+

US20120315092A1 - Tidewater control system - Google Patents

Tidewater control system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20120315092A1
US20120315092A1 US13/492,070 US201213492070A US2012315092A1 US 20120315092 A1 US20120315092 A1 US 20120315092A1 US 201213492070 A US201213492070 A US 201213492070A US 2012315092 A1 US2012315092 A1 US 2012315092A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
water
marine vessel
river
canal
flow
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/492,070
Inventor
Angelo Vincent Quaglino, JR.
Angelo Vincent Quaglino, Iii
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US13/492,070 priority Critical patent/US20120315092A1/en
Publication of US20120315092A1 publication Critical patent/US20120315092A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02BHYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
    • E02B3/00Engineering works in connection with control or use of streams, rivers, coasts, or other marine sites; Sealings or joints for engineering works in general
    • E02B3/02Stream regulation, e.g. breaking up subaqueous rock, cleaning the beds of waterways, directing the water flow

Definitions

  • the invention relates to systems for controlling the flow of water in rivers, lakes and manmade channels in order to lower water or tide levels in flooding or other adverse situations.
  • a river is flowing into another body of water such as an ocean, or a drainage canal may flow into a lake.
  • Prime examples are the Mississippi River flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, and drainage canals in the City of New La flowing into Lake Ponchartrain.
  • the draining river or canal must overcome the existing tidewater or water level of the receiving body for water to drain.
  • Marine vessels are normally powered to be propelled in the water but, if the vessel is retarded or firmly anchored and pointed against the flow of a river and given propulsive power, the propellers will move water in the direction of the river flow, thereby serving as an adjunct or assist to the river flow.
  • a multiplicity of highly powered commercial vessels such as commonly used in the offshore industries, a significant power assist could be provided to river flow.
  • FIG. 1 depicts a cross sectional view at the mouth of a river with a marine vessel deployed as part of the inventive system and method.
  • FIG. 2 depicts a plan view of the inventive system at the mouth of a river and in tributary canals.
  • FIG. 3 is a plan view of the 17 th Street Canal in New La during Hurricane Katrina.
  • FIG. 4 is a plan view of the same area shown in FIG. 3 , but with the inventive system and method deployed to prevent flooding through the broken flood wall.
  • FIG. 1 the inventive tidewater control system 1 is depicted as deployed at the mouth 25 of a river 2 such as the Mississippi River.
  • a river 2 such as the Mississippi River.
  • the water or tide is moving at about 3 to 7 mph.
  • the tide reaches the mouth of the River it slows to about 1 to 2 mph because of the width of the mouth. Because of this, sand and sediment sink and form sand bars that further slow the flow of water.
  • At least one powered marine vessel 4 would be anchored in the Gulf of Mexico 3 beyond a sand bar 11 at the mouth 25 of the river 2 with an anchor 9 and mooring line 8 and pointed against the river flow direction 10 .
  • the engines 12 of the marine vessel 4 is powered to turn the propellers 6 , water as indicated by prop wash 7 will be forced back into the Gulf 3 to lower the tide level 5 in the river 2 and reduce the size of the sand bar 11 .
  • a multiplicity of vessels, each with one or more engines 12 and propellers 6 could be engaged in the inventive system 1 .
  • FIG. 2 depicts a plan view of inventive tidewater control system 1 deployed at the mouth 25 of a river 2 with a fleet or multiplicity of powered marine vessels 4 anchored with mooring lines 8 and anchors 9 beyond a sand bar 11 and pointed against the river flow direction 10 .
  • inventive tidewater control system 1 deployed at the mouth 25 of a river 2 with a fleet or multiplicity of powered marine vessels 4 anchored with mooring lines 8 and anchors 9 beyond a sand bar 11 and pointed against the river flow direction 10 .
  • FIG. 1 when the engines 12 of the marine vessels 4 are powered to turn the propellers 6 , water as indicated by prop wash 7 will be forced back into the Gulf 3 to lower the tide level 5 in the river 2 and reduce the size of the sand bar 11 .
  • FIG. 2 also depicts the inventive system 1 deployed in a tributary canal 14 that has a sand bar 11 near the entrance of the tributary canal 14 to the river 2 .
  • the marine vessel 4 would be anchored in the tributary canal 14 pointed against the canal water flow 10 .
  • water as shown by the prop wash 7 will be forced back the canal 14 to lower the tide level 5 in the river 2 and reduce the size of the sand bar 11 .
  • FIG. 3 depicts a plan view of the failure of the flood walls 21 at the 17 th Street Canal 19 in New Louisiana during Hurricane Katrina.
  • a breach 23 in the floodwall 21 occurred on the Louisiana Parish side of the Canal 19 , opposite the Jefferson Parish side. Also shown is a bridge 17 and road 18 .
  • the breach 23 allowed floodwaters 24 to wash out the mud and clay levee 22 , completely flooding and destroying residences along the side of the Canal 19 .
  • the Canal 19 empties into Lake Ponchartrain 15 .
  • the canal water level 20 was plus 15 feet as was the lake water level 16 . These water levels were well above the elevation of the breach 23 , so the flood water 21 continued to flood New La.
  • FIG. 4 has the same plan view as shown in FIG. 3 , but with the inventive tidewater control system deployed at the mouth of the canal 19 .
  • marine vessels 4 are anchored and pointed into the canal 19 .
  • the flood water will be pushed back into the Lake 15 , lowering the canal water level 20 to plus 10 feet below the level of the breach 23 .
  • This example is offered to illustrate the benefits of the inventive system and method that can be deployed rapidly in emergency situations.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Revetment (AREA)

Abstract

A system and method for assisting the flow of water in rivers, streams and tributaries using the propulsive power of anchored marine vessels to move water in the direction of flow to aid flow and lower water levels in rivers, streams and tributaries.

Description

  • This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional application Ser. No. 61/495216 (“the '216 application”) filed Jun. 9, 2011. The '216 application is incorporated herein by reference.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates to systems for controlling the flow of water in rivers, lakes and manmade channels in order to lower water or tide levels in flooding or other adverse situations.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • As evidenced by recent events, severe flooding is a constant problem for those areas in the nation near rivers, streams, tributaries and other bodies of water, both natural and manmade. A primary example is the flooding caused by the Mississippi River and its tributaries that drain most of the mid United States. The Mississippi River normally flows at approximately 700,000 to 200,000 cubic feet of water per second (cfs). When snow and rainfall levels in the North are abnormally high, the Mississippi is forced to drain more water than it can safely handle thereby causing higher water levels with overtopping of the levee protection system. In addition this higher river volume increases the water flow rate threatening the structure of the levees. Other natural phenomenon such as the development of sand bars at the mouth of a river cause the river speed to drastically drop, further limiting the ability of the river to move the enormous volume of water draining into it.
  • It is an object of the present invention to provide a system or method that will assist the flow of water in rivers, streams, tributaries and other bodies of water, both natural and manmade to lower tide or water levels in order to prevent flooding of homes and properties. Typically, a river is flowing into another body of water such as an ocean, or a drainage canal may flow into a lake. Prime examples are the Mississippi River flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, and drainage canals in the City of New Orleans flowing into Lake Ponchartrain. The draining river or canal must overcome the existing tidewater or water level of the receiving body for water to drain. By anchoring a crew boat or large vessel or a fleet of such vessels at the mouth of the Mississippi River and pointed into the flow of the River, with the engines running, the higher tide will be pushed back into the Gulf, lowering the River level and aiding flow.
  • It is an object of this invention to use the propulsive power of marine vessels to move water in the direction of drainage to assist in the natural gravity flow of a river or a canal. Marine vessels are normally powered to be propelled in the water but, if the vessel is retarded or firmly anchored and pointed against the flow of a river and given propulsive power, the propellers will move water in the direction of the river flow, thereby serving as an adjunct or assist to the river flow. By employing a multiplicity of highly powered commercial vessels such as commonly used in the offshore industries, a significant power assist could be provided to river flow.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 depicts a cross sectional view at the mouth of a river with a marine vessel deployed as part of the inventive system and method.
  • FIG. 2 depicts a plan view of the inventive system at the mouth of a river and in tributary canals.
  • FIG. 3 is a plan view of the 17th Street Canal in New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina.
  • FIG. 4 is a plan view of the same area shown in FIG. 3, but with the inventive system and method deployed to prevent flooding through the broken flood wall.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • In FIG. 1 the inventive tidewater control system 1 is depicted as deployed at the mouth 25 of a river 2 such as the Mississippi River. As the water flows down the Mississippi River towards the Gulf of Mexico, around the City of New Orleans the water or tide is moving at about 3 to 7 mph. When the tide reaches the mouth of the River it slows to about 1 to 2 mph because of the width of the mouth. Because of this, sand and sediment sink and form sand bars that further slow the flow of water.
  • As shown in FIG. 1, at least one powered marine vessel 4 would be anchored in the Gulf of Mexico 3 beyond a sand bar 11 at the mouth 25 of the river 2 with an anchor 9 and mooring line 8 and pointed against the river flow direction 10. When the engines 12 of the marine vessel 4 is powered to turn the propellers 6, water as indicated by prop wash 7 will be forced back into the Gulf 3 to lower the tide level 5 in the river 2 and reduce the size of the sand bar 11. It is understood that, while only one vessel 4 is depicted in FIG. 1, a multiplicity of vessels, each with one or more engines 12 and propellers 6, could be engaged in the inventive system 1.
  • FIG. 2 depicts a plan view of inventive tidewater control system 1 deployed at the mouth 25 of a river 2 with a fleet or multiplicity of powered marine vessels 4 anchored with mooring lines 8 and anchors 9 beyond a sand bar 11 and pointed against the river flow direction 10. As shown in FIG. 1, when the engines 12 of the marine vessels 4 are powered to turn the propellers 6, water as indicated by prop wash 7 will be forced back into the Gulf 3 to lower the tide level 5 in the river 2 and reduce the size of the sand bar 11.
  • FIG. 2 also depicts the inventive system 1 deployed in a tributary canal 14 that has a sand bar 11 near the entrance of the tributary canal 14 to the river 2. The marine vessel 4 would be anchored in the tributary canal 14 pointed against the canal water flow 10. By powering the vessel 4 through the engines 12 and propellers 6, water as shown by the prop wash 7 will be forced back the canal 14 to lower the tide level 5 in the river 2 and reduce the size of the sand bar 11.
  • FIG. 3 depicts a plan view of the failure of the flood walls 21 at the 17th Street Canal 19 in New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina. A breach 23 in the floodwall 21 occurred on the Orleans Parish side of the Canal 19, opposite the Jefferson Parish side. Also shown is a bridge 17 and road 18. The breach 23 allowed floodwaters 24 to wash out the mud and clay levee 22, completely flooding and destroying residences along the side of the Canal 19. The Canal 19 empties into Lake Ponchartrain 15. At the time of this flooding the canal water level 20 was plus 15 feet as was the lake water level 16. These water levels were well above the elevation of the breach 23, so the flood water 21 continued to flood New Orleans.
  • FIG. 4 has the same plan view as shown in FIG. 3, but with the inventive tidewater control system deployed at the mouth of the canal 19. As shown, marine vessels 4 are anchored and pointed into the canal 19. By engaging the engines 12 and propellers 6, the flood water will be pushed back into the Lake 15, lowering the canal water level 20 to plus 10 feet below the level of the breach 23. This example is offered to illustrate the benefits of the inventive system and method that can be deployed rapidly in emergency situations.

Claims (5)

1. A method for assisting the natural gravity flow of a river or canal into an ocean or lake comprising the steps of:
providing at least one powered marine vessel with at least one propeller;
pointing the marine vessel in a direction opposite the natural gravity flow of a river or canal;
powering the propellers of the marine vessel
anchoring the marine vessel to prevent forward motion of the marine vessel in a direction opposite the natural gravity flow of a river or canal; and
moving water with the propeller in the same direction as the natural gravity flow of a river or canal, thereby increasing the flow.
2. The method of claim 1 where the step of anchoring the marine vessel to prevent forward motion of the marine vessel in a direction opposite the natural gravity flow of a river or canal, further includes anchoring the marine vessel at the mouth of a river or canal.
3. The method of claim 3 where the step of anchoring the marine vessel at the mouth of a river or canal further includes anchoring the marine vessel beyond a sandbar at the mouth of a river or canal to reduce the size of the sandbar.
4. A method for lowering the water level of a body of water flowing into a receiving body of water comprising the steps of:
providing at least one powered marine vessel with at least one propeller;
pointing the marine vessel into the point of flow from the body of water;
powering the propellers of the marine vessel
anchoring the marine vessel to prevent forward motion of the marine vessel into the body of water flowing into a receiving body of water; and
moving water with the propeller in the same direction as the flow of water into the receiving body of water, thereby lowering the water level.
5. The method of claim 4 where the step of anchoring the marine vessel to prevent forward motion of the marine vessel into the body of water further includes anchoring the marine vessel where the body of water flows into the receiving body of water.
US13/492,070 2011-06-09 2012-06-08 Tidewater control system Abandoned US20120315092A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/492,070 US20120315092A1 (en) 2011-06-09 2012-06-08 Tidewater control system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201161495216P 2011-06-09 2011-06-09
US13/492,070 US20120315092A1 (en) 2011-06-09 2012-06-08 Tidewater control system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20120315092A1 true US20120315092A1 (en) 2012-12-13

Family

ID=47293328

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/492,070 Abandoned US20120315092A1 (en) 2011-06-09 2012-06-08 Tidewater control system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20120315092A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8985899B2 (en) * 2012-11-27 2015-03-24 William Charles McIntyre System and method of water flow quantity equalization
US20210262185A1 (en) * 2019-10-07 2021-08-26 Rsa Protective Technologies, Llc Surface water management system including weir wall and detention pond

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5673449A (en) * 1993-05-26 1997-10-07 Vattenfall Utveckling Ab Flow compensation device for bridge pillars
US6102619A (en) * 1997-06-10 2000-08-15 Current Solutions, L.L.C. Flow inducer fish guide and method of using same
US20020168230A1 (en) * 2001-03-26 2002-11-14 Coe Thomas J. Flow diverter system and method
US6712555B1 (en) * 1998-07-20 2004-03-30 Current Solutions, L.L.C. Flow inducer fish guide and method of using same
US6729800B2 (en) * 2001-10-12 2004-05-04 Burns, Ii Gordon Charles Flow velocity enhancement system
US7419334B2 (en) * 2001-08-22 2008-09-02 Benton Frederick Baugh Thruster flood control method

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5673449A (en) * 1993-05-26 1997-10-07 Vattenfall Utveckling Ab Flow compensation device for bridge pillars
US6102619A (en) * 1997-06-10 2000-08-15 Current Solutions, L.L.C. Flow inducer fish guide and method of using same
US6712555B1 (en) * 1998-07-20 2004-03-30 Current Solutions, L.L.C. Flow inducer fish guide and method of using same
US20020168230A1 (en) * 2001-03-26 2002-11-14 Coe Thomas J. Flow diverter system and method
US7419334B2 (en) * 2001-08-22 2008-09-02 Benton Frederick Baugh Thruster flood control method
US6729800B2 (en) * 2001-10-12 2004-05-04 Burns, Ii Gordon Charles Flow velocity enhancement system

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8985899B2 (en) * 2012-11-27 2015-03-24 William Charles McIntyre System and method of water flow quantity equalization
US20210262185A1 (en) * 2019-10-07 2021-08-26 Rsa Protective Technologies, Llc Surface water management system including weir wall and detention pond
US11898317B2 (en) * 2019-10-07 2024-02-13 Rsa Protective Technologies, Llc Surface water management system including weir wall and detention pond

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2777052C (en) Wave suppressor and sediment collection system
CN101736717B (en) Method for dredging silt and harnessing river
US20120315092A1 (en) Tidewater control system
US6283673B1 (en) Method of protecting coastal land from rise of surface of the sea
JPS61294009A (en) Protective apparatus wherein energy disipating element is mounted on bank
Herron Jr Case history of Mission Bay Inlet, San Diego, California
Wright Morphodynamics of a wave-dominated river mouth
US5741086A (en) Integrated, multiphase, energy-dissipating environmental system
JP2006249914A (en) Tidal wave breakwater
KR100657180B1 (en) Coastal soil erosion prevention structures
Hall et al. Shoreline response to hurricane Hugo
JPS63315717A (en) Wave dissipation device
JP3028437B2 (en) Beach nourishment method and equipment for sandy beach
Charlier et al. Beach protection and restoration Part II: a perspective of “soft” methods
Burrows et al. Novel boom/skirt systems for improvement of water quality in estuarial impoundments subject to saline influx
JP2005002737A (en) Sand depositing construction method in seashore
DIBAJNIA NEARSHORE REEF DESIGN TO CONTROL SHORELINE EROSION AT GIBRALTAR POINT
Williams Navigation Locks for Coastal Saline Lake Developments
Walton Jr St. Lucie Inlet Glossary Of Inlets Report# 1
CA2271580A1 (en) The ryan wave reversing break wall
Beer Water policy: 450 gigalitres upwater not feasible on Murray-Darling
Davis USA--Mississippi and Alabama
NORTON et al. MAINTAINING THE INTEGRITY OF AN ESTUARY: EAST SAND ISLAND BREACH PREVENTION
Cappietti et al. Rehabilitation of highly protected beaches by using environment-friendly structures
US3841103A (en) Current stabilizing means for island airport foundations

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载