US20070037105A1 - Method for low NOx combustion of syngas/high hydrogen fuels - Google Patents
Method for low NOx combustion of syngas/high hydrogen fuels Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070037105A1 US20070037105A1 US11/439,727 US43972706A US2007037105A1 US 20070037105 A1 US20070037105 A1 US 20070037105A1 US 43972706 A US43972706 A US 43972706A US 2007037105 A1 US2007037105 A1 US 2007037105A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- air
- fuel
- syngas
- combustion
- percentage
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 38
- 238000002485 combustion reaction Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 34
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 18
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 18
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 18
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen Chemical compound [H][H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims abstract description 17
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000003245 coal Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000003345 natural gas Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000007795 chemical reaction product Substances 0.000 claims 3
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 5
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 230000003197 catalytic effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000003085 diluting agent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000009919 sequestration Effects 0.000 description 3
- UGFAIRIUMAVXCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon monoxide Chemical compound [O+]#[C-] UGFAIRIUMAVXCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910002091 carbon monoxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002737 fuel gas Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002309 gasification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 description 1
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000740 bleeding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003054 catalyst Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002803 fossil fuel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 150000002431 hydrogen Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- -1 mercury Chemical compound 0.000 description 1
- QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N mercury Chemical compound [Hg] QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052753 mercury Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003825 pressing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011593 sulfur Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010792 warming Methods 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23R—GENERATING COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OF HIGH PRESSURE OR HIGH VELOCITY, e.g. GAS-TURBINE COMBUSTION CHAMBERS
- F23R3/00—Continuous combustion chambers using liquid or gaseous fuel
- F23R3/40—Continuous combustion chambers using liquid or gaseous fuel characterised by the use of catalytic means
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23C—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR COMBUSTION USING FLUID FUEL OR SOLID FUEL SUSPENDED IN A CARRIER GAS OR AIR
- F23C13/00—Apparatus in which combustion takes place in the presence of catalytic material
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23L—SUPPLYING AIR OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS OR GASES TO COMBUSTION APPARATUS IN GENERAL ; VALVES OR DAMPERS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR CONTROLLING AIR SUPPLY OR DRAUGHT IN COMBUSTION APPARATUS; INDUCING DRAUGHT IN COMBUSTION APPARATUS; TOPS FOR CHIMNEYS OR VENTILATING SHAFTS; TERMINALS FOR FLUES
- F23L15/00—Heating of air supplied for combustion
- F23L15/04—Arrangements of recuperators
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23C—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR COMBUSTION USING FLUID FUEL OR SOLID FUEL SUSPENDED IN A CARRIER GAS OR AIR
- F23C2900/00—Special features of, or arrangements for combustion apparatus using fluid fuels or solid fuels suspended in air; Combustion processes therefor
- F23C2900/13002—Catalytic combustion followed by a homogeneous combustion phase or stabilizing a homogeneous combustion phase
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23C—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR COMBUSTION USING FLUID FUEL OR SOLID FUEL SUSPENDED IN A CARRIER GAS OR AIR
- F23C2900/00—Special features of, or arrangements for combustion apparatus using fluid fuels or solid fuels suspended in air; Combustion processes therefor
- F23C2900/9901—Combustion process using hydrogen, hydrogen peroxide water or brown gas as fuel
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E20/00—Combustion technologies with mitigation potential
- Y02E20/34—Indirect CO2mitigation, i.e. by acting on non CO2directly related matters of the process, e.g. pre-heating or heat recovery
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method for ultra-low NOx combustion of high hydrogen content fuels.
- the present invention provides a method for lowering the adiabatic flame temperature of a fuel prior to non-premixed combustion.
- Flashback is an issue with premixed dry low NOx combustion systems. Flashback remains an issue with the use of syngas as well. Regardless of whether carbon dioxide is recovered or whether air or oxygen are used for syngas production, hydrogen content of the gas typically is too high to allow use of conventional dry low NOx premixed combustion for NOx control. Therefore, diffusion flame combustion is used typically with steam or nitrogen added as a diluent to the syngas from oxygen blown gasifiers to minimize NOx. Even so, exhaust gas cleanup still may be required. Thus, such systems, though cleaner and more efficient, typically cannot achieve present standards for NOx emissions without removal of NOx.
- a further problem is that the presence of diluent in the fuel increases mass flow through the turbine often requiring the bleeding off of compressor discharge air. Since bleed off of compressor air must be limited to allow sufficient air for combustion and turbine cooling, the amount of diluent which can be added to the fuel is limited. Typically, NOx cannot be reduced below about ten parts per million (“ppm”) without operational problems, including limited flame stability.
- the stoichiometric flame front temperature (“SFFT”) of high hydrogen content fuels can be reduced sufficiently to provide ultra-low NOx non-premixed combustion.
- the SFFT is reduced.
- FIG. 1 provides a diagrammatic representation of the combustion of a fuel in accordance with the present invention.
- FIG. 2 provides a graphical representation of the overall equivalence ratio versus temperature during the combustion of a fuel in accordance with the present invention.
- FIGS. 3-4 provide a graphical representation of the burner outlet temperature versus NOx in ppm.
- FIGS. 5-6 provide a graphical representation of the adiabatic flame temperature versus the temperature at the wall of the reactor at various locations.
- FIG. 7 provides a graphical representation of tests results obtained from the operation of a device according to the present invention.
- a twenty percent split of the combustion air 12 is mixed with the fuel 14 to form a fuel rich mixture 16 having an equivalence ratio of two, where a ratio of one is stoichiometric.
- a second twenty percent of the air is required to complete combustion.
- Complete conversion of the oxygen is assumed in a catalytic reactor 18 with sixty percent of the heat of combustion 20 (q) transferred to the balance of the combustion air 22 .
- q the heat of combustion
- An important aspect of the present invention is that the adiabatic stoichiometric flame temperature of high hydrogen content fuels can be reduced sufficiently to allow ultra low NOx diffusion flame combustion, even for the highest inlet temperature gas turbines thus allowing wide turndown. At the operating temperatures of many turbines, low NOx is achievable with air splits as low as ten or fifteen percent. With the need for carbon sequestration becoming increasing important, the art has turned to carbon-free hydrogen such as can be produced from syngas. Nitrogen dilution of the fuel may be used for NOx control. Unfortunately, a high dilution is required to reach even ten to 15 ppm NOx.
- the maximum allowable air split is determined by the allowable material temperatures.
- the catalytic wall temperature increases as air split is increased from ten to twenty percent.
- FIG. 6 shows that wall temperature decreases with increase hydrogen content of nitrogen-diluted hydrogen for a given air split. This allows higher air splits for higher hydrogen content fuel.
- FIG. 7 provides the results of tests performed at conditions simulating operation of the IGCC unit at Tampa Electric Polk power station using the method of this invention. Emissions results at 2550° F. adiabatic flame temperature correspond to baseload operating temperature. At this condition, NOx emissions were 0.011 lbs/MMBtu or 2.0 ppm corrected to 15% O 2 . CO emissions were near zero. As reported on the web, GE report page 12 GER-4219 (May 2003) by R Jones and N. Shilling, this unit operates at less than 25 ppm NOx; however, post combustion clean-up is required for as low as 10 ppm NOx. As shown in FIG. 7 , a wide turndown at low emissions is provided. In addition, very low NOx at temperatures hundreds of degrees higher than the Tampa unit combustion temperature are possible.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention provides a method for low NOx combustion of high hydrogen content fuels in gas turbines. In the method of the present invention, at least a portion of the fuel is combusted under fuel rich conditions and a portion of resulting reaction heat is transferred to combustion air prior to non-premixed combustion of the fuel.
Description
- This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/683,719 filed May 23, 2005.
- The present invention relates to a method for ultra-low NOx combustion of high hydrogen content fuels. In one embodiment, the present invention provides a method for lowering the adiabatic flame temperature of a fuel prior to non-premixed combustion.
- With energy usage directly related to economic growth, there has been a steady increase in the need for increased energy supplies. In the U.S., coal is abundant and comparatively low in cost. Unfortunately, conventional coal-fired steam plants, which are a major source of electrical power, are inefficient and pollute the air. Thus, there is a pressing need for cleaner, more efficient coal-fired power plants. Accordingly, Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (“IGCC”) coal technology systems have been developed which can achieve significantly improved efficiencies in comparison to conventional steam plants. In such a system, syngas (a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide) is produced by partial oxidation of coal or other carbonaceous fuel. This allows cleanup of sulfur and other impurities, including mercury, before combustion.
- Concern over global warming resulting from carbon dioxide emissions from human activity, primarily the combustion of fossil fuels, has led to the need to sequester carbon. If carbon sequestration is desired, the carbon monoxide can be reacted with steam using the water gas shift reaction to form carbon dioxide and hydrogen. Carbon dioxide may then be recovered using conventional technologies known in the art. This allows pre-combustion recovery of carbon dioxide for sequestration.
- As a result of the high flame speed of hydrogen, flashback is an issue with premixed dry low NOx combustion systems. Flashback remains an issue with the use of syngas as well. Regardless of whether carbon dioxide is recovered or whether air or oxygen are used for syngas production, hydrogen content of the gas typically is too high to allow use of conventional dry low NOx premixed combustion for NOx control. Therefore, diffusion flame combustion is used typically with steam or nitrogen added as a diluent to the syngas from oxygen blown gasifiers to minimize NOx. Even so, exhaust gas cleanup still may be required. Thus, such systems, though cleaner and more efficient, typically cannot achieve present standards for NOx emissions without removal of NOx.
- A further problem is that the presence of diluent in the fuel increases mass flow through the turbine often requiring the bleeding off of compressor discharge air. Since bleed off of compressor air must be limited to allow sufficient air for combustion and turbine cooling, the amount of diluent which can be added to the fuel is limited. Typically, NOx cannot be reduced below about ten parts per million (“ppm”) without operational problems, including limited flame stability.
- There are further efficiency loss issues. If nitrogen is added to dilute the fuel gas, there is an energy penalty related to the need to compress the nitrogen to the pressure required for mixing with the fuel gas. In addition, use of syngas in a gas turbine designed for natural gas increases turbine mass flow even without syngas dilution. Typically, to avoid excessive loads on the turbine rotor, operation is at a reduced turbine inlet temperature and/or with bleed of compressed air from the turbine compressor.
- Accordingly, improved combustion systems are needed.
- It has now been found that using a reactor such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,394,791, the stoichiometric flame front temperature (“SFFT”) of high hydrogen content fuels can be reduced sufficiently to provide ultra-low NOx non-premixed combustion. By reacting a sufficient amount of a fuel under fuel rich conditions and transferring at least a portion of the heat of reaction to combustion air, the SFFT is reduced.
-
FIG. 1 provides a diagrammatic representation of the combustion of a fuel in accordance with the present invention. -
FIG. 2 provides a graphical representation of the overall equivalence ratio versus temperature during the combustion of a fuel in accordance with the present invention. -
FIGS. 3-4 provide a graphical representation of the burner outlet temperature versus NOx in ppm. -
FIGS. 5-6 provide a graphical representation of the adiabatic flame temperature versus the temperature at the wall of the reactor at various locations. -
FIG. 7 provides a graphical representation of tests results obtained from the operation of a device according to the present invention. - As shown for the
example combustor 10 inFIG. 1 , a twenty percent split of the combustion air 12 is mixed with the fuel 14 to form a fuel rich mixture 16 having an equivalence ratio of two, where a ratio of one is stoichiometric. Thus, a second twenty percent of the air is required to complete combustion. Complete conversion of the oxygen is assumed in a catalytic reactor 18 with sixty percent of the heat of combustion 20 (q) transferred to the balance of thecombustion air 22. On contact of the reacted fuel with the remaining combustion air, only a second twenty percent ofair 24 is required for stoichiometric combustion with the balance of thecombustion air 22 bypassing the flame front. Thus, forty-fivepercent 26 of the reaction heat bypasses the flame zone reducing the heat liberated in the flame by about twenty percent. - For conventional hydrocarbon fuels, including methane, the reduction in the heat liberated in the flame is not near enough for low NOx production in modern gas turbines. As shown in
FIG. 2 , even with a twenty percent air split, the adiabatic flame temperature of methane in not reduced below 1600 celsius at equivalence ratios greater than 0.3. Modem industrial and utility gas turbines require primary combustion zone equivalence ratios of greater than 0.4. For such fuels, the ultra-low NOx levels possible with lean premixed combustion, such as are possible with the method of U.S. Pat. No. 6,358,040 are preferred. - An important aspect of the present invention is that the adiabatic stoichiometric flame temperature of high hydrogen content fuels can be reduced sufficiently to allow ultra low NOx diffusion flame combustion, even for the highest inlet temperature gas turbines thus allowing wide turndown. At the operating temperatures of many turbines, low NOx is achievable with air splits as low as ten or fifteen percent. With the need for carbon sequestration becoming increasing important, the art has turned to carbon-free hydrogen such as can be produced from syngas. Nitrogen dilution of the fuel may be used for NOx control. Unfortunately, a high dilution is required to reach even ten to 15 ppm NOx.
- As shown in
FIGS. 3 and 4 , reducing the hydrogen concentration from 100 percent to 75 percent yields an unacceptably high 200 ppm NOx with conventional combustion, as demonstrated by Todd, D. M., and Battista, R. A., (2000) “Demonstrated Applicability of Hydrogen Fuel for Gas Turbines”, Proceedings of Gasification 4 the Future, Noordwijk, Netherland. The data from this reference are shown inFIGS. 2 and 3 and denoted as “Conventional GT”. Dilution to 46 percent hydrogen is required even to approach the ten ppm level; the same level that results with 75 percent hydrogen using the method of this invention employing only a ten percent air split. As shown inFIG. 4 , increasing the split from ten to twenty percent increases the amount of fuel reacted and reduces NOx by greater than a factor of more than two. It should be recognized that increasing the air split for a given fuel flow increases catalytic heat release and, in turn, increases the catalyst temperature. Accordingly, more heat is transferred to the cooling combustion air stream thereby decreasing the stoichiometric flame temperature of the fuel stream and the NOx production as shown inFIG. 4 . - The maximum allowable air split is determined by the allowable material temperatures. Thus, as shown in
FIG. 5 , the catalytic wall temperature increases as air split is increased from ten to twenty percent.FIG. 6 shows that wall temperature decreases with increase hydrogen content of nitrogen-diluted hydrogen for a given air split. This allows higher air splits for higher hydrogen content fuel. -
FIG. 7 provides the results of tests performed at conditions simulating operation of the IGCC unit at Tampa Electric Polk power station using the method of this invention. Emissions results at 2550° F. adiabatic flame temperature correspond to baseload operating temperature. At this condition, NOx emissions were 0.011 lbs/MMBtu or 2.0 ppm corrected to 15% O2. CO emissions were near zero. As reported on the web, GE report page 12 GER-4219 (May 2003) by R Jones and N. Shilling, this unit operates at less than 25 ppm NOx; however, post combustion clean-up is required for as low as 10 ppm NOx. As shown inFIG. 7 , a wide turndown at low emissions is provided. In addition, very low NOx at temperatures hundreds of degrees higher than the Tampa unit combustion temperature are possible. - While the present invention has been described in considerable detail, other configurations exhibiting the characteristics taught herein for efficient and effective heat transfer mechanisms, either catalytically or non-catalytically, are contemplated. For example, other catalytic reactor designs are contemplated as well as non-catalytic gas phase combustion. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the invention should not be limited to the description of the preferred embodiments described herein.
Claims (10)
1. The method of achieving low NOx in operation of a gas turbine non-premixed combustion system comprising:
a) obtaining a supply of fuel;
b) obtaining a supply of air;
c) forming a fuel rich mixture of the fuel with a first percentage of the air;
d) reacting the fuel rich mixture to produce partial reaction products plus heat;
e) transferring a sufficient amount of heat to a second percentage of the air; and
f) combusting the partial reaction products on contact with the heated second percentage of the air.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the fuel comprises syngas.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the syngas comprises gasified coal.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the fuel comprises hydrogen.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the turbine is operated at the design turbine inlet temperature for natural gas fuels.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the fuel comprises a carbon reduced syngas.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the amount of heat transferred to the second percentage of air lowers the stoichiometric adiabatic flame temperature of the partial reaction products on contact with the heated air to a specified temperature.
8. The method of claim 6 wherein the specified temperature is at least 200 degrees Celsius lower than that of remaining unreacted fuel.
9. The method of either claim 2 or claim 3 wherein the amount of air in the fuel rich mixture represents at least about ten percent of the total supply of air.
10. The method of either claim 2 or claim 3 wherein the amount of air in the fuel rich mixture represents at least about twenty percent of the total supply of air.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/439,727 US20070037105A1 (en) | 2005-05-23 | 2006-05-23 | Method for low NOx combustion of syngas/high hydrogen fuels |
US12/800,550 US20100330510A1 (en) | 2005-05-23 | 2010-05-19 | METHOD FOR LOW NOx COMBUSTION OF SYNGAS / HUGH HYDROGEN FUELS |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US68371905P | 2005-05-23 | 2005-05-23 | |
US11/439,727 US20070037105A1 (en) | 2005-05-23 | 2006-05-23 | Method for low NOx combustion of syngas/high hydrogen fuels |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/800,550 Continuation-In-Part US20100330510A1 (en) | 2005-05-23 | 2010-05-19 | METHOD FOR LOW NOx COMBUSTION OF SYNGAS / HUGH HYDROGEN FUELS |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20070037105A1 true US20070037105A1 (en) | 2007-02-15 |
Family
ID=37742922
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/439,727 Abandoned US20070037105A1 (en) | 2005-05-23 | 2006-05-23 | Method for low NOx combustion of syngas/high hydrogen fuels |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20070037105A1 (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090107105A1 (en) * | 2007-10-31 | 2009-04-30 | Willy Steve Ziminsky | Method and apparatus for combusting syngas within a combustor |
US20100180597A1 (en) * | 2009-01-19 | 2010-07-22 | General Electric Company | System and method employing catalytic reactor coatings |
US20100330510A1 (en) * | 2005-05-23 | 2010-12-30 | Pfefferle William C | METHOD FOR LOW NOx COMBUSTION OF SYNGAS / HUGH HYDROGEN FUELS |
EP2071234A3 (en) * | 2007-12-12 | 2014-02-19 | Precision Combustion, Inc. | Direct injection method and apparatus for low NOx combustion of high hydrogen fuels |
US9291082B2 (en) | 2012-09-26 | 2016-03-22 | General Electric Company | System and method of a catalytic reactor having multiple sacrificial coatings |
US10001278B1 (en) | 2014-12-30 | 2018-06-19 | Precision Combustion, Inc. | Apparatus and method for operating a gas-fired burner on liquid fuels |
US10738996B1 (en) | 2014-12-30 | 2020-08-11 | Precision Combustion, Inc. | Apparatus and method for operating a gas-fired burner on liquid fuels |
US11022318B1 (en) | 2014-12-30 | 2021-06-01 | Precision Combustion, Inc. | Apparatus and method for operating a gas-fired burner on liquid fuels |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3826078A (en) * | 1971-12-15 | 1974-07-30 | Phillips Petroleum Co | Combustion process with selective heating of combustion and quench air |
US5517815A (en) * | 1993-03-15 | 1996-05-21 | Mitsubishi Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Coal gasification power generator |
US6095793A (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2000-08-01 | Woodward Governor Company | Dynamic control system and method for catalytic combustion process and gas turbine engine utilizing same |
-
2006
- 2006-05-23 US US11/439,727 patent/US20070037105A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3826078A (en) * | 1971-12-15 | 1974-07-30 | Phillips Petroleum Co | Combustion process with selective heating of combustion and quench air |
US5517815A (en) * | 1993-03-15 | 1996-05-21 | Mitsubishi Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Coal gasification power generator |
US6095793A (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2000-08-01 | Woodward Governor Company | Dynamic control system and method for catalytic combustion process and gas turbine engine utilizing same |
Cited By (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100330510A1 (en) * | 2005-05-23 | 2010-12-30 | Pfefferle William C | METHOD FOR LOW NOx COMBUSTION OF SYNGAS / HUGH HYDROGEN FUELS |
US20090107105A1 (en) * | 2007-10-31 | 2009-04-30 | Willy Steve Ziminsky | Method and apparatus for combusting syngas within a combustor |
US9080513B2 (en) | 2007-10-31 | 2015-07-14 | General Electric Company | Method and apparatus for combusting syngas within a combustor |
EP2071234A3 (en) * | 2007-12-12 | 2014-02-19 | Precision Combustion, Inc. | Direct injection method and apparatus for low NOx combustion of high hydrogen fuels |
US8864491B1 (en) | 2007-12-12 | 2014-10-21 | Precision Combustion, Inc. | Direct injection method and apparatus for low NOx combustion of high hydrogen fuels |
US20100180597A1 (en) * | 2009-01-19 | 2010-07-22 | General Electric Company | System and method employing catalytic reactor coatings |
US8316647B2 (en) | 2009-01-19 | 2012-11-27 | General Electric Company | System and method employing catalytic reactor coatings |
US9291082B2 (en) | 2012-09-26 | 2016-03-22 | General Electric Company | System and method of a catalytic reactor having multiple sacrificial coatings |
US10001278B1 (en) | 2014-12-30 | 2018-06-19 | Precision Combustion, Inc. | Apparatus and method for operating a gas-fired burner on liquid fuels |
US10738996B1 (en) | 2014-12-30 | 2020-08-11 | Precision Combustion, Inc. | Apparatus and method for operating a gas-fired burner on liquid fuels |
US11022318B1 (en) | 2014-12-30 | 2021-06-01 | Precision Combustion, Inc. | Apparatus and method for operating a gas-fired burner on liquid fuels |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN101397937B (en) | Low emission turbine system and method | |
CA2715186C (en) | Low emission power generation and hydrocarbon recovery systems and methods | |
US20070037105A1 (en) | Method for low NOx combustion of syngas/high hydrogen fuels | |
EP1547971B1 (en) | System and method for cogeneration of hydrogen and electricity | |
US8734545B2 (en) | Low emission power generation and hydrocarbon recovery systems and methods | |
US7802434B2 (en) | Systems and processes for reducing NOx emissions | |
JP6169840B2 (en) | Method for separating CO2 from N2 and O2 in a turbine engine system | |
US20160177821A1 (en) | Generating Power Using an Ion Transport Membrane | |
Hashimoto et al. | Development of IGCC commercial plant with air-blown gasifier | |
US8191349B2 (en) | System and method for low emissions combustion | |
US20100330510A1 (en) | METHOD FOR LOW NOx COMBUSTION OF SYNGAS / HUGH HYDROGEN FUELS | |
US20080173021A1 (en) | Method for improved efficiency for IGCC | |
US8864491B1 (en) | Direct injection method and apparatus for low NOx combustion of high hydrogen fuels | |
Hannemann et al. | Pushing forward IGCC technology at Siemens | |
US20080098738A1 (en) | Method for improved efficiency for high hydrogen | |
Richards et al. | Syngas utilization | |
US9027352B2 (en) | Method for improved efficiency for high hydrogen | |
Soothill et al. | Carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and storage for gas turbine systems | |
Chen et al. | Effect of Different Gas Turbine on Integrated Gasification Poly-Generation Plant with Methanol and Power Generation | |
Whitehead | Clean coal technology for the utility sector | |
Kim et al. | Experimental Study on the Flame Behavior and the NOx Emission Characteristics of Low Calorific Value Gas Fuel |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PRECISION COMBUSTION, INC., CONNECTICUT Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PFERRERLE, WILLIAM C.;ETEMAD, SHAHROKH;SMITH, LANCE;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20100727 TO 20101007;REEL/FRAME:025782/0782 |