US20070294247A1

US20070294247A1 - Identifying optimal multi-scale patterns in time-series streams

Info

Publication number: US20070294247A1
Application number: US11/471,002
Authority: US
Inventors: Spyridon Papadimitriou; Philip S. Yu
Original assignee: International Business Machines Corp
Current assignee: International Business Machines Corp
Priority date: 2006-06-20
Filing date: 2006-06-20
Publication date: 2007-12-20
Also published as: US7945570B2; US20100063974A1

Abstract

A method, system, and computer readable medium for identifying local patterns in at least one time series data stream are disclosed. The method comprises generating multiple ordered levels of hierarchal approximation functions. The multiple ordered levels are generated directly from at least one given time series data stream including at least one set of time series data. The hierarchical approximation functions for each level of the multiple levels is based upon creating a set of approximating functions. The hierarchical approximation functions are also based upon selecting a current window with a current window length from a set of varying window lengths. The current window is selected for a current level of the multiple levels.

Description

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

This invention was made with Government support under Contract No.: H98230-05-3-0001 awarded by Intelligence Agencies. The Government has certain rights in this invention.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to the field of stream processing systems, and more particularly relates to identifying optimal local patterns in a data stream time series.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Data streams have recently received much attention in several communities (e.g., theory, databases, networks, data mining) because of several important applications (e.g., network traffic analysis, moving object tracking, financial data analysis, sensor monitoring, environmental monitoring, scientific data processing). Many recent efforts concentrate on summarization and pattern discovery in time series data streams. Some of these recent efforts are further described in (Y. Chen, G. Dong, J. Han, B. W. Wah, and J. Wang. Multi-dimensional regression analysis of time-series data streams. In VLDB, 2002; T. Palpanas, M. Vlachos, E. J. Keogh, D. Gunopulos, and W. Truppel. Online amnesic approximation of streaming time series. In ICDE, 2004; S. Papadimitriou, A. Brockwell, and C. Faloutsos. Adaptive, unsupervised stream mining. VLDB J.,13(3), 2004; M. Vlachos, C. Meek, Z. Vagena, and D. Gunopulos. Identifying similarities, periodicities and bursts for online search queries. In SIGMOD, 2004; K. Chakrabarti, E. Keogh, S. Mehotra, and M. Pazzani. Localy adaptive dimensionality reduction for indexing large time series databases. TODS, 27(2), 2002; P. Patel, E. Keogh, J. Lin, and S. Lonardi. Mining motifs in massive time series databases. In ICDM, 2002; B. Chiu, E. Keogh, and S. Lonardi. Probabilistic discovery of time series motifs. In KDD, 2003.).
Typical approaches for pattern discovery and summarization of time series rely on fixed transforms, with a predetermined set of bases or approximating functions, as described in (S. Papadimitriou, A. Brockwell, and C. Faloutsos. Adaptive, unsupervised stream mining. VLDB J., 13(3), 2004; M. Vlachos, C. Meek, Z. Vagena, and D. Gunopulos. Identifying similarities, periodicities and bursts for online search queries. In SIGMOD, 2004, Y. Chen, G. Dong, J. Han, B. W. Wah, and J. Wang. Multi-dimensional regression analysis of time-series data streams. In VLDB, 2002; T. Palpanas, M. Vlachos, E. J. Keogh, D. Gunopulos, and W. Truppel. Online amnesic approximation of streaming time series. In ICDE, 2004, and K. Chakrabarti, E. Keogh, S. Mehotra, and M. Pazzani. Localy adaptive dimensionality reduction for indexing large time series databases. TODS, 27(2), 2002). For example, the short-window Fourier transform uses translated sine waves of fixed length, and has been successful in speech processing, as is further described in (M. R. Portnoff. Short-time Fourier analysis of sampled speech. IEEE Trans. ASSP, 29(3), 1981). Wavelets use translated and dilated sine-like waves and have been successfully applied to more bursty data, such as images and video streams However, these approaches assume a fixed-length, sliding window. For example, short-window Fourier cannot reveal anything about-periods larger than the sliding window length. Wavelets are by nature multi-scale, but they still use a fixed set of bases, which is also often hard to choose.
In time series stream methods, the work described in “A multiresolution symbolic representation of time series” by Megalooikonomou, Wang, Li, and Faloutsos, in ICDE 2005: 668-679 produces a single representative for a set of scales, using vector quantization within each scale. Its main focus is on finding good-quality and intuitive distance measures for indexing and similarity search. However, this approach does not produce a window size. The window sizes are chosen a priori. Also, this approach it is not applicable to streams, it is severely restricted in the type of approximation (each window is approximated by a discrete value, based on the vector quantization output) and hence the method cannot be composed so the next level reuses the approximations of the previous level.
The work described in “A data compression technique for sensor networks with dynamic bandwidth allocation” by Lin, Gunopulos, Kalogeraki, and Lonardi, in TIME 2005: 186-188 also uses vector quantization in order to reduce power consumption for wireless sensor networks. This approach only examines a single, a priori chosen window size.
The work in “Knowledge discovery from heterogeneous dynamic systems using change-point correlations” by Idé and Inoue, in SDM 2005: 571-576) employs a similar technique for change point detection. The change point scores are then used to correlate complex time series. This approach examines only a single, a priori chosen window size, and the computation required is too costly to be feasible in a streaming environment.
Therefore a need exists to overcome the problems with the prior art as discussed above.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Briefly, in accordance with the present invention, disclosed are a method, system, and computer readable medium for identifying local patterns in at least one time series data stream. The method includes generating multiple ordered levels of hierarchal approximation functions. The multiple ordered levels are generated directly from at least one given time series data stream including at least one set of time series data. The hierarchical approximation functions for each level of the multiple levels is based upon creating a set of approximating functions. The hierarchical approximation functions are also based upon selecting a current window with a current window length from a set of varying window lengths. The current window is selected for a current level of the multiple levels.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a system for identifying local patterns in at least one time series data stream is disclosed. The system includes at least one information processing system. The information processing system includes a memory and a data stream analyzer communicatively coupled to the memory. The data stream analyzer generates multiple ordered levels of hierarchal approximation functions directly from at least one given time series data stream including at least one set of time series data. The hierarchical approximation functions for each level of the multiple levels is based upon creating a set of approximating functions and selecting a current window with a current window length from a set of varying window lengths. The current window is selected for a current level of the multiple levels.
In yet another embodiment, a computer readable medium for identifying local patterns in at least one time series data stream. The computer readable medium includes instructions for generating multiple ordered levels of hierarchal approximation functions. The multiple ordered levels are generated directly from at least one given time series data stream including at least one set of time series data. The hierarchical approximation functions for each level of the multiple levels is based upon creating a set of approximating functions. The hierarchical approximation functions are also based upon selecting a current window with a current window length from a set of varying window lengths. The current window is selected for a current level of the multiple levels.
One advantage of the present invention is that an optimal orthonormal transform is determined from data itself, as opposed to using a predetermined basis or approximating function (such as piecewise constant, short-window Fourier or wavelets). Another advantage of the present invention is that it provides a hierarchical, recursive summarization or approximation of the stream that examines the time series at multiple time scales (i.e., window sizes) and efficiently discovers the key patterns in each, as well as the key windows. Besides providing insight about the behavior of the time series by concisely describing the main trends in a time series, the discovered patterns can also be used to facilitate further data processing.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying figures where like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally similar elements throughout the separate views, and which together with the detailed description below are incorporated in and form part of the specification, serve to further illustrate various embodiments and to explain various principles and advantages all in accordance with the present invention, in which:

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an exemplary stream processing system, according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a more detailed view of an information processing system, according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3 is an exemplary x-y graph illustrating singular value decomposition, according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates local patterns for an exemplary fixed window;

FIG. 5 is an exemplary graph illustrating a power profile a sine wave, according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 6 illustrates multi-scale pattern discovery, according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 7 is a simplified version of the multi-scale pattern discovery illustrated in FIG. 6; and

FIG. 8 an operational flow diagram illustrating an exemplary process of identifying local patterns in one or more time series data streams, according to an embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention as would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art could be produced in hardware or software, or in a combination of hardware and software. However in one embodiment the invention is implemented in software. The system, or method, according to the inventive principles as disclosed in connection with the preferred embodiment, may be produced in a single computer system having separate elements or means for performing the individual functions or steps described or claimed or one or more elements or means combining the performance of any of the functions or steps disclosed or claimed, or may be arranged in a distributed computer system, interconnected by any suitable means as would be known by one of ordinary skill in the art.
According to the inventive principles as disclosed in connection with the preferred embodiment, the invention and the inventive principles are not limited to any particular kind of computer system but may be used with any general purpose computer, as would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art, arranged to perform the functions described and the method steps described. The operations of such a computer, as described above, may be according to a computer program contained on a medium for use in the operation or control of the computer, as would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art. The computer medium, which may be used to hold or contain the computer program product, may be a fixture of the computer such as an embedded memory or may be on a transportable medium such as a disk, as would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art.
The invention is not limited to any particular computer program or logic or language, or instruction but may be practiced with any such suitable program, logic or language, or instructions as would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art. Without limiting the principles of the disclosed invention any such computing system can include, inter alia, at least a computer readable medium allowing a computer to read data, instructions, messages or message packets, and other computer readable information from the computer readable medium. The computer readable medium may include non-volatile memory, such as ROM, Flash memory, floppy disk, Disk drive memory, CD-ROM, and other permanent storage. Additionally, a computer readable medium may include, for example, volatile storage such as RAM, buffers, cache memory, and network circuits.
Furthermore, the computer readable medium may include computer readable information in a transitory state medium such as a network link and/or a network interface, including a wired network or a wireless network that allows a computer to read such computer readable information. The present invention, according to an embodiment, overcomes problems with the prior art by providing a more efficient mechanism for memory copy operations. The present invention allows the processor to continue executing subsequent instructions during a memory copy operation thereby avoiding unnecessary processor downtime.
Exemplary Stream Processing System
According to an embodiment of the present invention, as shown in FIG. 1, an exemplary stream processing system 100 is shown. The stream processing system 100, in one embodiment determines optimal local patterns that describe the main trends in a time series data stream. The stream processing system 100, in one embodiment, examines the time series at multiple scales (i.e. window sizes) and efficiently discovers the key patterns in each. The stream processing system 100 also selects a window size out of a set of window sizes that most concisely captures the key oscillatory as well as aperiodic trends. In one embodiment, the stream processing system 100 is a distributed system that can operate in an SMP computing environment. It should be noted that the present invention is not limited to a distributed processing system and it is within the true scope and spirit of the invention to be implemented on other processing architectures.
The stream processing system 100, in one embodiment, includes data streams 140, 142, 144, which in one embodiment, are time series data streams comprising one or more sets of time series data. The stream processing system 100 can execute on a plurality of processing nodes 102, 104 coupled to one another node via a plurality of network adapters 106, 108. Each processing node 102, 104 is an independent computer with its own operating system image 110, 112, channel controller 114, 116, memory 118, 120, and processor(s) 122, 124 on a system memory bus 126, 128. A system input/ output bus 130, 132 couples I/ O adapters 134, 136 and network adapter 106, 108. Although only one processor 122, 124 is shown in each processing node 102, 104, each processing node 102, 104 is capable of having more than one processor. Each network adapter is linked together via a network switch 138. In some embodiments, the various processing nodes 102, 104 are able to be part of a processing cluster. All of these variations are considered a part of the claimed invention.
Exemplary Information Processing System
FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a more detailed view of the information processing system 102, according to the present invention. Although the following discussion is with respect to the processing node 102, it is likewise applicable to the other processing nodes 104 in FIG. 1. The information processing system 102 is based upon a suitably configured processing system adapted to implement the exemplary embodiment of the present invention. Any suitably configured processing system is similarly able to be used as the information processing system 102 by embodiments of the present invention, for example, a personal computer, workstation, or the like. The information processing system 102 includes a computer 202. The computer 202 has a processor 122 that is connected to the main memory 118 and the channel controller 114 via the system bus 230. The computer 202 also includes a mass storage interface 204, terminal interface 206, 1/O adapter 134, and network adapter hardware 106. The mass storage interface 204 is used to connect mass storage devices, such as data storage device 208, to the information processing system 102 system. One specific type of data storage device is a computer readable medium such as a CD drive, which may be used to store data to and read data from a CD or DVD 210 or floppy diskette CD (not shown). Another type of data storage device is a data storage device configured to support, for example, NTFS type file system operations.
main memory 118 comprises a data stream analyzer 212 for determining optimal local patterns which describe the main trends in a time series data stream 140, 142, 144. The data stream analyzer 212, in one embodiment, includes an approximation function estimator 214. The approximation function estimator 214, in one embodiment, determines appropriate approximating functions directly from data in a data stream. This process is discussed in greater detail below.
In one embodiment, the data stream analyzer 212 implements a hierarchical, recursive summarization or approximation of a data stream 140, 142, 144 that examines the time series at multiple time scales (i.e., window sizes) and efficiently discovers the key patterns in each via a local pattern identifier 216, as well as the key windows via a window size comparator 218 and a window size selector 220. The local pattern identifier 216, in one embodiment, identifies locally optimal patterns within each window and the window size comparator 218, in one embodiment, comparator the information captured by each of these patterns across various windows sizes.
The window size selector 220 then selects the optimal window sizes that most concisely capture the key oscillatory as well as periodic trends based on the window size comparison. The selection of the appropriate window sizes and approximating function can be performed across levels (i.e., not only within levels). The processes performed by the data stream analyzer 212 and each of its components are discussed in greater detail below. Besides providing insight about the behavior of the time series by concisely describing the main trends in a time series, the discovered patterns can also be used to facilitate further data processing. The data stream analyzer 212 can also perform fast, incremental estimation in a streaming setting.
Although illustrated as concurrently resident in the main memory 118, it is clear that respective components of the main memory 118 are not required to be completely resident in the main memory 118 at all times or even at the same time. In one embodiment, the information processing system 102 utilizes conventional virtual addressing mechanisms to allow programs to behave as if they have access to a large, single storage entity, referred to herein as a computer system memory, instead of access to multiple, smaller storage entities such as the main memory 118 and data storage device 208. Note that the term “computer system memory” is used herein to generically refer to the entire virtual memory of the information processing system 102.
Although only one CPU 122 is illustrated for computer 202, computer systems with multiple CPUs can be used equally effectively. Embodiments of the present invention further incorporate interfaces that each includes separate, fully programmed microprocessors that are used to off-load processing from the CPU 122. Terminal interface 206 is used to directly connect one or more terminals 224 to computer 202 to provide a user interface to the computer 202. These terminals 224, which are able to be non-intelligent or fully programmable workstations, are used to allow system administrators and users to communicate with the information processing system 102. The terminal 224 is also able to consist of user interface and peripheral devices that are connected to computer 202 and controlled by terminal interface hardware included in the terminal I/F 206 that includes video adapters and interfaces for keyboards, pointing devices, and the like.
An operating system (not shown) included in the main memory is a suitable multitasking operating system such as the Linux, UNIX, Windows XP, and Windows Server 2001 operating system. Embodiments of the present invention are able to use any other suitable operating system. Some embodiments of the present invention utilize architectures, such as an object oriented framework mechanism, that allows instructions of the components of operating system (not shown) to be executed on any processor located within the processing node 102. The network adapter hardware 206 is used to provide an interface to a network 226. Embodiments of the present invention are able to be adapted to work with any data communications connections including present day analog and/or digital techniques or via a future networking mechanism.
Although the exemplary embodiments of the present invention are described in the context of a fully functional computer system, those skilled in the art will appreciate that embodiments are capable of being distributed as a program product via floppy disk, e.g. CD 210 and its equivalents, floppy disk (not shown), or other form of recordable media, or via any type of electronic transmission mechanism.
Exemplary Notation To Be Used Throughout The Following Discussion
Throughout the following discussion boldface lowercase letters are used for column vectors, v≡[v₁v₂. . . v_n]^Tε Rⁿ, and boldface capital letters for matrices, A ε R^m×n. The notation a_(i)is adopted for the columns A≡[a₁a₂. . . a₃] and a_(i)is adopted for the rows of A≡[a₍₁₎a₍₂₎. . . a_m]^T. Note that a_(i)are also column vectors, not row vectors. Throughout this discussion, vectors are represented as column vectors. For matrix/vector elements, subscripts, a_(i,j), or brackets, a[i,j] are used. The rows of A are points in an (at most) n-dimensional space, a_(i)ε Rⁿwhich is the row space of A. A “special” orthonormal basis for the row space can be found that defines a new coordinate system as shown in FIG. 3. For example, FIG. 3 illustrates singular value decomposition (“SVD”) (for dimension n=2), with respect to row space. Each point in FIG. 3 corresponds to a row of the matrix A and v_j, j=1, 2 are the left singular vectors of A. The square is the one dimensional approximation of a_(i)by projecting it-onto the first singular vector.
If v_jis a unit-length vector defining one of the axes in the row space, then for each row a_(i), it's j-th coordinate in the new axes is the dot product a_(i) ^Tv_j=:p_ijso that, if V:=[v₁. . . v_r] and we define P :=AV, then each row of P is the same point as the corresponding row of A but with respect to the new coordinate system. Therefore, lengths and distances are preserved, i.e. ∥a_(i)∥=∥p_(i)∥ and ∥a_(i)−a_(j)∥=∥p_(i)−p_(j)∥, for all 1≦i,j≦m.
However, the new coordinate system is “special” in the following sense. If only the first k columns of P (e.g. a matrix named {tilde over (P)} thus effectively projecting each point into a space with lower dimension k. Also, rows of the matrix Ã:={tilde over (P)}{tilde over (V)}^T(EQ 1) are the same points translated back into the original coordinate system of the row space, e.g. the square 302 in FIG. 3 if k=1), where {tilde over (V)} comprises the first k columns of V. Then {tilde over (P)}. maximizes the sum of squares ∥{tilde over (P)}∥_F ²=Σ_i,j=1 ^m,kp_ij ⁻²or, equivalently, minimizes the sum of squared residual distances (e.g. the thick dotted 304 line in FIG. 3, if k=1), ∥X−{tilde over (X)}∥_F ²=Σ_i=1 ^m∥x_(i)−{tilde over (x)}_(i)∥².
Therefore, from the point of view of the row space A=P V^T. The same can be done for the column space of A and get A=UQ^T, where U is also column-orthonormal, like V. It turns out that U and V have a special significance, which is formally stated as follows:
(Singular Value Decomposition)
Every matrix A ε R^m×ncan be decomposed into A=U Σ V^Twhere U ε R^m×r, V ε R^n×r, and Σ ε R^r×r, with r≦min(m, n) the rank of A. The columns v_iof V≡[v₁. . . v_r]are the right singular vectors of A and they form an orthonormal basis its row space. Similarly, the columns u_iof U≡[u₁. . . u_r] are the left singular vectors and form a basis of the column space of A. Finally, Σ≡diag[σ₁. . . σ_r] is a diagonal matrix with positive values σ_i, called the singular values of A.
From the above, the matrix of projections P is P=U Σ. Next, the properties of a low-dimensional approximation can be formally stated using the first k singular values (and corresponding singular vectors) of A:
(Low-Rank Approximation)
If only the singular vectors corresponding to the k highest singular values (k<r), i.e. if Ũ:=[u₁u₂. . . u_k], {tilde over (V)}:=[v₁v₂. . . v_k] and {tilde over (Σ)}=diag[σ₁σ₂. . . σ_k] are kept, then Ã=Ũ{tilde over (Σ)}{tilde over (V)}^Tis the best approximation of A, in the sense that it minimizes the error ∥A−Ã∥_F ²:=Σ_i,j=1 ^m,n|a_ij−ã_ij|²=Σ_i=k+1 ^rσ_i ²(EQ 2). In equation (1), note the special significance of the singular values for representing the approximation's squared error. Furthermore, since U and V are orthonormal, Σ_i=1 ^rσ_i ²=∥A∥_F ²and Σ_i=1 ^kσ_i ²=∥Ã∥_F ²(EQ 3). The following table, Table 1, references common notations that are used throughout this discussion.

TABLE 1

Frequently used notation.

	SYMBOL	DESCRIPTION

	y	Vector A ∈ Rⁿ(lowercase bold), always column
		vectors.
	A	Matrix A ∈ R^m×n(uppercase bold).
	a_j	j-th column of matrix A
	a_(i)	i-th row of matrix A, as a column vector.
	\|\|y\|\|	Euclidean norm of vector y.
	\|\|A\|\|_F	Frobenius norm of matrix A, \|\|A\|\|_F ²= Σ_i,j=1 ^m,na_i,j ².
	X	Time series matrix, with each row corresponding to
		a timestamp.
	X^(w)	The delay coordinates matrix corresponding to X,
		for window w.
	V^(w)	Right singular vectors of X^(w).
	Σ^(w)	Singular values of X^(w).
	U^(w)	Left singular vectors of X^(w).
	k	Dimension of approximating subspace.
	{tilde over (V)}^(w)	Same as V^(w), Σ^(w), U^(w)but only with k highest
	{tilde over (Σ)}^(w)	singular values and vectors.
	Ũ^(w)
	{tilde over (P)}^(w)	Projection of X^(w)onto the first k right singular
		vectors, {tilde over (P)}^(w):= Ũ^(w){tilde over (Σ)}^(w)= X^(w){tilde over (V)}^(w).
	{tilde over (V)}^(w ⁰ ^,l)	Hierarchical singular vectors, values and
	{tilde over (Σ)}^(w ⁰ ^,l)	projections, for the k highest singular values.
	Ũ^(w ⁰ ^,l)
	{tilde over (V)} 0^(w ⁰ ^,l)	Hierarchically estimated patterns (bases).

Preliminaries
(Fixed-Window Optimal Patterns)
As discussed above, for a given a time series x_t, t=1,2, . . . and a window size w, the data stream analyzer 212 find the patterns that best summarize the series at this window size. The patterns, in one embodiment, are w-dimensional vectors v_i≡[v_i,1, . . . v_i,w]^Tε R^wchosen so that they capture “most” of the information in the series. The process of choosing the patterns is discussed in greater detail below. However, in one embodiment, the right window size is not known a priori. Therefore, with respect to multi-scale pattern estimation the data analyzer 212 finds (i) the optimal patterns for each of these, and (ii) the best window w* to describe the key patterns in the series given a time series x, and a set of windows W :={w₁, w₂, w₃, . . . }.
To find these patterns the concept of time-delay coordinates is introduced. For a time series x_t, t=1,2, . . . with m points seen so far, when looking for patterns of length w, the series are divided into consecutive, non-overlapping subsequences of length w. Thus, if the original series is a m×1 matrix (not necessarily materialized), it is substituted
$\frac{m}{w} \times w matrix .$
Instead of m scalar values there is a sequence of m/w vectors with dimension w. Patterns are searched for among these time-delay vectors.
(Delay Coordinates)
Given a sequence x≡[x₁, x₂, . . . , x_t, . . . , x_m]^Tand a delay (or window)w, the delay coordinates are a┌m/w┐x w matrix with the t′-th row equal to X_(t′) ^(w):=[x_{(t′−1)w+1}, x_{(t′−1)w+2}, . . . , x_t′w]^T. It should be noted that neither x nor X^(w)need to be fully materialized at any point in time. In one embodiment, the last row of X^(w)is stored. Note that non-overlapping windows are chosen. However, overlapping windows can also be chosen, X^(w)has m−w+1 rows, with row t comprising values x_t, x_t+1, . . . x_t+w. In this case, there are some subtle differences as is further described in (M. Ghil, M. Allen, M. Dettinger, K. Ide, D. Kondrashov, M. Mann, A. Robertson, A. Saunders, Y. Tian, F. Varadi, and P. Yiou. Advanced spectral methods for climatic time series. Rev. Geophys., 40(1), 2002.), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The subtle differences are akin to the differences between “standard” wavelets and maximum-overlap or redundant wavelets, which is further described in (D. B. Percival and A. T. Walden. Wavelet Methods for Time Series Analysis. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000.) and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
However, in one embodiment, non-overlapping windows are equally effective for pattern discovery and also lend themselves better to incremental, streaming estimation using limited resources. More generally, the original time series does not have to be scalar, but can also be vector-valued itself. The same process is performed, but only each row of X^(w)is now a concatenation of rows of X(instead of a concatenation of scalar values). More precisely, the general time-delay coordinate matrix is constructed as follows:
The following is pseudo code for DELAY (X εR^m×n, w), which concatenates w consecutive rows of X (comprising of n numbers) into one row of X^(w)(comprising of n×w numbers).


	m′ ← └m/w┘and n′ ← nw
	Output is X^(w)∈R^m′×n′{not necessarily materialized}
	for t = 1 to m′ do
	Row X_(t) ^(w)← concatenation of rows
	X_((t−1)w+1), X_((t−1)w+2),...X_(t,w)
	end for

(Incremental SVD)
Batch SVD algorithms are usually very costly. For an m x n matrix A, even finding only the highest singular value and corresponding singular vector needs time O(n²m), where n<m. Aside from computational cost, the SVD updated is incrementally updated as new rows are added to A. SVD update algorithms such as those described in (M. Brand. Fast online SVD revisions for lightweight recommender systems. In SDM, 2003 and S. Guha, D. Gunopulos, and N. Koudas. Correlating synchronous and asynchronous data streams. In KDD, 2003.), which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety can support both row additions as well as deletions. However, besides the right singular vectors v_i, both of these approaches need to store the left singular vectors u_i(whose size is proportional to the time series length).
An exemplary SVD update algorithm is shown below.


$for i = 1 to k do$ $Initialize v_{i} to unit vectors, v_{i} \leftarrow i_{i}$ $Initialize σ_{i}^{2} to small positive value, σ_{i}^{2} \leftarrow ε$ $end for$ $for all new rows a_{(t + 1)} do$ $Initialize \overline{a} \leftarrow a_{(t + 1)}$ $for i = 1 to k do$ $y_{i} \leftarrow v_{i}^{T} \overline{a} {projection onto v_{i}}$ $σ_{i}^{2} \leftarrow σ_{i}^{2} + y_{i}^{2} {energy \propto singular value}$ $e_{i} \leftarrow \overline{a} - y_{i} v_{i} {error, e_{i} ⊥ v_{i}}$ $v_{i} \leftarrow v_{i} + \frac{1}{σ_{i}^{2}} y_{i} e_{i} {update singular vector estimate}$ $\overline{a} \leftarrow \overline{a} - y_{i} v_{i} {repeat with remainder of a_{(t + 1)}}$ $end for$ $P_{(t + 1)} \leftarrow V^{T} a_{(t + 1)} {final low - \dim . projection of a_{(t + 1)}}$ $end for .$

The above SVD update algorithm is only used as an example and in no way limits the present invention. The above algorithm does not need to store the left singular vectors. Because the data stream analyzer 212 finds patterns at multiple scales without an upper bound on the window size, an algorithm that does not need to store the left singular vectors is a suitable choice. However, the SVD update algorithm is not limited to an algorithm that does not need to store the left singular vectors. Furthermore, if more emphasis is needed to be placed on recent trends, an exponential forgetting scheme can be incorporated. For each new row, the algorithm updates k-n numbers. Therefore, in one embodiment, the total space requirements are O(nk) and the time per update is also O(nk). Finally, the incremental update algorithms, in one embodiment, need only the observed values and can therefore easily handle missing values by imputing them based on current estimates of the singular vectors.
Identifying Locally Optimal Patterns
FIG. 4 illustrates local patterns for a fixed window. In FIG. 4, the window length is w=4. It should be noted that the length w=4 is only for illustrative purposes. Starting with the original time series x in FIG. 4, X^(w)is transferred to time-delay coordinates. The local patterns, in one embodiment, are the right singular vectors of X^(w), which are optimal in the sense that they minimize the total squared approximation error of the rows X_(t) ^(w). An exemplar algorithm for identifying local patterns is given below.
Local Pattern (x ε R^m, w, k=3)


	LOCAL PATTERN ( x ∈ R^m, w, k = 3)
	Use delay coord.X^(w)← DELAY( x, w )
	Compute SVD of X^(w)= U^(w)Σ^(w)V^(w)
	Local patterns are v₁ ^(w),...,v_k ^(w)
	Power is π^(w)← Σ_i=k+1 ^wσ_i ²/ w(Σ_t=1 ^mx_t ²− Σ_i=1 ^kσ_i ²)/ w
	{tilde over (P)}^(w)← Ũ^(w){tilde over (Σ)}^(w){low − dim.proj.onto local patterns}
	return {tilde over (V)}^(w), {tilde over (P)}^(w), {tilde over (Σ)}^(w)and π^(w)

The projections {tilde over (P)}^(w)onto the local patterns {tilde over (v)}⁽ⁱ⁾are discussed in greater detail below. Note that the above algorithm for identifying local patterns can be applied in general to n-dimensional vector-valued series. The pseudocode is the same, since the DELAY algorithm discussed above can also operate on matrices X ε R^m×n. In one embodiment, the first argument of LocalPattern may be a matrix, with one row x_(t)ε Rⁿper timestamp t=1,2, . . . , m.
In one embodiment, when computing the SVD, the highest k singular values and the corresponding singular vectors can be used because only {tilde over (V)}^(w)and {tilde over (P)}^(w)are returned. Therefore, the process of computing the full SVD can be avoided and more efficient algorithms, just for the quantities that are actually needed can be used. Also, note that {tilde over (Σ)}^(w)can be computed from {tilde over (P)}^(w),since by construction σ_i ²=∥p_i∥²=Σ_j=1 ^mp_ji ²(EQ 4). However, these are returned separately, which avoids duplicate computation. Furthermore, equation (3) does not hold exactly for the estimates returned by IncrementalSVD and, in one embodiment, it is better to use the estimates of the singular values σ_i ²computed as part of IncrementalSVD.
In one embodiment, a default value of k=3 local patterns, although in another embodiment, an energy-based criteria to choose k can be chosen. It should be noted that the present invention is not limited to k=3, as k can be greater than 3 or less than 3. In one embodiment 3 or fewer patterns are sufficient because the first pattern captures the average trend (aperiodic if present) and the next two capture the main low-frequency and high frequency periodic trends. These trends are further described in (M. Ghil, M. Allen, M. Dettinger, K. Ide, D. Kondrashov, M. Mann, A. Robertson, A. Saunders, Y. Tian, F. Varadi, and P. Yiou. Advanced spectral methods for climatic time series. Rev. Geophys., 40(1), 2002.), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. For a single window w, batch algorithms for computing the k highest singular values of a m×n matrix (n<m) are 0(kmn²). Therefore, for window size w the time complexity is
$O (k \frac{t}{w} w^{2}) = O (ktw) .$

In one embodiment, to determine the local patterns for all windows up to w_max=O(t), then the total complexity is O(kt³).

Once optimal patterns for a number of different windows sizes have been determined, the data stream analyzer 212 determines which of these windows best describes the main trends. Intuitively, if there is a trend that repeats with a period of T, then different subsequences in the time-delay coordinate space should be highly correlated when w≈T. This is illustrated in FIG. 5, which shows a power profile 500 of sine wave x_t=sin(2πt/50)+ε_t, with Gaussian noise ε_t˜N(5,0.5). It should be noted the trends can be arbitrary and FIG. 5 shows a sine wave only as an example. The plot 502 in FIG. 5 shows the squared approximation error per window element, using k=1 pattern on a sine wave with period T=50. As expected, for window size w=T=50 the approximation error drops sharply and essentially corresponds to the Gaussian noise floor. For windows w=iT that are multiples of T, the error also drops. Also the error for all windows is proportional to 1/w, since it is per window element. Eventually, for window size equal to the length of the entire time series w=m(not shown in FIG. 5, where m=2000), π^(m)=0 since first pattern is the only singular vector, which coincides with the series itself. Therefore, the residual error is zero.
Formally, the squared approximation error of the time-delay matrix X^(w)is ε^(w):=Σ_t∥{tilde over (x)}_(t) ^(w)−x_(t) ^(w)∥²=∥{tilde over (X)}^(w)−X^(w)∥_F ², where {tilde over (X)}^(w):={tilde over (P)}^(w)({tilde over (V)}^(w))^Tis the reconstruction, (see Equation 1). From Equations 2 and 3 ε^(w)=∥X^(w)∥_F ²≈∥x∥²−Σ_i=1 ^k(σ_i ^(w))². Based on this, the power can be defined, which is an estimate the error per window element. The power profile π^(w), in one embodiment (“POWER PROFILE”) can be defined as follows: for a given number of patterns (k=2 or 3) and for any window size w, the power profile is the sequence defined by
$\begin{matrix} π^{(w)} : = \frac{\in^{(w)}}{w} . & (EQ 5) \end{matrix}$
In other words, this is an estimate of the variance per dimension, assuming that the discarded dimensions correspond to isotropic Gaussian noise (i.e., uncorrelated with same variance in each dimension). The variance is lower when w=T, where T is the period of an arbitrary main trend.
The following lemma follows from the above observations. Note that the conclusion is valid both ways, i.e., perfect copies imply zero power and vice versa. Also, the conclusion holds regardless of alignment (i.e., the periodic part does not have to start at the beginning of a windowed subsequence). A change in alignment only affects the phase of the discovered local patterns, but not their shape or the reconstruction accuracy.
(Zero Power)
If x ε R′ comprises of exact copies of a subsequence of length T then, for every number of patterns k=1, 2, . . . and at each multiple of T, π^(iT)=0, i=1,2, . . . , and vice versa. In general, if the trend does not comprise of exact copies, the power is not zero, but it still exhibits a sharp drop. This fact is used when choosing the “best” window.
Choosing The Window
The following are exemplary steps for interpreting the power profile to choose the appropriate window that best captures the main trends, according to one embodiment. The power profile π^(w)versus w is determined. The first window w₀* that exhibits a sharp drop π(w₀*) is identified and all other drops occurring at windows w≈iw₀*, i=2,3, . . . that are approximately multiples of w₀* are ignored. If there are several sharp drops at windows w_i* that are not multiples of each other, then any of these is suitable. In one embodiment, the smallest one is chosen. In another embodiment, the window w_i* is chosen based on prior knowledge about the domain if available. If no sharp drops exist, then no strong periodic/cyclic components are present. However, the local patterns at any window can still be examined to gain a picture of the time series behavior.
Multiple Scale Patterns
As discussed above, the data stream analyzer 212 determines the optimal local patterns for multiple windows (as well as the associated power profiles) in order to determine the optimal window size. The following discussion further discusses this process in more detail. In one embodiment, a geometric progression of window sizes is chosen. Rather than estimating the patterns for windows of length w₀, w₀+1, w₀+2, w₀+3, . . . , the patterns, in one embodiment, are estimated for windows of w₀, 2w₀, 4w₀, . . . , or more generally, for windows of length w_t:=w₀·W^lfor l=0,1,2, . . . . Thus, the size of the window set W needed to be examined is dramatically reduced. However, this is still computationally expensive (for each window O(ktw)time is still needed) and all points (needed for large window sizes, close to the time series length) are required to be buffered. However, this complexity can be reduced even further.
For example, FIG. 6 shows a multi-scale pattern discovery (hierarchical, where w₀=4, W=2, k=2). FIG. 7 shows a more simplified version of the multi-scale pattern discovery of FIG. 6. As an example, let k=2 local patterns for a window size of w₀=100 and the patterns desired to be determined for window w^(100.1)=100·2¹=200. The naïve approach is to construct X⁽²⁰⁰⁾from scratch and determine the SVD. However, the patterns found from X⁽¹⁰⁰⁾can be reused. Using k=2 patterns v₁ ⁽¹⁰⁰⁾and v₂ ⁽¹⁰⁰⁾, the first w₀=100 points x₁, x₂, . . . , x₍₁₀₀₎can be reduced into just two points, namely their projections p_1,1 ⁽¹⁰⁰⁾and p_1,2 ⁽¹⁰⁰⁾onto v₁ ⁽¹⁰⁰⁾and v₂ ⁽¹⁰⁰⁾, respectively. Similarly, the next w₀=100 points x₁₀₁, x₁₀₂, . . . , x₂₀₀can also be reduced into two numbers p_2,1 ⁽¹⁰⁰⁾and p_2,2 ⁽¹⁰⁰⁾, and so on. These projections, by construction, approximate the original series well. Therefore, the first row x₍₁₎ ⁽²⁰⁰⁾≡[x₁, . . . , x₂₀₀]^Tε R²⁰⁰of X⁽²⁰⁰⁾can be represented with just four numbers, x₍₁₎ ^(100,1)≡[p_1,1 ⁽¹⁰⁰⁾, p_1,2 ⁽¹⁰⁰⁾, p_2,1 ⁽¹⁰⁰⁾, p_2,2 ⁽¹⁰⁰⁾]^Tε R⁴. Doing the same for the other rows of X⁽²⁰⁰⁾, a matrix X^(100,1)with just n=4 columns can be constructed. The local patterns are determined using X^(100,1)instead of X⁽²⁰⁰⁾. Repeating this process recursively allows for the local patterns for window w^(100,2)=100·2²=400 and so on to be determined.
As stated above, FIG. 7 shows a more simplified version of the process discussed above with respect to FIG. 6. FIG. 7 shows a data stream 700 that comprises a set of times series data. The time series is broken into a given number of hierarchical levels 702, 704, 706. One or more local approximations 708 are determined directly from the data in the first data stream 700. From the local approximations 710, approximating functions and a window size 710 and an approximation error 712 can be determined. The next hierarchical level 704, in one embodiment, can be passed the local approximation results such as the approximation functions and window size 710 from the previous level 702 for determining the local approximations for the next time series subset 714.
The local approximations 716 for the time series subset 714, in one embodiment, results in approximation functions and a window size(s) 718 and an approximation error 720. The approximation functions and window size(s) 718, in one embodiment, can be passed to the next level 706 for determining a local approximation(s) 724 for the next time series subset 722. This process can be continued for each time series subset.
(Level-(w₀,l)Window)
The level-(w₀,l) window, in one embodiment, corresponds to an original window size (or scale) w_l:=w₀·W^l. Patterns at each level l are found recursively, using patterns from the previous level l−1. In the above example, w₀=100 and l=0,1. Since w₀and Ware fixed for a particular sequence of scales w, only level-l windows and patterns, in one embodiment, need to be referred to. The recursive construction is based on the level-l delay matrix and corresponding patterns.
(Level-/Delay Matrix X^(w ⁰ ^,l))
Given a starting window w₀and a scale factor W, the level-l delay matrix is simply X^(w ⁰ ^,0):=X^(w ⁰ ⁾for l=0 and for l=1,2, . . . is recursively defined by X^(w ⁰ ^l):=DELAY({tilde over (P)}^(w ^o ^,l−10,W) where P^(w ^o ^,l):=X^(w ⁰ ^,l){tilde over (V)}^(w ⁰ ^,l)is the projection onto the level-l patterns {tilde over (V)}^(w ⁰ ^,l)which are found based on X^(w ⁰ ^,l). The level-l delay matrix is an approximation of the delay matrix X^(w ^l)for window size w_l=w₀W^l. In the above example, the patterns extracted from X^(100,1)are four-dimensional vectors v_i ^(100,1)ε R⁴, whereas the patterns for X⁽²⁰⁰⁾are 200-dimensional vectors v_i ⁽²⁰⁰⁾ε R⁽²⁰⁰⁾. However, v^(100,1)and v_i ^(100,0)≡v_i ⁽¹⁰⁰⁾can be combined to estimate v⁽²⁰⁰⁾.
(Level-l Local Pattern) V 0_i ^(w ⁰ ^,l)
The level-l pattern V 0_i ^(w ⁰ ^,l), for all l=1,2, . . . , k, corresponding to a window of w_l=w₀W^lis simply v 0_i ^(w ⁰ ^,0):=v_i ^(w ⁰⁾for l=0 and for l=1, 2, . . . The level-l, in one embodiment, is defined recursively by
$v 0_{i}^{(w_{0}, l)} [(j - 1) w_{i - 1} + 1 : {jw}_{i - 1}] := v 0^{(w_{o, i - 1})} (v_{i}^{(w_{o}, 1)} [(j - 1) k + 1 : jk]),$
(EQ 6) for j=1, 2, . . . , W. It is an approximation of the local patterns v_i ^(w ^l ⁾of the original delay matrix X^(wl), for window size w_l=w₀W¹. Consider v 0₁ ^(100,1)the above example. The first k=2 out of kW=4 numbers in v₁ ^(100,1)approximate the patterns among the 2-dimensional vectors p_j ^(100,0), which in turn capture patterns among the 100-dimensional vectors x_i ^(100,0)of the original time-delay matrix. Thus, but forming the appropriate linear combination of the 100-dimensional patterns v_i ^(100,0)≡v 0_i ^(100,0)(i.e., the columns of {tilde over (V)}^(100,0)≡V 0^(100,0), weighted according to v₁ ^(100,1)[1:2], the first half of the 200-dimensional pattern v 0₁ ^(100,1)[1:100]can be constructed (left-slanted entries in FIG. 6).
Similarly, a linear combination of the columns {tilde over (V)}^(100,0)≡V 0^(100,0)weighted according to v₁ ^(100,1)[3:4]gives the second half of the 200-dimensional pattern v 0₁ ^(200,1)[101: 200](right slanted entries in FIG. 6). For level l=2 the columns of V 0^(100,1)are combined according to v₁ ^(100,2)[1:2] (for the first half, v 0₁ ^(100,2)[1:200]) and v₁ ^(100,2)[3:4] (for the second half, v 0₁ ^(100,2)[201:400]) and son on, for the higher levels.
Lemma 1 (Orthonormality of v 0_i ^(w ⁰ ^,l))
For v 0_i ^(w ^o ^,l)=1 and, for i≠j, (v 0_i ^(w ⁰ ^,l))^T(v 0_j ^(w ⁰ ^,l))=0, where i,j=1,2, . . . , k. PROOF, for level l=0 they are orthonormal since they coincide with the original patterns v_i ^(w ⁰ ⁾which are by construction orthonormal. The process proceeds by induction on the level of l≧1. Without loss of generality, assume that k=2 and, for brevity, let B≡V 0^(w ⁰ ^,l−1)and b_i,1≡v_i ^(w ⁰ ^,l)[1:k] so that b_i,2≡v_i ^(w ⁰ ^,l)[k+1:k], v_i ^(w ⁰ ^,l)=[b_i,1, b_1,2]Then
$\begin{matrix} { v 0_{i}^{(w_{o}, 1)} }^{2} = {[\begin{matrix} {Bb}_{i, 1} & {Bb}_{i, 2} \end{matrix}]}^{2} = { {Bb}_{i, 1} }^{2} + { {Bb}_{i, 2} }^{2} \\ = { b_{i, 1} }^{2} + { b_{i, 2} }^{2} = { v_{i}^{(w_{o}, 1)} }^{2} = 1, \end{matrix}$ $and$ $\begin{matrix} {(v 0_{i}^{(w_{o}, 1)})}^{T} (v 0_{j}^{(w_{o}, 1)}) = {[\begin{matrix} {Bb}_{i, 1} & {Bb}_{i, 2} \end{matrix}]}^{T} [\begin{matrix} {Bb}_{j, 1} & {Bb}_{j, 2} \end{matrix}] \\ = b_{i, 1}^{T} B^{T} {Bb}_{j, 1} + b_{i, 2}^{T} B^{T} {Bb}_{j, 2} \\ = b_{i, 1}^{T} b_{j, 1} + b_{i, 2}^{T} b_{j, 2} \\ = {(v_{i}^{(w_{o}, 1)})}^{T} (v_{j}^{(w_{o}, 1)}) = 0, \end{matrix}$
since B preserves dot products as an orthonormal matrix (by inductive hypothesis) and v_i ^(w ⁰ ^,l)are orthonormal by construction. In one embodiment, the maximum level L is determined based on the length m of the time series so far, L≠ log_W(m/w₀).
The detailed hierarchical SVD algorithm is shown below:


(HIERARCHICAL
( x ∈ R^m, w₀, W, L, k = 6))
{Start with level l = 0, corresponding to window w₀}
{tilde over (V)}^(w ⁰ ^,0), {tilde over (P)}^(w ⁰ ^,0), {tilde over (Σ)}^(w ⁰ ^,0), π^(w ⁰ ^,0)←
LOCALPATTERN ( x, w₀, k)
{Levels l, corresponding to wondow w_l= w₀· W¹}
for level l = 1 to L do
{tilde over (V)}^(w ⁰ ^,l), {tilde over (P)}^(w ⁰ ^,l), {tilde over (Σ)}^(w ⁰ ^,l), π^(w ⁰ ^,1)←
LOCALPATTERN({tilde over (P)}^(w ⁰ ^,l−1), W, k)
Compute patterns v0_i ^(w ⁰ ^,l)for window size w_lare based
on Equation (6)
end for

Choosing the Initial Window
The initial window w₀has some impact on the quality of the approximations. This also depends on the relationship of k to w₀(the larger k is, the better the approximation and if k=w₀then {tilde over (P)}^(w ⁰ ^,1)=X^(w ⁰ ⁾i.e., no information is discarded at the first level). However, in one embodiment k is desired to be relatively small since it determines the buffering requirements of the streaming approach. Hence, in one embodiment, k=6. However, the present invention is not limited to k=6 and, in one embodiment, an energy-based thresholding, which can be done incrementally, can be chosen.
If w₀is too small, then too much of the variance is discarded too early. If w₀is unnecessarily big, this increases buffering requirements and the benefits of the hierarchical approach diminish. In one embodiment, a good compromise is a value in the range 10≦w₀≦20. Finally, out of the six patterns that are kept per level, the first two or three are of interest and reported to the user. The remaining are kept to ensure that X^(w ⁰ ^,l)is a good approximation of X^(w ⁱ ⁾.
Choosing the Scales
As discussed above, if there is a sharp drop of π^(T)at window w=T, then drops at multiples w=iT, i=2,3, . . . are also observed. Therefore, in one embodiment, a few different starting windows w₀and scale factors W that are relatively prime to each other are chosen. In one example, the following three choices are sufficient to quickly zero in on the best windows and the associated optimal local patterns: k=6 and (W₀, W)ε{(9,2), (10,2), (15,3)}.
Complexity
For a total of L≠ log_W(t/w₀)=O(log t)the first k singular values and vectors of X^(w ⁰ ^,l)ε R^t/(w ⁰ ^W _l ^{)x{dot over (W)}k}are determined, for l=1,2, . . . . A batch SVD algorithm requires time
$O (k \cdot {(Wk)}^{2} \cdot \frac{t}{w},$
which is
$O (\frac{W^{2} k^{2} t}{W^{l}})$
since k<w₀. Summing over l=1, . . . , L, O(W²k²t) is obtained Finally, for l=0,
$O (k \cdot w_{0}^{2} \frac{t}{w_{0}}) = 0 ({kw}_{0} t)$
is needed. Thus, the total complexity is O(W²k²t+kw₀t). Since Wand w₀are fixed, the following is true:
Lemma 2 (Batch Hierarchical Complexity)
The total time for the hierarchical approach is O(k²t), i.e., linear with respect to the time series length. Even though this is an improvement over the O(t³k)time of the non-hierarchical approach, all of the points, in one embodiment, are buffered, as is discussed below.
Streaming Computation
As stated above, the data stream analyzer 212 performs a hierarchical, recursive summarization or approximation of the stream that examines the time series at multiple time scales (i.e., window sizes) and efficiently discovers the key patterns in each, as well as the key windows. In this section, the procedure for examining the time series at multiple scales is discussed. In one embodiment, only one iteration of each loop in IncrementalSVD (for LocalPattern) and in Hierarchical is recursively invoked, as soon as the necessary number of points has arrived. Subsequently, these points are discarded and proceed with the next non-overlapping window.
Modifying Local Pattern
In one embodiment, consecutive points of x(or, in general, rows of X) are buffered until w of them are accumulated thereby forming one row of X^(w)). At that point, one iteration of the outer loop in IncrementalSVD is performed to update all k local patterns. Then, the w points (or rows) are discarded and proceed with the next w. Also, since on higher levels the number of points for SVD may be small and close to k, the first k rows of X^(w)can be chosen to be initially buffered and used to bootstrap the SVD estimates, which are subsequently updated.
Modifying Hierarchical
For level l=0 the modified LocalPattern is used on the original series, as above. However, the k projections are stored onto the level-0 patterns. W consecutive sets of these projections are buffered and as soon as kW values accumulate, the k local patterns for level l=1 are updated. Then the kW projections from level-0 are discarded, but the k level-1 projections are kept. The same process is performed for all other levels l=2.
Complexity
Compared to the batch computation,
$O (k \cdot Wk \cdot \frac{t}{w}) = O (w \frac{kt}{w^{l - 1}})$
time is needed to compute the first k singular values and vectors of X^(w ⁰ ^,l)for l=1,2, . . . . For l=0
$O (k \cdot w_{0} \cdot \frac{t}{w_{0}})$
time is needed. Summing over l=0,1, . . . , LO(kt)is obtained. With respect to space, w₀points are buffered for l=0 and Wk points for each of the remaining L=O(log t) levels, for a total of O(k log t). Therefore, the following is true:
Lemma 3 (Streaming, Hierarchical Complexity)
Amortized cost is O(k) per incoming point and total space is O(k log t). Since k=6, the update time is constant per incoming point and the space requirements grow logarithmically with respect to the size t of the series. Table 2 below summarizes the time and space complexity for each approach.


	Time		Space

	Non-hier.	Hier.	Non-hier.	Hier

Batch	O(t³k)	O(tk²)	all	all
Incremental	O(t²k)	O(tk)	O(t)	O(k log t)

Exemplary Process For Identifying Local Patterns In At Least One Time Series Data Stream
FIG. 8 shows an exemplary process of identifying local patterns in one or more time series data streams. The operational flow diagram of FIG. 8 begins at step 802 and flows directly to step 804. The information processing system 102, at step 804, receives a data stream comprising a set of time series data. The data stream analyzer 212, at step 806, breaks the set of time series data into a given number of hierarchical levels l. The data stream analyzer 212, at step 808 creates a set of nested summaries for each of the hierarchical level l.
The creation of the nested summaries comprises the following. The data stream analyzer 212, at step 810, determines the approximation function(s) for a portion of the set of time series data directly from the time series data. The data stream analyzer 212, at step 812, determines the approximation error between the current window and the set of time series data portion. The data stream analyzer 212, at step 814, passes the approximation function(s) determined at step 810 to the next hierarchical level as a set of time series data. The control flow then exits at step 814.
Non-Limiting Examples
The present invention can be realized in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software. A system according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention can be realized in a centralized fashion in one computer system or in a distributed fashion where different elements are spread across several interconnected computer systems. Any kind of computer system—or other apparatus adapted for carrying out the methods described herein—is suited. A typical combination of hardware and software could be a general purpose computer system with a computer program that, when being loaded and executed, controls the computer system such that it carries out the methods described herein.
In general, the routines executed to implement the embodiments of the present invention, whether implemented as part of an operating system or a specific application, component, program, module, object or sequence of instructions may be referred to herein as a “program.” The computer program typically is comprised of a multitude of instructions that will be translated by the native computer into a machine-readable format and hence executable instructions. Also, programs are comprised of variables and data structures that either reside locally to the program or are found in memory or on storage devices. In addition, various programs described herein may be identified based upon the application for which they are implemented in a specific embodiment of the invention. However, it should be appreciated that any particular program nomenclature that follows is used merely for convenience, and thus the invention should not be limited to use solely in any specific application identified and/or implied by such nomenclature.
Although specific embodiments of the invention have been disclosed, those having ordinary skill in the art will understand that changes can be made to the specific embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The scope of the invention is not to be restricted, therefore, to the specific embodiments, and it is intended that the appended claims cover any and all such applications, modifications, and embodiments within the scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for identifying local patterns in at least one time series data stream, the method comprising:

generating multiple ordered levels of hierarchal approximation functions directly from at least one given time series data stream including at least one set of time series data, wherein the hierarchical approximation functions for each level of the multiple levels is based upon

creating a set of approximating functions; and

selecting a current window with a current window length from a set of varying window lengths, wherein the current window is selected for a current level of the multiple levels.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the generating multiple levels of hierarchical approximation functions includes generating multiple increasing consecutive numerically ordered levels.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the current window is a portion of the set of time series data divided into consecutive sub-sequences, and wherein the current window length along with the hierarchal approximating functions reduces an approximation error between the current window and the set of time series data portion.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the current window length for the current window is larger than a current window length for a previous window in the multiple levels of hierarchal approximation functions.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the time series data stream is divided into non-overlapping consecutive subsequences.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the hierarchical approximation functions for each of level of the multiple levels is based upon further creating a set of coefficients that summarize the set of time series data portion in the current window.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the hierarchical approximation functions for each level of the multiple levels is based upon reusing the set of approximating functions from the previous window.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the hierarchical approximation functions for each of level of the multiple levels is based reducing a total squared reconstruction error, via principal component analysis.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein total squared reconstruction error is given by equation

Σ_i=k+1 ^wσ_i ² /w=(Σ_t=1 ^m x _t ²−Σ_i=1 ^kσ_i ²)/w

wherein k is an number of patterns chosen {1 . . . k}, wherein the patterns are vectors equal to a window length w, where m is a multiple of the window size and wherein x_tis the set of time series data portion, and wherein σ is a singular value for a given index i.

10. The method of claim 9, further comprising using a subspace tracking algorithm to approximate incrementally at least one the following quantities

the window length w w,

singular values of a matrix σ,

local patterns for window length w,

local approximations for each window of length w, and k.

11. The method of claim 3, further comprising:

calculating the approximation error between the current window and the set of time series data portion; and

basing the current window length thereon.

12. A system for identifying local patterns in at least one time series data stream, the system comprising:

at least one information processing system, wherein the information processing system includes:

a memory; and

a data stream analyzer communicatively coupled to the memory, wherein the data stream analyzer:

generates multiple ordered levels of hierarchal approximation functions directly from at least one given time series data stream including at least one set of time series data, wherein the hierarchical approximation functions for each level of the multiple levels is based upon

creating a set of approximating functions; and

13. The system of claim 12, wherein the generation of multiple levels of hierarchical approximation functions includes generating multiple increasing consecutive numerically ordered levels.

14. The system of claim 12, wherein the current window is a portion of the set of time series data divided into consecutive sub-sequences, and wherein the current window length along with the hierarchal approximating functions reduces an approximation error between the current window and the set of time series data portion.

15. The system of claim 12, wherein the hierarchical approximation functions for each level of the multiple levels is based upon at least one of:

further creating a set of coefficients that summarize the set of time series data

portion in the current window;

reusing the set of approximating functions from the previous window; and

reducing a total squared reconstruction error, via principal component analysis.

16. The method of claim 14, further comprising:

basing the current window length thereon.

17. A computer readable medium for identifying local patterns in at least one time series data stream, the computer readable medium comprising instructions for:

creating a set of approximating functions; and

18. The computer readable medium of claim 17, wherein the generating multiple levels of hierarchical approximation functions includes generating multiple increasing consecutive numerically ordered levels.

19. The computer readable medium of claim 17, wherein the current window is a portion of the set of time series data divided into consecutive sub-sequences, and wherein the current window length along with the hierarchal approximating functions reduces an approximation error between the current window and the set of time series data portion.

20. The computer readable medium of claim 17, wherein the hierarchical approximation functions for each of level of the multiple levels is based upon at least one of:

further creating a set of coefficients that summarize the set of time series data portion in the current window;

reusing the set of approximating functions from the previous window; and