US20050116117A1 - Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination - Google Patents
Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20050116117A1 US20050116117A1 US10/935,688 US93568804A US2005116117A1 US 20050116117 A1 US20050116117 A1 US 20050116117A1 US 93568804 A US93568804 A US 93568804A US 2005116117 A1 US2005116117 A1 US 2005116117A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- truck hunting
- peak
- peaks
- samples
- truck
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 5
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 12
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61K—AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR RAILWAYS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B61K9/00—Railway vehicle profile gauges; Detecting or indicating overheating of components; Apparatus on locomotives or cars to indicate bad track sections; General design of track recording vehicles
Definitions
- This invention relates to methods and apparatus for determination of truck hunting.
- One embodiment of the invention involves taking samples of side to side acceleration in a vehicle, evaluating the samples by comparing the samples, and determining the degree of truck hunting on the basis of the comparison.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic elevation of an embodiment of the invention in the form of a railroad car including equipment for truck hunting determination.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic elevation of an embodiment of the invention showing a vehicle roof line with a solar panel.
- FIGS. 3 and 4 are graphs illustrating performance under various conditions.
- Truck hunting is defined as a lateral movement from side to side of a railcar.
- the AAR has set parameters for defining problematic truck hunting as 10 or more events of greater than 0.75 g at a rate of 2-6 Hz. Lower levels of events are indicative of degradation of railcar components, and could further degrade.
- the aforementioned shaking leaves a measurable lateral signature on the y-axis accelerometer. This signature will be captured and monitored for evaluation under two different scenarios. The first deals with routine car health evaluation and monitoring, the second with truck hunting “events” in which the hunting exceeds certain levels.
- the unit During the course of operation, the unit will be taking samples and evaluating them (see below). The comparison of energy and peaks over time is one way to determine the level of truck hunting.
- the second method involves evaluating specific events that exceed certain set parameters, In this case, should the peak g exceed this number, then further analysis is done to determine whether it is a hunting event, or the car has gone over a piece of bad track.
- the unit will take the 3 second buffer and an additional continuous 7 seconds (for a total of ten) and analyze the number of peaks over a set g to determine if there has been a hunting event, or something else.
- Each sample will have a number of peaks during the sample period. These peak numbers will be captured and stored in a database for eventual use in the truck hunting histogram.
- the data itself will be stored in the following format:
- bins will be stored on-car until the car is queried (once or twice a month) and then compiled into two histograms: one for unloaded, one for when the car is loaded.
- the histogram will have the number of peaks between these g levels within specific ranges of speed (see chart below). 0.2-0.299 g 0.3-0.399 g 0.4-0.499 g 0.5-0.599 g 0.6-0.699 g 0.7+ g 10-19.9 mph 20-29.9 mph 30-39.9 mph 40-49.9 mph 50-59.9 mph 60+ mph
- At least two 36 bin histograms will be forwarded; one for when the car is unloaded, one for when the car is loaded.
- the addition of the two histograms together can all be done on the data server.
- the forwarded histograms will then be compared to the historical histograms we have on file. And significant changes can be noted and forwarded to the customer.
- the specific changes that might signal a trend towards truck hunting include any move towards the right columns (i.e. higher peak g's).
- the unit will automatically wake and capture data if y-axis peak g's exceed a certain level (i.e. 0.5 g). At this point the unit will save the buffer and capture for an additional period of time.
- a certain level i.e. 0.5 g
- Results are saved in database
- Results are saved in histogram Waveform analyzed to determine whether the Waveform analyzed to determine whether t frequency of significant peaks (i.e. those over frequency of significant peaks (i.e. those ov some set number [typically 0.5 g]) is greater than some set number [typically 0.5 g]) is greater some other set number (typically 2-6 Hz) some other set number (typically 2-6 Hz) Histogram analyzed for trends to determine potential degradation of performance If trend alarm triggered, then alarm and histogram sent to base station If not, histogram forwarded at set period (e.g.
- any peak exceeds some set number typically If any peak exceeds some set number (typic 0.5 g), and frequency is not greater than trigger, 0.5 g), and frequency is not greater than trig then alarm is sent to base station regarding then alarm is sent to base station regarding possible bad track section possible bad track section Periodic geographic analysis done in central Periodic geographic analysis done in central server to determine any possible track server to determine any possible track anomalies. anomalies.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
Abstract
Truck hunting determination involves taking samples of side to side acceleration in a vehicle, evaluating the samples by comparing the samples, and determining the degree of truck hunting on the basis of the comparison.
Description
- This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/119,461 filed Jul. 19, 1998, which claims priority of Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/053,143 filed Jul. 18, 1997. Applicant claims the priority benefit under 35 USC 120 of each of these applications.
- This invention relates to methods and apparatus for determination of truck hunting.
- The various means for determination of truck hunting, that is lateral movement, in railroad cars and other cargo carriers have depended on cumbersome and inaccurate arrangements which are difficult to transmit to remote locations.
- One embodiment of the invention involves taking samples of side to side acceleration in a vehicle, evaluating the samples by comparing the samples, and determining the degree of truck hunting on the basis of the comparison.
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic elevation of an embodiment of the invention in the form of a railroad car including equipment for truck hunting determination. -
FIG. 2 is a schematic elevation of an embodiment of the invention showing a vehicle roof line with a solar panel. -
FIGS. 3 and 4 are graphs illustrating performance under various conditions. - 1. Truck Hunting Determination
- 1.1. Definition
- Truck hunting is defined as a lateral movement from side to side of a railcar. The AAR has set parameters for defining problematic truck hunting as 10 or more events of greater than 0.75 g at a rate of 2-6 Hz. Lower levels of events are indicative of degradation of railcar components, and could further degrade.
- 1.2. Determination
- The aforementioned shaking leaves a measurable lateral signature on the y-axis accelerometer. This signature will be captured and monitored for evaluation under two different scenarios. The first deals with routine car health evaluation and monitoring, the second with truck hunting “events” in which the hunting exceeds certain levels.
- 1.2.1. Identification of Truck Hunting Events
- Two methods are available to capture this problem. They are:
- 1.2.1.1. Routine Monitoring
- During the course of operation, the unit will be taking samples and evaluating them (see below). The comparison of energy and peaks over time is one way to determine the level of truck hunting.
- 1.2.1.2. Event Monitoring
- The second method involves evaluating specific events that exceed certain set parameters, In this case, should the peak g exceed this number, then further analysis is done to determine whether it is a hunting event, or the car has gone over a piece of bad track.
- The unit will take the 3 second buffer and an additional continuous 7 seconds (for a total of ten) and analyze the number of peaks over a set g to determine if there has been a hunting event, or something else.
- 1.2.2. Truck Hunting Health Evaluation and Monitoring
- 10 second y-axis samples will be taken periodically (2-4 times per hour) throughout the day, and only when the car is moving.
- 1.2.2.1. Sample Analysis
- Each sample will have a number of peaks during the sample period. These peak numbers will be captured and stored in a database for eventual use in the truck hunting histogram. The data itself will be stored in the following format:
- Date/time, speed, mass, peaks, peak2, peak3, peak4, peak5, peak6
- Where:
-
- Peak1=The number of peaks between 0.2-0.299 g
- Peak2=The number of peaks between 0.3-0.399 g
- Peak3=The number of peaks between 0.4-0.499 g
- Peak4=The number of peaks between 0.5-0.599 g
- Peak5=The number of peaks between 0.6-0.699 g
- Peak6=The number of peaks at or above 0.7 g
- These bins will be stored on-car until the car is queried (once or twice a month) and then compiled into two histograms: one for unloaded, one for when the car is loaded.
- 1.2.2.2. Truck Hunting Histogram
- The histogram will have the number of peaks between these g levels within specific ranges of speed (see chart below).
0.2-0.299 g 0.3-0.399 g 0.4-0.499 g 0.5-0.599 g 0.6-0.699 g 0.7+ g 10-19.9 mph 20-29.9 mph 30-39.9 mph 40-49.9 mph 50-59.9 mph 60+ mph - As the mass of the car may affect the hunting signature, at least two 36 bin histograms will be forwarded; one for when the car is unloaded, one for when the car is loaded. The addition of the two histograms together can all be done on the data server.
- 1.2.2.3. Trend Analysis
- The forwarded histograms will then be compared to the historical histograms we have on file. And significant changes can be noted and forwarded to the customer. The specific changes that might signal a trend towards truck hunting include any move towards the right columns (i.e. higher peak g's).
- 1.2.3. On-Car Parameters
- One of the benefits to the RM7000 system is the two way communication and the fact that much of the analysis and parameters are dynamic. We can, therefore, remotely set the key parameters as we learn more about the functioning of the cars. The key remote-settable parameters are:
-
- Sample frequency—The number of times per day (e.g. 2 times/hour) that a sample is taken
- Sample duration—The length of time (e.g. 10 seconds) that a sample lasts
- Alarm trigger—The peak g that must be exceeded (e.g. 0.5 g) for capture to start and for analysis to be done on the captured sample.
- Bin parameters—Histogram parameters (speed and g ranges)
1.2.4. Commands - Reset—Will reset/re-calibrate the data on-car. This is needed if a repair has recently been done, etc.
1.2.5. Messages
1.2.6. Alarm—Wake
- The unit will automatically wake and capture data if y-axis peak g's exceed a certain level (i.e. 0.5 g). At this point the unit will save the buffer and capture for an additional period of time.
- This analysis will evaluate whether there have been a number of peaks over certain levels within the sample period of time. These parameters will be set in a manner similar to the AAR definitions. For example:
- If the number of peaks over 0.5 g is greater than some set number (5-10) then an alarm message is sent to the customer, alerting them to the potential problem.
- 1.2.7. Alarm—Badswitch
- If the peak exceeds some other number (e.g. 1 g) and seems to be a single event, then another alarm is sent, indicating that there was a bad switch, or perhaps a bad section of track or other anomaly.
Summary of Truck Hunting Health Determination Event Flow During Standard Monitoring After Awakening from Trigger Sample waveform (typically 10 seconds) is Sample waveform is taken (3 seconds from taken buffer, 7 additional seconds, for total of 10) Peak Analysis is performed (i.e. # peaks within Peak Analysis is performed (i.e. # peaks wi each range of g [0.2-0.3, etc.]) each range of g [0.2-0.3, etc.]) Results are saved in database Results are saved in histogram Waveform analyzed to determine whether the Waveform analyzed to determine whether t frequency of significant peaks (i.e. those over frequency of significant peaks (i.e. those ov some set number [typically 0.5 g]) is greater than some set number [typically 0.5 g]) is greater some other set number (typically 2-6 Hz) some other set number (typically 2-6 Hz) Histogram analyzed for trends to determine potential degradation of performance If trend alarm triggered, then alarm and histogram sent to base station If not, histogram forwarded at set period (e.g. month end) If any peak exceeds some set number (typically If any peak exceeds some set number (typic 0.5 g), and frequency is not greater than trigger, 0.5 g), and frequency is not greater than trig then alarm is sent to base station regarding then alarm is sent to base station regarding possible bad track section possible bad track section Periodic geographic analysis done in central Periodic geographic analysis done in central server to determine any possible track server to determine any possible track anomalies. anomalies.
Claims (2)
1. A method of for truck hunting determination, comprising:
taking samples of side to side acceleration in a vehicle;
evaluating the samples by comparing the samples; and
determining the degree of truck hunting on the basis of the comparison.
2. An apparatus for truck hunting determination, comprising:
a side-to-side accelerometer;
a comparator responsive said accelerometer; and
an evaluator responsive to said comparator.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/935,688 US20050116117A1 (en) | 1997-07-18 | 2004-09-07 | Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US5314397P | 1997-07-18 | 1997-07-18 | |
US09/119,461 US6786458B1 (en) | 1997-07-18 | 1998-07-20 | Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination |
US10/935,688 US20050116117A1 (en) | 1997-07-18 | 2004-09-07 | Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/119,461 Continuation US6786458B1 (en) | 1997-07-18 | 1998-07-20 | Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20050116117A1 true US20050116117A1 (en) | 2005-06-02 |
Family
ID=32929822
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/119,461 Expired - Lifetime US6786458B1 (en) | 1997-07-18 | 1998-07-20 | Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination |
US10/935,688 Abandoned US20050116117A1 (en) | 1997-07-18 | 2004-09-07 | Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/119,461 Expired - Lifetime US6786458B1 (en) | 1997-07-18 | 1998-07-20 | Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US6786458B1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110224944A1 (en) * | 2008-09-19 | 2011-09-15 | Bombardier Transportation Gmbh | Testable vibration monitoring device and method |
CN110274778A (en) * | 2019-08-01 | 2019-09-24 | 成都博仕腾科技有限公司 | Rail truck shakes vehicle test method and system |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6786458B1 (en) * | 1997-07-18 | 2004-09-07 | Startrak, Llc | Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination |
ES2384005T3 (en) * | 2008-09-19 | 2012-06-28 | Bombardier Transportation Gmbh | Instability monitoring device and system, in particular for a railway vehicle |
DE102009015011A1 (en) * | 2009-03-26 | 2010-10-07 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for monitoring the running stability of rail vehicles |
US20110193710A1 (en) * | 2010-02-05 | 2011-08-11 | Par Technology Corporation | Refrigerated container monitoring system |
US9007205B2 (en) | 2011-06-01 | 2015-04-14 | Thermo King Corporation | Embedded security system for environment-controlled transportation containers and method for detecting a security risk for environment-controlled transportation containers |
CN106809252B (en) * | 2016-12-22 | 2019-08-30 | 北京经纬信息技术公司 | Method and system for automatic push of railway freight car safety monitoring and early warning information |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4735383A (en) * | 1986-08-16 | 1988-04-05 | Westinghouse Brake And Signal Company Limited | Communicating vital control signals |
US5622338A (en) * | 1996-07-02 | 1997-04-22 | Technical Services And Marketing Inc. | Truck hunting detection and abatement apparatus using selective brake application |
US6786458B1 (en) * | 1997-07-18 | 2004-09-07 | Startrak, Llc | Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4393957A (en) * | 1981-01-27 | 1983-07-19 | Hawthorne V T | Method of eliminating truck hunting in railway trucks |
FI902898A0 (en) * | 1988-10-13 | 1990-06-11 | Sig Schweiz Industrieges | LUTNINGSKOMPENSATOR FOER SNABBGAOENDE FORDON, SAERSKILT RAELSFORDON. |
US5924654A (en) * | 1997-10-06 | 1999-07-20 | Zeftek, Inc. | Railroad car sensing system |
-
1998
- 1998-07-20 US US09/119,461 patent/US6786458B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2004
- 2004-09-07 US US10/935,688 patent/US20050116117A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4735383A (en) * | 1986-08-16 | 1988-04-05 | Westinghouse Brake And Signal Company Limited | Communicating vital control signals |
US5622338A (en) * | 1996-07-02 | 1997-04-22 | Technical Services And Marketing Inc. | Truck hunting detection and abatement apparatus using selective brake application |
US6786458B1 (en) * | 1997-07-18 | 2004-09-07 | Startrak, Llc | Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110224944A1 (en) * | 2008-09-19 | 2011-09-15 | Bombardier Transportation Gmbh | Testable vibration monitoring device and method |
CN110274778A (en) * | 2019-08-01 | 2019-09-24 | 成都博仕腾科技有限公司 | Rail truck shakes vehicle test method and system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6786458B1 (en) | 2004-09-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9245391B2 (en) | Driver risk assessment system and method employing automated driver log | |
US9685098B1 (en) | Driver compliance risk adjustments | |
US7659827B2 (en) | System and method for taking risk out of driving | |
US8666590B2 (en) | System and method for naming, filtering, and recall of remotely monitored event data | |
US20080122603A1 (en) | Vehicle operator performance history recording, scoring and reporting systems | |
CN105259304B (en) | On-line monitoring system and method for pollutants in vehicle tail gas | |
US20080147267A1 (en) | Methods of Discretizing data captured at event data recorders | |
CN101716945B (en) | Railway locomotive axle infrared thermal image monitoring method and system | |
US20100250021A1 (en) | Driver Risk Assessment System and Method Having Calibrating Automatic Event Scoring | |
US20150006023A1 (en) | System and method for determination of vheicle accident information | |
US20070257804A1 (en) | System and Method for Reducing Driving Risk With Foresight | |
CN108444727A (en) | Vehicular remote monitoring method, monitoring device and monitoring system | |
CN116579619B (en) | Air control method and system for freight bill | |
US20050116117A1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for truck hunting determination | |
JP2014167788A (en) | Method for recording vehicle-relevant data, in particular for detecting and evaluating minor damage, sensor device to be installed in vehicle, and vehicle having the sensor device for carrying out the method | |
WO2019207848A1 (en) | Management assistance system | |
US20080161996A1 (en) | Method for dealing with traffic accident and apparatus thereof | |
US11590982B1 (en) | Trip based characterization using micro prediction determinations | |
CN113450474A (en) | Driving video data processing method and device and electronic equipment | |
CN116913099A (en) | Intelligent traffic real-time monitoring system | |
CN108564792A (en) | Overload of vehicle monitoring method and system | |
CN114202922A (en) | Public transport travel service big data acquisition and analysis platform | |
CN114328622A (en) | Data anomaly capture real-time processing method and system for large data flow type calculation | |
CN118210262B (en) | Real-time state monitoring management system for network vehicle | |
CN112394040A (en) | Motor vehicle pollution discharge supervision system and method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |