US20110166605A1 - Posterior dynamic stabilization of spine - Google Patents
Posterior dynamic stabilization of spine Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20110166605A1 US20110166605A1 US13/048,496 US201113048496A US2011166605A1 US 20110166605 A1 US20110166605 A1 US 20110166605A1 US 201113048496 A US201113048496 A US 201113048496A US 2011166605 A1 US2011166605 A1 US 2011166605A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- superior
- inferior
- spinous processes
- distraction
- anchoring
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 title abstract description 3
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 title abstract description 3
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 145
- 238000004873 anchoring Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 119
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 110
- 239000007943 implant Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 239000013536 elastomeric material Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000000087 stabilizing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 239000003381 stabilizer Substances 0.000 description 52
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 11
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000002513 implantation Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 8
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000000284 resting effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 208000007623 Lordosis Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 210000000988 bone and bone Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 206010023509 Kyphosis Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920001971 elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 210000003041 ligament Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013013 elastic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000806 elastomer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002163 immunogen Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 201000008482 osteoarthritis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001575 pathological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012858 resilient material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000005060 rubber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000006850 spacer group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 239000004753 textile Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003313 weakening effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws or setting implements
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers, e.g. stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
- A61B17/7062—Devices acting on, attached to, or simulating the effect of, vertebral processes, vertebral facets or ribs ; Tools for such devices
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws or setting implements
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers, e.g. stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
- A61B17/7062—Devices acting on, attached to, or simulating the effect of, vertebral processes, vertebral facets or ribs ; Tools for such devices
- A61B17/7065—Devices with changeable shape, e.g. collapsible or having retractable arms to aid implantation; Tools therefor
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws or setting implements
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers, e.g. stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
- A61B17/7062—Devices acting on, attached to, or simulating the effect of, vertebral processes, vertebral facets or ribs ; Tools for such devices
- A61B17/707—Devices acting on, or attached to, a transverse process or rib; Tools therefor
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws or setting implements
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers, e.g. stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
- A61B17/7053—Spinal positioners or stabilisers, e.g. stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant with parts attached to bones or to each other by flexible wires, straps, sutures or cables
Definitions
- the present invention relates to interspinous vertebral implants and methods for using the same for dynamic stabilization of the spine.
- Damage to an intervertebral disk typically results in abnormal play of the vertebrae contiguous to this disk. This play subjects the posterior articular processes to considerable stresses, generating very painful wear and tear of these processes and general instability of the spinal column. Such instability can also result from an operation performed on a herniated intervertebral disk, which entails access to the disk, thereby weakening the ligament system of the articulation, or can result from certain cases of arthrosis which also subjects the posterior articulations to considerable and painful stresses.
- interspinous stabilizers are designed to be inserted between the spinous processes.
- one such stabilizer comprises an interspinous bearing cushion which is fixed to the spinal column by a textile ligament which surrounds the processes.
- One of the major disadvantages of the bearing cushion is being relatively rigid and holding the vertebrae in a specific position, thereby creating discomfort for the patient.
- the bearing cushion tends to wear under the influence of repeated stresses to which it is subjected.
- interspinous stabilizers have anchoring members, which are adapted to be attached to processes, directly perpendicular to a spring body that provides stability during extension. These interspinous stabilizers, while helpful in limiting the range of spinal motion during extension, lack sufficient support in flexion and thus may create a flat back or kyphotic positioning in the spine. Moreover, these interspinous stabilizers may produce an undesirable load environment at adjacent spine levels.
- interspinous stabilizers that can provide stability during both flexion and extension.
- methods of the present invention provide methods and devices for dynamically stabilizing adjacent vertebral bodies.
- methods of the present invention include inserting a resiliently compressible body between adjacent superior and inferior spinous processes, where the resiliently compressible body contacts the respective surfaces of the spinous processes thereby providing a distraction between the superior and inferior spinous processes and affixing an anchoring member to the superior and inferior spinous processes relatively posterior to the resiliently compressible body thereby providing a rotational moment which reduces the amount of compressive force in the anterior portion of the vertebral body.
- an interspinous vertebral implant that includes a distracting member comprising a compressible body adapted for positioning between adjacent superior and inferior spinous processes and an anchoring member that is capable of applying compressive force, wherein said anchoring member is capable of being anchored to the superior spinous process and the inferior spinous process.
- the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention comprises a resiliently compressible body that is adapted to be inserted between adjacent superior and inferior spinous processes. In this manner, the resiliently compressible body contacts the respective surfaces of the spinous processes thereby providing a distraction between the superior and inferior spinous processes.
- the interspinous stabilizers also comprise an anchoring member that can be used to affix the stabilizers to the superior and inferior spinous processes relatively posterior to the resiliently compressible body. Typically, the anchoring member also provides a compressive force to the spinous processes.
- the combination of the distraction and compressive forces results in creation of a rotational moment that is believed to reduce the amount of compressive force in the anterior portion of the vertebral body, in particular on the intervertebral disk.
- the interspinous stabilizers of the present invention reduce the amount of compressive force on the intervertebral disk thereby providing a significant relief to a patient.
- FIG. 1A is a side view of one embodiment of the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention following implantation
- FIG. 1B is a perspective view of FIG. 1A ;
- FIG. 2A is a side view of another embodiment of the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention following implantation
- FIG. 2B is a plane view of FIG. 2A in the plane A-A showing a method of anchoring the interspinous stabilizer shown in FIG. 2A ;
- FIG. 3A is a perspective view of another embodiment of the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention.
- FIG. 3B is a cross-sectional view of the interspinous stabilizer of FIG. 3A ;
- FIGS. 4A and 4B are side views of another embodiment of the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention with different anchoring member shapes;
- FIG. 5 is a side view of another embodiment of the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention following implantation
- FIG. 6 is a side view of another embodiment of the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention following implantation
- FIG. 7 is a side view of another embodiment of the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention following implantation
- FIG. 8A is a side view of another embodiment of the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention following implantation and at resting stage;
- FIG. 8B is a side view of the interspinous stabilizer of FIG. 8A at flexion;
- FIGS. 9A and 9B are two different perspective views of another embodiment of the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention.
- FIG. 9C is a side view of the interspinous stabilizer of FIGS. 9A and 9B following implantation.
- the present invention provides implantable interspinous stabilizers that provide a dynamic stability during flexion and extension and methods for using the same.
- the present invention provides methods and interspinous stabilizers that provide a distraction force between the adjacent superior and inferior spinous processes and a posterior compressive force on these spinous processes.
- compression force refers to a force that, in the absence of any counter force, will cause two spinous processes to move closer to one another.
- distraction or “distraction force” refers to a force that, in the absence of any counter force, will cause two vertebral bodies to move further apart from one another.
- Distraction of the adjacent spinous processes is provided by placing a distraction member between the adjacent superior and inferior spinous processes.
- the distraction member comprises a resiliently compressible body that can be deformed when compressed.
- resilient has the conventional meaning known to one skilled in the art, including having a characteristic of being capable of withstanding a substantial amount of external force without being permanently deformed and being able to revert back to substantially its original shape when the external force is removed.
- the interspinous stabilizers and methods of the present invention prevent or reduce the incidence of a flat back or kyphotic positioning in the spine by providing, in addition to distraction, a compressive force on the adjacent spinous processes, thereby at least partially counteracting the effect of distraction.
- a compressive force is generally applied using at least one anchoring element that is affixed to the spinous processes.
- the anchoring element is typically affixed relatively posterior to the location of the distractive member.
- the anchoring element is adapted to exert a compressive force on the superior spinous process and the inferior spinous process that, in the absence of any counter force, will result in bringing these two spinous processes closer to each other.
- Combination of the distraction member and the compressive force results in a rotational moment of vertebrae with the distraction element being the center of the rotational moment.
- rotational moment refers to the force that is exerted to the adjacent vertebrae such that a compressive force is exerted on the spinous processes of the two vertebrae and a separation force is exerted on the anterior portion of the two vertebrae, e.g., vertebral bodies.
- the term refers to restoring lordosis, i.e., force restoring the normal curvature of the spine. Without being bound by any theory, it is believed that this rotational moment exerts a separation force that, in the absence of any counter force, will cause the anterior portion of the two vertebral bodies to move further apart (or at least reduce the amount of compressive force) from one another thereby providing at least a partial relief from compression of the intervertebral disk, especially on the anterior portion of the intervertebral disk.
- the distraction element is adapted to be placed between adjacent superior and inferior spinous processes and contacting the respective surfaces of the spinous processes. Once implanted, the distraction element stabilizes and provides additional support during extension of the spine. During flexion, the compressive force of the anchoring element increases as the amount of flexion increases, thereby providing proportionally increasing counter force to the amount of flexion. Accordingly, interspinous stabilizers of the present invention provide a dynamic stability during both flexion and extension.
- the present invention generally relates to interspinous stabilizers and methods for using the same. That is, the invention relates to implants that are intended to be inserted between the spinous processes of two contiguous vertebrae.
- FIGS. 1A through 9C are provided for the purpose of merely illustrating the practice of the present invention. It should be appreciated that these Figures are presented only for illustrative purposes and do not constitute limitations on the scope of the present invention.
- the interspinous stabilizer 100 comprises a distraction element 110 and an anchoring element 120 .
- the anchoring element 120 is attached to the spinous process 10 of two adjacent vertebrae 20 near the posterior end of the spinous processes 10 .
- the two arms 124 of the anchoring element 120 extend anteriorly and posteriorly to engage the spinous processes 10 A and 10 B.
- the two anchoring element arms 124 are joined by a spring configuration 128 .
- the spring portion 128 that is connected to the anchoring element arms 124 is a coil spring configuration; however, it should be appreciated that other spring configurations known to one skilled in the art can also be used.
- the coil spring 128 is at least partially enclosed or encapsulated within a resiliently compressible body 114 to form the distraction element 110 .
- the overall shape of the distraction element 110 is not critical as long as it can be inserted between two adjacent spinous processes 10 to provide a sufficient distraction necessary to stabilize the spine.
- the overall shape of the distraction element 110 can be rectangular, oblong, oval, etc.
- the overall shape of the distraction element 110 in FIGS. 1A and 1B is cylindrical.
- the resiliently compressible body 114 can be made from any suitable material known to one skilled in the art including, but not limited to, elastomer, plastic, rubber, silicon, or a combination thereof. Typically, the resiliently compressible body is made from a material comprising an elastomeric material. It should be appreciated, however, that regardless of the material used, the outer surface of the resiliently compressible body 114 is preferably biocompatible or non-immunogenic. While not shown in any of the drawings, the resiliently compressible body 114 can alternatively comprise a spring that is at least partially enclosed or encapsulated within a non-elastomeric or an elastomeric material. In this manner, the majority of resiliency is attributable to the spring rather than the material itself.
- the force of the anchoring element arms 124 is applied to the spinous processes 10 posterior to the center of the coil spring 128 and the resiliently compressible body 114 .
- the interspinous stabilizer 100 is shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B with the anchoring element 120 attached to the spinous processes 10 through a hole 30 in the spinous processes.
- the anchoring element 120 comprises two anchoring element arms 124 each of which goes through the respective holes 30 in the spinous processes 10 and hooks to the other side of the spinous processes 10 .
- a variety of other methods such as a screw or nuts and bolts, known to one skilled in the art can also be used to affix the anchoring element 120 to the spinous processes 10 .
- the distraction element 110 comprising coil spring 128 and the resiliently compressible body 114 , provides distraction of the spinous processes 10 on the anterior portion while the anchoring element 120 through two arms 124 of the coil spring 128 is adapted to provide compressive forces (as illustrated by the arrows 50 ) on the posterior portion of the spinous processes 10 .
- compressive force applied by the anchoring element 120 creates a lever or a rotational moment while maintaining lordosis of the spine section.
- FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate one of the alternative methods for affixing the anchoring element 120 to the spinous processes 10 .
- the anchoring element arms 124 are terminated with a U-shaped end 132 .
- the U-shaped end 132 is used to hook the anchoring element arms 124 onto the spinous processes 10 .
- the U-shaped end 132 which may be malleable, can be crimped to the bone to provide a tighter linkage.
- the width of the anchoring element arms 124 can be tapered such that the width of the anchoring element arm 124 near the U-shaped end 132 is wider than the width of the anchoring element arm near the distraction element 110 .
- FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate another distraction element.
- the anchoring element 120 is similar to those described above in reference to FIGS. 2A and 2B ; however, it should be appreciated that the U-shaped end 132 is not essential and other configurations of the anchoring element 120 can be used to affix the anchoring element 120 to the spinous processes 10 .
- the distraction element comprises coupled body unit 150 that is encompassed or encapsulated within a resiliently compressible body 114 .
- the resiliently compressible body 114 is made from a material comprising an elastomeric material.
- the shape of the distraction element is not important as long as it is adapted to be placed between two adjacent spinous processes 10 , i.e., a superior and an inferior spinous process, 10 A and 10 B, respectively.
- the distraction element is cylindrical in shape.
- the coupled body unit 150 comprises a first rigid piece 154 A and a second rigid piece 154 B.
- the first rigid piece 154 A comprises a first coupling member 158 A and a first anchoring member 136 A.
- the second rigid piece 154 B comprises a second coupling member 158 B and a second anchoring member 136 B.
- Both of the first anchoring member 136 A and the second anchoring member 136 B are adapted to be affixed to the superior spinous processes 10 , at a location posterior to the distraction element 110 , e.g., the elastomeric body.
- the first coupling member 158 A and the second coupling member 158 B are adapted to rotate relative to each other.
- the coupled body unit 150 can further comprise a spring or a spring-like mechanism (not shown) within its body such that when the first coupling member 158 A and the second coupling member 158 B are rotated relative to each other, the rotation creates a rotational moment that exerts a force to bring the first rigid piece 154 A and the second rigid piece 154 B to its resting position.
- the resting position of the first rigid piece 154 A and the second rigid piece 154 B, relative to each other, can be parallel, i.e., in the same plane and direction to one another as shown in FIG. 3A or be parallel but the direction of the first rigid piece 154 A and the second rigid piece 154 B can be at an angle relative to one another.
- the degree of angle between the first rigid piece 154 A and the second rigid piece 154 B can range anywhere between 0° (parallel and in the same direction) and 90°, preferably 0° and 60°. It should be appreciated, however, that any angle necessary to affix the first rigid piece 154 A and the second rigid piece 154 B to their respective spinous processes at a resting or “natural” position of the spinous processes may be used.
- any method or device known in the art of mechanical devices or one skilled in the art can be utilized for coupling the first rigid piece 154 A and the second rigid piece 154 B.
- Suitable coupling mechanisms include, but are not limited to, a socket and a socket insert, as illustrated in FIG. 3B , and a ball and socket coupling mechanism. While FIG. 3B shows the first coupling member 158 A as a female part and the second coupling member 158 B as a male part, this configuration can be switched.
- a rotational moment is generated between the first rigid piece 154 A and the second rigid piece 154 B by using the elastomeric body (i.e., a resiliently compressible body 114 ) to generate a spring-like action.
- the elastomeric body i.e., a resiliently compressible body 114
- the elastomeric body comprises two radial slots 140 through which the first anchoring member 136 A and the second anchoring member 136 B protrude.
- the first rigid piece 154 A and the second rigid piece 154 B are parallel to one another in the same direction.
- the elastomeric body becomes twisted (not shown), thereby creating a spring-like action on the elastomeric body resulting in a generation of a rotational moment on the first rigid piece 154 A and the second rigid piece 154 B.
- the material used for the elastomeric body should be such that it is able to generate a sufficient rotational moment to be useful.
- the distraction element comprises a resiliently compressible tri-lobular shaped body 400 (i.e., triangular in shape with rounded edges thereby providing eccentric placement of arms).
- the anchoring element comprises a resiliently stretchable anchoring member 410 .
- the anchoring element is located posterior to the mid-point of body 400 .
- the resiliently stretchable anchoring member 410 is affixed or anchored to the spinous processes 10 .
- the resiliently stretchable anchoring member 410 is attached to a region that is posterior to the mid-point or the center of the tri-lobular shaped body 400 .
- the interspinous stabilizer 100 of FIGS. 4A and 4B can be constructed as a one piece unit, or it can be constructed as a two or more piece unit in which a fastener or other fastening mechanism 420 is used to attach the resiliently stretchable anchoring member 410 to the resiliently compressible tri-lobular shaped body 400 .
- the interspinous stabilizer 100 of FIGS. 4A and 4B can also include a fixation member (not shown) to attach the interspinous stabilizer 100 to a pedicle (not shown).
- Suitable fixation members are well known to one skilled in the art and include, but are not limited to, a screw, a nut and bolt, or other mechanism suitable for affixing or attaching the resiliently compressible tri-lobular body 400 and/or the resiliently stretchable anchoring member 410 to the pedicle.
- This fixation member (not shown) can be used in place of or in addition to a fastener 420 to attach the anchoring member 410 to the resiliently compressible tri-lobular body 400 and/or the pedicle (not shown).
- FIG. 5 shows an interspinous stabilizer 100 having a resiliently compressible body 114 that comprises a top end 500 and a bottom end 504 that are adapted for contacting the surfaces of superior spinous process 10 A and inferior spinous process 10 B, respectively.
- the interspinous stabilizer 100 of FIG. 5 also comprises a first non-elastic anchoring member 510 , a second non-elastic anchoring member 520 , and a hinge 530 that operatively joins the first non-elastic anchoring member 510 and the second non-elastic anchoring member 520 .
- the first non-elastic anchoring member 510 comprises a first anterior anchoring end 514 that is connected to the top end 500 of the resiliently compressible body 114 and a first posterior anchoring end 518 that is adapted for anchoring or affixing to the inferior spinous process 10 B posterior to the resiliently compressible body 114 .
- the second non-elastic anchoring member 520 comprises a second anterior anchoring end 524 that is connected to the bottom end 504 of the resiliently compressible body 114 and a second posterior anchoring end 528 that is adapted for anchoring or affixing to the superior spinous process 10 A posterior to the resiliently compressible body 114 .
- the hinge 530 joins the two anchoring members 510 and 520 at a location between the anterior anchoring ends and the posterior anchoring ends such that the first and the second non-elastic anchoring members 510 and 520 form an X-shape like configuration.
- a distraction force is supplied by a spacer (i.e., a resiliently compressible body 114 ) between the top end 500 and the bottom end 504 . This results in a compressive force being applied at posterior portion of the spinous processes 10 as illustrated by arrows 540 A and 540 B.
- a tensile member 550 that is resiliently stretchable can also be provided, e.g., at or near the first and the second posterior anchoring ends 518 and 528 .
- the tensile member 550 can provide additional distraction between the top end 500 and the bottom end 504 and additional compressive force between the posterior portions of the spinous processes 10 .
- a torsion spring (not shown) can also be placed at or near the hinge 530 resulting in a further distraction between the top end 500 and the bottom end 504 and compression between the first and the second posterior anchoring ends 518 and 528 .
- the first non-elastic anchoring member 510 and the second non-elastic anchoring member 520 can be affixed to the bone or simply wrapped around the spinous processes 10 . Suitable methods for affixing anchoring members 510 and 520 are well known to one skilled in the art.
- the interspinous stabilizer 100 of the present invention can also be a two piece unit as illustrated in FIG. 6 .
- the two piece unit comprises a resiliently compressible body 114 that serves as a distraction member and an operatively interconnected resiliently stretchable member 600 that is designed to create or generate a compressive force posterior to the distraction member.
- the distraction member i.e., resiliently compressible body 114
- the resiliently stretchable member 600 are operatively interconnected by the virtue of having both of them being connected to the same adjacent spinous processes.
- the resiliently compressible body 114 comprises a top anchoring end 610 and a bottom anchoring end 614 for affixing the distraction member to the superior and inferior spinous processes 10 A and 10 B.
- the interspinous stabilizer 100 shown in FIG. 6 comprises a compressive force generating piece (i.e., resiliently stretchable member 600 ) that is located posterior to the distraction member.
- a compressive force generating piece i.e., resiliently stretchable member 600
- the distraction member and the resiliently stretchable member 600 can be an integral unit.
- either one or both of the distraction member and a compressive force generating member can be attached to the bone or can simply be wrapped around the superior surface of the superior process 10 A or inferior surface of the inferior process 10 B.
- FIG. 7 illustrates an interspinous stabilizer 100 of the present invention that comprises a resiliently compressible body 114 comprising a top end 704 and a bottom end 708 .
- the interspinous stabilizer 100 of FIG. 7 further comprises a superior anchoring member 710 and an inferior anchoring member 720 .
- the superior anchoring member 710 comprises a superior anterior anchoring end 714 that is connected to the top end 704 and a superior posterior anchoring end 718 that is adapted for anchoring to the superior spinous process 10 A posterior to the resiliently compressible body 114 .
- the inferior anchoring member 720 comprises an inferior anterior anchoring end 724 that is connected to the bottom end 708 and an inferior posterior anchoring end 728 that is adapted for anchoring to the inferior spinous process 10 B posterior to the resiliently compressible body 114 .
- the resiliently compressible body 114 can include a coil spring (not shown) encapsulated within a body to provide resiliency. In this manner, the body 114 can comprise a non-resilient material.
- the resiliently compressible body 114 is placed between a superior spinous process 10 A and an inferior spinous process 10 B to create a desired distraction.
- a compressive force is applied to the spinous processes 10 posterior to the resiliently compressible body 114 .
- implantation of the implantable stabilizer 100 of FIG. 7 is typically carried out by affixing the superior anchoring member 710 and the inferior anchoring member 720 to the spinous processes 10 while the rotational moment is applied.
- FIGS. 8A and 8B illustrate an interspinous implant that comprises a resiliently compressible elongated body 810 , a first anchoring member 820 and a second anchoring member 830 .
- the resiliently compressible elongated body 810 is adapted for positioning between a superior spinous process 10 A and an inferior spinous process 10 B.
- the resiliently compressible elongated body 810 comprises an anterior end 814 and a posterior end 818 .
- Each of the anchoring members 820 and 830 is comprised of an elastic material, a rod, or other similar material, or a combination thereof.
- these anchoring members 820 and 830 serve as struts and each is comprised of a relatively stiff or non-stretchable material.
- the first anchoring member 820 is affixed to the superior spinous process 10 A while the second anchoring member 830 is affixed to the inferior spinous process 10 B.
- two anchoring members 820 and 830 are attached to the resiliently compressible elongated body 810 at different positions of the resiliently compressible elongated body 810 , e.g., one is attached relatively posterior to the other. This allows the resiliently compressible elongated body 810 to lift at one end during flexion as shown in FIG. 8B and provide a counter force that stabilizes the spine.
- FIGS. 9A , 9 B, and 9 C show another interspinous stabilizer 100 configuration of the present invention.
- This configuration comprises a resiliently flexible U-shaped body 900 comprising a central portion 910 and two branches 920 A and 920 B.
- the U-shaped body 900 is adapted for positioning between adjacent superior and inferior spinous processes (not shown in FIGS. 9A and 9B ).
- Each of the branches 920 A and 920 B is adapted for contacting the surfaces of the spinous processes when the stabilizer 100 is implanted.
- the branches 920 A and 920 B can optionally comprise a pair of tabs 930 that project from an outer face of the branches, thereby providing a stirrup-like configuration for receiving a spinous process of a vertebra. These tabs 930 help stabilize and/or locate the U-shaped body 900 medial/laterally within the spinous processes.
- the interspinous stabilizer 100 of FIGS. 9A , 9 B, and 9 C also comprises a resiliently stretchable anchoring member 940 that is operatively connected to near the central portion 910 of the U-shaped body 900 .
- the anchoring member 940 is adapted for attaching to the superior and inferior spinous processes 10 A and 10 B.
- the U-shaped body 900 may also comprise an anchoring member affixing element 950 , preferably, within an interior surface of the U-shaped body 900 .
- the anchoring member affixing element 950 is adapted to affix the optional anchoring member 940 to the U-shaped body 900 .
- the anchoring member affixing element 950 can be an open slot located within the U-shaped body 900 . In this manner, anchoring member 940 can be inserted through the open slot (i.e., anchoring member affixing element 950 ) and affixed to a spinous process. See FIG. 9B . While FIGS.
- FIGS. 9A and 9B show a U-shaped body having two open slots for affixing the anchoring member 940 , it should be appreciated that a single anchoring member affixing element 950 (e.g., an open slot) can be used to attach both anchoring members 940 .
- a single anchoring member affixing element 950 e.g., an open slot
- an opening is used as the anchoring member affixing element 950 to accommodate the method of attachment.
- the anchoring member affixing element 950 is typically used for affixing or placing a flexible cable, e.g., resiliently stretchable anchoring member 940 , that maintains an appropriate mechanical advantage to support the vertebral bodies while reducing the incidence of kyphosis due to the moment induced as a result of the offset placement.
- the resiliently stretchable anchoring member can comprise, but is not limited to, a round cord or a flat strap.
- the stabilizer 100 shown in FIG. 9A comprises a pair of relatively flat springs (branches 920 A and 920 B) that are relatively parallel to each other. However, as shown in FIG. 9C , these two flat springs need not be parallel to each other. In fact, in some cases it is preferred that these two springs are at an angle with respect to one another. Typical configuration will often be dictated by the configuration of the two adjacent spinous processes to be stabilized.
- the interspinous stabilizers 100 of the present invention provide rotational moment, i.e., apply force to restore lordosis, at all times.
- rotational moment i.e., apply force to restore lordosis
- FIGS. 5 , 6 , 8 A and 8 B can be made to apply rotational moment only in response to flexion induced kyphosis, i.e., forward bending of the spine by the patient.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Orthopedic Medicine & Surgery (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Neurology (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Prostheses (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention provides various interspinous vertebral implants and methods for using the same for dynamic stabilization of a spine. The interspinous vertebral implants of the present invention comprise a resiliently compressible body that is adapted for position between adjacent superior and inferior spinous processes, and an anchoring member that is affixed to the superior and the inferior spinous processes posterior to the resiliently compressible body. The anchoring member provides a compressive force while the resiliently compressible body provides a distraction. Without being bound by any theory, it is believed that the combination of the distraction and compressive forces created by interspinous vertebral implants of the present invention result in a rotational moment, which alleviates compression on the intervertebral disk.
Description
- This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/328,393, filed Jan. 9, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference.
- The present invention relates to interspinous vertebral implants and methods for using the same for dynamic stabilization of the spine.
- Damage to an intervertebral disk typically results in abnormal play of the vertebrae contiguous to this disk. This play subjects the posterior articular processes to considerable stresses, generating very painful wear and tear of these processes and general instability of the spinal column. Such instability can also result from an operation performed on a herniated intervertebral disk, which entails access to the disk, thereby weakening the ligament system of the articulation, or can result from certain cases of arthrosis which also subjects the posterior articulations to considerable and painful stresses.
- Early implant devices for bracing the spinal column comprise rigid elements which are connected to means of osseous anchoring. The rigid elements frequently consist of metal rods which are implanted along several vertebrae, on either side of the spinous processes. These early devices had the disadvantage of being difficult to implant, and necessitated considerable and complex work in putting them into place. Moreover, they immobilized a relatively long vertebral segment, which significantly reduced the mobility of the patient and subjected the articulations situated on either side of this rigid segment to considerable stresses which often generated new pathological conditions.
- Some recently developed interspinous stabilizers are designed to be inserted between the spinous processes. For example, one such stabilizer comprises an interspinous bearing cushion which is fixed to the spinal column by a textile ligament which surrounds the processes. One of the major disadvantages of the bearing cushion is being relatively rigid and holding the vertebrae in a specific position, thereby creating discomfort for the patient. In addition, the bearing cushion tends to wear under the influence of repeated stresses to which it is subjected.
- Other relatively recent interspinous stabilizers have anchoring members, which are adapted to be attached to processes, directly perpendicular to a spring body that provides stability during extension. These interspinous stabilizers, while helpful in limiting the range of spinal motion during extension, lack sufficient support in flexion and thus may create a flat back or kyphotic positioning in the spine. Moreover, these interspinous stabilizers may produce an undesirable load environment at adjacent spine levels.
- Therefore, there is a need for interspinous stabilizers that can provide stability during both flexion and extension.
- One aspect of the present invention provides methods and devices for dynamically stabilizing adjacent vertebral bodies. In one embodiment, methods of the present invention include inserting a resiliently compressible body between adjacent superior and inferior spinous processes, where the resiliently compressible body contacts the respective surfaces of the spinous processes thereby providing a distraction between the superior and inferior spinous processes and affixing an anchoring member to the superior and inferior spinous processes relatively posterior to the resiliently compressible body thereby providing a rotational moment which reduces the amount of compressive force in the anterior portion of the vertebral body.
- One aspect of the present invention provides an interspinous vertebral implant that includes a distracting member comprising a compressible body adapted for positioning between adjacent superior and inferior spinous processes and an anchoring member that is capable of applying compressive force, wherein said anchoring member is capable of being anchored to the superior spinous process and the inferior spinous process.
- In one embodiment, the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention comprises a resiliently compressible body that is adapted to be inserted between adjacent superior and inferior spinous processes. In this manner, the resiliently compressible body contacts the respective surfaces of the spinous processes thereby providing a distraction between the superior and inferior spinous processes. The interspinous stabilizers also comprise an anchoring member that can be used to affix the stabilizers to the superior and inferior spinous processes relatively posterior to the resiliently compressible body. Typically, the anchoring member also provides a compressive force to the spinous processes. Without being bound by any theory, it is believed that the combination of the distraction and compressive forces results in creation of a rotational moment that is believed to reduce the amount of compressive force in the anterior portion of the vertebral body, in particular on the intervertebral disk. Thus unlike other conventional interspinous stabilizers, it is believed that the interspinous stabilizers of the present invention reduce the amount of compressive force on the intervertebral disk thereby providing a significant relief to a patient.
-
FIG. 1A is a side view of one embodiment of the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention following implantation; -
FIG. 1B is a perspective view ofFIG. 1A ; -
FIG. 2A is a side view of another embodiment of the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention following implantation; -
FIG. 2B is a plane view ofFIG. 2A in the plane A-A showing a method of anchoring the interspinous stabilizer shown inFIG. 2A ; -
FIG. 3A is a perspective view of another embodiment of the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention; -
FIG. 3B is a cross-sectional view of the interspinous stabilizer ofFIG. 3A ; -
FIGS. 4A and 4B are side views of another embodiment of the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention with different anchoring member shapes; -
FIG. 5 is a side view of another embodiment of the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention following implantation; -
FIG. 6 is a side view of another embodiment of the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention following implantation; -
FIG. 7 is a side view of another embodiment of the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention following implantation; -
FIG. 8A is a side view of another embodiment of the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention following implantation and at resting stage; -
FIG. 8B is a side view of the interspinous stabilizer ofFIG. 8A at flexion; -
FIGS. 9A and 9B are two different perspective views of another embodiment of the interspinous stabilizer of the present invention; and -
FIG. 9C is a side view of the interspinous stabilizer ofFIGS. 9A and 9B following implantation. - The present invention provides implantable interspinous stabilizers that provide a dynamic stability during flexion and extension and methods for using the same. In particular, the present invention provides methods and interspinous stabilizers that provide a distraction force between the adjacent superior and inferior spinous processes and a posterior compressive force on these spinous processes. As used herein, “compressive force” refers to a force that, in the absence of any counter force, will cause two spinous processes to move closer to one another. And the terms “distraction” or “distraction force” refers to a force that, in the absence of any counter force, will cause two vertebral bodies to move further apart from one another. Distraction of the adjacent spinous processes is provided by placing a distraction member between the adjacent superior and inferior spinous processes. Typically, the distraction member comprises a resiliently compressible body that can be deformed when compressed. The term “resilient” has the conventional meaning known to one skilled in the art, including having a characteristic of being capable of withstanding a substantial amount of external force without being permanently deformed and being able to revert back to substantially its original shape when the external force is removed.
- The interspinous stabilizers and methods of the present invention prevent or reduce the incidence of a flat back or kyphotic positioning in the spine by providing, in addition to distraction, a compressive force on the adjacent spinous processes, thereby at least partially counteracting the effect of distraction. Such a compressive force is generally applied using at least one anchoring element that is affixed to the spinous processes. The anchoring element is typically affixed relatively posterior to the location of the distractive member.
- The anchoring element is adapted to exert a compressive force on the superior spinous process and the inferior spinous process that, in the absence of any counter force, will result in bringing these two spinous processes closer to each other. Combination of the distraction member and the compressive force results in a rotational moment of vertebrae with the distraction element being the center of the rotational moment. As used herein, “rotational moment” refers to the force that is exerted to the adjacent vertebrae such that a compressive force is exerted on the spinous processes of the two vertebrae and a separation force is exerted on the anterior portion of the two vertebrae, e.g., vertebral bodies. That is, the term refers to restoring lordosis, i.e., force restoring the normal curvature of the spine. Without being bound by any theory, it is believed that this rotational moment exerts a separation force that, in the absence of any counter force, will cause the anterior portion of the two vertebral bodies to move further apart (or at least reduce the amount of compressive force) from one another thereby providing at least a partial relief from compression of the intervertebral disk, especially on the anterior portion of the intervertebral disk.
- The distraction element is adapted to be placed between adjacent superior and inferior spinous processes and contacting the respective surfaces of the spinous processes. Once implanted, the distraction element stabilizes and provides additional support during extension of the spine. During flexion, the compressive force of the anchoring element increases as the amount of flexion increases, thereby providing proportionally increasing counter force to the amount of flexion. Accordingly, interspinous stabilizers of the present invention provide a dynamic stability during both flexion and extension.
- The present invention will now be described with regard to the accompanying drawings which assist in illustrating various features of the invention. In this regard, the present invention generally relates to interspinous stabilizers and methods for using the same. That is, the invention relates to implants that are intended to be inserted between the spinous processes of two contiguous vertebrae.
- Several different embodiments of the present invention interspinous stabilizers are generally illustrated in the accompanying
FIGS. 1A through 9C , which are provided for the purpose of merely illustrating the practice of the present invention. It should be appreciated that these Figures are presented only for illustrative purposes and do not constitute limitations on the scope of the present invention. - Referring now to
FIGS. 1A and 1B , in one particular embodiment of the present invention theinterspinous stabilizer 100 comprises adistraction element 110 and ananchoring element 120. As can be seen, the anchoringelement 120 is attached to thespinous process 10 of twoadjacent vertebrae 20 near the posterior end of the spinous processes 10. The twoarms 124 of theanchoring element 120 extend anteriorly and posteriorly to engage thespinous processes anchoring element arms 124 are joined by aspring configuration 128. InFIGS. 1A and 1B , thespring portion 128 that is connected to theanchoring element arms 124 is a coil spring configuration; however, it should be appreciated that other spring configurations known to one skilled in the art can also be used. Thecoil spring 128 is at least partially enclosed or encapsulated within a resilientlycompressible body 114 to form thedistraction element 110. The overall shape of thedistraction element 110 is not critical as long as it can be inserted between two adjacent spinous processes 10 to provide a sufficient distraction necessary to stabilize the spine. For example, the overall shape of thedistraction element 110 can be rectangular, oblong, oval, etc. Typically, however, the overall shape of thedistraction element 110 inFIGS. 1A and 1B is cylindrical. - The resiliently
compressible body 114 can be made from any suitable material known to one skilled in the art including, but not limited to, elastomer, plastic, rubber, silicon, or a combination thereof. Typically, the resiliently compressible body is made from a material comprising an elastomeric material. It should be appreciated, however, that regardless of the material used, the outer surface of the resilientlycompressible body 114 is preferably biocompatible or non-immunogenic. While not shown in any of the drawings, the resilientlycompressible body 114 can alternatively comprise a spring that is at least partially enclosed or encapsulated within a non-elastomeric or an elastomeric material. In this manner, the majority of resiliency is attributable to the spring rather than the material itself. - The force of the anchoring
element arms 124 is applied to the spinous processes 10 posterior to the center of thecoil spring 128 and the resilientlycompressible body 114. Theinterspinous stabilizer 100 is shown inFIGS. 1A and 1B with the anchoringelement 120 attached to the spinous processes 10 through ahole 30 in the spinous processes. In this particular embodiment, the anchoringelement 120 comprises two anchoringelement arms 124 each of which goes through therespective holes 30 in the spinous processes 10 and hooks to the other side of the spinous processes 10. However, it should be appreciated that a variety of other methods, such as a screw or nuts and bolts, known to one skilled in the art can also be used to affix theanchoring element 120 to the spinous processes 10. - The
distraction element 110, comprisingcoil spring 128 and the resilientlycompressible body 114, provides distraction of the spinous processes 10 on the anterior portion while theanchoring element 120 through twoarms 124 of thecoil spring 128 is adapted to provide compressive forces (as illustrated by the arrows 50) on the posterior portion of the spinous processes 10. Without being bound by any theory, it is believed that the compressive force applied by the anchoringelement 120 creates a lever or a rotational moment while maintaining lordosis of the spine section. - As stated above, a variety of other methods are known to one skilled in the art for affixing the
anchoring element 120 to the spinous processes 10.FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate one of the alternative methods for affixing theanchoring element 120 to the spinous processes 10. In this example, the anchoringelement arms 124 are terminated with aU-shaped end 132. In affixing theanchoring element 120 to the spinous processes 10, theU-shaped end 132 is used to hook theanchoring element arms 124 onto the spinous processes 10. Once theU-shaped end 132 is hooked onto the edges of thespinous process 10, theU-shaped end 132, which may be malleable, can be crimped to the bone to provide a tighter linkage. As shown inFIG. 2A , the width of the anchoringelement arms 124 can be tapered such that the width of the anchoringelement arm 124 near theU-shaped end 132 is wider than the width of the anchoring element arm near thedistraction element 110. -
FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate another distraction element. In this illustration, the anchoringelement 120 is similar to those described above in reference toFIGS. 2A and 2B ; however, it should be appreciated that theU-shaped end 132 is not essential and other configurations of theanchoring element 120 can be used to affix theanchoring element 120 to the spinous processes 10. InFIGS. 3A and 3B , the distraction element comprises coupledbody unit 150 that is encompassed or encapsulated within a resilientlycompressible body 114. Typically, the resilientlycompressible body 114 is made from a material comprising an elastomeric material. As stated above, the shape of the distraction element is not important as long as it is adapted to be placed between two adjacent spinous processes 10, i.e., a superior and an inferior spinous process, 10A and 10B, respectively. Typically, however, the distraction element is cylindrical in shape. - The coupled
body unit 150 comprises a firstrigid piece 154A and a secondrigid piece 154B. The firstrigid piece 154A comprises afirst coupling member 158A and afirst anchoring member 136A. Similarly, the secondrigid piece 154B comprises asecond coupling member 158B and asecond anchoring member 136B. Both of thefirst anchoring member 136A and thesecond anchoring member 136B are adapted to be affixed to the superiorspinous processes 10, at a location posterior to thedistraction element 110, e.g., the elastomeric body. As shown inFIG. 3B , when coupled together, thefirst coupling member 158A and thesecond coupling member 158B are adapted to rotate relative to each other. - The coupled
body unit 150 can further comprise a spring or a spring-like mechanism (not shown) within its body such that when thefirst coupling member 158A and thesecond coupling member 158B are rotated relative to each other, the rotation creates a rotational moment that exerts a force to bring the firstrigid piece 154A and the secondrigid piece 154B to its resting position. The resting position of the firstrigid piece 154A and the secondrigid piece 154B, relative to each other, can be parallel, i.e., in the same plane and direction to one another as shown inFIG. 3A or be parallel but the direction of the firstrigid piece 154A and the secondrigid piece 154B can be at an angle relative to one another. The degree of angle between the firstrigid piece 154A and the secondrigid piece 154B can range anywhere between 0° (parallel and in the same direction) and 90°, preferably 0° and 60°. It should be appreciated, however, that any angle necessary to affix the firstrigid piece 154A and the secondrigid piece 154B to their respective spinous processes at a resting or “natural” position of the spinous processes may be used. - It should be appreciated that any method or device known in the art of mechanical devices or one skilled in the art can be utilized for coupling the first
rigid piece 154A and the secondrigid piece 154B. Suitable coupling mechanisms include, but are not limited to, a socket and a socket insert, as illustrated inFIG. 3B , and a ball and socket coupling mechanism. WhileFIG. 3B shows thefirst coupling member 158A as a female part and thesecond coupling member 158B as a male part, this configuration can be switched. - In one illustrative example, a rotational moment is generated between the first
rigid piece 154A and the secondrigid piece 154B by using the elastomeric body (i.e., a resiliently compressible body 114) to generate a spring-like action. For example, inFIGS. 3A and 3B , the elastomeric body comprises tworadial slots 140 through which thefirst anchoring member 136A and thesecond anchoring member 136B protrude. InFIG. 3A , the firstrigid piece 154A and the secondrigid piece 154B are parallel to one another in the same direction. When thefirst anchoring member 136A and thesecond anchoring member 136B are affixed to the superiorspinous process 10A and the inferiorspinous process 10B, respectively, (spinous processes are not shown inFIGS. 3A and 3B ) the elastomeric body becomes twisted (not shown), thereby creating a spring-like action on the elastomeric body resulting in a generation of a rotational moment on the firstrigid piece 154A and the secondrigid piece 154B. In this case, the material used for the elastomeric body should be such that it is able to generate a sufficient rotational moment to be useful. - Another example of the
interspinous stabilizer 100 of the present invention is exemplified inFIGS. 4A and 4B . In this example, the distraction element comprises a resiliently compressible tri-lobular shaped body 400 (i.e., triangular in shape with rounded edges thereby providing eccentric placement of arms). The anchoring element comprises a resilientlystretchable anchoring member 410. Preferably, the anchoring element is located posterior to the mid-point ofbody 400. When implanted, the resilientlystretchable anchoring member 410 is affixed or anchored to the spinous processes 10. As the figures illustrate, the resilientlystretchable anchoring member 410 is attached to a region that is posterior to the mid-point or the center of the tri-lobularshaped body 400. Theinterspinous stabilizer 100 ofFIGS. 4A and 4B can be constructed as a one piece unit, or it can be constructed as a two or more piece unit in which a fastener orother fastening mechanism 420 is used to attach the resilientlystretchable anchoring member 410 to the resiliently compressible tri-lobularshaped body 400. - The
interspinous stabilizer 100 ofFIGS. 4A and 4B can also include a fixation member (not shown) to attach theinterspinous stabilizer 100 to a pedicle (not shown). Suitable fixation members are well known to one skilled in the art and include, but are not limited to, a screw, a nut and bolt, or other mechanism suitable for affixing or attaching the resiliently compressibletri-lobular body 400 and/or the resilientlystretchable anchoring member 410 to the pedicle. This fixation member (not shown) can be used in place of or in addition to afastener 420 to attach the anchoringmember 410 to the resiliently compressibletri-lobular body 400 and/or the pedicle (not shown). -
FIG. 5 shows aninterspinous stabilizer 100 having a resilientlycompressible body 114 that comprises atop end 500 and abottom end 504 that are adapted for contacting the surfaces of superiorspinous process 10A and inferiorspinous process 10B, respectively. Theinterspinous stabilizer 100 ofFIG. 5 also comprises a firstnon-elastic anchoring member 510, a secondnon-elastic anchoring member 520, and ahinge 530 that operatively joins the firstnon-elastic anchoring member 510 and the secondnon-elastic anchoring member 520. - The first
non-elastic anchoring member 510 comprises a first anterior anchoringend 514 that is connected to thetop end 500 of the resilientlycompressible body 114 and a firstposterior anchoring end 518 that is adapted for anchoring or affixing to the inferiorspinous process 10B posterior to the resilientlycompressible body 114. The secondnon-elastic anchoring member 520 comprises a secondanterior anchoring end 524 that is connected to thebottom end 504 of the resilientlycompressible body 114 and a secondposterior anchoring end 528 that is adapted for anchoring or affixing to the superiorspinous process 10A posterior to the resilientlycompressible body 114. Thehinge 530 joins the two anchoringmembers non-elastic anchoring members FIG. 5 , a distraction force is supplied by a spacer (i.e., a resiliently compressible body 114) between thetop end 500 and thebottom end 504. This results in a compressive force being applied at posterior portion of thespinous processes 10 as illustrated byarrows - Optionally, a
tensile member 550 that is resiliently stretchable can also be provided, e.g., at or near the first and the second posterior anchoring ends 518 and 528. Without being bound by any theory, it is believed that thetensile member 550 can provide additional distraction between thetop end 500 and thebottom end 504 and additional compressive force between the posterior portions of the spinous processes 10. Additionally, a torsion spring (not shown) can also be placed at or near thehinge 530 resulting in a further distraction between thetop end 500 and thebottom end 504 and compression between the first and the second posterior anchoring ends 518 and 528. - The first
non-elastic anchoring member 510 and the secondnon-elastic anchoring member 520 can be affixed to the bone or simply wrapped around the spinous processes 10. Suitable methods foraffixing anchoring members - The
interspinous stabilizer 100 of the present invention can also be a two piece unit as illustrated inFIG. 6 . The two piece unit comprises a resilientlycompressible body 114 that serves as a distraction member and an operatively interconnected resilientlystretchable member 600 that is designed to create or generate a compressive force posterior to the distraction member. The distraction member (i.e., resiliently compressible body 114) and the resilientlystretchable member 600 are operatively interconnected by the virtue of having both of them being connected to the same adjacent spinous processes. The resilientlycompressible body 114 comprises atop anchoring end 610 and abottom anchoring end 614 for affixing the distraction member to the superior and inferiorspinous processes - Similar to other illustrated devices, the
interspinous stabilizer 100 shown inFIG. 6 comprises a compressive force generating piece (i.e., resiliently stretchable member 600) that is located posterior to the distraction member. It should be appreciated that the distraction member and the resilientlystretchable member 600 can be an integral unit. As with otherinterspinous stabilizers 100 described herein, either one or both of the distraction member and a compressive force generating member can be attached to the bone or can simply be wrapped around the superior surface of thesuperior process 10A or inferior surface of theinferior process 10B. -
FIG. 7 illustrates aninterspinous stabilizer 100 of the present invention that comprises a resilientlycompressible body 114 comprising atop end 704 and abottom end 708. Theinterspinous stabilizer 100 ofFIG. 7 further comprises asuperior anchoring member 710 and aninferior anchoring member 720. Thesuperior anchoring member 710 comprises a superioranterior anchoring end 714 that is connected to thetop end 704 and a superiorposterior anchoring end 718 that is adapted for anchoring to the superiorspinous process 10A posterior to the resilientlycompressible body 114. Likewise, theinferior anchoring member 720 comprises an inferioranterior anchoring end 724 that is connected to thebottom end 708 and an inferiorposterior anchoring end 728 that is adapted for anchoring to the inferiorspinous process 10B posterior to the resilientlycompressible body 114. - As stated before, the resiliently
compressible body 114 can include a coil spring (not shown) encapsulated within a body to provide resiliency. In this manner, thebody 114 can comprise a non-resilient material. Referring again toFIG. 7 , the resilientlycompressible body 114 is placed between a superiorspinous process 10A and an inferiorspinous process 10B to create a desired distraction. A compressive force is applied to the spinous processes 10 posterior to the resilientlycompressible body 114. Without being bound by a theory, it is believed that having both the compressive force and distraction results in creation of a rotational moment as indicated byarrows implantable stabilizer 100 ofFIG. 7 is typically carried out by affixing thesuperior anchoring member 710 and theinferior anchoring member 720 to the spinous processes 10 while the rotational moment is applied. -
FIGS. 8A and 8B illustrate an interspinous implant that comprises a resiliently compressibleelongated body 810, afirst anchoring member 820 and asecond anchoring member 830. The resiliently compressibleelongated body 810 is adapted for positioning between a superiorspinous process 10A and an inferiorspinous process 10B. The resiliently compressibleelongated body 810 comprises ananterior end 814 and aposterior end 818. Each of the anchoringmembers members - Referring again to
FIGS. 8A and 8B , thefirst anchoring member 820 is affixed to the superiorspinous process 10A while thesecond anchoring member 830 is affixed to the inferiorspinous process 10B. In addition, two anchoringmembers elongated body 810 at different positions of the resiliently compressibleelongated body 810, e.g., one is attached relatively posterior to the other. This allows the resiliently compressibleelongated body 810 to lift at one end during flexion as shown inFIG. 8B and provide a counter force that stabilizes the spine. -
FIGS. 9A , 9B, and 9C show anotherinterspinous stabilizer 100 configuration of the present invention. This configuration comprises a resiliently flexibleU-shaped body 900 comprising acentral portion 910 and twobranches U-shaped body 900 is adapted for positioning between adjacent superior and inferior spinous processes (not shown inFIGS. 9A and 9B ). Each of thebranches stabilizer 100 is implanted. Thebranches tabs 930 that project from an outer face of the branches, thereby providing a stirrup-like configuration for receiving a spinous process of a vertebra. Thesetabs 930 help stabilize and/or locate theU-shaped body 900 medial/laterally within the spinous processes. - The
interspinous stabilizer 100 ofFIGS. 9A , 9B, and 9C also comprises a resilientlystretchable anchoring member 940 that is operatively connected to near thecentral portion 910 of theU-shaped body 900. The anchoringmember 940 is adapted for attaching to the superior and inferiorspinous processes - The
U-shaped body 900 may also comprise an anchoringmember affixing element 950, preferably, within an interior surface of theU-shaped body 900. The anchoringmember affixing element 950 is adapted to affix theoptional anchoring member 940 to theU-shaped body 900. The anchoringmember affixing element 950 can be an open slot located within theU-shaped body 900. In this manner, anchoringmember 940 can be inserted through the open slot (i.e., anchoring member affixing element 950) and affixed to a spinous process. SeeFIG. 9B . WhileFIGS. 9A and 9B show a U-shaped body having two open slots for affixing the anchoringmember 940, it should be appreciated that a single anchoring member affixing element 950 (e.g., an open slot) can be used to attach both anchoringmembers 940. - Generally, at the junction between the
central portion 910 and thebranches member affixing element 950 to accommodate the method of attachment. The anchoringmember affixing element 950 is typically used for affixing or placing a flexible cable, e.g., resilientlystretchable anchoring member 940, that maintains an appropriate mechanical advantage to support the vertebral bodies while reducing the incidence of kyphosis due to the moment induced as a result of the offset placement. The resiliently stretchable anchoring member can comprise, but is not limited to, a round cord or a flat strap. - The
stabilizer 100 shown inFIG. 9A comprises a pair of relatively flat springs (branches FIG. 9C , these two flat springs need not be parallel to each other. In fact, in some cases it is preferred that these two springs are at an angle with respect to one another. Typical configuration will often be dictated by the configuration of the two adjacent spinous processes to be stabilized. - Preferably, the
interspinous stabilizers 100 of the present invention provide rotational moment, i.e., apply force to restore lordosis, at all times. In some configurations, such as theinterspinous stabilizers 100 illustrated inFIGS. 5 , 6, 8A and 8B, can be made to apply rotational moment only in response to flexion induced kyphosis, i.e., forward bending of the spine by the patient. - Other aspects of the present invention provide methods for dynamically stabilizing vertebral bodies using various
interspinous stabilizers 100 disclosed herein. - The foregoing discussion of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing is not intended to limit the invention to the form or forms disclosed herein. Although the description of the invention has included description of one or more embodiments and certain variations and modifications, other variations and modifications are within the scope of the invention, e.g., as may be within the skill and knowledge of those in the art, after understanding the present disclosure. It is intended to obtain rights which include alternative embodiments to the extent permitted, including alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps to those claimed, whether or not such alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps are disclosed herein, and without intending to publicly dedicate any patentable subject matter.
Claims (17)
1. A method of stabilizing adjacent superior and inferior vertebrae, each vertebra including a spinous process, the method comprising:
placing an interspinous vertebral implant between the spinous process of the superior vertebra and the spinous process of the inferior vertebra such that the interspinous vertebral implant simultaneously exerts a compressive force on posterior portions of the superior and inferior spinous processes while exerting opposing distraction forces on anterior portions of the superior and inferior spinous processes.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the interspinous vertebral implant includes a distraction member positioned between the superior and inferior spinous processes exerting the opposing distraction forces.
3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the interspinous vertebral implant includes a first anchoring member secured to the superior spinous process and a second anchoring member secured to the inferior spinous process.
4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the first anchoring member is secured to the superior spinous process posterior of the distraction member.
5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the second anchoring member is secured to the inferior spinous process posterior of the distraction member.
6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the interspinous vertebral implant provides a rotational moment to the superior and inferior spinous processes relatively posterior to the distracting member.
7. The method of claim 5 , wherein the first and second anchoring members are joined by a spring portion.
8. The method of claim 2 , wherein the distraction member is a compressible body contacting surfaces of each of the superior and inferior spinous processes.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the combination of the distraction and compressive forces results in a reduction of compressive forces on an intervertebral disk between the superior and inferior vertebrae.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein simultaneously exerting a compressive force on posterior portions of the superior and inferior spinous processes while exerting opposing distraction forces on anterior portions of the superior and inferior spinous processes restores a normal curvature between the superior and inferior vertebrae.
11. A method of dynamically stabilizing adjacent superior and inferior vertebrae, each vertebra including a spinous process, the method comprising:
applying a distraction force to the spinous processes of the superior and inferior vertebrae by placing a compressible body between the spinous processes, wherein the compressible body contacts a surface of each of the spinous processes; and
simultaneously providing a rotational moment to the superior and inferior spinous processes at a location posterior to the compressible body, thereby reducing the amount of compressive force on an intervertebral disk between the superior and inferior vertebrae.
12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the rotational moment is provided by securing first and second anchoring members to the superior and the inferior spinous processes, respectively, posterior to the compressible body.
13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the first and second anchoring members exert a compressive force on posterior portions of the superior and inferior spinous processes.
14. The method of claim 12 , wherein the first and second anchoring members are joined by a spring portion.
15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the spring portion is at least partially enclosed in the compressible body.
16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the compressible body comprises an elastomeric material.
17. The method of claim 11 , wherein providing a rotational moment restores a normal curvature between the superior and inferior vertebrae.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/048,496 US20110166605A1 (en) | 2006-01-09 | 2011-03-15 | Posterior dynamic stabilization of spine |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/328,393 US7922745B2 (en) | 2006-01-09 | 2006-01-09 | Posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US13/048,496 US20110166605A1 (en) | 2006-01-09 | 2011-03-15 | Posterior dynamic stabilization of spine |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/328,393 Continuation US7922745B2 (en) | 2006-01-09 | 2006-01-09 | Posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20110166605A1 true US20110166605A1 (en) | 2011-07-07 |
Family
ID=38256774
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/328,393 Expired - Fee Related US7922745B2 (en) | 2006-01-09 | 2006-01-09 | Posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US13/048,496 Abandoned US20110166605A1 (en) | 2006-01-09 | 2011-03-15 | Posterior dynamic stabilization of spine |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/328,393 Expired - Fee Related US7922745B2 (en) | 2006-01-09 | 2006-01-09 | Posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7922745B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1971296A4 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2007081440A2 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20140025114A1 (en) * | 2012-01-17 | 2014-01-23 | Chang Kuk Kim | Apparatus of fixing spinous processes |
US20150305779A1 (en) * | 2012-08-21 | 2015-10-29 | Pierre M. Montavon | Spring and device for stabilizing human or animal bone |
Families Citing this family (127)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7833250B2 (en) | 2004-11-10 | 2010-11-16 | Jackson Roger P | Polyaxial bone screw with helically wound capture connection |
US8353932B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2013-01-15 | Jackson Roger P | Polyaxial bone anchor assembly with one-piece closure, pressure insert and plastic elongate member |
US10258382B2 (en) | 2007-01-18 | 2019-04-16 | Roger P. Jackson | Rod-cord dynamic connection assemblies with slidable bone anchor attachment members along the cord |
US10729469B2 (en) | 2006-01-09 | 2020-08-04 | Roger P. Jackson | Flexible spinal stabilization assembly with spacer having off-axis core member |
US8292926B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2012-10-23 | Jackson Roger P | Dynamic stabilization connecting member with elastic core and outer sleeve |
US7862587B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2011-01-04 | Jackson Roger P | Dynamic stabilization assemblies, tool set and method |
US8876868B2 (en) | 2002-09-06 | 2014-11-04 | Roger P. Jackson | Helical guide and advancement flange with radially loaded lip |
US7621918B2 (en) | 2004-11-23 | 2009-11-24 | Jackson Roger P | Spinal fixation tool set and method |
US7377923B2 (en) | 2003-05-22 | 2008-05-27 | Alphatec Spine, Inc. | Variable angle spinal screw assembly |
US7776067B2 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2010-08-17 | Jackson Roger P | Polyaxial bone screw with shank articulation pressure insert and method |
US8366753B2 (en) | 2003-06-18 | 2013-02-05 | Jackson Roger P | Polyaxial bone screw assembly with fixed retaining structure |
US8936623B2 (en) | 2003-06-18 | 2015-01-20 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone screw assembly |
US7766915B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2010-08-03 | Jackson Roger P | Dynamic fixation assemblies with inner core and outer coil-like member |
US7967850B2 (en) | 2003-06-18 | 2011-06-28 | Jackson Roger P | Polyaxial bone anchor with helical capture connection, insert and dual locking assembly |
US8092500B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2012-01-10 | Jackson Roger P | Dynamic stabilization connecting member with floating core, compression spacer and over-mold |
US7179261B2 (en) | 2003-12-16 | 2007-02-20 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Percutaneous access devices and bone anchor assemblies |
US11419642B2 (en) | 2003-12-16 | 2022-08-23 | Medos International Sarl | Percutaneous access devices and bone anchor assemblies |
US7527638B2 (en) | 2003-12-16 | 2009-05-05 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Methods and devices for minimally invasive spinal fixation element placement |
US9050148B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2015-06-09 | Roger P. Jackson | Spinal fixation tool attachment structure |
US8152810B2 (en) | 2004-11-23 | 2012-04-10 | Jackson Roger P | Spinal fixation tool set and method |
US7160300B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2007-01-09 | Jackson Roger P | Orthopedic implant rod reduction tool set and method |
US11241261B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2022-02-08 | Roger P Jackson | Apparatus and method for soft spinal stabilization using a tensionable cord and releasable end structure |
WO2005092218A1 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2005-10-06 | Jackson Roger P | Orthopedic implant rod reduction tool set and method |
US8523904B2 (en) | 2004-03-09 | 2013-09-03 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Methods and systems for constraint of spinous processes with attachment |
US7458981B2 (en) | 2004-03-09 | 2008-12-02 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Spinal implant and method for restricting spinal flexion |
US7651502B2 (en) | 2004-09-24 | 2010-01-26 | Jackson Roger P | Spinal fixation tool set and method for rod reduction and fastener insertion |
US8012207B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2011-09-06 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8425559B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2013-04-23 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8123807B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-02-28 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8152837B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-04-10 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8945183B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-02-03 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous process spacer instrument system with deployment indicator |
US8317864B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-11-27 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8277488B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-10-02 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US7763074B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2010-07-27 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US9119680B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-09-01 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US8167944B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-05-01 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US9023084B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-05-05 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for stabilizing the motion or adjusting the position of the spine |
US8613747B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2013-12-24 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spacer insertion instrument |
US9161783B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-10-20 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US8123782B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-02-28 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US8128662B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-03-06 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Minimally invasive tooling for delivery of interspinous spacer |
US8409282B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2013-04-02 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8273108B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-09-25 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9055981B2 (en) | 2004-10-25 | 2015-06-16 | Lanx, Inc. | Spinal implants and methods |
US8241330B2 (en) | 2007-01-11 | 2012-08-14 | Lanx, Inc. | Spinous process implants and associated methods |
EP1811911A4 (en) | 2004-11-10 | 2012-01-11 | Roger P Jackson | Helical guide and advancement flange with break-off extensions |
US8926672B2 (en) | 2004-11-10 | 2015-01-06 | Roger P. Jackson | Splay control closure for open bone anchor |
US8556938B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2013-10-15 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone anchor with non-pivotable retainer and pop-on shank, some with friction fit |
US9216041B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2015-12-22 | Roger P. Jackson | Spinal connecting members with tensioned cords and rigid sleeves for engaging compression inserts |
US8444681B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2013-05-21 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone anchor with pop-on shank, friction fit retainer and winged insert |
US9918745B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2018-03-20 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone anchor with pop-on shank and winged insert with friction fit compressive collet |
US9393047B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2016-07-19 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone anchor with pop-on shank and friction fit retainer with low profile edge lock |
US20100331887A1 (en) | 2006-01-09 | 2010-12-30 | Jackson Roger P | Longitudinal connecting member with sleeved tensioned cords |
US9168069B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2015-10-27 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone anchor with pop-on shank and winged insert with lower skirt for engaging a friction fit retainer |
US9980753B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2018-05-29 | Roger P Jackson | pivotal anchor with snap-in-place insert having rotation blocking extensions |
ATE524121T1 (en) | 2004-11-24 | 2011-09-15 | Abdou Samy | DEVICES FOR PLACING AN ORTHOPEDIC INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT |
AU2008343092B2 (en) | 2004-12-06 | 2014-09-11 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spacer insertion instrument |
US7604654B2 (en) | 2005-02-22 | 2009-10-20 | Stryker Spine | Apparatus and method for dynamic vertebral stabilization |
US7901437B2 (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2011-03-08 | Jackson Roger P | Dynamic stabilization member with molded connection |
US10076361B2 (en) | 2005-02-22 | 2018-09-18 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone screw with spherical capture, compression and alignment and retention structures |
US8105368B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2012-01-31 | Jackson Roger P | Dynamic stabilization connecting member with slitted core and outer sleeve |
US8109973B2 (en) | 2005-10-31 | 2012-02-07 | Stryker Spine | Method for dynamic vertebral stabilization |
US7922745B2 (en) * | 2006-01-09 | 2011-04-12 | Zimmer Spine, Inc. | Posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8529626B2 (en) * | 2006-05-09 | 2013-09-10 | Centinel Spine, Inc. | Systems and methods for stabilizing a functional spinal unit |
US8337528B2 (en) * | 2006-11-28 | 2012-12-25 | Anova Corporation | Methods and apparatus for stabilizing a spinal segment |
FR2905848B1 (en) * | 2006-09-18 | 2008-12-05 | Spineart Sa | LUMBAR INTER-SPINOUS PROSTHESIS AND ITS APPLICATIONS |
US8845726B2 (en) | 2006-10-18 | 2014-09-30 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Dilator |
US8029541B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2011-10-04 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes |
US8187307B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2012-05-29 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Structures and methods for constraining spinal processes with single connector |
US8162982B2 (en) * | 2006-10-19 | 2012-04-24 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for constraint of multiple spine segments |
EP2088945A4 (en) | 2006-12-08 | 2010-02-17 | Roger P Jackson | Tool system for dynamic spinal implants |
EP2101691A4 (en) * | 2006-12-11 | 2013-08-07 | Samy M Abdou | Dynamic spinal stabilization systems and methods of use |
US9265532B2 (en) | 2007-01-11 | 2016-02-23 | Lanx, Inc. | Interspinous implants and methods |
US8475498B2 (en) | 2007-01-18 | 2013-07-02 | Roger P. Jackson | Dynamic stabilization connecting member with cord connection |
US8366745B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2013-02-05 | Jackson Roger P | Dynamic stabilization assembly having pre-compressed spacers with differential displacements |
US8012177B2 (en) | 2007-02-12 | 2011-09-06 | Jackson Roger P | Dynamic stabilization assembly with frusto-conical connection |
WO2008130564A1 (en) | 2007-04-16 | 2008-10-30 | Vertiflex Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US10383660B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2019-08-20 | Roger P. Jackson | Soft stabilization assemblies with pretensioned cords |
US20090012614A1 (en) * | 2007-05-08 | 2009-01-08 | Dixon Robert A | Device and method for tethering a spinal implant |
EP1994900A1 (en) * | 2007-05-22 | 2008-11-26 | Flexismed SA | Interspinous vertebral implant |
AU2008263148C1 (en) | 2007-05-31 | 2012-05-24 | Roger P. Jackson | Dynamic stabilization connecting member with pre-tensioned solid core |
US8070779B2 (en) * | 2007-06-04 | 2011-12-06 | K2M, Inc. | Percutaneous interspinous process device and method |
US20110172708A1 (en) * | 2007-06-22 | 2011-07-14 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for increasing the bending stiffness of a spinal segment with elongation limit |
US9095384B2 (en) * | 2007-10-17 | 2015-08-04 | Aro Medical Aps U/Stiftelse | Methods, systems and apparatuses for torsional stabilization |
US20090105756A1 (en) * | 2007-10-23 | 2009-04-23 | Marc Richelsoph | Spinal implant |
US8911477B2 (en) | 2007-10-23 | 2014-12-16 | Roger P. Jackson | Dynamic stabilization member with end plate support and cable core extension |
WO2009091922A2 (en) | 2008-01-15 | 2009-07-23 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9603629B2 (en) | 2008-09-09 | 2017-03-28 | Intelligent Implant Systems Llc | Polyaxial screw assembly |
JP2012508597A (en) | 2008-11-12 | 2012-04-12 | シンピライカ スパイン, インコーポレイテッド | Adjusted restraint device and method of use |
KR20120013327A (en) | 2009-03-31 | 2012-02-14 | 란스, 아이엔씨. | Spinous process implant and associated methods |
AR073636A1 (en) * | 2009-05-04 | 2010-11-24 | Pixis S A | INTERESPINOUS DISTRACTOR IMPLANT |
US11229457B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2022-01-25 | Roger P. Jackson | Pivotal bone anchor assembly with insert tool deployment |
US8998959B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2015-04-07 | Roger P Jackson | Polyaxial bone anchors with pop-on shank, fully constrained friction fit retainer and lock and release insert |
US9668771B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2017-06-06 | Roger P Jackson | Soft stabilization assemblies with off-set connector |
US8764806B2 (en) | 2009-12-07 | 2014-07-01 | Samy Abdou | Devices and methods for minimally invasive spinal stabilization and instrumentation |
EP2512357B1 (en) | 2009-12-15 | 2016-07-13 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spinal spacer for cervical and other vertebra, and associated systems |
WO2012033532A1 (en) | 2010-09-08 | 2012-03-15 | Roger Jackson P | Dynamic stabilization members with elastic and inelastic sections |
US8425611B2 (en) | 2010-10-26 | 2013-04-23 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Expandable orthopedic implant system and method |
DE112011103644T5 (en) | 2010-11-02 | 2013-12-24 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone anchor with quick-release shaft and rotatable holder |
US8496689B2 (en) * | 2011-02-23 | 2013-07-30 | Farzad Massoudi | Spinal implant device with fusion cage and fixation plates and method of implanting |
US8425560B2 (en) | 2011-03-09 | 2013-04-23 | Farzad Massoudi | Spinal implant device with fixation plates and lag screws and method of implanting |
JP5865479B2 (en) | 2011-03-24 | 2016-02-17 | ロジャー・ピー・ジャクソン | Multiaxial bone anchor with compound joint and pop-mounted shank |
US8845728B1 (en) | 2011-09-23 | 2014-09-30 | Samy Abdou | Spinal fixation devices and methods of use |
US11812923B2 (en) | 2011-10-07 | 2023-11-14 | Alan Villavicencio | Spinal fixation device |
US20130226240A1 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2013-08-29 | Samy Abdou | Spinous process fixation devices and methods of use |
US9198767B2 (en) | 2012-08-28 | 2015-12-01 | Samy Abdou | Devices and methods for spinal stabilization and instrumentation |
US9320617B2 (en) | 2012-10-22 | 2016-04-26 | Cogent Spine, LLC | Devices and methods for spinal stabilization and instrumentation |
US8911478B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2014-12-16 | Roger P. Jackson | Splay control closure for open bone anchor |
US10058354B2 (en) | 2013-01-28 | 2018-08-28 | Roger P. Jackson | Pivotal bone anchor assembly with frictional shank head seating surfaces |
US8852239B2 (en) | 2013-02-15 | 2014-10-07 | Roger P Jackson | Sagittal angle screw with integral shank and receiver |
US9675303B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-06-13 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Visualization systems, instruments and methods of using the same in spinal decompression procedures |
FR3010628B1 (en) | 2013-09-18 | 2015-10-16 | Medicrea International | METHOD FOR REALIZING THE IDEAL CURVATURE OF A ROD OF A VERTEBRAL OSTEOSYNTHESIS EQUIPMENT FOR STRENGTHENING THE VERTEBRAL COLUMN OF A PATIENT |
US9044273B2 (en) | 2013-10-07 | 2015-06-02 | Intelligent Implant Systems, Llc | Polyaxial plate rod system and surgical procedure |
FR3012030B1 (en) | 2013-10-18 | 2015-12-25 | Medicrea International | METHOD FOR REALIZING THE IDEAL CURVATURE OF A ROD OF A VERTEBRAL OSTEOSYNTHESIS EQUIPMENT FOR STRENGTHENING THE VERTEBRAL COLUMN OF A PATIENT |
US9566092B2 (en) | 2013-10-29 | 2017-02-14 | Roger P. Jackson | Cervical bone anchor with collet retainer and outer locking sleeve |
US9717533B2 (en) | 2013-12-12 | 2017-08-01 | Roger P. Jackson | Bone anchor closure pivot-splay control flange form guide and advancement structure |
US9451993B2 (en) | 2014-01-09 | 2016-09-27 | Roger P. Jackson | Bi-radial pop-on cervical bone anchor |
WO2015171814A1 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2015-11-12 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spinal nerve decompression systems, dilation systems, and methods of using the same |
US10064658B2 (en) | 2014-06-04 | 2018-09-04 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone anchor with insert guides |
US9597119B2 (en) | 2014-06-04 | 2017-03-21 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone anchor with polymer sleeve |
US10857003B1 (en) | 2015-10-14 | 2020-12-08 | Samy Abdou | Devices and methods for vertebral stabilization |
US10744000B1 (en) | 2016-10-25 | 2020-08-18 | Samy Abdou | Devices and methods for vertebral bone realignment |
US10973648B1 (en) | 2016-10-25 | 2021-04-13 | Samy Abdou | Devices and methods for vertebral bone realignment |
US10918422B2 (en) * | 2017-12-01 | 2021-02-16 | Medicrea International | Method and apparatus for inhibiting proximal junctional failure |
US11179248B2 (en) | 2018-10-02 | 2021-11-23 | Samy Abdou | Devices and methods for spinal implantation |
RU189353U1 (en) * | 2019-01-10 | 2019-05-21 | Федеральное государственное бюджетное военное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Военно-медицинская академия имени С.М. Кирова" Министерства обороны Российской Федерации (ВМедА) | IMPLANT FOR REAR SPONDYLODESIS |
WO2023158581A1 (en) | 2022-02-15 | 2023-08-24 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Interspinous spacer and systems utilizing the interspinous spacer |
Citations (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5496318A (en) * | 1993-01-08 | 1996-03-05 | Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc. | Interspinous segmental spine fixation device |
US5645599A (en) * | 1994-07-26 | 1997-07-08 | Fixano | Interspinal vertebral implant |
US5725582A (en) * | 1992-08-19 | 1998-03-10 | Surgicraft Limited | Surgical implants |
US5836948A (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 1998-11-17 | Saint Francis Medical Technologies, Llc | Spine distraction implant and method |
USRE36221E (en) * | 1989-02-03 | 1999-06-01 | Breard; Francis Henri | Flexible inter-vertebral stabilizer as well as process and apparatus for determining or verifying its tension before installation on the spinal column |
US6048342A (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2000-04-11 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant |
US6248106B1 (en) * | 2000-02-25 | 2001-06-19 | Bret Ferree | Cross-coupled vertebral stabilizers |
US20020095154A1 (en) * | 2000-04-04 | 2002-07-18 | Atkinson Robert E. | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
US6440169B1 (en) * | 1998-02-10 | 2002-08-27 | Dimso | Interspinous stabilizer to be fixed to spinous processes of two vertebrae |
US6451019B1 (en) * | 1998-10-20 | 2002-09-17 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Supplemental spine fixation device and method |
US6461359B1 (en) * | 1999-11-10 | 2002-10-08 | Clifford Tribus | Spine stabilization device |
US6582433B2 (en) * | 2001-04-09 | 2003-06-24 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine fixation device and method |
US20030220643A1 (en) * | 2002-05-24 | 2003-11-27 | Ferree Bret A. | Devices to prevent spinal extension |
US20040006343A1 (en) * | 2000-05-25 | 2004-01-08 | Sevrain Lionel C. | Auxiliary vertebrae connecting device |
US6699247B2 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2004-03-02 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant |
US6743257B2 (en) * | 2000-12-19 | 2004-06-01 | Cortek, Inc. | Dynamic implanted intervertebral spacer |
US20040243239A1 (en) * | 2001-08-08 | 2004-12-02 | Jean Taylor | Vertebra stabilizing assembly |
US20070173818A1 (en) * | 2006-01-09 | 2007-07-26 | Zimmer Spine, Inc. | Posterior dynamic stabilization of spine |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
NL7610576A (en) | 1976-09-23 | 1978-03-29 | Gerard Hendrik Slot | Spinal column repositioning system - uses tongs to position screws in column sections before securing to rope |
US7585316B2 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2009-09-08 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
-
2006
- 2006-01-09 US US11/328,393 patent/US7922745B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2006-11-17 WO PCT/US2006/044568 patent/WO2007081440A2/en active Application Filing
- 2006-11-17 EP EP06837829A patent/EP1971296A4/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2011
- 2011-03-15 US US13/048,496 patent/US20110166605A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
USRE36221E (en) * | 1989-02-03 | 1999-06-01 | Breard; Francis Henri | Flexible inter-vertebral stabilizer as well as process and apparatus for determining or verifying its tension before installation on the spinal column |
US5725582A (en) * | 1992-08-19 | 1998-03-10 | Surgicraft Limited | Surgical implants |
US5496318A (en) * | 1993-01-08 | 1996-03-05 | Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc. | Interspinous segmental spine fixation device |
US5645599A (en) * | 1994-07-26 | 1997-07-08 | Fixano | Interspinal vertebral implant |
US5836948A (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 1998-11-17 | Saint Francis Medical Technologies, Llc | Spine distraction implant and method |
US6048342A (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2000-04-11 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant |
US6235030B1 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2001-05-22 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant |
US6699247B2 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2004-03-02 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant |
US6419676B1 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2002-07-16 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant and method |
US6440169B1 (en) * | 1998-02-10 | 2002-08-27 | Dimso | Interspinous stabilizer to be fixed to spinous processes of two vertebrae |
US6451019B1 (en) * | 1998-10-20 | 2002-09-17 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Supplemental spine fixation device and method |
US6461359B1 (en) * | 1999-11-10 | 2002-10-08 | Clifford Tribus | Spine stabilization device |
US6248106B1 (en) * | 2000-02-25 | 2001-06-19 | Bret Ferree | Cross-coupled vertebral stabilizers |
US20020095154A1 (en) * | 2000-04-04 | 2002-07-18 | Atkinson Robert E. | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
US20040006343A1 (en) * | 2000-05-25 | 2004-01-08 | Sevrain Lionel C. | Auxiliary vertebrae connecting device |
US6743257B2 (en) * | 2000-12-19 | 2004-06-01 | Cortek, Inc. | Dynamic implanted intervertebral spacer |
US6582433B2 (en) * | 2001-04-09 | 2003-06-24 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine fixation device and method |
US20040243239A1 (en) * | 2001-08-08 | 2004-12-02 | Jean Taylor | Vertebra stabilizing assembly |
US20030220643A1 (en) * | 2002-05-24 | 2003-11-27 | Ferree Bret A. | Devices to prevent spinal extension |
US20070173818A1 (en) * | 2006-01-09 | 2007-07-26 | Zimmer Spine, Inc. | Posterior dynamic stabilization of spine |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20140025114A1 (en) * | 2012-01-17 | 2014-01-23 | Chang Kuk Kim | Apparatus of fixing spinous processes |
US9314278B2 (en) * | 2012-01-17 | 2016-04-19 | Chang Kuk Kim | Apparatus of fixing spinous processes |
US20150305779A1 (en) * | 2012-08-21 | 2015-10-29 | Pierre M. Montavon | Spring and device for stabilizing human or animal bone |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1971296A2 (en) | 2008-09-24 |
WO2007081440A3 (en) | 2007-10-25 |
US20070173818A1 (en) | 2007-07-26 |
US7922745B2 (en) | 2011-04-12 |
WO2007081440A2 (en) | 2007-07-19 |
EP1971296A4 (en) | 2012-03-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7922745B2 (en) | Posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine | |
US8758409B2 (en) | Interlaminar stabilizing system | |
JP5193025B2 (en) | Facial joint implant cross-linking system | |
JP4559848B2 (en) | Dynamic fixing device and use thereof | |
US7879074B2 (en) | Posterior dynamic stabilization systems and methods | |
US7985244B2 (en) | Posterior dynamic stabilizer devices | |
US7967844B2 (en) | Multi-level posterior dynamic stabilization systems and methods | |
US8529626B2 (en) | Systems and methods for stabilizing a functional spinal unit | |
US8685096B2 (en) | Lumbar fusion device | |
US8323342B2 (en) | Intervertebral implant | |
US7351261B2 (en) | Multi-joint implant | |
US7282065B2 (en) | Disk augmentation system and method | |
US20060271055A1 (en) | Spinal stabilization | |
EP1970031A2 (en) | Dynamic spinal stabilization system and method of using the same | |
US20070123861A1 (en) | Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same | |
US20070213719A1 (en) | Spinal stabilization device | |
KR20060012270A (en) | Dynamic Fixtures and Methods | |
WO2007051924A1 (en) | Scoliosis correction device that can be adjusted during growth | |
WO2009079500A1 (en) | Posterior dynamic stabilization device | |
JP2003529415A (en) | Hyperelastic spinal column stabilization system and method | |
CN102325508A (en) | Compliant Dynamic Spinal Implant | |
US9301787B2 (en) | Medical apparatus and method for spinal surgery | |
US9314346B2 (en) | Spinal implant | |
US20070299442A1 (en) | Vertebral stabilizer |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |