US20050013668A1 - Near shore port security barrier - Google Patents
Near shore port security barrier Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20050013668A1 US20050013668A1 US10/622,177 US62217703A US2005013668A1 US 20050013668 A1 US20050013668 A1 US 20050013668A1 US 62217703 A US62217703 A US 62217703A US 2005013668 A1 US2005013668 A1 US 2005013668A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- barrier
- fence
- floating
- pontoon
- wire mesh
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 230
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 13
- 229910000619 316 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 5
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000011152 fibreglass Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000002360 explosive Substances 0.000 description 12
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004880 explosion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009528 severe injury Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003351 stiffener Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910000975 Carbon steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 208000016113 North Carolina macular dystrophy Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010962 carbon steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005188 flotation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006260 foam Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003116 impacting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009191 jumping Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02B—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
- E02B15/00—Cleaning or keeping clear the surface of open water; Apparatus therefor
- E02B15/04—Devices for cleaning or keeping clear the surface of open water from oil or like floating materials by separating or removing these materials
- E02B15/08—Devices for reducing the polluted area with or without additional devices for removing the material
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02B—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
- E02B15/00—Cleaning or keeping clear the surface of open water; Apparatus therefor
- E02B15/04—Devices for cleaning or keeping clear the surface of open water from oil or like floating materials by separating or removing these materials
- E02B15/08—Devices for reducing the polluted area with or without additional devices for removing the material
- E02B15/085—Details of connectors
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02B—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
- E02B3/00—Engineering works in connection with control or use of streams, rivers, coasts, or other marine sites; Sealings or joints for engineering works in general
- E02B3/20—Equipment for shipping on coasts, in harbours or on other fixed marine structures, e.g. bollards
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H11/00—Defence installations; Defence devices
- F41H11/05—Net barriers for harbour defence
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to a security system which protects vessels docked in a port from being damage by explosive laden watercraft. More particularly, the present invention relates to an near shore port security barrier which utilizes a fixed fence structure attached to a floating barrier pontoon to protect ships docked at a port.
- Ocean going vessels docked at a port are vulnerable to by asymmetric threats, such as small watercraft laden with explosive or munitions. These threat watercraft can be pleasure boats or other commercially available watercraft which are difficult if not impossible to distinguish from other non-threatening watercraft. Because of the structure and layout of port facilities, it is not very difficult for a small hostile watercraft to pull alongside a moored vessel and then detonate explosives causing severe damage with little or no warning to personnel on board the vessel.
- port security barriers have been designed and deployed to protect the port facilities and not individual vessels by, for example positioning the barrier at the entrance to the port facility.
- Some the port security barriers are inexpensive, low freeboard, line of demarcation barriers that function to clearly mark restricted area within the port.
- Other more expensive security barriers provide a physical security barrier for the port facility but not for individual vessels within the facility in the event the barrier is penetrated.
- the present invention overcomes some of the disadvantages of the port security barriers utilized in the past in that it comprises a relatively simple design, and highly effective port security barrier which is adapted for use with a vessel to prevent damage to the vessel caused by an attack from an explosive laden watercraft. Since the near shore port security barrier is designed to be easily moved from one vessel to another vessel, the near shore port security barrier provides a substantial deterrence to an attack while the vessel is docked at a port facility.
- the near shore port security barrier comprises a wire mesh barrier fence supported by floating barrier modules, which are connected to one another. Each barrier module is approximately fifty feet in length and is designed to be connected in series to another module to provide for a continuous barrier of varying length depending upon the size of the vessel the barrier is protecting.
- the near shore port security barrier includes fixed fences and flexible fences on each floating barrier module which overlap with an adjoining module to ensure that the near shore port security barrier is continuous along its whole length and the length of the vessel.
- the flexible fences which are hinged use torsion bar spring assemblies that accommodate relative motion of the modules while keeping the fence material flush with the fence on an adjacent barrier module.
- the two floating barrier modules located at each end of the vessel have optional side fences that close the end of the near shore port security barrier against the vessel.
- Each floating barrier module has a pair of fenders designed to engage the hull of the vessel against which the barrier is deployed.
- the near shore port security barrier provides sufficient delay time for security forces to respond to the threat.
- the near shore port security barrier When an attacking watercraft attempts to force its way through the near shore port security barrier, the near shore port security barrier is designed to transfer the imposed loads through the near shore port security barrier structure and fendering to the ship or vessel or the mooring system for the near shore port security barrier.
- the near shore port security barrier When the attacking craft is filed with explosives the near shore port security barrier provides a minimum standoff distance to prevent catastrophic damage to critical ship systems.
- the combination of barrier material and standoff distance attenuates the effects of munitions and explosives when these explosive are used to attack a ship.
- the near shore port security barrier is modular so that the barrier material and standoff distance can be adjusted to meet specific existing or evolving threats.
- FIGS. 1-11 illustrate an embodiment of the modular structure of a near shore port security barrier used to protect vessel docked at port facility from attack by a hostile watercraft.
- the in near shore port security barrier 20 comprises a barrier which protects an ocean going vessel 22 from attack by a threat watercraft 24 while docked at a pier 26 at harbor facility or at a set distance from the pier 26 depending upon on a perceived threat (for example threat watercraft 24 ) and port characteristics.
- the threat watercraft 24 may be a pleasure boat or other small high speed vessel, which is laden with explosives or munitions that are detonated when the watercraft 24 is in proximity to vessel 22 . When the explosive materials aboard watercraft 24 are triggered severe damage to vessel 22 generally occurs.
- the near shore port security barrier 20 comprises a plurality of barrier modules 28 ( FIG. 3 ) which are fitted together in the manner illustrated in FIG. 4 .
- Each module includes fendering system 30 , which protects vessel 22 and near shore port security barrier 20 during normal port operations and also function to dissipate energy of any threat watercraft 24 attacking the barrier 20 .
- the fender 31 rest against the hull 23 of ocean going vessel 22 .
- a barrier floatation system/structure 32 which includes pontoons 34 and 36 function to absorb energy from the threat watercraft 24 .
- the location of a barrier fence/screen fence 38 on each barrier module 28 provides a relatively safe standoff distance from the protected vessel 22 that prevents attacking threat craft 24 from getting close enough to vessel 22 to cause catastrophic damage by detonating explosives or other munitions.
- the standoff distance can be varied to meet requirements for certain threat thresholds.
- the barrier material that serves to dissipate or attenuate the effects of an explosion can also be varied in accordance threat thresholds.
- the near shore port security barrier 20 and its modules 28 are designed for deployment and recovery by port work boats such as tugs to minimize the impact on daily port operations and productivity.
- FIG. 2 depicts the protected vessel 22 when the vessel 22 is moored in proximity to the near shore port security barrier 20 .
- Mooring lines 40 connected to barrier 20 and anchors 42 which rest on the ocean floor 44 are used to secure the barrier in a fixed position relative to vessel 22 in the manner illustrated in FIG. 2 .
- barrier fence/screen fence 38 for near shore port security barrier 20 comprises a synthetic or wire mesh fencing material 45 supported by a barrier fence support structure which is attached to and supported by outboard pontoon 34 as well as inboard pontoon 36 and cross members 47 and 48 which when assembled in the manner illustrated in FIG. 3 forms the barrier flotation system 32 for each of the modules 28 of near shore port security barrier 20 .
- Near shore port security barrier 20 includes a plurality of modules 28 fifty feet in length ( FIG. 4 ) which are designed to be connected to one another in series to provide for a continuous barrier of any desired length.
- the length of the barrier varies in accordance with the length of vessel 22 to be protected by barrier 20 .
- the vessel to be protected is an aircraft carrier which is approximately 1100 feet in length
- the barrier will consist of at least twenty two modules connected in series in the manner illustrated in FIG. 4 .
- a destroyer which is about five hundred feet in length, will require approximately ten modules 28 connected in series to protect the destroyer from a threat watercraft.
- each flexible fence 50 includes a pair of six foot high swing gates 54 and 56 which are hinged at a fence screen support post 52 by a plurality of hinges 58 .
- the upper gate 54 is longer than the lower gate 56 since the upper gate 54 must provide over a wider gap which will occur between adjoining modules 28 of the barrier 20 .
- the upper gate 54 has an overall length of 14 feet 6 inches, while the lower gate 56 has an overall length of 12 feet 6 inches.
- the rectangular shaped tubular support structure 66 for each swing gate 54 and 56 is fabricated from rectangular tubing.
- the structure 66 is trussed with a centrally located vertical pipe 68 and two diagonal tension bars 71 and 73 to assist each gate in retaining its rectangular shape.
- a pair of three-foot high screen panels 74 and 76 are attached by bolts to each swing gate 54 and 56 .
- near shore port security barrier 20 includes a plurality of identical barrier modules 28 which are buoyant, that is the barrier modules 28 float, and which are interchangeable.
- the port security barrier also has two end barrier modules 70 ( FIG. 7 ) which have unique fence configurations 72 .
- the modules 28 are connected end to end to form a long, segmented catamaran configuration.
- the modules are connected by a hook and shackle connector assembly 75 between the outboard pontoons 34 of adjacent modules, while a tension-only synthetic line strap 77 is used to connect the inboard pontoons 36 of adjacent modules 28 .
- Each barrier module 28 is provided with a pair of roller fenders 31 which are components of the fendering system 30 for near shore port security barrier 20 .
- the roller fenders 31 allow the modules to be moored against the side of vessel 22 without damaging the hull of vessel 22 .
- the outboard pontoon 34 is longer than the inboard pontoon 36 with the outboard pontoon 34 having an overall length of about 50 feet and the inboard pontoon having an overall length of about 38 feet.
- the cross members 47 and 48 for each module 28 are mounted on the mounted on the pontoons 34 and 36 about four inches clear of the water and secured to the pontoons by bolts to allow for transportation to and assembly of the near shore port security barrier 20 at the port facility.
- Each cross member 47 an 48 has a pair of lifting eyes 174 for movement of the cross member 47 or 48 .
- the inboard pontoon 36 for each barrier module 28 comprises a 36-inch diameter, 1 ⁇ 4′′ thick wall a-50 carbon steel pipe/tube 80 with elliptical ends 78 and measures 38 feet in length.
- Pontoon 36 includes two internal watertight ⁇ fraction (3/16) ⁇ ′′ bulkheads which form three watertight chambers within pontoon 3 .
- the tube 80 has internal stiffeners for cross member stubs which are used to secure the cross members 47 and 48 to pontoon 36 .
- Pontoon 36 includes 24′′ wide walkway gratings 83 which allow a user access to each module 28 for repairs.
- the two rolling fenders 31 for each module 28 are six feet in length and three feet in diameter and fabricated using an internal closed-cell rigid foam and an outer cover for wear resistance.
- the fenders include a four inch IPS Schedule-80 plastic pipe 84 which allow the fenders to rotate on a U-shaped mounting bracket 86 .
- the rolling fenders 31 are Sea Guard Foam-Filled Marine Fenders commercially available from Seaward of Clearbrook, Va.
- Mounting bracket 86 is a U-frame style bent consisting of two legs which offset the fenders 31 from the pontoon 36 and a longitudinal three inch IPS Schedule 80 stainless steel axle 88 which is in rotatable engagement with pipe 84 of fender 31 .
- Axle 88 is designed to transmit moments due to the side load on the fenders reducing the loads applied to the pontoon walls.
- fender 31 can be rotated in the direction of arrow 172 for storage.
- a crane is used to lift fender 31 upward to a vertical position and fender 31 is then pinned in place.
- Each bumper 82 has a foundation support structure for attaching the bumper to the elliptical ends 78 of pontoon 36 .
- a shackle 89 is also attached to each end 78 of pontoon 36 for the tension strap connectors 77 which are used to secure adjacent modules 28 to one another.
- Each pontoon 36 also has a pad eye 90 positioned at each end of the pontoon which is used to lift the pontoon for movement from one location to another.
- Cross members 47 and 48 comprise 14′′ ⁇ 10′′ ⁇ fraction (5/16) ⁇ ′′ rectangular tubing caped at each end. The cross members are watertight to provide damage stability and buoyancy. Each cross member 47 and 48 has end post foundations, towing eyes 92 for tow line 94 and a support structure for 24′′ wide fiberglass walkway grating. As shown in FIG. 3 only cross member 48 includes a walkway grating 96 .
- Outboard pontoon 34 is almost identical to inboard pontoon 36 except that its length is 48′-6′′, and it has four internal bulkheads forming five watertight compartments.
- outboard pontoon includes fence post foundations for the fence screen support post 100 , 102 , 104 , 106 , 108 and 52 ( FIG. 5 ).
- the fence screen support post 100 , 102 , 104 , 106 , and 108 are spaced nine feet apart.
- fence screen support post 108 is spaced apart from fence screen support post 52 by about thirty inches.
- Outboard pontoon 34 also has a fender 110 at one of its elliptical end 112 and a shackle 114 at its other elliptical end 116 .
- the shackle 114 engages a hook connector 118 on an adjacent pontoon which in conjunction with a line strap 77 secures one module 28 of barrier 20 to an adjacent module of barrier 20 .
- the hook and shackle connector assembly 75 includes hook connector 118 which is a machined high strength steel hook and shackle 114 which is a 55-ton shackle.
- Outboard pontoon 34 also has a 24-inch wide walkway grating 168 to allow user access to the pontoon and for fence repair. There are also cleats 122 positioned at each end of the pontoon which are used to facilitate pontoon movement. Outboard pontoon 34 also has a safety rail 170 which is shown in FIG. 11 .
- barrier fence/screen fence 38 is a vertical barrier that extends along the outboard side of near shore port security barrier 20 and along the forward and aft side of vessel 22 forming an elongated U shape around the vessel 22 .
- the barrier fence 38 extends vertically upward from the float structure for each module 28 to a height of 14′-6′′ above the water line.
- the wire mesh fencing material 45 is installed in a series of panels that are bolted to the fence screen support post 100 , 102 , 104 , 106 , 108 and 52 .
- the six foot high swing gates 54 and 56 are installed at the ends of the modules 28 to provide fencing coverage for the gap between modules 28 .
- Wind loads at right angles to the fence 38 are resisted by the strength of the fence post 100 , 102 , 104 , 106 , 108 and 52 .
- Off-axis loads are resisted by a truss network of tension and compression braces, designated generally by the reference numeral 120 .
- the fencing material 45 is installed in a panel fashion. The width of the material to four feet and the panels are installed horizontally. The upper three panels in the fixed fences 46 of each module 28 are four feet high and a fourth panel is installed at the bottom to the fill the gap between the upper panels and the outboard pontoon 34 . This gap is about two feet.
- the fence material 45 is 316 stainless steel wire mesh which eliminates corrosion maintenance.
- the fence post 100 , 102 , 104 , 106 , 108 and 52 are W 6 ⁇ 12# I-beam sections.
- the major axis for each fence post 100 , 102 , 104 , 106 , 108 and 52 is orientated to withstand lateral wind loads and each fence post includes flanges for bolting the screen panels to the fence post.
- the fence post 100 , 102 , 104 , 106 , 108 and 52 include a taper 122 at their bottom end for drop-in installation and are secured to the pontoon 34 by a single pin which prevents the fence post from jumping out of its foundation.
- the foundation for each fence post 100 , 102 , 14 , 106 , 108 and 52 includes a plate foundation backed up by a partial ring stiffener or watertight bulkhead inside the pontoon 34 .
- the barrier fence 72 on the end barrier modules 70 is supported by fence post 126 , 128 , 130 , 132 and 134 .
- the end barrier modules 70 are 14 feet 63 ⁇ 8 inches in height by 27 feet 11 inches in length.
- FIG. 11 illustrates the end barrier modules without a barrier fence, that the fence structure 72 is optional on the end barrier modules.
- the barrier fence 38 for each module 28 includes a plurality of compression braces 136 which are positioned between adjacent fence post at the top of barrier fence 38 . As shown in FIG. 8A , the compression braces 136 are connected to fence post 102 using bolts 142 and nuts 140 .
- compression braces 136 are also connected to fence post 100 , 104 , 106 , 108 and 52 of each module 28 using nuts and bolts in the manner depicted in FIG. 8A .
- the barrier fence 38 for each module 28 also includes a plurality of tension braces 138 which are positioned between adjacent fence post diagonally across the barrier fence 38 in the manner illustrated in FIG. 5 .
- the tension braces 138 for barrier fence 38 are provided with an attachment clevis 144 at the upper end and a turnbuckle 146 at their lower end.
- the turnbuckle 146 allows a user to adjust the tension on each tension brace.
- the tension braces are connected to the fence post 100 , 104 , 106 , 108 and 52 of each module 28 at the upper end of each fence post ( FIG. 8A ), the middle of each fence post ( FIG. 8B ) and the bottom end of each fence post ( FIG. 8C ).
- the tension and compression braces are generally 1 ⁇ 2′′ diameter rods that provide adequate strength for the barrier fence while substantially reducing weight and wind drag.
- the two end barrier modules 70 also have a statically determinate truss network.
- the barrier fence 72 for each module 70 includes a plurality of compression braces 148 which are positioned between adjacent fence post at the top of barrier fence 72 . Connection of the compression braces to the fence post is by nuts and bolts in the manner illustrated in FIG. 8A .
- the barrier fence 72 for each module 70 also includes a plurality of tension braces 150 which are positioned between adjacent fence post diagonally across the barrier fence 72 in the manner illustrated in FIG. 5 .
- the tension braces 150 for barrier fence 72 are provided with an attachment clevis at the upper end and a turnbuckle at their lower end to connect the tension braces to the fence post.
- FIG. 12 illustrates a block diagram of near shore port security barrier 20 in operation.
- Step 160 depicts a threat watercraft attacking a port facility such as the facility illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2 .
- Step 162 depicts the threat watercraft either impacting the barrier fence 38 of the near shore port security barrier 20 which stops the craft or bring the craft to a stop short of the near shore port security barrier 20 .
- Step 164 depicts the attenuation by the near shore port security barrier 20 of chemical energy due to an explosion of munitions or other explosive materials aboard the threat craft.
- Step 166 depicts the dissipation of kinetic energy from the threat watercraft by the barrier fence and support structure for near shore port security barrier 20 .
- the present invention comprises a new, unique and exceedingly useful port security barrier for protecting vessels dock at a port facility which constitutes a considerable improvement over the known prior art.
- Many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
- Revetment (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates generally to a security system which protects vessels docked in a port from being damage by explosive laden watercraft. More particularly, the present invention relates to an near shore port security barrier which utilizes a fixed fence structure attached to a floating barrier pontoon to protect ships docked at a port.
- 2. Description of the Prior Art
- Ocean going vessels docked at a port, whether commercial or military, are vulnerable to by asymmetric threats, such as small watercraft laden with explosive or munitions. These threat watercraft can be pleasure boats or other commercially available watercraft which are difficult if not impossible to distinguish from other non-threatening watercraft. Because of the structure and layout of port facilities, it is not very difficult for a small hostile watercraft to pull alongside a moored vessel and then detonate explosives causing severe damage with little or no warning to personnel on board the vessel.
- In the past, port security barriers have been designed and deployed to protect the port facilities and not individual vessels by, for example positioning the barrier at the entrance to the port facility. Some the port security barriers are inexpensive, low freeboard, line of demarcation barriers that function to clearly mark restricted area within the port. Other more expensive security barriers provide a physical security barrier for the port facility but not for individual vessels within the facility in the event the barrier is penetrated.
- Accordingly, there is a need for a portable port security barrier which may be used within a port facility to protect vessels from attack by hostile explosive laden watercraft.
- The present invention overcomes some of the disadvantages of the port security barriers utilized in the past in that it comprises a relatively simple design, and highly effective port security barrier which is adapted for use with a vessel to prevent damage to the vessel caused by an attack from an explosive laden watercraft. Since the near shore port security barrier is designed to be easily moved from one vessel to another vessel, the near shore port security barrier provides a substantial deterrence to an attack while the vessel is docked at a port facility.
- The near shore port security barrier comprises a wire mesh barrier fence supported by floating barrier modules, which are connected to one another. Each barrier module is approximately fifty feet in length and is designed to be connected in series to another module to provide for a continuous barrier of varying length depending upon the size of the vessel the barrier is protecting. The near shore port security barrier includes fixed fences and flexible fences on each floating barrier module which overlap with an adjoining module to ensure that the near shore port security barrier is continuous along its whole length and the length of the vessel.
- The flexible fences which are hinged use torsion bar spring assemblies that accommodate relative motion of the modules while keeping the fence material flush with the fence on an adjacent barrier module. The two floating barrier modules located at each end of the vessel have optional side fences that close the end of the near shore port security barrier against the vessel.
- Each floating barrier module has a pair of fenders designed to engage the hull of the vessel against which the barrier is deployed.
- When an attack from a hostile craft occurs and the attacker attempts to disconnect the barrier modules, the near shore port security barrier provides sufficient delay time for security forces to respond to the threat.
- When an attacking watercraft attempts to force its way through the near shore port security barrier, the near shore port security barrier is designed to transfer the imposed loads through the near shore port security barrier structure and fendering to the ship or vessel or the mooring system for the near shore port security barrier.
- When the attacking craft is filed with explosives the near shore port security barrier provides a minimum standoff distance to prevent catastrophic damage to critical ship systems. The combination of barrier material and standoff distance attenuates the effects of munitions and explosives when these explosive are used to attack a ship. The near shore port security barrier is modular so that the barrier material and standoff distance can be adjusted to meet specific existing or evolving threats.
-
FIGS. 1-11 illustrate an embodiment of the modular structure of a near shore port security barrier used to protect vessel docked at port facility from attack by a hostile watercraft. - Referring to
FIGS. 1-4 , the in near shoreport security barrier 20 comprises a barrier which protects anocean going vessel 22 from attack by athreat watercraft 24 while docked at apier 26 at harbor facility or at a set distance from thepier 26 depending upon on a perceived threat (for example threat watercraft 24) and port characteristics. Thethreat watercraft 24 may be a pleasure boat or other small high speed vessel, which is laden with explosives or munitions that are detonated when thewatercraft 24 is in proximity tovessel 22. When the explosive materials aboard watercraft 24 are triggered severe damage tovessel 22 generally occurs. - The near shore
port security barrier 20 comprises a plurality of barrier modules 28 (FIG. 3 ) which are fitted together in the manner illustrated inFIG. 4 . Each module includesfendering system 30, which protectsvessel 22 and near shoreport security barrier 20 during normal port operations and also function to dissipate energy of anythreat watercraft 24 attacking thebarrier 20. As shown inFIG. 1 , thefender 31 rest against thehull 23 ofocean going vessel 22. - When the near shore
port security barrier 20 is moored then the mooring combined with the added mass of a barrier floatation system/structure 32 which includespontoons threat watercraft 24. The location of a barrier fence/screen fence 38 on eachbarrier module 28 provides a relatively safe standoff distance from the protectedvessel 22 that prevents attackingthreat craft 24 from getting close enough tovessel 22 to cause catastrophic damage by detonating explosives or other munitions. The standoff distance can be varied to meet requirements for certain threat thresholds. The barrier material that serves to dissipate or attenuate the effects of an explosion can also be varied in accordance threat thresholds. - The near shore
port security barrier 20 and itsmodules 28 are designed for deployment and recovery by port work boats such as tugs to minimize the impact on daily port operations and productivity. -
FIG. 2 depicts the protectedvessel 22 when thevessel 22 is moored in proximity to the near shoreport security barrier 20.Mooring lines 40 connected tobarrier 20 andanchors 42 which rest on theocean floor 44 are used to secure the barrier in a fixed position relative tovessel 22 in the manner illustrated inFIG. 2 . - Referring to
FIGS. 1-5 , barrier fence/screen fence 38 for near shoreport security barrier 20 comprises a synthetic or wiremesh fencing material 45 supported by a barrier fence support structure which is attached to and supported byoutboard pontoon 34 as well asinboard pontoon 36 andcross members FIG. 3 forms thebarrier flotation system 32 for each of themodules 28 of near shoreport security barrier 20. - Near shore
port security barrier 20 includes a plurality ofmodules 28 fifty feet in length (FIG. 4 ) which are designed to be connected to one another in series to provide for a continuous barrier of any desired length. The length of the barrier varies in accordance with the length ofvessel 22 to be protected bybarrier 20. For example, if the vessel to be protected is an aircraft carrier which is approximately 1100 feet in length, the barrier will consist of at least twenty two modules connected in series in the manner illustrated inFIG. 4 . A destroyer, which is about five hundred feet in length, will require approximately tenmodules 28 connected in series to protect the destroyer from a threat watercraft. - Referring to
FIGS. 5, 6A and 6B, theflexible fences 50 on eachmodule 28 overlap with an adjoining module to ensure that near shoreport security barrier 20 is continuous along its whole length and the length ofvessel 22. Eachflexible fence 50 includes a pair of six foothigh swing gates screen support post 52 by a plurality ofhinges 58. Theupper gate 54 is longer than thelower gate 56 since theupper gate 54 must provide over a wider gap which will occur betweenadjoining modules 28 of thebarrier 20. Theupper gate 54 has an overall length of 14 feet 6 inches, while thelower gate 56 has an overall length of 12 feet 6 inches. - At this time it should be noted that the
individual modules 28 of near shoreport security barrier 20 respond to waves moving relative to each other in roll and pitch and to a lesser extent in yaw. This creates a changing triangular gap between thefixed fences 46 of eachmodule 28.Swing gates fences 46 for eachbarrier module 28. - With
gates fence 46 of the adjoiningmodule 28. Two torsion bar spring assemblies 60, one for eachswing gate swing gate port security barrier 20 in the manner illustrated inFIG. 5 .Wear pads 64 are installed onpost 62 to accommodate the relative lateral motion of adjoiningmodules 28 under spring loading. - The rectangular shaped
tubular support structure 66 for eachswing gate structure 66 is trussed with a centrally locatedvertical pipe 68 and twodiagonal tension bars high screen panels swing gate - Referring to
FIGS. 1, 2 , 3, 4 and 7, near shoreport security barrier 20 includes a plurality ofidentical barrier modules 28 which are buoyant, that is thebarrier modules 28 float, and which are interchangeable. The port security barrier also has two end barrier modules 70 (FIG. 7 ) which haveunique fence configurations 72. As shown inFIG. 4 , themodules 28 are connected end to end to form a long, segmented catamaran configuration. The modules are connected by a hook and shackleconnector assembly 75 between theoutboard pontoons 34 of adjacent modules, while a tension-onlysynthetic line strap 77 is used to connect theinboard pontoons 36 ofadjacent modules 28. - Each
barrier module 28 is provided with a pair ofroller fenders 31 which are components of thefendering system 30 for near shoreport security barrier 20. Theroller fenders 31 allow the modules to be moored against the side ofvessel 22 without damaging the hull ofvessel 22. - The
outboard pontoon 34 is longer than theinboard pontoon 36 with theoutboard pontoon 34 having an overall length of about 50 feet and the inboard pontoon having an overall length of about 38 feet. Thecross members module 28 are mounted on the mounted on thepontoons port security barrier 20 at the port facility. Eachcross member 47 an 48 has a pair of liftingeyes 174 for movement of thecross member - The
inboard pontoon 36 for eachbarrier module 28 comprises a 36-inch diameter, ¼″ thick wall a-50 carbon steel pipe/tube 80 withelliptical ends 78 andmeasures 38 feet in length.Pontoon 36 includes two internal watertight {fraction (3/16)}″ bulkheads which form three watertight chambers within pontoon 3. Thetube 80 has internal stiffeners for cross member stubs which are used to secure thecross members pontoon 36. There are also pontoon fenders/bumpers 82 at each end which are designed to protect thepontoon 36.Pontoon 36 includes 24″wide walkway gratings 83 which allow a user access to eachmodule 28 for repairs. - Referring to
FIG. 3 , the two rollingfenders 31 for eachmodule 28 are six feet in length and three feet in diameter and fabricated using an internal closed-cell rigid foam and an outer cover for wear resistance. The fenders include a four inch IPS Schedule-80plastic pipe 84 which allow the fenders to rotate on aU-shaped mounting bracket 86. The rollingfenders 31 are Sea Guard Foam-Filled Marine Fenders commercially available from Seaward of Clearbrook, Va. - Mounting
bracket 86 is a U-frame style bent consisting of two legs which offset thefenders 31 from thepontoon 36 and a longitudinal threeinch IPS Schedule 80stainless steel axle 88 which is in rotatable engagement withpipe 84 offender 31.Axle 88 is designed to transmit moments due to the side load on the fenders reducing the loads applied to the pontoon walls. - As shown in
FIG. 11 ,fender 31 can be rotated in the direction ofarrow 172 for storage. A crane is used to liftfender 31 upward to a vertical position andfender 31 is then pinned in place. - Each
bumper 82 has a foundation support structure for attaching the bumper to the elliptical ends 78 ofpontoon 36. Ashackle 89 is also attached to eachend 78 ofpontoon 36 for thetension strap connectors 77 which are used to secureadjacent modules 28 to one another. - Each
pontoon 36 also has apad eye 90 positioned at each end of the pontoon which is used to lift the pontoon for movement from one location to another. -
Cross members cross member eyes 92 fortow line 94 and a support structure for 24″ wide fiberglass walkway grating. As shown inFIG. 3 only cross member 48 includes a walkway grating 96. -
Outboard pontoon 34 is almost identical toinboard pontoon 36 except that its length is 48′-6″, and it has four internal bulkheads forming five watertight compartments. outboard pontoon includes fence post foundations for the fencescreen support post FIG. 5 ). The fencescreen support post screen support post 108 is spaced apart from fencescreen support post 52 by about thirty inches. -
Outboard pontoon 34 also has afender 110 at one of itselliptical end 112 and ashackle 114 at its otherelliptical end 116. Theshackle 114 engages ahook connector 118 on an adjacent pontoon which in conjunction with aline strap 77 secures onemodule 28 ofbarrier 20 to an adjacent module ofbarrier 20. The hook and shackleconnector assembly 75 includeshook connector 118 which is a machined high strength steel hook and shackle 114 which is a 55-ton shackle. There is also afender 117 located atelliptical end 116 ofpontoon 34. - Cross member connection stubs are provided to attach
Cross members outboard pontoon 34.Outboard pontoon 34 also has a 24-inch wide walkway grating 168 to allow user access to the pontoon and for fence repair. There are alsocleats 122 positioned at each end of the pontoon which are used to facilitate pontoon movement.Outboard pontoon 34 also has asafety rail 170 which is shown inFIG. 11 . - Referring again to
FIGS. 1-5 , barrier fence/screen fence 38 is a vertical barrier that extends along the outboard side of near shoreport security barrier 20 and along the forward and aft side ofvessel 22 forming an elongated U shape around thevessel 22. Thebarrier fence 38 extends vertically upward from the float structure for eachmodule 28 to a height of 14′-6″ above the water line. The wiremesh fencing material 45 is installed in a series of panels that are bolted to the fencescreen support post high swing gates modules 28 to provide fencing coverage for the gap betweenmodules 28. Wind loads at right angles to thefence 38 are resisted by the strength of thefence post reference numeral 120. - The
fencing material 45 is installed in a panel fashion. The width of the material to four feet and the panels are installed horizontally. The upper three panels in the fixedfences 46 of eachmodule 28 are four feet high and a fourth panel is installed at the bottom to the fill the gap between the upper panels and theoutboard pontoon 34. This gap is about two feet. Thefence material 45 is 316 stainless steel wire mesh which eliminates corrosion maintenance. - The
fence post fence post fence post taper 122 at their bottom end for drop-in installation and are secured to thepontoon 34 by a single pin which prevents the fence post from jumping out of its foundation. The foundation for eachfence post pontoon 34. - Referring to
FIG. 7 , thebarrier fence 72 on theend barrier modules 70 is supported byfence post end barrier modules 70 are 14 feet 6⅜ inches in height by 27feet 11 inches in length.FIG. 11 illustrates the end barrier modules without a barrier fence, that thefence structure 72 is optional on the end barrier modules. - Referring to
FIGS. 5 and 8 A-8C, since thefence post module 28 are weak laterally and torsionally a system of tension and compression braces is included in the design of thebarrier fence 38 to form a statically determinate truss network. Thebarrier fence 38 for eachmodule 28 includes a plurality of compression braces 136 which are positioned between adjacent fence post at the top ofbarrier fence 38. As shown inFIG. 8A , the compression braces 136 are connected tofence post 102 usingbolts 142 and nuts 140. - At this time it should be noted that compression braces 136 are also connected to
fence post module 28 using nuts and bolts in the manner depicted inFIG. 8A . - The
barrier fence 38 for eachmodule 28 also includes a plurality of tension braces 138 which are positioned between adjacent fence post diagonally across thebarrier fence 38 in the manner illustrated inFIG. 5 . The tension braces 138 forbarrier fence 38 are provided with anattachment clevis 144 at the upper end and a turnbuckle 146 at their lower end. Theturnbuckle 146 allows a user to adjust the tension on each tension brace. The tension braces are connected to thefence post module 28 at the upper end of each fence post (FIG. 8A ), the middle of each fence post (FIG. 8B ) and the bottom end of each fence post (FIG. 8C ). - Since the
fence post module 28 are weak laterally and torsionally a system of tension braces 138 and compression braces 136 is included in the design of thebarrier fence 38 to form a statically determinate truss network. - The tension and compression braces are generally ½″ diameter rods that provide adequate strength for the barrier fence while substantially reducing weight and wind drag.
- Referring to
FIG. 7 , the twoend barrier modules 70 also have a statically determinate truss network. Thebarrier fence 72 for eachmodule 70 includes a plurality of compression braces 148 which are positioned between adjacent fence post at the top ofbarrier fence 72. Connection of the compression braces to the fence post is by nuts and bolts in the manner illustrated inFIG. 8A . - The
barrier fence 72 for eachmodule 70 also includes a plurality of tension braces 150 which are positioned between adjacent fence post diagonally across thebarrier fence 72 in the manner illustrated inFIG. 5 . The tension braces 150 forbarrier fence 72 are provided with an attachment clevis at the upper end and a turnbuckle at their lower end to connect the tension braces to the fence post. -
FIG. 12 illustrates a block diagram of near shoreport security barrier 20 in operation. Step 160 depicts a threat watercraft attacking a port facility such as the facility illustrated inFIGS. 1 and 2 . Step 162 depicts the threat watercraft either impacting thebarrier fence 38 of the near shoreport security barrier 20 which stops the craft or bring the craft to a stop short of the near shoreport security barrier 20. Step 164 depicts the attenuation by the near shoreport security barrier 20 of chemical energy due to an explosion of munitions or other explosive materials aboard the threat craft. Step 166 depicts the dissipation of kinetic energy from the threat watercraft by the barrier fence and support structure for near shoreport security barrier 20. - From the foregoing, it may readily be seen that the present invention comprises a new, unique and exceedingly useful port security barrier for protecting vessels dock at a port facility which constitutes a considerable improvement over the known prior art. Many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/622,177 US6843197B1 (en) | 2003-07-17 | 2003-07-17 | Near shore port security barrier |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/622,177 US6843197B1 (en) | 2003-07-17 | 2003-07-17 | Near shore port security barrier |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US6843197B1 US6843197B1 (en) | 2005-01-18 |
US20050013668A1 true US20050013668A1 (en) | 2005-01-20 |
Family
ID=33565185
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/622,177 Expired - Lifetime US6843197B1 (en) | 2003-07-17 | 2003-07-17 | Near shore port security barrier |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6843197B1 (en) |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070193213A1 (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2007-08-23 | Lakdas Nanayakkara | Blast protective barrier system |
US20080101871A1 (en) * | 2006-10-25 | 2008-05-01 | Wilcox Paul E | Floating platform and method of constructing the same |
US20100239374A1 (en) * | 2006-08-02 | 2010-09-23 | Davis Gregory A | Protective marine barrier system |
US20120091412A1 (en) * | 2010-10-14 | 2012-04-19 | Justin Bishop | Security barrier system |
US8739725B2 (en) | 2011-09-01 | 2014-06-03 | Halo Maritime Defense Systems, Inc. | Marine barrier gate |
US8801327B2 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2014-08-12 | Halo Maritime Defense Systems, Inc. | Marine ropeway |
RU171685U1 (en) * | 2017-03-30 | 2017-06-09 | Акционерное общество "Научно-производственный комплекс "Дедал" | Obstacle engineering obstacle |
US10145659B1 (en) | 2017-08-25 | 2018-12-04 | Halo Maritime Defense Systems, Inc. | Rapidly deployable single net capture marine barrier system |
US11414165B2 (en) * | 2019-10-21 | 2022-08-16 | Halo Maritime Defense Systems, Inc. | Compliant net support system for marine barriers |
US11686557B2 (en) | 2020-06-19 | 2023-06-27 | Halo Maritime Defense Systems, Inc. | Compliant single net marine barrier |
Families Citing this family (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7140599B1 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2006-11-28 | Richard Spink | Coupling systems and methods for marine barriers |
US20060216116A1 (en) * | 2005-03-22 | 2006-09-28 | Innovation Technology Application, Inc. | Floating protection barrier gate |
US20090217811A1 (en) * | 2006-01-17 | 2009-09-03 | David William Leeming | Textile armour |
US20070217867A1 (en) * | 2006-03-15 | 2007-09-20 | Son Rae S | Floating barriers for retaining substances in confined area, and barrier systems usable for treating oil spill in the water and for other applications |
US7401565B2 (en) * | 2006-11-06 | 2008-07-22 | United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Port security barrier |
NL2000406C2 (en) * | 2006-12-22 | 2008-06-24 | Tno | Method and device for protecting objects against rocket-driven grenades (RPGs). |
US20080193222A1 (en) * | 2007-02-14 | 2008-08-14 | Kroecker Stephan V | Maritime Port and Anti-Terrorism Data Gateway With Ingress And Egress Control |
US20080260467A1 (en) * | 2007-04-20 | 2008-10-23 | Kroecker Stephan V | Maritime Port and Anti-Terrorist Data Gateway With Ingress and Egress Control |
US7744313B2 (en) * | 2007-08-02 | 2010-06-29 | Terai Jeffrey B | Fixed security barrier |
US8928480B2 (en) * | 2010-03-19 | 2015-01-06 | David Iffergan | Reinforced marine optic fiber security fence |
US8182175B2 (en) * | 2010-03-19 | 2012-05-22 | David Iffergan | Gate for marine optic fiber security fence |
US8537011B2 (en) | 2010-03-19 | 2013-09-17 | David Iffergan | Marine optic fiber security fence |
US20150165596A1 (en) * | 2013-10-16 | 2015-06-18 | Truston Technologies, Inc. | Strap and Tensioning Mechanism for Attaching Flotation Modules to Marine Structures, namely Port Security Barriers (PSBs) |
US10378862B2 (en) | 2017-11-03 | 2019-08-13 | Harbor Offshore, Inc. | Security and debris barrier |
CN108387145A (en) * | 2018-02-01 | 2018-08-10 | 大工科创船海工程研究院(大连)有限公司 | A double-layer protective wall type water arresting device based on a spring buffer |
CN108387144A (en) * | 2018-02-01 | 2018-08-10 | 大工科创船海工程研究院(大连)有限公司 | A double-layer protective wall-type water arresting device based on hinged bracket support |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1151607A (en) * | 1915-04-10 | 1915-08-31 | Garwood Company | Protection against torpedoes, &c. |
US1295818A (en) * | 1917-12-17 | 1919-02-25 | Leo Byron Trask | Submarine-protecting device. |
US1299243A (en) * | 1917-09-05 | 1919-04-01 | Harry S Sheransky | Torpedo and mine defense for vessels. |
US1309391A (en) * | 1919-07-08 | Planooraph co | ||
US1326156A (en) * | 1919-12-23 | Apparatus for detecting and indicating the presence of submarine boats | ||
US2395944A (en) * | 1942-03-16 | 1946-03-05 | Peter P Smith | System for the protection of vessels against attack of torpedoes |
US6681709B1 (en) * | 2003-03-12 | 2004-01-27 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Port security barrier system |
-
2003
- 2003-07-17 US US10/622,177 patent/US6843197B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1309391A (en) * | 1919-07-08 | Planooraph co | ||
US1326156A (en) * | 1919-12-23 | Apparatus for detecting and indicating the presence of submarine boats | ||
US1151607A (en) * | 1915-04-10 | 1915-08-31 | Garwood Company | Protection against torpedoes, &c. |
US1299243A (en) * | 1917-09-05 | 1919-04-01 | Harry S Sheransky | Torpedo and mine defense for vessels. |
US1295818A (en) * | 1917-12-17 | 1919-02-25 | Leo Byron Trask | Submarine-protecting device. |
US2395944A (en) * | 1942-03-16 | 1946-03-05 | Peter P Smith | System for the protection of vessels against attack of torpedoes |
US6681709B1 (en) * | 2003-03-12 | 2004-01-27 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Port security barrier system |
Cited By (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7571577B2 (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2009-08-11 | Lakdas Nanayakkara | Blast protective barrier system |
US20070193213A1 (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2007-08-23 | Lakdas Nanayakkara | Blast protective barrier system |
US20100239374A1 (en) * | 2006-08-02 | 2010-09-23 | Davis Gregory A | Protective marine barrier system |
US8007202B2 (en) | 2006-08-02 | 2011-08-30 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Protective marine barrier system |
US20080101871A1 (en) * | 2006-10-25 | 2008-05-01 | Wilcox Paul E | Floating platform and method of constructing the same |
US7708497B2 (en) * | 2006-10-25 | 2010-05-04 | Waterfront Construction, Inc. | Floating platform and method of constructing the same |
US20120091412A1 (en) * | 2010-10-14 | 2012-04-19 | Justin Bishop | Security barrier system |
US8695947B2 (en) * | 2010-10-14 | 2014-04-15 | Halo Maritime Defense Systems | Security barrier system |
US8801327B2 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2014-08-12 | Halo Maritime Defense Systems, Inc. | Marine ropeway |
US8739725B2 (en) | 2011-09-01 | 2014-06-03 | Halo Maritime Defense Systems, Inc. | Marine barrier gate |
US8920075B2 (en) | 2011-09-01 | 2014-12-30 | Halo Maritime Defense Systems, Inc. | Marine barrier and gate |
US9121153B2 (en) | 2011-09-01 | 2015-09-01 | Haol Maritime Defense Systems | Marine barrier gate |
RU171685U1 (en) * | 2017-03-30 | 2017-06-09 | Акционерное общество "Научно-производственный комплекс "Дедал" | Obstacle engineering obstacle |
US10145659B1 (en) | 2017-08-25 | 2018-12-04 | Halo Maritime Defense Systems, Inc. | Rapidly deployable single net capture marine barrier system |
US11414165B2 (en) * | 2019-10-21 | 2022-08-16 | Halo Maritime Defense Systems, Inc. | Compliant net support system for marine barriers |
US11686557B2 (en) | 2020-06-19 | 2023-06-27 | Halo Maritime Defense Systems, Inc. | Compliant single net marine barrier |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6843197B1 (en) | 2005-01-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6843197B1 (en) | Near shore port security barrier | |
USRE40616E1 (en) | Port security barrier system | |
US7401565B2 (en) | Port security barrier | |
US6877456B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for protecting ships and harbors from attack by vessels | |
US7744313B2 (en) | Fixed security barrier | |
US7731452B2 (en) | Floating barrier units | |
US7887254B2 (en) | Wave attenuator and security barrier system-adjustor | |
US7351008B2 (en) | Floating barrier units | |
EP2435297B1 (en) | Watercraft immobilizing apparatus and system | |
US10215540B2 (en) | Open water marine barrier systems | |
US10378862B2 (en) | Security and debris barrier | |
NZ534886A (en) | Swing mooring pontoon | |
WO2005113330A1 (en) | Systems and methods for protecting ship from attack on the surface or under water | |
US20170183070A1 (en) | Watercraft immobilizing apparatus and system | |
US10502533B2 (en) | Marine barrier systems | |
US20030136325A1 (en) | Barrier unit structures | |
EP2041369B1 (en) | Berthing system and structure for use therein | |
RU156729U1 (en) | ANTI-BOAT BON BOOT | |
WO2015001322A1 (en) | Defence system for water based vehicles and platforms | |
RU153172U1 (en) | FLOATING BOAM BOOT CLOCK SECTION | |
WO2004096637A1 (en) | Security barrier unit__________________________________________ | |
US20050277344A1 (en) | Floating berth system and method | |
US10364008B2 (en) | Watercraft immobilizing apparatus and system | |
CN116142392A (en) | A floating anti-collision guardrail and its device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, VIRGINIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:NIXON, LAURENCE G.;SLAUGHTER, STEPHEN;TAYLOR, ROBERT J.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:014314/0660 Effective date: 20030711 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SECRETARY OF THE NAVY AS REPRESENTED BY THE UNITED Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SLAUGHTER, STEPHEN;REEL/FRAME:014945/0855 Effective date: 20040120 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |