US20050137400A1 - Phosphorescent Osmium (II) complexes and uses thereof - Google Patents

Abstract

There is disclosed herein phosphorescent compounds, uses thereof, and devices including organic light emitting diode (OLEDs) including such compounds.
Compounds of interest include:

wherein A is Os or Ru The anionic chelating chromophores N{circumflex over ( )}N, which are formed by connecting one pentagonal ring structure containing at least two nitrogen atoms to a hexagonal pyridine type of fragment via a direct carbon-carbon linkage. L is a neutral donor ligand; the typical example includes carbonyl, pyridine, phosphine, arsine and isocyanide; two neutral L's can also combine to produce the so-called chelating ligand such as 2,2′-bipyridine, 1,10-phenanthroline and N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) ligand, or bidentate phosphorous ligands such as 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane, 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)benzene. L can occupy either cis or trans orientation. When L occupies the trans position, the preferred structure contains both the hexagonal fragment of NAN as well as its pentagonal fragment located at the trans position respect to their counterparts of the second NAN chromophore. When L occupies the cis position, the preferred structure consists of the pentagonal unit of N{circumflex over ( )}N chromophores residing opposite to the L.

X₁, X₂ and X₃ independently are C or N;

• • when X₂ is N, R, is omitted,
  • when X₃ is N, R₂ is omitted,
  • R₁ is H, C1-C8 alkyl, C1-C8 substituted phenyl or C1-C4 perfluoroalkyl,
  • R₂ is H, F or cyano substituent,
  • X₄ is either C or N;
  • X₄ may locate at any position of the hexagonal ring, when X₄ is N and R₃ and R₄ are not linked to X₄,
  • R₃ is H, methyl or C1-C3 small alkyl, R₄ is H, methyl or C1-C3 small alkyl, or R₃ and
  • R₄ together form an additional conjugated unit with structure
    

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
• The invention relates to phosphorescent compounds and uses thereof.
BACKGROUND
• It has long been felt that a technically viable emissive display technology could compete with the currently dominating technology of liquid crystal displays (LCDs), and OLEDs are presently considered well placed to do so. While the technology of LCDs has various limitations such as low efficiency, poor viewing angles, slow switching speed and narrow temperature ranges, the main advantages of OLEDs are full color, high efficiency, large viewing angles, high switching speed, and low operational temperature. Therefore, organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) and polymer light emitting diodes (PLEDs) have attracted a tremendous amount of research interests from both academia and industry in the past decade. New light emitting devices based on organic materials are researched and engineered for both display applications and general solid-state lighting. A lot of work is going on in chemistry laboratories to find materials with high luminous quantum efficiency, good color purity and great stability for the application to OLED displays. While some materials meet or exceed some of the requirements for commercial displays, none are believed to meet them all. Efficient and stable red and blue emitters are especially lacking.
• Most organic or polymer light emitting diodes emit light through the radiative decay of singlet excitons. As the electron-hole recombination with uncorrelated spins has 75% probability to yield spin symmetric (S=1) state and 25% for spin asymmetric state (S=0), therefore the maximum internal quantum efficiency for the OLEDs and PLEDs using fluorescence as emission mechanism is capped at 25% (photon/electron). Any attempt to further enhance the internal efficiency has to resort to harvesting the triplet excitons in the devices [Baldo, M. A. et al., Nature 1998, 395, 151]. Organometallic complexes containing the third-row transition metal elements such as Os(II), Ir(III) and Pt(II) are crucial materials for this attempt. The strong spin-orbit coupling induced by these heavy metal ions promotes an efficient intersystem crossing from the singlet to the triplet state, which then facilitates high internal quantum efficiencies (η_int) for the OLED devices by using both singlet and triplet excitons. In this regard, numerous attempts have been made to exploit third-row transition metal complexes as dopant emitters for OLED fabrication, among which quite a few Pt(II) and Ir(III) metal complexes have been reported to exhibit highly efficient OLED and PLED device performances.
• The design and synthesis of red emitting complexes is intrinsically difficult because their luminescence quantum yield tends to their ionic nature observed in the traditional design involving Os(II) complexes such as [Os(bpy)₃][PF₆]₂, where bpy=2,2′-bipyridine; [Carlson, B. et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14162]. The OLED devices prepared from [Os(bpy)₃][PF₆]₂ and the related derivatives suffered inferior performances compared with the neutral Pt(II) and Ir(III) counterparts; [(a) Lamansky, S. et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4304, and (b) Brooks, J. et al., Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 3055]. This is, in part, attributed to the lack of strong covalent bonding between the cationic Os(II) emitting complexes and their counter anions within the host matrix. The positively charged Os(II) fragments and their counter anions may undergo significant drifting under high electric field during device operation towards the cathode and the anode, respectively, leading to instability in device performance and a relatively long response time. Accordingly, it is proposed that only the utilization of neutral Os(II) emitting materials, can the goal of practical OLED applications be achieved. In this patent application, we propose the design and preparation of a new series of Os(II) emitting complexes, for which the ligand sphere of the Os(II) atom consists of two anionic chelating ligands such as 3-trifluoromethyl-5-(2-pyridyl) pyrazolate (fppz⁻), 3-trifluoromethyl-5-(2-pyridyl)triazolate (bptz⁻), or even (2-pyridyl) tetrazolate (pyN4⁻) ligand that can neutralize and balance the 2+ charge located at the Os(II) center, and with two donor ligands such as carbonyl, pyridine, bipyridine, arsine, phosphine, and isocyanide ligands to complete the required octahedral coordination arrangement; [Tung, Y.-L. et al., Organometallics 2004, 23, 3745].
• Thus, it is an object of the invention to provide compounds having phosphorescent properties, and uses thereof.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
• The invention provides octahedral Os(II) and Ru(II) complexes of structures I, II and III:

  
• • wherein A is Os or Ru.
• The anionic chelating chromophores N{circumflex over ( )}N, which are formed by connecting one pentagonal ring structure containing at least two nitrogen atoms to a hexagonal pyridine type of fragment via a direct carbon-carbon linkage.
• L stands for a neutral donor ligand; the typical example includes carbonyl, pyridine, phosphine, arsine and isocyanide; two neutral L's can also combine to produce the so-called chelating ligand such as 2,2′-bipyridine, 1,10-phenanthroline and N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) ligand, or bidentate phosphorous ligands such as 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane, 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)benzene.
• L can occupy either cis or trans orientation.
• When L occupies the trans position, the preferred structure contains both the hexagonal fragment of N{circumflex over ( )}N as well as its pentagonal fragment located at the trans position respect to their counterparts of the second N{circumflex over ( )}N chromophore.
• When L occupies the cis position, the preferred structure consists of the pentagonal unit of NAN chromophores residing opposite to the L.
• • X₁, X₂ and X₃ independently are C or N;
  • when X₂ is N, R₁ is omitted,
  • when X₃ is N, R₂ is omitted,
  • R₁ is H, C1-C8 alkyl, C1-C8 substituted phenyl or C1-C4 perfluoroalkyl,
  • R₂ is H, F or cyano substituent,
  • X₄ is either C or N;
  • X₄ may locate at any position of the hexagonal ring, when X₄ is N and R₃ and R₄ are not linked to X₄,
  • R₃ is H, methyl or C1-C3 small alkyl, R₄ is H, methyl or C1-C3 small alkyl, or R₃ and R₄ together form an additional conjugated unit with structure
    
• Also provided are OLEDs comprising compounds of structure I.
• In an embodiment of the invention there is provided the synthesis of the above mentioned light-emitting Osmium(II) complexes described in structure III.
• In an embodiment of the invention there is provided an Organic Light Emitting Diode (OLED), and A Polymer Light Emitting Diode (PLED), including as active material an Osmium(II) complexes described in structure III.
• In an embodiment of the invention there is provided an Organic Light Emitting Diode (OLED), and A Polymer Light Emitting Diode (PLED), including as active material an Osmium(II) complexes described in structure III and with the possible ligands defined therein.
• In an embodiment of the invention there is provided an Organic Light Emitting Diode (OLED), and a Polymer Light Emitting Diode (PLED) as described above, wherein said Os(II) compound or Ru compound is mixed with a second active material. The second active material can be any other suitable electroluminescent material, (e.g. another Os(II) or Ru light-emitting compound, Alq3, derivatives of polyfluorene or oligofluorene, derivatives of polycarbazole or oligocarbazole, derivatives of poly(p-phenylenevinylene or oligo(phenylenevinylene), derivateis of poly(p-phenylene) or oligo(p-phenylene, and etc.). The second active material will in some instances emit at a different wavelength than the Os(II) or Ru compound. (e.g. Alq3, PPV and other polyfluorene derivatives, etc. The second active material can be an electron transport emitter, a hole transport emitter, or a bipolar emitter.
• In an embodiment of the invention there is provided an OLED comprising a hole transport layer, an electron transport layer, and wherein at least one of said hole transport layer and said electron transport layer comprises either alone or in combination as active material such as Osmium(II) complexes described by structure I.
• In an embodiment of the invention there is provided an OLED as described above, further comprising a carrier promotion layer, such as a hole injection layer (HIJL) or an electron injection layer (EIJL) adjacent at least one of said electron transport layer and said hole transport layer.
• In an embodiment of the invention there is provided an OLED as described above, wherein said electron promotion is LiF.
• In an embodiment of the invention there is provided an OLED as described above, wherein said hole promotion is [Poly(ethylene dioxythiophene:polystryrene sulfonate)] (PEDOT-PSS).
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
• FIG. 1 is a depiction of a small-molecule light-emitting diode [C. W. Tang and S. A. VanSlyke, Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 913 (1987)].
• FIG. 2 is a depiction of polymer light-emitting diode [J. H. Burroughes et al., Nature 347, 539 (1990)].
• FIG. 3 is a depiction of an ionic Os complex based phosphorescent dye doped polymer light-emitting diode [J.-H. Kim et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 776 (2003)].
• FIG. 4 shows an embodiment of the invention where an OLED is formed using Os(II) complexes of formula (4) doped PVK thin film as hole transport and emissive layer. The diode consists of an indium tin oxide transparent conductive anode on a glass substrate, Os(II) complex doped PVK as hole transport and emissive layer, Bu-PBD as hole blocking/electron transport layer, a LiF layer as electron injecting layer and an aluminum cathode.
• FIG. 5 is a series of graphical depictions of the electroluminescence spectra, the current-voltage and luminescence-voltage, efficiency-voltage characteristics of the embodiment of FIG. 4.
• FIG. 6 shows an embodiment of the invention where an OLED is formed using using Os(II) complexes of formula (4) doped PVK thin film as hole transport and emissive layer. The diode consists of an indium tin oxide transparent conductive anode on a glass substrate, Os(II) complex doped PVK as hole transport and emissive layer, a F-TBB layer as hole blocking layer, a AlQ₃ layer as electron transport layer, a LiF layer as electron injecting layer and an aluminum cathode.
• FIG. 7 is a pair of graphical depictions of the luminescence-voltage, efficiency-voltage characteristics of the embodiment of FIG. 6.
• FIG. 8 is a depiction of a generic normal fashion OLED/PLED device configuration.
• FIG. 9 is a depiction of a generic “reverse” structured OLED/PLED device configuration.
• FIG. 10 is an ORTEP diagram of Os1.
• FIG. 11 is an UV-vis absorption and normalized PL emission spectra of complexes Os1 (squares), Os2 (triangles), and Os3 (circles) in CH₂Cl₂ at room temperature.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERED EMBODIMENTS
• The present invention provides Os(II) emissive molecules and Ru emissive molecules useful to display luminance when an electric voltage is applied to an OLED or PLED device in which they are employed, and to structures, and correlative molecules of the structures, that optimize the emission intensity and wavelength of the light emitting devices. On electroluminescence, this series of Os(II) or Ru molecules may produce emission which appears as either one of three primary colors of visible light; i.e. blue, green and red. It will be appreciated that, although the invention is described with reference to specific examples, it is not so limited, but is limited only by the attached claims. Moreover, although the description may make reference to possible mechanisms or modes of action, the invention is not limited to any given mechanism or mode of action.

  
• The ligands (2-pyridyl) pyrazole, (2-pyridyl)triazole and even (2-pyridyl) tetrazole can react with Os₃(CO)₁₂ to afford Os(II) metal complexes 1. The carbonyl ligands always adopt the cis geometry, and the trans-position to the CO ligands can be occupied by the anionic pyrazolate, triazolate or tetrazolate group. Moreover, the related Os(II) complexes of type 2 possess the CO ligands at the coordinative trans-position to the 2-pyridyl fragments can also be isolated as the co-products of lower yields.

  

  
• The hydrocarbon substituent R¹ can be methyl, methoxyl, dimethylamino, trifluoromethyl, t-butyl and phenyl group, while second R² can be methyl, methoxyl or any other organic functional groups so that tuning of the emission color can be successfully achieved. There is not restriction to the relative position of R² group on the 2-pyridyl fragment, as it can be located at all four possible positions of the 2-pyridyl fragment. Moreover, the hydrogen atom of the ligated pyrazolate fragments in 1a and 2a can be replaced by other small alkyl or aryl substituents, halide or pseudohalide group such as fluoride, chloride or even cyano functional group. The emission spectrum of these complexes shows the intra-ligand ππ* absorption band with distinct vibronic feature in the range 450˜510 nm in both solid and fluid state. As a result, they could be served as the blue or cyanide blue phosphorescent emitters for various OLED applications. Fine adjustment of the emission color can be achieved by ligand functionalization. For example, substituting of R¹ group at the pyrazolate or triazolate fragment with certain strong electron withdrawing group would stabilize the HOMO of the chelating ligand. It would bring about the intra-ligand ππ* charge transfer transitions with higher energy, as can be seen from the hypsochromic shift in the ³ππ* phosphorescence spectra for this series of complexes. Concomitantly, substituting of R² group of 2-pyridyl group with strong electron donating property destabilizes the LUMO and also achieved the similar hypsochromic shift. The mechanistical aspects of color tuning as well as the photophysical properties of some related Os(II) metal complexes may be found in the article published by us; [Wu, P.-C. et al., Organometallics 2003, 22, 4938]. Absorption and emission properties of several Os(II) complexes with cis-arranged CO ligands are depicted in Table 1, while their individual molecular structures are given in Scheme 1.
• The carbonyl ligands of complexes 1 and 2 can be replaced by a bidentate diamine or diimine ligand (N{circumflex over ( )}N), such as ethylenediamine, tetramethylethylenediamine, 2,2′-bipyridine, 1,10-phenanthroline, 2-(2′-pyridyl) benzoxazole and their alkyl or aryl substituted derivatives, to afford complexes of type 3. These Os(II) complexes will retain the octahedral coordination arrangement with the nitrogen atoms occupying the original positions of the cis-CO ligands in both complexes 1 and 2. As the electron donor strength of the diimine ligands is far better than the π-acidic CO ligand, substantial red shift of phosphorescent emission compared with complexes 1 and 2 is expected.

  
• Furthermore, upon treatment of complexes 1 and 2 with Me₃NO to remove the carbonyl ligands, followed by addition of donor ligand P such as phosphine, phosphite or arsine, the complexes of types 4 can be obtained in good yields. The cis-carbonyl arrangement has changed to the trans-donor ligand disposition during the substitution reaction. These complexes possess two (2-pyridyl) pyrazolate, triazolate or tetrazolate ligands located at the mutual planar position, and their emission is centered in the lower energy range of 610˜660 nm, depending on the substituents R¹ and R² and the phosphine donor ligand P employed. This structural property has been unambiguously confirmed by the single crystal X-ray structural determination studies;

  
• The donor ligand P can be the phosphine ligand such as: PPh₃, PPh₂Me, PPhMe₂ and PMe₃, the phosphite ligand such as: P(OPh)₃ and P(OMe)₃, or even the arsine ligand such as AsPh₃ and AsMe₃. The PPh₃ derivatives tend to be less stable upon dissolution in organic solvents, compared with the Os(II) complexes possessing the slightly smaller and more electron donating phosphine ligands such as PPh₂Me and PPhMe₂. The emission wavelength is proportional to their relative donor strength; i.e. higher the donor strength, longer the emission wavelength. This is because that the observed phosphorescence originates primarily from the ³MLCT state, where the significant overlap of the 0-0 onsets between emission and the lowest energy absorption band, in combination with a relatively broad, structureless emission profile, provides the additional support to this spectral assignment. Absorption and emission properties of several Os(II) complexes with the trans-substituted phosphine ligands are depicted in Table 2. The summary of their molecular structures important for our current research is given in Scheme 2. It is notable that the compounds have shown short triplet lifetime in the microsecond range and different color emission between orange and deep red, and may also possess distinctive chemical properties. Thus, the modification to the basic structure in these molecules can systematically alter the emissive and chemical properties in desirable ways.
• One can also use the above donor ligand containing at least one unsaturated functional group such as vinyl or allyl group, so that the resulting osmium complexes can be attached to a higher molecular weight polymer at the later stage. We may also use a polymer bound donor group so that we can incorporated our Os(II) fragment directly to the polymer. Moreover, derivations of these Os(II) complexes can be conducted using the established methods, for example, we can prepare the Os(II) complexes with a C—C double bond side chain, so that preparation of a doped copolymer will become feasible.

  
• The Os(II) metal complexes may also contain structures represented by any one of the formula 5. It is notable that the phosphorous atoms of the bidentate phosphine chelates preferably reside at the cis-disposition around the Os(II) metal center, which differs greatly from that depicted in the previous molecular formula 4, and the additional R³ represents the alkyl and aryl substituents required for the diphosphine chelates employed. OLED and PLED devices fabricated using these Os(II) complexes would exhibit advantages such as good luminescence efficiency and good durability. The emission wavelength of complexes 5 would be more blue shifted compared with the diimine analogues 3, as the phosphorus atom appears to be a better π-acid compared with the nitrogen donor atom of diimine ligands.
• Moreover, other monoanionic chelating ligands may also be used in this invention to synthesize the Os(II) metal complexes showing the desired structural formula 1˜5. Specific examples are illustrated below, using (2-pyridyl) pyrazolate ligand as reference to illustrate our basic design principle. (2-pyridyl) pyrazolate 2-pyrazine

  
• One may have other heterocyclic aromatic fragment to replace the 2-pyridyl fragment in building up all the required bidentate ligand. For example, the new heterocyclic fragment may consist of 2-pyrazine, 2-pyrimidine, 3-pyridazine, 2-quinoline and 1-isoquinoline molecule. Connecting these heterocyclic fragment to the above mentioned pyrazolate, triazolate or tetrazolate anionic fragment would produce an expended series of new chelating ligands that are equally suitable for synthesizing the required Os(II) emitters. Additional of an extra nitrogen atom to the backbone of 2-pyridyl fragment, e.g. giving formation of 2-pyrazine, 2-pyrimidine and 3-pyridazine group, is expected to cause a red-shifted emission compared with the Os(II) complexes possessing the parent (2-pyridyl) pyrazolate ligands. Incorporation of 2-quinoline and 1-isoquinoline fragment via increase the aromatic 1-conjugation would also induce the similar bathochromatic shifting as expected from the basic photophysical theory. Moreover, the pyrazolate fragment can also be replaced by a bicyclic indazolate unit, for which greater solubility is expected due to the lipophilic cyclic hydrocarbon substituent. We expect that using this systematic tuning method would lead to the isolation of a wide range of highly emissive Os(II) based emitting materials.
• The device shown in FIG. 1 consists of a transparent Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) anode on a glass substrate, an aromatic diamine as the hole transport layer, an AlQ₃ (8-hydroxyquinoline aluminum) electron transport and emitter layer, and a Mg:Ag alloy cathode. When a sufficiently positive voltage is applied between the anode and the cathode, holes are injected from the anode, electrons are injected from the cathode and they recombine radiatively in the AlQ₃ emissive layer, producing light that is seen through the transparent anode and hole transport layer.
• The device shown in FIG. 2 consists of a transparent ITO anode on a glass substrate, a thin PPV (poly(p-phenylenevinylene)) layer, and an Al cathode. When a sufficiently high positive voltage is applied between the anode and the cathode, holes are injected from the anode, electrons are injected from the cathode and they recombine radiatively in the PPV emissive layer, producing light that is seen through the transparent anode.
• The device shown in FIG. 3 consists of a transparent ITO anode on a glass substrate, a BTPD-PFCB hole transport layer, an ionic Os(II) compound doped PF-TPA-OXD emissive layer, and a Ca/Ag cathode. Under a positive bias voltage, efficient electroluminescent emission was observed. In this device count ions were present with the Os compound.
EXPERIMENTS
• Without intending to limit it in any manner, the present invention will be further illustrated by the following examples.
Example 1 Synthesis of [Os(fppz)₂(CO)₂]
• To a 50 mL reaction flask, it was charged with 3-trifluoromethyl-5-(2-pyridyl) pyrazole (fppzH, 296 mg, 1.39 mmol), pulverized Os₃(CO)₁₂ (200 mg, 0.22 mmol), and 25 mL of anhydrous diethylene glycol monoethyl ether. The solution was maintained at 180˜190° C. for 24 hours. After then, the solvent was evaporated and the solid material was sublimed under reduced pressure (300 mtorr/210° C.). The sublimate was further crystallized from a mixture of CH₂Cl₂ and hexane, giving the product [Os(fppz)₂(CO)₂] as colorless needle-like crystals (267 mg, 0.40 mmol) in 60% yield.
• Spectral data: MS (EI, ¹⁹²Os): m/z 672 (M⁺), 616 (M⁺-2CO). IR (CH₂Cl₂): v(CO), 2043 (s), 1973 (s) cm⁻¹. ¹H NMR (500 MHz, d₆-acetone, 294K): δ 9.17 (ddd, J_HH=6.0, 1.5, 1.0 Hz), 8.20 (ddd, J_HH=8.0, 8.0, 1.5 Hz), 8.10 (ddd, J_HH=8.0, 1.5, 1.0 Hz), 7.48 (ddd, J_HH=8.0, 6.0, 1.5 Hz), 7.10 (s). ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, d₆-acetone): δ 177.6 (CO), 157.1 (CH), 155.8 (C), 151.7 (C), 144.1(q, ²J_CF=35.5 Hz, C), 141.3 (CH), 125.2 (CH), 123.1 (q, ¹J_CF=265.7 Hz, CF₃), 121.6 (CH), 103.4 (CH). ¹⁹F NMR (470 MHz, d₆-acetone): δ−60.2 (s). Anal. Calcd. for C₂₀H₁₀F₆N₆O₂Os: C, 35.82; N, 12.53; H, 1.50. Found: C, 35.67; N, 12.84; H, 1.78.
Example 2 Synthesis of [Os(fmpz)₂(CO)₂]
• 3-Trifluoromethyl-5-(4-methyl-2-pyridyl) pyrazole (fmpzH, 240 mg, 1.04 mmol) and finely pulverized Os₃(CO)₁₂ (150 mg, 0.165 mmol) were loaded in a 25 mL Carius tube and degassed. It was then sealed under vacuum and placed in an oven maintained at temperatures 180˜185° C. for 2.5 days, during which time its color changed gradually from light yellow to red-brown and finally to orange yellow. After stopped the reaction, the tube was cooled, opened and the content was dissolved in acetone. The insoluble material was filtered off, and the filtrate was dried under vacuum and the residue was sublimed (0.24 torr, 220° C.). The product was then subjected to recrystallization in CH₂Cl₂ and hexane, giving [Os(fmpz)₂(CO)₂] as colorless needle-like crystals (34 mg, 0.048 mmol) in 29% yield.
• Spectral data: MS (EI, ¹⁹²Os): m/z 700 (M⁺), 644 (M⁺-2CO). IR (CH₂Cl₂): v(CO), 2041 (s), 1970 (s) cm¹. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-acetone, 294K): 8.97 (d, J_HH=6.0 Hz), 7.95 (s), 7.31 (d, J_HH=6.0 Hz), 7.06 (s), 2.58 (s, Me). ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, d₆-acetone, 294K): 177.8 (2CO), 156.2 (2C), 155.2 (2C), 153.7 (2C), 151.8 (2C), 144.0 (q, ²J_CF=35.4 Hz, 2C), 126.2 (2CH), 122.3 (q, ¹J_CF=241.8 Hz, 2CF₃), 122.1 (2CH), 103.1 (2CH), 21.2 (2Me). ¹⁹F NMR (470 MHz, d₆-acetone, 294K): 59.8 (s). Anal. Calcd. For C₂₂H₁₄F₆N₆O₂Os: C, 37.82; N, 12.03; H, 2.02. Found: C, 37.69; N, 12.01; H, 2.08.
Example 3 Synthesis of [Os(bptz)₂(CO)₂]
• To a 50 mL reaction flask, it was charged with 3-t-butyl-5-(2-pyridyl) 1,2,4-triazole (bptzH, 273 mg, 1.35 mmol), pulverized Os₃(CO)₁₂ (200 mg, 0.22 mmol), and 25 mL of anhydrous diethylene glycol monoethyl ether. The solution was maintained at 180° C. for 24 hours. After then, the solvent was evaporated and the residue was washed with water. The crude product was crystallized from a mixture of acetone and hexane, giving [Os(bptz)₂(CO)₂] as colorless block-shaped crystals (309 mg, 0.48 mmol) in 72% yield.
• Spectral data: MS (EI, ¹⁹²Os): m/z 651 (M⁺), 591 (M⁺-2CO). IR (CH₂Cl₂): v(CO), 2041 (s), 1970 (s) cm⁻¹. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, acetone-d₆, 298K): δ 9.16 (dd, J_HH=6.8, 1.2 Hz), 8.25 (ddd, J_HH=7.4, 6.8, 1.2 Hz), 8.10 (dd, J_HH=7.4, 1.2 Hz), 7.55 (ddd, J_HH=6.8, 7.4, 1.2 Hz), 1.12 (s, tBu). Anal. Calcd for C₂₄H₂₆N₈O₂Os: C, 44.43; N, 17.27; H, 4.04. Found: C, 44.26; N, 17.60; H, 4.30.
Example 4 Synthesis of [Os(fptz)₂(CO)₂]
• To a 50 mL reaction flask, it was charged with 3-trifluoromethyl-5-(2-pyridyl) 1,2,4-triazole (fptzH, 298 mg, 1.39 mmol), pulverized Os₃(CO)₁₂ (200 mg, 0.22 mmol), together with 20 mL of anhydrous diethylene glycol monoethyl ether. The solution was maintained at 180˜190° C. for 24 hours. After then, the solvent was evaporated under vacuum, and the residue sublimed under reduced pressure (300 mtorr/220° C.). The sublimate was crystallized from a mixture of CH₂Cl₂ and hexane, giving [Os(fptz)₂(CO)₂] as colorless needle-like crystals (268 mg, 0.40 mmol) in 60% yield.
• Spectral data: MS (EI, ¹⁹²Os): m/z 674 (M⁺), 618 (M⁺(2CO). IR (CH₂Cl₂): v (CO), 2054 (s), 1986 (s) cm(1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 298K): δ 9.01 (dd, JHH=6.7, 0.8 Hz), 8.32 (dd, JHH=7.6, 0.8 Hz), 8.17 (ddd, JHH=7.6, 6.7, 0.8 Hz), 7.51 (ddd, JHH=6.7, 7.6, 0.8 Hz). Anal. Calcd for C18H8F6N8O2Os: C, 32.15; N, 16.66; H, 1.20. Found: C, 32.02; N, 16.87; H, 1.53.
Example 5 Synthesis of [Os(fppz)₂(PPh₂Me)₂], (Os1)
• To a 50 mL reaction flask, it was charged with 3-trifluoromethyl-5-(2-pyridyl) pyrazole (fppzH, 292 mg, 1.37 mmol), pulverized Os₃(CO)₁₂ (200 mg, 0.22 mmol), and 20 mL of anhydrous diethylene glycol monoethyl ether (DGME). The mixture was heated at 180˜190° C. for 24 hours. After then, the temperature was lowered to ˜150° C., freshly sublimed Me₃NO (120 mg, 1.59 mmol) dissolved in 12 mL of DGME was added, and stirring was continued for 5 min. Finally, PPh₂Me (592 μL, 3.18 mmol) was injected into the mixture. In the meantime, the temperature of solution was raised up to 190° C. After 12 hours, the reaction was stopped, the solvent evaporated under vacuum, and the residue washed with distilled water (20 mL (2) to remove the remaining Me3NO. Further purification was conducted using silica gel column chromatography (EA:hexane=1:1), followed by recrystallization from a mixture of EA and hexane at room temperature, giving bright red crystalline solid (436 mg, 0.43 mmol) in 65% yield.
• Spectral data: MS (EI, 192Os): m/z 1014 (M+), 814 (M+-PPh2Me), 616 (M+-2PPh2Me). 1H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-acetone): (10.40 (d, 2H, JHH=6.0 Hz), 7.32 (ddd, 2H, J_HH=7.6, 6.0, 1.2 Hz), 7.15˜6.84 (m, 20H), 6.73 (s, 2H), 6.66˜6.14 (m, 4H), 1.16 (t, 6H, J_HP=3.2 Hz, CH₃). ¹⁹F NMR (470 MHz, d₆-acetone): δ−59.8 (s). ³¹P NMR (202 MHz, d₆-acetone): δ-17.4 (s). Anal. Calcd. for C₄₄H₃₆F₆N₆P₂Os: C, 52.07; N, 8.28; H, 3.58. Found: C, 51.99; N, 8.17; H, 3.78.
Example 6 Synthesis of [Os(fppz)₂(PPhMe₂)₂], (Os2)
• The procedures of EXAMPLE 5 were followed, starting from 3-trifluoromethyl-5-(2-pyridyl) pyrazole (fppzH, 292 mg, 1.37 mmol), powdery Os₃(CO)₁₂ (200 mg, 0.22 mmol), freshly sublimed Me₃NO (125 mg, 1.60 mmol) and phosphine ligand PPhMe₂ (460 μL, 3.19 mmol), the title compound [Os(fppz)₂(PPhMe₂)₂] was obtained as bright red crystalline solid (371 mg, 0.42 mmol); yield: 63%.
• Spectral data: MS (FAB, ¹⁹²Os): m/z 892 (M⁺), 754 (M⁺-PPhMe₂), 616 (M⁺-2PPhMe₂). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-acetone): δ 10.31 (d, 2H, J_HH=6.6 Hz), 7.56˜7.48 (m, 4H), 7.07˜7.03 (m, 2H), 6.94˜6.87 (m, 8H), 6.42˜6.38 (m, 4H), 0.80 (t, 6H, J_HP=3.6 Hz, CH₃), 0.59 (t, 6H, J_HP=3.2 Hz, CH₃). ¹⁹F NMR (470 MHz, d₆-acetone): δ−59.5 (s). ³¹P NMR (202 MHz, d₆-acetone): δ−19.6 (s). Anal. Calcd. for C₃₄H₃₂F₆N₆OsP₂: C, 45.84; N, 9.43; H, 3.62. Found: C, 46.00; N, 9.32; H, 3.81.
Example 7 Synthesis of [Os(fppz)₂(PⁿBu₃)₂]
• The procedures of EXAMPLE 5 were followed, starting from 3-trifluoromethyl-5-(2-pyridyl) pyrazole (fppzH, 148 mg, 0.69 mmol), powdery Os₃(CO)₁₂ (100 mg, 0.11 mmol), freshly sublimed Me₃NO (60 mg, 0.80 mmol) and phosphine ligand PⁿBu₃ (330 μL, 1.32 mmol), the title compound [Os(fppz)₂(PⁿBu₃)₂] was obtained as air sensitive, dark red solid (61 mg, 0.06 mmol); yield: 19%.
• Spectral Data: ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-acetone): δ 10.74 (br, 2H), 7.89 (d, 2H, J_HH=8.0 Hz), 7.79 (dd, 2H, J_HH=8.0, 7.4 Hz), 7.17 (dd, 2H, J_HH=7.4, 6.4 Hz), 7.11 (s, 2H), 0.97˜0.65 (m, 54H, ⁿBu). ¹⁹F NMR (470 MHz, d₆-acetone): δ−59.2 (S). ³¹P NMR (202 MHz, d₆-acetone): δ−24.7 (s).
Example 8 Synthesis of [Os(bppz)₂(PPh₂Me)₂]
• The procedures of EXAMPLE 5 were followed, starting from 3-t-butyl-5-(2-pyridyl) pyrazole (bppzH, 280 mg, 1.39 mmol), powdery Os₃(CO)₁₂ (200 mg, 0.22 mmol), freshly sublimed Me₃NO (118 mg, 1.58 mmol) and phosphine PPh₂Me (595 μL, 3.19 mmol), the title compound [Os(bppz)₂(PPh₂Me)₂] was obtained as dark red crystalline solid (393 mg, 0.40 mmol); yield: 60%.
• Spectral data: MS (FAB, ¹⁹²Os): m/z 992 (M⁺), 792 (M⁺-PPh₂Me), 607 (M⁺-2PPh₂Me). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 10.41 (br, 2H), 7.22 (d, 4H, J_HH=7.2 Hz), 7.08 (dd, 4H, J_HH=7.4, 7.6 Hz), 7.00˜6.97 (m, 6H), 6.87 (d, 2H, J_HH=7.6 Hz), 6.80 (dd, 2H, J_HH=7.6, 7.4 Hz), 6.57˜6.50 (m, 6H), 6.13 (br, 2H), 1.60 (s, 18H), 1.02 (br, 6H). Anal. Calcd. For C₅₀H₅₄N₆OsP₂: C, 60.59; N, 8.48; H, 5.49. Found: C, 60.41; N, 8.57; H, 5.60.
Example 9 Synthesis of [Os(pppz)₂(PPh₂Me)₂]
• The procedures of EXAMPLE 5 were followed, starting from 3-phenyl-5-(2-pyridyl) pyrazole (pppzH, 307 mg, 1.39 mmol), powdery Os₃(CO)₁₂ (200 mg, 0.22 mmol), freshly sublimed Me₃NO (125 mg, 1.61 mmol) and the phosphine PPh₂Me (600 μL, 3.20 mmol), the title compound [Os(pppz)₂(PPh₂Me)₂] was obtained as dark red crystalline solid (375 mg, 0.36 mmol) in 54% yield.
• Analytical data: MS (FAB, ¹⁹²Os): m/z 1032 (M⁺), 831 (M⁺-PPh₂Me), 631 (M⁺-2PPh₂Me). Anal. Calcd. for C₅₄H₄₆N₆OsP₂: C, 62.90; N, 8.15; H, 4.50. Found: C, 62.65; N, 8.02; H, 4.61.
Example 10 Synthesis of [Os(fptz)₂(PPh₃)₂]
• The procedures of EXAMPLE 5 were followed, starting from 3-trifluoromethyl-5-(2-pyridyl) 1,2,4-triazole (fptzH, 298 mg, 1.39 mmol), powdery Os₃(CO)₁₂ (200 mg, 0.22 mmol), freshly sublimed Me₃NO (160 mg, 2.12 mmol) and the phosphine PPh₃ (1.10 g, 4.23 mmol), the title compound [Os(fptz)₂(PPh₃)₂] was obtained as bright orange power (355 mg, 0.31 mmol) in 47% yield.
• Analytical data: MS (FAB, 192Os): m/z 1143 (M⁺), 618 (M⁺-2PPh₃). Anal. Calcd. for C₅₂H₃₈F₆N₈OsP₂: C, 54.73; N, 9.82; H, 3.36. Found: C, 54.85; N, 9.76; H, 3.50.
Example 11 Synthesis of [Os(fptz)₂(PPh₂Me)₂], (Os3)
• The procedures of EXAMPLE 5 were followed, starting from 3-trifluoromethyl-5-(2-pyridyl) 1,2,4-triazole (fptzH, 298 mg, 1.39 mmol), powdery Os₃(CO)₁₂ (200 mg, 0.22 mmol), freshly sublimed Me₃NO (121 mg, 1.59 mmol) and phosphine PPh₂Me (595 μL, 3.19 mmol), the title compound [Os(fptz)₂(PPh₂Me)₂] was obtained as bright red crystalline solid (504 mg, 0.50 mmol) in 75% yield.
• Spectral data: MS (FAB, ¹⁹²Os): m/z 1018 (M⁺), 818 (M⁺—PPh₂Me), 618 (M+-2PPh₂Me). 1H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-acetone): δ 10.26 (d, 2H, J_HH=6.8 Hz), 7.54 (ddd, 2H, JHH=6.8, 7.6, 0.8 Hz), 7.29 (d, 2H, JHH=7.6, 0.8 Hz), 7.21 (ddd, 2H, JHH=7.6, 6.8, 0.8 Hz), 7.24˜7.10 (m, 4H), 7.00 (t, 4H, JHH=7.6 Hz), 6.92 (t, 4H, JHH=7.6 Hz), 6.89˜6.84 (m, 4H), 6.69˜6.60 (m, 4H), 1.24 (t, 6H, JHP=3.4 Hz, CH3). Anal. Calcd. for C₄₂H₃₄F₆N₈OsP₂: C, 49.60; N, 11.02; H, 3.37. Found: C, 49.61; N, 10.98; H, 3.50.
Example 12 Synthesis of [Os(bptz)₂(PPh₂Me)₂]
• The procedures of EXAMPLE 5 were followed, starting from 3-t-butyl-5-(2-pyridyl) 1,2,4-triazole (bptzH, 281 mg, 1.39 mmol), powdery Os₃(CO)₁₂ (200 mg, 0.22 mmol), freshly sublimed Me₃NO (117 mg, 1.57 mmol) and the phosphine PPh₂Me (596 μL, 3.19 mmol), the title compound [Os(bptz)₂(PPh₂Me)₂] was obtained as dark red crystalline solid (401 mg, 0.40 mmol) in 61% yield.
• Spectral data: MS (FAB, 192Os): m/z 994 (M⁺), 794 (M⁺-PPh₂Me), 594 (M⁺-2PPh₂Me). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, d₄-methanol): δ 10.37 (d, 2H, J_HH=4.8 Hz), 7.34 (d, 4H, J_HH=4.8 Hz), 7.09˜6.86 (m, 18H), 6.62˜6.59 (m, 4H), 1.63 (s, 18H, ^tBu), 0.90 (s, 6H, Me). ³¹P NMR (202 MHz, d₄-methanol): δ 19.6 (s).
• Anal. Calcd. for C₄₈H₅₂N₈P₂Os: C, 58.05; N, 11.28; H, 5.28. Found: C, 57.71; N, 11.43; H, 5.40.
Example 13 Synthesis of [Os(hptz)₂(PPh₂Me)₂]
• The procedures of EXAMPLE 5 were followed, starting from 3-heptafluoropropyl-5-(2-pyridyl) 1,2,4-triazole (hppzH, 430 mg, 1.37 mmol), powdery Os₃(CO)₁₂ (200 mg, 0.22 mmol), freshly sublimed Me₃NO (120 mg, 1.59 mmol) and the phosphine PPh₂Me (592 μL, 3.18 mmol), the title compound [Os(hptz)₂(PPh₂Me)₂] was obtained as bright orange crystalline solid (586 mg, 0.48 mmol) in 73% yield.
• Spectral data: MS (FAB, ¹⁹²Os): m/z 1219 (M⁺), 1019 (M⁺-PPh₂Me), 818 (M⁺-2PPh₂Me). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-acetone): δ 10.24 (d, 2H, J_HH=6.8 Hz), 7.49 (dd, 2H, J_HH=6.8, 7.6 Hz), 7.30 (d, 2H, J_HH=7.6 Hz), 7.18˜7.14 (m, 4H), 7.10˜7.03 (m, 10H), 6.88 (t, 4H, J_HH=7.4 Hz), 6.59˜6.55 (m, 4H), 1.22 (t, 6H, JHP=3.2 Hz, CH₃). ¹⁹F NMR (470 MHz, d₆-acetone): δ−122.6 (s, 4F), −109.7 (q, 4F, J_FF=10.0 Hz), −79.8 (t, 6F, J_FF=10.0 Hz). ³¹P NMR (202 MHz, d₆-acetone): δ-18.2 (s). Anal. Calcd for C₄₆H₃₄F₁₄N₈OsP₂: C, 45.40; N, 9.21; H, 2.82. Found: C, 45.41; N, 9.27; H, 2.98.
Example 14 Synthesis of [Os(hptz)₂(PPhMe₂)₂]
• The procedures of EXAMPLE 5 were followed, starting from 3-heptafluoropropyl-5-(2-pyridyl) 1,2,4-triazole (hppzH, 430 mg, 1.37 mmol), powdery Os₃(CO)₁₂ (200 mg, 0.22 mmol), freshly sublimed Me₃NO (122 mg, 1.60 mmol) and the phosphine PPhMe₂ (460 μL, 3.20 mmol), the title compound [Os(hptz)₂(PPhMe₂)₂] was obtained as bright orange crystalline solid (506 mg, 0.46 mmol) in 70% yield.
• Spectral data: MS (FAB, ¹⁹²Os): m/z 1095 (M⁺), 957 (M⁺(PPhMe2), 8618 (M+(2PPhMe2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, d₆-acetone): (10.12 (d, 2H, J_HH=6.4 Hz), 7.73 (dd, 2H, J_HH=6.4, 7.4 Hz), 7.68˜7.65 (m, 2H), 7.20 (ddd, 2H, J_HH=7.4, 6.4, 1.6 Hz), 7.08 (t, 2H, J_HH=7.6 Hz), 6.90 (t, 4H, J_HH=7.6 Hz), 6.38˜6.33 (m, 4H), 0.86 (t, 6H, J_HP=3.2 Hz, CH₃), 0.61 (t, 6H, J_HP=3.2 Hz, CH₃). ¹⁹F NMR (470 MHz, d₆-acetone): δ−126.1 (s, 4F), −110.1 (q, 4F, J_FF=8.3 Hz), −80.0 (t, 6F, J_FF=8.3 Hz). ³¹P NMR (202 MHz, d₆-acetone): δ −22.1(s). Anal. Calcd for C₃₆H₃₀F₁₄N₈OsP₂: C, 39.57; N, 10.25; H, 2.77. Found: C, 39.43; N, 10.20; H, 2.90.
Example 15 Synthesis of [Os(fppz)₂(dppe)]
• 
• To a 50 mL reaction flask, it was charged with 3-trifluoromethyl-5-(2-pyridyl) pyrazole (fppzH, 292 mg, 1.37 mmol), pulverized Os₃(CO)₁₂ (200 mg, 0.22 mmol), and 20 mL of anhydrous diethylene glycol monoethyl ether (DGME). The mixture was heated at 180˜190° C. for 24 hours. After then, the temperature was lowered to ˜150° C., freshly sublimed Me₃NO (150 mg, 2.00 mmol) dissolved in 12 mL of DGME was added, and stirring was continued for 5 min. Finally, cis-1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethylene (dppe, 626 mg, 1.58 mmol) was added into the mixture. In the meantime, the temperature of solution was raised up to 210° C. After 24 hours, the reaction was stopped, the solvent evaporated under vacuum, and the residue washed with distilled water (20 mL×2) to remove the remaining Me₃NO. Further purification was conducted using silica gel column chromatography (EA:hexane=1:1), followed by recrystallization from a mixture of EA and hexane at room temperature, giving yellow crystalline solid (310 mg, 0.31 mmol) in 47% yield.
• Spectral data: MS (FAB, ¹⁹²Os): m/z 1012 (M⁺). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, d₆-acetone): δ 7.91˜7.88 (m, 6H), 7.61 (dd, 2H, J_HH=7.5, 7.8 Hz), 7.54 (d, 2H, J_HH=7.5 Hz), 7.34 (dd, 2H, J_HH=7.8, 7.3 Hz), 7.26˜7.23 (m, 4H), 7.05 (d, 2H, J_HH=7.3 Hz), 7.01 (d, 2H, JHP=6.0 Hz), 6.82 (q, 6H, J_HH=7.4 Hz), 6.71 (s, 2H), 6.69 (t, 4H, J_Hh=7.4 Hz).Anal. Calcd for C₄₄H₃₂F₆N₆OsP₂: C, 52.28; N, 8.31; H, 3.19. Found: C, 52.31; N, 8.27; H, 3.27.
Example 16 Demonstration of Efficient Phosphorescent Polymer Light Emitting Diodes
• In this embodiment of the invention, shown in FIG. 4, three double-layer organic light emitting diodes were fabricated using commercial ITO-coated (120 nm) glass substrates with a sheet resistance of 15 ohm/□ (Applied Films Corp.). The device structure consisted of an Os complex doped PVK layer as the hole-transport and emissive layer (Os(II) complexes Os1: Os(fppz)₂(PPh₂Me)₂, Os2: Os(fppz)₂(PPhMe₂)₂, and Os3: Os(bptz)₂(PPh₂Me)₂ were chosen to be used in three separate devices), spin-coated from its chloroform solution (0.6 mg: 6 mg/ml) at 1500 rpm for 60″. The thickness of the resulting films was measured on a Dektak surface profilometer, and found to be around 60 nm. A vacuum deposited 2-(4-biphenylyl)-5-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole (PBD) layer (20 nm) was used as a hole-blocking/electron transport layer. The device fabrication was completed by the evaporation of LiF (1 nm) and aluminum cathode (150 nm). The electroluminescence spectra, luminance-voltage, efficiency-voltage characteristics of the three devices are shown in FIG. 5 and Table 3. The diodes emit red light with emission peaks in the range of 626 to 658 nm. No excimer or exciplex emission was observed.
Example 17 Further Demonstration of Efficient Phosphorescent Polymer Light Emitting Diodes
• In another embodiment of the invention shown in FIG. 6, a THREE-layer organic light emitting diode was fabricated using commercial ITO-coated (120 nm) glass substrates with a sheet resistance of 15 ohm/n (Applied Films Corp.). The device structure consisted of an Os complex doped PVK layer as the hole-transport and emissive layer (three compounds shown in formula (I) were used in three separate device), spin-coated from its chloroform solution (0.6 mg: 6 mg/ml) at 1500 rpm for 60″. The thickness of the resulting films was measured on a Dektak surface profilometer, and found to be around 60 nm. A vacuum deposited 1,3,5-tris(4′-fluoro-biphenyl-4-yl)benzene (F-TBB) layer (15 nm) was used as a hole-blocking layer and a vacuum deposited AlQ3 layer was used as an electron transport layer. The device fabrication was completed by the evaporation of LiF (1 nm) and aluminum cathode (150 nm).
• The luminance-voltage, efficiency-voltage characteristics of the three devices are shown in FIG. 7 and Table 4. The electroluminescence spectra of the diodes were identical to those of shown in FIG. 5. No excimer or exciplex emission was observed. Since PBD is a relatively low crystallization temperature, it is not an ideal candidate for use as hole blocking/electron transport layer, in this example it was replaced by a new hole blocking layer F-TBB (Ref. on F-TBB: K. Okumoto et al. Chem. Mater. 15, 699 (2003)). The device performance has been improved, especially for Os1 based devices. Maximum luminous efficiencies reached 7.0 cd/A, 3.5 cd/A, and 1.2 cd/A for devices based on 10 wt. % of Os(II) complexes Os1, Os2 and Os3, respectively, even with air stable aluminum as the cathode. Some photophysical and electrochemical properties of these three Os(II) complexes are listed in Table 5.
Example 18 Further Demonstration of Efficient Polymer Phosphorescent Light Emitting Diodes at Different Doping Concentrations
• The dependence of electroluminescenct performance on the doping levels of Os(II) complexes in the emitting layer was investigated in this embodiment using the same device structure as in Example 16, but at different doping concentrations. Similar to most reported electrophosphorescent OLEDs and PLEDs, the device performance showed a strong dependence on doping concentration. The results are summarized in Table 6. The best device performance was observed at 10 wt. % doping concentration for all three Os(II) complexes. The maximum luminance and luminous efficiency increased with increasing Os(II) complex concentration in the beginning and reached maxima at 10 wt. % doping concentration. However, a further increase in the doping level resulted in a reduction in both device brightness and efficiency probably due to concentration quenching and triplet-triplet annihilation.
• The application of the OS(II) complexes to light emitting diodes is not limited by the previously mentioned devices configuration. Since this is a new class of efficient phosphorescent materials, they can be used in variety of device structures. Some examples are given in FIGS. 8 and 9, where the cathode can be any high conductivity and low work function materials, electron transport layer (ETL) and electron injecting layer (EIJL) can be a single ETL; hole transport layer (HTL) and hole injecting layer (HIJL) can be a single HTL. The anode can be any high conductivity and high work function materials. Depending on the transport properties of the host material, Os compound doped emissive layer (EL) can also function as a EL/HTL layer or a EL/ETL layer. According to the device requirement, a device can be fabricated in a normal fashion (transparent or semitransparent anode on a transparent substrate) or a reversed structure (transparent or semitransparent cathode on a transparent substrate). The mentioned EIJL, ETL, HTL, HIJL as well as the EL host material can be small molecules, oganometallic compounds, oligomers or polymers.
• Preparation of these Os(II) complexes can involve the exploitation of recently explored blue-emitting Os complex [Os(fppz)₂(CO)₂] (Wu, P.—C et al. Organometallics, 2003, 22, 4938 or its relevant analogue [Os(fptz)₂(CO)]₂ as the starting material. Alternatively, for example, see examples 5˜14 and Examples 20˜22). A desired synthesis was first initiated by the treatment of Me₃NO to eliminate the coordinated CO ligands, followed by addition of phosphine ligands. This synthetic scheme has led to the isolation of red-emitting complexes [Os(fppz)₂L₂], L=PPh₂Me (Os1) and L=PPhMe₂ (Os2), or [Os(fptz)₂L₂], L=PPh₂Me (Os3) in moderate yields (40-72%). These Os metal complexes were fully characterized using spectroscopic methods, while complex Os1 was further examined by the single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis.
• As depicted in FIG. 10, the Os atom of complex Os1 is located at the crystallographic center of inversion. The molecular frame reveals an octahedral configuration where two chelating fppz ligands establish a nearly planar OsN₄ basal arrangement, together with two PPh₂Me ligands located at the axial dispositions. The planar ligand arrangement is analogous to those of the prophinato ligand in metalloprophyrins such as [Os(TTP)(PPh₃)₂], TTP=meso-tetraphenylprophinate, and [Os(TPP)(CO)(Im)], Im=1-methylimidazole. The measured Os—N_(pz) distances of 2.073(2) Å in Os1 are slightly shorter than the respect Os—N_(py) bonds of 2.090(2) Å; both lengths fall in the range expected for a typical N—Os(II) dative bond. Of particular interest is the relatively weak non-bonding contacts (N3A . . . C1=3.305 Å and N3A . . . H1˜2.50 Å) observed between the ortho-hydrogen atom of the pyridyl moiety and the N atom of the nearby pyrazolate fragment. In good agreement with this observation, the ¹H NMR spectrum revealed a significantly downfield signal at δ 10.40, giving an additional indication of the deshielding effect exerted by the N atom. It is speculated that this H-bonding, to a certain extent, is akin to that observed in the cobaloxime complexes.
• The absorption and luminescence spectra of complexes Os1-Os3 in CH₂Cl₂ are shown in FIG. 11. The strong absorption bands at the UV region are assigned to the spin-allowed ¹ππ* transition of the fppz (or fptz) ligands, owing to their spectral similarity to the free fppz (or fptz) anion. The next lower energy absorption can be ascribed to a typical spin-allowed metal to ligand charge transfer (¹MLCT) transition, while two absorption bands extending into the visible region are associated with the spin-orbit coupling enhanced ³ ππ* and ³MLCT transition. Further luminescence properties (vide infra) support ³MLCT to be in the lowest triplet state with peak wavelengths at 542 (ε=1300), 553 (ε=1600) and 560 nm (ε=950 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹) for complexes Os1, Os2 and Os3, respectively. It is notable that substitution with strong electron donors such as PPh₂Me and PPhMe₂ ligands not only increase the entire transition dipole moment, but also cause a significant red-shift due to the enhancement of dative interaction with Os(II), and hence raise the d-orbital energy level of the Os metal center. A similar mechanism has been proposed to delineate their electron donating effect for the Os(II) polypyridyl complexes.
• Highly intensive luminescence was observed for Os1-Os3 with λ_max located at 617, 631 and 648 nm, respectively. The entire emission band originating from a triplet state manifold was ascertained by the O₂ quenching rate constant of ˜2.1×10⁹ M⁻¹s⁻¹ for Os1-Os3 in CH₂Cl₂. The significant overlap of the 0-0 onsets between emission and the lowest energy absorption band, in combination with a broad, structureless spectral feature, leads us to conclude that the phosphorescence originates primarily from the ³MLCT state. In comparison to Os2 coordinated with PPhMe₂ ligand, complex Os1 bearing the PPh₂Me group reveals a ˜15 nm hypsochromic shift in λ_max and can qualitatively be rationalized by a decrease of Os(II) d-orbital energy level due to a stronger electron withdrawing strength of an additional phenyl substitution. Table 1 lists the corresponding photophysical data for the studied complexes in both solution and solid phases. The observed lifetimes of ca. 0.6-0.9 μs in degassed CH₂Cl₂ are considerably shorter than that of most reported red emitting Ir(III) complexes. In the solid state, the emission maximum for these osmium phosphors shifts to the red possibly due to molecular packing, and the lifetime falls within the range of 0.4-0.6 μs (Table 1). The emission quantum efficiency of Os1-Os3 lies within the range 0.19-0.50 in CH₂Cl₂ and 0.1-0.3 in the solid state. The results correlate well with unusually large extinction coefficients measured for the ³MLCT bands and thus are very desirable for OLED related applications.
• The electroluminescence (EL) spectra of OLEDs based on Os1˜Os3 are shown in FIG. 5 a. The energy transfer from host material PVK to the Os(II) emitters is very efficient, as supported by the lack of PVK emission in the EL spectra. The EL spectra remained unchanged over a wide rage of bias voltages. The OLEDs with Os1 reached maximum efficiency (η_max) of 4.0 cd/A at a driving voltage of 13 V with a luminance of 412 cd/m². The η_max of Os2 reached 3.0 cd/A at 21 V with a luminance of 615 cd/m², while those of Os3 were 1.0 cd/A at 20 V and 271 cd/m². Although η_max and maximum luminance of Os3 appeared to be lower (Table 1), quantum efficiencies and optical power output of these three compounds are similar, considering the fact that the normalized photopic vision functions V(λ) at 630, 640, and 660 nm are 0.265, 0.175 and 0.061 respectively. We believe that the turn-on voltages can be significantly reduced by using either a host material with better charge carrier transport properties or a lower work-function cathode, such as Ca or Mg:Ag alloy.
• Thus, in one aspect the invention provides the synthesis of highly efficient red-emitting Os(II) complexes. In contrast to most Os(II) emitters with ionic character, in which the hole and electron injection may be strongly coupled with respect to the counter ions, this new series of complexes are discrete neutral molecules, and thus the anionic fppz (or fptz) ligands are securely attached to the Os(II) center. This unique property may contribute to a more efficient energy transfer and carrier trapping, rendering advantages to the overall device efficiency for Os1˜Os3 described above.
Example 19 General Methods
• Reactions were performed under nitrogen. Solvents were distilled from appropriate drying agent prior to use. Commercially available reagents were used without further purification unless otherwise stated. Reactions were monitored by TLC with Merck pre-coated glass plates (0.20 mm with fluorescent indicator UV₂₅₄). Compounds were visualized with UV light irradiation at 254 nm and 365 nm. Flash column chromatography was carried out using silica gel from Merck (230-400 mesh). Mass spectra were obtained on a JEOL SX-102A instrument operating in electron impact (EI) mode or fast atom bombardment (FAB) mode. ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra were recorded on Varian Mercury-400 or INOVA-500 instruments; chemical shifts are quoted with respect to the internal standard tetramethylsilane for ¹H and ¹³C NMR data.
• Spectroscopic and Dynamic Measurements: Steady-state absorption and emission spectra were recorded by a Hitachi (U-3310) spectrophotometer and an Edinburgh (FS920) fluorimeter, respectively. Both wavelength-dependent excitation and emission response of the fluorimeter have been calibrated. A configuration of front-face excitation was used to measure the emission of the solid sample, in which the cell was made by assembling two edge-polished quartz plates with various Teflon spacers. A combination of appropriate filters was used to avoid the interference from the scattering light.
• Lifetime studies were performed by an Edinburgh FL 900 photon-counting system with a hydrogen-filled/or a nitrogen lamp as the excitation source. Data were analyzed using the nonlinear least squares procedure in combination with an iterative convolution method. The emission decays were analyzed by the sum of exponential functions, which allows partial removal of the instrument time broadening and consequently renders a temporal resolution of ˜200 ps.
• Quinine sulfate/1.0 N H₂SO₄ was used as a reference, assuming a yield of 0.564 with 360 nm excitation, to determined fluorescence quantum yields of the studied compounds in solution. Solution samples were degassed by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles under the vigorous stirring condition. An integrated sphere was applied to measure the quantum yield in the solid state, in which the solid sample film was prepared via the spin-coating method and was excited by a 457 nm Ar⁺ laser line. The resulting luminescence was acquired by an intensified charge-coupled detector.
Example 20 Alternative Preparation of [Os(fppz)₂(PPh₂Me)₂] (Os1) (as Depicted in this Example)
• A freshly sublimed Me₃NO (90 mg, 1.19 mmol) was first dissolved into an acetonitrile (5 mL) and the resulting solution was added dropwise to a stirred suspension of [Os(fppz)₂(CO)₂] (200 mg, 0.25 mmol) in toluene (30 mL), giving a clear, yellow orange solution after stirring for 2 minutes at room temperature. After then, the phosphine ligand PPh₂Me (567 μL, 3.0 mmol) was added and the mixture was brought to reflux for 3 hr, during which time the color was found to change to bright red. The reaction was then stopped, toluene solvent and excess of phosphine ligand were removed under vacuum, the solid residue dissolved in 50 mL of ethyl acetate and washed with distilled water (30 mL×2) to remove the remaining Me₃NO. The organic phase was dried over Na₂SO₄ and the solvent was removed in vacuo to yield red-orange crude product. Further purification was conducted by silica gel column chromatography using a 1:1 mixture of ethyl acetate and hexane, followed by recrystallization from CH₂Cl₂ and hexane, giving red-orange crystalline solid (180 mg, 0.18 mmol); yield: 72%.
Example 21 Alternative Preparation of [Os(fppz)₂(PPhMe₂)₂] (Os2)
• The procedure was identical to that depicted in Example 20, using 200 mg of the osmium complex [Os(fppz)₂(CO)₂] (0.25 mmol), 90 mg of freshly sublimed Me₃NO (1.19 mmol) and 425 μL of phosphine ligand PPhMe₂ (2.98 mmol) as starting materials. After the reaction was stopped, the content was washed with water, followed by silica gel column chromatography, and recrystallization from hexane solution to afford the dark red crystalline solid (145 mg, 0.18 mmol) in 55% yield.
Example 22 Alternative Preparation of [Os(fptz)₂(PPh₂Me)₂] (Os3)
• The procedure was identical to that depicted in Example 20, a freshly sublimed Me₃NO (70 mg, 0.92 mmol) was first dissolved into an acetonitrile (5 mL) and the resulting solution was added dropwise to a stirred suspension of [Os(fptz)₂(CO)₂] (200 mg, 0.31 mmol) in toluene (30 mL), giving a clear, yellow orange solution after stirring for 2 minutes at 0° C. After then, the phosphine ligand PPh₂Me (575 μL, 3.10 mmol) was added and the mixture was brought to reflux for 3 hr, during which time the color was found to change to dark red. The reaction was then stopped, toluene solvent and excess of phosphine ligand were removed under vacuum, the solid residue dissolved in 50 mL of ethyl acetate and washed with distilled water (30 mL×2) to remove the remaining Me₃NO. The organic phase was dried over Na₂SO₄ and the solvent was removed in vacuo to yield dark red crude product. Further purification was conducted by silica gel column chromatography using a 2:1 mixture of ethyl acetate and hexane, followed by recrystallization from acetone and hexane, giving deep red crystalline solid (123 mg, 0.12 mmol); yield: 40%.
Example 23 X-ray Structural Analysis
• Single crystal X-ray diffraction data of Os1 from Example 20 were measured on a Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer using Mo—K_α radiation (λ=0.71073 Å). The data collection was executed using the SMART program. Cell refinement and data reduction were made with the SAINT program. The structure was determined using the SHELXTL/PC program and refined using full-matrix least squares. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically, whereas hydrogen atoms were placed at the calculated positions and included in the final stage of refinements with fixed parameters.
• Selected crystal data of Os1: C₄₄H₃₆F₆N₆OsP₂, M=1014.93, triclinic, space group P-1, a=10.4469(5), b=10.5233(6), c=10.6829(6) A, α=71.968(1), β=62.053(1), γ=82.167(1)°, V=986.46(9) ų, Z=1, ρ_calcd=1.708 gcm⁻¹μF(000)=502, crystal size=0.35×0.30×0.25 mm, λ(Mo—K_α)=0.7107 Å, T=295 K, μ=3.383 mm⁻¹, 4516 reflections collected (R_int=0.0253), final R₁[I>2σ(I)]=0.0182 and wR₂(all data)=0.0438.
Example 24 Synthesis of [Ru(fppz)₂(CO)₂]
• 3-Trifluoromethyl-5-(2-pyridyl)pyrazole (pypz)H (620 mg, 2.91 mmol), Ru₃(CO)₁₂ (300 mg, 0.47 mmol) and hexane solvent (50 mL) were added to a 160 mL of stainless steel autoclave. The autoclave was sealed and slowly brought up to 185° C. for 36 hours. After that, the autoclave was cooled, the solvent was evaporated to dryness, and the solid residue was purified by column chromatography on SiO₂, eluting with a 1:1 mixture of ethyl acetate and hexane. Removal of excess solvent produced a light yellow solid, which was purified by sublimation (150 mtorr/165° C.), followed by crystallization from a mixture of CH₂Cl₂/hexane, giving the ruthenium complex [Ru(fppz)₂(CO)₂] as colorless rectangular crystals (191 mg, 0.33 mmol, 70%).
• Spectral data: MS (EI, 70 eV), observed m/z (actual) [assignment] {relative intensity}: 582 (582) [M⁺] {2.88}, 526 (526) [M⁺-2CO] {12.5}. IR (CH₂Cl₂): v(CO), 2076 (s), 2017 (s) cm⁻¹. ¹H NMR (500 MHz, d₆-acetone, 294K): δ 8.07˜8.03 (m, 4H, H_py) 7.38 (d, J_HH=1 Hz, 2H, H_pz), 7.32 (ddd, J_HH=6 Hz, 6 Hz and 3 Hz, 2H, H_py), 7.09 (dd, J_HH=6 Hz and 1 Hz, 2H, H_py). ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, d₆-acetone, 294K): δ 194.7 (CO), 154.4 (C_py), 150.7 (C_pz), 148.9 (CH_py), 146.7 (q, ²J_CF=36.6 Hz, C_pz), 141.7 (CN_py), 124.5 (CH_pz), 123.1 (q, ¹J_CF=266.3 Hz, CF₃), 121.7 (CH_py), 104.3 (CH_py). ¹⁹F NMR (470 MHz, d₆-acetone, 294K): δ−60.2 (s). Anal. Calcd. for C₂₀H₁₀F₆N₆O₂Ru: C, 41.372; N, 14.68; H, 1.85. Found: C, 41.32; N, 14.46; H, 1.73.
• Thus, it will be appreciated that there has been provided herein compounds having phosphorescent properties, and uses thereof.
REFERENCES
• Inclusion of a reference is neither an admission nor a suggestion that it is relevant to the patentability of anything disclosed herein.
• Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Berner, D.; Rivier, S.; Zuppiroli, L.; Graetzel, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8790.
• Tamayo, A. B.; Alleyne, B. D.; Djurovich, P. I.; Lamansky, S.; Tsyba, I.; Ho, N. N.; Bau, R.; Thompson, M. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7377.
• Ostrowski, J. C.; Robinson, M. R.; Heeger, A. J.; Bazan, G. C. Chem. Commun. 2002, 784.
• Lamansky, S.; Djurovich, P.; Murphy, D.; Abdel-Razzaq, F.; Lee, H.-E.; Adachi, C.; Burrows, P. E.; Forrest, S. R.; Thompson, M. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4304.
• Baldo, M. A.; Thompson, M. E.; Forrest, S. R. Pure Appl. Chem. 1999, 71, 2095.
• Kober, E. M.; Caspar, J. V.; Lumpkin, R. S.; Meyer, T. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 3722.
• Della Ciana, L.; Dressick, W. J.; Sandrini, D.; Maestri, M.; Ciano, M. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 2792.
• Tsuboyama, A.; Iwawaki, H.; Furugori, M.; Mukaide, T.; Kamatani, J.; Igawa, S.; Moriyama, T.; Miura, S.; Takiguchi, T.; Okada, S.; Hoshino, M.; Ueno, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12971.
• Lin, Y.-Y.; Chan, S.-C.; Chan, M. C. W.; Hou, Y.-J.; Zhu, N.; Che, C.-M.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y. Chem.-Eur. J. 2003, 9, 1263.
• D'Andrade, B. W.; Brooks, J.; Adamovich, V.; Thompson, M. E.; Forrest, S. R. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 1032.
• Brooks, J.; Babayan, Y.; Lamansky, S.; Djurovich, P. I.; Tsyba, I.; Bau, R.; Thompson, M. E. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 3055.
• Carlson, B.; Phelan, G. D.; Kaminsky, W.; Dalton, L.; Jiang, X. Z.; S., L.; Jen, A. K.-Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14162.
• Bernhard, S.; Gao, X.; Malliaras, G. G.; Abruna, H. D. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 433.
• Kim, J. H.; Liu, M. S.; Jen, A. K.-Y.; Carlson, B.; Dalton, L. R.; Shu, C.-F.; Dodda, R. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 83, 776.
• Gao, F. G.; Bard, A. J. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 3465.
• Wu, P.-C.; Yu, J.-K.; Song, Y.-H.; Chi, Y.; Chou, P.-T.; Peng, S.-M.; Lee, G.-H., 22, 4938.
• Che, C. M.; Lai, T. F.; Chung, W. C.; Schaefer, W. P.; Gray, H. B. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 3907.
• Salzmann, R.; Ziegler, C. J.; Godbout, N.; McMahon, M. T.; Suslick, K. S.; Oldfield, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11323.
• Gupta, B. D.; Singh, V.; Yamuna, R.; Barclay, T.; Cordes, W. Organometallics 2003, 22, 2670.
• Kober, E. M.; Sullivan, B. P.; Dressick, W. J.; Caspar, J. V.; Meyer, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 7383.
• Su, Y.-J.; Huang, H.-L.; Li, C.-L.; Chien, C.-H.; Tao, Y.-T.; Chou, P.-T.; Datta, S.; Liu, R.-S. Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 884.
• Jiang, X.; Jen, A. K. Y.; Carlson, B.; Dalton, L. R. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 3125.
• G. Albano, V. Balzani, E. C. Constable, M. Maestri, and D. R. Smith, Inorg. Chim. Acta 277, 225 (1998).
• S. Bernhard, X. C. Gao, G. G. Malliaras, and H. D. Abruna, Adv. Mater. 14, 433 (2002).
• B. Carlson, G. D. Phelan, W. Kaminsky, L. Dalton, X. Z. Jiang, S. Liu, and A. K. Y. Jen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 14162 (2002).
• F. G. Gao and A. J. Bard, Chem. Mater 14, 3465 (2002).
• D. Guez, D. Markovitsi, M. Sommerauer, and M. Hanack, Chem. Phys. Lett. 249, 309 (1996).
• X. Z. Jiang, A. K. Y. Jen, B. Carlson, and L. R. Dalton, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 713 (2002).
• X. Z. Jiang, G. Philan, B. Carlson, S. Liu, L. Dalton, and A. K. Y. Jen, Macromolecular Symposia 186, 171 (2002).
• J. H. Kim, M. S. Liu, A. K. Y. Jen, B. Carlson, L. R. Dalton, C. F. Shu, and R. Dodda, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 776 (2003).
• Y. G. Ma, H. Y. Zhang, J. C. Shen, and C. M. Che, Synthetic Metals 94, 245 (1998).
• Demas, J. N.; Crosby, G. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1971, 75, 991.
• Birks, J. B. Photophysics of Aromatic Molecules, Wiley, New York, 1970, p 313.

  TABLE 1A
  Photochemical properties of Os(II) carbonyl complexes.a

  			Φ	τ
  	λmax (nm)b	λem max (nm)	(%)c	(μs)

  	Os(fppz)2(CO)2	254, 311	430, 457, 480	14.0	18.3
  	Os(fmpz)2(CO)2	254, 306	428, 455, 480	4.1	6.3
  	Os(fptz)2(CO)2	243, 307	420, 446, 468	23.3	2.88
  	Os(bptz)2(CO)2	250, 333	455, 480, 507	47.1	39.9
  	aAll sample solutions were degassed and the spectra recorded in CH3CN at room temperature.
  	bThe dominant absorption band at spectral regions of 225˜280 nm, is ascribed to the local 1ππ* transition of pyridine and/or triazolate (or pyrazole). The broad, structureless band maximized at 306˜333 nm is attributed to a pyrazole or
  	# triazolate-to-pyridine intra-ligand ππ* transition, no visible absorption could be resolved in the region of 380˜700 nm, suggesting that all MLCT transitions are hidden in the UV region of the strong intra-ligand ππ* transitions.
  	cQuinine sulfate with an emission yield of Φ˜0.57 in 0.1M H2SO4 served as the standard to calculate the emission quantum yield. Sample solutions were degassed by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles.

• TABLE 1B
  The structures of Os(II) carbonyl complexes depicted in Table 1A.

• TABLE 2A
  Photochemical properties of Os(II) phosphine complexes.a

  		λem max	Φ
  	λmax (nm) (ε, M−1cm−1)b	(nm)	(%)c	τ (ns)

  Os(fppz)2(PPh2Me)2	402 (14900), 453 (2600),	620	43.4	831
  	535 (1600)
  Os(fppz)2(PPhMe2)2	408 (14600), 460 (2100),	637	25.6	661
  	547 (1400)
  Os(bppz)2(PPh3)2	408 (10600), 466 (3000),	647	0.3
  	572 (1300)
  Os(bppz)2(PPh2Me)2	408 (13600), 467 (3100),	666	2.5	214
  	576 (1500)
  Os(pppz)2(PPh3)2	406 (17500), 450 (3500),	650	0.1
  	542 (1900)
  Os(pppz)2(PPh2Me)2	412 (10500), 471 (2400),	654	0.9
  	575 (1000)
  Os(fptz)2(PPh2Me)2	403 (15600), 450 (2400),	618	55.4	1021
  	537 (1400)
  Os(fptz)2(PPhMe2)2	408 (16000), 461 (2000),	635	12.3	782
  	547 (1400)
  Os(bptz)2(PPh2Me)2	405 (16800), 467 (2900).	650	13.3	608
  	559 (1500)
  Os(mptz)2(PPh2Me)2	408 (10700), 465 (2500),	664	2.3	218
  	580 (1200)
  Os(hptz)2(PPh2Me)2	401 (15000), 451 (2300),	616	63.7	1094
  	532 (1400)
  Os(hptz)2(PPhMe2)2	407 (20000), 460 (2500),	633	29.2	834
  	546 (1700)
  aAll sample solutions were degassed and the spectra recorded in CH3CN at room temperature.
  bThese absorption bands were due to the 1ππ*, 1MLCT and the combination of 3ππ* and 3MLCT transitions, respectively.
  c4-(Dicyanomethylene)-2-methyl-6-(p-dimethylaminostyryl)-4H-pyran (DCM, assuming a yield of 0.44 in methanol) was used as a reference to determined fluorescence quantum yields. Sample solutions were degassed by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles.

• TABLE 2B
  The structures of Os(II) phosphine complexes depicted in Table 2A.

• TABLE 3
  Some electroluminescent characteristics of the embodiment of FIG. 4.

  	V @ 1 cd/m2		Max.Efficiency
  	(V)	Lmax (cd/m2)	(cd/A)	λmax (nm)

  Os1	5.5	3300	˜3.5	626
  Os2	8.5	2100	˜3.0	640
  Os3	8.5	775	˜1.0	658

• TABLE 4
  Some electroluminescent characteristics of the embodiment of FIG. 6.

  	V @ 1 cd/m2		Max.Efficiency
  	(V)	Lmax (cd/m2)	(cd/A)	λmax (nm)

  Os1	8.5	4500	˜7.0	626
  Os2	9.0	2448	˜3.5	640
  Os3	9.5	1000	˜1.3	658

• TABLE 5
  Photophysical and electrochemical properties of Os1˜Os3.

  Com-	λabs a nm	λem a			ET b	E1/2 ox	EHOMO	ELUMO
  plex	(log ε)	nm	Φa	τa ns	eV	mVc	eVd	eVe

  Os1	405 (4.2)	620	0.5	855	2.00	231	4.72	2.15
  	454 (3.4)
  	542 (3.1)
  Os2	411 (4.2)	631	0.19	725	1.97	157	4.65	2.13
  	456 (3.4)
  	553 (3.2)
  Os3	406 (4.1)	648	0.25	634	1.92	176	4.67	2.18
  	466 (3.3)
  	560 (3.0)
  aMeasured in degassed CH2Cl2 solutions at room temperature.
  bThe triplet energy was estimated from the phosphorescence peak.
  cE1/2 ox stands for the half-wave oxidation (p-doping) potential vs an Ag quasi-reference.
  dEstimated from E1/2 ox by using an empirical equation EHOMO = E1/2 ox + 4.49 eV.
  eEstimated from EHOMO and optical energy gap (S0 → 1MLCT).

• TABLE 6
  OLED device performance of Os(II) complexes doped into the PVK host.

  Doping	Turn-on	EL	ηLE at	ηLE at	Maxium
  level	voltage	peak	1.0 mA/cm2	100 mA/cm2	luminance
  (wt %)	(V)a	(nm)	(cd/A)	(cd/A)	(cd/m2)

  Os1

  1	9	616	2.1	1.8	2400 (20 V)
  5	10	620	2.1	1.9	2800 (20 V)
  10	9	626	6.5	3.8	4235 (28 V)
  15	9	626	1.0	1.2	2150 (24.5 V)

  Os2

  1	8	628	1.0	0.7	891 (18 V)
  5	12	636	1.1	1.0	1581 (23.5 V)
  10	9	640	2.8	2.1	2475 (32 V)
  15	9	640	0.9	0.8	1350 (24 V)

  Os3

  1	9	392b	0.6	0.3	373 (19 V)
  5	14	660	0.4	0.4	845 (25 V)
  10	9	660	1.2	0.7	1000 (31 V)
  15	10	662	0.3	0.4	805 (26 V)
  aVoltage required to achieve a luminance of 1 cd/m2.
  bThe EL emission from PVK became dominant in the device with 1.0 wt % Os(II) complex Os3

Claims (36)

1. A compound of structure III:

wherein:

the anionic chelating chromophores N{circumflex over ( )}N, are formed by connecting a pentagonal ring structure containing at least two nitrogen atoms to a hexagonal pyridine type of fragment via a direct carbon-carbon linkage;

A is Os or Ru;

L stands for a neutral donor ligand;

L can occupy either cis or trans orientation;

X₁, X₂ and X₃ are independently C or N;

when X₂ is N, R₁ is omitted;

when X₃ is N, R₂ is omitted;

R₁ is H, C1-C8 alkyl, C1-C8 substituted phenyl or C1-C4 perfluoroalkyl;

R₂ is H, F and/or a cyano substituent;

X₄ of the hexagonal fragment is either C or N;

X₄ may locate at any position of the hexagonal ring, when X₄ is N and R₃ and R₄ are not linked to X₄; and

R₃ is H, methyl or C₁-C₃ small alkyl;

R₄ is H, methyl or C₁-C₃ small alkyl, or;

R₃ and R₄ together form the additional conjugated unit with structure

2. The compound of claim 1 wherein A is Os.

3. The compound of claim 1 wherein A is Ru.

4. The compound of claim 1 wherein X₁ is C.

5. The compound of claim 1 wherein X₁ is N.

6. The compound of claim 1 wherein X₂ is C.

7. The compound of claim 1 wherein X₂ is N.

8. The compound of claim 1 wherein X₃ is C.

9. The compound of claim 1 wherein X₃ is N.

10. The compound of claim 1 wherein R₂ is a fluoro and cyano substituent.

11. The compound of claim 1 wherein “L” is carbonyl and the remaining substituents are selected to provide structure 1a, 1b, or 1c:

12. A method of making a compound of structure I, comprising a condensation reaction of a bidentate chelating ligand of general formula

with osmium metal reagent Os₃(CO)₁₂ in the substantial absence of solvent media or in the presence of a high boiling polar organic solvent at elevated temperature.

13. The compound of claim 2 wherein substituents are selected to provide structure 3a, 3b, or 3c;

wherein examples of R¹, R² and H are as previously defined in formula (1a), (1b) and (1c) in claim 11.

14. The compound of claim 2 wherein substituents are selected to provide structures 4a, 4b or 4c:

wherein R¹, R² and H are as previously defined in formula (1a), (1b) and (1c) in claim 11, the phosphine donor ligand is selected from PPh₃, PPh₂Me, PPhMe₂, PMe₃, PPh₂(C₂F₅), PPh(C₂F₅)₂, PPh₂Et, PPhEt₂, PEt₃, PPh₂(CH═CH₂) and PPh(CH═CH₂)₂, the phosphite ligand is selected from P(OPh)₃, P(OMe)₃ and P(OEt)₃, the arsine ligand is selected from AsPh₃ and AsMe₃.

15. A method of making a compound of claim 14 comprising a condensation reaction of a bidentate chelating ligand of general formula

with osmium carbonyl reagent Os₃(CO)₁₂ in the presence of a high boiling polar organic solvent at elevated temperature, followed by treatment of resulting reaction mixture with a freshly sublimed decarbonylation reagent Me₃NO or Et₃NO, and the phosphine donor ligand.

16. The compound of claim 2 wherein substituents are selected to provide structures 5a, 5b or 5c:

wherein examples of R¹, R² and H are as previously defined in formula (1a), (1b) and (1c) in claim 1, chelating diphosphine ligand R³ ₂P{circumflex over ( )}PR³ ₂ are selected from 1,2-bis(dimethylphosphino)ethane, 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane, 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)benzene, 1,2-bis(diethoxylphosphino)benzene, cis-1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethylene, bis(dipentafluoroethylphosphino)ethane 1,2-bis(dipentafluorophenylphosphino)ethane, 1,3-bis(dimethylphosphino)propane, 1,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)propane, 1,4-bis(dimethylphosphino)butane and 1,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)butane, for which the carbon spacer linking the phosphorous donor group is considerably lengthened to increase the chelating bite angle at the Os(II) metal center.

17. The compound of claim 1 in which the 2-pyridyl unit of the pyrazolate, triazolate and tetrazolate ligands is further modified to add an aromatic heterocycle molecule and to replace the pyrazolate fragment of the anionic ligand by an imidiazolate or an indazolate unit.

18. The compound of claim 17 wherein the aromatic hetercycle molecule is selected from:

19. The compound of claim 17 wherein the aromatic heterocycle molecule is selected from pyrazine, pyrimidine, pyridazine, quinoline and isoquinoline.

20. A light-emitting device, comprising;

a pair of electrodes,

a substrate,

one or more organic layers deposited on said substrate,

at least one organic layer including a functional phosphorescent component,

said functional phosphorescent component include a compound of structure III.

21. The light-emitting device of claim 20 wherein the compound of structure III is placed in a substantially non-ionic environment.

22. The light-emitting device of claim 20 wherein the phosphorescent component includes a compound of structure I.

23. The light-emitting device of claim 20 wherein the phosphorescent component includes a compound of structure II.

24. The light-emitting device of claim 20 where said device is either an organic light emitting diode, or a polymer light-emitting diode, or a functional layer made of small moles or a functional layer made of polymers, or a composite material made of small moles and polymer molecules.

25. The light-emitting device of claim 24 where said small moles include oligomers.

26. The light-emitting device of claim 20 where said organic layer include a second phosphorescent material.

27. A light-emitting device comprising an anode and a cathode, a hole transport layer, an electron transport layer, and wherein at least one of said hole transport layer and said electron transport layer comprises an active material of structure III.

28. The light-emitting device of claim 26 wherein the compound of structure III is located in a substantially non-ionic environment.

29. The light-emitting device of claim 26 further including a hole injection promotion layer adjacent to at least one of said hole transport layer.

30. The light-emitting device of claim 26 further including an electron injection promotion layer adjacent to at least one of said electron transport layer.

31. The light-emitting device of claim 29, wherein said electron injection promotion layer is LiF.

32. The light-emitting device of claim 28, wherein said hole injection promotion layer is [Poly(ethylene dioxythiophene:polystryrene sulfonate)] (PEDOT-PSS).

33. The light-emitting device of claim 20 wherein the organic layers are deposited by using a dry deposition method or a wet thin film processing method.

34. The light-emitting device of claim 27 wherein the layers are deposited by using a dry deposition method or a wet thin film processing method.

35. The light-emitting device of claim 20 where the dry deposition method is selected of the group of thermal deposition and sputtering deposition and PECVD deposition and MOCVD deposition.

36. The light-emitting device of claim 20 where the wet thin film processing method is selected of the group of Langmuir-Blodgett, screen printing, and ink-jet printing, and solution dipping and, spin-coating.

Images