US20080276104A1 - Power source equiment for power over ethernet system with increased cable length - Google Patents
Power source equiment for power over ethernet system with increased cable length Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20080276104A1 US20080276104A1 US11/984,621 US98462107A US2008276104A1 US 20080276104 A1 US20080276104 A1 US 20080276104A1 US 98462107 A US98462107 A US 98462107A US 2008276104 A1 US2008276104 A1 US 2008276104A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- pse
- voltage
- cable
- approximately
- poe
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F1/00—Details not covered by groups G06F3/00 - G06F13/00 and G06F21/00
- G06F1/26—Power supply means, e.g. regulation thereof
- G06F1/266—Arrangements to supply power to external peripherals either directly from the computer or under computer control, e.g. supply of power through the communication port, computer controlled power-strips
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to Power over Ethernet (PoE), and more particularly to PoE with increased cable lengths.
- PoE Power over Ethernet
- Ethernet communications provide high speed communications between data terminals.
- PoE Power over Ethernet
- PSE Power Source Equipment
- PD Powered Device
- a PSE controller is typically used at the PSE side to enable power management functions of the PD.
- a PSE controller may be used to detect whether a valid PD device is active and to manage power flow to the PD.
- a transceiver physical layer PHY is available to transmit and receive data over the transmission lines.
- PoE Power over Ethernet
- Embodiments can be designed for compliance with IEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.3at, or legacy PoE standards.
- Embodiments include PSE controller designs enabled for increased length PoE, which require minimal or no modification of existing PD designs.
- Embodiments include example modifications of IEEE 802.3af PSE system rules revised for increased cable length applications, including example modifications of PSE port voltage ranges to support IEEE 802.3af compliant PDs across increased cable lengths.
- Embodiments include PDs having increased voltage process and/or added voltage protection circuitry to support increased length PoE.
- FIG. 1 is an overview of a Power over Ethernet (PoE) system.
- PoE Power over Ethernet
- FIG. 2 is a more detailed view of a PoE system.
- FIG. 3 illustrates required PSE classification voltage ranges in example increased length PoE systems.
- FIG. 4 illustrates required PSE classification voltage ranges in example increased length PoE systems.
- FIG. 5 illustrates required PSE post start up voltage ranges in example increased length PoE systems.
- FIG. 6 illustrates required PSE power requirements and cable power loss in example increased length PoE systems.
- FIG. 7 illustrates an IEEE compliant PoE system.
- FIG. 8 illustrates an example increased length PoE system.
- FIG. 9 illustrates an example powered device (PD) chip usable in an increased length PoE system.
- FIG. 10 illustrates an example implementation of a clamping circuit that can be used within the example PD chip of FIG. 8 .
- FIG. 11 illustrates an example implementation of a clamping circuit by means of a dongle.
- Embodiments can be designed for compliance with IEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.3 at, and/or legacy PoE standards. Embodiments include PSE and PD designs enabled for increased length PoE.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a high level diagram of a conventional Power over Ethernet (PoE) system 100 that provides DC power over a common data communications medium.
- PoE Power over Ethernet
- power source equipment 102 provides DC power over conductors 104 , 110 to a powered device (PD) 106 having a representative electrical load 108 .
- PD powered device
- the power transfer between the PSE 102 and the PD 106 occurs simultaneously with the exchange of high speed data over the conductors 104 , 110 .
- the PSE 102 when used with a switching and PHY chip is a data switch having multiple ports that is communicating with one or more PD devices, such as Internet phones, wireless access points, etc.
- the conductor pairs 104 and 110 can carry high speed differential data communications.
- the conductor pairs 104 and 110 each include one or more twisted wire pairs, or any other type of cable or communications media capable of carrying the data transmissions and DC power transmissions between the PSE and PD.
- the conductor pairs 104 and 110 can include multiple twisted pairs, for example four twisted pairs for 1 Gigabit Ethernet. In 10/100 Ethernet, only two of the four pairs carry data communications, and the other two pairs of conductors are unused.
- conductor pairs may be referred to as Ethernet cables or communication links or structured cabling for ease of discussion.
- the conductor pairs may be CAT-5 cable for example.
- FIG. 2 provides a more detailed circuit diagram of the PoE system 100 , where PSE 102 provides DC power to PD 106 over conductor pairs 104 and 110 .
- PSE 102 includes a transceiver physical layer device (or PHY) 202 having full duplex transmit and receive capability through differential transmit port 204 and differential receive port 206 .
- transceivers may be referred to as PHYs.
- a first transformer 208 couples high speed data between the transmit port 204 and the first conductor pair 104 .
- a second transformer 212 couples high speed data between the receive port 206 and the second conductor pair 110 .
- the respective transformers 208 and 212 pass the high speed data to and from the transceiver 202 , but isolate any low frequency or DC voltage from the transceiver ports, which may be sensitive to large voltage values.
- the first transformer 208 includes primary and secondary windings, where the secondary winding (on the conductor side) includes a center tap 210 .
- the second transformer 212 includes primary and secondary windings, where the secondary winding (on the conductor side) includes a center tap 214 .
- the DC output voltage is applied across the respective center taps (e.g. 210 , 214 ) of the transformers 208 and 210 on the conductor side of the transformers.
- An example DC output voltage for the DC supply 218 is 48 volts, but other voltages could be used depending on the voltage/power requirements of the PD 106 .
- the PSE 102 further includes a PSE controller 216 which performs the power management functions based on the dynamic needs of the PD 106 . More specifically, the PSE controller 216 measures the voltage, current, and temperature, etc so as to characterize the power requirements of the PD 106 .
- the PSE controller 216 detects and validates a compatible PD, determines a power classification signature for the validated PD, supplies power to the PD, monitors the power, and reduces or removes the power from the PD when the power is no longer requested or required. During detection, if the PSE finds the PD to be non-compatible, the PSE can prevent the application of power to that PD device, protecting the PD from possible damage.
- the IEEE has imposed standards on the detection, power classification, and monitoring of a PD by a PSE in the IEEE 802.3 ⁇ m standard, which is incorporated herein by reference.
- the PD 106 side includes a transceiver physical layer device 219 having full duplex transmit and receive capability through differential transmit port 236 and differential receive port 234 .
- a third transformer 220 couples high speed data between the first conductor pair 104 and the receive port 234 .
- a fourth transformer 224 couples high speed data between the transmit port 236 and the second conductor pair 110 .
- the respective transformers 220 and 224 pass the high speed data to and from the transceiver 219 , but isolate any low frequency or DC voltage from the sensitive transceiver data ports.
- the third transformer 220 includes primary and secondary windings, where the secondary winding (on the conductor side) includes a center tap 222 .
- the fourth transformer 224 includes primary and secondary windings, where the secondary winding (on the conductor side) includes a center tap 226 .
- the center taps 222 and 226 supply the DC power carried over conductors 104 and 106 to the representative load 108 of the PD 106 , where the load 108 represents the dynamic power draw needed to operate PD 106 .
- a DC-DC converter 230 may be optionally inserted before the load 108 to step down the voltage as necessary to meet the voltage requirements of the PD 106 . Further, multiple DC-DC converters 230 may be arrayed in parallel to output multiple different voltages (e.g. 3 volts, 5 volts, 12 volts) to supply different loads 108 of the PD 106 .
- the PD 106 further includes a PD controller 228 that monitors the voltage and current on the PD side of the PoE configuration.
- the PD controller 228 further provides the necessary impedance signatures on the return conductor 110 during initialization, so that the PSE controller 216 will recognize the PD as a valid PoE device, and be able to classify its power requirements.
- FIG. 2 also illustrates a signature resistor 248 and a classification resistor 250 connected to PD 106 .
- Signature resistor 248 is used to validate the PD 106
- the classification resistor 250 is used for classifying PD 106 and to limit current for classification.
- a direct current (IDC) 238 flows from the PSE Controller 216 through the first center tap 210 , and divides into a first current (I 1 ) 240 and a second current (I 2 ) 242 that are carried over conductor pair 104 .
- the first current (I 1 ) 240 and the second current (I 2 ) 242 then recombine at the third center tap 222 to reform the direct current (IDC) 238 so as to power PD 106 .
- the direct current (IDC) 238 flows from PD 106 through the fourth center tap 226 , and divides for transport over conductor pair 110 .
- the return DC current recombines at the second center tap 214 , and returns to the DC power supply 218 .
- a first communication signal 244 and/or a second communication signal 246 are simultaneously differentially carried via the conductor pairs 104 and 110 between the transceivers or PHY of PSE 102 and the PD 106 .
- the communication signals 244 and 246 are differential signals that ideally are not effected by the DC power transfer described above.
- the signaling used by the PSE controller is based on common mode signaling so it does not interfere with data transmission.
- PSE 102 In order to conduct its management and control of PD 106 , PSE 102 analyzes certain characteristics of PD 106 , and the system as a whole, based on measurements taken at PD 106 . Based on those characteristics, PSE 102 can determine certain attributes of PD 106 as well as attributes of the system. Example attributes determined by PSE 102 can include, but are not limited to, the following: valid device detection, power classification, AC disconnect information, short circuit detection, PD load variations, various current measurements, overload conditions, and inrush conditions.
- PoE Power Over Ethernet
- IEEE compliant PoE systems One problem that is encountered in supporting increased length IEEE compliant PoE systems includes the increased resistance of the Ethernet cable (e.g., a CAT-5 cable) that connects the PSE and the PD.
- IEEE compliant PSEs are designed to operate with a CAT-5 cable having a maximum length of approximately 100 meters.
- IEEE compliant PSEs are designed to compensate for a maximum cable resistance of approximately 20 Ohms when supporting IEEE compliant PDs in current PoE systems. This compensation includes compensating for the voltage drops that could occur across the 20 Ohms resistance during each of the different operational phases (e.g., detection, classification, etc.) of the PoE system.
- FIGS. 3-6 Examples of modification of PSE systems rules according to an embodiment of the present invention will now be described with respect to FIGS. 3-6 . These examples are provided with respect to two exemplary PoE embodiments having increased cable length of 350 and 500 meters, respectively. These examples are provided for the purpose of illustration and are not limiting of the scope of the present invention. As would be understood by a person skilled in the art based on the teachings herein, these examples can be extended to support PoE systems having any cable length up to a maximum supported by the PSE process or different load currents as will be specified by IEEE 802.3af.
- FIG. 3 illustrates PSE classification voltage ranges for the two exemplary PoE embodiments with increased cable length.
- FIG. 3 also illustrates the required PSE classification voltage range in a typical IEEE compliant PoE system. This range according to IEEE 802.3af should be between a minimum of 15.5 volts and a maximum of 20.5 volts. It is noted that this required classification voltage range is specified based on a maximum cable length of 100 meters (or equivalently a 20 Ohms resistance) to provide valid classification voltages at the PD (typically, a valid classification voltage at the PD is between 14.5 volts and 20.5 volts).
- the PSE classification voltage range needs to be modified to compensate for the increased cable resistance.
- this includes increasing the minimum end of the classification voltage range according to the maximum possible added voltage drop due to the increase in cable resistance. In other words, this includes increasing the minimum end of the classification voltage range by the added voltage drop due to the maximum possible current during the classification phase of an IEEE compliant PoE system.
- Table 33-4 (not shown) of the IEEE 802.3af standard specifies the maximum current during classification to be equal to 51 milliamps in a PoE system that supports PDs of class 0 to 4. Accordingly, the resulting classification voltage ranges for the exemplary PoE systems with cable length of 350 and 500 meters are as shown in FIG. 3 .
- the minimum end of the classification voltage range at the PSE is equal to 14.5+(51 milliamps ⁇ 70 Ohms) ⁇ 18.07 volts, to provide the proper voltage at the PD.
- the minimum end of the classification voltage range at the PSE is equal to 14.5+(51 milliamps ⁇ 100 Ohms) ⁇ 19.6 volts, to provide the proper voltage at the PD.
- classification in increased length PoE systems remain substantially similar to classification in current PoE systems.
- the classification phase duration remains as specified in IEEE 802.3af (less than or equal to 75 milliseconds).
- the classification current limit (less than or equal to 100 milliamps) remains as specified in IEEE 802.3af.
- the detection phase remains as specified in IEEE 802.3af, with the increased cable resistance added to the PD resistor signature and compensated for at the PSE.
- FIG. 5 illustrates PSE post start up voltage ranges for the two exemplary PoE embodiments with increased cable length.
- FIG. 5 also illustrates the required PSE post start up voltage range in a typical IEEE compliant PoE system. This range according to IEEE 802.3af should be between a minimum of 44 volts and a maximum of 57 volts. As illustrated, this required post start up voltage range is specified based on a maximum cable length of 100 meters (or equivalently a 20 Ohms resistance) to provide valid post start up voltages at the PD (typically, a valid post start up voltage at the PD is between 36 volts and 57 volts).
- the minimum end of the PSE post start up voltage range is increased according to the maximum possible added voltage drop due to the increase in cable resistance. This includes increasing the minimum end of the post start up voltage range by the added voltage drop due to the maximum possible current during the post start up phase of an IEEE compliant PoE system. As would be understood by a person skilled in the art based on the teachings herein, increasing the PSE post start up voltage range is only possible up to the maximum sustainable voltage of the PSE process. For example, current IEEE compliant PSE processes are required to sustain up to 57 volts. However, PSEs with higher voltage process can be designed.
- IEEE 802.3af specifies the maximum load current during post start up to be equal to 350 milliamps and an in-rush current of 400 milliamps. Accordingly, the resulting PSE post start up voltage ranges are as shown in FIG. 5 .
- FIG. 6 illustrates required PSE power requirements and cable power loss in example increased length PoE systems.
- PSE IEEE compliance requirements to enable increased length PoE systems.
- similar PSE compliance requirements can be created for increased length PoE systems that comply with legacy PoE standards.
- These PSE compliance requirements ensure that valid port voltages are received at the PD in view of the maximum possible cable current.
- the PD process will need to be able to support the increased PSE voltage ranges at all times (regardless of the value of the cable current). This problem will be illustrated with respect to FIGS. 7 and 8 .
- FIG. 7 illustrates an IEEE compliant PoE system 700 .
- PoE system 700 includes an IEEE compliant PSE 702 and an IEEE compliant PD 704 , connected by a CAT-5 cable 706 having a length of 100 meters.
- PSE 702 is required to support a minimum port voltage of 44 volts to enable a minimum port voltage of 36 volts at PD 704 (a drop of approximately 1 volt occurs across a diode prior to the PD input port).
- the required maximum PSE port voltage is only 57 volts, which is also approximately the maximum voltage supported by current IEEE compliant PD processes. As such, notwithstanding the value of the cable current (or equivalently the voltage drop across cable 706 ), the PD port voltage will always be within an allowable maximum voltage of the PD process.
- FIG. 8 illustrates an example increased length PoE system 800 .
- PoE system 800 includes a PSE 802 and PD 804 , connected by a CAT-5 cable 806 having a length of 500 meters.
- PSE 802 is enabled to support increased cable length up to 500 meters. For example, PSE 802 supports a minimum port voltage of 76 volts during the start up phase to provide a minimum port voltage of 36 volts at PD 804 (a maximum voltage drop of 40 volts occurs across cable 806 ).
- PD 804 is an IEEE compliant PD with a typical process that supports voltages up to 57 volts.
- the minimum supported port voltage at PSE 802 (76 volts) is greater than the maximum supported voltage of the PD process (57 volts). Based on that, if the voltage drop across cable 806 is less than 19 volts (or equivalently the cable current is less than 190 milliamps), the port voltage at PD 804 will exceed the maximum supported operating voltage and PD 804 can be damaged. In practice, this could happen during start up before PD 804 is fully loaded to draw the maximum cable current of 350 milliamps, or if PD 804 requires less than 7 Watts during start up.
- the protection may be necessary if (a) PD in-rush current is ⁇ 400 mA; or (b) PD load current is ⁇ 190 mA.
- One solution is to design the PD chip such that it is capable of tolerating higher port voltages that are at least equal to the minimum supported PSE port voltage. In example system 800 , this implies that the PD should be able to support voltages up to 76 volts.
- FIG. 9 illustrates an example powered device (PD) chip 900 usable in an increased length PoE system.
- Example PD chip 900 includes a plurality of circuits 902 , 904 , 906 , and 908 and a Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) Controller 910 .
- PWM Pulse Width Modulation
- Circuits 902 , 904 , 906 , and 908 are each connected to a port voltage V port 912 of PD chip 900 . Each of these circuits 902 , 904 , 906 , and 908 is triggered when V port 912 is within the voltage range associated with it. For example, circuit 902 is triggered when V port 912 is within the voltage range of 2.7-10.1 volts to connect V port 912 through resistor R detect 914 to the ground terminal. Similarly, circuit 904 is triggered when V port 912 is within the voltage range of 11-20.5 volts to connect V port 912 through resistor R class 916 to the ground terminal.
- Circuits 902 and 904 are used during the detection phase and the classification phase, respectively, which occur prior to power transfer in a PoE system.
- R detect 914 and R class 916 correspond respectively to the signature resistor and the classification resistor of PD chip 900 .
- R detect 914 and R class 916 are shown as implemented externally to PD chip 900 . In other embodiments, R detect 914 and R class 916 can be integrated within PD chip 900 .
- Circuit 906 is used for the start up phase in PoE system 900 .
- V port 912 is between 36 volts and a maximum of 57 volts during the start up phase.
- IEEE 802.3af specifies a minimum PD shut down voltage of 30 volts, i.e., the PD chip must shut down if V port 912 is approximately 30 volts and falling.
- IEEE 802.3af specifies a maximum PD turn on voltage of 42 volts, i.e., the PD must turn on at this voltage.
- circuit 906 When triggered, circuit 906 connects V port 912 through a Hot Swap MOSFET 920 to a PD load (not shown in FIG. 9 ).
- Hot Swap MOSFET 920 can be implemented within or outside PD chip 900 .
- circuits 902 , 904 , and 906 are sufficient for safe PD operation. This is because V port 912 cannot exceed 57 volts, and consequently no precautions are needed to deal with V port 912 levels higher than 57 volts. This does not take transients into considerations. However, as described above, in increased length PoE systems, such precautions will be needed unless the PD process is designed to support higher voltages.
- a clamping circuit which is formed by circuit 908 , a MOSFET 922 , and a resistor R LoadBR 918 .
- the clamping circuit operates to clamp V port 912 to cause it to remain within the supported PD voltage range ( ⁇ 57 volts). In other words, the clamping circuit connect a dummy load when V port >57 volts.
- the clamping circuit can be implemented within the PD chip, or alternatively, it can be implemented outside the PD chip. Note that different values of R LoadBR 918 can be used for different power classes of PDs.
- An example implementation of the clamping circuit can be in the form of a dongle. The dongle can be used to enhance existing IEEE compliant PDs so that they can support increased cable length PSE controllers.
- An example implementation 1100 of a voltage clamping circuit within a dongle is illustrated in FIG. 11 .
- FIG. 10 illustrates an example implementation 1000 of a clamping circuit.
- Example clamping circuit 1000 is an external clamping circuit implementation, which can be used with current IEEE compliant PD chips to enable them for use in increased length PoE systems.
- example implementation 1000 can also be readily implemented within a PD chip, as illustrated in FIG. 9 , to provide an increased length IEEE compliant PD chip.
- Example clamping circuit 1000 includes a first diode 1002 , a second diode 1004 , resistors 1006 , 1008 , and 1010 , a capacitor 1012 , and an n-channel MOSFET transistor 1014 .
- Diode 1002 is a Zener diode having a Zener voltage of approximately 56 volts. Accordingly, current would flow in the reverse direction (from the cathode to the anode) through diode 1002 only when the voltage across diode 1002 (measured from the cathode to the anode) reaches 56 volts. The voltage across diode 1002 (measured from the cathode to the anode) cannot exceed 56 volts.
- diode 1004 is a Zener diode having a Zener voltage of approximately 20 volts. Reverse current would flow though diode 1004 only when the voltage across diode 1004 (measured from the cathode to the anode) reaches 20 volts. The voltage across diode 1004 (measured from the cathode to the anode) cannot exceed 20 volts.
- Clamping circuit 1000 operates as will now be described with respect to FIG. 10 .
- MOSFET 1014 When the received PSE voltage is less than 56 volts, no current flows through diode 1002 . As such, assuming capacitor 1012 is initially uncharged, the gate-to-source voltage of MOSFET 1014 will be less than the threshold voltage V t of MOSFET 1014 . MOSFET 1014 will thus be operating in cut-off state, thereby acting as an open circuit. Accordingly, the received PSE voltage will be directly coupled to the PD load (not shown in FIG. 10 ).
- resistor 1010 and MOSFET 1014 When the voltage across capacitor 1012 reaches or exceeds the threshold voltage V t of MOSFET 1014 , current will start to flow through MOSFET 1014 .
- resistance in the path formed by resistor 1010 and MOSFET 1014 will be much lower than the resistance in the path formed by diode 1002 , resistor 1006 , and resistor 1008 , and the bulk of the current received from the PSE will flow through resistor 1010 and MOSFET 1014 . Only a very low current therefore will flow through diode 1002 , resistor 1006 , and resistor 1008 , causing the voltage across that path to be just higher than 56 volts and clamping the voltage provided to the PD load.
- FIG. 10 provides an example operation snapshot of clamping circuit 1000 when the received PSE voltage is equal to 70 volts.
- the shown example assumes a cable length of 350 meters having a resistance of approximately 70.5 Ohms.
- Resistors 1006 , 1008 , and 1010 have values of 51 KOhms, 240 KOhms, and 220 Ohms, respectively, and capacitor 1012 has a value of 100 nanoFarads.
- the PD voltage is clamped to approximately 58 volts. Note that the value of resistor 1010 will depend upon the power class of the PD and therefore can be adjusted accordingly.
- example clamping circuit 1000 is provided herein for the purpose of illustration. As such, components and/or component values used in example clamping circuit 1000 are only exemplary. Equivalent clamping circuits, as would be appreciated by a person skilled in the art based on the teachings herein, can alternatively be used and are also within the scope of embodiments of the present invention. Further, example clamping circuit 1000 can be designed with configurable and/or variable components and/or component values. As such, example clamping circuit 1000 can be configured according to, among other parameters, the maximum supported PD voltage and/or the cable length of the PoE system.
- PSEs enabled for increased length PoE compensate for cable voltage drop in their outputs.
- port voltages at the PD will always be within expected IEEE compliant port voltage ranges.
- port voltages at the PD can be lower than the expected IEEE compliant port voltage ranges. As such, modifications of some of the port voltage ranges may be required in increased length PDs.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Dc Digital Transmission (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/924,141, filed May 1, 2007 (Atty. Docket No. 2875.1540000), which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
- The present application is related to U.S. patent application No. TBA (Atty. Docket No. 2875.1700001), which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/929,352, filed Jun. 22, 2007 (Atty. Docket No. 2875.1700000), which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates generally to Power over Ethernet (PoE), and more particularly to PoE with increased cable lengths.
- 2. Background Art
- Ethernet communications provide high speed communications between data terminals.
- Power over Ethernet (PoE) systems enable power transmission over the same transmission lines that carry data in an Ethernet. Generally, power is generated at a Power Source Equipment (PSE) side of the PoE system and is carried over the data transmission lines to a Powered Device (PD) side of the PoE System.
- A PSE controller is typically used at the PSE side to enable power management functions of the PD. For example, a PSE controller may be used to detect whether a valid PD device is active and to manage power flow to the PD. Further, at either side of a PoE system, a transceiver physical layer (PHY) is available to transmit and receive data over the transmission lines.
- Current IEEE compliant PoE systems support cable lengths up to approximately 100 meters only. There is a need therefore for improved PoE systems that support greater cable lengths.
- Increased cable length Power over Ethernet (PoE) methods and systems are provided herein.
- Embodiments can be designed for compliance with IEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.3at, or legacy PoE standards.
- Embodiments include PSE controller designs enabled for increased length PoE, which require minimal or no modification of existing PD designs.
- Embodiments include example modifications of IEEE 802.3af PSE system rules revised for increased cable length applications, including example modifications of PSE port voltage ranges to support IEEE 802.3af compliant PDs across increased cable lengths.
- Embodiments include PDs having increased voltage process and/or added voltage protection circuitry to support increased length PoE.
- Further embodiments, features, and advantages of the present invention, as well as the structure and operation of the various embodiments of the present invention, are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
- The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and form a part of the specification, illustrate the present invention and, together with the description, further serve to explain the principles of the invention and to enable a person skilled in the pertinent art to make and use the invention.
-
FIG. 1 is an overview of a Power over Ethernet (PoE) system. -
FIG. 2 is a more detailed view of a PoE system. -
FIG. 3 illustrates required PSE classification voltage ranges in example increased length PoE systems. -
FIG. 4 illustrates required PSE classification voltage ranges in example increased length PoE systems. -
FIG. 5 illustrates required PSE post start up voltage ranges in example increased length PoE systems. -
FIG. 6 illustrates required PSE power requirements and cable power loss in example increased length PoE systems. -
FIG. 7 illustrates an IEEE compliant PoE system. -
FIG. 8 illustrates an example increased length PoE system. -
FIG. 9 illustrates an example powered device (PD) chip usable in an increased length PoE system. -
FIG. 10 illustrates an example implementation of a clamping circuit that can be used within the example PD chip ofFIG. 8 . -
FIG. 11 illustrates an example implementation of a clamping circuit by means of a dongle. - The present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. Generally, the drawing in which an element first appears is typically indicated by the leftmost digit(s) in the corresponding reference number.
- Current IEEE 802.3af compliant PoE systems support cable lengths up to approximately 100 meters only. There is a need therefore for improved PoE systems that support greater cable lengths.
- Increased cable length Power over Ethernet (PoE) methods and systems are provided herein. Embodiments can be designed for compliance with IEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.3 at, and/or legacy PoE standards. Embodiments include PSE and PD designs enabled for increased length PoE.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates a high level diagram of a conventional Power over Ethernet (PoE)system 100 that provides DC power over a common data communications medium. Referring toFIG. 1 ,power source equipment 102 provides DC power overconductors electrical load 108. Accordingly, the power transfer between thePSE 102 and thePD 106 occurs simultaneously with the exchange of high speed data over theconductors PSE 102 when used with a switching and PHY chip is a data switch having multiple ports that is communicating with one or more PD devices, such as Internet phones, wireless access points, etc. - The conductor pairs 104 and 110 can carry high speed differential data communications. In one example, the conductor pairs 104 and 110 each include one or more twisted wire pairs, or any other type of cable or communications media capable of carrying the data transmissions and DC power transmissions between the PSE and PD. In Ethernet communications, the
conductor pairs -
FIG. 2 provides a more detailed circuit diagram of thePoE system 100, wherePSE 102 provides DC power toPD 106 overconductor pairs PSE 102 includes a transceiver physical layer device (or PHY) 202 having full duplex transmit and receive capability throughdifferential transmit port 204 anddifferential receive port 206. (Herein, transceivers may be referred to as PHYs.) Afirst transformer 208 couples high speed data between thetransmit port 204 and thefirst conductor pair 104. Likewise, asecond transformer 212 couples high speed data between thereceive port 206 and thesecond conductor pair 110. Therespective transformers transceiver 202, but isolate any low frequency or DC voltage from the transceiver ports, which may be sensitive to large voltage values. - The
first transformer 208 includes primary and secondary windings, where the secondary winding (on the conductor side) includes acenter tap 210. Likewise, thesecond transformer 212 includes primary and secondary windings, where the secondary winding (on the conductor side) includes acenter tap 214. The DC output voltage is applied across the respective center taps (e.g. 210, 214) of thetransformers DC supply 218 is 48 volts, but other voltages could be used depending on the voltage/power requirements of thePD 106. - The
PSE 102 further includes aPSE controller 216 which performs the power management functions based on the dynamic needs of thePD 106. More specifically, thePSE controller 216 measures the voltage, current, and temperature, etc so as to characterize the power requirements of thePD 106. - Further, the
PSE controller 216 detects and validates a compatible PD, determines a power classification signature for the validated PD, supplies power to the PD, monitors the power, and reduces or removes the power from the PD when the power is no longer requested or required. During detection, if the PSE finds the PD to be non-compatible, the PSE can prevent the application of power to that PD device, protecting the PD from possible damage. The IEEE has imposed standards on the detection, power classification, and monitoring of a PD by a PSE in the IEEE 802.3 μm standard, which is incorporated herein by reference. - Still referring to
FIG. 2 , the contents and functionality of thePD 106 will now be discussed. ThePD 106 side includes a transceiverphysical layer device 219 having full duplex transmit and receive capability through differential transmitport 236 and differential receiveport 234. Athird transformer 220 couples high speed data between thefirst conductor pair 104 and the receiveport 234. Likewise, afourth transformer 224 couples high speed data between the transmitport 236 and thesecond conductor pair 110. Therespective transformers transceiver 219, but isolate any low frequency or DC voltage from the sensitive transceiver data ports. - The
third transformer 220 includes primary and secondary windings, where the secondary winding (on the conductor side) includes acenter tap 222. Likewise, thefourth transformer 224 includes primary and secondary windings, where the secondary winding (on the conductor side) includes acenter tap 226. The center taps 222 and 226 supply the DC power carried overconductors representative load 108 of thePD 106, where theload 108 represents the dynamic power draw needed to operatePD 106. A DC-DC converter 230 may be optionally inserted before theload 108 to step down the voltage as necessary to meet the voltage requirements of thePD 106. Further, multiple DC-DC converters 230 may be arrayed in parallel to output multiple different voltages (e.g. 3 volts, 5 volts, 12 volts) to supplydifferent loads 108 of thePD 106. - The
PD 106 further includes aPD controller 228 that monitors the voltage and current on the PD side of the PoE configuration. ThePD controller 228 further provides the necessary impedance signatures on thereturn conductor 110 during initialization, so that thePSE controller 216 will recognize the PD as a valid PoE device, and be able to classify its power requirements.FIG. 2 also illustrates asignature resistor 248 and aclassification resistor 250 connected toPD 106.Signature resistor 248 is used to validate thePD 106, and theclassification resistor 250 is used for classifyingPD 106 and to limit current for classification. - During ideal operation, a direct current (IDC) 238 flows from the
PSE Controller 216 through thefirst center tap 210, and divides into a first current (I1) 240 and a second current (I2) 242 that are carried overconductor pair 104. The first current (I1) 240 and the second current (I2) 242 then recombine at thethird center tap 222 to reform the direct current (IDC) 238 so as to powerPD 106. On return, the direct current (IDC) 238 flows fromPD 106 through thefourth center tap 226, and divides for transport overconductor pair 110. The return DC current recombines at thesecond center tap 214, and returns to theDC power supply 218. - As discussed above, data transmission between the
PSE 102 and thePD 106 occurs simultaneously with the power as described above. Accordingly, afirst communication signal 244 and/or asecond communication signal 246 are simultaneously differentially carried via the conductor pairs 104 and 110 between the transceivers or PHY ofPSE 102 and thePD 106. It is important to note that the communication signals 244 and 246 are differential signals that ideally are not effected by the DC power transfer described above. However, the signaling used by the PSE controller is based on common mode signaling so it does not interfere with data transmission. - In order to conduct its management and control of
PD 106,PSE 102 analyzes certain characteristics ofPD 106, and the system as a whole, based on measurements taken atPD 106. Based on those characteristics,PSE 102 can determine certain attributes ofPD 106 as well as attributes of the system. Example attributes determined byPSE 102 can include, but are not limited to, the following: valid device detection, power classification, AC disconnect information, short circuit detection, PD load variations, various current measurements, overload conditions, and inrush conditions. - Current IEEE compliant PoE systems support cable lengths up to approximately 100 meters only. As such, to support greater cable lengths, modified PSE and PD interfaces are needed.
- In the teachings herein, several example embodiments for enabling increased length PoE systems are provided. These embodiments are provided for the purpose of illustration and are not limiting of the scope of the present invention. Further, embodiments will be described with respect to IEEE compliant systems (e.g., IEEE 802.3af and IEEE 802.3 at). However, embodiments of the present invention are not limited to IEEE compliant systems and can be extended to legacy PoE systems having their own defined system rules.
- One problem that is encountered in supporting increased length IEEE compliant PoE systems includes the increased resistance of the Ethernet cable (e.g., a CAT-5 cable) that connects the PSE and the PD. Indeed, IEEE compliant PSEs are designed to operate with a CAT-5 cable having a maximum length of approximately 100 meters. As such, IEEE compliant PSEs are designed to compensate for a maximum cable resistance of approximately 20 Ohms when supporting IEEE compliant PDs in current PoE systems. This compensation includes compensating for the voltage drops that could occur across the 20 Ohms resistance during each of the different operational phases (e.g., detection, classification, etc.) of the PoE system.
- Accordingly, when the cable length (and correspondingly the cable resistance) is increased, compliance with IEEE requires modification of system rules at the PSE to enable the same operational voltages at the PD.
- Examples of modification of PSE systems rules according to an embodiment of the present invention will now be described with respect to
FIGS. 3-6 . These examples are provided with respect to two exemplary PoE embodiments having increased cable length of 350 and 500 meters, respectively. These examples are provided for the purpose of illustration and are not limiting of the scope of the present invention. As would be understood by a person skilled in the art based on the teachings herein, these examples can be extended to support PoE systems having any cable length up to a maximum supported by the PSE process or different load currents as will be specified by IEEE 802.3af. -
FIG. 3 illustrates PSE classification voltage ranges for the two exemplary PoE embodiments with increased cable length.FIG. 3 also illustrates the required PSE classification voltage range in a typical IEEE compliant PoE system. This range according to IEEE 802.3af should be between a minimum of 15.5 volts and a maximum of 20.5 volts. It is noted that this required classification voltage range is specified based on a maximum cable length of 100 meters (or equivalently a 20 Ohms resistance) to provide valid classification voltages at the PD (typically, a valid classification voltage at the PD is between 14.5 volts and 20.5 volts). - As such, when the cable length is increased, the PSE classification voltage range needs to be modified to compensate for the increased cable resistance. In an embodiment, this includes increasing the minimum end of the classification voltage range according to the maximum possible added voltage drop due to the increase in cable resistance. In other words, this includes increasing the minimum end of the classification voltage range by the added voltage drop due to the maximum possible current during the classification phase of an IEEE compliant PoE system.
- Table 33-4 (not shown) of the IEEE 802.3af standard specifies the maximum current during classification to be equal to 51 milliamps in a PoE system that supports PDs of class 0 to 4. Accordingly, the resulting classification voltage ranges for the exemplary PoE systems with cable length of 350 and 500 meters are as shown in
FIG. 3 . For example, for a cable length of 350 meters, the minimum end of the classification voltage range at the PSE is equal to 14.5+(51 milliamps×70 Ohms)≈18.07 volts, to provide the proper voltage at the PD. Similarly, for a cable length of 500 meters, the minimum end of the classification voltage range at the PSE is equal to 14.5+(51 milliamps×100 Ohms)≈19.6 volts, to provide the proper voltage at the PD. - It is noted, however, that current IEEE compliant PoE systems do not allow the usage of PDs of class 4, which is specified as “reserved” in the IEEE 802.3af standard. To be IEEE 802.3af compliant a PSE therefore only requires support of PDs of class 0 to 3. As such, the maximum current during classification with respect to which added voltage drops need to be calculated is only 35 milliamps, instead of 51 milliamps when class 4 is used. Based on that, compliance with IEEE can also be achieved using the PSE classification voltage ranges illustrated in
FIG. 4 , which are calculated according to a maximum current during classification of 35 milliamps. - It is noted that in other aspects classification in increased length PoE systems remain substantially similar to classification in current PoE systems. For example, the classification phase duration remains as specified in IEEE 802.3af (less than or equal to 75 milliseconds). Also, the classification current limit (less than or equal to 100 milliamps) remains as specified in IEEE 802.3af. Similarly, the detection phase remains as specified in IEEE 802.3af, with the increased cable resistance added to the PD resistor signature and compensated for at the PSE.
- As with classification voltage ranges, however, post start up voltage ranges need to be modified to enable increased cable length IEEE compliant PSEs.
FIG. 5 illustrates PSE post start up voltage ranges for the two exemplary PoE embodiments with increased cable length.FIG. 5 also illustrates the required PSE post start up voltage range in a typical IEEE compliant PoE system. This range according to IEEE 802.3af should be between a minimum of 44 volts and a maximum of 57 volts. As illustrated, this required post start up voltage range is specified based on a maximum cable length of 100 meters (or equivalently a 20 Ohms resistance) to provide valid post start up voltages at the PD (typically, a valid post start up voltage at the PD is between 36 volts and 57 volts). - In an embodiment, the minimum end of the PSE post start up voltage range is increased according to the maximum possible added voltage drop due to the increase in cable resistance. This includes increasing the minimum end of the post start up voltage range by the added voltage drop due to the maximum possible current during the post start up phase of an IEEE compliant PoE system. As would be understood by a person skilled in the art based on the teachings herein, increasing the PSE post start up voltage range is only possible up to the maximum sustainable voltage of the PSE process. For example, current IEEE compliant PSE processes are required to sustain up to 57 volts. However, PSEs with higher voltage process can be designed.
- IEEE 802.3af specifies the maximum load current during post start up to be equal to 350 milliamps and an in-rush current of 400 milliamps. Accordingly, the resulting PSE post start up voltage ranges are as shown in
FIG. 5 . For example, for a cable length of 350 meters, the minimum end of the start up voltage range is equal to 36+(400 milliamps×70 Ohms)=64 volts, where 36 volts is the minimum port voltage at the PD side. Similarly, for a cable length of 500 meters, the minimum end of the start up voltage range is equal to 36+(400 milliamps×100 Ohms)=76 volts. These exemplary PSE start up voltage ranges guarantee valid post start up port voltages at the PD. - In addition to ensuring valid port voltages at the PD, IEEE compliance also necessitates compliance with power requirements at the PD. IEEE 802.3af specifies a maximum power level of 12.95 Watts at the PD for PDs of class 0 to 3. With a cable length of 100 meters, this implies that the PSE should be able to support 15.4 Watts, as approximately a maximum of 2.45 Watts could dissipate in the cable (7 volts×350 milliamps=2.45 Watts) due to cable resistance.
- With greater cable length, larger power dissipation in the cable will occur. Consequently, the PSE will be required to support greater power outputs. This is shown in
FIG. 6 , which illustrates required PSE power requirements and cable power loss in example increased length PoE systems. For example, for a cable length of 350 meters, the PSE will be required to support 21.52 Watts as a maximum of 8.57 Watts (24.5 volts×350 milliamps=8.57 Watts) could dissipate in the cable. Similarly, for a cable length of 500 meters, the PSE will be required to support 25.2 Watts as a maximum of 12.25 Watts (35 volts×350 milliamps=12.25 Watts) could dissipate in the cable due to cable resistance. - Note that similar cable power loss figures (8.57 Watts and 12.25 Watts) as above are currently being studied by IEEE 802.3 at task force in approving a cable plant that proposes supporting up to 720 milliamps, which approximates a cable loss of 10.3 Watts for a cable of
length 100 meters. - The above described example embodiments describe PSE IEEE compliance requirements to enable increased length PoE systems. As noted above, similar PSE compliance requirements can be created for increased length PoE systems that comply with legacy PoE standards. These PSE compliance requirements ensure that valid port voltages are received at the PD in view of the maximum possible cable current. However, to fully enable increased length PoE systems, the PD process will need to be able to support the increased PSE voltage ranges at all times (regardless of the value of the cable current). This problem will be illustrated with respect to
FIGS. 7 and 8 . -
FIG. 7 illustrates an IEEEcompliant PoE system 700.PoE system 700 includes an IEEEcompliant PSE 702 and an IEEEcompliant PD 704, connected by a CAT-5cable 706 having a length of 100 meters. - A maximum compliant current of 350 milliamps is allowed over
cable 706 during the post start up phase. As such, a maximum voltage drop of 7 volts can occur overcable 706. Accordingly,PSE 702 is required to support a minimum port voltage of 44 volts to enable a minimum port voltage of 36 volts at PD 704 (a drop of approximately 1 volt occurs across a diode prior to the PD input port). - Note, however, that the required maximum PSE port voltage is only 57 volts, which is also approximately the maximum voltage supported by current IEEE compliant PD processes. As such, notwithstanding the value of the cable current (or equivalently the voltage drop across cable 706), the PD port voltage will always be within an allowable maximum voltage of the PD process.
-
FIG. 8 illustrates an example increasedlength PoE system 800.PoE system 800 includes aPSE 802 andPD 804, connected by a CAT-5cable 806 having a length of 500 meters. -
PSE 802 is enabled to support increased cable length up to 500 meters. For example,PSE 802 supports a minimum port voltage of 76 volts during the start up phase to provide a minimum port voltage of 36 volts at PD 804 (a maximum voltage drop of 40 volts occurs across cable 806). -
PD 804 is an IEEE compliant PD with a typical process that supports voltages up to 57 volts. - Note that the minimum supported port voltage at PSE 802 (76 volts) is greater than the maximum supported voltage of the PD process (57 volts). Based on that, if the voltage drop across
cable 806 is less than 19 volts (or equivalently the cable current is less than 190 milliamps), the port voltage atPD 804 will exceed the maximum supported operating voltage andPD 804 can be damaged. In practice, this could happen during start up beforePD 804 is fully loaded to draw the maximum cable current of 350 milliamps, or ifPD 804 requires less than 7 Watts during start up. - Accordingly, there is a need to protect PDs from potentially non-tolerable port voltages in increased length PoE systems. The protection may be necessary if (a) PD in-rush current is <400 mA; or (b) PD load current is <190 mA.
- One solution is to design the PD chip such that it is capable of tolerating higher port voltages that are at least equal to the minimum supported PSE port voltage. In
example system 800, this implies that the PD should be able to support voltages up to 76 volts. - Another solution is to incorporate voltage clamping circuitry at the PD side such that PD port voltages are clamped down to within the supported PD voltage range whenever they exceed the maximum supported PD voltage. Example embodiments that implement this solution will now be described. These example embodiments are provided for the purpose of illustration and are not limiting of the scope of the present invention. As will be appreciated by a person skilled in the art based on the teachings herein, other embodiments to incorporate this or similar solutions are possible and are also within the scope of the present invention.
-
FIG. 9 illustrates an example powered device (PD)chip 900 usable in an increased length PoE system.Example PD chip 900 includes a plurality ofcircuits Controller 910. -
Circuits port voltage V port 912 ofPD chip 900. Each of thesecircuits V port 912 is within the voltage range associated with it. For example,circuit 902 is triggered whenV port 912 is within the voltage range of 2.7-10.1 volts to connectV port 912 throughresistor R detect 914 to the ground terminal. Similarly,circuit 904 is triggered whenV port 912 is within the voltage range of 11-20.5 volts to connectV port 912 throughresistor R class 916 to the ground terminal. -
Circuits R detect 914 andR class 916 correspond respectively to the signature resistor and the classification resistor ofPD chip 900. Inexample embodiment 900,R detect 914 andR class 916 are shown as implemented externally toPD chip 900. In other embodiments,R detect 914 andR class 916 can be integrated withinPD chip 900. -
Circuit 906 is used for the start up phase inPoE system 900. Typically, in normal operating conditions,V port 912 is between 36 volts and a maximum of 57 volts during the start up phase. IEEE 802.3af specifies a minimum PD shut down voltage of 30 volts, i.e., the PD chip must shut down ifV port 912 is approximately 30 volts and falling. Similarly, IEEE 802.3af specifies a maximum PD turn on voltage of 42 volts, i.e., the PD must turn on at this voltage. - When triggered,
circuit 906 connectsV port 912 through aHot Swap MOSFET 920 to a PD load (not shown inFIG. 9 ).Hot Swap MOSFET 920 can be implemented within oroutside PD chip 900. - In current IEEE compliant PoE systems having a cable length of 100 meters or less,
circuits V port 912 cannot exceed 57 volts, and consequently no precautions are needed to deal withV port 912 levels higher than 57 volts. This does not take transients into considerations. However, as described above, in increased length PoE systems, such precautions will be needed unless the PD process is designed to support higher voltages. - In
example embodiment 900, this is achieved using a clamping circuit, which is formed bycircuit 908, aMOSFET 922, and aresistor R LoadBR 918. The clamping circuit operates to clampV port 912 to cause it to remain within the supported PD voltage range (<57 volts). In other words, the clamping circuit connect a dummy load when Vport>57 volts. The clamping circuit can be implemented within the PD chip, or alternatively, it can be implemented outside the PD chip. Note that different values ofR LoadBR 918 can be used for different power classes of PDs. An example implementation of the clamping circuit can be in the form of a dongle. The dongle can be used to enhance existing IEEE compliant PDs so that they can support increased cable length PSE controllers. An example implementation 1100 of a voltage clamping circuit within a dongle is illustrated inFIG. 11 . -
FIG. 10 illustrates an example implementation 1000 of a clamping circuit. Example clamping circuit 1000 is an external clamping circuit implementation, which can be used with current IEEE compliant PD chips to enable them for use in increased length PoE systems. However, as would be appreciated by a person skilled in the art based on the teachings herein, example implementation 1000 can also be readily implemented within a PD chip, as illustrated inFIG. 9 , to provide an increased length IEEE compliant PD chip. - Example clamping circuit 1000 includes a
first diode 1002, asecond diode 1004,resistors capacitor 1012, and an n-channel MOSFET transistor 1014. -
Diode 1002 is a Zener diode having a Zener voltage of approximately 56 volts. Accordingly, current would flow in the reverse direction (from the cathode to the anode) throughdiode 1002 only when the voltage across diode 1002 (measured from the cathode to the anode) reaches 56 volts. The voltage across diode 1002 (measured from the cathode to the anode) cannot exceed 56 volts. Similarly,diode 1004 is a Zener diode having a Zener voltage of approximately 20 volts. Reverse current would flow thoughdiode 1004 only when the voltage across diode 1004 (measured from the cathode to the anode) reaches 20 volts. The voltage across diode 1004 (measured from the cathode to the anode) cannot exceed 20 volts. - Clamping circuit 1000 operates as will now be described with respect to
FIG. 10 . - When the received PSE voltage is less than 56 volts, no current flows through
diode 1002. As such, assumingcapacitor 1012 is initially uncharged, the gate-to-source voltage ofMOSFET 1014 will be less than the threshold voltage Vt ofMOSFET 1014.MOSFET 1014 will thus be operating in cut-off state, thereby acting as an open circuit. Accordingly, the received PSE voltage will be directly coupled to the PD load (not shown inFIG. 10 ). - As the received PSE voltage exceeds 56 volts, current begins to flow through
diode 1002 since the anode ofdiode 1002 initially sits at zero voltage. However, the current cannot flow (in the reverse direction) throughdiode 1004. Instead, the current will flow throughresistor 1008 and will cause a conduction current withincapacitor 1012, chargingcapacitor 1012. - When the voltage across
capacitor 1012 reaches or exceeds the threshold voltage Vt ofMOSFET 1014, current will start to flow throughMOSFET 1014. In an embodiment, resistance in the path formed byresistor 1010 andMOSFET 1014 will be much lower than the resistance in the path formed bydiode 1002,resistor 1006, andresistor 1008, and the bulk of the current received from the PSE will flow throughresistor 1010 andMOSFET 1014. Only a very low current therefore will flow throughdiode 1002,resistor 1006, andresistor 1008, causing the voltage across that path to be just higher than 56 volts and clamping the voltage provided to the PD load. -
FIG. 10 provides an example operation snapshot of clamping circuit 1000 when the received PSE voltage is equal to 70 volts. The shown example assumes a cable length of 350 meters having a resistance of approximately 70.5 Ohms. Resistors 1006, 1008, and 1010 have values of 51 KOhms, 240 KOhms, and 220 Ohms, respectively, andcapacitor 1012 has a value of 100 nanoFarads. As shown, the PD voltage is clamped to approximately 58 volts. Note that the value ofresistor 1010 will depend upon the power class of the PD and therefore can be adjusted accordingly. - As noted above, example clamping circuit 1000 is provided herein for the purpose of illustration. As such, components and/or component values used in example clamping circuit 1000 are only exemplary. Equivalent clamping circuits, as would be appreciated by a person skilled in the art based on the teachings herein, can alternatively be used and are also within the scope of embodiments of the present invention. Further, example clamping circuit 1000 can be designed with configurable and/or variable components and/or component values. As such, example clamping circuit 1000 can be configured according to, among other parameters, the maximum supported PD voltage and/or the cable length of the PoE system.
- Using the above described PD voltage clamping approach or by designing the PD chip to support higher port voltages, increased length PDs can be enabled. However, it is also necessary to ensure that increased length PDs operate properly with both current IEEE compliant PSEs and with PSEs enabled for increased length PoE. In other words, it is desirable that increased length PDs operate properly notwithstanding their knowledge of the type of PSE used.
- As described above, PSEs enabled for increased length PoE compensate for cable voltage drop in their outputs. As such, port voltages at the PD will always be within expected IEEE compliant port voltage ranges. On the other hand, if a current IEEE compliant PSE is used, port voltages at the PD can be lower than the expected IEEE compliant port voltage ranges. As such, modifications of some of the port voltage ranges may be required in increased length PDs.
- While various embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. It will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art that various changes in form and detail can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
Claims (19)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/984,621 US20080276104A1 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2007-11-20 | Power source equiment for power over ethernet system with increased cable length |
US12/830,919 US8030795B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2010-07-06 | Powered device for power over ethernet system with increased cable length |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US92414107P | 2007-05-01 | 2007-05-01 | |
US11/984,621 US20080276104A1 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2007-11-20 | Power source equiment for power over ethernet system with increased cable length |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/830,919 Continuation US8030795B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2010-07-06 | Powered device for power over ethernet system with increased cable length |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20080276104A1 true US20080276104A1 (en) | 2008-11-06 |
Family
ID=39940417
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/984,621 Abandoned US20080276104A1 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2007-11-20 | Power source equiment for power over ethernet system with increased cable length |
US12/830,919 Expired - Fee Related US8030795B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2010-07-06 | Powered device for power over ethernet system with increased cable length |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/830,919 Expired - Fee Related US8030795B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2010-07-06 | Powered device for power over ethernet system with increased cable length |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US20080276104A1 (en) |
Cited By (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070263622A1 (en) * | 2004-09-24 | 2007-11-15 | Jurgen Brieskorn | Communication System, Distribution Element and Network Device |
US20080315682A1 (en) * | 2007-06-22 | 2008-12-25 | Broadcom Corporation | Powered device for power over ethernet system with increased cable length |
US20090152943A1 (en) * | 2007-12-17 | 2009-06-18 | Wael William Diab | Method and system for vehicular power distribution utilizing power over ethernet |
US20100249952A1 (en) * | 2009-03-31 | 2010-09-30 | Schneider Electric/Square D Company | Direct Control of Devices Through a Programmable Controller Using Internet Protocol |
US20110004773A1 (en) * | 2007-05-01 | 2011-01-06 | Broadcom Corporation | Powered device for power over ethernet system with increased cable length |
US20110208361A1 (en) * | 2008-09-06 | 2011-08-25 | Hildebrand Stephen F | Motion control system with digital processing link |
US20120126612A1 (en) * | 2010-11-23 | 2012-05-24 | Broadcom Corporation | Ac-dc power supply unit and associated device |
US20130019113A1 (en) * | 2011-07-15 | 2013-01-17 | Renesas Electronics Corporation | Host device and terminal device, and communication system |
US20140136874A1 (en) * | 2012-11-15 | 2014-05-15 | Broadcom Corporation | Low latency discovery for power over ethernet |
EP2751951A4 (en) * | 2011-08-31 | 2015-08-19 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | Power drawn by network powered device |
US20160308683A1 (en) * | 2015-04-14 | 2016-10-20 | Broadcom Corporation | Power coupling circuits for single-pair ethernet with automotive applications |
US9935560B2 (en) | 2015-09-17 | 2018-04-03 | Stmicroelectronics S.R.L. | Electronic device with a maintain power signature (MPS) device and associated methods |
US10110387B2 (en) | 2013-06-27 | 2018-10-23 | Philips Lighting Holding B.V. | Powered device and power distribution system comprising the powered device |
US20190129485A1 (en) * | 2017-10-31 | 2019-05-02 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Power receiving apparatus, method of controlling power receiving apparatus, and storage medium |
US20210119813A1 (en) * | 2018-11-12 | 2021-04-22 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Control Method, Powered Device, and System |
Families Citing this family (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8261001B2 (en) * | 2009-04-27 | 2012-09-04 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Network range extender device |
CN103368748A (en) * | 2012-03-29 | 2013-10-23 | 苏州工业园区新宏博通讯科技有限公司 | Ethernet power supply output structure of wireless network protector |
US9535437B1 (en) * | 2012-10-15 | 2017-01-03 | Linear Technology Corporation | Power over ethernet power sourcing equipment provides low voltage output for increased efficiency in low power mode |
US10809134B2 (en) | 2017-05-24 | 2020-10-20 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Thermal modeling for cables transmitting data and power |
US11054457B2 (en) | 2017-05-24 | 2021-07-06 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Safety monitoring for cables transmitting data and power |
US10541758B2 (en) | 2017-09-18 | 2020-01-21 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Power delivery through an optical system |
US11431420B2 (en) | 2017-09-18 | 2022-08-30 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Power delivery through an optical system |
US11093012B2 (en) | 2018-03-02 | 2021-08-17 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Combined power, data, and cooling delivery in a communications network |
US10732688B2 (en) | 2018-03-09 | 2020-08-04 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Delivery of AC power with higher power PoE (power over ethernet) systems |
US10281513B1 (en) * | 2018-03-09 | 2019-05-07 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Verification of cable application and reduced load cable removal in power over communications systems |
US10631443B2 (en) | 2018-03-12 | 2020-04-21 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Splitting of combined delivery power, data, and cooling in a communications network |
US10958471B2 (en) | 2018-04-05 | 2021-03-23 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for detecting wire fault and electrical imbalance for power over communications cabling |
US10763749B2 (en) | 2018-11-14 | 2020-09-01 | Cisco Technology, Inc | Multi-resonant converter power supply |
US10680836B1 (en) | 2019-02-25 | 2020-06-09 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Virtualized chassis with power-over-Ethernet for networking applications |
US12126399B2 (en) | 2019-11-01 | 2024-10-22 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Fault managed power with dynamic and adaptive fault sensor |
US11063630B2 (en) | 2019-11-01 | 2021-07-13 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Initialization and synchronization for pulse power in a network system |
US11252811B2 (en) | 2020-01-15 | 2022-02-15 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Power distribution from point-of-load with cooling |
US11853138B2 (en) | 2020-01-17 | 2023-12-26 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Modular power controller |
US11088547B1 (en) | 2020-01-17 | 2021-08-10 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and system for integration and control of power for consumer power circuits |
US11438183B2 (en) | 2020-02-25 | 2022-09-06 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Power adapter for power supply unit |
US11637497B2 (en) | 2020-02-28 | 2023-04-25 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Multi-phase pulse power short reach distribution |
US11320610B2 (en) | 2020-04-07 | 2022-05-03 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Integration of power and optics through cold plate for delivery to electronic and photonic integrated circuits |
US11307368B2 (en) | 2020-04-07 | 2022-04-19 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Integration of power and optics through cold plates for delivery to electronic and photonic integrated circuits |
CN111901012A (en) * | 2020-07-23 | 2020-11-06 | 深圳市奥拓电子股份有限公司 | Ethernet communication module and electronic system for simultaneously transmitting two signals |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6125048A (en) * | 1998-12-28 | 2000-09-26 | Lucent Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for adjusting power delivered from a central power unit to a remote unit via a supply cable |
US20050132240A1 (en) * | 2003-12-16 | 2005-06-16 | Stineman John A.Jr. | Circuits and methods for detecting the presence of a powered device in a powered network |
US20050262364A1 (en) * | 2004-05-20 | 2005-11-24 | Diab Wael W | Methods and apparatus for provisioning phantom power to remote devices |
US7170194B2 (en) * | 2002-10-15 | 2007-01-30 | Powerdsine, Ltd. | Configurable multiple power source system |
US20080172564A1 (en) * | 2007-01-16 | 2008-07-17 | Broadcom Corporation | System and method for controlling a power budget at a power source equipment using a PHY |
US7404091B1 (en) * | 2005-03-22 | 2008-07-22 | Extreme Networks, Inc. | Methods, systems, and computer program products for managing power allocation to a device powered over a network communications cable based on a cable characteristic |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080276104A1 (en) * | 2007-05-01 | 2008-11-06 | Broadcom Corporation | Power source equiment for power over ethernet system with increased cable length |
US8026627B2 (en) * | 2007-06-22 | 2011-09-27 | Broadcom Corporation | Powered device for power over Ethernet system with increased cable length |
-
2007
- 2007-11-20 US US11/984,621 patent/US20080276104A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2010
- 2010-07-06 US US12/830,919 patent/US8030795B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6125048A (en) * | 1998-12-28 | 2000-09-26 | Lucent Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for adjusting power delivered from a central power unit to a remote unit via a supply cable |
US7170194B2 (en) * | 2002-10-15 | 2007-01-30 | Powerdsine, Ltd. | Configurable multiple power source system |
US20050132240A1 (en) * | 2003-12-16 | 2005-06-16 | Stineman John A.Jr. | Circuits and methods for detecting the presence of a powered device in a powered network |
US20050262364A1 (en) * | 2004-05-20 | 2005-11-24 | Diab Wael W | Methods and apparatus for provisioning phantom power to remote devices |
US7404091B1 (en) * | 2005-03-22 | 2008-07-22 | Extreme Networks, Inc. | Methods, systems, and computer program products for managing power allocation to a device powered over a network communications cable based on a cable characteristic |
US20080172564A1 (en) * | 2007-01-16 | 2008-07-17 | Broadcom Corporation | System and method for controlling a power budget at a power source equipment using a PHY |
Cited By (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070263622A1 (en) * | 2004-09-24 | 2007-11-15 | Jurgen Brieskorn | Communication System, Distribution Element and Network Device |
US7898107B2 (en) * | 2004-09-24 | 2011-03-01 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Communication system, distribution element and network device |
US8030795B2 (en) * | 2007-05-01 | 2011-10-04 | Broadcom Corporation | Powered device for power over ethernet system with increased cable length |
US20110004773A1 (en) * | 2007-05-01 | 2011-01-06 | Broadcom Corporation | Powered device for power over ethernet system with increased cable length |
US20080315682A1 (en) * | 2007-06-22 | 2008-12-25 | Broadcom Corporation | Powered device for power over ethernet system with increased cable length |
US8026627B2 (en) | 2007-06-22 | 2011-09-27 | Broadcom Corporation | Powered device for power over Ethernet system with increased cable length |
US20090152943A1 (en) * | 2007-12-17 | 2009-06-18 | Wael William Diab | Method and system for vehicular power distribution utilizing power over ethernet |
US20110208361A1 (en) * | 2008-09-06 | 2011-08-25 | Hildebrand Stephen F | Motion control system with digital processing link |
US20100249952A1 (en) * | 2009-03-31 | 2010-09-30 | Schneider Electric/Square D Company | Direct Control of Devices Through a Programmable Controller Using Internet Protocol |
US20120126612A1 (en) * | 2010-11-23 | 2012-05-24 | Broadcom Corporation | Ac-dc power supply unit and associated device |
US20130019113A1 (en) * | 2011-07-15 | 2013-01-17 | Renesas Electronics Corporation | Host device and terminal device, and communication system |
US9612640B2 (en) | 2011-07-15 | 2017-04-04 | Renesas Electronics Corporation | Host device and terminal device, and communication system |
US9229512B2 (en) * | 2011-07-15 | 2016-01-05 | Renesas Electronics Corporation | Host device and terminal device, and communication system |
EP2751951A4 (en) * | 2011-08-31 | 2015-08-19 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | Power drawn by network powered device |
US20140136874A1 (en) * | 2012-11-15 | 2014-05-15 | Broadcom Corporation | Low latency discovery for power over ethernet |
US10110387B2 (en) | 2013-06-27 | 2018-10-23 | Philips Lighting Holding B.V. | Powered device and power distribution system comprising the powered device |
US20160308683A1 (en) * | 2015-04-14 | 2016-10-20 | Broadcom Corporation | Power coupling circuits for single-pair ethernet with automotive applications |
US10135626B2 (en) * | 2015-04-14 | 2018-11-20 | Avago Technologies General Ip (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. | Power coupling circuits for single-pair ethernet with automotive applications |
US9935560B2 (en) | 2015-09-17 | 2018-04-03 | Stmicroelectronics S.R.L. | Electronic device with a maintain power signature (MPS) device and associated methods |
US10333423B2 (en) | 2015-09-17 | 2019-06-25 | Stmicroelectronics S.R.L. | Electronic device with a maintain power signature (MPS) device and associated methods |
US20190129485A1 (en) * | 2017-10-31 | 2019-05-02 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Power receiving apparatus, method of controlling power receiving apparatus, and storage medium |
US10908662B2 (en) * | 2017-10-31 | 2021-02-02 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Power receiving apparatus, method of controlling power receiving apparatus, and storage medium |
US20210119813A1 (en) * | 2018-11-12 | 2021-04-22 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Control Method, Powered Device, and System |
US11528154B2 (en) * | 2018-11-12 | 2022-12-13 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Control method, powered device, and system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20110004773A1 (en) | 2011-01-06 |
US8030795B2 (en) | 2011-10-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8030795B2 (en) | Powered device for power over ethernet system with increased cable length | |
US8026627B2 (en) | Powered device for power over Ethernet system with increased cable length | |
US8037324B2 (en) | Power over ethernet connector with integrated power source equipment (PSE) controller supporting high power applications | |
US8213141B2 (en) | Power over Ethernet electrostatic discharge protection circuit | |
US8205099B2 (en) | Power over Ethernet connector with integrated power source equipment (PSE) controller | |
US20080198635A1 (en) | Pulse width modulated ground/return for powered device | |
EP2008191B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for current sharing ethernet power across four conductor pairs using a midspan device | |
US7474704B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for current sharing ethernet power across four conductor pairs | |
US8341440B2 (en) | Power sharing between midspan and endspan for higher power PoE | |
US8279883B2 (en) | High speed isolation interface for PoE | |
US8397093B2 (en) | Physical separation and recognition mechanism for a switch and a power supply for power over ethernet (POE) in enterprise environments | |
US9092208B2 (en) | Device and method for powering Ethernet midspan device and endspan device | |
US20110026525A1 (en) | Ethernet Switch and System | |
EP1859566B1 (en) | Controlling power distribution among multiple wires in communication cable | |
US9036653B2 (en) | PoE communication bus, interface, and protocol between PoE subsystem and PHY or switch subsystems | |
WO2008073467A2 (en) | Network devices with solid state transformer that provides termination of open-drain transmit drivers of a physical layer module | |
US7500116B2 (en) | Method to control current imbalance between differential pairs providing a DC power feed | |
US8245056B2 (en) | Unified bus architecture for PoE communication and control | |
US8693496B2 (en) | Diode bridge configurations for increasing current in a distributed power network | |
EP1708409A2 (en) | Systems and methods operable to allow loop powering of networked devices | |
US20090051410A1 (en) | Integrated powered device (PD) and physical layer (PHY) chip | |
CN107294733B (en) | Power over Ethernet isolation device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BROADCOM CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HUSSAIN, ASIF;PANGULURI, SESHA T.;REEL/FRAME:020180/0622 Effective date: 20071107 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NORTH CAROLINA Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:BROADCOM CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:037806/0001 Effective date: 20160201 Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NORTH Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:BROADCOM CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:037806/0001 Effective date: 20160201 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., SINGAPORE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BROADCOM CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:041706/0001 Effective date: 20170120 Owner name: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BROADCOM CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:041706/0001 Effective date: 20170120 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BROADCOM CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:041712/0001 Effective date: 20170119 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED, SINGAPORE Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.;REEL/FRAME:047231/0369 Effective date: 20180509 Owner name: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITE Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.;REEL/FRAME:047231/0369 Effective date: 20180509 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITE Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE EXECUTION DATE OF THE MERGER AND APPLICATION NOS. 13/237,550 AND 16/103,107 FROM THE MERGER PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 047231 FRAME 0369. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE MERGER;ASSIGNOR:AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.;REEL/FRAME:048549/0113 Effective date: 20180905 Owner name: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED, SINGAPORE Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE EXECUTION DATE OF THE MERGER AND APPLICATION NOS. 13/237,550 AND 16/103,107 FROM THE MERGER PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 047231 FRAME 0369. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE MERGER;ASSIGNOR:AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.;REEL/FRAME:048549/0113 Effective date: 20180905 |