C)C)=CC=C1OC1C(OS(=O)OCC#C)CCCC1 ZYHMJXZULPZUED-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000004445 quantitative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012207 quantitative assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000009870 specific binding Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008733 trauma Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000472 traumatic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012800 visualization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001262 western blot Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/68—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving proteins, peptides or amino acids
- G01N33/689—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving proteins, peptides or amino acids related to pregnancy or the gonads
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
- C12Q1/6876—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
- C12Q1/6876—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes
- C12Q1/6883—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/68—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving proteins, peptides or amino acids
- G01N33/6863—Cytokines, i.e. immune system proteins modifying a biological response such as cell growth proliferation or differentiation, e.g. TNF, CNF, GM-CSF, lymphotoxin, MIF or their receptors
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
- C12Q2600/106—Pharmacogenomics, i.e. genetic variability in individual responses to drugs and drug metabolism
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
- C12Q2600/158—Expression markers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2333/00—Assays involving biological materials from specific organisms or of a specific nature
- G01N2333/435—Assays involving biological materials from specific organisms or of a specific nature from animals; from humans
- G01N2333/52—Assays involving cytokines
- G01N2333/53—Colony-stimulating factor [CSF]
- G01N2333/535—Granulocyte CSF; Granulocyte-macrophage CSF
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2800/00—Detection or diagnosis of diseases
- G01N2800/36—Gynecology or obstetrics
- G01N2800/367—Infertility, e.g. sperm disorder, ovulatory dysfunction
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2800/00—Detection or diagnosis of diseases
- G01N2800/52—Predicting or monitoring the response to treatment, e.g. for selection of therapy based on assay results in personalised medicine; Prognosis
Definitions
- IVF in vitro fertilization
- ICSI intracytoplasmic sperm injection
- assisted fertilisation is an expensive procedure and can also be psychologically traumatic for a patient.
- Surgical procedures are required to collect eggs for assisted fertilization and following fertilization, further surgery is required to implant fertilized eggs in the womb.
- the recipient must then wait for a period of time before it can be determined whether or not pregnancy has been established. In some cases, pregnancy may never be established despite repeated attempts and these cases represent a considerable expense to society, both in financial and human terms.
- an assay and kit which can indicate the potential for implantation of an oocyte before fertilization, enabling the chances of successful implant of the embryo to be maximized, and allowing indications of low success rates to be used to avoid the abovementioned trauma and costs of assisted fertilization.
- FIG. 1 ROC curve from a Luminex experiment to detect FF G-CSF using a Biorad Luminex kit.
- the true positive rate (Sensitivity) is plotted in function of the false positive rate (100-Specificity) for different cut-off points of FF G-CSF concentration.
- Each point on the ROC plot represents a sensitivity/specificity pair corresponding to a particular decision threshold.
- the area under the ROC curve is a measure of how well FF G-CSF can distinguish between two main diagnostic groups (certain implantation/no implantation).
- Line 1 The Area under curve is 0.82, indicating that a randomly selected individual from the positive group has a test value larger than that for a randomly chosen individual from the negative group in 82% of the time.
- Line 2 Area under the ROC curve is 0.5 representing the null hypothesis.
- FIG. 2 ROC curve from a Luminex experiment to detect FF G-CSF using an R and D Luminex kit.
- Line 1 The Area under curve is 0.72, indicating that a randomly selected individual from the positive group has a test value larger than that for a randomly chosen individual from the negative group in 72% of the time.
- Line 2 Area under the ROC curve is 0.5 representing the null hypothesis.
- FIG. 3 Graph showing the variation in concentration of individual follicular fluid of a same cohort of embryos obtained from multiple subjects. Each box shows the variation of individual follicular fluids from the mean in a same cohort of embryos generated.
- Embodiments of the invention are based on an unexpected finding by the inventors that a female subject providing a plurality of oocytes under ovarian hyperstimulation will exhibit a variation in the levels of several cytokines and growth factors present in the follicular fluid of the follicle from which each oocyte is derived. Furthermore, the inventors found there is a strong correlation between a high level of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) present in the follicular fluid of the individual follicle from which an oocyte is derived and a high implantation potential of an embryo obtained by fertilization of said oocyte.
- G-CSF granulocyte-colony stimulating factor
- the follicular fluid surrounding each individual oocyte may vary in composition, and that said composition is indicative of the success of implantation of the subsequently fertilized oocyte.
- This finding allows a plurality of embryos obtained from a single patient to be ranked in order of implantation potential.
- patients showing a borderline fertility potential using indicators that average oocyte fertility markers e.g. 11-beta HSD
- the method offers the possibility to rate each oocyte individually and thus embryo individually, without interference to the embryo or oocyte.
- Embodiments of the present invention relate to an assay for determining the implantation potential of a plurality of embryos each obtained or to be obtained by assisted fertilisation of an oocyte of a female subject, comprising measuring the levels of G-CSF in the follicular fluid present in the follicle from which each oocyte is derived, and determining the implantation potential of each embryo from the level of follicular fluid G-CSF.
- the oocyte from the follicle with the highest level of G-CSF in follicular fluid gives rise to an embryo with the greatest implantation potential.
- Embodiments of the present invention relates to an assay kit which can be used to predict the outcome of assisted fertilization in a female patient.
- the invention also relates to such assay and kit for use in a method of fertilization treatment, to improve implantation.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein oocytes having the highest levels of FF G-CSF have the highest potential of implantation.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein each sample of FF is obtained from a follicular aspirate.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein respective levels of FF G-CSF are measured within 20 hours of collection of the follicular aspirate.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein a level of FF G-CSF equal to or less than 20.6 pg/ml determines no or a low potential of implantation.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein a level of FF G-CSF equal to or greater than 24.0 pg/ml determines a high potential of implantation.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein the respective levels of FF G-CSF are measured using an immunoassay.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein the respective levels of FF G-CSF are measured using an a competitive or immunometric assay, such as RIA, IRMA, ELISA, or ELISPOT assay.
- a competitive or immunometric assay such as RIA, IRMA, ELISA, or ELISPOT assay.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein the respective levels of FF G-CSF are measured using a Luminex assay.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein the Luminex assay employs a Biorad or R and D Luminex Kit.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein the respective levels of FF G-CSF are measured by determining the levels of FF G-CSF mRNA.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein the respective levels of FF G-CSF are measured by any of surface Plasmon resonance, fluorescence resonance energy transfer, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, fluorescence quenching fluorescence, fluorescence polarization, MS, HPLC, HPLC/SM, HPLC/MS/MS, capillary electrophoresis, rod or slab gel electrophoresis.
- kits for use in performing the assay as described above comprising at least one reagent suitable for detection of levels of FF G-CSF or FF G-CSF mRNA.
- Another embodiment of the invention is a kit as described above, further comprising a set of concentration standards of FF G-CSF.
- kits as described above, further comprising a plurality of aspirator tips for removing an oocyte and follicular fluid from a subject.
- kits for determining for a female subject the implantation potential of embryos obtained or to be obtained by assisted fertilization comprising at least one reagent suitable for detection of levels of FF G-CSF or FF G-CSF mRNA.
- the kit may further comprise a set of concentration standards of G-CSF.
- the concentration standards may be commercial G-CSF standards.
- the kit may further comprise a plurality of aspirator tips for removing an oocyte and follicular fluid from a subject.
- At least one reagent may comprise an anti-G-CSF antibody for detection of levels of FF G-CSF; the anti-G-CSF antibody may be labeled.
- At least one reagent may comprise a nucleic acid probe for detection of levels of G-CSF mRNA; the nucleic acid probe may be labeled.
- the at least one reagent may comprise a specific antibody fragment, nanobody, affibody, an aptamer, a photoaptamer, a small molecule, an interacting partner, a specifically binding protein or peptide, a Darpin, or an ankyrin, an isotopically labeled tracer, or a ligand, specifically binding to said G-CSF.
- the specific antibody fragment may be a Fab fragment, an Fv fragment, or a scFv fragment.
- the at least one reagent may comprise a specific labeled antibody fragment, a labeled nanobody, a labeled affibody, a labeled aptamer, a labeled photoaptamer, a labeled small molecule, a labeled interacting partner, a labeled specifically binding protein or peptide, a labeled Darpin, a labeled ankyrin, or a labeled ligand, specifically binding to said G-CSF.
- the specific labeled antibody fragment may be a labeled Fab fragment, a labeled Fv fragment, or a labeled scFv fragment.
- a sample means one sample or more than one sample.
- endpoints includes all integer numbers and, where appropriate, fractions subsumed within that range (e.g. 1 to 5 can include 1, 2, 3, 4 when referring to, for example, a number of samples, and can also include 1.5, 2, 2.75 and 3.80, when referring to, for example, concentrations).
- the recitation of end points also includes the end point values themselves (e.g. from 1.0 to 5.0 includes both 1.0 and 5.0)
- a female subject providing a plurality of oocytes under ovarian hyperstimulation will exhibit a variation in the levels of several cytokines and growth factors present in the follicular fluid of the follicle from which each oocyte is derived. Furthermore, the inventors found there is a strong correlation between a high level of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) present in the follicular fluid of the individual follicle from which an oocyte is derived and a high implantation potential of an embryo obtained by fertilization of said oocyte.
- G-CSF granulocyte-colony stimulating factor
- the follicular fluid surrounding each individual oocyte may vary in composition, and that said composition is indicative of the success of implantation of the subsequently fertilized oocyte.
- This finding allows a plurality of embryos obtained from a single patient to be ranked in order of implantation potential.
- patients showing a borderline fertility potential using indicators that average oocyte fertility markers e.g. 11-beta HSD
- the method offers the possibility to rate each oocyte individually and thus embryo individually, without interference to the embryo or oocyte.
- Embodiments of the present invention thus relate to an assay method and assay kit which can be used to predict the outcome of assisted fertilization in a female patient.
- Embodiments of the invention also relate to such assay and kit for use in a method of fertilization treatment, to improve implantation.
- our invention described below has been developed from research on human female patients, it will be applicable to any mammalian female and can be used to increase the success of, for example, captive breeding programs of endangered species or commercial breeding by assisted fertilization of livestock such as cattle or horses.
- the subject has undergone fertility pretreatment (e.g. ovarian hyperstimulation) to increase the number of eggs produced per monthly cycle.
- Assisted fertilization refers to ex vivo fertilization methods where the oocyte is fertilized outside the female body, such as in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
- One embodiment of the invention is an assay for determining the implantation potential of a plurality of embryos each obtained or to be obtained by assisted fertilisation of an oocyte of a female subject, comprising measuring the levels of G-CSF in the follicular fluid present in the follicle from which each oocyte is derived, and determining the implantation potential of each embryo from the level of follicular fluid G-CSF.
- the oocyte from the follicle with the highest level of G-CSF in follicular fluid gives rise to an embryo with the greatest implantation potential.
- G-CSF Granulocyte colony stimulating factor
- G-CSF is also produce by non-hemopoietic cells, such as in the reproduction tract: the human luteinized follicular granulosa cells (Salmassi A, et al, 2004 , Fertil Steril, 81 Suppl 1:786), endometrial cells (Giacomini G, et al., 1995, Hum Reprod 10(12):3259), decidua and placenta (Duan J. S., 1990 , Osaka City Med J 36(2):81; Miyama M et al., 1998 , Osaka City Med J., 44(1):85) and various fetal tissue (Calhoun et al., 1999 .
- G-CSF protein and its receptor were located (western blot and immunohistochemistry) mainly in granulosa cells of the follicle and luteal cells (Salmassi, et al., 2004).
- the level of follicular fluid G-CSF is preferably measured within the day of oocyte collection.
- follicular aspiration is guided using transvaginal sonography after local or general anesthesia.
- Each follicular fluid corresponding to one ovarian follicle visualized through vaginal sonography is aspirated individually.
- the capture of each oocyte does not require any other manipulation because the follicular fluid, which surrounds the oocyte, is aspirated along with the oocyte. Inspection of the follicular fluid under microscope allows immediate identification of the presence of the oocyte.
- the oocyte is separated at the time of collection so the levels of FF G-CSF can be individually measured.
- the level of FF G-CSF is measured with 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 hours of oocyte collection, of within a time between any two of the aforementioned values.
- the level of FF G-CSF is measured within 1 to 20 hours of oocyte collection.
- the level of FF G-CSF associated with an oocyte can be measured using any suitable quantitative assay.
- the measuring may be performed, for example, using a method selected from biochemical assay (e.g., solid or liquid phase immunoassay), surface plasmon resonance, fluorescence resonance energy transfer, fluorescence quenching, and fluorescence polarization.
- biochemical assay e.g., solid or liquid phase immunoassay
- surface plasmon resonance e.g., fluorescence resonance energy transfer, fluorescence quenching, and fluorescence polarization.
- Biochemical assays generally rely on the immobilization of an analyte component, for example, to a membrane or other solid support, and exposure to a ligand. After washing away excess ligand, bound ligand is detected by immunoassay, or by using labeled ligand (e.g., radio-labeled ligand, fluorescently labeled ligand, particulate labeled ligand etc.).
- labeled ligand e.g., radio-labeled ligand, fluorescently labeled ligand, particulate labeled ligand etc.
- antibodies against G-CSF may be immobilized onto magnetic beads and exposed to a sample of follicular fluid. Bound G-CSF can be detected using primary and secondary antibody immunoassays to arrive at a concentration. Typically, an immunoassay is calibrated used a set of standards. Solid phase immunoassays are described for example in U.S. Pat. No. 4,376,110.
- immunoassays within the scope of the invention include any competitive or immunometric assay format using anti-G-CSF antibodies, for instance RIA (radio-immunoassay), ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), ELISPOT (enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot) or Luminex (bead-based multiplex sandwich immunoassay).
- RIA radio-immunoassay
- ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
- ELISPOT enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot
- Luminex bead-based multiplex sandwich immunoassay
- the levels FF G-CSF are preferably measured by using Luminex technology.
- Luminex is a highly sensitive method for measuring simultaneously the levels of specific components in a system. It makes use of solid phase, colour (dye) coded microspheres that are small enough to behave almost as a solution in a liquid. Each microsphere is coated with an antibody, or other ligand-binding reagent specific for the detected components (e.g. FF G-CSF). The components of the sample are captured and detected on the microspheres. Within an analyzer, lasers excite the internal dyes that identify each microsphere particle, and also any reporter dye captured during the assay. Many readings are made on each bead set, to validate the results.
- the levels of FF G-CSF are measured using a kit(s) manufactured by Biorad® or R and D®.
- the Biorad® kit is the Human Cytokine Fluorescent Bead Immunoassay Assay Kit, Bio-PlexTM (Hercules, Calif., USA, 17A11127).
- the R and D kit is the LUH000, LUH279, LUH270, LUH271, LUH278, LUH208, LUH214, LUH215B, LUH285, LUH200, LUH280, LUH201, LUH202, LUH204, LUH205, LUH206, LUH217, LUH317, LUH210, LUH293, LUB000, LUB320, LUB294, LUB219, and/or LUB213 kit.
- the term “antibody”, unless specified to the contrary, includes monoclonal antibodies, polyclonal antibodies, and fragments of whole antibodies which retain their binding activity for a target antigen. Such fragments include Fv, F(ab′) and F(ab′)2 fragments, as well as single chain antibodies. Furthermore, the antibodies and fragments thereof may be humanized antibodies, e.g. as described in EP-A-239400 (Winter).
- Antibodies against FF G-CSF may be monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies.
- Monoclonal antibodies may be prepared by conventional hybridoma technology using the proteins or peptide fragments thereof, as an immunogen.
- Polyclonal antibodies may also be prepared by conventional means which comprise inoculating a host animal, for example a rat or a rabbit, with a peptide of the invention and recovering immune serum.
- levels of FF G-CSF may be estimated by analyzing the levels of FF G-CSF mRNA in the granulosa cells.
- Granulosa cells around the corona radiata may be stored at the stage of the decoronisation of each oocytes and be stored in RNA stabiliser (e.g. at 80° C.) until assay.
- Probes for the FF G-CSF gene may be designed for use as probes, for example for use in a nucleic acid (PCR) amplification assay and/or hybridization.
- a surface plasmon resonance assay may, alternatively, be used as a quantitative method to measure the level of G-CSF in a follicular fluid sample.
- a chip-bound anti-G-CSF antibody is challenged with a follicular fluid and the surface plasmon resonance measured. Binding reactions are performed using standard concentrations to arrive at the levels of G-CSF of G-CSF in the follicular fluid.
- FRET fluorescence resonance energy transfer
- the G-CSF and anti-G-CSF antibody are labeled with a complementary pair of donor and acceptor fluorophores. While bound closely together by the G-CSF: anti-G-CSF antibody interaction, the fluorescence emitted upon excitation of the donor fluorophore will have a different wavelength than that emitted in response to that excitation wavelength when the G-CSF and anti-G-CSF antibody are not bound, providing for quantitation of bound versus unbound molecules by measurement of emission intensity at each wavelength. Binding reactions can be compared with a set of standards to arrive at the level of G-CSF in the follicular fluid.
- BRET biologicalluminescence resonance energy transfer
- Light is emitted by an acceptor when in close proximity to the donor, i.e., when a G-CSF: anti-G-CSF antibody interaction complex is formed.
- the level of G-CSF in the follicular fluid is determined.
- Fluorescence quenching fluorescence similarly provides a measurement of G-CSF levels.
- a decrease in fluorescence of the labeled anti-G-CSF antibody is indicative that the G-CSF bearing the quencher has bound.
- a similar effect would arise when a G-CSF is fluorescently labeled and anti-G-CSF antibody bears the quencher.
- Fluorescence polarization measurement can also determine the level of G-CSF in a follicular fluid sample. Complexes, such as those formed by G-CSF associating with a fluorescently anti-G-CSF antibody, would have higher polarization values than uncomplexed, labelled anti-G-CSF antibody. This form the basis for determining the levels of G-CSF in a follicular fluid sample, which measurements are typically performed concurrent with a set of standard G-CSF concentrations.
- MS mass spectrometry
- HPLC high performance liquid chromatography
- HPLC/MS HPLC/MS
- capillary electrophoresis capillary electrophoresis and rod or slab gel electrophoresis associated with image analysis.
- Such techniques are well known in the art as described, for example, in Modern HPLC for Practicing Engineers (Dong, M, Wiley-Interscience, June 2006), Tandem Mass Spectrometry (McLafferty F. W.
- the results may be used to establish the relative implantation potential of embryos obtained by fertilization of said oocytes i.e. a ranking order.
- the level of FF G-CSF may be used to determine whether all, some or none of the oocytes will after fertilization establish implantation in a female subject undergoing assisted fertilization treatment.
- the level of FF G-CSF may be used to determine whether all, some or none of the embryos will implant in a female subject undergoing assisted fertilization treatment.
- the level of FF G-CSF mentioned above represents the measure we have used in our studies as a suitable limit.
- levels of FF G-CSF were to be measured in any of the other ways mentioned above, it would be desirable to conduct, using routine procedures, a control using our method of assay in order to determine the relationship between our results and the results of other methods, in order to make direct comparisons.
- an embryo derived from an oocyte where a level of FF G-CSF in its follicle is equal to or less than 21.6 pg/ml, 21.4 pg/ml, 21.2 pg/ml, 21.0 pg/ml, 20.8 pg/ml, 20.6 pg/ml, 20.4 pg/ml, 20.2 pg/ml, 20.0 pg/ml, 19.8 pg/ml, 19.6 pg/ml, 19.4 pg/ml, 19.2 pg/ml, 19.0 pg/ml, 18.8 pg/ml, 18.6 pg/ml, 18.4 pg/ml, 18.2 pg/ml, 18.0 pg/ml 17.8 pg/ml, 17.6 pg/ml, 17.4 pg/ml, 17.2 pg/ml, 17.0 pg/ml,
- a level of FF G-CSF equal to or less than 15.0 pg/ml to 20.0 pg/ml, more preferably equal to or less than 19.8 to 20.6 pg/ml, most preferably less than 20.6 pg/ml is predicted to have no or a low implantation potential.
- the levels of this embodiment are considered threshold levels for a method of assisted fertilization (below).
- a low level of implantation is a probability of implantation of 10%, 9%, 8% or less.
- an embryo derived from an oocyte where a level of FF G-CSF in its follicle is equal to or less than 34.0 pg/ml, 33.5 pg/ml, 33.0 pg/ml, 32.5 pg/ml, 32.0 pg/ml, 31.5 pg/ml, 31.0 pg/ml, 30.5 pg/ml, 30.0 pg/ml, 29.5 pg/ml, 29.0 pg/ml, 28.5 pg/ml, 28.0 pg/ml, 27.5 pg/ml, 27.0 pg/ml, 26.5 pg/ml, 26.0 pg/ml, 25.5 pg/ml, 25.0 pg/ml, 24.5 pg/ml, 24.0 pg/ml, 23.5 pg/ml, 23.0 pg/ml, 22.5 pg
- a likely potential of implantation means a probability of implantation of 15% to 25%.
- the levels of this embodiment are considered threshold levels for a method of assisted fertilization (below).
- an embryo derived from an oocyte where a level of FF G-CSF in its follicle is equal to or higher than 22.0 pg/ml, 22.1 pg/ml, 22.2 pg/ml, 22.3 pg/ml, 22.4 pg/ml, 22.5 pg/ml, 22.6 pg/ml, 22.7 pg/ml, 22.8 pg/ml, 22.9 pg/ml, 23.0 pg/ml, 23.1 pg/ml, 23.2 pg/ml, 23.3 pg/ml, 23.4 pg/ml, 23.5 pg/ml, 23.6 pg/ml, 23.7 pg/ml, 23.8 pg/ml, 23.9 pg/ml, 24.0 pg/ml, 24.1 pg/ml, 24.2 pg/ml, 24.3 pg/ml,
- a level of FF-CSF equal to or higher than 24.0 pg/ml, more preferably higher than 35 pg/ml is predicted to have a high implantation potential.
- the levels of this embodiment are considered threshold levels for a method of assisted fertilization (below).
- a high level of implantation is a probability of implantation of 30%, 35%, 40%, 43%, 44% or more.
- all the oocytes may be fertilized, and only those embryos derived from oocytes indicating a high or complete certainty of implantation, are implanted; this allows a higher chance of success as the indication of implantation does not necessarily correlated with chances of fertilization.
- the present invention significantly increase the implantation rate while decreasing the number of embryos replaced. It also allows a specialist to become more efficient in preventing multiple pregnancies and all the related fetal and maternal morbidity.
- the oocyte and thus the embryo with the highest potential can be implanted implant, therefore, allows a policy of single embryo transfer while not decreasing the overall pregnancy rate.
- the assay described herein may also be employed in a method of assisting the fertilization of a female subject.
- One embodiment of the invention is a method for assisted fertilization of a female subject comprising:
- the number of oocytes subjected to further fertilization may be 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 or more. Alternatively, 50%, 40%, 30%, 20%, or 10% of the oocytes are fertilized, which percentage have the highest levels of FF G-CSF.
- the number of embryos implanted may be 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 or more. Alternatively, 50%, 40%, 30%, 20%, or 10% of the embryos are implanted, which percentage have the highest levels of FF G-CSF.
- the number of embryos implanted may be 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 or more. Alternatively, 50%, 40%, 30%, 20%, or 10% of the embryos are implanted, which percentage have the highest levels of FF G-CSF.
- Kits for use in performing the assay of the invention may be provided. Such kits include at least one reagent useful for the detection of FF G-CSF.
- Suitable reagents include one or more of a specific antibody fragment, nanobody, affibody, an aptamer, a photoaptamer, a small molecule, an interacting partner, a specifically binding protein or peptide, a Darpin, or an ankyrin, an isotopically labeled tracer, or a ligand, specifically binding to said G-CSF, optionally be linked to a label.
- the specific antibody fragment is a Fab fragment, an Fv fragment, or a scFv fragment.
- a nanobody is a single-domain antibody having a single monomeric variable antibody domain able to bind selectively to a specific antigen.
- a specifically binding nanobody may be prepared from a library of engineered nanobodies having a different binding regions, screened against a target. Phage display technology may be employed to select binding recombinant strains. Suitable construction and screening techniques are mentioned in WO 94/04678.
- An affibody is an engineered binding molecule having high stability and specificity, containing three alpha helices as a protein scaffold.
- a specifically binding affibody may be prepared from a library of engineered affibody having a different binding region, screened against a target. Phage display technology may be employed to select binding recombinant strains.
- a Darpin (designed ankyrin repeat proteins) is an engineered specific binding protein containing a number of repeats (e.g. 2, 3, 4, 5 6 or more) of an ankyrin subunit.
- a specifically binding Darpin may be prepared from a library of engineered Darpins having a different binding region, screened against a target.
- Phage display technology may be employed to select binding recombinant strains. Suitable construction and screening techniques are mentioned in WO 02/20565 and WO 2010/060748. Aptamers are engineered oligonucleic acid or peptide molecules typically having a scaffold and variable binding domain, that binds to a specific target molecule; as with others they may be screened against a target using phage display technology.
- Suitable reagents include antibodies, or other suitable ligand-binding reagents, against FF G-CSF optionally linked to a label.
- Typical labels are those commonly used in immunoassay procedures, for example horse radish peroxidase.
- the kit may also contain standards, for examples predetermined amounts of FF G-CSF (e.g. protein or RNA) may be labeled with a detectable label.
- the kit may also contain disposable aspirator tips for use in extracting the oocytes and follicular fluid.
- the kit may be used for the measurement of FF G-CSF for use in a method of diagnosis, prognosis, and/or assisted fertilization treatment of a female subject.
- the invention further provides the use of a reagent for the detection of FF G-CSF for the prognosis of the likelihood of establishing pregnancy by assisted fertilization in a female subject.
- the abovementioned antibodies, fragments and variants thereof, and other suitable ligand-binding reagents, which may optionally be labeled with a detectable label, may be used for the manufacture of a diagnostic kit for use in the treatment or diagnosis of suitability for assisted fertilization.
- Levels of FF G-CSF may also be assayed via analysis of the levels of FF G-CSF mRNA present in samples obtained.
- FF G-CSF or fragments thereof may be used as a probe to determine levels of G-CSF in the follicular fluid.
- levels of FF G-CSF may be estimated by analyzing the levels of FF G-CSF mRNA expressed in the follicular fluid or in the granulosa cells.
- Granulosa cells around the corona radiate may be stored at the stage of the decoronisation of each oocytes and stored in RNA stabiliser (e.g. at 80° C.) until assay.
- probes may also be formulated into kits in a manner analogous to those described for antibodies, and may contain control nucleic acids.
- Probes for the FF G-CSF gene may be designed for use as probes, for example for use in a nucleic acid amplification assay.
- ovarian hyperstimulation Patients underwent the classical procedure of ovarian hyperstimulation. We applied the protocol referred by their physician. Response to stimulation was controlled by serial blood tests and ultrasonic evaluation to control follicles and endometrial growth. Criteria for triggering the ovulation was obtained when at least 5 follicles reached 16 mm. The oocytes retrieval took place 35 to 36 hours after the triggering of ovulation. The oocyte aspiration was performed under general or local anesthesia with vaginal ultrasonography using individual 10 ml syringe for each follicle in the studied group. We thus adaptated the classical method of oocyte aspiration in order to individualize the follicular fluid of each oocyte collected.
- each follicle was immediately assessed and the follicles devoid of an oocyte were discarded.
- individual follicular fluid sample each corresponding to one mature oocyte was collected.
- the volume and the aspect (citrin, orange or hematic) of each follicular fluid sample were recorded.
- Individual follicular fluid samples were centrifuged and the supernatant aliquoted after proceeding to the anonymisation of each sample according to a database in order to blind subsequent analysis. Samples were initially stored at ⁇ 20° C., then at ⁇ 80° C. until assay. All the clinical and biological information were recorded in real-time on the database (Medifirst).
- Oocytes were collected and cumuls and corona cells removed with hyluronidase 80 IU (Fertipro). Oocyte were injected in a 5 ⁇ l drop of flushing medium (JCD), with a sperm sample slowed by PVP medium (fertopto). Injected oocytes were cultured in singly 40 ⁇ l microdroplet of ISM1 (Medicult, france) under oil at 37° C. Pronuclei number and aspect were assesses after 20 hours according to Gianaroli criteria. On day 2, the number, fragmentation and regularity of each blastomere were recorded. Embryo transfer was scheduled on day 2.
- ISM1 Medicult, france
- Each sample was related to a probability of implantation, described here as the implantation rate.
- the clinical Implantation rate of an embryo is defined for each tested sample as the number of yolk sac/number of embryos transferred.
- Clinical implantation was defined at 8 weeks of amenorrhea by the ultrasonic visualization of a yolk sac.
- each sample is characterized by a probability of 50% of implantation.
- 132 follicular fluid samples corresponding to the subsequent 132 transferred embryos were analyzed for levels of certain cytokines and chemokines.
- concentrations of IL-1beta, IL-1Ra, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-15, IL-17, IFN alpha, TNF-alpha, G-CSF, GM-CSF, VEGF, PDGF, FGF, IP-10, MCP-1, RANTES, EOTAXIN, MIP-1 alpha, MIP-1 beta were evaluated using Luminex technology, utilizing a a Biorad® Luminex® Kit.
- G-CSF was not related to the embryo morphology if compared in regard the two categories best embryo quality versus others. Therefore, there was no correlation between G-CSF and embryo morphological quality (High quality versus other quality transferred embryos)
- G-CSF Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating factor
- Embryos were Classified According to their Implantation Rates.
- the lower threshold was defined by the stronger negative predictive value of implantation. If G-CSF is lower than 20 pg/ml, negative predictive value is at 100% from AUC-ROC. If G-CSF is over 24, positive predictive value reaches its maximum: 40%
- follicular fluid samples corresponding to the subsequent 200 transferred embryos were analyzed.
- concentrations of the following cytokines and chemokines IL-1 alpha, IL-1beta, IL-1Ra, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, IFN alpha, TNF-alpha, G-CSF, GM-CSF, MIP-1 alpha, MIP-1 beta, RANTES, MCP-1, VEGF, were evaluated using Luminex technology utilizing the kit made by R&D.
- G-CSF, IL-1 Ra; IL-6, IL-8, MIP-beta, RANTES, MCP-1, VEGF were detected in 95 to 100% of the follicular fluid samples tested:
- G-CSF was detected in all fluids and with low standard variations from a sample to another which is a strong requirement to identify a biomarker.
- AUC-ROC curve we defined a lower threshold and upper threshold for G-CSF to evaluate if G-CSF concentration may be used to predict for each embryo a “potential of implantation” that would help in the decision of the number of embryos we should replace.
- the lower threshold was defined by the stronger negative predictive value of implantation. If G-CSF is lower than 15 pg/ml, negative predictive value was 100% from AUC-ROC. If G-CSF was over 34, positive predictive value reaches it maximum of 27.8%.
- FIG. 3 is graph showing the variation in concentration of individual follicular fluid of a same cohort of embryos obtained from 10 multiple subjects. Each box shows the variation of individual follicular fluids from the mean in a same cohort of embryos generated. These observation suggests that all the embryos generated are not equal in regard of FF-GCSF and hence in their potential of implantation.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Hematology (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Cell Biology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Food Science & Technology (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Reproductive Health (AREA)
- Pregnancy & Childbirth (AREA)
- Gynecology & Obstetrics (AREA)
- Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
Abstract
A method of obtaining a class of embryos having a higher implantation potential than from morphology selection alone by selecting from multiple embryos, obtained by fertilizing the plurality of oocytes, a class of embryos having a high implantation potential. The selection is determined from a level of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) present in the follicular fluid (FF) of each oocyte in the multiple oocytes.
Description
- This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/597,617, filed May 17, 2017, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/927,264, filed Oct. 29, 2015 which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/539,660, filed Jul. 2, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,176,145 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/374,472, filed Jan. 20, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,211,650 which is incorporated herein by reference and which is the U.S. National Phase under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application PCT/EP2007/057430, filed Jul. 18, 2007, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/832,094, filed Jul. 21, 2006.
- Assisted fertilization, such as in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has been used in human patients with infertility problems successfully for three decades. Despite extensive research it is still a difficult and expensive procedure and a low implantation rate per transferred embryos (15-20%) is generally observed.
- Hospitals and private centers providing an assisted fertilization service, base their selection after fertilization of the oocyte on characteristics of the embryo so produced. For example, selection may be based on the morphology of the embryo (Guerif F et al., 2007, Hum Reprod 22(7): 1973), or on the production of soluble HLA-G by the embryos (Fuzzi B, et al., 2002, Eur J Immunol. February; 32(2):311-5.). Both these techniques require interference with the embryo.
- To increase the pregnancy success, the number of embryos transferred typically more than one. In Europe, it is normal practice to transfer two embryos to the uterine cavity. In the US, it is more, usually three or four embryos are transferred. The adverse effect of such a policy is to increase the number of multiple pregnancies and the subsequent related obstetrical pathologies, such as prematurity and low birth rate mainly.
- Furthermore, assisted fertilisation is an expensive procedure and can also be psychologically traumatic for a patient. Surgical procedures are required to collect eggs for assisted fertilization and following fertilization, further surgery is required to implant fertilized eggs in the womb. The recipient must then wait for a period of time before it can be determined whether or not pregnancy has been established. In some cases, pregnancy may never be established despite repeated attempts and these cases represent a considerable expense to society, both in financial and human terms.
- Therefore, it would be desirable to provide an assay and kit which can indicate the potential for implantation of an oocyte before fertilization, enabling the chances of successful implant of the embryo to be maximized, and allowing indications of low success rates to be used to avoid the abovementioned trauma and costs of assisted fertilization.
-
FIG. 1 . ROC curve from a Luminex experiment to detect FF G-CSF using a Biorad Luminex kit. The true positive rate (Sensitivity) is plotted in function of the false positive rate (100-Specificity) for different cut-off points of FF G-CSF concentration. Each point on the ROC plot represents a sensitivity/specificity pair corresponding to a particular decision threshold. The area under the ROC curve is a measure of how well FF G-CSF can distinguish between two main diagnostic groups (certain implantation/no implantation). Line 1: The Area under curve is 0.82, indicating that a randomly selected individual from the positive group has a test value larger than that for a randomly chosen individual from the negative group in 82% of the time. Line 2: Area under the ROC curve is 0.5 representing the null hypothesis. -
FIG. 2 . ROC curve from a Luminex experiment to detect FF G-CSF using an R and D Luminex kit. Line 1: The Area under curve is 0.72, indicating that a randomly selected individual from the positive group has a test value larger than that for a randomly chosen individual from the negative group in 72% of the time. Line 2: Area under the ROC curve is 0.5 representing the null hypothesis. -
FIG. 3 . Graph showing the variation in concentration of individual follicular fluid of a same cohort of embryos obtained from multiple subjects. Each box shows the variation of individual follicular fluids from the mean in a same cohort of embryos generated. - Embodiments of the invention are based on an unexpected finding by the inventors that a female subject providing a plurality of oocytes under ovarian hyperstimulation will exhibit a variation in the levels of several cytokines and growth factors present in the follicular fluid of the follicle from which each oocyte is derived. Furthermore, the inventors found there is a strong correlation between a high level of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) present in the follicular fluid of the individual follicle from which an oocyte is derived and a high implantation potential of an embryo obtained by fertilization of said oocyte. It has never been demonstrated before that, for the same subject, the follicular fluid surrounding each individual oocyte may vary in composition, and that said composition is indicative of the success of implantation of the subsequently fertilized oocyte. This finding allows a plurality of embryos obtained from a single patient to be ranked in order of implantation potential. For the first time, patients showing a borderline fertility potential using indicators that average oocyte fertility markers (e.g. 11-beta HSD) may be found to have oocytes showing a high implantation potential against a poor overall average; this offer new possibilities for previously infertile-indicating females. Furthermore, the method offers the possibility to rate each oocyte individually and thus embryo individually, without interference to the embryo or oocyte.
- Embodiments of the present invention relate to an assay for determining the implantation potential of a plurality of embryos each obtained or to be obtained by assisted fertilisation of an oocyte of a female subject, comprising measuring the levels of G-CSF in the follicular fluid present in the follicle from which each oocyte is derived, and determining the implantation potential of each embryo from the level of follicular fluid G-CSF. The oocyte from the follicle with the highest level of G-CSF in follicular fluid gives rise to an embryo with the greatest implantation potential.
- Embodiments of the present invention relates to an assay kit which can be used to predict the outcome of assisted fertilization in a female patient. The invention also relates to such assay and kit for use in a method of fertilization treatment, to improve implantation.
- One embodiment of the invention is an assay for determining for a female subject the implantation potential of embryos obtained or to be obtained by assisted fertilization comprising:
- (i) measuring, for a plurality of oocytes collected from said subject, the level of follicular fluid granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) present in the follicular fluid (FF) of a follicle of each collected oocyte; and
- (ii) determining from the levels of FF G-CSF measured, the implantation potentials of the embryos obtained or to be obtained by assisted fertilization of the oocytes.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein oocytes having the highest levels of FF G-CSF have the highest potential of implantation.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein each sample of FF is obtained from a follicular aspirate.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein respective levels of FF G-CSF are measured within 20 hours of collection of the follicular aspirate.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein a level of FF G-CSF equal to or less than 20.6 pg/ml determines no or a low potential of implantation.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein a level of FF G-CSF equal to or greater than 24.0 pg/ml determines a high potential of implantation.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein the respective levels of FF G-CSF are measured using an immunoassay.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein the respective levels of FF G-CSF are measured using an a competitive or immunometric assay, such as RIA, IRMA, ELISA, or ELISPOT assay.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein the respective levels of FF G-CSF are measured using a Luminex assay.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein the Luminex assay employs a Biorad or R and D Luminex Kit.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein the respective levels of FF G-CSF are measured by determining the levels of FF G-CSF mRNA.
- Another embodiment of the invention is an assay as described above, wherein the respective levels of FF G-CSF are measured by any of surface Plasmon resonance, fluorescence resonance energy transfer, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, fluorescence quenching fluorescence, fluorescence polarization, MS, HPLC, HPLC/SM, HPLC/MS/MS, capillary electrophoresis, rod or slab gel electrophoresis.
- Another embodiment of the invention is a kit for use in performing the assay as described above, comprising at least one reagent suitable for detection of levels of FF G-CSF or FF G-CSF mRNA.
- Another embodiment of the invention is a kit as described above, further comprising a set of concentration standards of FF G-CSF.
- Another embodiment of the invention is a kit as described above, further comprising a plurality of aspirator tips for removing an oocyte and follicular fluid from a subject.
- Another embodiment of the invention is a method for assisted fertilization of a female subject comprising:
- (i) collecting a plurality of oocytes from said subject,
- (ii) determining the implantation potential for an embryo derived from each oocyte according to the assay as described above,
- (iii) fertilizing the oocytes corresponding to embryos having a high potential for implantation, and
- (iv) implanting the embryo so obtained into the female subject.
- Another embodiment of the invention is a method for assisted fertilization of a female subject comprising:
- (i) collecting a plurality of oocytes from said subject,
- (ii) determining the implantation potential for an embryo derived from each oocyte according to the assay as described above,
- (iii) fertilizing the oocytes to obtain embryos, and
- (iv) implanting the embryos having a high implantation potential.
- Another embodiment of the invention is a kit for determining for a female subject the implantation potential of embryos obtained or to be obtained by assisted fertilization comprising at least one reagent suitable for detection of levels of FF G-CSF or FF G-CSF mRNA. The kit may further comprise a set of concentration standards of G-CSF. The concentration standards may be commercial G-CSF standards. The kit may further comprise a plurality of aspirator tips for removing an oocyte and follicular fluid from a subject. At least one reagent may comprise an anti-G-CSF antibody for detection of levels of FF G-CSF; the anti-G-CSF antibody may be labeled. At least one reagent may comprise a nucleic acid probe for detection of levels of G-CSF mRNA; the nucleic acid probe may be labeled. The at least one reagent may comprise a specific antibody fragment, nanobody, affibody, an aptamer, a photoaptamer, a small molecule, an interacting partner, a specifically binding protein or peptide, a Darpin, or an ankyrin, an isotopically labeled tracer, or a ligand, specifically binding to said G-CSF. The specific antibody fragment may be a Fab fragment, an Fv fragment, or a scFv fragment. The at least one reagent may comprise a specific labeled antibody fragment, a labeled nanobody, a labeled affibody, a labeled aptamer, a labeled photoaptamer, a labeled small molecule, a labeled interacting partner, a labeled specifically binding protein or peptide, a labeled Darpin, a labeled ankyrin, or a labeled ligand, specifically binding to said G-CSF. The specific labeled antibody fragment may be a labeled Fab fragment, a labeled Fv fragment, or a labeled scFv fragment.
- Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as is commonly understood by one of skill in the art. All publications referenced herein are incorporated by reference thereto. All United States patents and patent applications referenced herein are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety including the drawings.
- The articles “a” and “an” are used herein to refer to one or to more than one, i.e. to at least one of the grammatical object of the article. By way of example, “a sample” means one sample or more than one sample.
- The recitation of numerical ranges by endpoints includes all integer numbers and, where appropriate, fractions subsumed within that range (e.g. 1 to 5 can include 1, 2, 3, 4 when referring to, for example, a number of samples, and can also include 1.5, 2, 2.75 and 3.80, when referring to, for example, concentrations). The recitation of end points also includes the end point values themselves (e.g. from 1.0 to 5.0 includes both 1.0 and 5.0)
- As mentioned elsewhere present invention relates to an unexpected finding by the inventors that a female subject providing a plurality of oocytes under ovarian hyperstimulation will exhibit a variation in the levels of several cytokines and growth factors present in the follicular fluid of the follicle from which each oocyte is derived. Furthermore, the inventors found there is a strong correlation between a high level of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) present in the follicular fluid of the individual follicle from which an oocyte is derived and a high implantation potential of an embryo obtained by fertilization of said oocyte. It has never been demonstrated before that, for the same subject, the follicular fluid surrounding each individual oocyte may vary in composition, and that said composition is indicative of the success of implantation of the subsequently fertilized oocyte. This finding allows a plurality of embryos obtained from a single patient to be ranked in order of implantation potential. For the first time, patients showing a borderline fertility potential using indicators that average oocyte fertility markers (e.g. 11-beta HSD) may be found to have oocytes showing a high implantation potential against a poor overall average; this offer new possibilities for previously infertile-indicating females. Furthermore, the method offers the possibility to rate each oocyte individually and thus embryo individually, without interference to the embryo or oocyte.
- Embodiments of the present invention thus relate to an assay method and assay kit which can be used to predict the outcome of assisted fertilization in a female patient. Embodiments of the invention also relate to such assay and kit for use in a method of fertilization treatment, to improve implantation. Although our invention described below has been developed from research on human female patients, it will be applicable to any mammalian female and can be used to increase the success of, for example, captive breeding programs of endangered species or commercial breeding by assisted fertilization of livestock such as cattle or horses. Preferably the subject has undergone fertility pretreatment (e.g. ovarian hyperstimulation) to increase the number of eggs produced per monthly cycle. Assisted fertilization, as used herein, refers to ex vivo fertilization methods where the oocyte is fertilized outside the female body, such as in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
- One embodiment of the invention is an assay for determining the implantation potential of a plurality of embryos each obtained or to be obtained by assisted fertilisation of an oocyte of a female subject, comprising measuring the levels of G-CSF in the follicular fluid present in the follicle from which each oocyte is derived, and determining the implantation potential of each embryo from the level of follicular fluid G-CSF.
- Another embodiment of the present invention is an assay for determining for a female subject the implantation potential of embryos obtained or to be obtained by assisted fertilisation comprising:
- (i) measuring, for a plurality of oocytes collected from said subject, the level of follicular fluid granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) present in the follicular fluid (FF) of a follicle of each collected oocyte; and
- (ii) determining from the levels of FF G-CSF measured, the implantation potentials of the embryos obtained or to be obtained by assisted fertilization of the oocytes.
- The oocyte from the follicle with the highest level of G-CSF in follicular fluid gives rise to an embryo with the greatest implantation potential.
- Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a naturally generated cytokine belonging to the family of hemopoietic growth factor (Clark, et al., 1987, Science 236(4806):1229). Its main role described is to act on proliferation, differentiation, and activation of hematopoietic cells of the neutrophilic lineage (Mielcarek et al., 1996, Blood 87(2):574, Visani et al., 1995, 18(5-6):423). Primarily produced by hemopoietic cells, G-CSF is also produce by non-hemopoietic cells, such as in the reproduction tract: the human luteinized follicular granulosa cells (Salmassi A, et al, 2004, Fertil Steril, 81 Suppl 1:786), endometrial cells (Giacomini G, et al., 1995, Hum Reprod 10(12):3259), decidua and placenta (Duan J. S., 1990, Osaka City Med J 36(2):81; Miyama M et al., 1998, Osaka City Med J., 44(1):85) and various fetal tissue (Calhoun et al., 1999. Pediatr Res 46(3):333). In the ovary, G-CSF protein and its receptor were located (western blot and immunohistochemistry) mainly in granulosa cells of the follicle and luteal cells (Salmassi, et al., 2004).
- The level of follicular fluid G-CSF (FF G-CSF) is preferably measured within the day of oocyte collection. As is known to the skilled person, follicular aspiration is guided using transvaginal sonography after local or general anesthesia. Each follicular fluid corresponding to one ovarian follicle visualized through vaginal sonography is aspirated individually. The capture of each oocyte does not require any other manipulation because the follicular fluid, which surrounds the oocyte, is aspirated along with the oocyte. Inspection of the follicular fluid under microscope allows immediate identification of the presence of the oocyte. Instead of pooling the follicular fluids and respective oocytes, the oocyte is separated at the time of collection so the levels of FF G-CSF can be individually measured. According to one aspect of the invention, the level of FF G-CSF is measured with 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 hours of oocyte collection, of within a time between any two of the aforementioned values. Preferably the level of FF G-CSF is measured within 1 to 20 hours of oocyte collection.
- The level of FF G-CSF associated with an oocyte can be measured using any suitable quantitative assay. The measuring may be performed, for example, using a method selected from biochemical assay (e.g., solid or liquid phase immunoassay), surface plasmon resonance, fluorescence resonance energy transfer, fluorescence quenching, and fluorescence polarization. Such techniques are well known in the art and are briefly described herein below.
- Biochemical assays generally rely on the immobilization of an analyte component, for example, to a membrane or other solid support, and exposure to a ligand. After washing away excess ligand, bound ligand is detected by immunoassay, or by using labeled ligand (e.g., radio-labeled ligand, fluorescently labeled ligand, particulate labeled ligand etc.). Methods to determine and obtain ligands which bind with high affinity to a specific analyte in are also available in the art; see for example WO89/09088 entitled “Paralog Affinity Chromatography”. In an example of an immunoassay, antibodies against G-CSF may be immobilized onto magnetic beads and exposed to a sample of follicular fluid. Bound G-CSF can be detected using primary and secondary antibody immunoassays to arrive at a concentration. Typically, an immunoassay is calibrated used a set of standards. Solid phase immunoassays are described for example in U.S. Pat. No. 4,376,110. Variations of the immunoassays within the scope of the invention include any competitive or immunometric assay format using anti-G-CSF antibodies, for instance RIA (radio-immunoassay), ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), ELISPOT (enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot) or Luminex (bead-based multiplex sandwich immunoassay).
- The levels FF G-CSF are preferably measured by using Luminex technology. Luminex is a highly sensitive method for measuring simultaneously the levels of specific components in a system. It makes use of solid phase, colour (dye) coded microspheres that are small enough to behave almost as a solution in a liquid. Each microsphere is coated with an antibody, or other ligand-binding reagent specific for the detected components (e.g. FF G-CSF). The components of the sample are captured and detected on the microspheres. Within an analyzer, lasers excite the internal dyes that identify each microsphere particle, and also any reporter dye captured during the assay. Many readings are made on each bead set, to validate the results. In this way, a sensitive multiplex assay is made that is both rapid and precise. Preferably, the levels of FF G-CSF are measured using a kit(s) manufactured by Biorad® or R and D®. In a preferred embodiment the Biorad® kit is the Human Cytokine Fluorescent Bead Immunoassay Assay Kit, Bio-Plex™ (Hercules, Calif., USA, 17A11127). In another preferred embodiment, the R and D kit is the LUH000, LUH279, LUH270, LUH271, LUH278, LUH208, LUH214, LUH215B, LUH285, LUH200, LUH280, LUH201, LUH202, LUH204, LUH205, LUH206, LUH217, LUH317, LUH210, LUH293, LUB000, LUB320, LUB294, LUB219, and/or LUB213 kit. For the purposes of this invention, the term “antibody”, unless specified to the contrary, includes monoclonal antibodies, polyclonal antibodies, and fragments of whole antibodies which retain their binding activity for a target antigen. Such fragments include Fv, F(ab′) and F(ab′)2 fragments, as well as single chain antibodies. Furthermore, the antibodies and fragments thereof may be humanized antibodies, e.g. as described in EP-A-239400 (Winter).
- Antibodies against FF G-CSF may be monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies may be prepared by conventional hybridoma technology using the proteins or peptide fragments thereof, as an immunogen. Polyclonal antibodies may also be prepared by conventional means which comprise inoculating a host animal, for example a rat or a rabbit, with a peptide of the invention and recovering immune serum.
- Alternatively, levels of FF G-CSF may be estimated by analyzing the levels of FF G-CSF mRNA in the granulosa cells. Granulosa cells around the corona radiata may be stored at the stage of the decoronisation of each oocytes and be stored in RNA stabiliser (e.g. at 80° C.) until assay. Probes for the FF G-CSF gene may be designed for use as probes, for example for use in a nucleic acid (PCR) amplification assay and/or hybridization. Methods and conditions for performing a PCR and hybridization reactions are known in the art, and can be found, for example, in Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Third Edition) (Joseph Sambrook, Peter MacCallum, David Russell, Cold Spring Habor Laboratory Press) or could be performed by a quantigene plex assay, which is designed to quantitate multiple target-specific RNA molecules (Panomics).
- A surface plasmon resonance assay may, alternatively, be used as a quantitative method to measure the level of G-CSF in a follicular fluid sample. A chip-bound anti-G-CSF antibody is challenged with a follicular fluid and the surface plasmon resonance measured. Binding reactions are performed using standard concentrations to arrive at the levels of G-CSF of G-CSF in the follicular fluid.
- FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) may also be used to measure the level of G-CSF in a follicular fluid sample. The G-CSF and anti-G-CSF antibody are labeled with a complementary pair of donor and acceptor fluorophores. While bound closely together by the G-CSF: anti-G-CSF antibody interaction, the fluorescence emitted upon excitation of the donor fluorophore will have a different wavelength than that emitted in response to that excitation wavelength when the G-CSF and anti-G-CSF antibody are not bound, providing for quantitation of bound versus unbound molecules by measurement of emission intensity at each wavelength. Binding reactions can be compared with a set of standards to arrive at the level of G-CSF in the follicular fluid.
- BRET (bioluminescence resonance energy transfer) may also be used to measure the level of G-CSF in a follicular fluid sample. Light is emitted by an acceptor when in close proximity to the donor, i.e., when a G-CSF: anti-G-CSF antibody interaction complex is formed. By comparing the interaction with a set of standards, the level of G-CSF in the follicular fluid is determined.
- Fluorescence quenching fluorescence similarly provides a measurement of G-CSF levels. Generally, a decrease in fluorescence of the labeled anti-G-CSF antibody is indicative that the G-CSF bearing the quencher has bound. Of course, a similar effect would arise when a G-CSF is fluorescently labeled and anti-G-CSF antibody bears the quencher. By comparing the interaction with a set of standards, the level of G-CSF in a follicular fluid sample can be measured.
- Fluorescence polarization measurement can also determine the level of G-CSF in a follicular fluid sample. Complexes, such as those formed by G-CSF associating with a fluorescently anti-G-CSF antibody, would have higher polarization values than uncomplexed, labelled anti-G-CSF antibody. This form the basis for determining the levels of G-CSF in a follicular fluid sample, which measurements are typically performed concurrent with a set of standard G-CSF concentrations.
- Other methods that can be used for quantitatively assaying G-CSF in the FF include mass spectrometry (MS), high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), HPLC/MS, HPLC/MS/MS, capillary electrophoresis and rod or slab gel electrophoresis associated with image analysis. Such techniques are well known in the art as described, for example, in Modern HPLC for Practicing Scientists (Dong, M, Wiley-Interscience, June 2006), Tandem Mass Spectrometry (McLafferty F. W. John Wiley & Sons Inc, November, 1983), Mass Spectrometry for Biotechnology (Siuzdak, G., Academic Press, February 1996), Clinical Applications of Capillary Electrophoresis (Methods in Molecular Medicine) (Palfrey S. M., Humana Press, June 1999), Handbook of Capillary Electrophoresis, Second Edition, (Landers J. P. CRC; December 1996), High-Resolution Electrophoresis and Immunofixation: Techniques and Interpretation (Keren, D. F. Hodder Arnold, January, 1994).
- Once the levels of FF G-CSF have been measured in a plurality of oocytes from a single patient, the results may be used to establish the relative implantation potential of embryos obtained by fertilization of said oocytes i.e. a ranking order. The level of FF G-CSF may be used to determine whether all, some or none of the oocytes will after fertilization establish implantation in a female subject undergoing assisted fertilization treatment. In addition, the level of FF G-CSF may be used to determine whether all, some or none of the embryos will implant in a female subject undergoing assisted fertilization treatment.
- In our studies, we have measured levels of FF G-CSF using immunoassays, in particular using Luminex technology from Biorad and R&D. We have found that those embryos derived from oocytes having a concentration of FF G-CSF equal to or less than 20.0 pg/ml show a reduced or no implantation success. In contrast, embryos derived from oocytes having a concentration of FF G-CSF above 24 pg/ml show a certain implantation.
- Those of skill in the art will appreciate that although in our research we have determined a “threshold” level of FF G-CSF below which embryos are not implanted (and above which patients have significantly improved probability of implantation), the value is a statistical measure and other measurements and thresholds can be used. In practicing the invention, it is most important to achieve consistency of assay, and so each individual practitioner (or assisted fertilization team) will be capable of establishing their own particular assay method and determining their own threshold level. This could be established by first conducting a historical study on samples from previous patients.
- Thus, the level of FF G-CSF mentioned above represents the measure we have used in our studies as a suitable limit. However, if levels of FF G-CSF were to be measured in any of the other ways mentioned above, it would be desirable to conduct, using routine procedures, a control using our method of assay in order to determine the relationship between our results and the results of other methods, in order to make direct comparisons.
- According to one aspect of the invention, an embryo derived from an oocyte where a level of FF G-CSF in its follicle is equal to or less than 21.6 pg/ml, 21.4 pg/ml, 21.2 pg/ml, 21.0 pg/ml, 20.8 pg/ml, 20.6 pg/ml, 20.4 pg/ml, 20.2 pg/ml, 20.0 pg/ml, 19.8 pg/ml, 19.6 pg/ml, 19.4 pg/ml, 19.2 pg/ml, 19.0 pg/ml, 18.8 pg/ml, 18.6 pg/ml, 18.4 pg/ml, 18.2 pg/ml, 18.0 pg/ml 17.8 pg/ml, 17.6 pg/ml, 17.4 pg/ml, 17.2 pg/ml, 17.0 pg/ml, 16.8 pg/ml, 16.6 pg/ml, 16.4 pg/ml, 16.2 pg/ml, 16.0 pg/ml, 15.8 pg/ml, 15.6 pg/ml, 15.4 pg/ml, 15.2 pg/ml, 15.0 pg/ml or a level between any two of the aforementioned values, is predicted to have a low implantation potential. Preferably, a level of FF G-CSF equal to or less than 15.0 pg/ml to 20.0 pg/ml, more preferably equal to or less than 19.8 to 20.6 pg/ml, most preferably less than 20.6 pg/ml is predicted to have no or a low implantation potential. The levels of this embodiment are considered threshold levels for a method of assisted fertilization (below). A low level of implantation is a probability of implantation of 10%, 9%, 8% or less.
- According to one aspect of the invention, an embryo derived from an oocyte where a level of FF G-CSF in its follicle is equal to or less than 34.0 pg/ml, 33.5 pg/ml, 33.0 pg/ml, 32.5 pg/ml, 32.0 pg/ml, 31.5 pg/ml, 31.0 pg/ml, 30.5 pg/ml, 30.0 pg/ml, 29.5 pg/ml, 29.0 pg/ml, 28.5 pg/ml, 28.0 pg/ml, 27.5 pg/ml, 27.0 pg/ml, 26.5 pg/ml, 26.0 pg/ml, 25.5 pg/ml, 25.0 pg/ml, 24.5 pg/ml, 24.0 pg/ml, 23.5 pg/ml, 23.0 pg/ml, 22.5 pg/ml, 22.0 pg/ml, 21.5 pg/ml, 21.0 pg/ml, 20.5 pg/ml, 20.0 pg/ml, 19.5 pg/ml, 19.0 pg/ml, 18.5 pg/ml, 18.0 pg/ml, 17.5 pg/ml, 17.0 pg/ml, 16.5 pg/ml, 16.0 pg/ml, 15.5 pg/ml, 15.0 pg/ml or a level between any two of the aforementioned values, is predicted to have a likely implantation success. Preferably, a level of FF G-CSF in the range 15.0 pg/ml to 34.0 pg/ml, more preferably in the range 20.0 to 24.0 pg/ml predicted to be likely to be implanted. Likely to be implanted means a higher chance of success that no certainty of implantation; a likely potential of implantation means a probability of implantation of 15% to 25%. The levels of this embodiment are considered threshold levels for a method of assisted fertilization (below).
- According to one aspect of the invention, an embryo derived from an oocyte where a level of FF G-CSF in its follicle is equal to or higher than 22.0 pg/ml, 22.1 pg/ml, 22.2 pg/ml, 22.3 pg/ml, 22.4 pg/ml, 22.5 pg/ml, 22.6 pg/ml, 22.7 pg/ml, 22.8 pg/ml, 22.9 pg/ml, 23.0 pg/ml, 23.1 pg/ml, 23.2 pg/ml, 23.3 pg/ml, 23.4 pg/ml, 23.5 pg/ml, 23.6 pg/ml, 23.7 pg/ml, 23.8 pg/ml, 23.9 pg/ml, 24.0 pg/ml, 24.1 pg/ml, 24.2 pg/ml, 24.3 pg/ml, 24.4 pg/ml, 24.5 pg/ml, 24.6 pg/ml, 24.7 pg/ml, 24.8 pg/ml, 24.9 pg/ml, 25.0 pg/ml, 25.1 pg/ml, 25.2 pg/ml, 25.3 pg/ml, 25.4 pg/ml, 25.5 pg/ml, 25.6 pg/ml, 25.7 pg/ml, 25.8 pg/ml, 25.9 pg/ml, 26.0 pg/ml, 26.1 pg/ml, 26.2 pg/ml, 26.3 pg/ml or a level between any two of the aforementioned values, is predicted to have a high implantation potential. Preferably, a level of FF-CSF equal to or higher than 24.0 pg/ml, more preferably higher than 35 pg/ml is predicted to have a high implantation potential. The levels of this embodiment are considered threshold levels for a method of assisted fertilization (below). A high level of implantation is a probability of implantation of 30%, 35%, 40%, 43%, 44% or more.
- If levels of FF G-CSF in such patients is significantly below the level associated with likely or certain implantation in all collected oocytes, then there would be a saving in time, money and stress to the patient not to undertake implantation. In such cases, it will be possible for the practitioner (or assisted fertilization clinic) to decide whether or not to even attempt a first implantation. On the other hand, if one or more oocytes indicate a high or complete certainty of implantation, these oocytes alone may be fertilized and the embryos so obtain implanted, so saving money and resources by fertilizing only those oocytes likely to become established as embryos. Alternatively, all the oocytes may be fertilized, and only those embryos derived from oocytes indicating a high or complete certainty of implantation, are implanted; this allows a higher chance of success as the indication of implantation does not necessarily correlated with chances of fertilization.
- The present invention significantly increase the implantation rate while decreasing the number of embryos replaced. It also allows a specialist to become more efficient in preventing multiple pregnancies and all the related fetal and maternal morbidity. The oocyte and thus the embryo with the highest potential can be implanted implant, therefore, allows a policy of single embryo transfer while not decreasing the overall pregnancy rate.
- The assay described herein may also be employed in a method of assisting the fertilization of a female subject. One embodiment of the invention is a method for assisted fertilization of a female subject comprising:
- (i) collecting a plurality of oocytes from said subject,
- (ii) determining the level of FF G-CSF in the follicle of each collected oocyte,
- (iii) fertilizing the oocytes having the highest FF G-CSF levels, and
- (iv) implanting the embryo so obtained into the female subject.
- The number of oocytes subjected to further fertilization may be 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 or more. Alternatively, 50%, 40%, 30%, 20%, or 10% of the oocytes are fertilized, which percentage have the highest levels of FF G-CSF.
- Another embodiment of the invention is a method for assisted fertilization of a female subject comprising:
- (i) collecting a plurality of oocytes from said subject,
- (ii) determining the level of FF G-CSF in the follicle of each collected oocyte,
- (iii) fertilizing the oocytes to obtain embryos,
- (iv) implanting the embryos derived from oocytes having the highest FF G-CSF levels.
- The number of embryos implanted may be 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 or more. Alternatively, 50%, 40%, 30%, 20%, or 10% of the embryos are implanted, which percentage have the highest levels of FF G-CSF.
- Another embodiment of the invention is a method for assisted fertilization of a female subject comprising:
- (i) collecting a plurality of oocytes from said subject,
- (ii) determining the level of FF G-CSF in the follicle of each collected oocyte,
- (iii) fertilizing the oocytes to obtain embryos,
- (iv) implanting the embryos derived from oocytes having a FF G-CSF level above a predetermined threshold.
- The number of embryos implanted may be 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 or more. Alternatively, 50%, 40%, 30%, 20%, or 10% of the embryos are implanted, which percentage have the highest levels of FF G-CSF.
- Another embodiment of the invention is a method for assisted fertilisation of a female subject comprising:
- (i) collecting a plurality of oocytes from said subject,
- (ii) determining the implantation potential for an embryo derived from each oocyte according to the assay as defined above,
- (iii) fertilizing the oocytes corresponding to embryos having a high potential for implantation, and
- (iv) implanting the embryo so obtained into the female subject.
- Another embodiment of the invention is a method for assisted fertilization of a female subject comprising:
- (i) collecting a plurality of oocytes from said subject,
- (ii) determining the implantation potential for an embryo derived from each oocyte according to the assay as defined above,
- (iii) fertilizing the oocytes to obtain embryos, and
- (iv) implanting the embryos having the highest implantation potential.
- The embodiments described above in regard of the assay apply to corresponding embodiments of the method of assisted fertilization. The threshold values are indicated elsewhere herein. The skilled person will understand that intervening steps may be present such as freezing after oocyte collection. By use of the present invention, it will be possible for assisted fertilization clinics to allocate resources more efficiently, so that patients with low levels of FF G-CSF in the follicle of a recovered oocyte who are unlikely to become pregnant by assisted fertilization treatment are not treated.
- Kits for use in performing the assay of the invention may be provided. Such kits include at least one reagent useful for the detection of FF G-CSF.
- Suitable reagents include one or more of a specific antibody fragment, nanobody, affibody, an aptamer, a photoaptamer, a small molecule, an interacting partner, a specifically binding protein or peptide, a Darpin, or an ankyrin, an isotopically labeled tracer, or a ligand, specifically binding to said G-CSF, optionally be linked to a label. The specific antibody fragment is a Fab fragment, an Fv fragment, or a scFv fragment.
- The reagents and their preparation are well known in the art, and do not require elaboration. Nonetheless, for the sake of completeness, a brief summary of some of the reagents is provided. A nanobody is a single-domain antibody having a single monomeric variable antibody domain able to bind selectively to a specific antigen. A specifically binding nanobody may be prepared from a library of engineered nanobodies having a different binding regions, screened against a target. Phage display technology may be employed to select binding recombinant strains. Suitable construction and screening techniques are mentioned in WO 94/04678. An affibody is an engineered binding molecule having high stability and specificity, containing three alpha helices as a protein scaffold. The were first described in Nord, K; Nilsson, J; et al (1995). “A combinatorial library of an α-helical bacterial receptor domain”. Prot. Eng. 8 (6): 601-608. A specifically binding affibody may be prepared from a library of engineered affibody having a different binding region, screened against a target. Phage display technology may be employed to select binding recombinant strains. A Darpin (designed ankyrin repeat proteins) is an engineered specific binding protein containing a number of repeats (e.g. 2, 3, 4, 5 6 or more) of an ankyrin subunit. A specifically binding Darpin may be prepared from a library of engineered Darpins having a different binding region, screened against a target. Phage display technology may be employed to select binding recombinant strains. Suitable construction and screening techniques are mentioned in WO 02/20565 and WO 2010/060748. Aptamers are engineered oligonucleic acid or peptide molecules typically having a scaffold and variable binding domain, that binds to a specific target molecule; as with others they may be screened against a target using phage display technology.
- Suitable reagents include antibodies, or other suitable ligand-binding reagents, against FF G-CSF optionally linked to a label. Typical labels are those commonly used in immunoassay procedures, for example horse radish peroxidase. The kit may also contain standards, for examples predetermined amounts of FF G-CSF (e.g. protein or RNA) may be labeled with a detectable label. The kit may also contain disposable aspirator tips for use in extracting the oocytes and follicular fluid.
- The kit may be used for the measurement of FF G-CSF for use in a method of diagnosis, prognosis, and/or assisted fertilization treatment of a female subject. The invention further provides the use of a reagent for the detection of FF G-CSF for the prognosis of the likelihood of establishing pregnancy by assisted fertilization in a female subject.
- The abovementioned antibodies, fragments and variants thereof, and other suitable ligand-binding reagents, which may optionally be labeled with a detectable label, may be used for the manufacture of a diagnostic kit for use in the treatment or diagnosis of suitability for assisted fertilization.
- Levels of FF G-CSF may also be assayed via analysis of the levels of FF G-CSF mRNA present in samples obtained. In order to achieve this, FF G-CSF or fragments thereof may be used as a probe to determine levels of G-CSF in the follicular fluid. Alternatively, levels of FF G-CSF may be estimated by analyzing the levels of FF G-CSF mRNA expressed in the follicular fluid or in the granulosa cells. Granulosa cells around the corona radiate may be stored at the stage of the decoronisation of each oocytes and stored in RNA stabiliser (e.g. at 80° C.) until assay. Such probes may also be formulated into kits in a manner analogous to those described for antibodies, and may contain control nucleic acids. Probes for the FF G-CSF gene may be designed for use as probes, for example for use in a nucleic acid amplification assay.
- The following non-limiting examples illustrate certain embodiments of the invention.
- 280 female patients presenting with infertility and included in an ICSI program were recruited between January 2005 to March 2007. The reason for inclusion in ICSI was predominantly male infertility but also previous IVF failure or previous low fertilization rate in conventional IVF. We proceeded to a randomization at the time of inclusion to not introduce biases in the clinical patient selection. Each patient was included one time within the study period. All patients were fully informed, and the Institutional Review Board approved this investigation (Comite Consultatif de Protection des personnes Poissy-St germain en Laye,).
- Patients underwent the classical procedure of ovarian hyperstimulation. We applied the protocol referred by their physician. Response to stimulation was controlled by serial blood tests and ultrasonic evaluation to control follicles and endometrial growth. Criteria for triggering the ovulation was obtained when at least 5 follicles reached 16 mm. The oocytes retrieval took place 35 to 36 hours after the triggering of ovulation. The oocyte aspiration was performed under general or local anesthesia with vaginal ultrasonography using individual 10 ml syringe for each follicle in the studied group. We thus adaptated the classical method of oocyte aspiration in order to individualize the follicular fluid of each oocyte collected.
- The presence or absence of an oocyte in each follicle was immediately assessed and the follicles devoid of an oocyte were discarded. In the studied group, individual follicular fluid sample, each corresponding to one mature oocyte was collected. The volume and the aspect (citrin, orange or hematic) of each follicular fluid sample were recorded. Individual follicular fluid samples were centrifuged and the supernatant aliquoted after proceeding to the anonymisation of each sample according to a database in order to blind subsequent analysis. Samples were initially stored at −20° C., then at −80° C. until assay. All the clinical and biological information were recorded in real-time on the database (Medifirst).
- Oocytes were collected and cumuls and corona cells removed with
hyluronidase 80 IU (Fertipro). Oocyte were injected in a 5 μl drop of flushing medium (JCD), with a sperm sample slowed by PVP medium (fertopto). Injected oocytes were cultured in singly 40 μl microdroplet of ISM1 (Medicult, france) under oil at 37° C. Pronuclei number and aspect were assesses after 20 hours according to Gianaroli criteria. Onday 2, the number, fragmentation and regularity of each blastomere were recorded. Embryo transfer was scheduled onday 2. - We divided the transferred embryos in two categories for analysis:
- 1. the best quality embryos defined by 4-5 cells on
Day 2, 8-9 on Day 3, and less than 10% of fragmentation and regular cells (high quality embryos), or - 2. any other patterns (low quality embryos)
- Only, the follicular fluids corresponding to the embryos transferred were analysed using the Luminex method.
- Each sample was related to a probability of implantation, described here as the implantation rate. The clinical Implantation rate of an embryo is defined for each tested sample as the number of yolk sac/number of embryos transferred. Clinical implantation was defined at 8 weeks of amenorrhea by the ultrasonic visualization of a yolk sac.
- There is therefore three main categories in function of the outcome:
-
- No implantation: Implantation Rate=0
- Certain implantation: The number of embryos replaced was equal to the number of yolk sac observed by ultrasound at 8 weeks of amenorrhea (1 embryo replaced and single pregnancy, two embryos replaced and twin pregnancy): Implantation Rate=1
- Likely implantation which is a probability of implantation since the number of yolk sac is lower than the number of embryos replaced (e.g 1 out of 2, 1 out of 3, 2 out of 3, hence Implantation Rate=0.5, 0.33, 0.66).
- To construct the ROC curve (Receiver Operating Charateristics), we only took in account the two categories
-
- No implantation,
- Certain implantation: The number of embryos replaced was equal to the number of yolk sac observed by ultrasound at 8 weeks of amenorrhea (1 embryo replaced and single pregnancy, two embryos replaced and twin pregnancy)
- The discrimination attained between no implantation and certain implantation in function of the concentration of G-CSF in each sample was evaluated with ROC curve analysis (MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium). Sensitivity, specificity and the area under curve (AUC) ROC were obtained for the three methods of detection. In a ROC curve the true positive rate (Sensitivity) is plotted in function of the false positive rate (100-Specificity) for different cut-off points. Each point on the ROC plot represents a sensitivity/specificity pair corresponding to a particular decision threshold. A test with perfect discrimination (no overlap in the two distributions) has a ROC plot that passes through the upper left corner (100% sensitivity, 100% specificity). Therefore, the closer the ROC plot is to the upper left corner, the higher the overall accuracy of the test (Zweig & Campbell, 1993). Calculation of the AUC-ROC provides the quantitative of accuracy, i.e. the ability of G-CSF to discriminate between implantation and no implantation.
- However, most of the embryos that implant were defined by a probability of implantation. For example, if two embryos were transferred and only one implanted, each sample is characterized by a probability of 50% of implantation.
- We thus defined for each method
-
- Lower threshold of implantation defined by a negative predictive value of 100% from the AUC-ROC curve.
- Higher threshold of implantation defined by the highest positive predictive value for implantation.
- Two Luminex methods of detection were successively applied for individual follicular fluid samples from which transferred embryos were issue.
- From January, 2005 to June 2005
-
- The Luminex technology was applied with the kit Biorad (Hercules, Ca, USA, 17A11127, human cytokines, 27-plex kit).
- From September 2005 to March 2007
- 80 of the samples were common to the previous Luminex biorad, and 120 were new samples collected
-
- The Luminex technology was applied with the R and D kit (Minneapolis, Minn., USA, LUH000, LUH279, LUH270, LUH271, LUH278, LUH208, LUH214, LUH215B, LUH285, LUH200, LUH280, LUH201, LUH202, LUH204, LUH205, LUH206, LUH217, LUH317, LUH210, LUH293, LUB000, LUB320, LUB294, LUB219, LUB213)
- Multivariate and univariate analysis were performed. A p value below 0.05 was considered as significant. Table 1 summarizes the population and the number of samples analyzed successively using the two of the methods of investigation applied.
-
TABLE 1 Population and the number of samples analyzed successively using two of the methods of investigation applied. Luminex Luminex Parameter measured BIORAD R&D Number of patients included 71 121 Number of individual follicular fluids analysed 132 200 corresponding to an transferred embryo Mean Clinical Pregnancy Rate 31.5% 27.3% Mean implantation rate 20% 18% - Evaluations using the Biorad® and R and D® Luminex kits are elaborated in Examples 2 and 3.
- 132 follicular fluid samples corresponding to the subsequent 132 transferred embryos were analyzed for levels of certain cytokines and chemokines. In particular, concentrations of IL-1beta, IL-1Ra, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-15, IL-17, IFN alpha, TNF-alpha, G-CSF, GM-CSF, VEGF, PDGF, FGF, IP-10, MCP-1, RANTES, EOTAXIN, MIP-1 alpha, MIP-1 beta were evaluated using Luminex technology, utilizing a a Biorad® Luminex® Kit.
- The following results were obtained:
- 1) LIF, IL-1ra, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, G-CSF, VEGF, IP-10, MCP-1, Eotaxin and MIP-beta were detected in all the follicular fluid samples,
- 2) IL-1 beta, IL-5, IL-7, IL-17, TNF alpha, MIP-alpha were detected not detected in any follicular fluid sample,
- 3) IL-15, GM-CSF, Rantes, PDGF, IFN-gamma, IL-9, IL-2, IL-15, FGF were detected respectively in 95%, 94%, 88%, 81%, 76%, 65%, 60%, 48% and 22% of the follicular fluid samples.
- G-CSF was not related to the embryo morphology if compared in regard the two categories best embryo quality versus others. Therefore, there was no correlation between G-CSF and embryo morphological quality (High quality versus other quality transferred embryos)
- Only one cytokine was associated in either univariate and multivariate analysis with the potential of the corresponding embryo to implant, which was the Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating factor (G-CSF)
- Embryos were Classified According to their Implantation Rates.
- To construct the AUC-ROC for G-CSF, we took into account embryos that did not implant (n=89) and the ones that exhibited implantation (n=13). Certain implantation is defined when all the embryos replaced leads to a yolk sac.
- The area under the ROC curve was 0.82 [0.73-0.89] and highly significant (p=0.0001) (
FIG. 1 ). Thus, G-CSF is correlated with the implantation rate (r=0.40 p<0.0001). - We also found a significant difference between embryos with certain implantation and no implantation (p=0.0002) and between embryos with certain implantation and likely implantation (p=0.001) (Table 2)
-
TABLE 2 Correlation between implantation success and levels of FF G-CSF and FF IL-1ra measured using a Luminex kit manufactured by Biorad Number of FF FF IL-1ra +/− embryos G-CSF +/− standard standard Implantation concerned error (pg/ml) error (pg/ml) Certain implantation 13 25.3 +/− 1 764 +/− 373 Likely implantation 30 21.6 +/− 1 225 +/− 106 No implantation 89 20.2 +/− 0.4 148 +/− 17 - According to the AUC-ROC curve, we defined a lower threshold and upper threshold for G-CSF to evaluate if G-CSF concentration may be used to evaluate for each embryo a “potential of implantation” in order to decide the number of embryos we should replace.
- The lower threshold was defined by the stronger negative predictive value of implantation. If G-CSF is lower than 20 pg/ml, negative predictive value is at 100% from AUC-ROC. If G-CSF is over 24, positive predictive value reaches its maximum: 40%
- If all the embryos replaced are evaluated according to the level of G-CSF, we can observe the subsequent differences of the implantation rate (Table 3).
-
TABLE 3 Correlation between implantation success and levels of FF G-CSF measured using a Luminex kit manufactured by Biorad; *p = 0.003 between medium and low G-CSF; **p < 0.001 between high and low G-CSF Number of embryos Mean implantation G-CSF (Luminex biorad) concerned rate Low G-CSF 45 9% (Below 20 pg/ml) Medium G-CSF 62 18%* (Between 20 to 24 pg/ml) High G-CSF 25 44%** (Over 24 pg/m)l - 200 follicular fluid samples corresponding to the subsequent 200 transferred embryos were analyzed. The concentrations of the following cytokines and chemokines IL-1 alpha, IL-1beta, IL-1Ra, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, IFN alpha, TNF-alpha, G-CSF, GM-CSF, MIP-1 alpha, MIP-1 beta, RANTES, MCP-1, VEGF, were evaluated using Luminex technology utilizing the kit made by R&D.
- G-CSF, IL-1 Ra; IL-6, IL-8, MIP-beta, RANTES, MCP-1, VEGF were detected in 95 to 100% of the follicular fluid samples tested:
-
- IL-4, TNF-alpha, GM-CSF, IL-5 were detected in 75% to 94% of the follicular fluid samples tested,
- IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-10, MIP-alpha were detected in 50 to 74% of the follicular fluid samples tested,
- IL-2, IFN-gamma and IL-17 were detected in less than 50% of the follicular fluid samples tested.
- To construct the AUC-ROC for G-CSF, we took in account embryos that did not implant (n=146) and the ones that certainly implanted (n=16) The area under the ROC curve was at 0.72 [0.65-0.79] and highly significant (p=0.0025) (
FIG. 2 ) - A significant difference was observed for G-CSF between embryos with certain implantation and no implantation (p=0.01) success and between embryos with likely implantation success and certain implantation success (p=0.03) (Table 4)
-
TABLE 4 Correlation between implantation success and levels of FF G-CSF measured using a Luminex kit manufactured by R and D. Number of embryos G-CSF(pg/ml) +/− Implantation concerned standard error Certain implantation 16 28 +/− 2.3 Likely implantation 37 20.5 +/− 1.7 No implantation 146 20.7 +/− 0.9 - G-CSF was detected in all fluids and with low standard variations from a sample to another which is a strong requirement to identify a biomarker. According to the AUC-ROC curve, we defined a lower threshold and upper threshold for G-CSF to evaluate if G-CSF concentration may be used to predict for each embryo a “potential of implantation” that would help in the decision of the number of embryos we should replace. The lower threshold was defined by the stronger negative predictive value of implantation. If G-CSF is lower than 15 pg/ml, negative predictive value was 100% from AUC-ROC. If G-CSF was over 34, positive predictive value reaches it maximum of 27.8%.
- If all the embryos replaced are evaluated according to level category defined by the AUC-ROC of G-CSF, we can observe the subsequent differences of the implantation potentiality (TABLE 5).
-
TABLE 5 Correlation between implantation success and levels of FF G-CSF measured using a Luminex kit manufactured by R and D; **p < 0.001 between low, median, and high G-CSF Number of embryos Mean implantation G-CSF concerned rate Low G-CSF 61 9%** (Below 15 pg/ml) Medium G-CSF 117 22%** (Between 15 to 34 pg/ml) High G-CSF 22 43.5%** (Over 35 pg/m)l - Among 15 patients, all the follicular fluids that lead to an embryo independently of its outcome were evaluated in the same cohort. 76 samples were evaluated using the Luminex kit manufactured by Biorad.
- For each sample, we evaluated the following ratio. Mean G-CSF in pooled Follicular fluid Less G-CSF concentration in individual FF (n=76).
-
FIG. 3 is graph showing the variation in concentration of individual follicular fluid of a same cohort of embryos obtained from 10 multiple subjects. Each box shows the variation of individual follicular fluids from the mean in a same cohort of embryos generated. These observation suggests that all the embryos generated are not equal in regard of FF-GCSF and hence in their potential of implantation.
Claims (4)
1. A method of assisted fertilization, comprising:
implanting in a subject an embryo, selected from a plurality of embryos obtained by fertilization of a plurality of oocytes collected from the subject, wherein
at least the oocyte having a highest implantation potential of the plurality is implanted as an embryo, and
the implantation potential is determined from a level of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) present in the follicular fluid (FF) of each oocyte in the plurality of oocytes.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the level of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) present in the follicular fluid (FF) of each oocyte in the plurality of oocytes is determined by radio-immunoassay (RIA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay, surface plasmon resonance, fluorescence resonance energy transfer, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, fluorescence quenching fluorescence, fluorescence polarization, mass spectrometry (MS), high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), HPLC/MS, HPLC/MS/MS, capillary electrophoresis, rod or slab gel electrophoresis.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the oocyte embryo having the highest implantation potential has a level of G-CSF present in the FF which is equal to or greater than 24.0 pg/ml.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein said oocyte having a highest implantation potential has a level of G-CSF present in the FF which is greater than 35.0 pg/ml.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US16/201,184 US20190094234A1 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2018-11-27 | Kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilization |
Applications Claiming Priority (7)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US83209406P | 2006-07-21 | 2006-07-21 | |
PCT/EP2007/057430 WO2008009705A1 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2007-07-18 | Assay and kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilisation |
US37447209A | 2009-01-20 | 2009-01-20 | |
US13/539,660 US9176145B2 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2012-07-02 | Kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilization |
US14/927,264 US9664692B2 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2015-10-29 | Kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilization |
US15/597,617 US10180438B2 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2017-05-17 | Kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilization |
US16/201,184 US20190094234A1 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2018-11-27 | Kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilization |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/597,617 Continuation US10180438B2 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2017-05-17 | Kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilization |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20190094234A1 true US20190094234A1 (en) | 2019-03-28 |
Family
ID=47090725
Family Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/539,660 Expired - Fee Related US9176145B2 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2012-07-02 | Kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilization |
US14/927,264 Active US9664692B2 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2015-10-29 | Kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilization |
US15/597,617 Expired - Fee Related US10180438B2 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2017-05-17 | Kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilization |
US16/201,184 Abandoned US20190094234A1 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2018-11-27 | Kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilization |
Family Applications Before (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/539,660 Expired - Fee Related US9176145B2 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2012-07-02 | Kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilization |
US14/927,264 Active US9664692B2 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2015-10-29 | Kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilization |
US15/597,617 Expired - Fee Related US10180438B2 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2017-05-17 | Kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilization |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (4) | US9176145B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9176145B2 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2015-11-03 | Femalon S.P.R.L. | Kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilization |
EP3999846A4 (en) | 2019-07-25 | 2023-08-09 | Overture Life, Inc | Identification of viable human embryos |
CN112229993B (en) * | 2020-09-24 | 2022-12-02 | 深圳中山泌尿外科医院 | Application of GM-CSF (GM-CSF) factor as biomarker in screening assisted reproductive transplantation embryos and method |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
ATE452190T1 (en) * | 1988-05-13 | 2010-01-15 | Amgen Inc | METHOD FOR ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION OF G-CSF |
JP2685980B2 (en) | 1990-11-26 | 1997-12-08 | 株式会社メニコン | UV absorbing intraocular lens |
JP3441763B2 (en) * | 1993-06-30 | 2003-09-02 | キリン−アムジエン・インコーポレーテツド | Monoclonal antibody and method for measuring human G-CSF using the monoclonal antibody |
GB9603326D0 (en) | 1996-02-16 | 1996-04-17 | Royal Free Hosp School Med | Predictive assay |
NZ530545A (en) | 2001-07-11 | 2006-10-27 | Maxygen Holdings Ltd | Specific conjugates comprising a polypeptide exhibiting G-CSF activity and a non-polypeptide moiety |
WO2005040163A1 (en) * | 2003-10-28 | 2005-05-06 | Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd | Heterocyclic compounds that block the effects of advanced glycation end products (age) |
US7923251B2 (en) | 2005-02-23 | 2011-04-12 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Method and apparatus for avalanche-mediated transfer of agents into cells |
US9176145B2 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2015-11-03 | Femalon S.P.R.L. | Kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilization |
MY150687A (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2014-02-28 | Femalon S P R L | Assay and kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilisation |
-
2012
- 2012-07-02 US US13/539,660 patent/US9176145B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2015
- 2015-10-29 US US14/927,264 patent/US9664692B2/en active Active
-
2017
- 2017-05-17 US US15/597,617 patent/US10180438B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2018
- 2018-11-27 US US16/201,184 patent/US20190094234A1/en not_active Abandoned
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20160047818A1 (en) | 2016-02-18 |
US9664692B2 (en) | 2017-05-30 |
US20120283673A1 (en) | 2012-11-08 |
US20180088125A1 (en) | 2018-03-29 |
US10180438B2 (en) | 2019-01-15 |
US9176145B2 (en) | 2015-11-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8211650B2 (en) | Assay and kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilisation | |
US20190094234A1 (en) | Kit for predicting implantation success in assisted fertilization | |
CA2948039C (en) | A prognostic assay for success of assisted reproductive technology | |
WO2011000805A1 (en) | Biomarkers of oocyte competency and method of use | |
JP2024062396A (en) | Biomarkers for determining fertility and determination method using the same | |
CN108450005A (en) | A method of treatment and prognosis | |
US20210018510A1 (en) | Markers of endoplasmic reticulum stress in ovarian follicular fluid predict ivf success |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |