US20070092198A1 - Method and System for Automated Simulation of Cable Failure in a Network - Google Patents
Method and System for Automated Simulation of Cable Failure in a Network Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070092198A1 US20070092198A1 US11/538,267 US53826706A US2007092198A1 US 20070092198 A1 US20070092198 A1 US 20070092198A1 US 53826706 A US53826706 A US 53826706A US 2007092198 A1 US2007092198 A1 US 2007092198A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- network
- cable
- programmable device
- converter
- coupled
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 25
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 title claims description 13
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 53
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000275 quality assurance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004936 stimulating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B10/00—Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
- H04B10/07—Arrangements for monitoring or testing transmission systems; Arrangements for fault measurement of transmission systems
- H04B10/075—Arrangements for monitoring or testing transmission systems; Arrangements for fault measurement of transmission systems using an in-service signal
- H04B10/079—Arrangements for monitoring or testing transmission systems; Arrangements for fault measurement of transmission systems using an in-service signal using measurements of the data signal
- H04B10/0791—Fault location on the transmission path
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to optical systems and more particularly to simulating cable failures when testing optical devices.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a conventional network 10 .
- the network 10 includes a computer system 12 which is coupled to a first fabric connectivity switch 14 by one optical cable 16 and is coupled to a storage device 18 by another optical cable 20 .
- the storage device 18 is also coupled to a second fabric connectivity switch 22 by an optical cable 24 .
- the fabric connectivity switch 14 is coupled to the second switch by an optical cable 26 .
- Simulating cable failures in a network such as network 10 is critical to development, testing, and quality assurance for devices utilized in the network.
- Conventional approaches to simulating cable failures include simulation via cables being manually pulled, providing expensive optical attenuators, or utilizing the existing switches that are provided for fabric connectivity and not for the simulation of cable failures. Each of these conventional approaches is described herein below.
- Attenuators can also be utilized for simulating cable failures.
- An attenuator can provide an automated method for cable failures, but its simulation functions by turning down the level of light until it is a very small percentage of the proper signal. This is not as accurate as complete loss of light which the method and system in accordance with the present invention provides. Attenuators are also very expensive devices that are used for many other purposes than just cable failures.
- a third conventional approach is to utilize fabric connectivity switches for simulating cable failures and determining optical connectivity.
- Fabric connectivity switches utilized for this purpose are typically very expensive. The ports on the fabric connectivity switch can be taken offline, thus simulating a cable failure. These switches are not intended for such test operations.
- a fabric connectivity switch is a device to be tested in this environment. Using the fabric connectivity switch to simulate its own cable failure could alter the outcome and may not give accurate information. This environment is also intelligent so that if the fabric connectivity switches are connected, trying to simulate a cable failure between an adapter and a disk with a fabric connectivity switch is impossible.
- this specification describes a method for simulating a cable failure in a network.
- the method includes providing a network including a plurality of devices coupled to one another via a plurality of optical cables, in which one or more of the plurality of network devices comprises any one of a switch operable to provide fabric connectivity among devices within the network, a computer system, or a storage device.
- the method further includes coupling a programmable device on one of the plurality of optical cables, in which the programmable device is operable to be controlled to simulate a cable failure on the one optical cable having the programmable device coupled thereto.
- the programmable device provides number-controlled simulated cable failures.
- this specification describes a network including a plurality of devices, in which one or more of the plurality of devices comprises any one of a switch operable to provide fabric connectivity among devices within the network, a computer system, or a storage device.
- the network further includes a plurality of optical cables for interconnecting the plurality of devices, and a programmable device coupled to one of the plurality of optical cables.
- the programmable device is operable to be controlled to simulate a cable failure on the one optical cable having the programmable device coupled thereto.
- the programmable device further provides number-controlled simulated cable failures.
- this specification describes a programmable device to be controlled to simulate a cable failure on an optical cable in a network.
- the network includes a plurality of devices coupled to one another via a plurality of optical cables, in which one or more of the plurality of devices comprises any one of a switch operable to provide fabric connectivity among devices within the network, a computer system, or a storage device.
- the programmable device includes a first converter to be coupled to a first end of an optical cable in the network, a second converter to be coupled to a second end of the optical cable in the network, and a switch coupled between the first converter and the second converter.
- the programmable device further includes a control logic to control functioning of the switch coupled between the first converter and the second converter to simulate a cable failure on the optical cable in the network.
- the programmable device provides number-controlled simulated cable failures.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a conventional network.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a network in accordance with the present invention which is coupled together utilizing optical cable.
- FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of a device which could be utilized in accordance with the present invention.
- the present invention relates generally to optical systems and more particularly to stimulating cable failures when testing optical devices.
- the following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements.
- the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiment shown but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.
- the method and system in accordance with the present invention provides an inexpensive, efficient, controlled and automated method for simulating optical cable failures.
- the method and system in accordance with the present invention is described as being utilized for fiber channel I/O cable failure testing, it is not limited to this one environment and can be utilized for all optical cable failure simulators.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a network 100 in accordance with the present invention which is coupled together utilizing optical cable.
- the network 100 has similar elements to those shown in FIG. 1 . That is, the network 100 includes a computer system 12 ′, a first fabric connectivity switch 14 ′, a second fabric connectivity switch 22 ′, and a storage device 18 ′.
- the network 100 also includes a plurality of devices 200 a - 200 d which in this embodiment are coupled to the optical cables. Each of the devices 200 a - 200 d can be connected either directly to another device, a fabric connectivity switch, or a hub.
- a first device, 200 a is coupled to one optical cable 16 ′.
- a second device, 200 b is coupled to the optical cable 20 ′.
- a third device, 200 c is coupled to the optical cable 24 ′.
- a fourth device, 200 d is coupled to the optical cable 26 ′.
- Each of the devices 200 a - 200 d can be connected in-line at the point where a simulated cable failure is desired. Thereafter the device 200 can be controlled via electrical switches, serial interface and commands, programmed automated commands, or even manual switches, thus allowing for time-controlled and number-controlled cable failure simulations which can greatly surpass conventional human-initiated cable failure simulations in both quantity and precision.
- the device 200 can be connected in any or all of the positions depicted in the network, the critical feature being a device connected to a cable between two entities.
- FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of a device 200 which could be utilized in accordance with the present invention.
- the device 200 comprises a programmed circuitry/control logic 204 coupled between optical to gigabit interface converters (GBICs) 202 a and 202 b connected on each side of the programmed circuitry/control logic and interface 204 .
- GBICs gigabit interface converters
- the control logic 204 controls the functioning of switches 206 a and 206 b coupled between the GBICs 202 a and 202 b to simulate cable failures in a controlled manner.
- the logic 204 can provide automatic commands or could be coupled to an interface to receive and provide the commands to provide the failure simulation.
- the logic 204 can be implemented in a variety of ways to provide these automatic commands.
- a serial interface such as RS 232 interface is provided to the logic 204 .
- the logic 204 could include software which can be utilized to control the switches between the two GBICs 202 a and 202 b.
- a device coupled to the serial interface (such as a server) could provide signals that would cause the software within the logic 204 to exercise the switches for a predetermined duration time, for a predetermined number of times between failures and for a predetermined number of failures.
- the logic could include a timing chip and a processor built into the logic 204 .
- Programmable code within the processor can be initiated by a user interface to exercise the switches for a predetermined duration time, for a predetermined number of times between failures and for a predetermined number of failures. Accordingly, there are a variety of systems/embodiments that could be utilized within the logic 204 to control these factors in simulating cable failures.
- the method and system in accordance with the present invention provides an inexpensive, efficient, controlled and automated method for simulating optical cable failures. Accordingly, through the use of a programmable device which can simulate cable failures in a time-controlled and number-controlled manner, an effective system of cable failure simulation is provided.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Optical Communication System (AREA)
- Monitoring And Testing Of Transmission In General (AREA)
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
Abstract
A method, system, and device for simulating cable failures in a network are provided. In one implementation, the method includes providing a network including a plurality of devices coupled to one another via a plurality of optical cables, in which one or more of the plurality of network devices comprises any one of a switch operable to provide fabric connectivity among devices within the network, a computer system, or a storage device. The method further includes coupling a programmable device on one of the plurality of optical cables, in which the programmable device is operable to be controlled to simulate a cable failure on the one optical cable having the programmable device coupled thereto. The programmable device provides number-controlled simulated cable failures.
Description
- This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/439,038, entitled “Method And System For Automated Simulation of Cable Failure In A Network”, filed May 15, 2003.
- The present invention relates generally to optical systems and more particularly to simulating cable failures when testing optical devices.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of aconventional network 10. Thenetwork 10 includes acomputer system 12 which is coupled to a firstfabric connectivity switch 14 by oneoptical cable 16 and is coupled to astorage device 18 by anotheroptical cable 20. Thestorage device 18 is also coupled to a secondfabric connectivity switch 22 by anoptical cable 24. Finally, thefabric connectivity switch 14 is coupled to the second switch by anoptical cable 26. - Simulating cable failures in a network such as
network 10 is critical to development, testing, and quality assurance for devices utilized in the network. Conventional approaches to simulating cable failures include simulation via cables being manually pulled, providing expensive optical attenuators, or utilizing the existing switches that are provided for fabric connectivity and not for the simulation of cable failures. Each of these conventional approaches is described herein below. - Manual Simulation of Cable Failures
- Simulating cable failures manually is not an adequate approach because manual simulations are both inaccurately timed and also expensive to simulate over a period of time because persons must be employed to actually pull the cable. In human terms, the timing can not be much more accurate than within 0.5 seconds. Proper cable testing should be able to constantly provide a length of failure to within 0.001 seconds or better. Also, to stimulate hundreds of cable failures, one or more persons must work night and day. The method and system in accordance with the present invention, in contrast, allows for cable failures to be simulated automatically during any time period and at any time, thereby freeing up human and capital resources.
- Utilization of Attenuators for Simulating Cable Failures
- Attenuators can also be utilized for simulating cable failures. An attenuator can provide an automated method for cable failures, but its simulation functions by turning down the level of light until it is a very small percentage of the proper signal. This is not as accurate as complete loss of light which the method and system in accordance with the present invention provides. Attenuators are also very expensive devices that are used for many other purposes than just cable failures.
- Utilization of Fabric Connectivity Switches for Simulating Cable Failures
- A third conventional approach is to utilize fabric connectivity switches for simulating cable failures and determining optical connectivity. Fabric connectivity switches utilized for this purpose are typically very expensive. The ports on the fabric connectivity switch can be taken offline, thus simulating a cable failure. These switches are not intended for such test operations. Also, a fabric connectivity switch is a device to be tested in this environment. Using the fabric connectivity switch to simulate its own cable failure could alter the outcome and may not give accurate information. This environment is also intelligent so that if the fabric connectivity switches are connected, trying to simulate a cable failure between an adapter and a disk with a fabric connectivity switch is impossible.
- In general, in one aspect, this specification describes a method for simulating a cable failure in a network. The method includes providing a network including a plurality of devices coupled to one another via a plurality of optical cables, in which one or more of the plurality of network devices comprises any one of a switch operable to provide fabric connectivity among devices within the network, a computer system, or a storage device. The method further includes coupling a programmable device on one of the plurality of optical cables, in which the programmable device is operable to be controlled to simulate a cable failure on the one optical cable having the programmable device coupled thereto. The programmable device provides number-controlled simulated cable failures.
- In general, in another aspect, this specification describes a network including a plurality of devices, in which one or more of the plurality of devices comprises any one of a switch operable to provide fabric connectivity among devices within the network, a computer system, or a storage device. The network further includes a plurality of optical cables for interconnecting the plurality of devices, and a programmable device coupled to one of the plurality of optical cables. The programmable device is operable to be controlled to simulate a cable failure on the one optical cable having the programmable device coupled thereto. The programmable device further provides number-controlled simulated cable failures.
- In general, in another aspect, this specification describes a programmable device to be controlled to simulate a cable failure on an optical cable in a network. The network includes a plurality of devices coupled to one another via a plurality of optical cables, in which one or more of the plurality of devices comprises any one of a switch operable to provide fabric connectivity among devices within the network, a computer system, or a storage device. The programmable device includes a first converter to be coupled to a first end of an optical cable in the network, a second converter to be coupled to a second end of the optical cable in the network, and a switch coupled between the first converter and the second converter. The programmable device further includes a control logic to control functioning of the switch coupled between the first converter and the second converter to simulate a cable failure on the optical cable in the network. The programmable device provides number-controlled simulated cable failures.
- The details of one or more implementations are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Features and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a conventional network. -
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a network in accordance with the present invention which is coupled together utilizing optical cable. -
FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of a device which could be utilized in accordance with the present invention. - Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
- The present invention relates generally to optical systems and more particularly to stimulating cable failures when testing optical devices. The following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements. The present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiment shown but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.
- The method and system in accordance with the present invention provides an inexpensive, efficient, controlled and automated method for simulating optical cable failures. Although the method and system in accordance with the present invention is described as being utilized for fiber channel I/O cable failure testing, it is not limited to this one environment and can be utilized for all optical cable failure simulators.
-
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of anetwork 100 in accordance with the present invention which is coupled together utilizing optical cable. Thenetwork 100 has similar elements to those shown inFIG. 1 . That is, thenetwork 100 includes acomputer system 12′, a firstfabric connectivity switch 14′, a secondfabric connectivity switch 22′, and astorage device 18′. Thenetwork 100 also includes a plurality ofdevices 200 a-200 d which in this embodiment are coupled to the optical cables. Each of thedevices 200 a-200 d can be connected either directly to another device, a fabric connectivity switch, or a hub. - As shown in
FIG. 2 , a first device, 200 a, is coupled to oneoptical cable 16′. A second device, 200 b, is coupled to theoptical cable 20′. A third device, 200 c, is coupled to theoptical cable 24′. Finally, a fourth device, 200 d, is coupled to theoptical cable 26′. Each of thedevices 200 a-200 d can be connected in-line at the point where a simulated cable failure is desired. Thereafter thedevice 200 can be controlled via electrical switches, serial interface and commands, programmed automated commands, or even manual switches, thus allowing for time-controlled and number-controlled cable failure simulations which can greatly surpass conventional human-initiated cable failure simulations in both quantity and precision. In general, thedevice 200 can be connected in any or all of the positions depicted in the network, the critical feature being a device connected to a cable between two entities. - For a more detailed description of the features of a
device 200, refer to the following discussion.FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of adevice 200 which could be utilized in accordance with the present invention. Thedevice 200 comprises a programmed circuitry/control logic 204 coupled between optical to gigabit interface converters (GBICs) 202 a and 202 b connected on each side of the programmed circuitry/control logic andinterface 204. Gigabit interface converters (GBICs) are optical to electrical converters utilized for fiber channel I/O. Thecontrol logic 204 controls the functioning ofswitches GBICs logic 204 can provide automatic commands or could be coupled to an interface to receive and provide the commands to provide the failure simulation. - The
logic 204 can be implemented in a variety of ways to provide these automatic commands. For example, in the simplest embodiment, a serial interface such as RS 232 interface is provided to thelogic 204. Thelogic 204 could include software which can be utilized to control the switches between the twoGBICs logic 204 to exercise the switches for a predetermined duration time, for a predetermined number of times between failures and for a predetermined number of failures. In a second embodiment, the logic could include a timing chip and a processor built into thelogic 204. Programmable code within the processor can be initiated by a user interface to exercise the switches for a predetermined duration time, for a predetermined number of times between failures and for a predetermined number of failures. Accordingly, there are a variety of systems/embodiments that could be utilized within thelogic 204 to control these factors in simulating cable failures. - The method and system in accordance with the present invention provides an inexpensive, efficient, controlled and automated method for simulating optical cable failures. Accordingly, through the use of a programmable device which can simulate cable failures in a time-controlled and number-controlled manner, an effective system of cable failure simulation is provided.
- Although the present invention has been described in accordance with the embodiments shown, variations to the embodiments can be made. For example, although the present invention has been described for use in a fiber I/O channel failure configuration, a system and method in accordance with the present invention could be utilized in a variety of environments and their use would be within the scope of the present invention.
Claims (18)
1. A method for simulating a cable failure in a network, the method comprising:
providing a network including a plurality of devices coupled to one another via a plurality of optical cables, wherein one or more of the plurality of devices comprises any one of a switch operable to provide fabric connectivity among devices within the network, a computer system, or a storage device; and
coupling a programmable device on one of the plurality of optical cables, the programmable device to be controlled to simulate a cable failure on the one optical cable having the programmable device coupled thereto,
wherein the programmable device provides number-controlled simulated cable failures.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the programmable device comprises a switch, control logic, and a converter.
3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the control logic provides commands associated with a simulation of a cable failure in the network.
4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the control logic receives the commands through a serial interface.
5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the converter comprises a gigabit interface converter (GBIC).
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein coupling a programmable device on one of the plurality of optical cables includes coupling the programmable device on the one optical cable at a point in the network where a simulated cable failure is desired.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one optical cable having the programmable device coupled thereto is a fiber channel I/O cable.
8. A network comprising:
a plurality of devices, wherein one or more of the plurality of devices comprises any one of a switch operable to provide fabric connectivity among devices within the network, a computer system, or a storage device;
a plurality of optical cables for interconnecting the plurality of devices; and
a programmable device coupled to one of the plurality of optical cables, the programmable device to be controlled to simulate a cable failure on the one optical cable having the programmable device coupled thereto,
wherein the programmable device provides number-controlled simulated cable failures.
9. The network of claim 8 , wherein the programmable device is coupled to the one optical cable at a point in the network where a simulated cable failure is desired.
10. The network of claim 8 , wherein the programmable device comprises a switch, control logic, and a converter.
11. The network of claim 10 , wherein the control logic provides commands associated with a simulation of a cable failure in the network.
12. The network of claim 11 , further comprising a serial interface to provide the commands to the control logic.
13. The network of claim 10 , wherein the converter comprises a gigabit interface converter (GBIC).
14. The network of claim 8 , wherein the one optical cable having the programmable device coupled thereto is a fiber channel I/O cable.
15. A programmable device to be controlled to simulate a cable failure on an optical cable in a network, the network including a plurality of network devices coupled to one another via a plurality of optical cables, one or more of the plurality of devices comprises any one of a switch operable to provide fabric connectivity among devices within the network, a computer system, or a storage device, the programmable device comprising:
a first converter to be coupled to a first end of an optical cable in the network;
a second converter to be coupled to a second end of the optical cable in the network;
a switch coupled between the first converter and the second converter; and
a control logic to control functioning of the switch coupled between the first converter and the second converter to simulate a cable failure on the optical cable in the network,
wherein the programmable device provides number-controlled simulated cable failures.
16. The programmable device of claim 15 , wherein the first converter and the second converter each comprises a gigabit interface converter (GBIC).
17. The programmable device of claim 15 , wherein the optical cable having the first converter and the second converter coupled thereto is a fiber channel I/O cable.
18. The programmable device of claim 15 , wherein the control logic receives commands to simulate the cable failure through a serial interface.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/538,267 US20070092198A1 (en) | 2003-05-15 | 2006-10-03 | Method and System for Automated Simulation of Cable Failure in a Network |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/439,038 US7146091B2 (en) | 2003-05-15 | 2003-05-15 | Method and system for automated simulation of cable failure in a network |
US11/538,267 US20070092198A1 (en) | 2003-05-15 | 2006-10-03 | Method and System for Automated Simulation of Cable Failure in a Network |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/439,038 Division US7146091B2 (en) | 2003-05-15 | 2003-05-15 | Method and system for automated simulation of cable failure in a network |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20070092198A1 true US20070092198A1 (en) | 2007-04-26 |
Family
ID=33417705
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/439,038 Expired - Fee Related US7146091B2 (en) | 2003-05-15 | 2003-05-15 | Method and system for automated simulation of cable failure in a network |
US11/538,267 Abandoned US20070092198A1 (en) | 2003-05-15 | 2006-10-03 | Method and System for Automated Simulation of Cable Failure in a Network |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/439,038 Expired - Fee Related US7146091B2 (en) | 2003-05-15 | 2003-05-15 | Method and system for automated simulation of cable failure in a network |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7146091B2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108428384A (en) * | 2018-04-23 | 2018-08-21 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | High-resistance fault simulation device for medium-voltage cable |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7146091B2 (en) * | 2003-05-15 | 2006-12-05 | Internatioanal Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for automated simulation of cable failure in a network |
CN109347548B (en) * | 2017-11-13 | 2022-09-02 | 中国航空工业集团公司西安航空计算技术研究所 | Optical path integration test platform |
CN111555898A (en) * | 2019-12-13 | 2020-08-18 | 中国船舶重工集团公司第七0九研究所 | Programmable network cable communication fault simulation device and method |
Citations (32)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4223217A (en) * | 1977-05-12 | 1980-09-16 | Eaton Corporation | Fiber optic electric switch |
US4376566A (en) * | 1980-03-03 | 1983-03-15 | Sheltered Workshop For The Disabled, Inc. | Fiber optic switching method and apparatus with flexible shutter |
US4647844A (en) * | 1984-08-03 | 1987-03-03 | Cooper Industries, Inc. | Method and apparatus for testing shielded cable assemblies |
US4705348A (en) * | 1983-03-09 | 1987-11-10 | Alps Electric Co., Ltd. | Optical switch |
US4910396A (en) * | 1988-10-21 | 1990-03-20 | Grove Charles H | Optical shutter switching matrix |
US4989946A (en) * | 1989-01-19 | 1991-02-05 | Alcatel Na, Inc. | Fiber optic switch |
US5202943A (en) * | 1991-10-04 | 1993-04-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Optoelectronic assembly with alignment member |
US5305136A (en) * | 1992-03-31 | 1994-04-19 | Geo-Centers, Inc. | Optically bidirectional fast optical switch having reduced light loss |
US5309564A (en) * | 1992-03-19 | 1994-05-03 | Bradley Graham C | Apparatus for networking computers for multimedia applications |
US5389963A (en) * | 1992-02-05 | 1995-02-14 | Dynacom, Inc. | System for selectively interconnecting audio-video sources and receivers |
US5739694A (en) * | 1995-12-29 | 1998-04-14 | Livernois Research And Development | Apparatus for testing operation of a display panel adapted to be connected to a drive mechanism by an electrical cable of predetermined connector configuration |
US5754053A (en) * | 1996-05-28 | 1998-05-19 | Harris Corporation | In service cable failure detector and method |
US5798647A (en) * | 1996-05-06 | 1998-08-25 | Chrysler Corporation | Diagnostic test controller apparatus |
US5835646A (en) * | 1995-09-19 | 1998-11-10 | Fujitsu Limited | Active optical circuit sheet or active optical circuit board, active optical connector and optical MCM, process for fabricating optical waveguide, and devices obtained thereby |
US5862362A (en) * | 1995-10-05 | 1999-01-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Network failure simulator |
US6002502A (en) * | 1995-12-07 | 1999-12-14 | Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. | Switchable optical network unit |
US6137608A (en) * | 1998-01-30 | 2000-10-24 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Optical network switching system |
US6154447A (en) * | 1997-09-10 | 2000-11-28 | At&T Corp. | Methods and apparatus for detecting and locating cable failure in communication systems |
US6244908B1 (en) * | 2000-08-04 | 2001-06-12 | Thomas & Betts International, Inc. | Switch within a data connector jack |
US20020021873A1 (en) * | 2000-08-09 | 2002-02-21 | Klaus Patzelt | Plug and system for the electrical connection of mounting racks in the switching sector |
US20020102059A1 (en) * | 2001-01-26 | 2002-08-01 | Chromux Technologies, Inc. | Micro-machined silicon on-off fiber optic switching system |
US6430352B1 (en) * | 2000-03-23 | 2002-08-06 | Fitel Usa Corp. | Apparatus and method of testing optical networks using router modules |
US6464517B1 (en) * | 2001-11-27 | 2002-10-15 | Hon Hai Precision Ind. Co., Ltd. | GBIC having spring-mounted shielding door |
US6490062B1 (en) * | 1997-12-05 | 2002-12-03 | Alcatel | Device and method for testing the operation of optical fiber communication networks |
US20030021281A1 (en) * | 2001-07-26 | 2003-01-30 | Kazuyasu Tanaka | Media converter and transmission system using the same |
US6647208B1 (en) * | 1999-03-18 | 2003-11-11 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Hybrid electronic/optical switch system |
US6658540B1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2003-12-02 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method for transaction command ordering in a remote data replication system |
US20040042406A1 (en) * | 2002-08-30 | 2004-03-04 | Fuming Wu | Constraint-based shortest path first method for dynamically switched optical transport networks |
US6714698B2 (en) * | 2002-01-11 | 2004-03-30 | Adc Telecommunications, Inc. | System and method for programming and controlling a fiber optic circuit and module with switch |
US6724993B2 (en) * | 2000-02-03 | 2004-04-20 | Telecommunications Advancement Organization Of Japan | Optical transmitter-receiver |
US6959126B1 (en) * | 2002-02-08 | 2005-10-25 | Calient Networks | Multipurpose testing system for optical cross connect devices |
US7146091B2 (en) * | 2003-05-15 | 2006-12-05 | Internatioanal Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for automated simulation of cable failure in a network |
-
2003
- 2003-05-15 US US10/439,038 patent/US7146091B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2006
- 2006-10-03 US US11/538,267 patent/US20070092198A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (32)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4223217A (en) * | 1977-05-12 | 1980-09-16 | Eaton Corporation | Fiber optic electric switch |
US4376566A (en) * | 1980-03-03 | 1983-03-15 | Sheltered Workshop For The Disabled, Inc. | Fiber optic switching method and apparatus with flexible shutter |
US4705348A (en) * | 1983-03-09 | 1987-11-10 | Alps Electric Co., Ltd. | Optical switch |
US4647844A (en) * | 1984-08-03 | 1987-03-03 | Cooper Industries, Inc. | Method and apparatus for testing shielded cable assemblies |
US4910396A (en) * | 1988-10-21 | 1990-03-20 | Grove Charles H | Optical shutter switching matrix |
US4989946A (en) * | 1989-01-19 | 1991-02-05 | Alcatel Na, Inc. | Fiber optic switch |
US5202943A (en) * | 1991-10-04 | 1993-04-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Optoelectronic assembly with alignment member |
US5389963A (en) * | 1992-02-05 | 1995-02-14 | Dynacom, Inc. | System for selectively interconnecting audio-video sources and receivers |
US5309564A (en) * | 1992-03-19 | 1994-05-03 | Bradley Graham C | Apparatus for networking computers for multimedia applications |
US5305136A (en) * | 1992-03-31 | 1994-04-19 | Geo-Centers, Inc. | Optically bidirectional fast optical switch having reduced light loss |
US5835646A (en) * | 1995-09-19 | 1998-11-10 | Fujitsu Limited | Active optical circuit sheet or active optical circuit board, active optical connector and optical MCM, process for fabricating optical waveguide, and devices obtained thereby |
US5862362A (en) * | 1995-10-05 | 1999-01-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Network failure simulator |
US6002502A (en) * | 1995-12-07 | 1999-12-14 | Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. | Switchable optical network unit |
US5739694A (en) * | 1995-12-29 | 1998-04-14 | Livernois Research And Development | Apparatus for testing operation of a display panel adapted to be connected to a drive mechanism by an electrical cable of predetermined connector configuration |
US5798647A (en) * | 1996-05-06 | 1998-08-25 | Chrysler Corporation | Diagnostic test controller apparatus |
US5754053A (en) * | 1996-05-28 | 1998-05-19 | Harris Corporation | In service cable failure detector and method |
US6154447A (en) * | 1997-09-10 | 2000-11-28 | At&T Corp. | Methods and apparatus for detecting and locating cable failure in communication systems |
US6490062B1 (en) * | 1997-12-05 | 2002-12-03 | Alcatel | Device and method for testing the operation of optical fiber communication networks |
US6137608A (en) * | 1998-01-30 | 2000-10-24 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Optical network switching system |
US6647208B1 (en) * | 1999-03-18 | 2003-11-11 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Hybrid electronic/optical switch system |
US6724993B2 (en) * | 2000-02-03 | 2004-04-20 | Telecommunications Advancement Organization Of Japan | Optical transmitter-receiver |
US6430352B1 (en) * | 2000-03-23 | 2002-08-06 | Fitel Usa Corp. | Apparatus and method of testing optical networks using router modules |
US6658540B1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2003-12-02 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method for transaction command ordering in a remote data replication system |
US6244908B1 (en) * | 2000-08-04 | 2001-06-12 | Thomas & Betts International, Inc. | Switch within a data connector jack |
US20020021873A1 (en) * | 2000-08-09 | 2002-02-21 | Klaus Patzelt | Plug and system for the electrical connection of mounting racks in the switching sector |
US20020102059A1 (en) * | 2001-01-26 | 2002-08-01 | Chromux Technologies, Inc. | Micro-machined silicon on-off fiber optic switching system |
US20030021281A1 (en) * | 2001-07-26 | 2003-01-30 | Kazuyasu Tanaka | Media converter and transmission system using the same |
US6464517B1 (en) * | 2001-11-27 | 2002-10-15 | Hon Hai Precision Ind. Co., Ltd. | GBIC having spring-mounted shielding door |
US6714698B2 (en) * | 2002-01-11 | 2004-03-30 | Adc Telecommunications, Inc. | System and method for programming and controlling a fiber optic circuit and module with switch |
US6959126B1 (en) * | 2002-02-08 | 2005-10-25 | Calient Networks | Multipurpose testing system for optical cross connect devices |
US20040042406A1 (en) * | 2002-08-30 | 2004-03-04 | Fuming Wu | Constraint-based shortest path first method for dynamically switched optical transport networks |
US7146091B2 (en) * | 2003-05-15 | 2006-12-05 | Internatioanal Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for automated simulation of cable failure in a network |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108428384A (en) * | 2018-04-23 | 2018-08-21 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | High-resistance fault simulation device for medium-voltage cable |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20040228604A1 (en) | 2004-11-18 |
US7146091B2 (en) | 2006-12-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN107769836B (en) | Satellite universal automatic test platform and data interaction method thereof | |
US6202044B1 (en) | Concurrent hardware-software co-simulation | |
JP5688220B2 (en) | Networked test system | |
CN106155950B (en) | Parameter processing method and device | |
US20070092198A1 (en) | Method and System for Automated Simulation of Cable Failure in a Network | |
CN110083541A (en) | Game test method, device, computer storage medium and electronic equipment | |
ATE318472T1 (en) | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TESTING THE LOAD OF AT LEAST ONE IP-BASED DEVICE | |
CN110535945A (en) | Test method, device, equipment and the storage medium of storage cluster alarm function | |
CN104978271A (en) | Automatic upgrade pressure measurement method and system for Android system | |
US7152173B2 (en) | Method and control apparatus for controlling startup of multiple IDE—HDDs | |
CN108594052A (en) | A kind of Auto-Test System and method based on LabVIEW and PXI boards | |
US4161276A (en) | Complex logical fault detection apparatus and method | |
CN104168520B (en) | Optical link for remote control optical communication equipment selects device and method | |
CN109581918A (en) | A kind of multi channel signals switching equipment and signal switching method | |
CN110459260A (en) | Automatic test switching device, method and system | |
CN111025046B (en) | Test system, method for controlling matrix switch and storage medium | |
US20170185123A1 (en) | Removable test and diagnostics circuit | |
CN113810246A (en) | Portable GJB-289A test equipment, test method and fault detection method | |
CN109358604B (en) | A control system input and output module function testing device and testing method | |
CN116263595B (en) | Universal automatic test platform for satellite single machine environment test and control method thereof | |
CN208283493U (en) | A kind of Auto-Test System based on LabVIEW and PXI board | |
US6690720B1 (en) | Automated testing of modem training | |
KR0185102B1 (en) | How to save real-time flight data in aircraft simulator | |
CN206696311U (en) | The test system and test fixture of a kind of quick charger | |
CN113688058B (en) | Automatic detection system and detection method for station server monitoring software |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, NEW Y Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LANDT, MATTHEW EUGENE;REEL/FRAME:019223/0842 Effective date: 20030514 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |