+

US20050116117A1 - Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination - Google Patents

Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050116117A1
US20050116117A1 US10/935,688 US93568804A US2005116117A1 US 20050116117 A1 US20050116117 A1 US 20050116117A1 US 93568804 A US93568804 A US 93568804A US 2005116117 A1 US2005116117 A1 US 2005116117A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
truck hunting
peak
peaks
samples
truck
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/935,688
Inventor
Timothy Slifkin
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US10/935,688 priority Critical patent/US20050116117A1/en
Publication of US20050116117A1 publication Critical patent/US20050116117A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61KAUXILIARY EQUIPMENT SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR RAILWAYS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B61K9/00Railway vehicle profile gauges; Detecting or indicating overheating of components; Apparatus on locomotives or cars to indicate bad track sections; General design of track recording vehicles

Definitions

  • This invention relates to methods and apparatus for determination of truck hunting.
  • One embodiment of the invention involves taking samples of side to side acceleration in a vehicle, evaluating the samples by comparing the samples, and determining the degree of truck hunting on the basis of the comparison.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic elevation of an embodiment of the invention in the form of a railroad car including equipment for truck hunting determination.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic elevation of an embodiment of the invention showing a vehicle roof line with a solar panel.
  • FIGS. 3 and 4 are graphs illustrating performance under various conditions.
  • Truck hunting is defined as a lateral movement from side to side of a railcar.
  • the AAR has set parameters for defining problematic truck hunting as 10 or more events of greater than 0.75 g at a rate of 2-6 Hz. Lower levels of events are indicative of degradation of railcar components, and could further degrade.
  • the aforementioned shaking leaves a measurable lateral signature on the y-axis accelerometer. This signature will be captured and monitored for evaluation under two different scenarios. The first deals with routine car health evaluation and monitoring, the second with truck hunting “events” in which the hunting exceeds certain levels.
  • the unit During the course of operation, the unit will be taking samples and evaluating them (see below). The comparison of energy and peaks over time is one way to determine the level of truck hunting.
  • the second method involves evaluating specific events that exceed certain set parameters, In this case, should the peak g exceed this number, then further analysis is done to determine whether it is a hunting event, or the car has gone over a piece of bad track.
  • the unit will take the 3 second buffer and an additional continuous 7 seconds (for a total of ten) and analyze the number of peaks over a set g to determine if there has been a hunting event, or something else.
  • Each sample will have a number of peaks during the sample period. These peak numbers will be captured and stored in a database for eventual use in the truck hunting histogram.
  • the data itself will be stored in the following format:
  • bins will be stored on-car until the car is queried (once or twice a month) and then compiled into two histograms: one for unloaded, one for when the car is loaded.
  • the histogram will have the number of peaks between these g levels within specific ranges of speed (see chart below). 0.2-0.299 g 0.3-0.399 g 0.4-0.499 g 0.5-0.599 g 0.6-0.699 g 0.7+ g 10-19.9 mph 20-29.9 mph 30-39.9 mph 40-49.9 mph 50-59.9 mph 60+ mph
  • At least two 36 bin histograms will be forwarded; one for when the car is unloaded, one for when the car is loaded.
  • the addition of the two histograms together can all be done on the data server.
  • the forwarded histograms will then be compared to the historical histograms we have on file. And significant changes can be noted and forwarded to the customer.
  • the specific changes that might signal a trend towards truck hunting include any move towards the right columns (i.e. higher peak g's).
  • the unit will automatically wake and capture data if y-axis peak g's exceed a certain level (i.e. 0.5 g). At this point the unit will save the buffer and capture for an additional period of time.
  • a certain level i.e. 0.5 g
  • Results are saved in database
  • Results are saved in histogram Waveform analyzed to determine whether the Waveform analyzed to determine whether t frequency of significant peaks (i.e. those over frequency of significant peaks (i.e. those ov some set number [typically 0.5 g]) is greater than some set number [typically 0.5 g]) is greater some other set number (typically 2-6 Hz) some other set number (typically 2-6 Hz) Histogram analyzed for trends to determine potential degradation of performance If trend alarm triggered, then alarm and histogram sent to base station If not, histogram forwarded at set period (e.g.
  • any peak exceeds some set number typically If any peak exceeds some set number (typic 0.5 g), and frequency is not greater than trigger, 0.5 g), and frequency is not greater than trig then alarm is sent to base station regarding then alarm is sent to base station regarding possible bad track section possible bad track section Periodic geographic analysis done in central Periodic geographic analysis done in central server to determine any possible track server to determine any possible track anomalies. anomalies.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)

Abstract

Truck hunting determination involves taking samples of side to side acceleration in a vehicle, evaluating the samples by comparing the samples, and determining the degree of truck hunting on the basis of the comparison.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/119,461 filed Jul. 19, 1998, which claims priority of Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/053,143 filed Jul. 18, 1997. Applicant claims the priority benefit under 35 USC 120 of each of these applications.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention relates to methods and apparatus for determination of truck hunting.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The various means for determination of truck hunting, that is lateral movement, in railroad cars and other cargo carriers have depended on cumbersome and inaccurate arrangements which are difficult to transmit to remote locations.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • One embodiment of the invention involves taking samples of side to side acceleration in a vehicle, evaluating the samples by comparing the samples, and determining the degree of truck hunting on the basis of the comparison.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic elevation of an embodiment of the invention in the form of a railroad car including equipment for truck hunting determination.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic elevation of an embodiment of the invention showing a vehicle roof line with a solar panel.
  • FIGS. 3 and 4 are graphs illustrating performance under various conditions.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • 1. Truck Hunting Determination
  • 1.1. Definition
  • Truck hunting is defined as a lateral movement from side to side of a railcar. The AAR has set parameters for defining problematic truck hunting as 10 or more events of greater than 0.75 g at a rate of 2-6 Hz. Lower levels of events are indicative of degradation of railcar components, and could further degrade.
  • 1.2. Determination
  • The aforementioned shaking leaves a measurable lateral signature on the y-axis accelerometer. This signature will be captured and monitored for evaluation under two different scenarios. The first deals with routine car health evaluation and monitoring, the second with truck hunting “events” in which the hunting exceeds certain levels.
  • 1.2.1. Identification of Truck Hunting Events
  • Two methods are available to capture this problem. They are:
  • 1.2.1.1. Routine Monitoring
  • During the course of operation, the unit will be taking samples and evaluating them (see below). The comparison of energy and peaks over time is one way to determine the level of truck hunting.
  • 1.2.1.2. Event Monitoring
  • The second method involves evaluating specific events that exceed certain set parameters, In this case, should the peak g exceed this number, then further analysis is done to determine whether it is a hunting event, or the car has gone over a piece of bad track.
  • The unit will take the 3 second buffer and an additional continuous 7 seconds (for a total of ten) and analyze the number of peaks over a set g to determine if there has been a hunting event, or something else.
  • 1.2.2. Truck Hunting Health Evaluation and Monitoring
  • 10 second y-axis samples will be taken periodically (2-4 times per hour) throughout the day, and only when the car is moving.
  • 1.2.2.1. Sample Analysis
  • Each sample will have a number of peaks during the sample period. These peak numbers will be captured and stored in a database for eventual use in the truck hunting histogram. The data itself will be stored in the following format:
    • Date/time, speed, mass, peaks, peak2, peak3, peak4, peak5, peak6
  • Where:
      • Peak1=The number of peaks between 0.2-0.299 g
      • Peak2=The number of peaks between 0.3-0.399 g
      • Peak3=The number of peaks between 0.4-0.499 g
      • Peak4=The number of peaks between 0.5-0.599 g
      • Peak5=The number of peaks between 0.6-0.699 g
      • Peak6=The number of peaks at or above 0.7 g
  • These bins will be stored on-car until the car is queried (once or twice a month) and then compiled into two histograms: one for unloaded, one for when the car is loaded.
  • 1.2.2.2. Truck Hunting Histogram
  • The histogram will have the number of peaks between these g levels within specific ranges of speed (see chart below).
    0.2-0.299 g 0.3-0.399 g 0.4-0.499 g 0.5-0.599 g 0.6-0.699 g 0.7+ g
    10-19.9 mph
    20-29.9 mph
    30-39.9 mph
    40-49.9 mph
    50-59.9 mph
       60+ mph
  • Truck Hunting Histogram
  • As the mass of the car may affect the hunting signature, at least two 36 bin histograms will be forwarded; one for when the car is unloaded, one for when the car is loaded. The addition of the two histograms together can all be done on the data server.
  • 1.2.2.3. Trend Analysis
  • The forwarded histograms will then be compared to the historical histograms we have on file. And significant changes can be noted and forwarded to the customer. The specific changes that might signal a trend towards truck hunting include any move towards the right columns (i.e. higher peak g's).
  • 1.2.3. On-Car Parameters
  • One of the benefits to the RM7000 system is the two way communication and the fact that much of the analysis and parameters are dynamic. We can, therefore, remotely set the key parameters as we learn more about the functioning of the cars. The key remote-settable parameters are:
      • Sample frequency—The number of times per day (e.g. 2 times/hour) that a sample is taken
      • Sample duration—The length of time (e.g. 10 seconds) that a sample lasts
      • Alarm trigger—The peak g that must be exceeded (e.g. 0.5 g) for capture to start and for analysis to be done on the captured sample.
      • Bin parameters—Histogram parameters (speed and g ranges)
        1.2.4. Commands
      • Reset—Will reset/re-calibrate the data on-car. This is needed if a repair has recently been done, etc.
        1.2.5. Messages
        1.2.6. Alarm—Wake
  • The unit will automatically wake and capture data if y-axis peak g's exceed a certain level (i.e. 0.5 g). At this point the unit will save the buffer and capture for an additional period of time.
  • This analysis will evaluate whether there have been a number of peaks over certain levels within the sample period of time. These parameters will be set in a manner similar to the AAR definitions. For example:
  • If the number of peaks over 0.5 g is greater than some set number (5-10) then an alarm message is sent to the customer, alerting them to the potential problem.
  • 1.2.7. Alarm—Badswitch
  • If the peak exceeds some other number (e.g. 1 g) and seems to be a single event, then another alarm is sent, indicating that there was a bad switch, or perhaps a bad section of track or other anomaly.
    Summary of Truck Hunting Health Determination Event Flow
    During Standard Monitoring After Awakening from Trigger
    Sample waveform (typically 10 seconds) is Sample waveform is taken (3 seconds from
    taken buffer, 7 additional seconds, for total of 10)
    Peak Analysis is performed (i.e. # peaks within Peak Analysis is performed (i.e. # peaks wi
    Figure US20050116117A1-20050602-P00899
    each range of g [0.2-0.3, etc.]) each range of g [0.2-0.3, etc.])
    Results are saved in database
    Results are saved in histogram
    Waveform analyzed to determine whether the Waveform analyzed to determine whether t
    Figure US20050116117A1-20050602-P00899
    frequency of significant peaks (i.e. those over frequency of significant peaks (i.e. those ov
    Figure US20050116117A1-20050602-P00899
    some set number [typically 0.5 g]) is greater than some set number [typically 0.5 g]) is greater
    some other set number (typically 2-6 Hz) some other set number (typically 2-6 Hz)
    Histogram analyzed for trends to determine
    potential degradation of performance
    If trend alarm triggered, then alarm and
    histogram sent to base station
    If not, histogram forwarded at set period (e.g.
    month end)
    If any peak exceeds some set number (typically If any peak exceeds some set number (typic
    Figure US20050116117A1-20050602-P00899
    0.5 g), and frequency is not greater than trigger, 0.5 g), and frequency is not greater than trig
    Figure US20050116117A1-20050602-P00899
    then alarm is sent to base station regarding then alarm is sent to base station regarding
    possible bad track section possible bad track section
    Periodic geographic analysis done in central Periodic geographic analysis done in central
    server to determine any possible track server to determine any possible track
    anomalies. anomalies.

Claims (2)

1. A method of for truck hunting determination, comprising:
taking samples of side to side acceleration in a vehicle;
evaluating the samples by comparing the samples; and
determining the degree of truck hunting on the basis of the comparison.
2. An apparatus for truck hunting determination, comprising:
a side-to-side accelerometer;
a comparator responsive said accelerometer; and
an evaluator responsive to said comparator.
US10/935,688 1997-07-18 2004-09-07 Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination Abandoned US20050116117A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/935,688 US20050116117A1 (en) 1997-07-18 2004-09-07 Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US5314397P 1997-07-18 1997-07-18
US09/119,461 US6786458B1 (en) 1997-07-18 1998-07-20 Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination
US10/935,688 US20050116117A1 (en) 1997-07-18 2004-09-07 Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/119,461 Continuation US6786458B1 (en) 1997-07-18 1998-07-20 Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050116117A1 true US20050116117A1 (en) 2005-06-02

Family

ID=32929822

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/119,461 Expired - Lifetime US6786458B1 (en) 1997-07-18 1998-07-20 Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination
US10/935,688 Abandoned US20050116117A1 (en) 1997-07-18 2004-09-07 Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/119,461 Expired - Lifetime US6786458B1 (en) 1997-07-18 1998-07-20 Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US6786458B1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110224944A1 (en) * 2008-09-19 2011-09-15 Bombardier Transportation Gmbh Testable vibration monitoring device and method
CN110274778A (en) * 2019-08-01 2019-09-24 成都博仕腾科技有限公司 Rail truck shakes vehicle test method and system

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6786458B1 (en) * 1997-07-18 2004-09-07 Startrak, Llc Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination
ES2384005T3 (en) * 2008-09-19 2012-06-28 Bombardier Transportation Gmbh Instability monitoring device and system, in particular for a railway vehicle
DE102009015011A1 (en) * 2009-03-26 2010-10-07 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for monitoring the running stability of rail vehicles
US20110193710A1 (en) * 2010-02-05 2011-08-11 Par Technology Corporation Refrigerated container monitoring system
US9007205B2 (en) 2011-06-01 2015-04-14 Thermo King Corporation Embedded security system for environment-controlled transportation containers and method for detecting a security risk for environment-controlled transportation containers
CN106809252B (en) * 2016-12-22 2019-08-30 北京经纬信息技术公司 Method and system for automatic push of railway freight car safety monitoring and early warning information

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4735383A (en) * 1986-08-16 1988-04-05 Westinghouse Brake And Signal Company Limited Communicating vital control signals
US5622338A (en) * 1996-07-02 1997-04-22 Technical Services And Marketing Inc. Truck hunting detection and abatement apparatus using selective brake application
US6786458B1 (en) * 1997-07-18 2004-09-07 Startrak, Llc Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4393957A (en) * 1981-01-27 1983-07-19 Hawthorne V T Method of eliminating truck hunting in railway trucks
FI902898A0 (en) * 1988-10-13 1990-06-11 Sig Schweiz Industrieges LUTNINGSKOMPENSATOR FOER SNABBGAOENDE FORDON, SAERSKILT RAELSFORDON.
US5924654A (en) * 1997-10-06 1999-07-20 Zeftek, Inc. Railroad car sensing system

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4735383A (en) * 1986-08-16 1988-04-05 Westinghouse Brake And Signal Company Limited Communicating vital control signals
US5622338A (en) * 1996-07-02 1997-04-22 Technical Services And Marketing Inc. Truck hunting detection and abatement apparatus using selective brake application
US6786458B1 (en) * 1997-07-18 2004-09-07 Startrak, Llc Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110224944A1 (en) * 2008-09-19 2011-09-15 Bombardier Transportation Gmbh Testable vibration monitoring device and method
CN110274778A (en) * 2019-08-01 2019-09-24 成都博仕腾科技有限公司 Rail truck shakes vehicle test method and system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US6786458B1 (en) 2004-09-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9245391B2 (en) Driver risk assessment system and method employing automated driver log
US9685098B1 (en) Driver compliance risk adjustments
US7659827B2 (en) System and method for taking risk out of driving
US8666590B2 (en) System and method for naming, filtering, and recall of remotely monitored event data
US20080122603A1 (en) Vehicle operator performance history recording, scoring and reporting systems
CN105259304B (en) On-line monitoring system and method for pollutants in vehicle tail gas
US20080147267A1 (en) Methods of Discretizing data captured at event data recorders
CN101716945B (en) Railway locomotive axle infrared thermal image monitoring method and system
US20100250021A1 (en) Driver Risk Assessment System and Method Having Calibrating Automatic Event Scoring
US20150006023A1 (en) System and method for determination of vheicle accident information
US20070257804A1 (en) System and Method for Reducing Driving Risk With Foresight
CN108444727A (en) Vehicular remote monitoring method, monitoring device and monitoring system
CN116579619B (en) Air control method and system for freight bill
US20050116117A1 (en) Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination
JP2014167788A (en) Method for recording vehicle-relevant data, in particular for detecting and evaluating minor damage, sensor device to be installed in vehicle, and vehicle having the sensor device for carrying out the method
WO2019207848A1 (en) Management assistance system
US20080161996A1 (en) Method for dealing with traffic accident and apparatus thereof
US11590982B1 (en) Trip based characterization using micro prediction determinations
CN113450474A (en) Driving video data processing method and device and electronic equipment
CN116913099A (en) Intelligent traffic real-time monitoring system
CN108564792A (en) Overload of vehicle monitoring method and system
CN114202922A (en) Public transport travel service big data acquisition and analysis platform
CN114328622A (en) Data anomaly capture real-time processing method and system for large data flow type calculation
CN118210262B (en) Real-time state monitoring management system for network vehicle
CN112394040A (en) Motor vehicle pollution discharge supervision system and method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载