US20030203816A1

US20030203816A1 - Titania-coated honeycomb catalyst matrix for UV-photocatalytic oxidation of organic pollutants, and process for making

Info

Publication number: US20030203816A1
Application number: US10/431,210
Authority: US
Inventors: Joseph Sangiovanni; Zissis Dardas
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: Individual
Priority date: 2001-02-26
Filing date: 2003-05-07
Publication date: 2003-10-30
Also published as: US6649561B2; US20020160913A1

Abstract

A titania-coated honeycomb catalyst matrix is provided for the ultraviolet-photocatalytic oxidation of organic pollutants in a flowing fluid. A honeycomb-shaped skeletal structure (12) has a thin, lightweight substrate (18) of metal or ceramic, typically an aluminum alloy, and a surface coating (20) of photocatalyst, such as titania. The photocatalyst (20) is bonded to the substrate (18) via a thin oxide layer (18′) on the substrate. The oxide layer (18′) may be grown on the substrate. The photocatalyst coating (20) is made by mixing (30) titania powder in a TiO₂sol-gel to form a titania slurry. The substrate with oxide layer is coated (30) with the titania slurry and then heat treated (31). The photocatalyst coating (20) is typically applied to substrate sheets (40, 60, 62) preformed for assembly into a honeycomb-shaped skeletal structure (12) having an array of parallel cells (46, 46′). The coated sheets (40) may have troughs (42) and crests (42), and be stacked (34) with intermediate parting sheets (48).

Alternatively, the coated sheets (60, 62) may be notched (64) and interfitted in “eggcrate” fashion. The honeycomb-shaped structure (12) is housed in a frame (50), and one or more stabilizer members (52) fastened to the frame serve to limit displacement of the structure as may be caused by the flowing fluid (14).

Description

This application is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/792,982 filed Feb. 26, 2001.[0001]

TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to the removal of organic pollutants from a fluid stream, and particularly to a structure for the photocatalytic oxidation of such pollutants and to the method of making such structure.

BACKGROUND ART

It is now relatively well known that a photocatalytic process may be used to cleanse a fluid stream, typically an air stream, of organic pollutants. A photocatalyst, such as titania (TiO ₂, titanium dioxide), may be supported on some form of skeletal, or support, structure to provide a catalyst matrix for photochemical activation and cleansing interaction with organic contaminants in the fluid stream. A source of ultraviolet illumination serves to activate the photocatalyst. This type of air purifier may find use in a number of applications, and particularly in an enclosed environment such as a room or the interior of a vehicle. Recent focus has been on the use of such purifiers in buildings, automobiles and aircraft.

Numerous formulations of photocatalysts, as well as the process for their application and adherence to supporting substrates, have been disclosed. Moreover, numerous configurations and materials have been disclosed and/or used for the support of photocatalyst material. Examples of such formulations and/or structures may be found in the following patent publications, including PCT published application WO 96/37280 for PCT Application US96/05103 assigned to the assignee of the present application, as well as U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,063,343; 5,993,738; 5,993,702; 5,854,169; 5,849,200; 5,835,840; 5,790;934; 5,616,532; 5,126,111; 5,032,241; 4,966,759; and 4,892,712.

Typically, the preferred photocatalyst is a coating of TiO ₂on a supporting substrate of any of various materials having various geometries. In some instances, the supporting substrates are meshes of fiberglass or similar material, e.g., ceramic and metallic foams, whereas in others they are fins or honeycomb-type structures. With respect to mesh-type substrates, a large fraction of the supported catalyst is essentially inactive because the inherent structure of these materials obscures the necessary ultraviolet illumination. Moreover, there may be difficulty in obtaining a uniformity or consistency of flow characteristics from one unit to another because of the amorphous or random nature of fluid passages in meshes, particularly after being coated with a photocatalyst. Fin-type supporting structures may be arranged to provide more uniform characteristics, but are often complex in their manufacture and assembly. Moreover, some such fin or honeycomb-type supporting structures have been of paper or ceramics, but paper has the limitations of low structural integrity and relatively short lifetime, and many of the ceramics may have a relatively high manufacturing cost, excessive weight and low mechanical durability due to brittleness. Moreover, the materials used in some such supporting structures and/or their assembly may give rise to the release of objectionable volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during operation.

In addition to the considerations about the suitability of the structural support, there is the further concern regarding the formulation and application of the photocatalyst to the selected structural support. The photocatalyst coating must posses the desired catalytic properties, while also being relatively economical to formulate, apply and continue to use. In this latter regard, it is important that the photocatalyst form a durable bond with the supporting substrate to prevent transfer of catalyst to the fluid stream being processed.

Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide a structural support for a photocatalyst which is of relatively low cost, light weight, high structural integrity, possesses good flow characteristics, and can be illuminated effectively by an external ultraviolet source.

It is a further object of the invention to provide a photocatalytic coating for such structural support which is adherent, durable, and possesses good photocatalytic properties.

It is a still further object of the invention to provide a photocatalyst and support therefore, which are not themselves a source of VOCs during operation.

DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION

The present invention provides an improved honeycomb photocatalyst matrix for purifying fluid flowing therethrough. The honeycomb photocatalyst matrix comprises a honeycomb-shaped skeletal structure of lightweight material, possibly a ceramic or more typically a metal, such as aluminum, formed or assembled as an array of multiple, substantially parallel cells open at opposite ends for fluid flow therethrough and illumination therewithin, the cells having respective surfaces, and a coating of photocatalyst on the surfaces of the cells, whereby the coated surfaces are activated by ultraviolet illumination to remove contaminants from fluid flowing through the cells.

The honeycomb-shaped skeletal structure of one embodiment is formed of a plurality of metal sheets, each having an alternating series of crests and troughs, and the sheets are stacked such that the crests and troughs form the respective cells. Planar metal parting sheets may be interposed between the sheets having troughs and crests. The metal is preferably aluminum, and may be about 0.002 inch in thickness.

In another embodiment, the metal sheets which define the cells are planar, and a portion of the sheets are oriented orthogonally to and interfitted with the remainder of the sheets, in substantially eggcrate fashion, to define the cells.

A frame is included about the outer perimeter of the honeycomb-shaped skeletal structure to maintain stability transverse to fluid flow, and one or more stabilizer members joined with the frame serve to resist displacement of the structure relative to the frame in the direction of fluid flow. The stabilizer members may be adjacent to one, or both, end faces of the cell structure, or may extend therethrough. The entire structural assembly is made without including volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as structural or bonding materials, since VOCs degrade when exposed to ultraviolet light.

A durable, adherent, photocatalytic coating is provided on the substrate material via the use of a ceramic interface material to promote adhesion of the photocatalyst. Although the substrate may itself be a, or the, ceramic material that provides such interface, the use of a thin metal sheet substrate (such as aluminum) having a ceramic layer formed thereon is preferred. Prior to coating, the aluminum sheets are provided with a ceramic oxide layer on one or both surfaces. The oxide layer may be grown or native. Titania powder is then mixed in a TiO ₂sol-gel solution to form a titania slurry. The oxidized surfaces of the aluminum substrate are coated with the titania slurry, and the coated substrate is then heat treated to calcine, harden, and bond the titania coating to the substrate.

The foregoing features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent in light of the following detailed description of exemplary embodiments thereof as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a simplified diagrammatic top view of a photocatalytic fluid purifier employing photocatalytic honeycomb monoliths in general accordance with the invention; [0016]
FIG. 2 is a graphic sectional view of a single substrate sheet and photocatalyst coating according to an aspect of the invention as employed in the photocatalyst honeycomb monoliths of another aspect of the invention; [0017]
FIG. 3 is a simplified manufacturing process flow diagram for the photocatalytic honeycomb monoliths of the invention; [0018]
FIG. 4 is an exploded diagrammatic perspective view illustrating one embodiment of the photocatalyst-coated structural core members of the invention; [0019]
FIG. 5 is an exploded diagrammatic perspective view illustrating another embodiment of the photocatalyst-coated structural core members of the invention; and [0020]
FIGS. 6A through 6D are diagrammatic perspective views of the photocatalyst-coated structural cores assembled as monoliths, or modules, including frames and reinforcing members in accordance with respective differing embodiments. [0021]

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

Referring to FIG. 1, there is depicted a [0022] photocatalytic fluid purifier 10 having photocatalytic honeycomb monoliths 12 in accordance with the invention. The purifier 10 is used to remove organic contaminants from a fluid stream using the known process of a photocatalytic reaction. In the illustrated embodiment, the fluid stream is air, though it might be other gases and/or liquids. This technology is effective at converting harmful volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to generally non-toxic compounds via photocatalytic oxidation, and is also effective at killing bioaerosols. The purifier 10 may be used in a number of generally enclosed environments, such as rooms and vehicles, but the illustrated embodiment will be discussed in the context of use for purifying air for an aircraft cabin. In such instance, size, weight, durability, etc. may take on added significance.
Air flows through the [0023] purifier 10 in the direction illustrated by arrow 14. Essentially, organic pollutants in the air stream 14 contact and adsorb on a photocatalytic semiconductor (hereinafter “photocatalyst”) in the monoliths 12. The photocatalyst is activated by ultra-violet (UV) illumination from the array of UV lamps 16 arranged adjacent to, or between, the photocatalytic honeycomb monoliths 12. Water molecules, which also adsorb on the photocatalyst surface, dissociate to form hydroxyl radicals which oxidize the organic pollutants adsorbed on the photocatalytic coating.
In the illustrated embodiment, the [0024] honeycomb monoliths 12 at opposite ends of purifier 10 have only ½ the thickness, or depth, D, of the intermediate monolith(s) 12 because they are only illuminated from one side, whereas the intermediate monolith(s) receive illumination from both sides to twice the cumulative depth. In the example, honeycomb monolith thickness, or depth D, is about 1 inch, the width, W, of the purifier 10 is about 32 inches, successive honeycomb monoliths 12 are spaced, S, about 4.5 inches, and the total length, L, of the purifier 10 is about 11 inches. The height (not seen) of the active face of the purifier 10 is about 23 inches. It will be understood that dimensions W, L, and H are variables depending on the fluid flow rate and specific applications. Dimension S can vary from slightly more than the diameter of lamp 16 to about 6 inches, depending on the power supplied to the lamps. Only dimension D is relatively fixed at 1 inch or ½ inch for optimum performance.
Referring to FIG. 2, there is depicted an enlarged graphic sectional view of a [0025] substrate 18 and photocatalytic coating 20 in accordance with an aspect of the invention. The substrate 18 is preferably lightweight, durable and not a source of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Moreover, the substrate 18 must be conducive to the existence or placement of an adherent oxide layer or coating 18′ at its surface, or surfaces, to support and promote adhesion of the photocatalyst coating 20 thereto. In the broadest sense of the invention, the substrate 18 may be a ceramic or metal, and the oxide surface layer(s) 18′ may either be applied via a separate application or growth step, or it may be native to the substrate material as obtainable from a supplier. In the event a ceramic is chosen as substrate 18, it might be an oxide such as silicon dioxide (silica) (SiO₂) or aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃), in which instance the surface layer 18′ and the substrate 18 would be one and the same. However, for purposes of the present description, the substrate 18 will be described in the context of a lightweight metal, and particularly aluminum. As used in this context herein, the term “aluminum” shall also include alloys of aluminum, such as AMS 5052. Moreover, although the aluminum substrate 18 may be obtained with a native layer of aluminum oxide (alumina) Al₂O₃already on its surface(s), the invention will be described in the context of a process for adding a surface layer of oxide (ceramic) such as alumina to the aluminum substrate. It will also be convenient from time to time to refer only to the substrate 18, where the clear intent is that the surface oxide layer 18′ is also included.
As illustrated in FIG. 2, the [0026] substrate 18 has a thickness T, provided by a sheet of aluminum foil having a thickness of about 0.002 inch (50 μm). The surface layer or coating of oxide 18′ is perhaps 0.1 to 0.5 μm or only {fraction (1/100)}^ththe thickness T of substrate 18. The nominal thickness of the photocatalytic coating 20 at each surface of substrate 18 for best activity is about 8 to 10 μm or about ⅕^ththe thickness of the substrate, such that the substrate and photocatalytic coatings on both surfaces thereof have a cumulative thickness, T′, of less than about 0.003 inch (75 μm).
Additional reference is now made to FIG. 3 in describing the process for providing an adherent [0027] photocatalytic coating 20 on a substrate 18, in this instance of aluminum. The photocatalyst of coating 20 is titanium dioxide (titania) TiO₂, though other similar photocatalyst materials may provide similar benefits. Function blocks 22 and 24 of FIG. 3 represent, respectively, the provision of an untreated sheet of metal (aluminum) foil and the mechanical configuring of the foil in accordance with an aspect of the invention to be described later in greater detail herein. The aluminum foil has a thickness of about 0.002 inch (0.05 mm), and is cleaned at function block 26. The cleaning process includes washing with soap and warm deionized water, a subsequent rinse with deionized water, and methanol, and drying in ambient air.
Assuming the foil does not already have an adequate native layer of oxide (alumina), it is necessary to form the [0028] oxide layer 18′ through an oxidizing pretreatment step represented by block 28. The layer(s) 18′ of alumina (Al₂O₃) is grown by a wet oxidation process in which the aluminum substrate 18 is placed in a moist air environment at a relative humidity of about 95% and is heated at about 85° C. for about one (1) hour. Although depicted separately, this oxidation process might be combined with the cleaning step of block 26.
[0029] Function block 30 represents the titania coating process, which includes the following detailed steps. The titania coating 20 is deposited by dip coating the pre-treated aluminum foil 18, 18′ in a homogeneous slurry consisting of P-25 titania powder (TiO₂) (by DeGussa) dispersed in TiO₂sol-gel. It will be appreciated that the foil 18, 18′ may be coated with the titania slurry using other coating techniques, such as spray coating or the like. The slurry is prepared by mixing the ball-milled powder (P-25) with a homogeneous sol-gel solution, and is followed by ball milling for achieving homogeneity.
A suitable and representative method and formulation for the preparation of TiO2 sol-gel is described in detail in the aforementioned PCT published patent application WO 96/37280 which is incorporated herein by reference. Briefly, 300 mL of deionized water was mixed with 1.79 mL of 70 wt % HNO[0030] ₃in a three-neck distilling flask. Another solution was prepared by mixing 16.54 mL of titanium isopropoxide Ti(O-iPr)₄with 30 mL iso-propanol(I-PrOH). The second solution was added drop-wise into the three-neck distilling flask with the aid of a dropping funnel while the mixture was stirred vigorously. The mixture was further stirred for half an hour at room temperature, followed by reflux at 80° C. for 12 hours.
A summary of the molar ratios of the reactants used for the TiO[0031] ₂sol-gel synthesis is shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1

TiO₂Sol-gel Ti(O-iPr)₄ i-PrOH H₂O HNO₃

#1 1 7.2 300 0.36

#2 1 — 280 0.09

It was determined that a maximized combination of photoactivity (as shown for 1-butene photocatalytic oxidation) and adhesion could be obtained by maintaining the P-25 titania loading in the slurry in a range from 20 wt % to 30 wt %, and the weight of P-25 coated on unit area of the

aluminum foil

18 should be maintained in the range from 0.8 to 1.0 Mg/cm². A summary of the combination of those relevant conditions is shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2


			# OF
		WEIGHT OF P-	DIPPINGS
		25	REQUIRED
		COATED ON	TO COAT 1
		UNIT AREA	mg/cm²of	MAXIMUM #
		(y), in	titania,	OF	RATE OF PHOTO-
	WT % P_—	mg/cm²VS #	i.e, P-25	DIPPINGS	OXIDATION
	25 IN	OF	and titania	WITH GOOD	OF
	THE	DIPPINGS (x)	sol-gel	ADHESION**	1-BUTENE*
#	SLURRY	y = f (x)	#	#	μmole/cm*h

	Pure				0.45
	P-25
1	20	y = 0.4136x +	2.3	2	0.425
		0.0209
2	25	y = 0.7295x +	1.3	1	0.415
		0.0146
3	30	Y = 0.9902x	1.0	1	0.426

Subsequent heat treatment of the coating is a calcining step, which is represented by [0033] function block 31, preferably in the temperature range from 150° C. to 250° C. for at least 2 hours. The resulting coated substrate is generally as depicted in FIG. 2.
The adhesion of the [0034] coating 20 has been tested by a tape test similar to the one described in ASTM D3330M-96, in which tape is adhered to the dried coating and then removed to evaluate the adhesion of the coating 20 to the substrate 18. The coating 20 formed in accordance with the invention was compared with a coating consisting of P-25 only. The adhesion test revealed that the coating formed in the presence of the TiO₂sol-gel performs better, i.e., adheres better, than the one coated without the sol-gel. The durability of the coating 20 was tested by exposing it, in a humidity chamber, to a relative humidity of 95% at 25° C. for 48 hours. No changes in the adhesion and the photoactivity were observed for the preferred coating under those conditions.
Having described the desired coating process depicted in a portion of FIG. 3, the remainder of that Figure is directed to the formation of a [0035] photocatalytic honeycomb monolith 12 in accordance with an aspect of the invention. Returning to function block 24, the aluminum foil substrate 18 is formed, as by pressing, rolling, stamping, or similar deforming process, to a generally corrugated shape having an alternating series of troughs and crests which define fin-like cell wall surfaces. This forming function occurs prior to the coating process of block 30 in order to provide a finish shape upon which to place the coating. Function block 32 depicts the step of cutting the corrugated and photocatalytic-coated aluminum foil 18 to appropriate lengths, and if necessary, widths, to provide the sheets 40 seen in FIG. 4. The corrugated sheets 40 are illustrated as having alternating fin-like troughs 42 and crests 44, which are shown here as being of rectilinear or “square-wave” shape. It will be understood, however, that other geometries including curved undulations, saw tooth, etc., may also be used. The selection of fin geometry of the corrugated sheets 40 is based on an optimized combination of maximum surface area per unit volume, maximum accessibility of UV light, and low manufacturing cost.
Referring further to FIGS. 3 and 4, and additionally to FIGS. [0036] 6A-6D, the corrugated sheets 40 are stacked (and assembled) at step 34 in such a manner that the fin-like trough 42 and crest 44 surfaces of the corrugations create the walls of honeycomb cells 46. The corrugated sheets 40 are cut and stacked such that the troughs 42 of one sheet underlie, or overlie, the crests 44 of the next adjacent sheet. To prevent successive corrugated sheets 40 from nesting, with trough in trough and crest in crest, during stacking and handling, a parting sheet 48 is placed between each adjacent pair of sheets 40. The parting sheets 48 are similarly of thin aluminum foil and are similarly coated with the same photocatalyst as the corrugated sheets 40. However the parting sheets 48 remain planar, and are not subjected to the corrugation forming step. The presence of the parting sheets 48 prevents nesting of adjacent corrugated sheets 40, even if some degree of misalignment does occur. In fact, the parting sheets 48 serve as walls to the cells 46 in alternating columns and rows to provide uniform cell size. In the illustrated embodiment, the cells 46 may have a flow length of 1 inch (or ½ inch if at end locations of the purifier 10) and an effective cross-sectional diameter or average dimension of about {fraction (1/8)} inch (3.2 mm).
To finish the assembly of a [0037] photocatalytic honeycomb monolith 12, as represented by block 36 in FIG. 3, it is necessary to provide a housing frame 50 (seen in FIGS. 6A-6D) which surrounds the outer perimeter of the assembly of stacked corrugated sheets 40 and included parting sheets 48. The housing frame 50 is typically provided by a lightweight, U-shaped, metal channel member which is formed to bend into an encircling enclosure tightly about the periphery of the stacked sheets 40 and 48. The ends of the frame 50 may be joined be suitable means which do not introduce any VOCs, as for example mechanical fasteners including tabs, rivets, etc., or even metal bonds such as welds. In addition to capturing and binding the stacked sheets 40 and 48, the frame 50 serves to seal the periphery against fluid leaks by the flow stream 14 being cleansed.
To prevent or minimize displacement of the core, or stack of [0038] sheets 40 and 48, within frame 50 as a result of forces generated by the fluid flow 14, it may be desirable to provide further stabilization in the direction of flow. To that end, FIGS. 6A-6D depict alternative forms of stabilizing members, which typically take the form of metal or ceramic pins or bars 52. The stabilizer pins 52 are sufficiently rigid to resist displacement of the core by the fluid flow forces, but relatively small in cross-section to minimize interference with fluid flow and the entry of illumination to cells 46. In FIG. 6A, a pair of stabilizer pins 52 are arranged in “X” fashion across each of the opposite end faces of the honeycomb monolith 12, and are fastened to frame 50 without the use of materials creating VOCs, as by rivets or the like. In FIG. 6B, a pair of stabilizer pins 52 are arranged in “cross” fashion across each of the opposite end faces of the honeycomb monolith 12′, and fastened to frame 50. FIG. 6C depicts another positioning of the stabilizer pins 52 wherein they are inserted through the body of the honeycomb monolith 12″, as for instance through pre-formed and pre-aligned holes (not shown) drilled in the stacked sheets 40 and 48. Those pins 52 may extend into, or through, similar holes in the frame 50 and be suitably fastened thereto. FIG. 6D depicts a honeycomb monolith 12′″ that differs in that instead of a single core, or stack of sheets 40 and 48, it contains four “mini-cores” in the same space. The cells 46′ of the mini-cores may be smaller, as depicted, or not. Also, the stabilizer pins 52 are arranged in a “cross” fashion similar to that of FIG. 6B to not only serve as stabilizers, but to also capture the inner perimeters of the several mini-cores.
Although the honeycomb monolith core structure of the embodiments depicted in FIGS. 3, 4, and [0039] 6A-6D was formed through the use of a stacked arrangement of corrugated, photocatalyst-coated sheets, certain aspects of the invention also apply to similar cores formed in differing manners. For instance, referring to FIG. 5, the honeycomb core structure may use an array of thin, lightweight sheets 60 and 62 of metal or ceramic, provided with a photocatalyst coating as described previously. However, instead of sheets 60 and 62 being corrugated to create cells when stacked in the manner described, the sheets remain planar and instead are provided with slots 64 at spaced intervals along an edge thereof. The sheets 60 are oriented orthogonally to the sheets 62, and the slots 64 in each are sized, positioned and spaced such that sheets 60 and 64 may be interfitted with one another in “eggcrate” fashion, thereby forming the cells of the honeycomb core structure. As previously, no materials or processes which could give rise to VOCs during operation of the purifier 10 are utilized in the formation of the honeycomb monolith.
Although the invention has been described and illustrated with respect to the exemplary embodiments thereof, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing and various other changes, omissions and additions may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. [0040]

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A honeycomb photocatalyst matrix for purifying fluid flowing therethrough, comprising:

a) a honeycomb-shaped skeletal structure (12) of material selected from the group consisting of metal and ceramic, said honeycomb structure comprising an array of multiple, substantially parallel, cells (46, 46′) open at opposite ends for fluid flow (14) therethrough and illumination therewithin, and having respective cell surfaces; and

b) a coating (20) of photocatalyst on the surfaces of the cells of the honeycomb structure, whereby the coated surfaces (20) of the cells are activated by ultraviolet illumination (16) to promote photocatalytic chemical reaction of contaminants contained in a fluid flowing (14) through the cells.

2. The honeycomb photocatalyst matrix of claim 1 wherein the honeycomb-shaped skeletal structure (12) comprises a plurality of sheets (40) of lightweight metal, each of said sheets being formed to provide an alternating series of crests (44) and troughs (42), said sheets being oriented in stacked arrangement with one another such that said crests and troughs define the respective said cells (46, 46′).

3. The honeycomb photocatalyst matrix of claim 2 wherein the honeycomb-shaped skeletal structure (12) further includes a plurality of planar sheets (48) of lightweight metal, respective ones of said planar sheets of lightweight metal being interposed between respective adjacent pairs of said stacked sheets (40) having said crests (44) and troughs (42), whereby said planar sheets comprise parting sheets between said sheets having crests and troughs and form a respective surface of said cells, and wherein said sheets having said troughs and crests and said parting sheets are of aluminum.

4. The honeycomb photocatalyst matrix of claim 1 wherein the honeycomb-shaped skeletal structure (12) comprises an array of substantially planar metal sheets (60, 62), with a portion of said sheets (60) being oriented orthogonally to and interfitted with, the remainder of said sheets (62) in substantially “eggcrate” fashion to define said cells.

5. The honeycomb photocatalyst matrix of claim 1 wherein the honeycomb-shaped skeletal structure (12) includes an outer perimeter, and further comprising a frame (50) formed about the outer perimeter of the honeycomb-shaped skeletal structure to maintain the stability thereof transverse to the direction of fluid flow through the cells.

6. The honeycomb photocatalyst matrix of claim 5 wherein the frame (50) and the honeycomb-shaped skeletal structure (12) are assembled and fastened with means having neither adhesives nor organic materials, thereby eliminating a source of volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

7. The honeycomb photocatalyst matrix of claim 5 further including at least one stabilizer member (52) that is fastened to the frame (50) and positioned to resist displacement of the honeycomb-shaped skeletal structure (12) relative to the frame in the direction of fluid flow therethrough.

8. The honeycomb photocatalyst matrix of claim 7 comprising at least two stabilizer members (52), and wherein the stabilizer members are positioned adjacent the opposite ends of the cells to also resist displacement of the honeycomb-shaped skeletal structure (12) relative to the frame in a direction opposite to the direction of fluid flow therethrough.

9. The honeycomb photocatalyst matrix of claim 7 wherein a plurality of stabilizer members (52) extend through the honeycomb-shaped skeletal structure (12) transverse to the direction of fluid flow (14) therethrough.

10. The honeycomb photocatalyst matrix of claim 3 wherein said crests (44) and troughs (42) in the respective said sheets are substantially rectilinear.

11. The honeycomb photocatalyst matrix of claim 10 wherein the thickness of the aluminum forming the honeycomb-shaped skeletal structure is about 0.002 inch.

12. The honeycomb photocatalyst matrix of claim 11 wherein the honeycomb-shaped skeletal structure (12) is about one inch thick in the direction of fluid flow (14) therethrough, and the cells have an equivalent diameter transverse to the fluid flow of about 0.125 inch.

13. The honeycomb photocatalyst matrix of claim 10 wherein the surfaces of the respective cells have an oxide layer (18′) thereon and the photocatalyst coating (20) is formed on said oxide layer, to thereby enhance adhesion between the photocatalyst and the skeletal structure.

14. The honeycomb photocatalyst matrix of claim 1 wherein the surfaces of the respective cells have an oxide layer (18′) thereon and the photocatalyst coating (20) is formed on said oxide layer, to thereby enhance adhesion between the photocatalyst and the skeletal structure.

15. The honeycomb photocatalyst matrix of claim 2 wherein said sheets (40) formed to provide the alternating series of crests (44) and troughs (42) include said coating of photocatalyst (20) thereon prior to said sheets (40) being oriented in said stacked arrangement.

16. The honeycomb photocatalyst matrix of claim 3 wherein said sheets (40) formed to provide the alternating series of crests (44) and troughs (42) and said planar parting sheets (48) include said coating of photocatalyst (20) thereon prior to said sheets (40, 48) being oriented in said stacked arrangement.

17. The honeycomb photocatalyst matrix of claim 4 wherein said metal sheets (60, 62) include said coating of photocatalyst (20) thereon prior to said sheets being interfitted in substantially “eggcrate” fashion to define said cells.