+

US20100281293A1 - Replacing reset pin in buses while guaranteeing system recovery - Google Patents

Replacing reset pin in buses while guaranteeing system recovery Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100281293A1
US20100281293A1 US12/433,499 US43349909A US2010281293A1 US 20100281293 A1 US20100281293 A1 US 20100281293A1 US 43349909 A US43349909 A US 43349909A US 2010281293 A1 US2010281293 A1 US 2010281293A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
client
host
time period
value
component
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US12/433,499
Other versions
US7840900B1 (en
Inventor
Stephan Rosner
Qamrul Hasan
Roger Dwain Isaac
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Monterey Research LLC
Original Assignee
Spansion LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Spansion LLC filed Critical Spansion LLC
Priority to US12/433,499 priority Critical patent/US7840900B1/en
Assigned to SPANSION LLC reassignment SPANSION LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HASAN, QAMRUL, ISAAC, ROGER DWAIN, ROSNER, STEPHAN
Publication of US20100281293A1 publication Critical patent/US20100281293A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US7840900B1 publication Critical patent/US7840900B1/en
Assigned to BARCLAYS BANK PLC reassignment BARCLAYS BANK PLC SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: SPANSION INC., SPANSION LLC, SPANSION TECHNOLOGY INC., SPANSION TECHNOLOGY LLC
Assigned to MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC. reassignment MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC. SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, SPANSION LLC
Assigned to CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION reassignment CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SPANSION, LLC
Assigned to CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, SPANSION LLC reassignment CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION PARTIAL RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Assignors: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Assigned to MONTEREY RESEARCH, LLC reassignment MONTEREY RESEARCH, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
Assigned to MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC. reassignment MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC. CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE 8647899 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 035240 FRAME 0429. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTERST. Assignors: CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, SPANSION LLC
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F1/00Details not covered by groups G06F3/00 - G06F13/00 and G06F21/00
    • G06F1/24Resetting means
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F1/00Details not covered by groups G06F3/00 - G06F13/00 and G06F21/00
    • G06F1/22Means for limiting or controlling the pin/gate ratio
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/07Responding to the occurrence of a fault, e.g. fault tolerance
    • G06F11/0703Error or fault processing not based on redundancy, i.e. by taking additional measures to deal with the error or fault not making use of redundancy in operation, in hardware, or in data representation
    • G06F11/0751Error or fault detection not based on redundancy
    • G06F11/0754Error or fault detection not based on redundancy by exceeding limits
    • G06F11/0757Error or fault detection not based on redundancy by exceeding limits by exceeding a time limit, i.e. time-out, e.g. watchdogs

Definitions

  • the invention is generally related to the field of system and memory buses and more particularly to a system and method to replace a separate reset pin with a reset command without the necessity for the client component circuitry to monitor the control client component circuitry in order to ensure control of the system.
  • Microprocessor devices utilize external pins to interface with other components within a computer system.
  • processors utilize external pins to interface with other components within a computer system.
  • the number of external pins required to interface the host microprocessor with the other components of the computer system also increases.
  • Those other components include a plurality of separate devices such as processors, memories, and peripheral devices, interconnected by one or more buses. Decreasing the number of external pins decreases the cost of the microprocessor and/or the system and memory buses as well as decreases the cost and complexity of the interface circuitry.
  • Computer networks often use what is known as a “client/server system” in which a network host or “host computer” can provide centralized hardware, computation, database access, software resources and network control functions for a number of “client computers” in the network.
  • the client/server model has become one of the central approaches of network computing. Most of the business applications being written today use the client/server model.
  • Traditional network architectures arrange the network server and clients as separate and individually controlled units. Each client is typically a stand-alone PC computer, and as such can operate independently of the network host.
  • the server is generally a fully independent computer, and is capable of independent processing, power cycling and reset/re-initialization.
  • the reset signal typically requires a separate reset pin which reduces pin efficiency because it is rarely used and therefore does not contribute to increasing the data flow through the pins on the system and memory buses.
  • the main reason for reset pins is to provide a guaranteed method to force the system into a predetermined state in the case of error conditions in the system, wherein the host can always reset the client through the reset pin.
  • a traditional reset command transferred through a control bus cannot replace the reset pin because that assumes that the client continuously monitors the control bus and reacts correctly to the reception of a reset command from the host. However, this is not the case, because if the client does not honor a reset command from the host, the system can remain in an un-deterministic state.
  • This type of reset scheme applies also to bus structures within a single computer, rather than to two networks, such as a host component circuitry (e.g., a processor instead of a computer) and a client component circuitry (e.g., a memory or modem device instead of another computer).
  • a host component circuitry e.g., a processor instead of a computer
  • a client component circuitry e.g., a memory or modem device instead of another computer.
  • the system comprises a host component circuitry residing on a first chip and a client component circuitry residing on a second, different chip.
  • a bus connects the host component circuitry to the client component circuitry.
  • the host component circuitry is configured to transfer an initial client value associated with a client component time period to the client component circuitry over the bus on a periodic time basis.
  • the periodic time basis is dictated by a host component time period and the client component time period is greater than the host component time period.
  • the client component circuitry is configured to initiate a reset procedure if the client component time period expires which indicates that the initial client value was not received at a next time on the periodic time basis dictated by the host component time period.
  • Another aspect of the invention provides a method of performing a reset for system recovery.
  • the method comprises transferring an initial client value associated with a client component time period from a host component circuitry residing on a first chip to a client component circuitry residing on a second, different chip over a bus structure.
  • the transfer is performed on a periodic time basis dictated by a host component time period, where the client component time period is greater than the host component time period.
  • the method further initiates a reset procedure in the client component circuitry if a next initial client value is not transferred to the client component circuitry prior to an expiration of the client component time period.
  • the present invention provides a system and method for reducing the pin count of a microprocessor. Further, the present invention replaces a reset pin with a reset command without implying the necessity for the client component circuitry to monitor the control bus in order to ensure control of the system.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating communication between a host component circuitry and a client component circuitry in accordance with at least one aspect of the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating an exemplary methodology for replacing a separate reset pin in buses while guaranteeing system recovery in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention
  • FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating yet another exemplary methodology for replacing a separate reset pin in buses while guaranteeing system recovery in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is yet another flow diagram illustrating an exemplary methodology for replacing a separate reset pin in buses while guaranteeing system recovery in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention.
  • a system 100 for replacing a separate reset pin in a bus with a reset command in order to guarantee system recovery (e.g., between a client and a host).
  • the system 100 comprises a host component circuitry 114 residing on a first chip, for example, that comprises a host lifetime counter 115 , load logic 113 , an initial host value 111 , and an initial client value 117 .
  • the host component circuitry 114 is configured to transfer the initial client value 117 associated with a client component time period to a client component circuitry 102 over a bus 116 .
  • the transfer of the initial client value 117 takes place on a periodic basis that is dictated by a host component time period.
  • the load logic 113 initially loads the initial client value 117 into the host lifetime counter 115 upon an initial system startup, wherein the host lifetime counter 115 loads the initial client value 117 into the client lifetime counter 106 across the bus 116 .
  • the client component circuitry 102 comprises the client lifetime counter 106 and the client component circuitry 102 is configured to communicate with a power-on-reset (POR) 108 and a comparator (CMP) 110 . Subsequently, the initial host value 111 is loaded by the load logic 113 into the host lifetime counter 106 .
  • POR power-on-reset
  • CMP comparator
  • the host lifetime counter 115 and the client lifetime counter 106 are configured to simultaneously decrement from a host start count and a client start count, respectively. Both the host lifetime counter 115 and the client lifetime counter 106 , decrement by a decrement value.
  • the client lifetime counter 106 is configured to decrement by the decrement value from a client start count to a client end count that is equal to the client component time period.
  • the host lifetime counter 115 is configured to decrement by the decrement value from a host start count to the host end count that is equal to the host component time period, discussed supra.
  • the host component time period normally dictates the reset because the host component time period is less than the client component time period. Therefore, the host component circuitry 114 reloads a next initial client value 117 into the client lifetime counter 106 on a periodic basis because the host lifetime counter 115 reaches the end count prior to the client lifetime counter 106 , unless there is a reset condition. In other words, the initial client value 117 and the initial host value 111 are reloaded on a periodic basis as long as the host component circuitry 114 and the client component circuitry 102 remain connected.
  • the power-on-reset 108 can provide a known state within the client component circuitry 102 (e.g., a processor chip) and this can ensure that the initial state of the client component circuitry 102 is always defined.
  • the client component circuitry 102 and the host component circuitry 114 applications may be applications that are executed via the client component circuitry 102 and/or the host component circuitry 114 , respectively.
  • the client component circuitry 102 comprises a command decoder 104 and the client lifetime counter 106 .
  • the bus 116 is configured to connect the host lifetime counter 115 and the client lifetime counter 106 .
  • the client component circuitry 102 will be reset if the client component circuitry 102 and the host component circuitry 114 lose connection. In this case, the host component circuitry 114 is not able to load the initial client value 117 into the client lifetime counter 106 because of the lost connection. Therefore, the client lifetime counter 106 is able to decrement by the decrement value from the client start count to the client end count, which triggers a client reset 120 .
  • the comparator 110 is configured to compare the decremented client value (i.e., a count) to a reference value and in one example, if the decremented client value is equal to, for example, zero or the client end count then the comparator 110 sends a client reset signal to a command decoder 104 that is configured to issue a client reset 120 to a client logic 122 .
  • the host lifetime counter 115 decrements the host count to zero or to the host end count sooner than the client lifetime counter 106 decrements the initial client value 117 to zero or to the client end count. Therefore, if the host component circuitry 114 and the client component circuitry 102 remain connected, the client lifetime counter 106 and the host lifetime counter 115 are being reset to the initial client value 117 and the initial host value 111 , respectively on a periodic time basis (e.g., once per second).
  • the power-on-reset 108 can further initialize the client lifetime counter 106 to zero upon a client component circuitry reset, for example, to clear out the memory registers, and the like.
  • the client logic 122 can be configured to perform logic commands and fundamental operations within the client component circuitry 102 .
  • the power-on-reset 108 is configured to generate a reset signal to the client lifetime counter 106 independent of a command decoder 104 during the client reset.
  • the power-on-reset 108 is configured to generate the client reset signal through the client reset 120 to the client lifetime counter 106 independent of the command decoder 104 .
  • the system has the command decoder 104 to which bits of commands can be supplied in parallel, and which decodes the internal command signals from the commands.
  • the comparator 110 can be an op-amp circuit that compares two inputs and provides a DC output indicating the polarity relationship between the inputs to the command decoder 104 .
  • the comparator 110 compares two data inputs and indicates the result of that comparison in an analogue device.
  • the comparator 110 can be a functional unit that compares two analog variables and indicates the result of that comparison to the command decoder 104 .
  • a method 200 is illustrated in FIG. 2 and will be explained with respect to FIGS. 1 , 3 and 4 , for example.
  • the method 200 begins at 202 wherein the method 200 at 204 transfers an initial client value 117 associated with a client component time period from a host component circuitry 114 to a client component circuitry 102 over a bus 116 .
  • the host component circuitry 114 can reside on a first chip and the client component circuitry 102 can reside on a second chip, different from the first chip.
  • the transfer is performed on a periodic time basis dictated by a host component time period, wherein the client component time period is greater than the host component time period.
  • the method 200 continues, as illustrated in FIG.
  • a method 400 involves loading the initial client value 117 into a client lifetime counter 106 at 402 .
  • an initial host value is loaded into a host lifetime counter 115 .
  • load logic 113 can be utilized to load the initial client value 117 into the host lifetime counter 115 and the initial host value 117 into the host lifetime counter 115 once the initial client value 117 is transferred across the bus 116 .
  • a decrementing of the client lifetime counter 106 and decrementing of the host lifetime counter 115 occur concurrently as shown in method 400 . This is illustrated by the single line with joint arrows pointing to 406 and 410 .
  • the client lifetime counter (CLC) 106 is decremented by the selected decrement value and at 410 the host lifetime counter (HLC) 106 is concurrently decremented by the selected decrement value.
  • the method 400 determines if the host lifetime counter 115 has reached a host end count, in addition at 408 the method 400 determines if the client lifetime counter 106 has reached a client end count. If the host lifetime counter 115 has reached a host end count at 412 then the method 400 returns to method 200 at 204 as illustrated in FIG.
  • the method 400 returns to 410 where the host lifetime counter 115 count is again decremented by the selected decrement value.
  • the method 400 returns to 406 where the client lifetime counter 115 count is again decremented by the selected decrement value.
  • the method 400 proceeds to FIG. 3 at 302 of method 300 .
  • a comparator switches an output state which initiates a reset procedure the re-establish connection, wherein the method ends at 304 .

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Electronic Switches (AREA)

Abstract

Systems and methods are disclosed that replace a separate reset pin in a bus with a reset command that guarantees a system recovery. The system comprises a host component circuitry residing on a first chip and a client component circuitry residing on a second, different chip. A bus connects the host component circuitry to the client component circuitry. The host component circuitry is configured to transfer an initial client value associated with a client component time period to the client component circuitry over the bus on a periodic time basis. The periodic time basis is dictated by a host component time period and the client component time period is greater than the host component time period. The client component circuitry is configured to initiate a reset procedure if the client component time period expires which indicates that the initial client value was not received at a next time on the periodic time basis dictated by the host component time period.

Description

    FIELD OF INVENTION
  • The invention is generally related to the field of system and memory buses and more particularly to a system and method to replace a separate reset pin with a reset command without the necessity for the client component circuitry to monitor the control client component circuitry in order to ensure control of the system.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Microprocessor devices (“processors”) utilize external pins to interface with other components within a computer system. In present computer technology, as the complexity and processing power of microprocessors grow, the number of external pins required to interface the host microprocessor with the other components of the computer system also increases. Those other components include a plurality of separate devices such as processors, memories, and peripheral devices, interconnected by one or more buses. Decreasing the number of external pins decreases the cost of the microprocessor and/or the system and memory buses as well as decreases the cost and complexity of the interface circuitry.
  • Computer networks often use what is known as a “client/server system” in which a network host or “host computer” can provide centralized hardware, computation, database access, software resources and network control functions for a number of “client computers” in the network. The client/server model has become one of the central approaches of network computing. Most of the business applications being written today use the client/server model. Traditional network architectures arrange the network server and clients as separate and individually controlled units. Each client is typically a stand-alone PC computer, and as such can operate independently of the network host. Likewise the server is generally a fully independent computer, and is capable of independent processing, power cycling and reset/re-initialization.
  • Most of these client/server systems contain a reset signal if the host and the client lose connection. The reset signal typically requires a separate reset pin which reduces pin efficiency because it is rarely used and therefore does not contribute to increasing the data flow through the pins on the system and memory buses. The main reason for reset pins is to provide a guaranteed method to force the system into a predetermined state in the case of error conditions in the system, wherein the host can always reset the client through the reset pin.
  • A traditional reset command transferred through a control bus, for example, cannot replace the reset pin because that assumes that the client continuously monitors the control bus and reacts correctly to the reception of a reset command from the host. However, this is not the case, because if the client does not honor a reset command from the host, the system can remain in an un-deterministic state.
  • This type of reset scheme applies also to bus structures within a single computer, rather than to two networks, such as a host component circuitry (e.g., a processor instead of a computer) and a client component circuitry (e.g., a memory or modem device instead of another computer).
  • Accordingly, there is a need to provide a system and method for reducing the pin count of a microprocessor. These and other advantages of the present invention not specifically recited above will become apparent within discussions of the present invention herein.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The following presents a simplified summary of the invention in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the invention. This summary is not an extensive overview of the invention. It is intended neither to identify key or critical elements of the invention nor to delineate the scope of the invention. Rather, the primary purpose of this summary is to present some concepts of the invention in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
  • One aspect of the invention provides a system that replaces a separate reset pin in a bus with a reset command to guarantee a system recovery. The system comprises a host component circuitry residing on a first chip and a client component circuitry residing on a second, different chip. A bus connects the host component circuitry to the client component circuitry. The host component circuitry is configured to transfer an initial client value associated with a client component time period to the client component circuitry over the bus on a periodic time basis. The periodic time basis is dictated by a host component time period and the client component time period is greater than the host component time period. The client component circuitry is configured to initiate a reset procedure if the client component time period expires which indicates that the initial client value was not received at a next time on the periodic time basis dictated by the host component time period.
  • Another aspect of the invention provides a method of performing a reset for system recovery. The method comprises transferring an initial client value associated with a client component time period from a host component circuitry residing on a first chip to a client component circuitry residing on a second, different chip over a bus structure. The transfer is performed on a periodic time basis dictated by a host component time period, where the client component time period is greater than the host component time period. The method further initiates a reset procedure in the client component circuitry if a next initial client value is not transferred to the client component circuitry prior to an expiration of the client component time period.
  • The following description and annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative aspects and implementations of the invention. These are indicative of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the invention may be employed.
  • Accordingly, the present invention provides a system and method for reducing the pin count of a microprocessor. Further, the present invention replaces a reset pin with a reset command without implying the necessity for the client component circuitry to monitor the control bus in order to ensure control of the system. These and other advantages of the present invention not specifically recited above will become apparent within discussions of the present invention herein.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating communication between a host component circuitry and a client component circuitry in accordance with at least one aspect of the present invention;
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating an exemplary methodology for replacing a separate reset pin in buses while guaranteeing system recovery in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention;
  • FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating yet another exemplary methodology for replacing a separate reset pin in buses while guaranteeing system recovery in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention; and
  • FIG. 4 is yet another flow diagram illustrating an exemplary methodology for replacing a separate reset pin in buses while guaranteeing system recovery in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • One or more implementations of the present invention will now be described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. One or more aspects of the invention are hereinafter illustrated and described in the context of an exemplary system and method for replacing a separate reset pin in buses while guaranteeing system recovery.
  • In one exemplary embodiment, as illustrated in FIG. 1, a system 100 is disclosed for replacing a separate reset pin in a bus with a reset command in order to guarantee system recovery (e.g., between a client and a host). In one embodiment, the system 100 comprises a host component circuitry 114 residing on a first chip, for example, that comprises a host lifetime counter 115, load logic 113, an initial host value 111, and an initial client value 117. The host component circuitry 114 is configured to transfer the initial client value 117 associated with a client component time period to a client component circuitry 102 over a bus 116. The transfer of the initial client value 117 takes place on a periodic basis that is dictated by a host component time period. In one embodiment, the load logic 113 initially loads the initial client value 117 into the host lifetime counter 115 upon an initial system startup, wherein the host lifetime counter 115 loads the initial client value 117 into the client lifetime counter 106 across the bus 116.
  • The client component circuitry 102 comprises the client lifetime counter 106 and the client component circuitry 102 is configured to communicate with a power-on-reset (POR) 108 and a comparator (CMP) 110. Subsequently, the initial host value 111 is loaded by the load logic 113 into the host lifetime counter 106.
  • The host lifetime counter 115 and the client lifetime counter 106, in one embodiment, are configured to simultaneously decrement from a host start count and a client start count, respectively. Both the host lifetime counter 115 and the client lifetime counter 106, decrement by a decrement value. The client lifetime counter 106 is configured to decrement by the decrement value from a client start count to a client end count that is equal to the client component time period. The host lifetime counter 115 is configured to decrement by the decrement value from a host start count to the host end count that is equal to the host component time period, discussed supra.
  • The host component time period normally dictates the reset because the host component time period is less than the client component time period. Therefore, the host component circuitry 114 reloads a next initial client value 117 into the client lifetime counter 106 on a periodic basis because the host lifetime counter 115 reaches the end count prior to the client lifetime counter 106, unless there is a reset condition. In other words, the initial client value 117 and the initial host value 111 are reloaded on a periodic basis as long as the host component circuitry 114 and the client component circuitry 102 remain connected.
  • In one embodiment, the power-on-reset 108 can provide a known state within the client component circuitry 102 (e.g., a processor chip) and this can ensure that the initial state of the client component circuitry 102 is always defined. The client component circuitry 102 and the host component circuitry 114 applications, for example, may be applications that are executed via the client component circuitry 102 and/or the host component circuitry 114, respectively.
  • In at least one embodiment, the client component circuitry 102 comprises a command decoder 104 and the client lifetime counter 106. The bus 116 is configured to connect the host lifetime counter 115 and the client lifetime counter 106. Of course, those skilled in the art will recognize many modifications may be made to this configuration, without departing from the scope or spirit of what is described herein.
  • The client component circuitry 102 will be reset if the client component circuitry 102 and the host component circuitry 114 lose connection. In this case, the host component circuitry 114 is not able to load the initial client value 117 into the client lifetime counter 106 because of the lost connection. Therefore, the client lifetime counter 106 is able to decrement by the decrement value from the client start count to the client end count, which triggers a client reset 120.
  • The comparator 110 is configured to compare the decremented client value (i.e., a count) to a reference value and in one example, if the decremented client value is equal to, for example, zero or the client end count then the comparator 110 sends a client reset signal to a command decoder 104 that is configured to issue a client reset 120 to a client logic 122.
  • For example, as discussed supra, in order to prevent unwanted client resets triggered by the client lifetime counter 106 (i.e., decrementing to zero or the a predetermined value) that would normally require a separate reset pin, the host lifetime counter 115 decrements the host count to zero or to the host end count sooner than the client lifetime counter 106 decrements the initial client value 117 to zero or to the client end count. Therefore, if the host component circuitry 114 and the client component circuitry 102 remain connected, the client lifetime counter 106 and the host lifetime counter 115 are being reset to the initial client value 117 and the initial host value 111, respectively on a periodic time basis (e.g., once per second).
  • Still referring to FIG. 1, the power-on-reset 108 can further initialize the client lifetime counter 106 to zero upon a client component circuitry reset, for example, to clear out the memory registers, and the like. The client logic 122 can be configured to perform logic commands and fundamental operations within the client component circuitry 102. In one embodiment, the power-on-reset 108 is configured to generate a reset signal to the client lifetime counter 106 independent of a command decoder 104 during the client reset.
  • In yet another embodiment, the power-on-reset 108 is configured to generate the client reset signal through the client reset 120 to the client lifetime counter 106 independent of the command decoder 104. The system has the command decoder 104 to which bits of commands can be supplied in parallel, and which decodes the internal command signals from the commands. The comparator 110 can be an op-amp circuit that compares two inputs and provides a DC output indicating the polarity relationship between the inputs to the command decoder 104. In another embodiment, the comparator 110 compares two data inputs and indicates the result of that comparison in an analogue device. The comparator 110 can be a functional unit that compares two analog variables and indicates the result of that comparison to the command decoder 104.
  • A method 200 is illustrated in FIG. 2 and will be explained with respect to FIGS. 1, 3 and 4, for example. The method 200 begins at 202 wherein the method 200 at 204 transfers an initial client value 117 associated with a client component time period from a host component circuitry 114 to a client component circuitry 102 over a bus 116. In one embodiment, the host component circuitry 114 can reside on a first chip and the client component circuitry 102 can reside on a second chip, different from the first chip. The transfer is performed on a periodic time basis dictated by a host component time period, wherein the client component time period is greater than the host component time period. The method 200 continues, as illustrated in FIG. 4 at 402 where a method 400 involves loading the initial client value 117 into a client lifetime counter 106 at 402. At 404 an initial host value is loaded into a host lifetime counter 115. In one embodiment, for example load logic 113 can be utilized to load the initial client value 117 into the host lifetime counter 115 and the initial host value 117 into the host lifetime counter 115 once the initial client value 117 is transferred across the bus 116.
  • A decrementing of the client lifetime counter 106 and decrementing of the host lifetime counter 115 occur concurrently as shown in method 400. This is illustrated by the single line with joint arrows pointing to 406 and 410. At 406 the client lifetime counter (CLC) 106 is decremented by the selected decrement value and at 410 the host lifetime counter (HLC) 106 is concurrently decremented by the selected decrement value. At 412 the method 400 determines if the host lifetime counter 115 has reached a host end count, in addition at 408 the method 400 determines if the client lifetime counter 106 has reached a client end count. If the host lifetime counter 115 has reached a host end count at 412 then the method 400 returns to method 200 at 204 as illustrated in FIG. 2. If the host lifetime counter 115 has not reached the host end count at 412 the method 400 returns to 410 where the host lifetime counter 115 count is again decremented by the selected decrement value. At 408 if the client lifetime counter 106 has not reached the client end count at 408 the method 400 returns to 406 where the client lifetime counter 115 count is again decremented by the selected decrement value. However, if at 408 the client lifetime counter 106 has reached the client end count, the method 400 proceeds to FIG. 3 at 302 of method 300. At 302 a comparator switches an output state which initiates a reset procedure the re-establish connection, wherein the method ends at 304.
  • Although the invention has been illustrated and described with respect to one or more implementations, alterations and/or modifications may be made to the illustrated examples without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims. In particular regard to the various functions performed by the above described components or structures (assemblies, devices, circuits, systems, etc.), the terms (including a reference to a “means”) used to describe such components are intended to correspond, unless otherwise indicated, to any component or structure which performs the specified function of the described component (e.g., that is functionally equivalent), even though not structurally equivalent to the disclosed structure which performs the function in the herein illustrated exemplary implementations of the invention. In addition, while a particular feature of the invention may have been disclosed with respect to only one of several implementations, such feature may be combined with one or more other features of the other implementations as may be desired and advantageous for any given or particular application. Furthermore, to the extent that the terms “including”, “includes”, “having”, “has”, “with”, or variants thereof are used in either the detailed description and the claims, such terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising”.

Claims (21)

1. A system providing a reset for system recovery, comprising:
a host component circuitry residing on a first chip;
a client component circuitry residing on a second, different chip; and
a bus connecting the host component circuitry to the client component circuitry;
wherein the host component circuitry is configured to transfer an initial client value associated with a client component time period to the client component circuitry over the bus on a periodic time basis dictated by a host component time period, and wherein the client component time period is greater than the host component time period,
wherein the client component circuitry is configured to initiate a reset procedure if the client component time period expires, thereby indicating that the initial client value was not received a next time on the periodic time basis dictated by the host component time period.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the client component circuitry further comprises a client lifetime counter configured to receive the initial client value and perform a count associated therewith, wherein a time to perform the count is equal to the client component time period.
3. The system of claim 2, wherein the client lifetime counter is configured to decrement from a start count associated with the initial client value to a client end count, wherein a time to decrement from the start count to the end count is equal to the client component time period.
4. The system of claim 3, wherein the client component circuitry further comprises a comparator configured to compare a count of the client lifetime counter to a reference value, wherein when the client lifetime counter reaches the end count, the comparator switches an output state thereof, thereby initiating the reset procedure.
5. The system of claim 4, wherein the client component circuitry further comprises client logic configured to execute the reset procedure in the client component circuitry.
6. The system of claim 2, wherein the host component circuitry further comprises a host lifetime counter configured to load an initial host value therein, wherein the initial host value is associated with the host component time period.
7. The system of claim 6, wherein the host lifetime counter is configured to decrement from a start count associated with the initial host value to a host end count, wherein a time to decrement from the start count to the end count is equal to the host component time period.
8. The system of claim 6, wherein the host component circuitry is further configured to transfer the initial client value to the client component circuitry over the bus when the host lifetime counter reaches the host end count.
9. The system of claim 6, wherein a power-on-reset is configured to generate a reset signal to the client lifetime counter independent of a command decoder during the client reset.
10. The system of claim 7, wherein the client lifetime counter and the host lifetime counter are decremented by a decrement value concurrently.
11. A method of performing a reset for system recovery, comprising:
transferring an initial client value associated with a client component time period from a host component circuitry residing on a first chip to a client component circuitry residing on a second, different chip over a bus structure, wherein the transfer is performed on a periodic time basis dictated by a host component time period, wherein the client component time period is greater than the host component time period; and
initiating a reset procedure in the client component circuitry if a next initial client value is not transferred to the client component circuitry prior to an expiration of the client component time period.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the client component circuitry further comprises a client lifetime counter to receive the initial client value and performing a count associated therewith, wherein a time for performing the count is equal to the client component time period.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the client lifetime counter is configured decrementing from a start count associated with the initial client value to a client end count, wherein a time for decrementing from the start count to the end count is equal to the client component time period.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the client component circuitry further comprising a comparator configured to compare a count of the client lifetime counter to a reference value, wherein when the client lifetime counter reaches the end count, switching the output state of the comparator, thereby initiating the reset procedure.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the client component circuitry further comprising configuring client logic to execute the reset procedure in the client component circuitry.
16. The method of claim 12, wherein the host component circuitry further comprises a host lifetime counter configured to load an initial host value therein, wherein the initial host value is associated with the host component time period.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein the host lifetime counter is configured to decrement from a start count associated with the initial host value to a host end count, wherein a time to decrement from the start count to the end count is equal to the host component time period.
18. The method of claim 16, wherein the host component circuitry is further configured to transfer the initial client value to the client component circuitry over the bus when the host lifetime counter reaches the host end count.
19. The method of claim 16, wherein a power-on-reset is configured to generate a reset signal to the client lifetime counter independent of a command decoder during the client reset.
20. The method of claim 17, wherein decrementing of the client lifetime counter by a decrement value and decrementing of the host lifetime counter by the decrement value occur concurrently.
21. The system of claim 1, wherein the reset procedure is initiated by the client component circuitry if a next initial client value is not transferred to the client component circuitry prior to an expiration of the client component time period.
US12/433,499 2009-04-30 2009-04-30 Replacing reset pin in buses while guaranteeing system recovery Active US7840900B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/433,499 US7840900B1 (en) 2009-04-30 2009-04-30 Replacing reset pin in buses while guaranteeing system recovery

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/433,499 US7840900B1 (en) 2009-04-30 2009-04-30 Replacing reset pin in buses while guaranteeing system recovery

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100281293A1 true US20100281293A1 (en) 2010-11-04
US7840900B1 US7840900B1 (en) 2010-11-23

Family

ID=43031294

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/433,499 Active US7840900B1 (en) 2009-04-30 2009-04-30 Replacing reset pin in buses while guaranteeing system recovery

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US7840900B1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2010140361A (en) * 2008-12-12 2010-06-24 Fujitsu Microelectronics Ltd Computer system and abnormality detection circuit

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4774422A (en) * 1987-05-01 1988-09-27 Digital Equipment Corporation High speed low pin count bus interface
US4779196A (en) * 1985-03-07 1988-10-18 Alcatel N.V. Interface device for controlling command and data transfer between a host computer and a disk controller
US4931748A (en) * 1988-08-26 1990-06-05 Motorola, Inc. Integrated circuit with clock generator
US6066988A (en) * 1997-08-20 2000-05-23 Nec Corporation Phase locked loop circuit with high stability having a reset signal generating circuit
US6516366B1 (en) * 1994-11-09 2003-02-04 Adaptec, Incorporated Serial bus for connecting two integrated circuits with storage for input/output signals
US6904484B1 (en) * 2000-03-30 2005-06-07 Intel Corporation Low pin count (LPC) firmware hub recovery
US20080307287A1 (en) * 2007-06-07 2008-12-11 Crowell Daniel M Systems and methods for recovery from hardware access errors
US20090205050A1 (en) * 2008-02-07 2009-08-13 Analog Devices, Inc. Method and apparatus for hardware reset protection

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4779196A (en) * 1985-03-07 1988-10-18 Alcatel N.V. Interface device for controlling command and data transfer between a host computer and a disk controller
US4774422A (en) * 1987-05-01 1988-09-27 Digital Equipment Corporation High speed low pin count bus interface
US4931748A (en) * 1988-08-26 1990-06-05 Motorola, Inc. Integrated circuit with clock generator
US6516366B1 (en) * 1994-11-09 2003-02-04 Adaptec, Incorporated Serial bus for connecting two integrated circuits with storage for input/output signals
US6066988A (en) * 1997-08-20 2000-05-23 Nec Corporation Phase locked loop circuit with high stability having a reset signal generating circuit
US6904484B1 (en) * 2000-03-30 2005-06-07 Intel Corporation Low pin count (LPC) firmware hub recovery
US20080307287A1 (en) * 2007-06-07 2008-12-11 Crowell Daniel M Systems and methods for recovery from hardware access errors
US20090205050A1 (en) * 2008-02-07 2009-08-13 Analog Devices, Inc. Method and apparatus for hardware reset protection

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7840900B1 (en) 2010-11-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3669653B2 (en) Computer system
US6687851B1 (en) Method and system for upgrading fault-tolerant systems
EP3540605A1 (en) Cpld cache application in a multi-master topology system
US7962786B2 (en) Security features in interconnect centric architectures
US20040003322A1 (en) Method and apparatus for maintaining data integrity using a system management processor
US20100017630A1 (en) Power control system of a high density server and method thereof
CN102402395A (en) Method for uninterrupted operation of high-availability system based on quorum disk
US6532545B1 (en) Apparatus for swapping, adding or removing a processor in an operating computer system
CN107667326B (en) Power management in dual memory platforms
US10955900B2 (en) Speculation throttling for reliability management
US11604635B2 (en) Online program updating method
US20070022229A1 (en) Computer system and computer system control method
US20030065861A1 (en) Dual system masters
US11307844B2 (en) System and method for intelligent power management of firmware updates
US7424630B2 (en) Multiprocessor system with selective processor power down of core and inter-processor communications ports
US7840900B1 (en) Replacing reset pin in buses while guaranteeing system recovery
US20070294600A1 (en) Method of detecting heartbeats and device thereof
US11983111B2 (en) Systems and methods to flush data in persistent memory region to non-volatile memory using auxiliary processor
JP2006172243A (en) Fault-tolerant computer device and synchronization method for the same
US10853297B2 (en) Method for maintaining memory sharing in a computer cluster
US10585833B1 (en) Flexible PCIe topology
US20040093460A1 (en) System and method for adjusting polling of system memory in reponse to changes in monitored data processor activity
US7743193B2 (en) Logic gateway circuit for bus that supports multiple interrupt request signals
JPH0326936B2 (en)
US10303568B2 (en) Systems and methods for high availability of management controllers

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SPANSION LLC, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ROSNER, STEPHAN;HASAN, QAMRUL;ISAAC, ROGER DWAIN;REEL/FRAME:022953/0865

Effective date: 20090430

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

AS Assignment

Owner name: BARCLAYS BANK PLC, NEW YORK

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:SPANSION LLC;SPANSION INC.;SPANSION TECHNOLOGY INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:028840/0001

Effective date: 20100510

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., NEW YORK

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION;SPANSION LLC;REEL/FRAME:035240/0429

Effective date: 20150312

AS Assignment

Owner name: CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SPANSION, LLC;REEL/FRAME:036050/0001

Effective date: 20150601

AS Assignment

Owner name: SPANSION LLC, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: PARTIAL RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:039708/0001

Effective date: 20160811

Owner name: CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: PARTIAL RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:039708/0001

Effective date: 20160811

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

AS Assignment

Owner name: MONTEREY RESEARCH, LLC, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:040911/0238

Effective date: 20160811

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552)

Year of fee payment: 8

AS Assignment

Owner name: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., NEW YORK

Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE 8647899 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 035240 FRAME 0429. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTERST;ASSIGNORS:CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION;SPANSION LLC;REEL/FRAME:058002/0470

Effective date: 20150312

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 12

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载