US20180185720A1

US20180185720A1 - Golf club head with polymeric insert

Info

Publication number: US20180185720A1
Application number: US15/904,540
Authority: US
Inventors: Joshua Boggs
Original assignee: Karsten Manufacturing Corp
Current assignee: Karsten Manufacturing Corp
Priority date: 2014-06-20
Filing date: 2018-02-26
Publication date: 2018-07-05
Also published as: US11338180B2; US9931548B2; US12059602B2; US20220347527A1; US20240390745A1; US10463931B2; US20210138315A1; US20160317880A1; US10850174B2; US20190054354A1; US20200030671A1

Abstract

A golf club head includes a first portion joined to a second portion to at least partially define an interior club head volume. The first portion includes a wall defining an outer boundary of the club head volume, and a support rib extending from the wall to operatively stiffen the first portion. The second portion of the golf club head defines a slot that receives a portion of the support rib, and the support rib is adhered within the slot to join the first portion and the second portion.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/162,658, filed May 24, 2016, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/493,400, filed on Sep. 23, 2014—now U.S. Pat. No. 9,358,432—which claims the benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/015,092, filed Jun. 20, 2014. These references are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to golf clubs and golf club heads, and, in particular, to golf clubs and golf club heads that include polymeric portions.

BACKGROUND

A golf club is generally formed by affixing a club head to a first end of a flexible shaft, and affixing a grip member to a second end of the shaft. Convention and the USGA Rules of Golf have established certain terminology to describe different portions and angular relationships of a club head. For example, a wood-type club head includes a face or striking face, a crown, a sole, a heel, a toe, a back, and a hosel. These club head portions are most easily described when the club head is positioned in a reference position relative to a ground plane. In the reference position, the lie angle of the club (i.e., the angle formed between the shaft and the ground plane) and the loft angle of the club (i.e., the angle formed between the face and the ground plane) are oriented as specified by the manufacturer.
The sole of the club head is generally disposed on an opposite side of the club head from the crown, and is further disposed on an opposite side of the club head from the shaft. When in the reference position, the sole of the club head is intended to contact the ground plane. For the portion of the club that is to the rear of the face, the crown may be separated from the sole at the point on the club head where the surface tangent of the club head is normal to the ground plane.
The hosel is the portion of the club head that is intended to couple the club head with the shaft. The hosel includes an internal bore that is configured to receive the shaft or a suitable shaft adapter. In a configuration where the shaft is directly inserted into the hosel, the hosel bore may have a center hosel-axis that is substantially coincident with a center longitudinal-axis of the shaft. For club head embodiments including a shaft adapter, the shaft may be received in a suitable shaft adapter bore that has a center adapter-axis, which may be substantially coincident with the shaft axis. The shaft adapter-axis may be offset angularly and/or linearly from the hosel-axis to permit adjustment of club parameters via rotation of the shaft adapter with respect to club head, as is known by persons skilled in the art.
The heel may be defined as the portion of the club head that is proximate to and including the hosel. Conversely, the toe may be the area of the golf club that is the farthest from the shaft. Finally, the back of the club head may be the portion of the club head that is generally opposite the face.
Two key parameters that affect the performance and forgiveness of a club include the magnitude and location of the club head's center of gravity (COG) and the various moments of inertia (MOI) about the COG. The club's moments of inertia relate to the club's resistance to rotation (particularly during an off-center hit). These are often perceived as the club's measure of “forgiveness.” In typical driver designs, high moments of inertia are desired to reduce the club's tendency to push or fade a ball. Achieving a high moment of inertia generally involves placing mass as close to the perimeter of the club as possible (to maximize the moment of inertia about the center of gravity), and as close to the toe as possible (to maximize a separate moment of inertia about the shaft).
While the various moments of inertia affect the forgiveness of a club head, the location of the center of gravity can also affect the trajectory of a shot for a given face loft angle. For example, a center of gravity that is positioned as far rearward (i.e., away from the face) and as low (i.e., close to the sole) as possible typically results in a ball flight that has a higher trajectory than a club head with a center of gravity placed more forward and/or higher.
While a high moment of inertia is obtained by increasing the perimeter weighting of the club head, an increase in the total mass/swing weight of the club head (i.e., the magnitude of the center of gravity) has a strong, negative effect on club head speed and hitting distance. Said another way, to maximize club head speed (and hitting distance), a lower total mass is desired; however a lower total mass generally reduces the club head's moment of inertia (and forgiveness).
The desire for a faster swing speed (i.e., lower mass) and greater forgiveness (i.e., larger MOI or specifically placed COG) presents a difficult optimization problem. These competing constraints explain why most drivers/woods are formed from hollow, thin-walled bodies, with nearly all of the mass being positioned as far from the COG as possible (i.e., to maximize the various MOI's). Additionally, removable/interchangeable weights have been used to alter other dynamic, swing parameters and/or to move the COG. Therefore, the total of all club head mass is the sum of the total amount of structural mass and the total amount of discretionary mass. Typical driver designs generally have a total club head mass of from about 195 g to about 215 g.
Structural mass generally refers to the mass of the materials that are required to provide the club head with the structural resilience needed to withstand repeated impacts. Structural mass is highly design-dependant, and provides a designer with a relatively low amount of control over specific mass distribution.
Discretionary mass is any additional mass (beyond the minimum structural requirements) that may be added to the club head design for the sole purpose of customizing the performance and/or forgiveness of the club. In an ideal club design, for a constant total swing weight, the amount of structural mass would be minimized (without sacrificing resiliency) to provide a designer with additional discretionary mass to customize club performance.
While this provided background description attempts to clearly explain certain club-related terminology, it is meant to be illustrative and not limiting. Custom within the industry, rules set by golf organizations such as the United States Golf Association (USGA) or the R&A, and naming convention may augment this description of terminology without departing from the scope of the present application.

SUMMARY

A golf club head includes a first portion joined to a second portion to at least partially define an interior club head volume. The first portion includes a wall defining an outer boundary of the club head volume, and a support rib extending from the wall to operatively stiffen the first portion. The second portion of the golf club head defines a slot that receives a portion of the support rib, and the support rib is adhered within the slot to join the first portion and the second portion.
In some embodiments, the first portion and second portion may define a lap joint therebetween. The first portion and second portion may be further adhered together at the lap joint, which may be at an angle to a plane containing the support rib. The present invention provides a manner of constructing a multi-piece club head that has improved bonding between the joined components. These techniques may be particularly useful when bonding certain polymeric materials that have low surface energies and are traditionally difficult to adhere.
The above features and advantages and other features and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best modes for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic exploded perspective view of a golf club head having a polymeric insert.

FIG. 2 is a schematic bottom view of the golf club head provided in FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a schematic bottom view of a metallic body of a golf club head.

FIG. 4 is a schematic side view of the face of a golf club head.

FIG. 5 is a schematic cross-sectional view of the golf club head of FIG. 4, taken along line 5-5.

FIG. 6 is a schematic top view of an insert that is configured to be disposed in an opening provided in a body of a golf club head.

FIG. 7 is a schematic perspective view of the underside of the insert provided in FIG. 6.

FIG. 8 is a schematic bottom view of the insert provided in FIG. 6.

FIG. 9 is a schematic, partially exploded perspective view of a golf club head.

FIG. 10 is a schematic, cross-sectional view of the golf club head of FIG. 9, taken along line 10-10.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present technology generally relates to a golf club head that is formed by joining a first portion to a second portion to at least partially define an interior volume of the club head. The two portions are joined together with the aid of a support rib that extends between the two portions to both stiffen the club head and to promote adhesion between the portions. This head design may be particularly useful in a wood-style head, such as a driver, fairway wood, or hybrid iron.
Referring to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to identify like or identical components in the various views, FIGS. 1-8 schematically illustrate a first embodiment of the present design. Specifically, FIG. 1 illustrates an exploded perspective view 10 of a golf club head 12 that includes a first, body portion 14 (“body 14”) and a second, insert portion 16 (“insert 16”). The body 14 and insert 16 may be secured together to define a closed, interior club head volume. Additionally, one or more weights 18 may be selectively coupled with the body 14 and/or insert 16 to provide a user with an ability to alter the stock performance and weight distribution of the club head 12.
As shown, the body 14 includes a face 20, a sole 22, a hosel 24, and a crown 26 (i.e., where the crown 26 is disposed on an opposite side of the club head 12 from the sole 22). A heel portion 28 may generally be defined on a first side of the face 20, and may include the hosel 24. Likewise, a toe portion 30 may generally be defined on an opposite side of the face 20 from the heel portion 28.
The body 12 may be formed through any suitable manufacturing process that may be used to form a substantially hollow body. In the illustrated embodiment, the body 14 may be formed from a metal alloy using processes such as stamping, casting, molding, and/or forging. The body 14 may be either a single unitary component, or may comprise various subcomponents that may subsequently be fused together. Examples of suitable light-weight metal alloys may include, for example, stainless steel (e.g., AISI type 304 or AISI type 630 stainless steel), titanium alloys (e.g., a Ti-6Al-4V or Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V Titanium alloy), amorphous metal alloys, or other similar materials.
The body 14 may define an opening 32 that is adapted to receive the insert 14. In one configuration, the opening 32 may be provided entirely in the sole 22, however, in other configurations, the opening 32 may also extend to include a portion of the crown 26. As generally shown in FIG. 2, the insert 16 may be secured to the body 14 such that it entirely covers the opening 32.
To reduce structural mass beyond what is economically viable with metal alloys, the insert 16 may be formed from a polymeric material that is affixed to the body 14 in a manner to withstand repeated shock/impact loadings. The comparatively low density nature of polymeric materials also permits greater design flexibility, at less of a structural weight penalty, than similar designs made from metal. In one configuration, the desired design flexibility may be achieved by molding the polymeric material into shape using a molding technique, such as, injection molding, compression molding, blow molding, thermoforming or the like. To provide the maximum design flexibility, the preferred molding technique is injection molding.
While weight savings and design flexibility are important, the polymeric material must still be strong enough to withstand the stress that is experienced when the club head 12 impacts a ball. This may be accomplished through a combination of structural and material design choices. With regard to material selection, it is preferable to use a moldable polymeric material that has a tensile strength of greater than about 180 MPa (according to ASTM D638), or more preferably greater than about 220 MPa.
In one embodiment, the insert 16 may be formed from a polymeric material that comprises a resin and a plurality of discontinuous fibers (i.e., “chopped fibers”). The discontinuous/chopped fibers may include, for example, chopped carbon fibers or chopped glass fibers and are embedded within the resin prior to molding the insert 16. In one configuration, the polymeric material may be a “long fiber thermoplastic” where the discontinuous fibers are embedded in a thermoplastic resin and each have a designed fiber length of from about 3 mm to about 12 mm. In another configuration, the polymeric material may be a “short fiber thermoplastic” where the discontinuous fibers are similarly embedded in a thermoplastic resin, though may each have a designed length of from about 0.01 mm to about 3 mm. In either case, the fiber length may be affected by the molding process, and due to breakage, a portion of the fibers may be shorter than the described range. Additionally, in some configurations, discontinuous chopped fibers may be characterized by an aspect ratio (e.g., length/diameter of the fiber) of greater than about 10, or more preferably greater than about 50, and less than about 1500. Regardless of the specific type of discontinuous chopped fibers used, the material may have fibers with lengths of from about 0.01 mm to about 12 mm and a resin content of from about 40% to about 90% by weight, or more preferably from about 55% to about 70% by weight.
One suitable material may be a thermoplastic polyamide (e.g., PA6 or PA66) filled with chopped carbon fiber (i.e., a carbon-filled polyamide). Other resins may include certain polyimides, polyamide-imides, polyetheretherketones (PEEK), polycarbonates, engineering polyurethanes, and/or other similar materials.
By replacing a portion of the body 14 with a comparatively lighter polymeric insert 16, either the entire weight of the club head 12 may be reduced (which may provide faster club head speeds and/or longer hitting distances), or alternatively, the ratio of discretionary weight to structural weight may be increased (i.e., for a constant club head weight). Additionally, because polymeric molding techniques are generally capable of forming more intricate and/or complex designs than traditional metal forming techniques, the use of a polymeric insert 16 may also provide greater freedom in styling the overall appearance of the club head.
Referring again to FIG. 1, the insert 16 may be affixed to the body 14 of the club head 12 using an adhesive that is selected to bond with both the metal body 14 and the polymer of the insert 16. Such an adhesive may include, for example, a two-part acrylic epoxy such as DP-810, available from the 3M Company of St. Paul, Minn. The adhesive may be disposed across a lap joint formed between the insert 16 and an outer bond surface 34 of the body 14 when assembled. In one configuration, the outer bond surface 34 may be at least partially recessed into the body 14 such that when the insert 16 is installed, an outer surface 36 of the insert 16 may either be substantially flush with an outer surface 38 of the sole 22, or else may be partially recessed relative to the outer surface 38 of the sole 22.
In one configuration, the bond surface 34 of the lap joint may include a plurality of embossed spacing features 40 disposed in a spaced arrangement across the surface 34. The spacing features 40 may include one or more bumps or ridges that are provided to ensure a uniform, minimum adhesive thickness between the body 14 and the insert 16. In one configuration, each of the plurality of spacing features 40 may protrude above the bond surface 34 by about 0.05 mm to about 0.50 mm.
While most adhesives will readily bond to metals, typical bond strengths to polymers are comparatively lower. To improve the adhesive bonding with the polymer of the insert 16, the insert 16 may be pre-treated prior to assembly. In one configuration, such a pre-treatment may include a corona discharge or plasma discharge surface treatment, which may increase the surface energy of the polymer. In other embodiments, chemical adhesion promoters and/or mechanical abrasion may alternatively be used to increase the bond strength with the polymer.
While providing an opening 32 in the body 14 serves to reduce the weight of the club head 12, it also can negatively affect the structural integrity and/or durability of the club head 12 if not properly reinforced. Any flexure of the body 14 around the opening 32 may, for example, negatively affect the bond strength of the adhesive used to secure the insert 16 and/or the performance and durability of the club head 12. To replace some or all of the lost structural rigidity, one or more support struts or ribs 50 may extend across the opening 32 to stiffen the body structure.
FIG. 3 schematically illustrates a club head body 14 with a single support strut/rib 50 extending across the opening 32. In this configuration, the strut 50 may be generally oriented along a longitudinal axis 52 that intersects the face 20 of the club head 12 (more clearly illustrated in FIG. 5). As used herein, when an axis “intersects” the face, it should be understood that the axis is not constrained to exist only on the described component, but instead extends linearly beyond the component as well.
FIG. 4 provides a face-view of the club head 12 provided in FIG. 3, with a bisecting strut-section taken along line 5-5, which is separately illustrated as FIG. 5. As shown in FIGS. 3-5, the strut 50 may be generally planar in nature, with the majority of the strut 50 being centered about and/or disposed within a common stiffening plane 51. In the illustrated embodiment, the stiffening plane is coincident with section 5-5 shown in FIG. 4. In one configuration, the stiffening plane 51 (and strut 50) may be about perpendicular to the wall of the club head 12 from which the strut/rib 50 extends. In other embodiments, the stiffening plane 51 may be disposed at an angle to the wall, or, for example, within 45 degrees of perpendicular. Said another way, the stiffening plane 51 may form an angle of from about 45 degrees to about 135 degrees with the wall from which the strut 50 extends. As shown in FIG. 4, in some configurations, the strut 50 may be offset relative to a face center 54, and may further be angled relative to a vertical plane (i.e., a plane that is perpendicular to the ground plane 56) extending through the face center 54 (i.e. face center as determined using Unites States Golf Association (USGA) standard measuring procedures and methods). In one configuration, the offset may be from about 0 mm to about 20 mm. Additionally, the angle formed between the strut 50 and the vertical plane may be from about 0 degrees to about 10 degrees.
Referring to FIG. 5, in one configuration, the strut 50 extends from an inner surface 62 of the body 14 on opposing sides of the opening 32. To provide the maximum stiffening and durability to the club head 12, the strut 50 should be integrally attached to the wall, such as by being welded in place, molded/comolded in place, or cast in place. In one configuration the strut 50 may be formed from a metal sheet having a uniform thickness 64 of from about 0.5 mm to about 1.5 mm (shown in FIG. 3), and a height 66 of from about 4 mm to about 25 mm. As generally shown in FIG. 5, while the strut 50 may be secured to the inner surface 62 of the sole 22 at a first end 67, in one embodiment it may be secured to the crown 26 at the opposing end 68 or at various places along its length.
In addition to stiffening the body structure, the support strut 50 may also assist in securing the insert 16 to the body 14. As shown in FIGS. 6-8, one embodiment of the insert 16 may include two, protruding walls 70, 72 that are spaced apart from each other to define a slot 71. The slot 71 is configured or dimensioned to receive a portion of the strut 50 when the two portions of the club head 12 are assembled/brought into close contact. The slot 71 may be further configured or dimensioned so that the strut 50 may be adhered to each of the walls 70, 72 once it is positioned within the slot 71.
In the illustrated embodiment, the slot 71 may have a uniform width of, for example, from about 1.0 mm to about 2.0 mm. When the insert 16 is assembled with the body 14 and is in close contact with the bond surface 34, the protruding walls 70, 72 extend on opposing sides of the strut 50 and generally parallel to the stiffening plane 51. The inward-facing surfaces of these walls 70, 72 may be adhered to the strut 50 using, for example, the same adhesive that is used to secure the insert 16 to the outer bond surface 34. By adhering the insert 16 to both the strut 50 and the outer bond surface 34 of the body 14, the total surface area that is bonded between the insert 16 and the body 14 may be increased by more than about 30% above the outer bond surface 34, alone. Additionally, securing the insert 16 in this manner utilizes both the sheer strength of the adhesive (via the strut 50) and the tensile/peel strength of the adhesive (via the bond surface 34).
As mentioned above, one or more weights 18 may be selectively coupled with the body 14 and/or insert 16 to provide a user with an ability to alter the stock performance and weight distribution of the club head 12. As generally shown in FIG. 1, in one configuration, the weight 18 may generally include an elongate member 74 that may be removably secured within the golf club head 12. The weight 18 may be received and selectively retained within a bore 76 provided within the insert 16. To properly reinforce the bore 76, particularly if the insert 16 is formed from a polymeric material, the slot 71 may be positioned such that the stiffening plane (defined by the strut 50) bisects the bore and/or weight 18. In a more preferred design, the stiffening plane would be oriented such that the plane intersects the center of gravity 78 of the weight, and any resultant impact force vectors would be within/parallel to the stiffening plane 51. Such a design may minimize any moments that may be applied through the polymer or lap joint.
While FIGS. 1-8 illustrate a first embodiment of how the present technology may be employed, FIGS. 9-10 schematically illustrate two alternate configurations. In each embodiment (including the embodiment shown in FIGS. 1-8), the golf club head 12 includes a first portion 100 joined to a second portion 102 to at least partially define an interior volume 104 of the club head 12.
The first portion 100 includes a wall 106 that defines an outer boundary of the volume 104 and a support rib or strut (generally at 108) that extends from the wall 106 to operatively stiffen the first portion 100.
The second portion 102 defines a slot 71 that receives a portion of the support rib 108, where the portion of the support rib 108 is then adhered within the slot 71 to aid in joining the first portion 100 to the second portion 102.
In an embodiment, the first portion 100 a may be a forward section 120 of the golf club head 12 that includes a face 20 and a hosel 24. The second portion 102 b may then be a rear, body section 122 of the club head 12 that includes the majority of the crown 26 and sole 22. In the illustrated embodiment, the forward section 120 may, for example, be formed from a metallic alloy, while the rear, body section 122 may be formed from a filled or unfilled polymeric material similar to the insert 16 described above.
As shown in FIG. 10, the forward section 120 may include a support rib/strut 108 a that extends from a sidewall 124 of the forward section 120 in a generally perpendicular manner. The rear, body section 122 of the club head 12 may then include a slot 71 a that is adapted to receive the support rib 108 a when the forward section 120 is joined with the rear, body section 122. When assembled, the support rib/strut 108 a is adhered within the slot 71 a to facilitate a more robust joint between the forward section 120 and the rear, body section 122.
In this specific embodiment, the support rib/strut 108 a may be operative to stiffen a portion of the sidewall to alter the impact response of the face 20. Additionally, the rib 108 a may facilitate an impact force transfer between a weight 126 and the sidewall 124 or face 20.
In another embodiment, also illustrated by FIGS. 9-10, the first portion 100 b and second portion 102 b may cooperate to define the rear, body section 122. In this configuration, both portions 100 b, 102 b may be formed from the same polymeric material, which may be a filled or unfilled polymeric material similar to the material described above with respect to the insert 16.
As shown, a support rib 108 b may extend from the crown 26, where it is operative to stiffen and support the crown 26. Due to the crown's polymeric construction, it may be inherently less rigid (absent any buttressing) than a comparable metal crown. Therefore, the reinforcement may be particularly beneficial to achieve a sufficiently thin wall and the desirable weight savings. The second portion 102 b may include a slot 71 b that is adapted to receive a portion of the support rib 108 b, which may be adhered within the slot 71 b to aid in joining the two halves of the rear section 122.
In each of the embodiments provided in FIGS. 9-10, a lap joint 128 a, 128 b may be provided between the first portion 100 a, 100 b and the respectively attached portion 102 a, 102 b. Adhesive may be provided across the lap joint to further adhere the first portion 100 a, 100 b to the respective second portion 102 a, 102 b. In each embodiment, the stiffening plane that contains a respective support rib 108 may intersect the respective lap joint 128 a, 128 b at an angle of from about 45 degrees to about 135 degrees.
While various embodiments have been described, the description is intended to be exemplary, rather than limiting and it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible. For example, while not explicitly shown, the rib/slot arrangements of FIGS. 1-10 may be reversed without departing from the spirit of the present teachings. Likewise, in some embodiments, the support rib 108 may be provided outside of the internal volume 104. Accordingly, the invention is not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents. Also, various modifications and changes may be made within the scope of the attached claims.
“A,” “an,” “the,” “at least one,” and “one or more” are used interchangeably to indicate that at least one of the item is present; a plurality of such items may be present unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. All numerical values of parameters (e.g., of quantities or conditions) in this specification, including the appended claims, are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about” whether or not “about” actually appears before the numerical value. “About” indicates that the stated numerical value allows some slight imprecision (with some approach to exactness in the value; about or reasonably close to the value; nearly). If the imprecision provided by “about” is not otherwise understood in the art with this ordinary meaning, then “about” as used herein indicates at least variations that may arise from ordinary methods of measuring and using such parameters. In addition, disclosure of ranges includes disclosure of all values and further divided ranges within the entire range. Each value within a range and the endpoints of a range are hereby all disclosed as separate embodiment. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “including,” and “having,” are inclusive and therefore specify the presence of stated items, but do not preclude the presence of other items. As used in this specification, the term “or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the listed items. When the terms first, second, third, etc. are used to differentiate various items from each other, these designations are merely for convenience and do not limit the items.

Claims

1. A golf club comprising:

a golf club head having a sole, a crown, a face, and an internal wall that defines a bore having both an open end and a closed end;

an elongate member including a body portion and a protrusion extending radially outward from the body portion, wherein:

the elongate member is insertable within the open end of the bore and rotatable within the bore between a first angular position and a second angular position that are between about 90 degrees and about 180 degrees apart,

the elongate member is freely removable from the bore when in the first angular position and is restrained from being withdrawn from the bore when in the second angular position, and

a compliant stop extending radially inward into the bore from the internal wall, wherein the compliant stop is positioned such that the protrusion contacts the compliant stop as the elongate member is rotated between the first angular position and the second angular position, and wherein the contact between the compliant stop and the protrusion inhibits rotational motion of the elongate member between the first and second angular positions only up to a torque threshold that is within the range of from about 10 inch-pounds to about 40 inch-pounds.

2. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein at least one of the protrusion and the compliant stop elastically deforms to permit the rotation of the elongate member between the first and second angular positions in response to an applied torque above the torque threshold.

3. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the internal wall comprises a polymer, and

wherein the internal wall elastically deforms to permit the rotation of the elongate member between the first and second angular positions in response to an applied torque above the torque threshold.

4. The golf club of claim 1, further comprising a non-compliant stop extending radially inward from the internal wall, wherein:

the non-compliant stop is disposed on an opposite side of the protrusion from the compliant stop when the elongate member is in the second angular position, and

the non-compliant stop inhibits rotation of the elongate member up to a torque, applied to the elongate member, of at least 40 inch-pounds.

5. The golf club of claim 4, wherein the non-compliant stop extends radially inward from the internal wall by a greater distance than the compliant stop.

6. The golf club of claim 1, further comprising:

an elastomeric dampening member disposed at the closed end of the bore, wherein the dampening member applies an elastic biasing force to the elongate member when the elongate member is in the second angular position; and

a cinching ramp extending radially inward from the internal wall and positioned such that the protrusion contacts the cinching ramp as the elongate member is rotated between the first angular position and the second angular position; and

wherein the contact between the protrusion and the cinching ramp urges the elongate member against the dampening member.

7. The golf club of claim 6, wherein the dampening member has a hardness, measured on the Shore A scale, of from about 70 A to about 90 A.

8. The golf club head of claim 1, further comprising a protrusion extending radially inward from the internal wall and positioned such that the protrusion provides an interference that restrains the elongate member from being withdrawn from the bore when in the second angular position.

9. The golf club head of claim 8, wherein the protrusion extending radially inward from the internal wall is a cinching ramp that is positioned such that the protrusion of the elongate member contacts the cinching ramp as the elongate member is rotated between the first angular position and the second angular position; and

wherein the contact between the protrusion of the elongate member and the cinching ramp urges the elongate member further into the bore

10. The golf club of claim 1, wherein the elongate member includes a recess configured to receive a tool;

wherein the tool can apply a torque to the elongate member, via the recess, sufficient to transition the elongate member between the first angular position and the second angular position.

11. The golf club of claim 1, wherein the golf club head includes a first portion formed from metal, and a second portion formed from a material comprising a polymer;

wherein the first portion and second portion are joined to at least partially define a closed volume therebetween; and

wherein the second portion includes the internal wall that defines the bore.

12. The golf club of claim 11, wherein the second portion defines at least a portion of the sole

13. The golf club of claim 1, wherein the bore defines a longitudinal axis between the open end and the closed end, and wherein the longitudinal axis intersects the face.

14. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the torque threshold for transitioning from the first angular position to the second angular position is different from the torque threshold for transitioning from the second angular position to the first angular position.

15. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the bore defines a longitudinal axis between the open end and the closed end; and

wherein the elongate member is freely translatable within the bore, along the longitudinal axis when in the first angular position.

16. A golf club comprising:

a golf club head having a sole, a crown, and a face, and a wall that defines a bore having both an open end and a closed end;

an elastomeric dampening member disposed within the bore at the closed end;

a cinching ramp extending from the wall into the bore;

an elongate member including a body portion and a protrusion extending radially outward from the body portion;

wherein the elongate member is slidably insertable within the open end of the bore and rotatable within the bore between a first angular position and a second angular position, wherein the elongate member is configured to be freely withdrawn from the bore when in the first angular position and is restrained from being withdrawn from the bore via contact between the protrusion and the cinching ramp when in the second angular position, and wherein the elongate member can transition from the first angular position to the second angular position via a rotation of from about 90 degrees to about 180 degrees;

wherein the dampening member and cinching ramp cooperate to apply an elastic biasing force to the elongate member when the elongate member is in the second angular position.

17. The golf club of claim 16, wherein the wall is formed from a polymeric material;

the golf club further comprising a compliant stop extending from the wall into the bore, wherein the compliant stop inhibits rotational motion of the elongate member between the first and second angular positions only up to a torque threshold that is within the range of from about 10 inch-pounds to about 40 inch-pounds; and

wherein the compliant stop is positioned such that it is at least partially disposed in a path of the protrusion as the elongate member is rotated between the first angular position and the second angular position; and

wherein at least one of the protrusion, the compliant stop, and the wall elastically deforms to permit the rotation of the elongate member in response to an applied torque above the torque threshold.

18. The golf club head of claim 16, wherein the bore defines a longitudinal axis between the open end and the closed end; and

19. The golf club head of claim 18, wherein the longitudinal axis intersects the face.

20. The golf club head of claim 16, wherein the wall is formed from a polymeric material.