+

US20060130935A1 - Carburized component and method of manufacturing the same - Google Patents

Carburized component and method of manufacturing the same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060130935A1
US20060130935A1 US11/296,566 US29656605A US2006130935A1 US 20060130935 A1 US20060130935 A1 US 20060130935A1 US 29656605 A US29656605 A US 29656605A US 2006130935 A1 US2006130935 A1 US 2006130935A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
carbide
carburization
steel
depth
comparative
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/296,566
Inventor
Atsushi Hattori
Takashi Kano
Tomoko Serikawa
Koki Mizuno
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Honda Motor Co Ltd
Daido Steel Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Honda Motor Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Honda Motor Co Ltd filed Critical Honda Motor Co Ltd
Assigned to DAIDO STEEL CO., LTD., HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD. reassignment DAIDO STEEL CO., LTD. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MIZUNO, KOKI, SERIKAWA, TOMOKO, HATTORI, ATSUSHI, KANO, TAKASHI
Publication of US20060130935A1 publication Critical patent/US20060130935A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C8/00Solid state diffusion of only non-metal elements into metallic material surfaces; Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive gas, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals
    • C23C8/80After-treatment
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C8/00Solid state diffusion of only non-metal elements into metallic material surfaces; Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive gas, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals
    • C23C8/06Solid state diffusion of only non-metal elements into metallic material surfaces; Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive gas, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using gases
    • C23C8/08Solid state diffusion of only non-metal elements into metallic material surfaces; Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive gas, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using gases only one element being applied
    • C23C8/20Carburising
    • C23C8/22Carburising of ferrous surfaces

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a carburized component and a method of manufacturing the same.
  • Gears used as power transmission components for automobiles and so forth are components suffering from dedendum fractures which occur at the dedendum where bending stress happens, and from slip-induced fracture (pitting) which occurs in the vicinity of the pitch point.
  • a technique of carburizing the surface of the component has, therefore, widely been used for the purpose of fulfilling characteristics enough for withstanding harsh conditions, and further improvement has been made by combining various materials and heat treatments.
  • Patent Document Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication “Tokkaihei” No. 6-158266
  • the gear has, however, has been demanded to have a larger hardness with the recent increases in the output of automobiles and so forth, but the present situation is that the above-described material is insufficient for fulfilling the requirements.
  • This invention was conceived after considering the above-described situation, and an object thereof is to provide a carburized component realizing higher strength for power transmission components such as gears, and a method of fabricating said components.
  • a carburized component consisting essentially of, in percentages by mass and both ends inclusive, C: 0.1-0.30%, Si: 0.80-1.50%, Mn: 0.30-1.20%, Cr: 2.0-5.5%, and the balance between Fe and inevitable impurities;
  • This invention has basic features as described below. That is, a large amount of fine carbide grains are allowed to precipitate in the surficial portion of the component by high-concentration vacuum carburization, and to substantially exclude the surficial grain boundary oxide layer, to thereby raise the surface hardness and strength.
  • the temper softening resistance in the temperature range from about 200 to 300° C. is enhanced by introducing a large amount of Si, which is realized by the vacuum carburization, and thereby a desirable level of surface fatigue strength can be obtained.
  • C is an essential element for ensuring a necessary level of strength for the component, and is necessary to contain an amount of 0.10% or more.
  • an excessively large content thereof increases the hardness of the material, thus degrading the machinability, and thereby making the machining of the component difficult.
  • the upper limit is therefore adjusted to 0.30%.
  • Si is an element to be contained as a deoxidizing element acting in the process of melting and plays an important role in this invention.
  • the element dissolves into the solid matrix to thereby raise the temper softening resistance, so that a high level of surface fatigue strength can be obtained.
  • the element can also suppress growth of coarse carbide grains, because it shows only a small solid solubility into the carbide and raises the Si concentration in the base metal.
  • Si showing only a small solid solubility into the carbide concentrates in the matrix, and further improves the temper softening resistance of the matrix.
  • the element is necessarily contained to an amount of 0.80% or more in order to obtain this effect.
  • an excessive content of the element inhibits precipitation and the carburization surface reaction of the carbide which thereby distinctively degrades the carburization property, and also degrades the ductility, which thereby makes cracking more likely to occur in the process of plastic working.
  • the upper limit of the content is therefore limited to 1.50%.
  • Si is an element promoting oxidation of the grain boundary in the process of general gas carburization, and the grain boundary oxidation layer is causative of lowering the impact strength and fatigue strength of dedendum.
  • the gas carburization therefore cannot add a large amount of Si, whereas the vacuum carburization as described in the above can clear the problem of grain boundary oxidation, and make it possible to obtain a high-Si-content component.
  • Mn is an element to be contained as a deoxidizing element acting in the process of melting, and has an effect of improving the hardening property, so that it is necessary to contain an amount of 0.30% or more.
  • elements having an effect of improving the hardening property, such as Cr are to be concomitantly contained, wherein the elements such as Cr, capable of forming the carbide, may sometimes result in only an insufficient hardening property even under a raised Cr content or the like, depending on carbide content. It is therefore effective to adjust the Mn content in order to obtain a necessary level of hardening property.
  • an excessive content degrades the machinability due to an increase in the hardness of the material, thus the upper limit is adjusted to 1.20%.
  • Cr is an element playing an important role in this invention. This is necessary to contain an amount of 2.0% or more, as a carbide-forming element and as an element improving the hardening property. On the other hand, an excessive content of the element degrades the machinability due to increased hardness of the material, and makes a network-structured carbide more likely to be generated in the grain boundary. The upper limit of the content is therefore limited to 5.5%.
  • Mo binds with C, similarly to Cr, to produce the carbide, and has an effect of improving the pitting strength by raising the softening resistance over the temperature range from 200° C. to 300° C.
  • the element is preferably contained to an amount of 0.2% or more, for the purpose of obtaining these effects.
  • an excessive content of the element degrades the machinability due to an increase in hardness of the material, and increases the material cost.
  • the upper limit of the content is, therefore, preferably limited to 1.0%.
  • V binds with C, similarly to Cr and Mo, to produce the carbide, and has an effect of improving the pitting strength by raising the softening resistance, through production of an MC-type carbide.
  • the element is preferably contained to an amount of 0.2% or more, for the purpose of obtaining these effects.
  • an excessive content of the element degrades the machinability due to an increase in hardness of the material.
  • the upper limit of the content is, therefore, preferably limited to 1.0%.
  • Vacuum Carburization (at 1,000 Pa or Below)
  • the carburized component of this invention is subjected to vacuum carburization.
  • the vacuum carburization makes it possible to decrease the growth of the grain boundary oxide layer, and is therefore successful in raising the strength of the carburized component.
  • Si is added as an essential ingredient.
  • Si is an element promoting the grain boundary oxidation in the process of the general gas carburization, and such grain boundary oxidation is causative of reducing the impact strength and fatigue strength of the dedendum. It is, therefore, extremely difficult for the general gas carburization to achieve a large Si content.
  • the vacuum carburization can, however, suppress formation of the grain boundary oxide layer, and can readily realize a high Si content.
  • the grain boundary oxide layer causes lowering in the fatigue strength and anti-pitting strength, wherein the degree of the lowering becomes larger as the depth increases.
  • the depth of grain boundary layer from the surface of the steel after the vacuum carburization is adjusted to 1 ⁇ m or less.
  • the general carburization is normally carried out as an eutectic carburization of the surface of steel, targeted at an eutectic C content of 0.8%.
  • this invention is aimed at improving the anti-pitting property through precipitation of the carbide in the surficial layer of the steel to thereby enhance the softening resistance, so that it is necessary to contain C to an amount of the eutectic C content (0.8%) or more.
  • the surface fatigue strength cannot be improved even if the carbide is allowed to precipitate, unless the carbide is obtained with a content necessary for improving the softening resistance, so that it is also necessary to make C contained to an amount sufficient enough for the improvement.
  • the mean C concentration over the range from the surface of steel to a depth of 0.2 mm (also referred to as surface C concentration, hereinafter) is adjusted to 1.2% or more.
  • the reason why the range is defined from the surface of the steel to a depth of 0.2 mm is that the hardness in such range is important from the viewpoint of the pitting resistance.
  • an excessive content results in production of large carbide grains, and causes insufficient hardening property of the base material, thereby degrading the strength.
  • the upper limit of the surface C concentration is therefore limited to 3.0%.
  • Ratio of Carbide Area Over the Range from the Surface to a Depth of 50 ⁇ m 15% or More and 60% or Less
  • Precipitation of the carbide raises the surface hardness, improves the softening resistance over the temperature range from 200° C. to 300° C., and improves the anti-pitting resistance.
  • a ratio of carbide area over the range from the surface to a depth of 50 ⁇ m of less than 15% cannot fully improve the softening resistance, and cannot obtain a sufficient effect of improving the strength.
  • the ratio of carbide area exceeding 60% can improve the softening resistance, but lowers the surface fatigue and bending fatigue strength, because the carbide of a larger grain size is more likely to precipitate along the grain boundary in a network manner.
  • An exemplary observation of the obtained carbide is shown in FIG. 4 .
  • the carbide is a hard grain, and may serve as a starting point of fatigue fracture, similarly to non-metallic inclusions such as Al oxide and Ti nitride.
  • a smaller carbide is therefore more preferable, wherein the grain size of which is necessarily controlled to as small as 10 ⁇ m or below, so as not to allow the carbide to exist as the starting point of fatigue fracture. It is therefore controlled so that the carbide precipitates in a finely dispersed manner, so that the carbide having a grain size of 10 ⁇ m or less accounts for 90% or more of the entire portion.
  • An exemplary observation of the obtained carbide is shown in FIG. 4 .
  • a method of manufacturing a carburized component of this invention subjects the steel containing the above-described steel ingredients to a primary carburization at a temperature of Acm or above, then rapidly cools the steel to as low as point A1 or below, and then subjects the steel to a secondary carburization at a temperature of point A1 or above and Acm or below. More specifically, as shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B , the primary carburization is carried out so as not to precipitate the carbide, at a temperature of as high as Acm or above, allowing a large solid solubility limit of C and allowing no carbide to precipitate (between points “a” and “b”).
  • the steel is rapidly cooled so as to dissolve C into a solid super-saturated manner (between points “b” and “c”). Thereafter, the steel is again heated to as high as point A1 or above, to thereby allow fine carbide nuclei to uniformly precipitate from the base material super-saturated with C (between points “d” and “e”, see the upper drawing in FIG. 2 ), and the steel is further subjected to a secondary carburization so as to grow the nuclei (between points “e” and “f”, see the lower drawing in FIG. 2 ).
  • Such multi-stage carburization can realize a high-C-concentration carburization with a controlled fine dispersion of the carbide, without allowing the network-structured carbide to precipitate.
  • the carburization carried out to as far as the high-C-concentration region before point Acm makes the network-structured coarse carbide very likely to produce.
  • the carburization therein is carried out by vacuum carburization (at 1,000 Pa or below) as described in the above.
  • Shot peening S/P
  • water jet peening W/J
  • FIGS. 1A and 1B are drawings explaining carburization involved in the method of manufacturing a carburized component of this invention
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic sectional view and a drawing of an observed section of steel during the carburization shown in FIG. 1 ;
  • FIG. 3 shows a drawing explaining an exemplary carburization different from this invention, and a drawing of an observed section
  • FIG. 4 is a drawing of an observed section of the carburized component of this invention.
  • each of the steels having chemical compositions listed in Table 1 was melted in a 150-kg high-frequency vacuum induction furnace.
  • the obtained steel ingot was rolled or hot forged so as to produce a 90-mm-diameter round rod, or further hot-forged, if necessary, so as to obtain steel bar shape having a diameter of 22 to 32 mm, which was used as a test piece.
  • test pieces were subjected to the following evaluations.
  • the manufacturability was evaluated by measuring the hardness after annealing.
  • a round test piece rod of 32 mm in diameter and 100 mm in length was subjected to annealing at 920° C. for 1 hour, further annealed at 760° C. for 5 hours, and the hardness at the position of R/2 on the transverse section was measured.
  • the measurement of hardness conforms to JIS Z 2245 (B-scale), with a target value of HRB90 or smaller
  • a round test piece rod 10 mm in diameter and 100 mm in length was fabricated, as a test piece for carburization property, from a forged steel bar 22 mm in diameter.
  • the carburization was carried out in a vacuum carburization furnace, using propane as the carburization gas, wherein the surface C concentration was controlled by adjusting flow rate of propane gas, diffusion time, and carburization temperature.
  • the carburization was carried out at two levels of conditions so as to achieve a surface C concentration of 1.5% and 2.5%, respectively.
  • Example 3 the carburization was carried over the surface range of C concentration from 0.8 to 3.2%, in order to investigate influences of the surface C concentration.
  • the carburization conditions are as follows.
  • test piece was carburized at 1,100° C. for 70 minutes so as to adjust the C concentration to the topmost surface to about 1.2%, and then rapidly cooled by cooling gas to a temperature range as low as 500° C. or below, to thereby allow C to intrude into the steel to at a high concentration range so as not to be causative of precipitation of the carbide.
  • the test piece was subjected to the precipitation treatment by keeping it in the temperature range from 850° C. to 900° C., depending on the target carburization concentration, further carburized in the temperature range from 850° C. to 1,000° C. for 60 to 90 minutes depending on the target C concentration, and was hardened by immersing it into an oil bath kept at 130° C. After the hardening, the test place was annealed at 180° C. for 120 minutes.
  • Results of the evaluation are listed in Table 2.
  • Results of Example 3 obtained by varying the surface C concentration are listed in Table 3.
  • C concentration was measured using a grinding chip obtained from the surface to a depth of 0.2 mm of the treated test piece.
  • the transverse section of the carburized and annealed test piece rod was polished, corroded with picral, to a portion of a depth of 50 ⁇ m from the topmost surface was photographed under a SEM (at a 3,000 ⁇ magnification of observation), and the ratio of area was measured by image analysis.
  • the test piece was observed under the same conditions as described in the above, and the area ratio occupied by the carbide grain sized 10 ⁇ m or less was measured.
  • test piece was observed under the same conditions as those described in the above, and presence or absence of the network-structured carbide was investigated.
  • the transverse section of the carburized, annealed test piece rod was polished, corroded with nital, to a portion of a depth of 50 ⁇ m from the topmost surface was photographed under an optical microscope, and presence or absence of the incompletely-hardened structure was investigated.
  • the transverse section of the carburized and annealed rod test piece was polished, the resultant surface in an uncorroded state was observed under an optical microscope, and the depth of the layer appearing as black along the grain boundary at the topmost surface was measured.
  • the carburized and annealed test piece rod was further annealed at 300° C. for 180 minutes, the transverse section was polished, and the hardness at a depth of 50 ⁇ m from the topmost surface was measured.
  • the hardness herein conforms to JIS Z 2244 (Hv0.3), wherein a value of Hv750 or above is considered as an index ensuring a sufficient effect of improving the strength ( ⁇ 30%: in comparison with SCR420 gas eutectic carburized steel).
  • Hv0.3 JIS Z 2244
  • Hv750 or above is considered as an index ensuring a sufficient effect of improving the strength ( ⁇ 30%: in comparison with SCR420 gas eutectic carburized steel).
  • Comparative Example 4 too large in the Si content, raises a problem in the manufacturability, inhibits the carburization property, and cannot allow the carburization to proceed to a sufficient degree.
  • Comparative Examples 5 and 7 low in the Cr and Mn contents, which give only poor levels of hardening property, show the incompletely-hardened structure, and may undesirably degrade the strength.
  • the carburization targeted at a surface C concentration of less than 1.2% is successful in improving the surface fatigue strength, but unsuccessful in obtaining a sufficient effect for improving the strength ( ⁇ 30%).
  • the carburization targeted at a surface concentration exceeding 3.0% is successful in obtaining a sufficient level of 300° C. temper hardness, but shows the network-structured carbide and coarse carbide, and is unsuccessful in obtaining a sufficient effect for improving the strength.
  • the surface fatigue strength was evaluated using a roller pitting tester, wherein the surface fatigue strength was defined as the pressure on the load surface not causative of pitting over 107 cycles of the test. More specifically, a 32-mm-diameter round rod was softened by keeping it heated at 950° C., followed by gradual cooling, and was then machined to fabricate a roller pitting test piece having a diameter of test portion of 26 mm. A roller correspondent to the test piece was configured using SUJ2, and subjected to quench-and-temper so as to attain a hardness of HRC61. The radii of curvature of large rollers are 150R and 700R.
  • the carburization was simultaneously carried out with the carburization carried out for basic evaluation of the inventive steel.
  • a portion of the roller pitting test piece after the carburization was tempered at 300° C. for 3 hours, and evaluation was also made on the carbon concentration, ratio of the carbide area, the maximum carbide size and temper hardness.
  • the surface fatigue strength of each material was expressed by an index, assuming the surface fatigue strength of gas-eutectic-carburized JIS-SCR420 material is 1.0.
  • a sufficient effect of improving the strength by 30% or more as compared with gas-eutectic-carburized JIS-SCR420H steel was targeted.
  • Example 1 805 1.44
  • Example 2 798 1.40
  • Example 3 816 1.45
  • Example 4 825 1.51
  • Example 5 800 1.49
  • Example 6 804 1.46
  • Example 7 813 1.43
  • Example 8 841 1.54
  • Example 9 832 1.52
  • Comparative Example 1 shows only a low strength due to poor strength of the core portion. Comparative Examples 2, 4, 6, 9 and 10 are successful in sufficiently improving the strength, but raise a problem in the manufacturability. Comparative Examples 3 and 8 show growth of the network-structured carbide and other coarse carbide, and fail in obtaining sufficient levels of effect for improving the strength. Comparative Examples 5 and 7, having low contents of Cr and Mn, show only poor hardening properties as indicated by the incompletely-hardened structure, and fail in obtaining sufficient levels of effect for improving the strength.
  • the carburized component of this invention was confirmed as having a large amount of fine carbide grains precipitated in the surficial portion thereof, as being substantially free from the grain boundary oxide layer in the surficial portion, and being excellent in the areas of surface hardness and strength.
  • FIG. 1A A first figure.
  • FIG. 1B FIG. 3

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Solid-Phase Diffusion Into Metallic Material Surfaces (AREA)

Abstract

This invention aims to provide a carburized component realizing a larger strength for power transmission components such as gears, and a method of manufacturing the same. The carburized component of this invention, aimed at realizing the object, consists essentially of, in % by mass and both ends inclusive, C: 0.1-0.30%, Si: 0.80-1.50%, Mn: 0.30-1.20%, Cr: 2.0-5.5%, and the balance of Fe and inevitable impurities; has a mean C concentration over the range from the surface of the steel to a depth of 0.2 mm after vacuum carburization of 1.2% or more and 3.0% or less, and has a ratio of a carbide area over the range from the surface to a depth of 50 μm of 15% or more and 60% or less, has the carbide precipitated in a finely dispersed manner so that the carbide having a grain size of 10 μm or less accounts for 90% or more of the entire portion, and has a depth of a grain boundary oxide layer below the surface of 1 μm or less.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention relates to a carburized component and a method of manufacturing the same.
  • BACKGROUND ART
  • Gears used as power transmission components for automobiles and so forth are components suffering from dedendum fractures which occur at the dedendum where bending stress happens, and from slip-induced fracture (pitting) which occurs in the vicinity of the pitch point. A technique of carburizing the surface of the component has, therefore, widely been used for the purpose of fulfilling characteristics enough for withstanding harsh conditions, and further improvement has been made by combining various materials and heat treatments.
  • Particularly in recent years, a successful development has been made on a material capable of suppressing growth of grain boundary oxide layer and abnormally carburized layer during carburization, which are understood as being harmful to dedendum fracture. Another achievement has been made on improvement in the strength typically by shot peening.
  • On the other hand, pitting has also extensively been investigated, and it has been found out that prevention of softening of the material is effective to improve the strength. Gears cause slippage on the tooth surface thereof, and the repetitive contact generates heat at the portion just under the tooth surface. Temperature in this state is known to fall in the range of about 200 to 300° C., and the heat generated herein supposedly softens the material and consequently results in pitting fracture. It is therefore believed that prevention of softening in a temperature range of about 200 to 300° C. is effective for improving the pitting fracture, and development has been made on materials added with Si, Cr, Mo and so forth as alloy elements excellent in the softening resistance in this temperature range.
  • [Patent Document] Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication “Tokkaihei” No. 6-158266
  • The gear has, however, has been demanded to have a larger hardness with the recent increases in the output of automobiles and so forth, but the present situation is that the above-described material is insufficient for fulfilling the requirements.
  • This invention was conceived after considering the above-described situation, and an object thereof is to provide a carburized component realizing higher strength for power transmission components such as gears, and a method of fabricating said components.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Aiming at solving the aforementioned problems, a carburized component consisting essentially of, in percentages by mass and both ends inclusive, C: 0.1-0.30%, Si: 0.80-1.50%, Mn: 0.30-1.20%, Cr: 2.0-5.5%, and the balance between Fe and inevitable impurities;
      • has a mean C concentration over the range from the surface of steel to a depth of 0.2 mm after vacuum carburization of 1.2% or more and 3.0% or less, has a ratio of carbide area over the range from the surface to a depth of 50 μm of 15% or more and 60% or less, has the carbide precipitated in a finely dispersed manner so that the carbide having a grain size of 10 μm or less accounts for 90% of the entire portion, and has a depth of a grain boundary oxide layer below the surface of 1 μm or less.
  • It is also allowable to further add either or both of Mo: 0.2 to 1.0% and V: 0.2 to 1.0%.
  • This invention has basic features as described below. That is, a large amount of fine carbide grains are allowed to precipitate in the surficial portion of the component by high-concentration vacuum carburization, and to substantially exclude the surficial grain boundary oxide layer, to thereby raise the surface hardness and strength. In addition, the temper softening resistance in the temperature range from about 200 to 300° C. is enhanced by introducing a large amount of Si, which is realized by the vacuum carburization, and thereby a desirable level of surface fatigue strength can be obtained. These features can be obtained only under the appropriately-adjusted ingredients and conditions as detailed below.
  • C: 0.10 to 0.30%
  • C is an essential element for ensuring a necessary level of strength for the component, and is necessary to contain an amount of 0.10% or more. On the other hand, an excessively large content thereof increases the hardness of the material, thus degrading the machinability, and thereby making the machining of the component difficult. The upper limit is therefore adjusted to 0.30%.
  • Si: 0.80 to 1.50%
  • Si is an element to be contained as a deoxidizing element acting in the process of melting and plays an important role in this invention. The element dissolves into the solid matrix to thereby raise the temper softening resistance, so that a high level of surface fatigue strength can be obtained. The element can also suppress growth of coarse carbide grains, because it shows only a small solid solubility into the carbide and raises the Si concentration in the base metal. Moreover, under precipitation of a large amount of carbide, Si showing only a small solid solubility into the carbide concentrates in the matrix, and further improves the temper softening resistance of the matrix. The element is necessarily contained to an amount of 0.80% or more in order to obtain this effect. On the other hand, an excessive content of the element inhibits precipitation and the carburization surface reaction of the carbide which thereby distinctively degrades the carburization property, and also degrades the ductility, which thereby makes cracking more likely to occur in the process of plastic working. The upper limit of the content is therefore limited to 1.50%.
  • Si is an element promoting oxidation of the grain boundary in the process of general gas carburization, and the grain boundary oxidation layer is causative of lowering the impact strength and fatigue strength of dedendum. The gas carburization therefore cannot add a large amount of Si, whereas the vacuum carburization as described in the above can clear the problem of grain boundary oxidation, and make it possible to obtain a high-Si-content component.
  • Mn: 0.30 to 1.20%
  • Mn is an element to be contained as a deoxidizing element acting in the process of melting, and has an effect of improving the hardening property, so that it is necessary to contain an amount of 0.30% or more. In this invention, elements having an effect of improving the hardening property, such as Cr, are to be concomitantly contained, wherein the elements such as Cr, capable of forming the carbide, may sometimes result in only an insufficient hardening property even under a raised Cr content or the like, depending on carbide content. It is therefore effective to adjust the Mn content in order to obtain a necessary level of hardening property. On the other hand, an excessive content degrades the machinability due to an increase in the hardness of the material, thus the upper limit is adjusted to 1.20%.
  • Cr: 2.0 to 5.5%
  • Cr is an element playing an important role in this invention. This is necessary to contain an amount of 2.0% or more, as a carbide-forming element and as an element improving the hardening property. On the other hand, an excessive content of the element degrades the machinability due to increased hardness of the material, and makes a network-structured carbide more likely to be generated in the grain boundary. The upper limit of the content is therefore limited to 5.5%.
  • Mo: 0.2 to 1.0%
  • Mo binds with C, similarly to Cr, to produce the carbide, and has an effect of improving the pitting strength by raising the softening resistance over the temperature range from 200° C. to 300° C. The element is preferably contained to an amount of 0.2% or more, for the purpose of obtaining these effects. On the other hand, an excessive content of the element degrades the machinability due to an increase in hardness of the material, and increases the material cost. The upper limit of the content is, therefore, preferably limited to 1.0%.
  • V: 0.2 to 1.0%
  • V binds with C, similarly to Cr and Mo, to produce the carbide, and has an effect of improving the pitting strength by raising the softening resistance, through production of an MC-type carbide. The element is preferably contained to an amount of 0.2% or more, for the purpose of obtaining these effects. On the other hand, an excessive content of the element degrades the machinability due to an increase in hardness of the material. The upper limit of the content is, therefore, preferably limited to 1.0%.
  • Carburization: Vacuum Carburization (at 1,000 Pa or Below)
  • The carburized component of this invention is subjected to vacuum carburization. The vacuum carburization makes it possible to decrease the growth of the grain boundary oxide layer, and is therefore successful in raising the strength of the carburized component.
  • As described in the above, Si is added as an essential ingredient. Si is an element promoting the grain boundary oxidation in the process of the general gas carburization, and such grain boundary oxidation is causative of reducing the impact strength and fatigue strength of the dedendum. It is, therefore, extremely difficult for the general gas carburization to achieve a large Si content. Whereas the vacuum carburization can, however, suppress formation of the grain boundary oxide layer, and can readily realize a high Si content.
  • Depth of Grain Boundary Oxide Layer: 1 μm or Less
  • The grain boundary oxide layer causes lowering in the fatigue strength and anti-pitting strength, wherein the degree of the lowering becomes larger as the depth increases. For the carburized component of this invention, the depth of grain boundary layer from the surface of the steel after the vacuum carburization is adjusted to 1 μm or less.
  • Mean C Concentration Up to Depth of 0.2 mm from the Surface: 1.2% or more and 3.0% or Less
  • The general carburization is normally carried out as an eutectic carburization of the surface of steel, targeted at an eutectic C content of 0.8%. In contrast, this invention is aimed at improving the anti-pitting property through precipitation of the carbide in the surficial layer of the steel to thereby enhance the softening resistance, so that it is necessary to contain C to an amount of the eutectic C content (0.8%) or more. In addition, the surface fatigue strength cannot be improved even if the carbide is allowed to precipitate, unless the carbide is obtained with a content necessary for improving the softening resistance, so that it is also necessary to make C contained to an amount sufficient enough for the improvement.
  • From these points of view, the mean C concentration over the range from the surface of steel to a depth of 0.2 mm (also referred to as surface C concentration, hereinafter) is adjusted to 1.2% or more. The reason why the range is defined from the surface of the steel to a depth of 0.2 mm is that the hardness in such range is important from the viewpoint of the pitting resistance. On the other hand, an excessive content results in production of large carbide grains, and causes insufficient hardening property of the base material, thereby degrading the strength. The upper limit of the surface C concentration is therefore limited to 3.0%.
  • Ratio of Carbide Area Over the Range from the Surface to a Depth of 50 μm: 15% or More and 60% or Less
  • Precipitation of the carbide raises the surface hardness, improves the softening resistance over the temperature range from 200° C. to 300° C., and improves the anti-pitting resistance. A ratio of carbide area over the range from the surface to a depth of 50 μm of less than 15%, however, cannot fully improve the softening resistance, and cannot obtain a sufficient effect of improving the strength. On the other hand, the ratio of carbide area exceeding 60% can improve the softening resistance, but lowers the surface fatigue and bending fatigue strength, because the carbide of a larger grain size is more likely to precipitate along the grain boundary in a network manner. An exemplary observation of the obtained carbide is shown in FIG. 4.
  • Carbide Precipitated in a Finely Dispersed Manner so that the Carbide Having a Grain Size of 10 μm or Less Accounts for 90% or More of the Entire Portion.
  • The carbide is a hard grain, and may serve as a starting point of fatigue fracture, similarly to non-metallic inclusions such as Al oxide and Ti nitride. A smaller carbide is therefore more preferable, wherein the grain size of which is necessarily controlled to as small as 10 μm or below, so as not to allow the carbide to exist as the starting point of fatigue fracture. It is therefore controlled so that the carbide precipitates in a finely dispersed manner, so that the carbide having a grain size of 10 μm or less accounts for 90% or more of the entire portion. An exemplary observation of the obtained carbide is shown in FIG. 4.
  • Aiming at manufacturing the above-described carburized component, a method of manufacturing a carburized component of this invention subjects the steel containing the above-described steel ingredients to a primary carburization at a temperature of Acm or above, then rapidly cools the steel to as low as point A1 or below, and then subjects the steel to a secondary carburization at a temperature of point A1 or above and Acm or below. More specifically, as shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B, the primary carburization is carried out so as not to precipitate the carbide, at a temperature of as high as Acm or above, allowing a large solid solubility limit of C and allowing no carbide to precipitate (between points “a” and “b”). Next, the steel is rapidly cooled so as to dissolve C into a solid super-saturated manner (between points “b” and “c”). Thereafter, the steel is again heated to as high as point A1 or above, to thereby allow fine carbide nuclei to uniformly precipitate from the base material super-saturated with C (between points “d” and “e”, see the upper drawing in FIG. 2), and the steel is further subjected to a secondary carburization so as to grow the nuclei (between points “e” and “f”, see the lower drawing in FIG. 2). Such multi-stage carburization can realize a high-C-concentration carburization with a controlled fine dispersion of the carbide, without allowing the network-structured carbide to precipitate. In contrast to this, as shown in FIG. 3, the carburization carried out to as far as the high-C-concentration region before point Acm makes the network-structured coarse carbide very likely to produce. The carburization therein is carried out by vacuum carburization (at 1,000 Pa or below) as described in the above.
  • It is also allowable to subject the steel after the secondary carburization to peening if necessary, to thereby further improve the strength. Shot peening (S/P) and water jet peening (W/J), for example, are applicable to the peening.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIGS. 1A and 1B are drawings explaining carburization involved in the method of manufacturing a carburized component of this invention;
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic sectional view and a drawing of an observed section of steel during the carburization shown in FIG. 1;
  • FIG. 3 shows a drawing explaining an exemplary carburization different from this invention, and a drawing of an observed section; and
  • FIG. 4 is a drawing of an observed section of the carburized component of this invention.
  • EXAMPLES
  • The following paragraphs will describe tests carried out for confirming the effects of this invention.
  • First, each of the steels having chemical compositions listed in Table 1 was melted in a 150-kg high-frequency vacuum induction furnace. The obtained steel ingot was rolled or hot forged so as to produce a 90-mm-diameter round rod, or further hot-forged, if necessary, so as to obtain steel bar shape having a diameter of 22 to 32 mm, which was used as a test piece.
  • In the compositions of comparative examples listed in Table 1, those departing from the compositional ranges specified by this invention are indicated by a downward arrow (↓), for those short of the lower limits, an upward arrow (⇑), for those exceeding the upper limits.
    TABLE 1
    C Si Mn Cr Mo V Remarks
    Example 1 0.18 0.98 0.63 2.39 0.00 0.00
    Example 2 0.18 0.80 0.50 2.66 0.00 0.00
    Example 3 0.19 1.02 0.52 2.52 0.00 0.00
    Example 4 0.18 0.97 0.55 3.22 0.00 0.00
    Example 5 0.18 1.48 0.55 2.58 0.00 0.00
    Example 6 0.19 1.05 0.55 2.12 0.00 0.00
    Example 7 0.19 1.08 0.34 2.49 0.00 0.00
    Example 8 0.20 1.12 0.35 4.99 0.00 0.00
    Example 9 0.19 0.97 0.52 2.50 0.60 0.00
    Example 10 0.18 0.97 0.52 2.66 0.00 0.30
    Comparative ↓ 0.08  0.96 0.62 2.45 0.00 0.00
    Example 1
    Comparative ↑ 0.37  0.97 0.61 2.42 0.00 0.00
    Example 2
    Comparative 0.18 ↓ 0.40  0.49 2.92 0.00 0.00
    Example 3
    Comparative 0.19 ↑ 2.10  0.51 2.44 0.00 0.00
    Example 4
    Comparative 0.18 1.10 ↓ 0.10  2.16 0.00 0.00
    Example 5
    Comparative 0.19 0.98 ↑ 1.74  2.04 0.00 0.00
    Example 6
    Comparative 0.20 1.02 0.32 ↓ 1.10  0.00 0.00
    Example 7
    Comparative 0.20 1.13 0.32 ↑ 6.02  0.00 0.00
    Example 8
    Comparative 0.20 1.00 0.55 2.54 ↑ 1.50  0.00
    Example 9
    Comparative 0.19 0.97 0.53 2.71 0.00 ↑ 1.50 
    Example 10
    Comparative 0.20 0.22 0.89 1.12 0.00 0.00 JIS-SCR420
    Example 11
  • The obtained test pieces were subjected to the following evaluations.
  • (1) Evaluation of Manufacturability
  • The manufacturability was evaluated by measuring the hardness after annealing.
  • A round test piece rod of 32 mm in diameter and 100 mm in length was subjected to annealing at 920° C. for 1 hour, further annealed at 760° C. for 5 hours, and the hardness at the position of R/2 on the transverse section was measured. The measurement of hardness conforms to JIS Z 2245 (B-scale), with a target value of HRB90 or smaller
  • (2) Evaluation of Basic Characteristics of Carburization
  • (2-1) Method of Carburization
  • A round test piece rod 10 mm in diameter and 100 mm in length was fabricated, as a test piece for carburization property, from a forged steel bar 22 mm in diameter. The carburization was carried out in a vacuum carburization furnace, using propane as the carburization gas, wherein the surface C concentration was controlled by adjusting flow rate of propane gas, diffusion time, and carburization temperature. The carburization was carried out at two levels of conditions so as to achieve a surface C concentration of 1.5% and 2.5%, respectively.
  • As for Example 3, the carburization was carried over the surface range of C concentration from 0.8 to 3.2%, in order to investigate influences of the surface C concentration.
  • The carburization conditions are as follows.
  • Primary Carburization
  • The test piece was carburized at 1,100° C. for 70 minutes so as to adjust the C concentration to the topmost surface to about 1.2%, and then rapidly cooled by cooling gas to a temperature range as low as 500° C. or below, to thereby allow C to intrude into the steel to at a high concentration range so as not to be causative of precipitation of the carbide.
  • Secondary Carburization
  • The test piece was subjected to the precipitation treatment by keeping it in the temperature range from 850° C. to 900° C., depending on the target carburization concentration, further carburized in the temperature range from 850° C. to 1,000° C. for 60 to 90 minutes depending on the target C concentration, and was hardened by immersing it into an oil bath kept at 130° C. After the hardening, the test place was annealed at 180° C. for 120 minutes.
  • (2-2) Items of Evaluation
  • The following paragraphs will describe items of evaluation. Results of the evaluation are listed in Table 2. Results of Example 3 obtained by varying the surface C concentration are listed in Table 3.
  • Surface C Concentration
  • After the carburization, C concentration was measured using a grinding chip obtained from the surface to a depth of 0.2 mm of the treated test piece.
  • Ratio of Carbide Area
  • The transverse section of the carburized and annealed test piece rod was polished, corroded with picral, to a portion of a depth of 50 μm from the topmost surface was photographed under a SEM (at a 3,000× magnification of observation), and the ratio of area was measured by image analysis.
  • Size of Carbide
  • The test piece was observed under the same conditions as described in the above, and the area ratio occupied by the carbide grain sized 10 μm or less was measured.
  • Presence or Absence of Network-Structured Carbide
  • The test piece was observed under the same conditions as those described in the above, and presence or absence of the network-structured carbide was investigated.
  • Presence or Absence of Incompletely-Hardened Structure
  • The transverse section of the carburized, annealed test piece rod was polished, corroded with nital, to a portion of a depth of 50 μm from the topmost surface was photographed under an optical microscope, and presence or absence of the incompletely-hardened structure was investigated.
  • Depth of Grain Boundary Oxide Layer
  • The transverse section of the carburized and annealed rod test piece was polished, the resultant surface in an uncorroded state was observed under an optical microscope, and the depth of the layer appearing as black along the grain boundary at the topmost surface was measured.
  • Temper Softening Resistance
  • The carburized and annealed test piece rod was further annealed at 300° C. for 180 minutes, the transverse section was polished, and the hardness at a depth of 50 μm from the topmost surface was measured. The hardness herein conforms to JIS Z 2244 (Hv0.3), wherein a value of Hv750 or above is considered as an index ensuring a sufficient effect of improving the strength (≧30%: in comparison with SCR420 gas eutectic carburized steel).
    TABLE 2
    Carburization (1) [targeted at 1.5% C.]
    Ratio of Ratio of area Incompletely- Depth of grain
    Anneal Surface C carbide of grains Network- hardened boundary oxide 300° C. temper
    hardness concentration area ≦10 μm structured carbide structure layer hardness
    Example 1 83 1.62 21% 100% no no no 775
    Example 2 81 1.62 20% 93% no no no 751
    Example 3 84 1.51 19% 100% no no no 779
    Example 4 84 1.53 21% 100% no no no 787
    Example 5 89 1.41 16% 100% no no no 760
    Example 6 84 1.65 21% 100% no no no 773
    Example 7 83 1.61 23% 99% no no no 780
    Example 8 88 1.75 29% 94% no no no 807
    Example 9 90 1.65 24% 100% no no no 802
    Example 10 90 1.61 23% 100% no no no 800
    Comparative 79 1.59 22% 100% no no no 776
    Example 1
    Comparative 92 1.61 22% 100% no no no 776
    Example 2
    Comparative 76 1.65 22% 45% yes no no 729
    Example 3
    Comparative 97 1.31 13% 100% no no no 734
    Example 4
    Comparative 80 1.62 20% 100% no no no 735
    Example 5
    Comparative 93 1.64 23% 100% no no no 779
    Example 6
    Comparative 80 1.51 20% 100% no yes no 743
    Example 7
    Comparative 91 1.83 32% 91% no no no 814
    Example 8
    Comparative 99 1.69 26% 94% no no no 814
    Example 9
    Comparative 100 1.68 25% 100% no no no 816
    Example 10
    Carburization (2) [targeted at 2.5% C.]
    Ratio of Ratio of area Network- Incompletely- Depth of grain 300° C.
    Surface C carbide of grains structured hardened boundary oxide temper
    concentration area ≦10 μm carbide structure layer hardness Remarks
    Example 1 2.53 40% 97% no no no 824
    Example 2 2.52 52% 93% no no no 835
    Example 3 2.45 49% 95% no no no 843
    Example 4 2.64 55% 98% no no no 863
    Example 5 2.31 35% 94% no no no 828
    Example 6 2.47 37% 97% no no no 817
    Example 7 2.74 52% 94% no no no 845
    Example 8 2.83 58% 92% no no no 875
    Example 9 2.56 52% 98% no no no 861
    Example 10 2.58 50% 99% no no no 845
    Comparative 2.48 41% 98% no no no 825
    Example 1
    Comparative 2.51 40% 95% no no no 825 poor machinability
    Example 2
    Comparative 2.61 43% 36% yes no no 825 carbide shape control
    Example 3 failure,
    poor strength
    Comparative 1.92 27% 99% no no no 800 poor machinability,
    Example 4 poor carburization,
    poor strength
    Comparative 2.46 38% 98% no yes no 778 poor hardening,
    Example 5 poor strength
    Comparative 2.51 36% 98% no no no 814 poor machinability
    Example 6
    Comparative 2.44 34% 95% no yes no 796 poor hardening,
    Example 7 poor strength
    Comparative 2.98 66% 81% yes no no 892 poor machinability,
    Example 8 carbide shape control
    failure
    Comparative 2.61 56% 95% no no no 875 poor machinability
    Example 9
    Comparative 2.56 54% 98% no no no 860 poor machinability
    Example 10
  • It is known from Table 2 that all of the Examples from 1 to 10 raise no problem in the manufacturability (anneal hardness≦HRB90), show no incomplete-hardened structure, network-structured carbide and grain boundary oxidation causative of degradation in the hardness, and give sufficient levels of temper hardness (≧750Hv) at 300° C. In contrast, Comparative Examples 2, 4, 6 and 8 to 10 show large hardness after annealing, and raise a problem in the manufacturability. Comparative Examples 3 and 8 show only insufficient control levels of fine dispersion of the carbide due to a low Si and a large Cr content, and production of the network-structured carbide and other coarse carbide may undesirably degrade the strength. Comparative Example 4, too large in the Si content, raises a problem in the manufacturability, inhibits the carburization property, and cannot allow the carburization to proceed to a sufficient degree. Comparative Examples 5 and 7, low in the Cr and Mn contents, which give only poor levels of hardening property, show the incompletely-hardened structure, and may undesirably degrade the strength.
    TABLE 3
    Surface C Ratio of Ratio of area Network-
    C Si Mn Cr Mo V concentration carbide area of grains ≦10 μm structured carbide
    Example 3 0.19 1.02 0.52 2.52 0.00 0.00 ↓ 0.80  ↓ 0%  ↓ 0% no
    ↓ 1.11  ↓ 12%  100% no
    1.51 19% 100% no
    1.99 34% 100% no
    2.45 47%  95% no
    ↑ 3.15  ↑ 67%  ↓ 64%  yes
    Incompletely- Depth of grain 300° C. temper Ratio of surface
    hardened structure boundary oxide layer hardness fatigue strength Remarks
    Example 3 no no 644 1.09 poor strength
    no no 734 1.23 poor strength
    no no 779 1.43
    no no 816 1.45
    no no 843 1.55
    no no 894 1.28 carbide shape
    Failure, poor
    strength
  • It is known from Table 3 that the carburization targeted at a surface C concentration of less than 1.2% is successful in improving the surface fatigue strength, but unsuccessful in obtaining a sufficient effect for improving the strength (≧30%). On the other hand, the carburization targeted at a surface concentration exceeding 3.0% is successful in obtaining a sufficient level of 300° C. temper hardness, but shows the network-structured carbide and coarse carbide, and is unsuccessful in obtaining a sufficient effect for improving the strength.
  • (3) Evaluation of Surface Fatigue Strength
  • The surface fatigue strength was evaluated using a roller pitting tester, wherein the surface fatigue strength was defined as the pressure on the load surface not causative of pitting over 107 cycles of the test. More specifically, a 32-mm-diameter round rod was softened by keeping it heated at 950° C., followed by gradual cooling, and was then machined to fabricate a roller pitting test piece having a diameter of test portion of 26 mm. A roller correspondent to the test piece was configured using SUJ2, and subjected to quench-and-temper so as to attain a hardness of HRC61. The radii of curvature of large rollers are 150R and 700R.
  • The carburization was simultaneously carried out with the carburization carried out for basic evaluation of the inventive steel. A portion of the roller pitting test piece after the carburization was tempered at 300° C. for 3 hours, and evaluation was also made on the carbon concentration, ratio of the carbide area, the maximum carbide size and temper hardness. The surface fatigue strength of each material was expressed by an index, assuming the surface fatigue strength of gas-eutectic-carburized JIS-SCR420 material is 1.0. A sufficient effect of improving the strength by 30% or more as compared with gas-eutectic-carburized JIS-SCR420H steel was targeted.
  • Results of the evaluation are listed in Table 4.
    TABLE 4
    Roller pitting test
    Incompletely- Depth of grain
    Surface C Ratio of Ratio of area Network- hardened boundary oxide
    concentration carbide area of grains ≦10 μm structured carbide structure layer
    Example 1 2.04 33% 100% no no no
    Example 2 2.13 30% 98% no no no
    Example 3 1.99 34% 100% no no no
    Example 4 2.08 40% 100% no no no
    Example 5 1.94 31% 97% no no no
    Example 6 2.00 32% 98% no no no
    Example 7 2.34 33% 94% no no no
    Example 8 2.49 46% 94% no no no
    Example 9 2.15 34% 100% no no no
    Example 10 2.13 37% 99% no no no
    Comparative Example 1 2.01 32% 100% no no no
    Comparative Example 2 2.03 33% 100% no no no
    Comparative Example 3 2.20 29% 69% yes no no
    Comparative Example 4 1.83 24% 100% no no no
    Comparative Example 5 2.01 30% 96% no yes no
    Comparative Example 6 1.95 29% 98% no no no
    Comparative Example 7 2.10 30% 97% no yes no
    Comparative Example 8 2.61 54% 88% yes no no
    Comparative Example 9 2.19 39% 98% no no no
    Comparative Example 10 2.12 42% 99% no no no
    Comparative Example 11 0.78 0% 0% 0% no 8 μm
    Roller pitting test
    300° C. temper Surface fatigue
    hardness strength Remarks
    Example 1 805 1.44
    Example 2 798 1.40
    Example 3 816 1.45
    Example 4 825 1.51
    Example 5 800 1.49
    Example 6 804 1.46
    Example 7 813 1.43
    Example 8 841 1.54
    Example 9 832 1.52
    Example 10 823 1.49
    Comparative Example 1 806 0.93 poor strength of core portion
    Comparative Example 2 805 1.46 poor machinability
    Comparative Example 3 782 1.17 carbide shape control failure, poor strength
    Comparative Example 4 781 1.47 poor machnability, poor carburization
    Comparative Example 5 766 1.15 poor hardening, poor strength
    Comparative Example 6 796 1.41 poor machinability
    Comparative Example 7 769 1.18 poor hardening, poor strength
    Comparative Example 8 861 1.29 poor machinability, carbide shape control failure
    Comparative Example 9 845 1.57 poor machinability
    Comparative Example 10 838 1.53 poor machinability
    Comparative Example 11 620 1.00 JIS-SCR20 (base steel)-gas carburizaton
  • It is known from Table 4 that all of the Examples from 1 to 10 are successful in obtaining sufficient levels (≧30%) of improvement in the strength. In contrast, Comparative Example 1 show only a low strength due to poor strength of the core portion. Comparative Examples 2, 4, 6, 9 and 10 are successful in sufficiently improving the strength, but raise a problem in the manufacturability. Comparative Examples 3 and 8 show growth of the network-structured carbide and other coarse carbide, and fail in obtaining sufficient levels of effect for improving the strength. Comparative Examples 5 and 7, having low contents of Cr and Mn, show only poor hardening properties as indicated by the incompletely-hardened structure, and fail in obtaining sufficient levels of effect for improving the strength.
  • As proven by the above-described tests, the carburized component of this invention was confirmed as having a large amount of fine carbide grains precipitated in the surficial portion thereof, as being substantially free from the grain boundary oxide layer in the surficial portion, and being excellent in the areas of surface hardness and strength.
  • FIG. 1A
  • primary carburization
  • secondary carburization
  • FIG. 1B, FIG. 3
  • γ single phase
  • FIG. 2
  • between d-e
  • precipitation of fine carbide grains
  • between e-f
  • growth of carbide grains

Claims (5)

1. A carburized component consisting essentially of, in % by mass and both ends inclusive, C: 0.1-0.30%, Si: 0.80-1.50%, Mn: 0.30-1.20%, Cr: 2.0-5.5%, and the balance of Fe and inevitable impurities;
having a mean C concentration over the range from the surface of the steel to a depth of 0.2 mm after vacuum carburization of 1.2% or more and 3.0% or less, having a ratio of carbide area over the range from the surface to a depth of 50 μm of 15% or more and 60% or less, having the carbide precipitated in a finely dispersed manner so that the carbide having a grain size of 10 μm or less accounts for 90% or more of the entire portion, and having a depth of a grain boundary oxide layer of 1 μm or less.
2. The carburized component as claimed in claim 1, further comprising either or both of Mo: 0.2 to 1.0% and V: 0.2 to 1.0%.
3. A method of manufacturing a carburized component described in claim 1, subjecting steel containing the above-described steel ingredients to a primary carburization at a temperature of Acm or above, then rapidly cooling the steel to as low as point A1 or below, and then subjecting the steel to a secondary carburization at a temperature of point A1 or above and or Acm below.
4. The method of manufacturing a carburized component as claimed in claim 3, wherein the carburization is carried out by vacuum carburization at 1,000 Pa or below.
5. The method of manufacturing a carburized component as claimed in claim 3, further subjecting the steel to peening after the secondary carburization.
US11/296,566 2004-12-10 2005-12-08 Carburized component and method of manufacturing the same Abandoned US20060130935A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004-358617 2004-12-10
JP2004358617A JP4188307B2 (en) 2004-12-10 2004-12-10 Carburized parts and manufacturing method thereof

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060130935A1 true US20060130935A1 (en) 2006-06-22

Family

ID=36590721

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/296,566 Abandoned US20060130935A1 (en) 2004-12-10 2005-12-08 Carburized component and method of manufacturing the same

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20060130935A1 (en)
JP (1) JP4188307B2 (en)
DE (1) DE102005058903B4 (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070246126A1 (en) * 2006-04-20 2007-10-25 Daido Steel Co., Ltd. Carburized component and manufacturing method thereof
WO2008124239A1 (en) * 2007-04-06 2008-10-16 Swagelok Company Hybrid carburization with intermediate rapid quench
EP2085493A4 (en) * 2006-11-06 2009-11-25 Honda Motor Co Ltd Process for producing high-concentration carburized steel
US20100037991A1 (en) * 2007-04-05 2010-02-18 Swagelok Company Diffusion promoters for low temperature case hardening
US20100159235A1 (en) * 2008-12-18 2010-06-24 Scott Alan Johnston Wear component with a carburized case
WO2010071014A1 (en) * 2008-12-19 2010-06-24 Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha Connecting rod, internal combustion engine, transportation apparatus, and method of producing connecting rod
US20110030849A1 (en) * 2009-08-07 2011-02-10 Swagelok Company Low temperature carburization under soft vacuum
US9617632B2 (en) 2012-01-20 2017-04-11 Swagelok Company Concurrent flow of activating gas in low temperature carburization
US11326220B2 (en) 2018-06-18 2022-05-10 Komatsu Ltd. Method for producing machine component

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2010007117A (en) * 2008-06-25 2010-01-14 Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd Method for manufacturing high-strength carburized component
JP2011179026A (en) * 2010-02-26 2011-09-15 Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd Steel for large toothed gear superior in repeating-shock resistance
JP5569588B2 (en) 2010-09-09 2014-08-13 トヨタ自動車株式会社 gear
JP6432932B2 (en) * 2014-09-01 2018-12-05 山陽特殊製鋼株式会社 High strength and high toughness steel parts for machine structures excellent in pitting resistance and wear resistance and method for manufacturing the same

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040182480A1 (en) * 2003-03-20 2004-09-23 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. High-strength carburized part and a method of the same

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3006034B2 (en) * 1990-05-30 2000-02-07 日産自動車株式会社 High strength mechanical structural members with excellent surface pressure strength
JP3219167B2 (en) * 1992-11-17 2001-10-15 大同特殊鋼株式会社 Manufacturing method of high surface pressure parts
JP3308377B2 (en) * 1994-03-09 2002-07-29 大同特殊鋼株式会社 Gear with excellent tooth surface strength and method of manufacturing the same

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040182480A1 (en) * 2003-03-20 2004-09-23 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. High-strength carburized part and a method of the same

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7967921B2 (en) 2006-04-20 2011-06-28 Daido Steel Co., Ltd. Carburized component and manufacturing method thereof
US20070246126A1 (en) * 2006-04-20 2007-10-25 Daido Steel Co., Ltd. Carburized component and manufacturing method thereof
EP2085493A4 (en) * 2006-11-06 2009-11-25 Honda Motor Co Ltd Process for producing high-concentration carburized steel
US20100126632A1 (en) * 2006-11-06 2010-05-27 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Manufacturing method for high-concentration carburized steel
US20100037991A1 (en) * 2007-04-05 2010-02-18 Swagelok Company Diffusion promoters for low temperature case hardening
WO2008124239A1 (en) * 2007-04-06 2008-10-16 Swagelok Company Hybrid carburization with intermediate rapid quench
US20100116377A1 (en) * 2007-04-06 2010-05-13 Swagelok Company Hybrid carburization with intermediate rapid quench
US20100159235A1 (en) * 2008-12-18 2010-06-24 Scott Alan Johnston Wear component with a carburized case
WO2010071014A1 (en) * 2008-12-19 2010-06-24 Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha Connecting rod, internal combustion engine, transportation apparatus, and method of producing connecting rod
US20110030849A1 (en) * 2009-08-07 2011-02-10 Swagelok Company Low temperature carburization under soft vacuum
US9212416B2 (en) 2009-08-07 2015-12-15 Swagelok Company Low temperature carburization under soft vacuum
US10156006B2 (en) 2009-08-07 2018-12-18 Swagelok Company Low temperature carburization under soft vacuum
US10934611B2 (en) 2009-08-07 2021-03-02 Swagelok Company Low temperature carburization under soft vacuum
US9617632B2 (en) 2012-01-20 2017-04-11 Swagelok Company Concurrent flow of activating gas in low temperature carburization
US10246766B2 (en) 2012-01-20 2019-04-02 Swagelok Company Concurrent flow of activating gas in low temperature carburization
US11035032B2 (en) 2012-01-20 2021-06-15 Swagelok Company Concurrent flow of activating gas in low temperature carburization
US11326220B2 (en) 2018-06-18 2022-05-10 Komatsu Ltd. Method for producing machine component

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102005058903A1 (en) 2006-07-06
JP2006161141A (en) 2006-06-22
JP4188307B2 (en) 2008-11-26
DE102005058903B4 (en) 2017-04-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR100514120B1 (en) High-strength spring steel and spring steel wire
KR101129370B1 (en) Carbonitrided induction-hardened steel part with excellent rolling contact fatigue strength at high temperature and process for producing the same
EP2058411B1 (en) High strength heat-treated steel wire for spring
EP3276040B1 (en) Nitrided or soft nitrided part with excellent wear resistance and pitting resistance
WO2014171472A1 (en) Case-hardening steel material and case-hardening steel member
EP2530178A1 (en) Case-hardened steel and carburized material
EP2562283A1 (en) Steel component having excellent temper softening resistance
JP4687616B2 (en) Steel carburized or carbonitrided parts
US20060130935A1 (en) Carburized component and method of manufacturing the same
JP6950821B2 (en) Machine parts and their manufacturing methods
US7967921B2 (en) Carburized component and manufacturing method thereof
JP2008261037A (en) Steel carburized or carbonitrided parts with shot peening
JP6766362B2 (en) Skin-baked steel with excellent coarse grain prevention characteristics, fatigue characteristics, and machinability during carburizing and its manufacturing method
JP4464862B2 (en) Case-hardening steel with excellent grain coarsening resistance and cold workability that can be omitted for soft annealing.
EP3020841B1 (en) Coil spring, and method for manufacturing same
US11952668B2 (en) Carburized part and method for manufacturing same
JP6922415B2 (en) Carburized parts
KR20100077250A (en) High-strength spring steel and
TWI630278B (en) Surface hardened steel
JP3644217B2 (en) Induction-hardened parts and manufacturing method thereof
JP4488228B2 (en) Induction hardening steel
JP4464861B2 (en) Case hardening steel with excellent grain coarsening resistance and cold workability
JP5821512B2 (en) NITRIDED COMPONENT AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
JP6828593B2 (en) Carburized parts
JP2005120479A (en) High strength spring and manufacturing method thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD., JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HATTORI, ATSUSHI;KANO, TAKASHI;SERIKAWA, TOMOKO;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:017600/0828;SIGNING DATES FROM 20051123 TO 20051212

Owner name: DAIDO STEEL CO., LTD., JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HATTORI, ATSUSHI;KANO, TAKASHI;SERIKAWA, TOMOKO;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:017600/0828;SIGNING DATES FROM 20051123 TO 20051212

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载