US20050042606A9 - Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories - Google Patents
Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20050042606A9 US20050042606A9 US10/121,120 US12112002A US2005042606A9 US 20050042606 A9 US20050042606 A9 US 20050042606A9 US 12112002 A US12112002 A US 12112002A US 2005042606 A9 US2005042606 A9 US 2005042606A9
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- seq
- bacterial
- sample
- probe
- primers
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/195—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria
- C07K14/315—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria from Streptococcus (G), e.g. Enterococci
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/195—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/195—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria
- C07K14/21—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria from Pseudomonadaceae (F)
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/195—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria
- C07K14/21—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria from Pseudomonadaceae (F)
- C07K14/212—Moraxellaceae, e.g. Acinetobacter, Moraxella, Oligella, Psychrobacter
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/195—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria
- C07K14/24—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria from Enterobacteriaceae (F), e.g. Citrobacter, Serratia, Proteus, Providencia, Morganella, Yersinia
- C07K14/245—Escherichia (G)
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/195—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria
- C07K14/24—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria from Enterobacteriaceae (F), e.g. Citrobacter, Serratia, Proteus, Providencia, Morganella, Yersinia
- C07K14/26—Klebsiella (G)
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/195—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria
- C07K14/285—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria from Pasteurellaceae (F), e.g. Haemophilus influenza
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/195—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria
- C07K14/305—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria from Micrococcaceae (F)
- C07K14/31—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria from Micrococcaceae (F) from Staphylococcus (G)
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/195—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria
- C07K14/315—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria from Streptococcus (G), e.g. Enterococci
- C07K14/3156—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria from Streptococcus (G), e.g. Enterococci from Streptococcus pneumoniae (Pneumococcus)
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
- C12Q1/6876—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes
- C12Q1/6888—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for detection or identification of organisms
- C12Q1/689—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for detection or identification of organisms for bacteria
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
- C12Q1/6876—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes
- C12Q1/6888—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for detection or identification of organisms
- C12Q1/6895—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for detection or identification of organisms for plants, fungi or algae
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
- C12Q2600/16—Primer sets for multiplex assays
Definitions
- Bacteria are classically identified by their ability to utilize different substrates as a source of carbon and nitrogen through the use of biochemical tests such as the API20ETM system. Susceptibility testing of Gram negative bacilli has progressed to microdilution tests. Although the API and the microdilution systems are cost-effective, at least two days are required to obtain preliminary results due to the necessity of two successive overnight incubations to isolate and identify the bacteria from the specimen. Some faster detection methods with sophisticated and expensive apparatus have been developed. For example, the fastest identification system, the autoSCAN-Walk-Away systemTM identifies both Gram negative and Gram positive from isolated bacterial colonies in 2 hours and susceptibility patterns to antibiotics in only 7 hours.
- Urine specimens found positive by culture are further characterized using standard biochemical tests to identify the bacterial pathogen and are also tested for susceptibility to antibiotics.
- DNA probe and DNA amplification technologies offer several advantages over conventional methods. There is no need for subculturing, hence the organism can be detected directly in clinical samples thereby reducing the costs and time associated with isolation of pathogens. DNA-based technologies have proven to be extremely useful for specific applications in the clinical microbiology laboratory. For example, kits for the detection of fastidious organisms based on the use of hybridization probes or DNA amplification for the direct detection of pathogens in clinical specimens are commercially available (Persing et al, 1993. Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: Principles and Applications, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.).
- the present invention is an advantageous alternative to the conventional culture identification methods used in hospital clinical microbiology laboratories and in private clinics for routine diagnosis. Besides being much faster, DNA-based diagnostic tests are more accurate than standard biochemical tests presently used for diagnosis because the bacterial genotype (e.g. DNA level) is more stable than the bacterial phenotype (e.g. biochemical properties).
- the originality of this invention is that genomic DNA fragments (size of at least 100 base pairs) specific for 12 species of commonly encountered bacterial pathogens were selected from genomic libraries or from data banks.
- Amplification primers or oligonucleotide probes (both less than 100 nucleotides in length) which are both derived from the sequence of species-specific DNA fragments identified by hybridization from genomic libraries or from selected data bank sequences are used as a basis to develop diagnostic tests. Oligonucleotide primers and probes for the detection of commonly encountered and clinically important bacterial resistance genes are also included. For example, Annexes I and II present a list of suitable oligonucleotide probes and PCR primers which were all derived from the species-specific DNA fragments selected from genomic libraries or from data bank sequences.
- oligonucleotide sequences appropriate for the specific detection of the above bacterial species other than those listed in Annexes 1 and 2 may be derived from the species-specific fragments or from the selected data bank sequences.
- the oligonucleotides may be shorter or longer than the ones we have chosen and may be selected anywhere else in the identified species-specific sequences or selected data bank sequences.
- the oligonucleotides may be designed for use in amplification methods other than PCR.
- the core of this invention is the identification of species-specific genomic DNA fragments from bacterial genomic DNA libraries and the selection of genomic DNA fragments from data bank sequences which are used as a source of species-specific and ubiquitous oligonucleotides.
- the selection of oligonucleotides suitable for diagnostic purposes from the sequence of the species-specific fragments or from the selected data bank sequences requires much effort it is quite possible for the individual skilled in the art to derive from our fragments or selected data bank sequences suitable oligonucleotides which are different from the ones we have selected and tested as examples (Annexes I and II).
- oligonucleotide primers and probes were selected from the highly conserved 16S or 23S rRNA genes to detect all bacterial pathogens possibly encountered in clinical specimens in order to determine whether a clinical specimen is infected or not. This strategy allows rapid screening out of the numerous negative clinical specimens submitted for bacteriological testing.
- sequence from genomic DNA fragments (size of at least 100 base pairs and all described in the sequence listing) selected either by hybridization from genomic libraries or from data banks and which are specific for the detection of commonly encountered bacterial pathogens (i.e.
- Escherichia coli Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis ) in clinical specimens.
- These bacterial species are associated with approximately 90% of urinary tract infections and with a high percentage of other severe infections including septicemia, meningitis, pneumonia, intraabdominal infections, skin infections and many other severe respiratory tract infections. Overall, the above bacterial species may account for up to 80% of bacterial pathogens isolated in routine microbiology laboratories.
- Synthetic oligonucleotides for hybridization (probes) or DNA amplification (primers) were derived from the above species-specific DNA fragments (ranging in sizes from 0.25 to 5.0 kilobase pairs (kbp)) or from selected data bank sequences (GenBank and EMBL).
- Bacterial species for which some of the oligonucleotide probes and amplification primers were derived from selected data bank sequences are Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus pyogenes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
- hybridization with either fragment or oligonucleotide probes
- DNA amplification protocols for the detection of pathogens from clinical specimens renders possible a very rapid bacterial identification. This will greatly reduce the time currently required for the identification of pathogens in the clinical laboratory since these technologies can be applied for bacterial detection and identification directly from clinical specimens with minimum pretreatment of any biological specimens to release bacterial DNA.
- probes and amplification primers allow identification of the bacterial species directly from clinical specimens or, alternatively, from an isolated colony.
- DNA amplification assays have the added advantages of being faster and more sensitive than hybridization assays, since they allow rapid and exponential in vitro replication of the target segment of DNA from the bacterial genome.
- Universal probes and amplification primers selected from the 16S or 23S rRNA genes highly conserved among bacteria, which permit the detection of any bacterial pathogens, will serve as a procedure to screen out the numerous negative clinical specimens received in diagnostic laboratories.
- the use of oligonucleotide probes or primers complementary to characterized bacterial genes encoding resistance to antibiotics to identify commonly encountered and clinically important resistance genes is also under the scope of this invention.
- DNA fragment probes were developed for the following bacterial species: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis.
- Escherichia coli Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis.
- oligonucleotide sequences were exclusively derived from selected data bank sequences).
- the chromosomal DNA from each bacterial species for which probes were seeked was isolated using standard methods. DNA was digested with a frequently cutting restriction enzyme such as Sau3AI and then ligated into the bacterial plasmid vector pGEM3Zf (Promega) linearized by appropriate restriction endonuclease digestion. Recombinant plasmids were then used to transform competent E. coli strain DH5 ⁇ thereby yielding a genomic library. The plasmid content of the transformed bacterial cells was analyzed using standard methods. DNA fragments of target bacteria ranging in size from 0.25 to 5.0 kilobase pairs (kbp) were cut out from the vector by digestion of the recombinant plasmid with various restriction endonucleases. The insert was separated from the vector by agarose gel electrophoresis and purified in low melting point agarose gels. Each of the purified fragments of bacterial genomic DNA was then used as a probe for specificity tests.
- a frequently cutting restriction enzyme such as
- the gel-purified restriction fragments of unknown coding potential were labeled with the radioactive nucleotide ⁇ - 32 P(dATP) which was incorporated into the DNA fragment by the random priming labeling reaction.
- Non-radioactive modified nucleotides could also be incorporated into the DNA by this method to serve as a label.
- Each DNA fragment probe i.e. a segment of bacterial genomic DNA of at least 100 bp in length cut out from clones randomly selected from the genomic library
- the double-stranded labeled DNA probe was heat-denatured to yield labeled single-stranded DNA which could then hybridize to any single-stranded target DNA fixed onto a solid support or in solution.
- the target DNAs consisted of total cellular DNA from an array of bacterial species found in clinical samples (Table 5). Each target DNA was released from the bacterial cells and denatured by conventional methods and then irreversibly fixed onto a solid support (e.g. nylon or nitrocellulose membranes) or free in solution.
- Pre-hybridization, hybridization and post-hybridization conditions were as follows: (i) Pre-hybridization; in 1 M NaCl+10% dextran sulfate+1% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate)+1 ⁇ g/ml salmon sperm DNA at 650° C. for 15 min. (ii) Hybridization; in fresh pre-hybridization solution containing the labeled probe at 650° C. overnight.
- Species-specific DNA fragments selected from various bacterial genomic libraries ranging in size from 0.25 to 5.0 kbp were isolated for 10 common bacterial pathogens (Table 6) based on hybridization to chromosomal DNAs from a variety of bacteria performed as described above. All of the bacterial species tested (66 species listed in Table 5) were likely to be pathogens associated with common infections or potential contaminants which can be isolated from clinical specimens. A DNA fragment probe was considered specific only when it hybridized solely to the pathogen from which it was isolated. DNA fragment probes found to be specific were subsequently tested for their ubiquity (i.e. ubiquitous probes recognized most isolates of the target species) by hybridization to bacterial DNAs from approximately 10 to 80 clinical isolates of the species of interest (Table 6). The DNAs were denatured, fixed onto nylon membranes and hybridized as described above.
- nucleotide sequence of the totality or of a portion of the species-specific DNA fragments isolated was determined using the dideoxynucleotide termination sequencing method which was performed using Sequenase (USB Biochemicals) or T7 DNA polymerase (Pharmacia). These nucleotide sequences are shown in the sequence listing. Alternatively, sequences selected from data banks (GenBank and EMBL) were used as sources of oligonucleotides for diagnostic purposes for Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus pyogenes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
- oligonucleotide primers or probes derived from a variety of genomic DNA fragments (size of more than 100 bp) selected from data banks was tested for their specificity and ubiquity in PCR and hybridization assays as described later. It is important to note that the data bank sequences were selected based on their potential of being species-specific according to available sequence information. Only data bank sequences from which species-specific oligonucleotides could be derived are included in this invention.
- Oligonucleotide probes and amplification primers derived from species-specific fragments selected from the genomic libraries or from data bank sequences were synthesized using an automated DNA synthesizer (Millipore). Prior to synthesis, all oligonucleotides (probes for hybridization and primers for DNA amplification) were evaluated for their suitability for hybridization or DNA amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) by computer analysis using standard programs (e.g. Genetics Computer Group (GCG) and OligoTM 4.0 (National Biosciences)).
- GCG Genetics Computer Group
- OligoTM 4.0 National Biosciences
- PCR primer pairs were also evaluated prior to the synthesis by verifying the absence of unwanted features such as long stretches of one nucleotide, a high proportion of G or C residues at the 3′ end and a 3′-terminal T residue (Persing et al, 1993. Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: Principles and Applications, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.).
- oligonucleotides size less than 100 nucleotides
- have some advantages over DNA fragment probes for the detection of bacteria such as ease of preparation in large quantities, consistency in results from batch to batch and chemical stability.
- oligonucleotides were 5′ end-labeled with the radionucleotide ⁇ 32 P(ATP) using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Pharmacia).
- the unincorporated radionucleotide was removed by passing the labeled single-stranded oligonucleotide through a Sephadex G50 column.
- oligonucleotides were labeled with biotin, either enzymatically at their 3′ ends or incorporated directly during synthesis at their 5′ ends, or with digoxigenin. It will be appreciated by the person skilled in the art that labeling means other than the three above labels may be used.
- the target DNA was denatured, fixed onto a solid support and hybridized as previously described for the DNA fragment probes.
- Conditions for pre-hybridization and hybridization were as described earlier.
- Post-hybridization washing conditions were as follows: twice in 3 ⁇ SSC containing 1% SDS, twice in 2 ⁇ SSC containing 1% SDS and twice in 1 ⁇ SSC containing 1% SDS (all of these washes were at 65° C. for 15 min ), and a final wash in 0.1 ⁇ SSC containing 1% SDS at 25° C. for 15 min.
- For probes labeled with radioactive labels the detection of hybrids was by autoradiography as described earlier.
- For non-radioactive labels detection may be calorimetric or by chemiluminescence.
- the oligonucleotide probes may be derived from either strand of the duplex DNA.
- the probes may consist of the bases A, G, C, or T or analogs.
- the probes may be of any suitable length and may be selected anywhere within the species-specific genomic DNA fragments selected from the genomic libraries or from data bank sequences.
- primer pairs were derived either from the sequenced species-specific DNA fragments or from data bank sequences or, alternatively, were shortened versions of oligonucleotide probes. Prior to synthesis, the potential primer pairs were analyzed by using the program oligoTM 4.0 (National Biosciences) to verify that they are likely candidates for PCR amplifications.
- Clinical specimens or bacterial colonies were added directly to the 50 ⁇ L PCR reaction mixtures containing 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 2.5 mM MgCl 2, 0.4 ⁇ M of each of the two primers, 200 ⁇ M of each of the four dNTPs and 1.25 Units of Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin Elmer). PCR reactions were then subjected to thermal cycling (3 min at 95° C. followed by 30 cycles of 1 second at 95° C. and 1 second at 55° C.) using a Perkin Elmer 480TM thermal cycler and subsequently analyzed by standard ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel electrophoresis.
- glycerol or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or other related solvents can be used to increase the sensitivity of the PCR and to overcome problems associated with the amplification of target with a high GC content or with strong secondary structures.
- concentration ranges for glycerol and DMSO are 5-15% (v/v) and 3-10% (v ⁇ v), respectively.
- concentration ranges for the amplification primers and the MgCl 2 are 0.1-1.0 ⁇ M and 1.5-3.5 mM, respectively. Modifications of the standard PCR protocol using external and nested primers (i.e. nested PCR) or using more than one primer pair (i.e.
- multiplex PCR may also be used (Persing et al, 1993. Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: Principles and Applications, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.). For more details about the PCR protocols and amplicon detection methods see examples 7 and 8.
- LCR ligase chain reaction
- TAS transcription-based amplification systems
- NASBA self-sustained sequence replication
- SDA strand displacement amplification
- bDNA branched DNA
- oligonucleotide probes derived either from the sequenced species-specific fragments or from data bank sequences, was tested by hybridization to DNAs from the array of bacterial species listed in Table 5 as previously described. Oligonucleotides found to be specific were subsequently tested for their ubiquity by hybridization to bacterial DNAs from approximately 80 isolates of the target species as described for fragment probes. Probes were considered ubiquitous when they hybridized specifically with the DNA from at least 80% of the isolates. Results for specificity and ubiquity tests with the oligonucleotide probes are summarized in Table 6. The specificity and ubiquity of the amplification primer pairs were tested directly from cultures (see example 7) of the same bacterial strains.
- PCR assays were performed directly from bacterial colonies of approximately 80 isolates of the target species. Results are summarized in Table 7. All specific and ubiquitous oligonucleotide probes and amplification primers for each of the 12 bacterial species investigated are listed in Annexes I and II, respectively. Divergence in the sequenced DNA fragments can occur and, insofar as the divergence of these sequences or a part thereof does not affect the specificity of the probes or amplification primers, variant bacterial DNA is under the scope of this invention.
- oligonucleotides and amplification primers were therefore synthesized from highly conserved portions of bacterial 16S or 23S ribosomal RNA gene sequences available in data banks (Annexes III and IV).
- a pool of seven oligonucleotides (Annex I; Table 6) hybridized strongly to DNA from all bacterial species listed in Table 5.
- This pool of universal probes labeled with radionucleotides or with any other modified nucleotides is consequently very useful for detection of bacteria in urine samples with a sensitivity range of ⁇ 10 7 CFU/L. These probes can also be applied for bacterial detection in other clinical samples.
- Amplification primers also derived from the sequence of highly conserved ribosomal RNA genes were used as an alternative strategy for universal bacterial detection directly from clinical specimens (Annex IV; Table 7).
- the DNA amplification strategy was developed to increase the sensitivity and the rapidity of the test. This amplification test was ubiquitous since it specifically amplified DNA from 23 different bacterial species encountered in clinical specimens.
- ribosomal RNA genes could also be good candidates for universal bacterial detection directly from clinical specimens. Such genes may be associated with processes essential for bacterial survival (e.g. protein synthesis, DNA synthesis, cell division or DNA repair) and could therefore be highly conserved during evolution. We are working on these candidate genes to develop new rapid tests for the universal detection of bacteria directly from clinical specimens.
- Antimicrobial resistance complicates treatment and often leads to therapeutic failures. Furthermore, overuse of antibiotics inevitably leads to the emergence of bacterial resistance. Our goal is to provide the clinicians, within one hour, the needed information to prescribe optimal treatments. Besides the rapid identification of negative clinical specimens with DNA-based tests for universal bacterial detection and the identification of the presence of a specific pathogen in the positive specimens with DNA-based tests for specific bacterial detection, the clinicians also need timely information about the ability of the bacterial pathogen to resist antibiotic treatments. We feel that the most efficient strategy to evaluate rapidly bacterial resistance to antimicrobials is to detect directly from the clinical specimens the most common and important antibiotic resistance genes (i.e. DNA-based tests for the detection of antibiotic resitance genes).
- any recombinant plasmids and corresponding transformed host cells are under the scope of this invention.
- the plasmid content of the transformed bacterial cells was analyzed using standard methods. DNA fragments from target bacteria ranging in size from 0.25 to 5.0 kbp were cut out from the vector by digestion of the recombinant plasmid with various restriction endonucleases. The insert was separated from the vector by agarose gel electrophoresis and purified in a low melting point agarose gel. Each of the purified fragments was then used for specificity tests.
- the label used was ⁇ 32 P(dATP), a radioactive nucleotide which can be incorporated enzymatically into a double-stranded DNA molecule.
- the fragment of interest is first denatured by heating at 95° C. for 5 min, then a mixture of random primers is allowed to anneal to the strands of the fragments. These primers, once annealed, provide a starting point for synthesis of DNA.
- DNA polymerase usually the Klenow fragment, is provided along with the four nucleotides, one of which is radioactive. When the reaction is terminated, the mixture of new DNA molecules is once again denatured to provide radioactive single-stranded DNA molecules (i.e. the probe).
- other modified nucleotides may be used to label the probes.
- Species-specific DNA fragments ranging in size from 0.25 to 5.0 kbp were isolated for 10 common bacterial pathogens (Table 6) based on hybridization to chromosomal DNAs from a variety of bacteria. Samples of whole cell DNA for each bacterial strain listed in Table 5 were transferred onto a nylon membrane using a dot blot apparatus, washed and denatured before being irreversibly fixed. Hybridization conditions were as described earlier. A DNA fragment probe was considered specific only when it hybridized solely to the pathogen from which it was isolated. Labeled DNA fragments hybridizing specifically only to target bacterial species (i.e.
- testing of the strains is by colony hybridization.
- the bacterial strains were inoculated onto a nylon membrane placed on nutrient agar. The membranes were incubated at 37° C. for two hours and then bacterial lysis and DNA denaturation were carried out according to standard procedures. DNA hybridization was performed as described earlier.
- Nucleotide sequencina of DNA fragments The nucleotide sequence of the totality or a portion of each fragment found to be specific and ubiquitous (Example 1) was determined using the dideoxynucleotide termination sequencing method (Sanger et al., 1977, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 74:5463-5467). These DNA sequences are shown in the sequence listing. Oligonucleotide probes and amplification primers were selected from these nucleotide sequences, or alternatively, from selected data banks sequences and were then synthesized on an automated Biosearch synthesizer (MilliporeTM) using phosphoramidite chemistry.
- oliaonucleotides Labeling of oliaonucleotides.
- Each oligonucleotide was 5′ end-labeled with ⁇ 32 P-ATP by the T4 polynucleotide kinase (Pharmacia) as described earlier.
- the label could also be non-radioactive.
- oligonucleotide probes Specificity test for oligonucleotide probes. All labeled oligonucleotide probes were tested for their specificity by hybridization to DNAs from a variety of Gram positive and Gram negative bacterial species as described earlier. Species-specific probes were those hybridizing only to DNA from the bacterial species from which it was isolated. Oligonucleotide probes found to be specific were submitted to ubiquity tests as follows.
- Ubiquity test for oligonucleotide probes were then used in ubiquity tests with approximately 80 strains of the target species. Chromosomal DNAs from the isolates were transferred onto nylon membranes and hybridized with labeled oligonucleotide probes as described for specificity tests. The batteries of approximately 80 isolates constructed for each target species contain reference ATCC strains as well as a variety of clinical isolates obtained from various sources. Ubiquitous probes were those hybridizing to at least 80% of DNAs from the battery of clinical isolates of the target species. Examples of specific and ubiquitous oligonucleotide probes are listed in Annex 1.
- a pool of specific oligonucleotide probes is used for bacterial identification (i) to increase sensitivity and assure 100% ubiquity or (ii) to identify simultaneously more than one bacterial species. Bacterial identification could be done from isolated colonies or directly from clinical specimens.
- PCR amplification The technique of PCR was used to increase sensitivity and rapidity of the tests.
- the PCR primers used were often shorter derivatives of the extensive sets of oligonucleotides previously developed for hybridization assays (Table 6).
- the sets of primers were tested in PCR assays performed directly from a bacterial colony or from a bacterial suspension (see Example 7) to determine their specificity and ubiquity (Table 7). Examples of specific and ubiquitous PCR primer pairs are listed in annex II.
- PCR assays were performed either directly from a bacterial colony or from a bacterial suspension, the latter being adjusted to a standard McFarland 0.5 (corresponds to 1.5 ⁇ 10 8 bacteria/mL).
- McFarland 0.5 corresponds to 1.5 ⁇ 10 8 bacteria/mL.
- direct amplification from a colony a portion of the colony was transferred directly to a 50 ⁇ L PCR reaction mixture (containing 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris pH 8.3, 2.5 mM MgCl 2, 0.4 ⁇ M of each of the two primers, 200 ⁇ M of each of the four dNTPs and 1.25 Unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin Elmer)) using a plastic rod.
- PCR amplification products were then analyzed by standard agarose gel (2%) electrophoresis. Amplification products were visualized in agarose gels containing 2.5 ⁇ g/mL of ethidium bromide under UV at 254 nm. The entire PCR assay can be completed in approximately one hour.
- amplification from bacterial cultures was performed as described above but using a “hot start” protocol.
- an initial reaction mixture containing the target DNA, primers and dNTPs was heated at 85° C. prior to the addition of the other components of the PCR reaction mixture.
- the final concentration of all reagents was as described above.
- the PCR reactions were submitted to thermal cycling and analysis as described above.
- samples were routinely diluted in lysis buffer containing detergent(s). Subsequently, the lysate was added directly to the PCR reaction mixture. Heat treatments of the lysates, prior to DNA amplification, using the thermocycler or a microwave oven could also be performed to increase the efficiency of cell lysis.
- PCR has the advantage of being compatible with crude DNA preparations. For example, blood, cerebrospinal fluid and sera may be used directly in PCR assays after a brief heat treatment. We intend to use such rapid and simple strategies to develop fast protocols for DNA amplification from a variety of clinical specimens.
- Detection of antibiotic resistance genes The presence of specific antibiotic resistance genes which are frequently encountered and clinically relevant is identified using the PCR amplification or hybridization protocols described in previous sections. Specific oligonucleotides used as a basis for the DNA-based tests are selected from the antibiotic resistance gene sequences. These tests can be performed either directly from clinical specimens or from a bacterial colony and should complement diagnostic tests for specific bacterial identification.
- assays were performed by multiplex PCR (i.e. using several pairs of primers in a single PCR reaction) to (i) reach an ubiquity of 100% for the specific target pathogen or (ii) to detect simultaneously several species of bacterial pathogens.
- Multiplex PCR assays could also be used to (i) detect simultaneously several bacterial species or, alternatively, (ii) to simultaneously identify the bacterial pathogen and detect specific antibiotic resistance genes either directly from a clinical specimen or from a bacterial colony.
- amplicon detection methods should be adapted to differentiate the various amplicons produced.
- Standard agarose gel electrophoresis could be used because it discriminates the amplicons based on their sizes.
- Another useful strategy for this purpose would be detection using a variety of fluorochromes emitting at different wavelengths which are each coupled with a specific oligonucleotide linked to a fluorescence quencher which is degraded during amplification to release the fluorochrome (e.g. TaqManTM, Perkin Elmer).
- Detection of amplification Products The person skilled in the art will appreciate that alternatives other than standard agarose gel electrophoresis (Example 7) may be used for the revelation of amplification products. Such methods may be based on the detection of fluorescence after amplification (e.g. AmplisensorTM, Biotronics; TaqManTM) or other labels such as biotin (SHARP SignalTM system, Digene Diagnostics). These methods are quantitative and easily automated.
- One of the amplification primers or an internal oligonucleotide probe specific to the amplicon(s) derived from the species-specific fragment probes is coupled with the fluorochrome or with any other label. Methods based on the detection of fluorescence are particularly suitable for diagnostic tests since they are rapid and flexible as fluorochromes emitting different wavelengths are available (Perkin Elmer).
- Species-specific, universal and antibiotic resistance gene amplification primers can be used in other rapid amplification procedures such as the ligase chain reaction (LCR), transcription-based amplification systems (TAS), self-sustained sequence replication (3SR), nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA), strand displacement amplification (SDA) and branched DNA (bDNA) or any other methods to increase the sensitivity of the test.
- Amplifications can be performed from an isolated bacterial colony or directly from clinical specimens. The scope of this invention is therefore not limited to the use of PCR but rather includes the use of any procedures to specifically identify bacterial DNA and which may be used to increase rapidity and sensitivity of the tests.
- test kit would contain sets of probes specific for each bacterium as well as a set of universal probes.
- the kit is provided in the form of test components, consisting of the set of universal probes labeled with non-radioactive labels as well as labeled specific probes for the detection of each bacterium of interest in specific clinical samples.
- the kit will also include test reagents necessary to perform the pre-hybridization, hybridization, washing steps and hybrid detection. Finally, test components for the detection of known antibiotic resistance genes (or derivatives therefrom) will be included.
- the kit will include standard samples to be used as negative and positive controls for each hybridization test.
- kits Components to be included in the kits will be adapted to each specimen type and to detect pathogens commonly encountered in that type of specimen. Reagents for the universal detection of bacteria will also be included. Based on the sites of infection, the following kits for the specific detection of pathogens may be developed:
- test kits contain all reagents and controls to perform DNA amplification assays. Diagnostic kits will be adapted for amplification by PCR (or other amplification methods) performed directly either from clinical specimens or from a bacterial colony. Components required for universal bacterial detection, bacterial identification and antibiotic resistance genes detection will be included.
- Amplification assays could be performed either in tubes or in microtitration plates having multiple wells.
- the wells will be coated with the specific amplification primers and control DNAs and the detection of amplification products will be automated.
- Reagents and amplification primers for universal bacterial detection will be included in kits for tests performed directly from clinical specimens.
- Components required for bacterial identification and antibiotic resistance gene detection will be included in kits for testing directly from colonies as well as in kits for testing directly from clinical specimens.
- kits will be adapted for use with each type of specimen as described in example 13 for hybridization-based diagnostic kits.
- b Sizes of DNA fragments range from 0.25 to 5.0 kbp.
- a specific probe was considered ubiquitous when at least 80% of isolates of the target species (approximately 80 isolates) were recognized by each specific probe. When 2 or more probes are combined, 100% of the isolates are recognized.
- d These sequences were selected from data banks.
- e Ubiquity tested with approximately 10 isolates of the target species.
- f A majority of probes (8/9) do not discriminate E. coli and Shigella spp.
- influenzae 1 e (154-155) 217 80/80 + N.T. S. pneumoniae 1 e (156-157) 134 80/80 + N.T. 2 e (158-159) 197 74/80 + N.T. 3 (78-79) 175 67/80 + N.T. S. epidermidis 1 (147-148) 175 80/80 + N.T. 2 (145-146) 125 80/80 + N.T. S. aureus 1 (152-153) 108 80/80 + N.T. 2 (149-150) 151 80/80 + N.T. 3 (149-151) 176 80/80 + N.T. S. pyogenes f 1 e (141-142) 213 80/80 + N.T. 2 e (143-144) 157 24/24 + N.T. Universal 1 e (126-127) 241 194/195 g + + See notes on next page
- Annex I Specific and ubiquitous oligonucleotides probes for hybridization Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Bacterial species: Escherichia coli 44 5′-CAC CCG CTT GCG TGG CAA GCT GCC C 5 a 213-237 45 5′-CGT TTG TGG ATT CCA GTT CCA TCC G 5 a 489-513 48 5′-TGA AGC ACT GGC CGA AAT GCT GCG T 6 a 759-783 49 5′-GAT GTA CAG GAT TCG TTG AAG GCT T 6 a 898-922 50 5′-TAG CGA AGG CGT AGC AGA AAC TAA C 7 a 1264-1288 51 5′-GCA ACC CGA ACT CAA CGC CGG ATT T 7 a 1227-1251 52 5′-ATA CAC AAG GGT CGC ATC TGC GGC C 7 a 1313-1337 53 5′
- Annex I Specific and ubiquitous oligonucleotides probes for hybridization Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Bacterial species: Proteus mirabilis 76 5′-CCG CCT TTA GCA TTA ATT GGT GTT TAT AGT 13 246-275 77 5′-CCT ATT GCA GAT ACC TTA AAT GTC TTG GGC 13 291-320 80 b 5′-TTG AGT GAT GAT TTC ACT GAC TCC C 14 18-42 81 5′-GTG AGA CAG TGA TGG TGA GGA CAC A 15 a 1185-1209 82 5′-TGG TTG TCA TGC TGT TTG TGT GAA AAT 15 a 1224-1230 Bacterial species: Klebsiella pneumoniae 57 5′-GTG GTG TCG TTC AGG GGT TTC AC 8 45-67 58 5′-GCG ATA TTC ACA CCC T
- Annex I Specific and ubiquitous oligonucleotides probes for hybridization Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Bacterial species: Pseudomonas aeruginosa 87 5′-AAT GCG GCT GTA CCT CGG CGC TGG T 18 a 2985-3009 88 5′-GGC GGA GGG CCA GTT GCA CCT GCC A 18 a 2929-2953 89 5′-AGC CCT GCT CCT CGG CAG CCT CTG C 18 a 2821-2845 90 5′-TGG CTT TTG CAA CCG CGT TCA GGT T 18 a 1079-1103 91 5′-GCG CCC GCG AGG GCA TGC TTC GAT G 19 a 705-729 92 5′-ACC TGG GCG CCA ACT ACA AGT TCT A 19 a 668-692 93 5′-GGC TAC GCT GCC GGG CTG
- Annex I Specific and ubiquitous oligonucleotides probes for hybridization Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Bacterial species: Staphylococcus saprophyticus 96 5′-CGT TTT TAC CCT TAC CTT TTC GTA CTA CC 21 45-73 97 b 5′-TCA GGC AGA GGT AGT ACG AAA AGG TAA GGG 21 53-82 100 5′-CAC CAA GTT TGA CAC GTG AAG ATT CAT 22 89-115 101 b 5′-ATG AGT GAA GCG GAG TCA GAT TAT GTG CAG 23 105-134 102 5′-CGC TCA TTA CGT ACA GTG ACA ATC G 24 20-44 103 5′-CTG GTT AGC TTG ACT CTT AAC AAT CTT GTC 24 61-90 104 b 5′-GAC GCG ATT GTC ACT GTA CGT
- Annex I Specific and ubiquitous oligonucleotides probes for hybridization Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID Nucleotide SEQ ID NO Nucleotide sequence NO position Bacterial species: Haemophilus influenzae 105 b 5′-GCG TCA GAA AAA GTA GGC GAA ATG AAA G 25 138-165 106 b 5′-AGC GGC TCT ATC TTG TAA TGA CAC A 26 a 770-794 107 b 5′-GAA ACG TGA ACT CCC CTC TAT ATA A 27 a 5184-5208 Universal probes c 122 b 5′-ATC CCA CCT TAG GCG GCT GGC TCC A — — 123 5′-ACG TCA AGT CAT CAT GGC CCT TAC GAG TAG G — — 124 b 5′-GTG TGA CGG GCG GTG TGT ACA AGG C — — 125 b 5′-GAG TTG CAG ACT C
- Annex II Specific and ubiquitous primers for DNA amplification Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Bacterial species: Escherichia coli 42 5′-GCT TTC CAG CGT CAT ATT G 4 177-195 43 b 5′-GAT CTC GAC AAA ATG GTG A 4 260-278 46 5′-TCA CCC GCT TGC GTG GC 5 a 212-228 47 b 5′-GGA ACT GGA ATC CAC AAA C 5 a 490-508 55 5′-GCA ACC CGA ACT CAA CGC C 7 a 1227-1245 56 b 5′-GCA GAT GCG ACC CTT GTG T 7 a 1315-1333 131 5′-CAG GAG TAC GGT GAT TTT TA 3 60-79 132 b 5′-ATT TCT GGT TTG GTC ATA CA 3 174-193 Bacterial species: Enterococcus fa
- Annex II Specific and ubiquitous primers for DNA amplification Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Bacterial species: Klebsiella pneumoniae 61 5′-GAC AGT CAG TTC GTC AGC C 9 37-55 62 b 5′-CGT AGG GTG TGA ATA TCG C 9 161-179 67 5′-TCG CCC CTC ATC TGC TAC T 10 81-99 68 b 5′-GAT CGT GAT GGA TAT TCT T 10 260-278 135 5′-GCA GCG TGG TGT CGT TCA 8 40-57 136 b 5′-AGC TGG CAA CGG CTG GTC 8 170-187 137 5′-ATT CAC ACC CTA CGC AGC CA 9 166-185 138 b 5′-ATC CGG CAG CAT CTC TTT GT 9 262-281 Bacterial species: Proteus mirabilis 74 5′-
- Annex II Specific and ubiquitous primers for DNA amplification Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Bacterial species: Staphylococcus saprophyticus 98 5′-CGT TTT TAC CCT TAC CTT TTC GTA CT 21 45-70 99 b 5′-ATC GAT CAT CAC ATT CCA TTT GTT TTT A 21 143-170 139 5′-CTG GTT AGC TTG ACT CTT AAC AAT C 24 61-85 140 b 5′-TCT TAA CGA TAG AAT GGA GCA ACT G 24 226-250 Bacterial species: Pseudomonas aeruginosa 83 5′-CGA GCG GGT GGT GTT CAT C 16 a 554-572 84 b 5′-CAA GTC GTG GTG GGA GGG A 16 a 674-692 85 5′-TCG CTG TTC ATC AAG ACC C 17
- Annex II Specific and ubiquitous primers for DNA amplification Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Bacterial species: Staphylococcus epidermidis 145 5′-ATC AAA AAG TTG GCG AAC CTT TTC A 36 21-45 146 b 5′-CAA AAG AGC GTG GAG AAA AGT ATC A 36 121-145 147 5′-TCT CTT TTA ATT TCA TCT TCA ATT CCA TAG 36 448-477 148 b 5′-AAA CAC AAT TAC AGT CTG GTT ATC CAT ATC 36 593-622 Bacterial species: Staphylococcus aureus 149 b 5′-CTT CAT TTT ACG GTG ACT TCT TAG AAG ATT 37 409-438 150 5′-TCA ACT GTA GCT TCT TTA TCC ATA CGT TGA 37 288-317 149 b 5′-CTT
- Annex II Specific and ubiquitous primers for DNA amplification Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Bacterial species: Haemophilus influenzae 154 5′-TTT AAC GAT CCT TTT ACT CCT TTT G 27 a 5074-5098 155 b 5′-ACT GCT GTT GTA AAG AGG TTA AAA T 27 a 5266-5290 Bacterial species: Streptococcus pneumoniae 78 5′-AGT AAA ATG AAA TAA GAA CAG GAC AG 34 164-189 79 b 5′-AAA ACA GGA TAG GAG AAC GGG AAA A 34 314-338 156 5′-ATT TGG TGA CGG GTG ACT TT 31 a 1401-1420 157 b 5′-GCT GAG GAT TTG TTC TTC TT 31 a 1515-1534 158 5′-GAG CGG TTT CTA TGA TTG TA 35 a 1342-13
- Annex II Specific and ubiquitous primers for DNA amplification Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Universal primers c 126 5′-GGA GGA AGG TGG GGA TGA CG — — 127 b 5′-ATG GTG TGA CGG GCG GTG TG — — a Sequences from data banks b These sequences are from the opposite DNA strand of the sequences given in the Sequence listing c Universal primers were derived from the 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence not included in the Sequence listing
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Communicable Diseases (AREA)
- Pulmonology (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Mycology (AREA)
- Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- Classical Identification of Bacteria
- Bacteria are classically identified by their ability to utilize different substrates as a source of carbon and nitrogen through the use of biochemical tests such as the API20E™ system. Susceptibility testing of Gram negative bacilli has progressed to microdilution tests. Although the API and the microdilution systems are cost-effective, at least two days are required to obtain preliminary results due to the necessity of two successive overnight incubations to isolate and identify the bacteria from the specimen. Some faster detection methods with sophisticated and expensive apparatus have been developed. For example, the fastest identification system, the autoSCAN-Walk-Away system™ identifies both Gram negative and Gram positive from isolated bacterial colonies in 2 hours and susceptibility patterns to antibiotics in only 7 hours. However, this system has an unacceptable margin of error, especially with bacterial species other than Enterobacteriaceae (York et al., 1992. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:2903-2910). Nevertheless, even this fastest method requires primary isolation of the bacteria as a pure culture, a process which takes at least 18 hours if there is a pure culture or 2 to 3 days if there is a mixed culture.
- Urine Specimens
- A large proportion (40-50%) of specimens received in routine diagnostic microbiology laboratories for bacterial identification are urine specimens (Pezzlo, 1988, Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1:268-280). Urinary tract infections (UTI) are extremely common and affect up to 20% of women and account for extensive morbidity and increased mortality among hospitalized patients (Johnson and Stamm, 1989; Ann. Intern. Med. 111:906-917). UTI are usually of bacterial etiology and require antimicrobial therapy. The Gram negative bacillus Escherichia coli is by far the most prevalent urinary pathogen and accounts for 50 to 60% of UTI (Pezzlo, 1988, op. cit.). The prevalence for bacterial pathogens isolated from urine specimens observed recently at the “Centre Hospitalier de 1'Université Laval (CHUL)” is given in Tables 1 and 2.
- Conventional pathogen identification in urine specimens. The search for pathogens in urine specimens is so preponderant in the routine microbiology laboratory that a myriad of tests have been developed. The gold standard is still the classical semi-quantitative plate culture method in which a calibrated loop of urine is streaked on plates and incubated for 18-24 hours. Colonies are then counted to determine the total number of colony forming units (CFU) per liter of urine. A bacterial UTI is normally associated with a bacterial count of ≧107 CFU/L in urine. However, infections with less than 107 CFU/L in urine are possible, particularly in patients with a high incidence of diseases or those catheterized (Stark and Maki, 1984, N. Engl. J. Med. 311:560-564). Importantly, close to 80% of urine specimens tested are considered negative (<107 CFU/L; Table 3).
- Accurate and rapid urine screening methods for bacterial pathogens would allow a faster identification of negative results and a more efficient clinical investigation of the patient. Several rapid identification methods (Uriscreen™, UTIscreen™, Flash Track™ DNA probes and others) were recently compared to slower standard biochemical methods which are based on culture of the bacterial pathogens. Although much faster, these rapid tests showed low sensitivities and specificities as well as a high number of false negative and false positive results (Koening et al., 1992. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:342-345; Pezzlo et al., 1992. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:640-684).
- Urine specimens found positive by culture are further characterized using standard biochemical tests to identify the bacterial pathogen and are also tested for susceptibility to antibiotics.
- Any Clinical Specimens
- As with urine specimen which was used here as an example, our probes and amplification primers are also applicable to any other clinical specimens. The DNA-based tests proposed in this invention are superior to standard methods currently used for routine diagnosis in terms of rapidity and accuracy. While a high percentage of urine specimens are negative, in many other clinical specimens more than 95% of cultures are negative (Table 4). These data further support the use of universal probes to screen out the negative clinical specimens. Clinical specimens from organisms other than humans (e.g. other primates, mammals, farm animals or live stocks) may also be used.
- Towards the Development of Rapid DNA-Based Diagnostic Tests
- A rapid diagnostic test should have a significant impact on the management of infections. For the identification of pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes in clinical samples, DNA probe and DNA amplification technologies offer several advantages over conventional methods. There is no need for subculturing, hence the organism can be detected directly in clinical samples thereby reducing the costs and time associated with isolation of pathogens. DNA-based technologies have proven to be extremely useful for specific applications in the clinical microbiology laboratory. For example, kits for the detection of fastidious organisms based on the use of hybridization probes or DNA amplification for the direct detection of pathogens in clinical specimens are commercially available (Persing et al, 1993. Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: Principles and Applications, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.).
- The present invention is an advantageous alternative to the conventional culture identification methods used in hospital clinical microbiology laboratories and in private clinics for routine diagnosis. Besides being much faster, DNA-based diagnostic tests are more accurate than standard biochemical tests presently used for diagnosis because the bacterial genotype (e.g. DNA level) is more stable than the bacterial phenotype (e.g. biochemical properties). The originality of this invention is that genomic DNA fragments (size of at least 100 base pairs) specific for 12 species of commonly encountered bacterial pathogens were selected from genomic libraries or from data banks. Amplification primers or oligonucleotide probes (both less than 100 nucleotides in length) which are both derived from the sequence of species-specific DNA fragments identified by hybridization from genomic libraries or from selected data bank sequences are used as a basis to develop diagnostic tests. Oligonucleotide primers and probes for the detection of commonly encountered and clinically important bacterial resistance genes are also included. For example, Annexes I and II present a list of suitable oligonucleotide probes and PCR primers which were all derived from the species-specific DNA fragments selected from genomic libraries or from data bank sequences. It is clear to the individual skilled in the art that oligonucleotide sequences appropriate for the specific detection of the above bacterial species other than those listed in Annexes 1 and 2 may be derived from the species-specific fragments or from the selected data bank sequences. For example, the oligonucleotides may be shorter or longer than the ones we have chosen and may be selected anywhere else in the identified species-specific sequences or selected data bank sequences. Alternatively, the oligonucleotides may be designed for use in amplification methods other than PCR. Consequently, the core of this invention is the identification of species-specific genomic DNA fragments from bacterial genomic DNA libraries and the selection of genomic DNA fragments from data bank sequences which are used as a source of species-specific and ubiquitous oligonucleotides. Although the selection of oligonucleotides suitable for diagnostic purposes from the sequence of the species-specific fragments or from the selected data bank sequences requires much effort it is quite possible for the individual skilled in the art to derive from our fragments or selected data bank sequences suitable oligonucleotides which are different from the ones we have selected and tested as examples (Annexes I and II).
- Others have developed DNA-based tests for the detection and identification of some of the bacterial pathogens for which we have identified species-specific sequences (PCT patent application Serial No. WO 93/03186). However, their strategy was based on the amplification of the highly conserved 16S rRNA gene followed by hybridization with internal species-specific oligonucleotides. The strategy from this invention is much simpler and more rapid because it allows the direct amplification of species-specific targets using oligonucleotides derived from the species-specific bacterial genomic DNA fragments.
- Since a high percentage of clinical specimens are negative, oligonucleotide primers and probes were selected from the highly conserved 16S or 23S rRNA genes to detect all bacterial pathogens possibly encountered in clinical specimens in order to determine whether a clinical specimen is infected or not. This strategy allows rapid screening out of the numerous negative clinical specimens submitted for bacteriological testing.
- We are also developing other DNA-based tests, to be performed simultaneously with bacterial identification, to determine rapidly the putative bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics by targeting commonly encountered and clinically relevant bacterial resistance genes. Although the sequences from the selected antibiotic resistance genes are available and have been used to develop DNA-based tests for their detection (Ehrlich and Greenberg, 1994. PCR-based Diagnostics in Infectious Diseases, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston, Mass.; Persing et al, 1993. Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: Principles and Applications, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.), our approch is innovative as it represents major improvements over current “gold standard” diagnostic methods based on culture of the bacteria because it allows the rapid identification of the presence of a specific bacterial pathogen and evaluation of its susceptibility to antibiotics directly from the clinical specimens within one hour.
- We believe that the rapid and simple diagnostic tests not based on cultivation of the bacteria that we are developing will gradually replace the slow conventional bacterial identification methods presently used in hospital clinical microbiology laboratories and in private clinics. In our opinion, these rapid DNA-based diagnostic tests for severe and common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance will (i) save lives by optimizing treatment, (ii) diminish antibiotic resistance by reducing the use of broad spectrum antibiotics and (iii) decrease overall health costs by preventing or shortening hospitalizations.
- In accordance with the present invention, there is provided sequence from genomic DNA fragments (size of at least 100 base pairs and all described in the sequence listing) selected either by hybridization from genomic libraries or from data banks and which are specific for the detection of commonly encountered bacterial pathogens (i.e. Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis) in clinical specimens. These bacterial species are associated with approximately 90% of urinary tract infections and with a high percentage of other severe infections including septicemia, meningitis, pneumonia, intraabdominal infections, skin infections and many other severe respiratory tract infections. Overall, the above bacterial species may account for up to 80% of bacterial pathogens isolated in routine microbiology laboratories.
- Synthetic oligonucleotides for hybridization (probes) or DNA amplification (primers) were derived from the above species-specific DNA fragments (ranging in sizes from 0.25 to 5.0 kilobase pairs (kbp)) or from selected data bank sequences (GenBank and EMBL). Bacterial species for which some of the oligonucleotide probes and amplification primers were derived from selected data bank sequences are Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus pyogenes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The person skilled in the art understands that the important innovation in this invention is the identification of the species-specific DNA fragments selected either from bacterial genomic libraries by hybridization or from data bank sequences. The selection of oligonucleotides from these fragments suitable for diagnostic purposes is also innovative. Specific and ubiquitous oligonucleotides different from the ones tested in the practice are considered as embodiments of the present invention.
- The development of hybridization (with either fragment or oligonucleotide probes) or of DNA amplification protocols for the detection of pathogens from clinical specimens renders possible a very rapid bacterial identification. This will greatly reduce the time currently required for the identification of pathogens in the clinical laboratory since these technologies can be applied for bacterial detection and identification directly from clinical specimens with minimum pretreatment of any biological specimens to release bacterial DNA. In addition to being 100% specific, probes and amplification primers allow identification of the bacterial species directly from clinical specimens or, alternatively, from an isolated colony. DNA amplification assays have the added advantages of being faster and more sensitive than hybridization assays, since they allow rapid and exponential in vitro replication of the target segment of DNA from the bacterial genome. Universal probes and amplification primers selected from the 16S or 23S rRNA genes highly conserved among bacteria, which permit the detection of any bacterial pathogens, will serve as a procedure to screen out the numerous negative clinical specimens received in diagnostic laboratories. The use of oligonucleotide probes or primers complementary to characterized bacterial genes encoding resistance to antibiotics to identify commonly encountered and clinically important resistance genes is also under the scope of this invention.
- Development of Species-Specific DNA Probes
- DNA fragment probes were developed for the following bacterial species: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis. (For Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus pyogenes, oligonucleotide sequences were exclusively derived from selected data bank sequences). These species-specific fragments were selected from bacterial genomic libraries by hybridization to DNA from a variety of Gram positive and Gram negative bacterial species (Table 5).
- The chromosomal DNA from each bacterial species for which probes were seeked was isolated using standard methods. DNA was digested with a frequently cutting restriction enzyme such as Sau3AI and then ligated into the bacterial plasmid vector pGEM3Zf (Promega) linearized by appropriate restriction endonuclease digestion. Recombinant plasmids were then used to transform competent E. coli strain DH5α thereby yielding a genomic library. The plasmid content of the transformed bacterial cells was analyzed using standard methods. DNA fragments of target bacteria ranging in size from 0.25 to 5.0 kilobase pairs (kbp) were cut out from the vector by digestion of the recombinant plasmid with various restriction endonucleases. The insert was separated from the vector by agarose gel electrophoresis and purified in low melting point agarose gels. Each of the purified fragments of bacterial genomic DNA was then used as a probe for specificity tests.
- For each given species, the gel-purified restriction fragments of unknown coding potential were labeled with the radioactive nucleotide α-32P(dATP) which was incorporated into the DNA fragment by the random priming labeling reaction. Non-radioactive modified nucleotides could also be incorporated into the DNA by this method to serve as a label.
- Each DNA fragment probe (i.e. a segment of bacterial genomic DNA of at least 100 bp in length cut out from clones randomly selected from the genomic library) was then tested for its specificity by hybridization to DNAs from a variety of bacterial species (Table 5). The double-stranded labeled DNA probe was heat-denatured to yield labeled single-stranded DNA which could then hybridize to any single-stranded target DNA fixed onto a solid support or in solution. The target DNAs consisted of total cellular DNA from an array of bacterial species found in clinical samples (Table 5). Each target DNA was released from the bacterial cells and denatured by conventional methods and then irreversibly fixed onto a solid support (e.g. nylon or nitrocellulose membranes) or free in solution. The fixed single-stranded target DNAs were then hybridized with the single-stranded probe. Pre-hybridization, hybridization and post-hybridization conditions were as follows: (i) Pre-hybridization; in 1 M NaCl+10% dextran sulfate+1% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate)+1 μg/ml salmon sperm DNA at 650° C. for 15 min. (ii) Hybridization; in fresh pre-hybridization solution containing the labeled probe at 650° C. overnight. (iii) Post-hybridization; washes twice in 3×SSC containing 1% SDS (1×SSC is 0.15M NaCl, 0.015M NaCitrate) and twice in 0.1×SSC containing 0.1% SDS; all washes were at 650° C. for 15 min. Autoradiography of washed filters allowed the detection of selectively hybridized probes. Hybridization of the probe to a specific target DNA indicated a high degree of similarity between the nucleotide sequence of these two DNAs. Species-specific DNA fragments selected from various bacterial genomic libraries ranging in size from 0.25 to 5.0 kbp were isolated for 10 common bacterial pathogens (Table 6) based on hybridization to chromosomal DNAs from a variety of bacteria performed as described above. All of the bacterial species tested (66 species listed in Table 5) were likely to be pathogens associated with common infections or potential contaminants which can be isolated from clinical specimens. A DNA fragment probe was considered specific only when it hybridized solely to the pathogen from which it was isolated. DNA fragment probes found to be specific were subsequently tested for their ubiquity (i.e. ubiquitous probes recognized most isolates of the target species) by hybridization to bacterial DNAs from approximately 10 to 80 clinical isolates of the species of interest (Table 6). The DNAs were denatured, fixed onto nylon membranes and hybridized as described above.
- Sequencing of the Species-Specific Fragment Orobes
- The nucleotide sequence of the totality or of a portion of the species-specific DNA fragments isolated (Table 6) was determined using the dideoxynucleotide termination sequencing method which was performed using Sequenase (USB Biochemicals) or T7 DNA polymerase (Pharmacia). These nucleotide sequences are shown in the sequence listing. Alternatively, sequences selected from data banks (GenBank and EMBL) were used as sources of oligonucleotides for diagnostic purposes for Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus pyogenes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. For this strategy, an array of suitable oligonucleotide primers or probes derived from a variety of genomic DNA fragments (size of more than 100 bp) selected from data banks was tested for their specificity and ubiquity in PCR and hybridization assays as described later. It is important to note that the data bank sequences were selected based on their potential of being species-specific according to available sequence information. Only data bank sequences from which species-specific oligonucleotides could be derived are included in this invention.
- Oligonucleotide probes and amplification primers derived from species-specific fragments selected from the genomic libraries or from data bank sequences were synthesized using an automated DNA synthesizer (Millipore). Prior to synthesis, all oligonucleotides (probes for hybridization and primers for DNA amplification) were evaluated for their suitability for hybridization or DNA amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) by computer analysis using standard programs (e.g. Genetics Computer Group (GCG) and Oligo™ 4.0 (National Biosciences)). The potential suitability of the PCR primer pairs was also evaluated prior to the synthesis by verifying the absence of unwanted features such as long stretches of one nucleotide, a high proportion of G or C residues at the 3′ end and a 3′-terminal T residue (Persing et al, 1993. Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: Principles and Applications, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.).
- Hybridization with Oligonucleotide Probes
- In hybridization experiments, oligonucleotides (size less than 100 nucleotides) have some advantages over DNA fragment probes for the detection of bacteria such as ease of preparation in large quantities, consistency in results from batch to batch and chemical stability. Briefly, for the hybridizations, oligonucleotides were 5′ end-labeled with the radionucleotide γ32P(ATP) using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Pharmacia). The unincorporated radionucleotide was removed by passing the labeled single-stranded oligonucleotide through a Sephadex G50 column. Alternatively, oligonucleotides were labeled with biotin, either enzymatically at their 3′ ends or incorporated directly during synthesis at their 5′ ends, or with digoxigenin. It will be appreciated by the person skilled in the art that labeling means other than the three above labels may be used.
- The target DNA was denatured, fixed onto a solid support and hybridized as previously described for the DNA fragment probes. Conditions for pre-hybridization and hybridization were as described earlier. Post-hybridization washing conditions were as follows: twice in 3×SSC containing 1% SDS, twice in 2×SSC containing 1% SDS and twice in 1×SSC containing 1% SDS (all of these washes were at 65° C. for 15 min ), and a final wash in 0.1×SSC containing 1% SDS at 25° C. for 15 min. For probes labeled with radioactive labels the detection of hybrids was by autoradiography as described earlier. For non-radioactive labels detection may be calorimetric or by chemiluminescence.
- The oligonucleotide probes may be derived from either strand of the duplex DNA. The probes may consist of the bases A, G, C, or T or analogs. The probes may be of any suitable length and may be selected anywhere within the species-specific genomic DNA fragments selected from the genomic libraries or from data bank sequences.
- DNA Amplification
- For DNA amplification by the widely used PCR (polymerase chain reaction) method, primer pairs were derived either from the sequenced species-specific DNA fragments or from data bank sequences or, alternatively, were shortened versions of oligonucleotide probes. Prior to synthesis, the potential primer pairs were analyzed by using the program oligo™ 4.0 (National Biosciences) to verify that they are likely candidates for PCR amplifications.
- During DNA amplification by PCR, two oligonucleotide primers binding respectively to each strand of the denatured double-stranded target DNA from the bacterial genome are used to amplify exponentially in vitro the target DNA by successive thermal cycles allowing denaturation of the DNA, annealing of the primers and synthesis of new targets at each cycle (Persing et al, 1993. Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: Principles and Applications, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.). Briefly, the PCR protocols were as follows. Clinical specimens or bacterial colonies were added directly to the 50 μL PCR reaction mixtures containing 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.4 μM of each of the two primers, 200 μM of each of the four dNTPs and 1.25 Units of Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin Elmer). PCR reactions were then subjected to thermal cycling (3 min at 95° C. followed by 30 cycles of 1 second at 95° C. and 1 second at 55° C.) using a Perkin Elmer 480™ thermal cycler and subsequently analyzed by standard ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel electrophoresis. It is clear that other methods for the detection of specific amplification products, which may be faster and more practical for routine diagnosis, may be used. Such methods may be based on the detection of fluorescence after amplification (e.g. TaqMan™ system from Perkin Elmer or Amplisensor™ from Biotronics) or liquid hybridization with an oligonucleotide probe binding to internal sequences of the specific amplification product. These novel probes can be generated from our species-specific fragment probes. Methods based on the detection of fluorescence are particularly promising for utilization in routine diagnosis as they are, very rapid and quantitative and can be automated.
- To assure PCR efficiency, glycerol or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or other related solvents, can be used to increase the sensitivity of the PCR and to overcome problems associated with the amplification of target with a high GC content or with strong secondary structures. The concentration ranges for glycerol and DMSO are 5-15% (v/v) and 3-10% (v\v), respectively. For the PCR reaction mixture, the concentration ranges for the amplification primers and the MgCl2 are 0.1-1.0 μM and 1.5-3.5 mM, respectively. Modifications of the standard PCR protocol using external and nested primers (i.e. nested PCR) or using more than one primer pair (i.e. multiplex PCR) may also be used (Persing et al, 1993. Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: Principles and Applications, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.). For more details about the PCR protocols and amplicon detection methods see examples 7 and 8.
- The person skilled in the art of DNA amplification knows the existence of other rapid amplification procedures such as ligase chain reaction (LCR), transcription-based amplification systems (TAS), self-sustained sequence replication (3SR), nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA), strand displacement amplification (SDA) and branched DNA (bDNA) (Persing et al, 1993. Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: Principles and Applications, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.). The scope of this invention is not limited to the use of amplification by PCR, but rather includes the use of any rapid nucleic acid amplification methods or any other procedures which may be used to increase rapidity and sensitivity of the tests. Any oligonucleotides suitable for the amplification of nucleic acid by approaches other than PCR and derived from the species-specific fragments and from selected antibiotic resistance gene sequences included in this document are also under the scope of this invention.
- Specificity and Ubiquity Tests for Oligonucleotide Probes and Primers
- The specificity of oligonucleotide probes, derived either from the sequenced species-specific fragments or from data bank sequences, was tested by hybridization to DNAs from the array of bacterial species listed in Table 5 as previously described. Oligonucleotides found to be specific were subsequently tested for their ubiquity by hybridization to bacterial DNAs from approximately 80 isolates of the target species as described for fragment probes. Probes were considered ubiquitous when they hybridized specifically with the DNA from at least 80% of the isolates. Results for specificity and ubiquity tests with the oligonucleotide probes are summarized in Table 6. The specificity and ubiquity of the amplification primer pairs were tested directly from cultures (see example 7) of the same bacterial strains. For specificity and ubiquity tests, PCR assays were performed directly from bacterial colonies of approximately 80 isolates of the target species. Results are summarized in Table 7. All specific and ubiquitous oligonucleotide probes and amplification primers for each of the 12 bacterial species investigated are listed in Annexes I and II, respectively. Divergence in the sequenced DNA fragments can occur and, insofar as the divergence of these sequences or a part thereof does not affect the specificity of the probes or amplification primers, variant bacterial DNA is under the scope of this invention.
- Universal Bacterial Detection
- In the routine microbiology laboratory a high percentage of clinical specimens sent for bacterial identification is negative (Table 4). For example, over a 2 year period, around 80% of urine specimens received by the laboratory at the “Centre Hospitalier de 1' Université Laval (CHUL)” were negative (i.e. <107 CFU/L) (Table 3). Testing clinical samples with universal probes or universal amplification primers to detect the presence of bacteria prior to specific identification and screen out the numerous negative specimens is thus useful as it saves costs and may rapidly orient the clinical management of the patients. Several oligonucleotides and amplification primers were therefore synthesized from highly conserved portions of bacterial 16S or 23S ribosomal RNA gene sequences available in data banks (Annexes III and IV). In hybridization tests, a pool of seven oligonucleotides (Annex I; Table 6) hybridized strongly to DNA from all bacterial species listed in Table 5. This pool of universal probes labeled with radionucleotides or with any other modified nucleotides is consequently very useful for detection of bacteria in urine samples with a sensitivity range of ≧107 CFU/L. These probes can also be applied for bacterial detection in other clinical samples.
- Amplification primers also derived from the sequence of highly conserved ribosomal RNA genes were used as an alternative strategy for universal bacterial detection directly from clinical specimens (Annex IV; Table 7). The DNA amplification strategy was developed to increase the sensitivity and the rapidity of the test. This amplification test was ubiquitous since it specifically amplified DNA from 23 different bacterial species encountered in clinical specimens.
- Well-conserved bacterial genes other than ribosomal RNA genes could also be good candidates for universal bacterial detection directly from clinical specimens. Such genes may be associated with processes essential for bacterial survival (e.g. protein synthesis, DNA synthesis, cell division or DNA repair) and could therefore be highly conserved during evolution. We are working on these candidate genes to develop new rapid tests for the universal detection of bacteria directly from clinical specimens.
- Antibiotic Resistance Genes
- Antimicrobial resistance complicates treatment and often leads to therapeutic failures. Furthermore, overuse of antibiotics inevitably leads to the emergence of bacterial resistance. Our goal is to provide the clinicians, within one hour, the needed information to prescribe optimal treatments. Besides the rapid identification of negative clinical specimens with DNA-based tests for universal bacterial detection and the identification of the presence of a specific pathogen in the positive specimens with DNA-based tests for specific bacterial detection, the clinicians also need timely information about the ability of the bacterial pathogen to resist antibiotic treatments. We feel that the most efficient strategy to evaluate rapidly bacterial resistance to antimicrobials is to detect directly from the clinical specimens the most common and important antibiotic resistance genes (i.e. DNA-based tests for the detection of antibiotic resitance genes). Since the sequence from the most important and common bacterial antibiotic resistance genes are available from data banks, our strategy is to use the sequence from a portion or from the entire gene to design specific oligonucleotides which will be used as a basis for the development of rapid DNA-based tests. The sequence from the bacterial antibiotic resistance genes selected on the basis of their clinical relevance (i.e. high incidence and importance) is given in the sequence listing. Table 8 summarizes some characteristics of the selected antibiotic resistance genes.
- The following examples are intended to be illustrative of the various methods and compounds of the invention.
- Isolation and cloning of fragments. Genomic DNAs from Escherichia coli strain ATCC 25922, Klebsiella pneumoniae strain CK2, Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain ATCC 27853, Proteus mirabilis strain ATCC 35657, Streptococcus pneumoniae strain ATCC 27336, Staphylococcus aureus strain ATCC 25923, Staphylococcus epidermidis strain ATCC 12228, Staphylococcus saprophyticus strain ATCC 15305, Haemophilus influenzae reference strain Rd and Moraxella catarrhalis strain ATCC 53879 were prepared using standard procedures. It is understood that the bacterial genomic DNA may have been isolated from strains other than the ones mentioned above. (For Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus pyogenes oligonucleotide sequences were derived exclusively from data banks). Each DNA was digested with a restriction enzyme which frequently cuts DNA such as Sau3AI. The resulting DNA fragments were ligated into a plasmid vector (pGEM3Zf) to create recombinant plasmids and transformed into competent E. coli cells (DH5α). It is understood that the vectors and corresponding competent cells should not be limited to the ones herein above specifically examplified. The objective of obtaining recombinant plasmids and transformed cells is to provide an easily reproducible source of DNA fragments useful as probes. Therefore, insofar as the inserted fragments are specific and selective for the target bacterial DNA, any recombinant plasmids and corresponding transformed host cells are under the scope of this invention. The plasmid content of the transformed bacterial cells was analyzed using standard methods. DNA fragments from target bacteria ranging in size from 0.25 to 5.0 kbp were cut out from the vector by digestion of the recombinant plasmid with various restriction endonucleases. The insert was separated from the vector by agarose gel electrophoresis and purified in a low melting point agarose gel. Each of the purified fragments was then used for specificity tests.
- Labeling of DNA fragment probes. The label used was α32P(dATP), a radioactive nucleotide which can be incorporated enzymatically into a double-stranded DNA molecule. The fragment of interest is first denatured by heating at 95° C. for 5 min, then a mixture of random primers is allowed to anneal to the strands of the fragments. These primers, once annealed, provide a starting point for synthesis of DNA. DNA polymerase, usually the Klenow fragment, is provided along with the four nucleotides, one of which is radioactive. When the reaction is terminated, the mixture of new DNA molecules is once again denatured to provide radioactive single-stranded DNA molecules (i.e. the probe). As mentioned earlier, other modified nucleotides may be used to label the probes.
- Specificity and ubiquity tests for the DNA fragment probes. Species-specific DNA fragments ranging in size from 0.25 to 5.0 kbp were isolated for 10 common bacterial pathogens (Table 6) based on hybridization to chromosomal DNAs from a variety of bacteria. Samples of whole cell DNA for each bacterial strain listed in Table 5 were transferred onto a nylon membrane using a dot blot apparatus, washed and denatured before being irreversibly fixed. Hybridization conditions were as described earlier. A DNA fragment probe was considered specific only when it hybridized solely to the pathogen from which it was isolated. Labeled DNA fragments hybridizing specifically only to target bacterial species (i.e. specific) were then tested for their ubiquity by hybridization to DNAs from approximately 10 to 80 isolates of the species of interest as described earlier. The conditions for pre-hybridization, hybridization and post-hybridization washes were as described earlier. After autoradiography (or other detection means appropriate for the non-radioactive label used), the specificity of each individual probe can be determined. Each probe found to be specific (i.e. hybridizing only to the DNA from the bacterial species from which it was isolated) and ubiquitous (i.e. hybridizing to most isolates of the target species) was kept for further experimentations.
- Same as example 1 except that testing of the strains is by colony hybridization. The bacterial strains were inoculated onto a nylon membrane placed on nutrient agar. The membranes were incubated at 37° C. for two hours and then bacterial lysis and DNA denaturation were carried out according to standard procedures. DNA hybridization was performed as described earlier.
- Same as example 1 except that bacteria were detected directly from clinical samples. Any biological samples were loaded directly onto a dot blot apparatus and cells were lysed in situ for bacterial detection. Blood samples should be heparizined in order to avoid coagulation interfering with their convenient loading on a dot blot apparatus.
- Nucleotide sequencina of DNA fragments. The nucleotide sequence of the totality or a portion of each fragment found to be specific and ubiquitous (Example 1) was determined using the dideoxynucleotide termination sequencing method (Sanger et al., 1977, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 74:5463-5467). These DNA sequences are shown in the sequence listing. Oligonucleotide probes and amplification primers were selected from these nucleotide sequences, or alternatively, from selected data banks sequences and were then synthesized on an automated Biosearch synthesizer (Millipore™) using phosphoramidite chemistry.
- Labeling of oliaonucleotides. Each oligonucleotide was 5′ end-labeled with γ32P-ATP by the T4 polynucleotide kinase (Pharmacia) as described earlier. The label could also be non-radioactive.
- Specificity test for oligonucleotide probes. All labeled oligonucleotide probes were tested for their specificity by hybridization to DNAs from a variety of Gram positive and Gram negative bacterial species as described earlier. Species-specific probes were those hybridizing only to DNA from the bacterial species from which it was isolated. Oligonucleotide probes found to be specific were submitted to ubiquity tests as follows.
- Ubiquity test for oligonucleotide probes. Specific oligonucleotide probes were then used in ubiquity tests with approximately 80 strains of the target species. Chromosomal DNAs from the isolates were transferred onto nylon membranes and hybridized with labeled oligonucleotide probes as described for specificity tests. The batteries of approximately 80 isolates constructed for each target species contain reference ATCC strains as well as a variety of clinical isolates obtained from various sources. Ubiquitous probes were those hybridizing to at least 80% of DNAs from the battery of clinical isolates of the target species. Examples of specific and ubiquitous oligonucleotide probes are listed in Annex 1.
- Same as example 4 except that a pool of specific oligonucleotide probes is used for bacterial identification (i) to increase sensitivity and assure 100% ubiquity or (ii) to identify simultaneously more than one bacterial species. Bacterial identification could be done from isolated colonies or directly from clinical specimens.
- PCR amplification. The technique of PCR was used to increase sensitivity and rapidity of the tests. The PCR primers used were often shorter derivatives of the extensive sets of oligonucleotides previously developed for hybridization assays (Table 6). The sets of primers were tested in PCR assays performed directly from a bacterial colony or from a bacterial suspension (see Example 7) to determine their specificity and ubiquity (Table 7). Examples of specific and ubiquitous PCR primer pairs are listed in annex II.
- Specificity and ubiquity tests for amplification primers. The specificity of all selected PCR primer pairs was tested against the battery of Gram negative and Gram positive bacteria used to test the oligonucleotide probes (Table 5). Primer pairs found specific for each species were then tested for their ubiquity to ensure that each set of primers could amplify at least 80% of DNAs from a battery of approximately 80 isolates of the target species. The batteries of isolates constructed for each species contain reference ATCC strains and various clinical isolates representative of the clinical diversity for each species.
- Standard precautions to avoid false positive PCR results should be taken. Methods to inactivate PCR amplification products such as the inactivation by uracil-N-glycosylase may be used to control PCR carryover.
- Amplification directly from a bacterial colony or suspension. PCR assays were performed either directly from a bacterial colony or from a bacterial suspension, the latter being adjusted to a standard McFarland 0.5 (corresponds to 1.5 ×108 bacteria/mL). In the case of direct amplification from a colony, a portion of the colony was transferred directly to a 50 μL PCR reaction mixture (containing 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris pH 8.3, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.4 μM of each of the two primers, 200 μM of each of the four dNTPs and 1.25 Unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin Elmer)) using a plastic rod. For the bacterial suspension, 4 μL of the cell suspension was added to 46 μL of the same PCR reaction mixture. For both strategies, the reaction mixture was overlaid with 50 μL of mineral oil and PCR amplifications were carried out using an initial denaturation step of 3 min. at 95° C. followed by 30 cycles consisting of a 1 second denaturation step at 95° C. and of a 1 second annealing step at 55° C. in a Perkin Elmer 480™ thermal cycler. PCR amplification products were then analyzed by standard agarose gel (2%) electrophoresis. Amplification products were visualized in agarose gels containing 2.5 μg/mL of ethidium bromide under UV at 254 nm. The entire PCR assay can be completed in approximately one hour.
- Alternatively, amplification from bacterial cultures was performed as described above but using a “hot start” protocol. In that case, an initial reaction mixture containing the target DNA, primers and dNTPs was heated at 85° C. prior to the addition of the other components of the PCR reaction mixture. The final concentration of all reagents was as described above. Subsequently, the PCR reactions were submitted to thermal cycling and analysis as described above.
- Amplification directly from clinical specimens. For amplification from urine specimens, 4 μL of undiluted or diluted (1:10) urine was added directly to 46 μL of the above PCR reaction mixture and amplified as described earlier.
- To improve bacterial cell lysis and eliminate the PCR inhibitory effects of clinical specimens, samples were routinely diluted in lysis buffer containing detergent(s). Subsequently, the lysate was added directly to the PCR reaction mixture. Heat treatments of the lysates, prior to DNA amplification, using the thermocycler or a microwave oven could also be performed to increase the efficiency of cell lysis.
- Our strategy is to develop rapid and simple protocols to eliminate PCR inhibitory effects of clinical specimens and lyse bacterial cells to perform DNA amplification directly from a variety of biological samples. PCR has the advantage of being compatible with crude DNA preparations. For example, blood, cerebrospinal fluid and sera may be used directly in PCR assays after a brief heat treatment. We intend to use such rapid and simple strategies to develop fast protocols for DNA amplification from a variety of clinical specimens.
- Detection of antibiotic resistance genes. The presence of specific antibiotic resistance genes which are frequently encountered and clinically relevant is identified using the PCR amplification or hybridization protocols described in previous sections. Specific oligonucleotides used as a basis for the DNA-based tests are selected from the antibiotic resistance gene sequences. These tests can be performed either directly from clinical specimens or from a bacterial colony and should complement diagnostic tests for specific bacterial identification.
- Same as examples 7 and 8 except that assays were performed by multiplex PCR (i.e. using several pairs of primers in a single PCR reaction) to (i) reach an ubiquity of 100% for the specific target pathogen or (ii) to detect simultaneously several species of bacterial pathogens.
- For example, the detection of Escherichia coli requires three pairs of PCR primers to assure a ubiquity of 100%. Therefore, a multiplex PCR assay (using the “hot-start” protocol (Example 7)) with those three primer pairs was developed. This strategy was also used for the other bacterial pathogens for which more than one primer pair was required to reach an ubiquity of 100%.
- Multiplex PCR assays could also be used to (i) detect simultaneously several bacterial species or, alternatively, (ii) to simultaneously identify the bacterial pathogen and detect specific antibiotic resistance genes either directly from a clinical specimen or from a bacterial colony.
- For these applications, amplicon detection methods should be adapted to differentiate the various amplicons produced. Standard agarose gel electrophoresis could be used because it discriminates the amplicons based on their sizes. Another useful strategy for this purpose would be detection using a variety of fluorochromes emitting at different wavelengths which are each coupled with a specific oligonucleotide linked to a fluorescence quencher which is degraded during amplification to release the fluorochrome (e.g. TaqMan™, Perkin Elmer).
- Detection of amplification Products. The person skilled in the art will appreciate that alternatives other than standard agarose gel electrophoresis (Example 7) may be used for the revelation of amplification products. Such methods may be based on the detection of fluorescence after amplification (e.g. Amplisensor™, Biotronics; TaqMan™) or other labels such as biotin (SHARP Signal™ system, Digene Diagnostics). These methods are quantitative and easily automated. One of the amplification primers or an internal oligonucleotide probe specific to the amplicon(s) derived from the species-specific fragment probes is coupled with the fluorochrome or with any other label. Methods based on the detection of fluorescence are particularly suitable for diagnostic tests since they are rapid and flexible as fluorochromes emitting different wavelengths are available (Perkin Elmer).
- Species-specific, universal and antibiotic resistance gene amplification primers can be used in other rapid amplification procedures such as the ligase chain reaction (LCR), transcription-based amplification systems (TAS), self-sustained sequence replication (3SR), nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA), strand displacement amplification (SDA) and branched DNA (bDNA) or any other methods to increase the sensitivity of the test. Amplifications can be performed from an isolated bacterial colony or directly from clinical specimens. The scope of this invention is therefore not limited to the use of PCR but rather includes the use of any procedures to specifically identify bacterial DNA and which may be used to increase rapidity and sensitivity of the tests.
- A test kit would contain sets of probes specific for each bacterium as well as a set of universal probes. The kit is provided in the form of test components, consisting of the set of universal probes labeled with non-radioactive labels as well as labeled specific probes for the detection of each bacterium of interest in specific clinical samples. The kit will also include test reagents necessary to perform the pre-hybridization, hybridization, washing steps and hybrid detection. Finally, test components for the detection of known antibiotic resistance genes (or derivatives therefrom) will be included. Of course, the kit will include standard samples to be used as negative and positive controls for each hybridization test.
- Components to be included in the kits will be adapted to each specimen type and to detect pathogens commonly encountered in that type of specimen. Reagents for the universal detection of bacteria will also be included. Based on the sites of infection, the following kits for the specific detection of pathogens may be developed:
-
- A kit for the universal detection of bacterial pathogens from most clinical specimens which contains sets of probes specific for highly conserved regions of the bacterial genomes.
- A kit for the detection of bacterial pathogens retrieved from urine samples, which contains eight specific test components (sets of probes for the detection of Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis).
- A kit for the detection of respiratory pathogens which contains seven specific test components (sets of probes for detecting Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Haemophilus influenzae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus aureus).
- A kit for the detection of pathogens retrieved from blood samples, which contains eleven specific test components (sets of probes for the detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Haemophilus influenzae, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus epidermidis).
- A kit for the detection of pathogens causing meningitis, which contains four specific test components (sets of probes for the detection of Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa).
- A kit for the detection of clinically important antibiotic resistance genes which contains sets of probes for the specific detection of at least one of the 19 following genes associated with bacterial resistance : blatem, blarob, blashv, aadB, aacC1, aacC2, aacC3, aacA4, mecA, vanA, vanH, vanX, satA, aacA-aphD, vat, vga, msrA, sul and int.
- Other kits adapted for the detection of pathogens from skin, abdominal wound or any other clinically relevant kits will be developed.
- Same as example 13 except that the test kits contain all reagents and controls to perform DNA amplification assays. Diagnostic kits will be adapted for amplification by PCR (or other amplification methods) performed directly either from clinical specimens or from a bacterial colony. Components required for universal bacterial detection, bacterial identification and antibiotic resistance genes detection will be included.
- Amplification assays could be performed either in tubes or in microtitration plates having multiple wells. For assays in plates, the wells will be coated with the specific amplification primers and control DNAs and the detection of amplification products will be automated. Reagents and amplification primers for universal bacterial detection will be included in kits for tests performed directly from clinical specimens. Components required for bacterial identification and antibiotic resistance gene detection will be included in kits for testing directly from colonies as well as in kits for testing directly from clinical specimens.
- The kits will be adapted for use with each type of specimen as described in example 13 for hybridization-based diagnostic kits.
- It is understood that the use of the probes and amplification primers described in this invention for bacterial detection and identification is not limited to clinical microbiology applications. In fact, we feel that other sectors could also benefit from these new technologies. For example, these tests could be used by industries for quality control of food, water, pharmaceutical products or other products requiring microbiological control. These tests could also be applied to detect and identify bacteria in biological samples from organisms other than humans (e.g. other primates, mammals, farm animals and live stocks). These diagnostic tools could also be very useful for research purposes including clinical trials and epidemiological studies.
TABLE 1 Distribution of urinary isolates from positive urine samples (≧107 CFU/L) at the Centre Hospitalier de l′Université Laval (CHUL) for the 1992-1994 period. % of isolates Nov 92 April 93 July 93 Jan 94 Organisms n = 267a n = 265 n = 238 n = 281 Escherichia coli 53.2 51.7 53.8 54.1 Enterococcus faecalis 13.8 12.4 11.7 11.4 Klebsiella pneumoniae 6.4 6.4 5.5 5.3 Staphylococcus epidermidis 7.1 7.9 3.0 6.4 Proteus mirabilis 2.6 3.4 3.8 2.5 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 3.7 3.0 5.0 2.9 Staphylococcus saprophyticus 3.0 1.9 5.4 1.4 Othersb 10.2 13.3 11.8 16.0
an = total number of isolates for the indicated month.
bSee table 2.
-
TABLE 2 Distribution of uncommona urinary isolates from positive urine samples ( ≧107 CFU/L) at the Centre Hospitalier de I′Université Laval (CHUL) for the 1992-1994 period. % of isolates Organismsa Nov 92 April 93 July 93 Jan 94 Staphylococcus aureus 0.4 1.1 1.3 1.4 Staphylococcus spp. 2.2 4.9 1.7 6.0 Micrococcus spp. 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.7 Enterococcus faecium 0.4 0.4 1.3 1.4 Citrobacter spp. 1.4 0.8 0.4 0.7 Enterobacter spp. 1.5 1.1 1.3 1.4 Klebsiella oxytoca 1.1 1.5 2.5 1.8 Serratia spp. 0.8 0.0 0.5 0.0 Proteus spp. 0.4 0.4 0.0 1.1 Morganella and Providencia 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.0 Hafnia alvei 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 NFBb (Stenotrophomonas, 0.0 0.4 1.3 1.1 Acinetobacter) Candida spp. 0.8 1.9 0.7 0.4
aUncommon urinary isolates are those identified as “Others” in Table 1.
bNFB: non fermentative bacilli.
-
TABLE 3 Distribution of positivea (bacterial count ≧107 CFU/L) and negative (bacterial count <107 CFU/L) urine specimens tested at the Centre Hospitalier de l′Université Laval (CHUL) for the 1992-1994 period. Number of isolates (%) Specimens Nov 92 April 93 July 93 Jan 94 received: 1383(100) 1338(100) 1139(100) 1345(100) positive: 267(19.3) 265(19.8) 238(20.9) 281(20.9) negative: 1116(80.7) 1073(80.2) 901(79.1) 1064(79.1)
aBased on standard diagnostic methods, the minimal number of bacterial pathogens in urine samples to indicate an urinary tract infection is normally 107 CFU/L.
-
TABLE 4 Distribution of positive and negative clinical specimens tested in the Microbiology Laboratory of the CHUL. No. of % of % of Clinical samples positive negative specimensa tested specimens specimens Urine 17,981 19.4 80.6 Haemoculture/marrow 10,010 6.9 93.1 Sputum 1,266 68.4 31.6 Superficial pus 1,136 72.3 27.7 Cerebrospinal fluid 553 1.0 99.0 Synovial fluid-articular 523 2.7 97.3 Bronch./Trach./Amyg./Throat 502 56.6 43.4 Deep pus 473 56.8 43.2 Ears 289 47.1 52.9 Pleural and pericardial fluid 132 1.0 99.0 Peritonial fluid 101 28.6 71.4
aSpecimens tested from February 1994 to January 1995.
-
TABLE 5 Bacterial species (66) used for testing the specificity of DNA fragment probes, oligonucleotide probes and PCR primers. Number of Number of Bacterial species strains Bacterial species strains Gram negative: tested Gram positive: tested Proteus mirabilis 5 Streptococcus pneumoniae 7 Klebsiella pneumoniae 5 Streptococcus salivarius 2 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 5 Streptococcus viridans 2 Escherichia coli 5 Streptococcus pyogenes 2 Moraxella catarrhalis 5 Staphylococcus aureus 2 Proteus vulgaris 2 Staphylococcus epidermidis 2 Morganella morganii 2 Staphylococcus saprophyticus 5 Enterobacter cloacae 2 Micrococcus species 2 Providencia stuartii 1 Corynebacterium species 2 Providencia species 1 Streptococcus groupe B 2 Enterobacter agglomerans 2 Staphylococcus simulans 2 Providencia rettgeri 2 Staphylococcus ludgunensis 1 Neisseria mucosa 1 Staphylococcus capitis 2 Providencia alcalifaciens 1 Staphylococcus haemolyticus 2 Providencia rustigianii 1 Staphylococcus hominis 2 Burkholderia cepacia 2 Enterococcus faecalis 2 Enterobacter aerogenes 2 Enterococcus faecium 1 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 2 Staphylococcus warneri 1 Pseudomonas fluorescens 1 Enterococcus durans 1 Comamonas acidovorans 2 Streptococcus bovis 1 Pseudomonas putida 2 Diphteroids 2 Haemophilus influenzae 5 Lactobacillus acidophilus 1 Haemophilus parainfluenzae 2 Bordetella pertussis 2 Haemophilus parahaemolyticus 2 Haemophilus haemolyticus 2 Haemophilus aegyptius 1 Kingella indologenes 1 Moraxella atlantae 1 Neisseria caviae 1 Neisseria subflava 1 Moraxella urethralis 1 Shigella sonnei 1 Shigella flexneri 1 Klebsiella oxytoca 2 Serratia marcescens 2 Salmonella typhimurium 1 Yersinia enterocolitica 1 Acinetobacter calcoaceticus 1 Acinetobacter lwoffi 1 Haftnia alvei 2 Citrobacter diversus 1 Citrobacter freundii 1 Salmonella species 1 -
TABLE 6 Species-specific DNA fragment and oligonucleotide probes for hybridization. Number of fragment probesb Number of oligonucleotide probes Organismsa Tested Specific Ubiquitousc Synthesized Specific Ubiquitousc E. coli d — — — 20 12 9f E. coli 14 2 2e — — — K. pneumoniae d — — — 15 1 1 K. pneumoniae 33 3 3 18 12 8 P. mirabilis d — — — 3 3 2 P. mirabilis 14 3 3e 15 8 7 P. aeruginosa d — — — 26 13 9 P. aeruginosa 6 2 2e 6 0 0 S. saprophyticus 7 4 4 20 9 7 H. influenzae d — — — 16 2 2 H. influenzae 1 1 1 20 1 1 S. pneumoniae d — — — 6 1 1 S. pneumoniae 19 2 2 4 1 1 M. catarrhalis 2 2 2 9 8 8 S. epidermidis 62 1 1 — — — S. aureus 30 1 1 — — — Universal probesd — — — 7 — 7g
aNo DNA fragment or oligonucleotide probes were tested for E. faecalis and S. pyogenes.
bSizes of DNA fragments range from 0.25 to 5.0 kbp.
cA specific probe was considered ubiquitous when at least 80% of isolates of the target species (approximately 80 isolates) were recognized by each specific probe. When 2 or more probes are combined, 100% of the isolates are recognized.
dThese sequences were selected from data banks.
eUbiquity tested with approximately 10 isolates of the target species.
fA majority of probes (8/9) do not discriminate E. coli and Shigella spp.
gUbiquity tests with a pool of the 7 probes detected all 66 bacterial species listed in Table 5.
-
TABLE 7 PCR amplification for bacterial pathogens commonly encountered in urine, sputum, blood, cerebrospinal fluid and other specimens. Primer paira Amplicon DNA amplification Organism # (SEQ ID NO) size (bp) Ubiquityb from coloniesc from specimensd E. coli le (55-56) 107 75/80 + + 2e (46-47) 297 77/80 + + 3 (42-43) 102 78/80 + + 4 (131-132) 134 73/80 + + 1 + 3 + 4 — 80/80 + + E.faecalis 1e (38-39) 200 71/80 + + 2e (40-41) 121 79/80 + + 1 + 2 — 80/80 + + K. pneumoniae 1 (67-68) 198 76/80 + + 2 (61-62) 143 67/80 + + 3h (135-136) 148 78/80 + N.T.i 4 (137-138) 116 69/80 + N.T. 1 + 2 + 3 — 80/80 + N.T. P. mirabilis 1 (74-75) 167 73/80 + N.T. 2 (133-134) 123 80/80 + N.T. P. aeruginosa 1e (83-84) 139 79/80 + N.T. 2e (85-86) 223 80/80 + N.T. S. saprophyticus 1 (98-99) 126 79/80 + + 2 (139-140) 190 80/80 + N.T. M. catarrhalis 1 (112-113) 157 79/80 + N.T. 2 (118-119) 118 80/80 + N.T. 3 (160-119) 137 80/80 + N.T. H. influenzae 1e (154-155) 217 80/80 + N.T. S. pneumoniae 1e (156-157) 134 80/80 + N.T. 2e (158-159) 197 74/80 + N.T. 3 (78-79) 175 67/80 + N.T. S. epidermidis 1 (147-148) 175 80/80 + N.T. 2 (145-146) 125 80/80 + N.T. S. aureus 1 (152-153) 108 80/80 + N.T. 2 (149-150) 151 80/80 + N.T. 3 (149-151) 176 80/80 + N.T. S. pyogenes f 1e (141-142) 213 80/80 + N.T. 2e (143-144) 157 24/24 + N.T. Universal 1e (126-127) 241 194/195g + +
See notes on next page
- a All primer pairs are specific in PCR assays since no amplification was observed with DNA from 66 different species of both Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria other than the species of interest (Table 5).
- b The ubiquity was normally tested on 80 strains of the species of interest. All retained primer pairs amplified at least 90% of the isolates. When combinations of primers were used, an ubiquity of 100% was reached.
- c For all primer pairs and multiplex combinations, PCR amplifications directly performed from a bacterial colony were 100% species-specific.
- d PCR assays performed directly from urine specimens.
- e Primer pairs derived from data bank sequences. Primer pairs with no “e” are derived from our species-specific fragments.
- f For S. pyogenes, primer pair #1 is specific for Group A Streptococci (GAS). Primer pair #2 is specific for the GAS-producing exotoxin A gene (SpeA).
- g Ubiquity tested on 195 isolates from 23 species representative of bacterial pathogens commonly encountered in clinical specimens.
- h Optimizations are in progress to eliminate non-specific amplification observed with some bacterial species other than the target species.
- N.T.: not tested.
TABLE 8 Selected antibiotic resistance genes for diagnostic purposes. Genes Antibiotics Bacteriaa SEQ ID NO (blatem) TEM-1 β-lactams Enterobacteriaceae, 161 Pseudomonadaceae, Haemophilus, Neisseria (blarob) ROB-1 β-lactams Haemophilus, Pasteurella 162 (blashv) SHV-1 β-lactams Klebsiella and other 163 Enterobacteriaceae aadB, aacC1, aacC2, Aminoglycosides Enterobacteriaceae, 164, 165, 166 aacC3, aacA4 Pseudomonadaceae 167, 168 mecA β-lactams Staphylococci 169 vanH, vanA, vanX Vancomycin Enterococci 170 satA Macrolides Enterococci 173 aacA-aphD Aminoglycosides Enterococci, Staphylococci 174 vat Macrolides Staphylococci 175 vga Macrolides Staphylococci 176 msrA Erythromycin Staphylococci 177 Int and Sul β-lactams, trimethoprim, Enterobacteriaceae, 171, 172 conserved sequences aminoglycosides, antiseptic, Pseudomonadaceae chloramphenicol
aBacteria having high incidence for the specified antibiotic resistance genes. The presence in other bacteria is not excluded.
-
Annex I: Specific and ubiquitous oligonucleotides probes for hybridization Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Bacterial species: Escherichia coli 44 5′-CAC CCG CTT GCG TGG CAA GCT GCC C 5a 213-237 45 5′-CGT TTG TGG ATT CCA GTT CCA TCC G 5a 489-513 48 5′-TGA AGC ACT GGC CGA AAT GCT GCG T 6a 759-783 49 5′-GAT GTA CAG GAT TCG TTG AAG GCT T 6a 898-922 50 5′-TAG CGA AGG CGT AGC AGA AAC TAA C 7a 1264-1288 51 5′-GCA ACC CGA ACT CAA CGC CGG ATT T 7a 1227-1251 52 5′-ATA CAC AAG GGT CGC ATC TGC GGC C 7a 1313-1337 53 5′-TGC GTA TGC ATT GCA GAC CTT GTG GC 7a 111-136 54 5′-GCT TTC ACT GGA TAT CGC GCT TGG G 7a 373-397 Bacterial species: Proteus mirabilis 70b 5′-TGG TTC ACT GAC TTT GCG ATG TTT C 12 23-47 71 5′-TCG AGG ATG GCA TGC ACT AGA AAA T 12 53-77 72b 5′-CGC TGA TTA GGT TTC GCT AAA ATC TTA TTA 12 80-109 73 5′-TTG ATC CTC ATT TTA TTA ATC ACA TGA CCA 12 174-203
aSequences from data banks
bThese sequences are from the opposite DNA strand of the sequences given in the Sequence listing
-
Annex I: Specific and ubiquitous oligonucleotides probes for hybridization Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Bacterial species: Proteus mirabilis 76 5′-CCG CCT TTA GCA TTA ATT GGT GTT TAT AGT 13 246-275 77 5′-CCT ATT GCA GAT ACC TTA AAT GTC TTG GGC 13 291-320 80b 5′-TTG AGT GAT GAT TTC ACT GAC TCC C 14 18-42 81 5′-GTG AGA CAG TGA TGG TGA GGA CAC A 15a 1185-1209 82 5′-TGG TTG TCA TGC TGT TTG TGT GAA AAT 15a 1224-1230 Bacterial species: Klebsiella pneumoniae 57 5′-GTG GTG TCG TTC AGG GGT TTC AC 8 45-67 58 5′-GCG ATA TTC ACA CCC TAC GCA GCC A 9 161-185 59b 5′-GTC GAA AAT GCC GGA AGA GGT ATA CG 9 203-228 60b 5′-ACT GAG CTG CAG ACC GGT AAA ACT CA 9 233-258 63b 5′-CGT GAT GGA TAT TCT TAA CGA AGG GC 10 250-275 64b 5′-ACC AAA CTG TTG AGC CGC CTG GA 10 201-223 65 5′-GTG ATC GCC CCT CAT CTG CTA CT 10 77-99 66 5′-CGC CCT TCG TTA AGA ATA TCC ATC AC 10 249-274 69 5′-CAG GAA GAT GCT GCA CCG GTT GTT G 11a 296-320
aSequences from data banks
bThese sequences are from the opposite DNA strand of the sequences given in the Sequence listing
-
Annex I: Specific and ubiquitous oligonucleotides probes for hybridization Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Bacterial species: Pseudomonas aeruginosa 87 5′-AAT GCG GCT GTA CCT CGG CGC TGG T 18a 2985-3009 88 5′-GGC GGA GGG CCA GTT GCA CCT GCC A 18a 2929-2953 89 5′-AGC CCT GCT CCT CGG CAG CCT CTG C 18a 2821-2845 90 5′-TGG CTT TTG CAA CCG CGT TCA GGT T 18a 1079-1103 91 5′-GCG CCC GCG AGG GCA TGC TTC GAT G 19a 705-729 92 5′-ACC TGG GCG CCA ACT ACA AGT TCT A 19a 668-692 93 5′-GGC TAC GCT GCC GGG CTG CAG GCC G 19a 505-529 94 5′-CCG ATC TAG ACC ATC GAG ATG GGC G 20a 1211-1235 95 5′-GAG CGC GGC TAT GTG TTC GTC GGC T 20a 2111-2135 Bacterial species: Streptococcus pneumoniae 120 5′-TCT GTG CTA GAG ACT GCC CCA TTT C 30 423-447 121 5′-CGA TGT CTT GAT TGA GCA GGG TTA T 31a 1198-1222
aSequences from data banks
bThese sequences are from the opposite DNA strand of the sequences given in the Sequence listing
-
Annex I: Specific and ubiquitous oligonucleotides probes for hybridization Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Bacterial species: Staphylococcus saprophyticus 96 5′-CGT TTT TAC CCT TAC CTT TTC GTA CTA CC 21 45-73 97b 5′-TCA GGC AGA GGT AGT ACG AAA AGG TAA GGG 21 53-82 100 5′-CAC CAA GTT TGA CAC GTG AAG ATT CAT 22 89-115 101b 5′-ATG AGT GAA GCG GAG TCA GAT TAT GTG CAG 23 105-134 102 5′-CGC TCA TTA CGT ACA GTG ACA ATC G 24 20-44 103 5′-CTG GTT AGC TTG ACT CTT AAC AAT CTT GTC 24 61-90 104b 5′-GAC GCG ATT GTC ACT GTA CGT AAT GAG CGA 24 19-48 Bacterial species: Moraxella catarrhalis 108 5′-GCC CCA AAA CAA TGA AAC ATA TGG T-3′ 28 81-105 109 5′-CTG CAG ATT TTG GAA TCA TAT CGC C-3′ 28 126-130 110 5′-TGG TTT GAC CAG TAT TTA ACG CCA T-3′ 28 165-189 111 5′-CAA CGG CAC CTG ATG TAC CTT GTA C-3′ 28 232-256 114 5′-TTA CAA CCT GCA CCA CAA GTC ATC A-3′ 29 97-121 115 5′-GTA CAA ACA AGC CGT CAG CGA CTT A-3′ 29 139-163 116 5′-CAA TCT GCG TGT GTG CGT TCA CT-3′ 29 178-200 117 5′-GCT ACT TTG TCA GCT TTA GCC ATT CA-3′ 29 287-312
aSequences from data banks
bThese sequences are from the opposite DNA strand of the sequences given in the Sequence listing
-
Annex I: Specific and ubiquitous oligonucleotides probes for hybridization Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID Nucleotide SEQ ID NO Nucleotide sequence NO position Bacterial species: Haemophilus influenzae 105b 5′-GCG TCA GAA AAA GTA GGC GAA ATG AAA G 25 138-165 106b 5′-AGC GGC TCT ATC TTG TAA TGA CAC A 26a 770-794 107b 5′-GAA ACG TGA ACT CCC CTC TAT ATA A 27a 5184-5208 Universal probesc 122b 5′-ATC CCA CCT TAG GCG GCT GGC TCC A — — 123 5′-ACG TCA AGT CAT CAT GGC CCT TAC GAG TAG G — — 124b 5′-GTG TGA CGG GCG GTG TGT ACA AGG C — — 125b 5′-GAG TTG CAG ACT CCA ATC CGG ACT ACG A — — 128b 5′-CCC TAT ACA TCA CCT TGC GGT TTA GCA GAG AG — — 129 5′-GGG GGG ACC ATC CTC CAA GGC TAA ATA C — — 130b 5′-CGT CCA CTT TCG TGT TTG CAG AGT GCT GTG TT — —
aSequences from data banks
bThese sequences are from the opposite DNA strand of the sequences given in the Sequence listing
cUniversal probes were derived from 16S or 23S ribosomal RNA gene sequences not included in the Sequence listing
-
Annex II: Specific and ubiquitous primers for DNA amplification Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Bacterial species: Escherichia coli 42 5′-GCT TTC CAG CGT CAT ATT G 4 177-195 43b 5′-GAT CTC GAC AAA ATG GTG A 4 260-278 46 5′-TCA CCC GCT TGC GTG GC 5a 212-228 47b 5′-GGA ACT GGA ATC CAC AAA C 5a 490-508 55 5′-GCA ACC CGA ACT CAA CGC C 7a 1227-1245 56b 5′-GCA GAT GCG ACC CTT GTG T 7a 1315-1333 131 5′-CAG GAG TAC GGT GAT TTT TA 3 60-79 132b 5′-ATT TCT GGT TTG GTC ATA CA 3 174-193 Bacterial species: Enterococcus faecalis 38 5′-GCA ATA CAG GGA AAA ATG TC 1a 69-88 39b 5′-CTT CAT CAA ACA ATT AAC TC 1a 249-268 40 5′-GAA CAG AAG AAG CCA AAA AA 2a 569-588 41b 5′-GCA ATC CCA AAT AAT ACG GT 2a 670-689
aSequences from data banks
b These sequences are from the opposite DNA strand of the sequences given in the Sequence listing
-
Annex II: Specific and ubiquitous primers for DNA amplification Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Bacterial species: Klebsiella pneumoniae 61 5′-GAC AGT CAG TTC GTC AGC C 9 37-55 62b 5′-CGT AGG GTG TGA ATA TCG C 9 161-179 67 5′-TCG CCC CTC ATC TGC TAC T 10 81-99 68b 5′-GAT CGT GAT GGA TAT TCT T 10 260-278 135 5′-GCA GCG TGG TGT CGT TCA 8 40-57 136b 5′-AGC TGG CAA CGG CTG GTC 8 170-187 137 5′-ATT CAC ACC CTA CGC AGC CA 9 166-185 138b 5′-ATC CGG CAG CAT CTC TTT GT 9 262-281 Bacterial species: Proteus mirabilis 74 5′-GAA ACA TCG CAA AGT CAG T 12 23-41 75b 5′-ATA AAA TGA GGA TCA AGT TC 12 170-189 133 5′-CGG GAG TCA GTG AAA TCA TC 14 17-36 134b 5′-CTA AAA TCG CCA CAC CTC TT 14 120-139
aSequences from data banks
bThese sequences are from the opposite DNA strand of the sequences given in the Sequence listing
-
Annex II: Specific and ubiquitous primers for DNA amplification Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Bacterial species: Staphylococcus saprophyticus 98 5′-CGT TTT TAC CCT TAC CTT TTC GTA CT 21 45-70 99b 5′-ATC GAT CAT CAC ATT CCA TTT GTT TTT A 21 143-170 139 5′-CTG GTT AGC TTG ACT CTT AAC AAT C 24 61-85 140b 5′-TCT TAA CGA TAG AAT GGA GCA ACT G 24 226-250 Bacterial species: Pseudomonas aeruginosa 83 5′-CGA GCG GGT GGT GTT CAT C 16a 554-572 84b 5′-CAA GTC GTG GTG GGA GGG A 16a 674-692 85 5′-TCG CTG TTC ATC AAG ACC C 17a 1423-1441 86b 5′-CCG AGA ACC AGA CTT CAT C 17a 1627-1645 Bacterial species: Moraxella catarrhalis 112 5′-GGC ACC TGA TGT ACC TTG 28 235-252 113b 5′-AAC AGC TCA CAC GCA TT 28 375-391 118 5′-TGT TTT GAG CTT TTT ATT TTT TGA 29 41-64 119b 5′-CGC TGA CGG CTT GTT TGT ACC A 29 137-158 160 5′-GCT CAA ATC AGG GTC AGC 29 22-39 119b 5′-CGC TGA CGG CTT GTT TGT ACG A 29 137-158
aSequences from data banks
bThese sequences are from the opposite DNA strand of the sequences given in the Sequence listing
-
Annex II: Specific and ubiquitous primers for DNA amplification Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Bacterial species: Staphylococcus epidermidis 145 5′-ATC AAA AAG TTG GCG AAC CTT TTC A 36 21-45 146b 5′-CAA AAG AGC GTG GAG AAA AGT ATC A 36 121-145 147 5′-TCT CTT TTA ATT TCA TCT TCA ATT CCA TAG 36 448-477 148b 5′-AAA CAC AAT TAC AGT CTG GTT ATC CAT ATC 36 593-622 Bacterial species: Staphylococcus aureus 149b 5′-CTT CAT TTT ACG GTG ACT TCT TAG AAG ATT 37 409-438 150 5′-TCA ACT GTA GCT TCT TTA TCC ATA CGT TGA 37 288-317 149b 5′-CTT CAT TTT ACG GTG ACT TCT TAG AAG ATT 37 409-438 151 5′-ATA TTT TAG CTT TTC AGT TTC TAT ATC AAC 37 263-292 152 5′-AAT CTT TGT CGG TAC ACG ATA TTC TTC ACG 37 5-34 153b 5′-CGT AAT GAG ATT TCA GTA GAT AAT ACA ACA 37 83-112
aSequences from data banks
bThese sequences are from the opposite DNA strand of the sequences given in the Sequence listing
-
Annex II: Specific and ubiquitous primers for DNA amplification Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Bacterial species: Haemophilus influenzae 154 5′-TTT AAC GAT CCT TTT ACT CCT TTT G 27a 5074-5098 155b 5′-ACT GCT GTT GTA AAG AGG TTA AAA T 27a 5266-5290 Bacterial species: Streptococcus pneumoniae 78 5′-AGT AAA ATG AAA TAA GAA CAG GAC AG 34 164-189 79b 5′-AAA ACA GGA TAG GAG AAC GGG AAA A 34 314-338 156 5′-ATT TGG TGA CGG GTG ACT TT 31a 1401-1420 157b 5′-GCT GAG GAT TTG TTC TTC TT 31a 1515-1534 158 5′-GAG CGG TTT CTA TGA TTG TA 35a 1342-1361 159b 5′-ATC TTT CCT TTC TTG TTC TT 35a 1519-1538 Bacterial species: Streptococcus pyogenes 141 5′-TGA AAA TTC TTG TAA CAG GC 32a 286-305 142b 5′-GGC CAC CAG CTT GCC CAA TA 32a 479-498 143 5′-ATA TTT TCT TTA TGA GGG TG 33a 966-985 144b 5′-ATC CTT AAA TAA AGT TGC CA 33a 1103-1122
aSequences from data banks
bThese sequences are from the opposite DNA strand of the sequences given in the Sequence listing
-
Annex II: Specific and ubiquitous primers for DNA amplification Originating DNA fragment SEQ ID NO Nucleotide Sequence SEQ ID NO Nucleotide position Universal primersc 126 5′-GGA GGA AGG TGG GGA TGA CG — — 127b 5′-ATG GTG TGA CGG GCG GTG TG — —
a Sequences from data banks
b These sequences are from the opposite DNA strand of the sequences given in the Sequence listing
c Universal primers were derived from the 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence not included in the Sequence listing
-
Annex III Selection of Universal Probes by Alignment of the Sequences of Bacterial 16S and 23S Ribosomal RNA Genes. Reverse strand of SEQ ID NO: 122 TGGAGCC AGCCGCCTA GGTGGGAT 1461 1510 Streptococcus salivarius TGAGGTAACC TTTTGGAGCC AGCCGCCTAA GGTGGGATAG ATGANNGGGG Proteus vulgaris TAGCTTAACC TTCGGGAGGG CGCTTACCAC TTTGTGATTC ATGACTGGGG Pseudomonas aeruginosa TAGTCTAACC GCAAGGGGGA CGGTTACCAC GGAGTGATTC ATGACTGGGG Neisseria gonorrhoeae TAGGGTAACC GCAAGGAGTC CGCTTACCAC GGTATGCTTC ATGACTGGGG Streptococcus lactis TTGCCTAACC GCAAGGAGGG CGCTTCCTAA GGTAAGACCG ATGACNNGGG -
Annex III. Selection of universal probes by alignment of the sequences of bacterial 165 and 23S ribosomal RNA genes. SEQ ID NO: 123 ACGTCAAGTC ATCATGGC CCTTACGAGT AGG 1251 1300 Haemophilus influenzae GGTNGGGATG ACGTCAAGTC ..ATCATGGC CCTTACGAGT AGGGCTACAC Neisseria gonorrhoeae GGTGGGGATG ACGTCAAGTC ..CTCATGGC CCTTATGACC AGGGCTTCAC Pseudomonas cepacia GGTNGGGATG ACGTCAAGTC ..CTCATGGC CCTTATGGGT AGGGCTTCAC Serratia marcescens GGTGGGGATG ACGTCAAGTC ..ATCATGGC CCTTACGAGT AGGGCTACAC Escherichia coli GGTGGGGATG ACGTCAAGTC ..ATCATGGC CCTTACGACC AGGGCTACAC Proteus vulgaris GGTGGGGATG ACGTTAAGTC GTATCATGGC CCTTACGAGT AGGGCTACAC Pseudomonas aeruginosa GGTGGGGATG ACGTCAAGTC ..ATCATGGC CCTTACGGCN AGGGCTACAC Clostridium perfringens GGTGGGGATG ACGTNNAATC ..ATCATGCC CNTTATGTGT AGGGCTACAC Mycoplasma hominis GGTGGGGATG ACGTCAAATC ..ATCATGCC TCTTACGAGT GGGGCCACAC Helicobacter pylori GGTGGGGACG ACGTCAAGTC ..ATCATGGC CCTTACGCCT AGGGCTACAC Mycoplasma pneumoniae GGAAGGGATG ACGTCAAATC ..ATCATGCC CCTTATGTCT AGGGCTGCAA -
Annex III. Selection of universal probes by alignment of the sequences of bacterial 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA genes. Reverse of the probe SEQ ID NO: 124 GCCTTGTACA CACCGCCCGT CACAC 1451 1490 Escherichia coli ACGTTCCCGG GCCTTGTACA CACCGCCCGT CACACCATGG Neisseria gonorrhoeae ACGTTCCCNG NNCTTGTACA CACCGCCCGT CACACCATGG Pseudomonas cepacia ACGTTCCCGG GTCTTGTACA CACNGCCCGT CACACCATGG Serratia marcescens ACGTTCCCGG GCCTTGTACA CACCGCCCGT CACACCATGG Proteus vulgaris ACGTTCCCGG GCCTTGTACA CACCGCCCGT CACACCATGG Haemophilus influenzae ACGTTCCCGG GCNTTGTACA CACCGCCCGT CACACCATGG Pseudomonas aeruginosa ACGTTCCCGG GCCTTGTACA CACCGCCCGT CACACCATGG Clostridium perfringens ACGTTCCCNG GTCTTGTACA CACCGCNCGT CACACCATGA Mycoplasma hominis ACGTTCTCGG GTCTTGTACA CACCGCCCGT CACACCATGG Helicobacter pylori ACGTTCCCGG GTCTTGTACT CACCGCCCGT CACACCATGG Mycoplasma pneumoniae ACGTTCTCGG GTCTTGTACA CACCGCCCGT CAAACTATGA -
Annex III. Selection of universal probes by alignment of the sequences of bacterial 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA genes. Reverse strand of SEQ ID NO 125: TCG TAGTCCGGAT TGGAGTCTGC AACTC 1361 1400 Escherichia coli AAGTGCGTCG TAGTCCGGAT TGGAGTCTGC AACTCGACTC Neisseria gonorrhoeae AAACCGATCG TAGTCCGGAT TGCACTCTGC AACTCGAGTG Pseudomonas cepacia AAACCGATCG TAGTCCGGAT TGCACTCTGC AACTCGAGTG Serratia marcescens AAGTATGTCG TAGTCCGGAT TGGAGTCTGC AACTCGACTC Proteus vulgaris AAGTCTGTCG TAGTCCGGAT TGGAGTCTGC AACTCGACTC Haemophilus influenzae AAGTACGTCT AAGTCCGGAT TGGAGTCTGC AACTCGACTC Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAACCGATCG TAGTCCGGAT CGCAGTCTGC AACTCGACTG Clostridium perfringens AAACCAGTCT CAGTTCGGAT TGTAGGCTGA AACTCGCCTA Mycoplasma hominis AAGCCGATCT CAGTTCGGAT TGGAGTCTGC AATTCGACTC Helicobacter pylori ACACC..TCT CAGTTCGGAT TGTAGGCTGC AACTCGCCTG Mycloplasma pneumoniae AAGTTGGTCT CAGTTCGGAT TGAGGGCTGC AATTCGTCCT -
Annex III. Selection of universal probes by alignment of the sequences of bacterial 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA genes. Reverse strand of SEQ ID NO: 128 CT CTCTGCTAAA CCGCAAGGTG ATGTATAGGG 1991 2040 Lactobacillus lactis AAACACAGCT CTCTGCTAAA CCGCAAGGTG ATGTATAGGG GGTGACGCCT Escherichia coli AAACACAGCA CTGTGCAAAC ACGAAAGTGG ACGTATACGG TGTGACGCCT Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAACACAGCA CTCTGCAAAC ACGAAAGTGG ACGTATAGGG TGTGACGCCT Pseudomonas cepacia AAACACAGCA CTCTGCAAAC ACGAAAGTGG ACGTATAGGG TGTGACGCCT Bacillus stearothermophilus AAACACAGGT CTCTGCGAAG TCGTAAGGCG ACGTATAGGG GCTGACACCT Micrococcus luteus AAACACAGGT CCATGCGAAG TCGTAAGACG ATGTATATGG ACTGACTCCT SEQ ID NO: 129 GGGGGGACC ATCCTCCAAG GCTAAATAC 481 530 Escherichia coli TGTCTGAATA TGGGGGGACC ATCCTCCAAG GCTAAATACT CCTGACTGAC Pseudomonas aeruginosa TGTCTGAACA TGGGGGGACC ATCCTCCAAG GCTAAATACT ACTGACTGAC Pseudomonas cepacia TGTCTGAAGA TGGGGGGACC ATCCTCCAAG GCTAAATACT CGTGATCGAC Lactobacillus lactis AGTTTGAATC CGGGAGGACC ATCTCCCAAC CCTAAATACT CCTTAGTGAC Micrococcus luteus CGTGTGAATC TGCCAGGACC ACCTGGTAAG CCTGAATACT ACCTGTTGAC -
Annex III. Selection of universal probes by alignment of the sequences of bacterial 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA genes. Reverse strand of SEQ ID NO: 130 AACACAGCA CTCTGCAAAC ACGAAAGTGG ACG 1981 2030 Pseudomonas aeruginosa TGTTTATTAA AAACACAGCA CTCTGCAAAC ACGAAAGTGG ACGTATAGGG Escherichia coli TGTTTATTAA AAACACAGCA CTGTGCAAAC ACGAAAGTGG ACGTATACGG Pseudomonas cepacia TGTTTAATAA AAACACAGCA CTCTGCAAAC ACGAAAGTGG ACGTATAGGG Bacillus stearothermophilus TGTTTATCAA AAACACAGGT CTCTGCGAAG TCGTAAGGCG ACGTATAGGG Lactobacillus lactis TGTTTATCAA AAACACAGCT CTCTGCTAAA CCACAAGGTG ATGTATAGGG Micrococcus luteus TGTTTATCAA AAACACAGGT CCATGCGAAG TCGTAAGACG ATGTATATGG -
Annex IV. Selection of the universal PCR primers by alignment of the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene SEQ ID NO: 126 GGAGGAA GGTGGGGATG ACG Reverse strand of SEQ ID NO: 127 CA CACCGCCCGT CACACCAT 1241 1270......1461 1490 Escherichia coli ACTGGAGGAA GGTGGGGATG ACGTCAAGTC......GCCTTGTACA CACCGCCCGT CACACCATGG Neisseria gonorrhoeae GCCGGAGGAA GGTGGGGATG ACGTCAAGTC......NNCTTGTACA CACCGCCCGT CACACCATGG Pseudomonas cepacia ACCGGAGGAA GGTNGGGATG ACGTCAAGTC......GTCTTGTACA CACNGCCCGT CACACCATGG Seratia marcescens ACTGGAGGAA GGTGGGGATG ACGTCAAGTC......GCCTTGTACA CACCGCCCGT CACACCATGG Proteus vulgaris ACCGGAGGAA GGTGGGGATG ACGTTAAGTC......GCCTTGTACA CACCGCCCGT CACACCATGG Haemophilus influenzae ACTGGAGGAA GGTNGGGATG ACGTCAAGTC......GCNTTGTACA CACCGCCCGT CACACCATGG Legionella pneumophila ACCGGAGGAA GGCGGGGATG ACGTCAAGTC......GCCTTGTACA CACCGCCCGT CACACCATGG Pseudomonas aeruginos ACCGGAGGAA GGTGGGGATG ACGTCAAGTC......GCCTTGTACA CACCGCCCGT CACACCATGG Clostridium perfringens CCAGGAGGAA GGTGGGGATG ACGTNNAATC......GTCTTGTACA CACCGCNCGT CACACCATGA Mycoplasma hominis CTGGGAGGAA GGTGGGGATG ACGTCAAATC......GTCTTGTACA CACCGCCCGT CACACCATGG Helicobacter pylori GGAGGAGGAA GGTGGGGACG ACGTCAAGTC......GTCTTGTACT CACCGCCCGT CACACCATGG Mycoplasma pneumoniae ATTGGAGGAA GGAAGGGATG ACGTCAAATC......GTCTTGTACA CACCGCCCGT CAAACTATGA -
Claims (131)
Priority Applications (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/121,120 US20050042606A9 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2002-04-11 | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US11/416,499 US7943346B2 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2006-05-01 | Probes and primers for detection of bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes |
US11/503,368 US20070009947A1 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2006-08-10 | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US11/842,092 US20090047671A1 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2007-08-20 | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US11/842,058 US20090053702A1 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2007-08-20 | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US11/842,080 US20090053703A1 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2007-08-20 | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US30473294A | 1994-09-12 | 1994-09-12 | |
US08/526,840 US6001564A (en) | 1994-09-12 | 1995-09-11 | Species specific and universal DNA probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and associated antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US09/452,599 US20020055101A1 (en) | 1995-09-11 | 1999-12-01 | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US10/121,120 US20050042606A9 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2002-04-11 | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
Related Parent Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/526,840 Continuation US6001564A (en) | 1994-09-12 | 1995-09-11 | Species specific and universal DNA probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and associated antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US09/452,599 Continuation US20020055101A1 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 1999-12-01 | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
Related Child Applications (5)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/416,499 Continuation US7943346B2 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2006-05-01 | Probes and primers for detection of bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes |
US11/503,368 Continuation US20070009947A1 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2006-08-10 | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US11/842,080 Continuation US20090053703A1 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2007-08-20 | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US11/842,058 Continuation US20090053702A1 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2007-08-20 | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US11/842,092 Continuation US20090047671A1 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2007-08-20 | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20030180733A1 US20030180733A1 (en) | 2003-09-25 |
US20050042606A9 true US20050042606A9 (en) | 2005-02-24 |
Family
ID=24099022
Family Applications (5)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/452,599 Abandoned US20020055101A1 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 1999-12-01 | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US10/121,120 Abandoned US20050042606A9 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2002-04-11 | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US11/416,499 Expired - Fee Related US7943346B2 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2006-05-01 | Probes and primers for detection of bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes |
US11/503,368 Abandoned US20070009947A1 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2006-08-10 | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US11/842,080 Abandoned US20090053703A1 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2007-08-20 | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/452,599 Abandoned US20020055101A1 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 1999-12-01 | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
Family Applications After (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/416,499 Expired - Fee Related US7943346B2 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2006-05-01 | Probes and primers for detection of bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes |
US11/503,368 Abandoned US20070009947A1 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2006-08-10 | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US11/842,080 Abandoned US20090053703A1 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2007-08-20 | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (5) | US20020055101A1 (en) |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030180733A1 (en) * | 1994-09-12 | 2003-09-25 | Bergeron Michel G. | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US20040185478A1 (en) * | 1997-11-04 | 2004-09-23 | Bergeron Michel G. | Species-specific, genus-specific and universal DNA probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial and fungal pathogens and associated antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US20090035780A1 (en) * | 2007-07-31 | 2009-02-05 | Mccarthy Larry | Detection of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus in biological samples |
US20090068641A1 (en) * | 1999-09-28 | 2009-03-12 | Bergeron Michel G | Highly conserved genes and their use to generate probes and primers for detection of microorganisms |
US20090081663A1 (en) * | 2007-04-19 | 2009-03-26 | Molecular Detection Inc. | Methods, compositions and kits for detection and analysis of antibiotic-resistant bacteria |
US20110178721A1 (en) * | 2008-10-07 | 2011-07-21 | Opticul Diagnostics Ltd. | Means and methods for detecting antibiotic resistant bacteria in a sample |
US20120058485A1 (en) * | 2007-01-25 | 2012-03-08 | Peter Kaith Rogan | Rapid and comprehensive identification of prokaryotic organisms (continuation) |
US8426137B2 (en) | 1996-11-04 | 2013-04-23 | Genohm Sciences Canada, Inc. | Methods and probes for detecting a vancomycin resistance gene |
US9365883B2 (en) | 2011-12-19 | 2016-06-14 | Opticul Diagnostics Ltd. | Spectroscopic means and methods for identifying microorganisms in culture |
CN106222252A (en) * | 2016-07-25 | 2016-12-14 | 中国水产科学研究院东海水产研究所 | Detect multiple PCR primer and the detection method of three kinds of integron related elements simultaneously |
Families Citing this family (86)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6001564A (en) * | 1994-09-12 | 1999-12-14 | Infectio Diagnostic, Inc. | Species specific and universal DNA probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and associated antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US20110166040A1 (en) * | 1997-09-05 | 2011-07-07 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of strains of e. coli o157:h7 |
WO2004060278A2 (en) | 2002-12-06 | 2004-07-22 | Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Methods for rapid identification of pathogens in humans and animals |
US7718354B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2010-05-18 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid identification of pathogens in humans and animals |
US7226739B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2007-06-05 | Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc | Methods for rapid detection and identification of bioagents in epidemiological and forensic investigations |
US7666588B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2010-02-23 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid forensic analysis of mitochondrial DNA and characterization of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy |
US20030027135A1 (en) * | 2001-03-02 | 2003-02-06 | Ecker David J. | Method for rapid detection and identification of bioagents |
US20040121311A1 (en) | 2002-12-06 | 2004-06-24 | Ecker David J. | Methods for rapid detection and identification of bioagents in livestock |
CA2348042A1 (en) | 2001-06-04 | 2002-12-04 | Ann Huletsky | Sequences for detection and identification of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus |
CA2451498A1 (en) * | 2001-06-22 | 2003-01-03 | Marshfield Clinic | Methods and oligonucleotides for the detection of salmonella sp., e. coli o157:h7, and listeria monocytogenes |
US7217510B2 (en) | 2001-06-26 | 2007-05-15 | Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Methods for providing bacterial bioagent characterizing information |
US8073627B2 (en) * | 2001-06-26 | 2011-12-06 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | System for indentification of pathogens |
US20050050101A1 (en) * | 2003-01-23 | 2005-03-03 | Vockley Joseph G. | Identification and use of informative sequences |
EP1587950A2 (en) * | 2003-01-31 | 2005-10-26 | Ethicon, Inc. | Cationic anti-microbial peptides and methods of use thereof |
US8046171B2 (en) | 2003-04-18 | 2011-10-25 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for genetic evaluation |
US8057993B2 (en) | 2003-04-26 | 2011-11-15 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for identification of coronaviruses |
US7964343B2 (en) | 2003-05-13 | 2011-06-21 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Method for rapid purification of nucleic acids for subsequent analysis by mass spectrometry by solution capture |
US8158354B2 (en) | 2003-05-13 | 2012-04-17 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid purification of nucleic acids for subsequent analysis by mass spectrometry by solution capture |
NZ543855A (en) * | 2003-06-05 | 2008-04-30 | Wyeth Corp | Nucleic acid arrays for detecting multiple strains of a non-viral species |
US20100129811A1 (en) * | 2003-09-11 | 2010-05-27 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of pseudomonas aeruginosa |
US8097416B2 (en) | 2003-09-11 | 2012-01-17 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for identification of sepsis-causing bacteria |
US20120122103A1 (en) | 2003-09-11 | 2012-05-17 | Rangarajan Sampath | Compositions for use in identification of bacteria |
US8546082B2 (en) * | 2003-09-11 | 2013-10-01 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for identification of sepsis-causing bacteria |
US8163895B2 (en) | 2003-12-05 | 2012-04-24 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of orthopoxviruses |
WO2005059165A2 (en) | 2003-12-09 | 2005-06-30 | Biomerieux, Inc. | Methods for detecting bacterial pathogens |
US7429464B2 (en) | 2003-12-09 | 2008-09-30 | Biomerieux, Inc. | Methods for detecting bacterial pathogens |
WO2005056817A2 (en) | 2003-12-09 | 2005-06-23 | Biomerieux, Inc. | Method for recovering microorganisms from a sample |
CN1914332A (en) * | 2003-12-15 | 2007-02-14 | 快速实验室微系统公司 | Assay for the identification of microorganisms |
US7666592B2 (en) | 2004-02-18 | 2010-02-23 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for concurrent identification and quantification of an unknown bioagent |
US8119336B2 (en) * | 2004-03-03 | 2012-02-21 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of alphaviruses |
CA2567839C (en) | 2004-05-24 | 2011-06-28 | Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Mass spectrometry with selective ion filtration by digital thresholding |
US20050266411A1 (en) | 2004-05-25 | 2005-12-01 | Hofstadler Steven A | Methods for rapid forensic analysis of mitochondrial DNA |
US7811753B2 (en) | 2004-07-14 | 2010-10-12 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for repairing degraded DNA |
AU2005335216A1 (en) * | 2004-10-05 | 2007-02-15 | Wyeth | Probe arrays for detecting multiple strains of different species |
KR100571847B1 (en) * | 2004-12-28 | 2006-04-17 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Cell Lysis Method by Microwave Using Ionic Additives |
CA2600184A1 (en) | 2005-03-03 | 2006-09-08 | Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of adventitious viruses |
US8084207B2 (en) | 2005-03-03 | 2011-12-27 | Ibis Bioscience, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of papillomavirus |
WO2006095941A1 (en) * | 2005-03-05 | 2006-09-14 | Seegene, Inc. | Processes using dual specificity oligonucleotide and dual specificity oligonucleotide |
US20060211002A1 (en) * | 2005-03-18 | 2006-09-21 | Jan Weile | Antibiotic susceptibility and virulence factor detection in Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
US20060240442A1 (en) * | 2005-04-20 | 2006-10-26 | Vevea Dirk N | Methods and oligonucleotides for the detection of Salmonella SP., E coli 0157:H7, and Listeria monocytogenes |
US20060252069A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2006-11-09 | Zhang Kunyan | Pcr for mrsa sccmec typing |
AU2006272776B2 (en) | 2005-07-21 | 2012-01-19 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid identification and quantitation of nucleic acid variants |
US11834720B2 (en) * | 2005-10-11 | 2023-12-05 | Geneohm Sciences, Inc. | Sequences for detection and identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) of MREJ types xi to xx |
EP2010679A2 (en) | 2006-04-06 | 2009-01-07 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for the use in identification of fungi |
EP2064332B1 (en) | 2006-09-14 | 2012-07-18 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Targeted whole genome amplification method for identification of pathogens |
WO2008104002A2 (en) | 2007-02-23 | 2008-08-28 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid forensic dna analysis |
US20100291544A1 (en) * | 2007-05-25 | 2010-11-18 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of strains of hepatitis c virus |
WO2008151023A2 (en) | 2007-06-01 | 2008-12-11 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods and compositions for multiple displacement amplification of nucleic acids |
WO2009038840A2 (en) * | 2007-06-14 | 2009-03-26 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of adventitious contaminant viruses |
WO2009049007A2 (en) * | 2007-10-10 | 2009-04-16 | Magellan Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions, methods and systems for rapid identification of pathogenic nucleic acids |
US20090162863A1 (en) * | 2007-12-13 | 2009-06-25 | Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation | Nucleic acid detection probe |
FI121428B (en) | 2008-01-17 | 2010-11-15 | Mobidiag Oy | Broad-spectrum primers, test kit and method for detection and identification of bacterial species |
US20110097704A1 (en) * | 2008-01-29 | 2011-04-28 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of picornaviruses |
US20110177515A1 (en) * | 2008-05-30 | 2011-07-21 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of francisella |
WO2009155103A2 (en) * | 2008-05-30 | 2009-12-23 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of tick-borne pathogens |
US20110151437A1 (en) * | 2008-06-02 | 2011-06-23 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of adventitious viruses |
EP2344893B1 (en) | 2008-09-16 | 2014-10-15 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Microplate handling systems and methods |
US8550694B2 (en) | 2008-09-16 | 2013-10-08 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Mixing cartridges, mixing stations, and related kits, systems, and methods |
US8148163B2 (en) | 2008-09-16 | 2012-04-03 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Sample processing units, systems, and related methods |
WO2010039696A1 (en) * | 2008-10-02 | 2010-04-08 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of herpesviruses |
WO2010039755A1 (en) * | 2008-10-02 | 2010-04-08 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of members of the bacterial genus mycoplasma |
US20110183346A1 (en) * | 2008-10-03 | 2011-07-28 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of neisseria, chlamydia, and/or chlamydophila bacteria |
US20110183344A1 (en) * | 2008-10-03 | 2011-07-28 | Rangarajan Sampath | Compositions for use in identification of clostridium difficile |
WO2010039848A2 (en) * | 2008-10-03 | 2010-04-08 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of streptococcus pneumoniae |
WO2010039775A1 (en) * | 2008-10-03 | 2010-04-08 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of members of the bacterial class alphaproteobacter |
WO2010039763A2 (en) * | 2008-10-03 | 2010-04-08 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of antibiotic-resistant bacteria |
WO2010076013A1 (en) * | 2008-12-30 | 2010-07-08 | Qiagen Gmbh | Method for detecting methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa) strains |
US8158936B2 (en) | 2009-02-12 | 2012-04-17 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Ionization probe assemblies |
US9719083B2 (en) | 2009-03-08 | 2017-08-01 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Bioagent detection methods |
WO2010114842A1 (en) | 2009-03-30 | 2010-10-07 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Bioagent detection systems, devices, and methods |
WO2011008972A1 (en) | 2009-07-17 | 2011-01-20 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Systems for bioagent identification |
WO2011008971A1 (en) | 2009-07-17 | 2011-01-20 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Lift and mount apparatus |
WO2011014811A1 (en) | 2009-07-31 | 2011-02-03 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Capture primers and capture sequence linked solid supports for molecular diagnostic tests |
WO2011017656A2 (en) | 2009-08-06 | 2011-02-10 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Non-mass determined base compositions for nucleic acid detection |
US20110065111A1 (en) * | 2009-08-31 | 2011-03-17 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions For Use In Genotyping Of Klebsiella Pneumoniae |
ES2628739T3 (en) | 2009-10-15 | 2017-08-03 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Multiple displacement amplification |
US20110111403A1 (en) * | 2009-10-30 | 2011-05-12 | Life Technologies Corporation | Multi-primer assay for mycoplasma detection |
US9758840B2 (en) * | 2010-03-14 | 2017-09-12 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Parasite detection via endosymbiont detection |
KR101289310B1 (en) * | 2012-11-09 | 2013-07-24 | 주식회사 현일바이오 | MRSA detection method and kit using same |
CN106661606B (en) | 2014-06-13 | 2021-12-21 | Q-莱纳公司 | Method for detecting and characterizing microorganisms |
WO2016164407A2 (en) | 2015-04-07 | 2016-10-13 | Polyskope Labs | Detection of one or more pathogens |
GB201507026D0 (en) | 2015-04-24 | 2015-06-10 | Linea Ab Q | Medical sample transportation container |
GB2554767A (en) | 2016-04-21 | 2018-04-11 | Q Linea Ab | Detecting and characterising a microorganism |
CN108753930A (en) * | 2018-05-31 | 2018-11-06 | 刘健刚 | The method of encephalic bacterium infection after the quick detection techniques of multiple real time fluorescence PCR |
CN113151517B (en) * | 2021-04-07 | 2022-07-26 | 安徽师范大学 | Aminoglycoside antibiotic resistance gene detection primer and kit |
CN112980982B (en) * | 2021-05-18 | 2021-08-10 | 至善时代智能科技(北京)有限公司 | Primers and detection kit for identifying multiple staphylococci based on pheS gene and application thereof |
Citations (32)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4816389A (en) * | 1984-07-13 | 1989-03-28 | Institut Pasteur | Probe for DNA and a process for the detection of "shigellae" and entero-invasive strains of Escherichia coli |
US5030556A (en) * | 1989-03-30 | 1991-07-09 | Danielle Beaulieu | Species-specific DNNA probe for the detection of Branhamella catarrhalis |
US5041372A (en) * | 1988-11-02 | 1991-08-20 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of Health And Human Services | Probe to identify enteroinvasive E. coli and Shigella species |
US5084565A (en) * | 1988-08-18 | 1992-01-28 | Gene-Trak Systems | Probes for the specific detection of escherichia coli and shigella |
US5089386A (en) * | 1987-09-11 | 1992-02-18 | Gene-Trak Systems | Test for listeria |
US5162199A (en) * | 1989-06-22 | 1992-11-10 | Boehringer Mannheim Gmbh | Neisseria-specific dna probe |
US5232831A (en) * | 1991-06-28 | 1993-08-03 | Gen-Probe Incorporated | Nucleic acid probes to streptococcus pyogenes |
US5292874A (en) * | 1991-09-04 | 1994-03-08 | Gen-Probe Incorporated | Nucleic acid probes to Staphylococcus aureus |
US5298392A (en) * | 1990-01-19 | 1994-03-29 | Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. | Process for detection of water-borne microbial pathogens and indicators of human fecal contamination in water samples and kits therefor |
US5334501A (en) * | 1989-07-11 | 1994-08-02 | Microprobe Corporation | Quantification of bacteria using a nucleic acid hybridization assay |
US5401631A (en) * | 1989-05-31 | 1995-03-28 | Amoco Corporation | Universal eubacteria nucleic acid probes and assay methods |
US5437978A (en) * | 1991-08-05 | 1995-08-01 | Wakunaga Seiyaku Kabushiki Kaisha | Detection for Staphylococcus spp. |
US5472843A (en) * | 1991-04-25 | 1995-12-05 | Gen-Probe Incorporated | Nucleic acid probes to Haemophilus influenzae |
US5476929A (en) * | 1991-02-15 | 1995-12-19 | Uab Research Foundation | Structural gene of pneumococcal protein |
US5523205A (en) * | 1988-08-02 | 1996-06-04 | Institut Pasteur | DNA probes specific for hemolytic listeria |
US5523217A (en) * | 1991-10-23 | 1996-06-04 | Baylor College Of Medicine | Fingerprinting bacterial strains using repetitive DNA sequence amplification |
US5541308A (en) * | 1986-11-24 | 1996-07-30 | Gen-Probe Incorporated | Nucleic acid probes for detection and/or quantitation of non-viral organisms |
US5574145A (en) * | 1989-04-20 | 1996-11-12 | Bioresearch Ireland | Isolated nucleic acid molecules targeted to the region intermidiate to the 16S and 23S rRNA genes useful as probes for determining bacteria |
US5599665A (en) * | 1993-12-21 | 1997-02-04 | Mcw Research Foundation | Pseudomonas aeruginosa nucleic acids encoding exoenzyme S activity and use thereof in detecting pseudomonas aeruginosa infection |
US5627275A (en) * | 1994-04-25 | 1997-05-06 | University Of Hawaii | Detection and identification of enteric pathogens |
US5652102A (en) * | 1994-12-05 | 1997-07-29 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture | Assay for enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli 0157:H7 by the polymerase chain reaction |
US5708160A (en) * | 1995-04-26 | 1998-01-13 | The National Research Council | HSP-60 genomic locus and primers for species identification |
US5866336A (en) * | 1996-07-16 | 1999-02-02 | Oncor, Inc. | Nucleic acid amplification oligonucleotides with molecular energy transfer labels and methods based thereon |
US5994066A (en) * | 1995-09-11 | 1999-11-30 | Infectio Diagnostic, Inc. | Species-specific and universal DNA probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and associated antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US6001564A (en) * | 1994-09-12 | 1999-12-14 | Infectio Diagnostic, Inc. | Species specific and universal DNA probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and associated antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US6037130A (en) * | 1998-07-28 | 2000-03-14 | The Public Health Institute Of The City Of New York, Inc. | Wavelength-shifting probes and primers and their use in assays and kits |
US6582908B2 (en) * | 1990-12-06 | 2003-06-24 | Affymetrix, Inc. | Oligonucleotides |
US6610836B1 (en) * | 1999-01-29 | 2003-08-26 | Genome Therapeutics Corporation | Nucleic acid amino acid sequences relating to Klebsiella pneumoniae for diagnostics and therapeutics |
US20040185478A1 (en) * | 1997-11-04 | 2004-09-23 | Bergeron Michel G. | Species-specific, genus-specific and universal DNA probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial and fungal pathogens and associated antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US20070009947A1 (en) * | 1994-09-12 | 2007-01-11 | Bergeron Michel G | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US20090068641A1 (en) * | 1999-09-28 | 2009-03-12 | Bergeron Michel G | Highly conserved genes and their use to generate probes and primers for detection of microorganisms |
US20100267012A1 (en) * | 1997-11-04 | 2010-10-21 | Bergeron Michel G | Highly conserved genes and their use to generate probes and primers for detection of microorganisms |
Family Cites Families (50)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA1231303A (en) | 1983-08-05 | 1988-01-12 | Robert J. Carrico | Detection of bacteria by nucleic acid hybridization |
IL71715A0 (en) | 1983-08-05 | 1984-09-30 | Miles Lab | Method,gene probes and test kit for detecting bacteria by nucleic acid hybridization |
FR2584419B1 (en) | 1985-07-08 | 1987-11-13 | Pasteur Institut | PROBE AND METHOD FOR DETECTING FACTORS OF RESISTANCE TO ERYTHROMYCIN IN CELL CULTURES, ESPECIALLY BACTERIAL |
FR2599743B1 (en) | 1986-06-10 | 1988-09-30 | Pasteur Institut | DNA FRAGMENT COMPRISING AT LEAST ONE PART OF AN ERYTHROMYCIN RESISTANCE GENE, METHOD FOR OBTAINING SAME AND BIOCHEMICAL APPLICATIONS THEREOF |
WO1988000618A1 (en) | 1986-07-10 | 1988-01-28 | Toray Industries, Inc. | Method of inspecting specimen for bacteria and probe therefor |
DE3752172T3 (en) | 1986-11-24 | 2008-04-10 | Gen-Probe Inc., San Diego | Nucleic acid probes for the detection and / or quantitation of non-viral organisms |
DE3718591A1 (en) | 1987-06-03 | 1988-12-15 | Behringwerke Ag | AEUSSERES MEMBRANE PROTEIN F BY PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA |
JP2801322B2 (en) | 1988-01-13 | 1998-09-21 | インスティチュート・パスツール | DNA probes specific for hemolytic Listeria |
US5282874A (en) * | 1988-03-14 | 1994-02-01 | Nobuyuki Tsukagoshi | Cultivation vessel and cultivation method of edible fungi |
JPH02203800A (en) | 1988-04-15 | 1990-08-13 | Innogenetics Sa:Nv | Crossing probe for detecting neisseria strain |
FR2636075B1 (en) | 1988-09-07 | 1991-11-15 | Biotechnologie Ste Europ | METHOD FOR DETECTING BACTERIA, YEAST, PARASITES AND OTHER EUKARYOTS, ESPECIALLY IN FOOD PRODUCTS |
CA1339731C (en) | 1988-10-12 | 1998-03-17 | Charles T. Caskey | Multiplex genomic dna amplification for deletion detection |
CA2031498A1 (en) | 1989-05-23 | 1990-11-24 | Raymond M. Nietupski | Nucleic acid probes for the detection of staphylococcus aureus |
NL9002157A (en) | 1989-11-27 | 1991-06-17 | U Gene Research Bv | DNA FRAGMENTS AND DNA PROBES AND PRIMERS BASED ON THAT. |
WO1991011531A1 (en) | 1990-02-02 | 1991-08-08 | N.V. Innogenetics S.A. | Hybridization probes for the detection of branhamella catarrhalis strains |
EP0452596A1 (en) | 1990-04-18 | 1991-10-23 | N.V. Innogenetics S.A. | Hybridization probes derived from the spacer region between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes for the detection of non-viral microorganisms |
SE466259B (en) | 1990-05-31 | 1992-01-20 | Arne Forsgren | PROTEIN D - AN IGD BINDING PROTEIN FROM HAEMOPHILUS INFLUENZAE, AND THE USE OF THIS FOR ANALYSIS, VACCINES AND PURPOSE |
EP0466251A1 (en) | 1990-07-10 | 1992-01-15 | Gist-Brocades N.V. | Elfamycin-resistant mutants |
BR9106752A (en) | 1990-08-16 | 1993-08-17 | Isis Pharmaceuticals Inc | OLIGONUCLEOTIDEO OR OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ANALOG, PROCESS FOR TREATING AN INFECTION BY CANDIDATE AND PROCESS FOR MODULATING CANDIDATE ACTIVITY |
DE69132830T2 (en) | 1990-10-05 | 2002-07-18 | F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ag, Basel | Methods and reagents for the identification of bacteria |
EP0533854A4 (en) | 1990-12-20 | 1994-06-08 | Hoffmann La Roche | Pcr primers for detection of legionella species and methods for controlling visual intensity in hybridization assays |
US5980909A (en) | 1991-02-15 | 1999-11-09 | Uab Research Foundation | Epitopic regions of pneumococcal surface protein A |
CA2104014C (en) | 1991-02-15 | 2000-05-02 | David E. Briles | Structural gene of pneumococcal protein |
DE69227379T2 (en) | 1991-07-31 | 1999-06-10 | F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ag, Basel | Methods and reagents for the determination of bacteria in the cerebrospinal fluid |
CA2075423A1 (en) | 1991-08-13 | 1993-02-14 | Paul Luther Skatrud | Rapid method for detection of methicillin resistant staphylococci |
ZA929319B (en) | 1991-12-11 | 1993-05-24 | Igen Inc | Method for exponential amplification of nucleic acid by a single unpaired primer. |
FR2686604B1 (en) | 1991-12-23 | 1995-06-09 | Bio Merieux | POLYPEPTIDES CONTAINING CHARACTERISTIC SEQUENCES OF PYRROLIDONE CARBOXYLYL PEPTIDASES, POLYNUCLEOTIDES CONTAINING A SEQUENCE ENCODING SUCH POLYPEPTIDES, AND THEIR USE. |
FR2685334B1 (en) | 1991-12-23 | 1995-05-05 | Bio Merieux | POLYPEPTIDES CONTAINING CHARACTERISTIC SEQUENCES OF PYRROLIDONE CARBOXYLYL PEPTIDASES, POLYNUCLEOTIDES CONTAINING A SEQUENCE ENCODING SUCH POLYPEPTIDES, AND THEIR USE. |
JPH0690798A (en) | 1992-02-05 | 1994-04-05 | Toagosei Chem Ind Co Ltd | Probe for detecting staphylococcus aureus and method for detecting the same |
FR2687168B1 (en) | 1992-02-10 | 1994-03-25 | Bio Merieux | FRAGMENT OF STREPTOCOCCUS PNEUMONIAE GENOMIC DNA, HYBRIDIZATION PROBE, AMPLIFIER PRIME, REAGENT AND METHOD FOR DETECTION OF STREPTOCOCCUS PNEUMONIAE. |
JPH0654700A (en) | 1992-05-19 | 1994-03-01 | Mitsui Toatsu Chem Inc | Highly sensitive detection of resistant bacterium |
EP1160334B1 (en) | 1992-07-07 | 2006-08-30 | Fuso Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. | Probe for diagnosing infectious disease arising from Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
IL106273A0 (en) | 1992-07-17 | 1993-11-15 | Res Dev Foundation | Rapid detection of biopolymers in stained specimens |
JPH06165681A (en) | 1992-12-02 | 1994-06-14 | Toyobo Co Ltd | Oligonucleotide for detection of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus, detection of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus and kit of detection reagent |
FR2699539B1 (en) | 1992-12-18 | 1995-02-17 | Pasteur Institut | Protein conferring an inducible type resistance to glycopeptides, especially in gram-positive bacteria. Nucleotide sequence encoding this protein. |
FR2701028B1 (en) | 1993-01-29 | 1995-04-21 | Pasteur Institut | Oligonucleotide sequences specifically hybridizing with a genyl sequence of campylobacter jejuni. Applications as probes and oligonucleotide primers. |
SG63589A1 (en) | 1993-05-14 | 1999-03-30 | Johnson & Johnson Clin Diag | Diagnostic compositions elements methods and test kits for amplification and detection of two or more dna's using primers having matched melting temperatures |
WO1995000650A1 (en) | 1993-06-23 | 1995-01-05 | Beckman Instruments, Inc. | Recombinant dnase b derived from streptococcus pyogenes |
JP3499263B2 (en) | 1993-09-03 | 2004-02-23 | 株式会社紀文食品 | Detection and nucleotide sequence of Klebsiella spp. |
US5712118A (en) | 1993-09-29 | 1998-01-27 | Research Foundation Of State University Of New York | Vaccine for branhamella catarrhalis |
JP3525475B2 (en) | 1994-01-10 | 2004-05-10 | 恵 河野 | Novel 'mecA protein, DNA encoding the same, and method for detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using the same |
US5582978A (en) | 1994-01-21 | 1996-12-10 | Amoco Corporation | Nucleic acid probes for the detection of Haemophilus influenzae |
ES2323161T3 (en) | 1994-06-24 | 2009-07-08 | Innogenetics N.V. | SIMULTANEOUS DETECTION, IDENTIFICATION AND DIFFERENTIATION OF MYCOBACTERIUM SPECIES USING A HYBRIDIZATION TEST. |
WO1996002648A1 (en) | 1994-07-19 | 1996-02-01 | American Cyanamid Company | Lkp pilin structural genes and operon of nontypable haemophilus influenzae |
US5668263A (en) | 1994-12-16 | 1997-09-16 | Smithkline Beecham Corporation | Conserved yeast nucleic acid sequences |
US5827515A (en) | 1995-08-30 | 1998-10-27 | Sandoz Ltd. | Bacillus thuringiensis sporulation gene |
US6737248B2 (en) | 1996-01-05 | 2004-05-18 | Human Genome Sciences, Inc. | Staphylococcus aureus polynucleotides and sequences |
WO1999024059A1 (en) | 1997-11-07 | 1999-05-20 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Pdgf-mediated microvascular communication and methods of use thereof |
AU5612099A (en) | 1998-09-03 | 2000-03-27 | University Of British Columbia, The | Method for the identification and speciation of bacteria of the (burkholderia cepacia) complex |
CA2509367C (en) | 2002-12-13 | 2013-01-08 | Infectio Diagnostic (I.D.I.) Inc. | Biological reagents and methods to verify the efficiency of sample preparation and nucleic acid amplification and/or detection |
-
1999
- 1999-12-01 US US09/452,599 patent/US20020055101A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2002
- 2002-04-11 US US10/121,120 patent/US20050042606A9/en not_active Abandoned
-
2006
- 2006-05-01 US US11/416,499 patent/US7943346B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2006-08-10 US US11/503,368 patent/US20070009947A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2007
- 2007-08-20 US US11/842,080 patent/US20090053703A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (38)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4816389A (en) * | 1984-07-13 | 1989-03-28 | Institut Pasteur | Probe for DNA and a process for the detection of "shigellae" and entero-invasive strains of Escherichia coli |
US5595874A (en) * | 1986-11-24 | 1997-01-21 | Gen-Probe Incorporated | Nucleic acid probes for detection and/or quantitation of non-viral organisms |
US5541308A (en) * | 1986-11-24 | 1996-07-30 | Gen-Probe Incorporated | Nucleic acid probes for detection and/or quantitation of non-viral organisms |
US5089386A (en) * | 1987-09-11 | 1992-02-18 | Gene-Trak Systems | Test for listeria |
US5523205A (en) * | 1988-08-02 | 1996-06-04 | Institut Pasteur | DNA probes specific for hemolytic listeria |
US5084565A (en) * | 1988-08-18 | 1992-01-28 | Gene-Trak Systems | Probes for the specific detection of escherichia coli and shigella |
US5041372A (en) * | 1988-11-02 | 1991-08-20 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of Health And Human Services | Probe to identify enteroinvasive E. coli and Shigella species |
US5030556A (en) * | 1989-03-30 | 1991-07-09 | Danielle Beaulieu | Species-specific DNNA probe for the detection of Branhamella catarrhalis |
US5574145A (en) * | 1989-04-20 | 1996-11-12 | Bioresearch Ireland | Isolated nucleic acid molecules targeted to the region intermidiate to the 16S and 23S rRNA genes useful as probes for determining bacteria |
US5401631A (en) * | 1989-05-31 | 1995-03-28 | Amoco Corporation | Universal eubacteria nucleic acid probes and assay methods |
US5162199A (en) * | 1989-06-22 | 1992-11-10 | Boehringer Mannheim Gmbh | Neisseria-specific dna probe |
US5334501A (en) * | 1989-07-11 | 1994-08-02 | Microprobe Corporation | Quantification of bacteria using a nucleic acid hybridization assay |
US5298392A (en) * | 1990-01-19 | 1994-03-29 | Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. | Process for detection of water-borne microbial pathogens and indicators of human fecal contamination in water samples and kits therefor |
US6582908B2 (en) * | 1990-12-06 | 2003-06-24 | Affymetrix, Inc. | Oligonucleotides |
US5476929A (en) * | 1991-02-15 | 1995-12-19 | Uab Research Foundation | Structural gene of pneumococcal protein |
US5472843A (en) * | 1991-04-25 | 1995-12-05 | Gen-Probe Incorporated | Nucleic acid probes to Haemophilus influenzae |
US5232831A (en) * | 1991-06-28 | 1993-08-03 | Gen-Probe Incorporated | Nucleic acid probes to streptococcus pyogenes |
US5437978A (en) * | 1991-08-05 | 1995-08-01 | Wakunaga Seiyaku Kabushiki Kaisha | Detection for Staphylococcus spp. |
US5292874A (en) * | 1991-09-04 | 1994-03-08 | Gen-Probe Incorporated | Nucleic acid probes to Staphylococcus aureus |
US5523217A (en) * | 1991-10-23 | 1996-06-04 | Baylor College Of Medicine | Fingerprinting bacterial strains using repetitive DNA sequence amplification |
US5599665A (en) * | 1993-12-21 | 1997-02-04 | Mcw Research Foundation | Pseudomonas aeruginosa nucleic acids encoding exoenzyme S activity and use thereof in detecting pseudomonas aeruginosa infection |
US5627275A (en) * | 1994-04-25 | 1997-05-06 | University Of Hawaii | Detection and identification of enteric pathogens |
US6001564A (en) * | 1994-09-12 | 1999-12-14 | Infectio Diagnostic, Inc. | Species specific and universal DNA probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and associated antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US20090053703A1 (en) * | 1994-09-12 | 2009-02-26 | Bergeron Michel G | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US20070009947A1 (en) * | 1994-09-12 | 2007-01-11 | Bergeron Michel G | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US20090053702A1 (en) * | 1994-09-12 | 2009-02-26 | Bergeron Michel G | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US20090047671A1 (en) * | 1994-09-12 | 2009-02-19 | Bergeron Michel G | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US20070105129A1 (en) * | 1994-09-12 | 2007-05-10 | Bergeron Michel G | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US5652102A (en) * | 1994-12-05 | 1997-07-29 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture | Assay for enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli 0157:H7 by the polymerase chain reaction |
US5708160A (en) * | 1995-04-26 | 1998-01-13 | The National Research Council | HSP-60 genomic locus and primers for species identification |
US5994066A (en) * | 1995-09-11 | 1999-11-30 | Infectio Diagnostic, Inc. | Species-specific and universal DNA probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and associated antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US5866336A (en) * | 1996-07-16 | 1999-02-02 | Oncor, Inc. | Nucleic acid amplification oligonucleotides with molecular energy transfer labels and methods based thereon |
US20060263810A1 (en) * | 1997-11-04 | 2006-11-23 | Bergeron Michel G | Species-specific, genus-specific and universal DNA probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial and fungal pathogens and associated antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US20040185478A1 (en) * | 1997-11-04 | 2004-09-23 | Bergeron Michel G. | Species-specific, genus-specific and universal DNA probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial and fungal pathogens and associated antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US20100267012A1 (en) * | 1997-11-04 | 2010-10-21 | Bergeron Michel G | Highly conserved genes and their use to generate probes and primers for detection of microorganisms |
US6037130A (en) * | 1998-07-28 | 2000-03-14 | The Public Health Institute Of The City Of New York, Inc. | Wavelength-shifting probes and primers and their use in assays and kits |
US6610836B1 (en) * | 1999-01-29 | 2003-08-26 | Genome Therapeutics Corporation | Nucleic acid amino acid sequences relating to Klebsiella pneumoniae for diagnostics and therapeutics |
US20090068641A1 (en) * | 1999-09-28 | 2009-03-12 | Bergeron Michel G | Highly conserved genes and their use to generate probes and primers for detection of microorganisms |
Cited By (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7943346B2 (en) | 1994-09-12 | 2011-05-17 | Geneohm Sciences Canada Inc. | Probes and primers for detection of bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes |
US20070009947A1 (en) * | 1994-09-12 | 2007-01-11 | Bergeron Michel G | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US20070105129A1 (en) * | 1994-09-12 | 2007-05-10 | Bergeron Michel G | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US20090053703A1 (en) * | 1994-09-12 | 2009-02-26 | Bergeron Michel G | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US20030180733A1 (en) * | 1994-09-12 | 2003-09-25 | Bergeron Michel G. | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US8426137B2 (en) | 1996-11-04 | 2013-04-23 | Genohm Sciences Canada, Inc. | Methods and probes for detecting a vancomycin resistance gene |
US20040185478A1 (en) * | 1997-11-04 | 2004-09-23 | Bergeron Michel G. | Species-specific, genus-specific and universal DNA probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial and fungal pathogens and associated antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US8034588B2 (en) | 1997-11-04 | 2011-10-11 | Geneohm Sciences Canada Inc. | Species-specific, genus-specific and universal DNA probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial and fungal pathogens and associated antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US8067207B2 (en) | 1997-11-04 | 2011-11-29 | Geneohm Sciences Canada Inc. | Species-specific, genus-specific and universal DNA probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial and fungal pathogens and associated antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for diagnosis in microbiology laboratories |
US10047404B2 (en) | 1999-09-28 | 2018-08-14 | Geneohm Sciences Canada, Inc. | Highly conserved tuf genes and their use to generate probes and primers for detection of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus |
US20090068641A1 (en) * | 1999-09-28 | 2009-03-12 | Bergeron Michel G | Highly conserved genes and their use to generate probes and primers for detection of microorganisms |
US8182996B2 (en) | 1999-09-28 | 2012-05-22 | Geneohm Sciences Canada Inc. | Compositions and methods for detecting Klebsiella pneumoniae |
US8114601B2 (en) | 1999-09-28 | 2012-02-14 | Geneohm Sciences Canada Inc. | Highly conserved genes and their use to generate probes and primers for detection of microorganisms |
US8532934B2 (en) * | 2007-01-25 | 2013-09-10 | Peter K. Rogan | Rapid and comprehensive identification of prokaryotic organisms by metagenomic analysis |
US20120058485A1 (en) * | 2007-01-25 | 2012-03-08 | Peter Kaith Rogan | Rapid and comprehensive identification of prokaryotic organisms (continuation) |
US8512954B2 (en) | 2007-04-19 | 2013-08-20 | Molecular Detection Inc. | Methods, compositions and kits for detection and analysis of antibiotic-resistant bacteria |
US20110151466A1 (en) * | 2007-04-19 | 2011-06-23 | Molecular Detection, Inc. | Methods, compositions and kits for detection and analysis of antibiotic-resistant bacteria |
US8362228B2 (en) | 2007-04-19 | 2013-01-29 | Molecular Detection, Inc. | Methods, compositions and kits for detection and analysis of antibiotic-resistant bacteria |
US8017337B2 (en) | 2007-04-19 | 2011-09-13 | Molecular Detection, Inc. | Methods, compositions and kits for detection and analysis of antibiotic-resistant bacteria |
US20090081663A1 (en) * | 2007-04-19 | 2009-03-26 | Molecular Detection Inc. | Methods, compositions and kits for detection and analysis of antibiotic-resistant bacteria |
US8557524B2 (en) | 2007-04-19 | 2013-10-15 | Molecular Detection Inc. | Methods, compositions and kits for detection and analysis of antibiotic-resistant bacteria |
US8557974B2 (en) | 2007-04-19 | 2013-10-15 | Molecular Detection Inc. | Methods, compositions and kits for detection and analysis of antibiotic-resistant bacteria |
US9074260B2 (en) | 2007-04-19 | 2015-07-07 | Molecular Detection Inc. | Methods, compositions and kits for detection and analysis of antibiotic-resistant bacteria |
US7888075B2 (en) | 2007-07-31 | 2011-02-15 | Quest Diagnostics Investments Incorporated | Detection of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus in biological samples |
US20090035780A1 (en) * | 2007-07-31 | 2009-02-05 | Mccarthy Larry | Detection of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus in biological samples |
US20110178721A1 (en) * | 2008-10-07 | 2011-07-21 | Opticul Diagnostics Ltd. | Means and methods for detecting antibiotic resistant bacteria in a sample |
US9365883B2 (en) | 2011-12-19 | 2016-06-14 | Opticul Diagnostics Ltd. | Spectroscopic means and methods for identifying microorganisms in culture |
CN106222252A (en) * | 2016-07-25 | 2016-12-14 | 中国水产科学研究院东海水产研究所 | Detect multiple PCR primer and the detection method of three kinds of integron related elements simultaneously |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20020055101A1 (en) | 2002-05-09 |
US20070009947A1 (en) | 2007-01-11 |
US20030180733A1 (en) | 2003-09-25 |
US20070105129A1 (en) | 2007-05-10 |
US7943346B2 (en) | 2011-05-17 |
US20090053703A1 (en) | 2009-02-26 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7943346B2 (en) | Probes and primers for detection of bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes | |
US20090053702A1 (en) | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories | |
CA2790915C (en) | Method, tools and kits for the detection of members of the streptococcus genus | |
US8067207B2 (en) | Species-specific, genus-specific and universal DNA probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial and fungal pathogens and associated antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for diagnosis in microbiology laboratories | |
AU775763B2 (en) | Species-specific, genus-specific and universal DNA probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial and fungal pathogens and associated antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for diagnosis in microbiology laboratories | |
AU705198C (en) | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories | |
MXPA01006838A (en) | Specific and universal probes and amplification primers to rapidly detect and identify common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes from clinical specimens for routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratories | |
MXPA99004119A (en) | Specie |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SGF SANTE INC., CANADA Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INFECTIO DIAGNOSTIC (I.D.I.) INC.;REEL/FRAME:014332/0633 Effective date: 20030128 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SGF SANTE INC., CANADA Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INFECTIO DIANOSTIC (I.D.I.) INC.;REEL/FRAME:014332/0246 Effective date: 20030407 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SGF SANTE INC., QUEBEC Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INFECTIO DIAGNOSTIC (I.D.I) INC.;REEL/FRAME:014402/0646 Effective date: 20030407 Owner name: BIOMERIEUX, INC., NORTH CAROLINA Free format text: CONFIRMATION OF LICENSE W/APPENDIX;ASSIGNOR:INFECTIO DIAGNOSTIC, INC. (I.D.I.);REEL/FRAME:014402/0619 Effective date: 20040223 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: INFECTO DIAGNOSTIC (I.D.I.) INC., CANADA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SGF SANTE INC.;REEL/FRAME:017400/0714 Effective date: 20051223 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GENEOHM SCIENCES CANADA INC., CANADA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:INFECTIO DIAGNOSTIC (I.D.I.) INC.;REEL/FRAME:020186/0621 Effective date: 20050907 Owner name: GENEOHM SCIENCES CANADA INC.,CANADA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:INFECTIO DIAGNOSTIC (I.D.I.) INC.;REEL/FRAME:020186/0621 Effective date: 20050907 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO PAY ISSUE FEE |