US20020087707A1 - Network protocols for distributing functions within a network - Google Patents
Network protocols for distributing functions within a network Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20020087707A1 US20020087707A1 US09/751,189 US75118900A US2002087707A1 US 20020087707 A1 US20020087707 A1 US 20020087707A1 US 75118900 A US75118900 A US 75118900A US 2002087707 A1 US2002087707 A1 US 2002087707A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- server
- service
- client device
- request
- quality
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 68
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 claims description 43
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 28
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims 3
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 abstract description 11
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 9
- 238000013475 authorization Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000014510 cooky Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002360 explosive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L61/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services for addressing or naming
- H04L61/35—Network arrangements, protocols or services for addressing or naming involving non-standard use of addresses for implementing network functionalities, e.g. coding subscription information within the address or functional addressing, i.e. assigning an address to a function
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L61/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services for addressing or naming
- H04L61/45—Network directories; Name-to-address mapping
- H04L61/4505—Network directories; Name-to-address mapping using standardised directories; using standardised directory access protocols
- H04L61/4511—Network directories; Name-to-address mapping using standardised directories; using standardised directory access protocols using domain name system [DNS]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
- H04L67/1004—Server selection for load balancing
- H04L67/1008—Server selection for load balancing based on parameters of servers, e.g. available memory or workload
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
- H04L67/1004—Server selection for load balancing
- H04L67/101—Server selection for load balancing based on network conditions
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
- H04L67/1004—Server selection for load balancing
- H04L67/1014—Server selection for load balancing based on the content of a request
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
- H04L67/1004—Server selection for load balancing
- H04L67/1021—Server selection for load balancing based on client or server locations
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
- H04L67/1034—Reaction to server failures by a load balancer
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
- H04L67/1038—Load balancing arrangements to avoid a single path through a load balancer
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L9/00—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
- H04L9/40—Network security protocols
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
- H04L67/10015—Access to distributed or replicated servers, e.g. using brokers
Definitions
- the present invention is directed to the transfer of information via a network and, more particularly, to network protocols that permit control functions, such as content and application switching functions, to be distributed among various locations within a network.
- TCP Transfer control protocol
- IP Internet protocol
- TCP/IP Internet protocol
- a user of a client device browser program, or similar program enters the domain name of an Internet site, enters a uniform resource locator (URL) that includes a domain name, clicks on a hyperlink to a domain name or to a URL, or otherwise requests a domain name or a URL using hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP), file transfer protocol (FTP) or Telnet, and the browser program or similar program sends a request to a domain name system (DNS) server to look up the domain name or URL and obtain the Internet address that corresponds to the domain name or the URL.
- DNS domain name system
- the DNS server responds by sending the Internet address of the server that serves the selected Internet site or domain name. Only one Internet address is stored for each domain name.
- HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol
- Diffserv Diffserv
- IPsec IPsec
- SSL Secure Sockets Layer
- a “server farm” is used in which multiple servers each store the same Web pages or Internet services.
- a switching device such as a content switch, is disposed between the servers of the server farm and the rest of the Internet to process incoming requests from client devices and send the requests to one of the servers.
- Their incoming request includes an Internet address that corresponds to the desired domain name but which actually directs the request to the switching device. Because the Internet permits only one network address to correspond to a given domain name, the presence of multiple servers that each serve the same Web sites or Internet pages cannot be made known to the client device or to the servers.
- the content switch must therefore re-map the Internet address contained in the request with the Internet address of the respective server so that it appears to the server that it is connected directly to the client device. Further, the content switch must send responses to the client device that emulate the existence of only a single server and must also re-map the Internet address contained in the responses.
- a network be configured that accommodates the existence of multiple servers for a given service.
- newer services such as multimedia streaming services, required additional bandwidth that is not needed for either network functions.
- many of the presently used applications or present networks do not permit the network or a server to provide different qualities of service for a respective client or for a particular service.
- the present invention provides network protocols that distribute control and lookup functions among the various network elements, such as to permit plural servers to provide the same services without requiring re-mapping and to permit each client or server to have different network quality of service or server quality of service levels.
- the transfer of information via a network is controlled.
- a request is received from a client device for a network address that is associated with a service.
- a respective one of a plurality of network addresses is selected, each of which corresponds to a respective one of a plurality of servers that are available to provide the service.
- the respective network address is transmitted to the client device so that the client device may transmit at least one service request associated with the service that is to be directed to the respective network address.
- a request to determine whether a client device is associated with at least one quality of service level is received from one of a services database server and a domain name server.
- a response to the request is transmitted to the server such that the server selects a respective one of a plurality of network addresses, each of which corresponds to a respective one of a plurality of servers that are available to provide a service, based on the response.
- a request by a service server that is currently designated to receive service requests from a client device is transmitted to a further service server for the further server to receive further service requests from the client device.
- the service server and the further server are each associated with a common service.
- a response from the further service server is received.
- the response is favorable, an indication to the client device that the further service request are to be directed to the further server is transmitted.
- a request for an available further service server that is associated with a service is received from a service server that is currently designated to receive service requests from a client device.
- the service server and the available further service server are each associated with the service.
- a network address for the available further service server is transmitted to the server such that the server may transmit a request to the further service server for the further service server to receive service requests from the client device.
- a request to provide a quality of service level for a client device is received from either a server or a client device.
- a request to verify that the quality of the service level is associated with the client device is transmitted to a database.
- a notification is transmitted to the server or the client device that the request to provide the quality of service is accepted.
- a request to verify whether a client device is associated with a quality of service level is received from at least one of a network and a server.
- a response to the request is transmitted to the network or the server such that the network provides the quality of service level for the client device based on the response.
- a service request at a quality of service level is received from a client device.
- a request to verify that the quality of service level is associated with the client device is transmitted to a database.
- a response is transmitted to the client device at the quality of service level.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a known arrangement of a network in which each domain name is serviced by a single server.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing a known arrangement of a network in which a domain name may be serviced by plural servers in a server farm that are connected to the Internet via a content switch.
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing an example of an arrangement in which plural servers service a respective domain name or URL using a protocol in accordance with of the protocol of the invention.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing an example of an arrangement in which plural servers service a respective domain name or URL and in which plural qualities of service are provided using a protocol of the invention.
- FIG. 5 is a diagram showing known requests and responses between a client device, a DNS and a server.
- FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a transaction in which a client device obtains service in accordance with an example of a protocol of the invention.
- FIG. 7 is a diagram showing a service handoff between servers in accordance with an example of a protocol of the invention.
- FIG. 9 is a diagram showing a client-initiated quality of service level set-up operation in accordance with an example of protocol of the invention.
- the invention provides network protocols that distribute application and content functions among various network elements. Included are protocols for performing lookup functions that recognize a one-to-many mapping, that permit an application to take advantage of load balancing of server farms, and/or permit service level negotiation, cache maintenance, updates of domain name and service type table entries, client and/or server negotiation with network elements which may involve a services database, network element to network element negotiation which may involve a services database, and server to server coordination for load balancing including seamless handoff of a client transaction.
- the protocols of the invention also provide the ability to provide differentiated services as part of an initial server lookup by the client, such as a lookup by a domain name system server in a services database.
- the invention also provides differentiated services as part of a client and/or service lookup by a server when a request is received, when redirection is requested, or in the middle of a session when a particular service is accessed.
- the request may be to a services data base.
- the invention further provides differentiated services as part of a lookup by a network element that is attempting to route a request, such as when a client has paid for a better class of service or when a service provider, such as a company with web site, pays a network services provider for a better class of client service.
- An explicit one-to-many Internet mapping is provided in place of the current Internet one-to-one mapping.
- Supporting protocols such as DNS, BGP, and HTTP, may be modified to support the one-to-many mapping as well as service level lookup.
- FIG. 1 shows an example of a known arrangement for a network.
- a domain name system (DNS) 120 includes a database having domain names and the network address, such as the Internet protocol (IP) address, of the server 130 that services the domain. Only one network address is stored for each domain name or service so that only one server may be accessed when the address of a domain name or service is requested.
- DNS domain name system
- IP Internet protocol
- the client device 100 sends a request via a network 110 , such as the Internet, to the DNS server 120 and receives the network address from the DNS server via the network.
- the client device may then transmit service requests to the server 130 via the network 110 using the network address. If too many requests are made to the domain name, the server is overloaded, thus causing delays and possibly causing the server to fail.
- FIG. 2 illustrates an example of another known network arrangement in which plural servers provide the same service.
- the DNS server supplies the client device with the network address of a content switch or similar device 230 .
- the client device using the network address, may send service requests via the network 210 to the content switch 230 in a manner as if the client device were communicating directly with a server.
- the content switch then re-maps the network address in the service request with the network address of one of the servers 240 , 242 , 244 , 246 , . . . of a server farm and then forwards the service request to the respective server.
- the respective server When the respective server sends a response to the request, it includes the network address of the server and not that of the content switch.
- the content switch then re-maps the address of server with its own address.
- the client device communicates with the content switch as if it was communicating directly with a single server, and the server communicates with the content switch as if it were communicating directly with the client device without the existence of the other servers.
- FIG. 2 requires the use of an additional network device, such as the content switch, and the use of additional processing power and processing time to carry out a remapping step whenever a service request is transmitted from a client device to a server.
- an additional network device such as the content switch
- FIG. 3 shows an example of an arrangement in which protocols of the invention are provided that permit multiple servers to provide the same service without requiring added network devices.
- An extended domain name system (eDNS) server 320 includes a database that is capable of storing more than one network address for a particular service or domain name, namely the network addresses of more than one server.
- the eDNS server may also store information such as the availability of each of the corresponding servers, the order of priority for selecting one of the plural servers, and/or the locations of the servers.
- a client device 300 sends a request for the network address corresponds to a desired service to the eDNS server 320 via a network 310 comprised of plural network elements, such as the Internet, an Intranet, a service provider (SP) network, or other networks
- the eDNS server responds by transmitting the network address of one of a plurality of service servers 330 , 340 , 350 , . . . , such as application servers, email servers, other messaging servers, Web servers, or other service servers.
- the eDNS server 320 may select the respective server based on one or more selection criteria such as the order of priority of the servers, the server nearest to the client device, the quality of service provided by a particular server, and/or the availability of a server.
- the client device 300 may then transmit service requests, via the network 310 , that include the actual network address of the server that will service the client.
- the client typically supplies a service request to the eDNS server that at least includes the service type requested and a domain name.
- the client may also provide a service-level class request, i.e. request a preferential level of services, wherein the client also provides an identifier that can be mapped to the database associated with a particular domain name.
- the domain name can have its own collection of service classes subject to further standardization.
- the client may have also already gone to a services database and requested a service-level authorization, such as for preferential treatment by the server that will provide the service requested by the client or by the network itself. In such a case, the client will provide a service authorization “handle” that the eDNS server can use to verify the service-level agreement and to verify the identity of the client.
- the eDNS server also has information from/about the target provider, e.g. explicit knowledge of multiple server IP addresses, server “health”, server weighting, server location, etc., that was negotiated and/or communicated.
- the eDNS server sends the client an authorization handle to use when going out over the network, along with a protocol directive on how to proceed.
- the eDNS server takes into account the client information as well as the server information.
- the eDNS server may also implement other features such as round-robin load balancing among available servers for a particular service in the absence of any specific directive.
- the service servers also communicate “health” information about its state of operation to the other servers that are providing a particular service, even if the servers are geographically separated.
- the information is used to help each application on the servers to properly load balance and to potentially recover from application level, network level, or server hardware failures by redirecting clients and by updating eDNS servers with new health information.
- the server may “hand-off” operation to another one of the servers by transmitting messages to the new server, either via the network or by a direct connection with the new server, and to the client device, via the network.
- the server then notifies the eDNS server of its unavailability.
- the server is capable of handing the client device off to another server without interrupting the session at the client device.
- FIG. 4 depicts another example of the invention in which protocols of the invention permit a client device or a server to select from one or more quality of service (QoS) levels as well as provide the functions carried out the network of FIG. 3.
- the quality of service levels may include different server quality of service levels, such as whether to provide web pages or other network services that have enhanced features or whether to use a better class of server having a lower latency and/or that handles fewer connections.
- the class of service levels may include different network quality of service levels, such as the amount of network bandwidth used, etc.
- a services database server 460 stores information concerning the quality of service that is permitted to each of various client devices and servers.
- the services data base server receives requests from the network 410 and/or from the servers 430 , 440 , 450 , . . . regarding whether a respective client and/or a respective server has permission to receive a higher network quality of service.
- the server 460 verifies whether such permission exist and transmits a response to the network and/or the server.
- the services database server may also receive requests from the servers 430 , 440 , 450 , . . . regarding whether a respective client has permission to receive higher server quality of service levels and either allows or denies such requests.
- FIG. 5 illustrates an example of the Internet protocol of an existing network, such as is shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.
- a user enters a request for a domain name or a URL using a client device browser program, or using an other HTTP request, FTP request or Telnet request, or other Internet protocol request and the client device transmits an Address Lookup Request to the DNS that request the IP address or other network address of the server that services the requested domain name or URL.
- the DNS returns the IP address or other network address of the server or, when more than one server services the requested domain name or URL, the DNS transmits the IP address or other network address of a content switch or similar network device.
- the client device may then transmit service requests, such as requests for Web pages or other network services, to the server, content switch, or other network device using the address supplied to it by the DNS.
- service requests such as requests for Web pages or other network services
- the server may then transmit service requests, such as requests for Web pages or other network services, to the server, content switch, or other network device using the address supplied to it by the DNS.
- a response to the service request is sent from the server to the client device.
- FIGS. 6, 7, 8 and 9 illustrate examples of protocols of the invention.
- a Universal Resource Locator is used instead of the domain name.
- the URL includes a protocol specification, e.g. “http:”, a domain name, e.g. www.yahoo.com, and an optional port number, e.g. “ 8080 ”, in the form of “http://www.yahoo.com: 8080 ”, for example.
- the mapping class i.e. the domain name
- the service type i.e. the protocol and port specification
- a single domain name i.e. a collection of servers, may provide several different services, such as a sub-set of a server farm that provides FTP services while the entire server farm is provides HTTP services.
- the domain name and the service name are used as input for mapping to an IP address.
- the eDNS server returns the IP address and port number of server that provides the service requested by the client.
- the eDNS server returns the IP address and port number based on a service-level agreement looked up in a database, namely a preferred client gets connected to a server port 8000 rather than the standard port 80 for an HTTP request so that it is given a different priority or a different look and/or feel.
- FIG. 6 illustrates an example of a network protocol of the invention for basic transactions.
- one or more service servers that are available to provide the same service such as Server 1 and Server 2 , inform the eDNS server that they are available to accept service requests.
- the available servers each transmit a message, such as a Register Server request, that includes the domain name, the network address of the service server and the services that the service server accepts.
- the servers may also provide authentication and non-repudiation information to the eDNS server that establishes the validity of the server for serving the domain name.
- the eDNS server When a service server is authenticated, the eDNS server transmits a message to Server 1 or Server 2 that its authentication and non-repudiation has been accepted and adds the address of the server to a list of network addresses of servers that are available to provide the service.
- the eDNS may first access the services database to determine whether there are any special permissions or denials that are associated with the client.
- the services database may recognize that the client is a frequent user of the requested service, is a prior customer of the requested service, or has paid for a higher quality form of the service, and notifies the eDNS to respond to the client device with a network address of a server that provides the higher quality service.
- the services database recognizes that the client is an undesired client and informs the eDNS server accordingly so that the eDNS server returns the network address of a server that provides lesser quality service or denies the request of the client device.
- the services database may not recognize the client device and informs the eDNS server to respond with the network address of the server that provides standard service.
- the client device may then transmit one or more Service Requests to the network address provided by the eDNS server.
- the Service Requests are delivered to the selected server which, in turn, delivers one or more responses to the client device.
- the service server may also, prior to responding to the service request of the client device, transmit a request to the services database to verify that the quality of service requested by the client device is permitted to the client device and, based on the response received from the services database, deliver or deny the requested quality of service to the client device.
- FIG. 7 illustrates an example of a protocol for carrying out a server to server hand-off of a client device in accordance with the invention.
- the client device requests a network address of a server that provides a service and receives the network address of a service server, such as Server 1 .
- Server 1 transfers communication with the client to another server.
- Server 1 first transmits a request to a local database (not shown) or to the eDNS server to determine the network address of the next available server and, as an example, receives the address of Server 2 .
- Server 1 transmits a Handoff Request to Server 2 that may include information about the client.
- the client information may include cookie or other state information, security information, transaction state information such as the client's shopping cart, or other Open Standard Interconnection (OSI) reference model layers 4 or layers 5 - 7 protocol information.
- OSI Open Standard Interconnection
- Server 1 may also send a message to the eDNS server, such as an Availability Update, that informs the eDNS server that it is no longer available to serve that given domain name.
- the eDNS server then updates its database and replies with a message indicating that the update was accepted.
- Server 1 transmits a Handoff Request to Server 2 , as described above, when Server 1 is overloaded with requests, needs to shut down for routine maintenance or to correct an operational problem, or wishes to upgrade or downgrade the server quality of service provided to the client.
- FIG. 8 depicts an example of a protocol for carrying out a server-initiated network quality of service (QoS) transaction according to the invention.
- QoS network quality of service
- the service server transmits a request to at least one network element of the network that asks the network element to provide the associated quality of service for all communication between the service server and the client.
- the network element may also determine whether the client is entitled to receive the desired quality of service and whether the server is permitted to make such a request by transmitting a verification message to the services database.
- the network element transmits a message to the service server indicating that its request was accepted.
- the service server transmits a message to the client, such as a “Quality of Service Setup Done” message, that informs the client of the network quality of service level that it is to receive.
- the service server may also handoff the client to another server that provides the desired quality of service level, as described above, and inform the client of the new network address together with the quality of service level.
- the level of network quality of service may be transparent to the user of the client device or, alternatively, may be displayed to the user at a location on a display screen of the browser program or other program.
- the Quality of Service Setup Done message may be sent to the client while the client is receiving a response to an earlier Service Request from the server, such as when the client is receiving a Web page from the server.
- the client may then continue receiving the services or the Web pages using the new quality of service level, and possibly from another server, in “mid-byte stream” without interruption.
- the client may transmit further Service Requests using the new quality of service level and receive responses accordingly.
- FIG. 9 illustrates an example of a protocol for a quality of service level transaction that is initiated by the client. After the client sends a request to the eDNS server for a network address that corresponds to a desired service and receives the network address from the eDNS server, as described above, the client transmits a request for a desired network quality of service level to the network.
- At least one network element of the network transmits a verification request to the services database to determine whether the client is permitted to receive service at the desired quality of service level.
- the services database determines whether the client is entitled to the desired quality of service level and notifies the network element accordingly.
- the network element delivers a message to the client that the request has been granted. Thereafter, the client may transmit Service Requests using the granted quality of service level to the service server and receives responses thereto from the service server.
- the service server before transmitting a grant or deny response to the client, may also transmit a request to the services database to verify that the client is entitled to receive network and/or server quality of service at the desired level.
- the protocols of the invention provide the network with, for example, the flexibility to provide a client with one of a plurality of servers that correspond to a requested domain name based on the availability of a server, the location of a server, the server quality of service that is to be provided to the client and/or the network quality of service to be provided to the client.
- the protocols of the invention enable a server to readily handoff a client to another server as needed or to provide the client with a different server quality of service or network quality of service. The handoff may be carried out in a manner that is transparent to the client.
- the protocols of the invention permit the ready determination and verification of the service and the network quality of service network levels to which a client and/or a server is entitled.
- the invention also permits geographic positioning of the service servers to be included in routing decisions.
- the servers of a “server farm” may be distributed geographically.
- the eDNS server may take into account the physical distance between the client and the service server when selecting a respective service server.
- the geographical information may be included in the network protocols.
- a company that provides a service may have multiple points of presence across a nation, across a continent, or across the globe so that customers in particular geographic regions are preferentially routed to the nearest point of presence. When the nearest point of presence is overloaded or malfunctioning, the client is alternatively redirected to another point of presence.
- the protocols of the invention permit one of a plurality of eDNS servers to function as a “master” server for particular service or domain name.
- the master server ensures that any cached entries for the domain name or service are correctly updated in the other eDNS servers.
- the master server also propagates changes in the server mappings, the “health” of respective servers and the weighting of the service servers to the other eDNS servers.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer And Data Communications (AREA)
- Communication Control (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention is directed to the transfer of information via a network and, more particularly, to network protocols that permit control functions, such as content and application switching functions, to be distributed among various locations within a network.
- The protocols used in the Internet, as originally intended, permit only one server to correspond to a given service and a given domain name. Transfer control protocol (TCP) and Internet protocol (IP), referred to as TCP/IP, are examples of Internet protocols that were designed to allow one application running on one computer to communicate with another application running on another computer or on the same computer. The one-to-one mapping is fundamental to the protocols used, and the various infrastructure protocols that were created to support a rapidly growing global TCP/IP-based Internet were designed to facilitate and support the one-to-one communications.
- As an example of one-to-one communication, a user of a client device browser program, or similar program, enters the domain name of an Internet site, enters a uniform resource locator (URL) that includes a domain name, clicks on a hyperlink to a domain name or to a URL, or otherwise requests a domain name or a URL using hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP), file transfer protocol (FTP) or Telnet, and the browser program or similar program sends a request to a domain name system (DNS) server to look up the domain name or URL and obtain the Internet address that corresponds to the domain name or the URL. The DNS server responds by sending the Internet address of the server that serves the selected Internet site or domain name. Only one Internet address is stored for each domain name.
- Other Internet protocols are similarly constructed, such as Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), Diffserv, IPsec, Secure Sockets Layer (SSL), etc.
- The recent explosive growth in Internet and World Wide Web (Web) activity has created a demand for some Web sites or Internet services that far exceeds the capacity of a single server. To prevent server overloading, a “server farm” is used in which multiple servers each store the same Web pages or Internet services. A switching device, such as a content switch, is disposed between the servers of the server farm and the rest of the Internet to process incoming requests from client devices and send the requests to one of the servers. Their incoming request includes an Internet address that corresponds to the desired domain name but which actually directs the request to the switching device. Because the Internet permits only one network address to correspond to a given domain name, the presence of multiple servers that each serve the same Web sites or Internet pages cannot be made known to the client device or to the servers. The content switch must therefore re-map the Internet address contained in the request with the Internet address of the respective server so that it appears to the server that it is connected directly to the client device. Further, the content switch must send responses to the client device that emulate the existence of only a single server and must also re-map the Internet address contained in the responses.
- The re-mapping operations thus requires additional content switch processing resources. However, applications that require content switches are becoming increasingly common, thus further taxing the content switch resources and potentially creating processing delays. Content switches are also costly.
- It is therefore desirable that a network be configured that accommodates the existence of multiple servers for a given service.
- Further, newer services, such as multimedia streaming services, required additional bandwidth that is not needed for either network functions. However, many of the presently used applications or present networks do not permit the network or a server to provide different qualities of service for a respective client or for a particular service.
- It is therefore desirable to provide the network with the capability of providing different qualities of service.
- The present invention provides network protocols that distribute control and lookup functions among the various network elements, such as to permit plural servers to provide the same services without requiring re-mapping and to permit each client or server to have different network quality of service or server quality of service levels.
- In accordance with an aspect of the invention, the transfer of information via a network is controlled. A request is received from a client device for a network address that is associated with a service. A respective one of a plurality of network addresses is selected, each of which corresponds to a respective one of a plurality of servers that are available to provide the service. The respective network address is transmitted to the client device so that the client device may transmit at least one service request associated with the service that is to be directed to the respective network address.
- According to another aspect of the invention, a request to determine whether a client device is associated with at least one quality of service level is received from one of a services database server and a domain name server. A response to the request is transmitted to the server such that the server selects a respective one of a plurality of network addresses, each of which corresponds to a respective one of a plurality of servers that are available to provide a service, based on the response.
- According to a further aspect of the invention, a request by a service server that is currently designated to receive service requests from a client device is transmitted to a further service server for the further server to receive further service requests from the client device.
- The service server and the further server are each associated with a common service. A response from the further service server is received. When the response is favorable, an indication to the client device that the further service request are to be directed to the further server is transmitted.
- According to a still further aspect of the invention, a request for an available further service server that is associated with a service is received from a service server that is currently designated to receive service requests from a client device. The service server and the available further service server are each associated with the service. A network address for the available further service server is transmitted to the server such that the server may transmit a request to the further service server for the further service server to receive service requests from the client device.
- According to yet another aspect of the invention, a request for a quality of service level associated with a client device is transmitted to a database. The quality of service level associated with the client device is received from the database. A request to provide the quality of service level is transmitted to a network. When the request for the quality of service level is accepted, a notification of the quality of service level is transmitted to the client device.
- According to still another aspect of the invention, a request to provide a quality of service level for a client device is received from either a server or a client device. A request to verify that the quality of the service level is associated with the client device is transmitted to a database. When the quality of service level is verified, a notification is transmitted to the server or the client device that the request to provide the quality of service is accepted.
- In accordance with an additional aspect of the invention, a request to verify whether a client device is associated with a quality of service level is received from at least one of a network and a server. A response to the request is transmitted to the network or the server such that the network provides the quality of service level for the client device based on the response.
- According to a still additional aspect of the invention, a service request at a quality of service level is received from a client device. A request to verify that the quality of service level is associated with the client device is transmitted to a database. When the quality of service level is verified, a response is transmitted to the client device at the quality of service level.
- Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention with reference to the accompanying drawings.
- The invention will now be described in greater detail in the following detailed description with reference to the drawings in which:
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a known arrangement of a network in which each domain name is serviced by a single server.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing a known arrangement of a network in which a domain name may be serviced by plural servers in a server farm that are connected to the Internet via a content switch.
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing an example of an arrangement in which plural servers service a respective domain name or URL using a protocol in accordance with of the protocol of the invention.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing an example of an arrangement in which plural servers service a respective domain name or URL and in which plural qualities of service are provided using a protocol of the invention.
- FIG. 5 is a diagram showing known requests and responses between a client device, a DNS and a server.
- FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a transaction in which a client device obtains service in accordance with an example of a protocol of the invention.
- FIG. 7 is a diagram showing a service handoff between servers in accordance with an example of a protocol of the invention.
- FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a server-initiated quality of service level set-up operation in accordance with an example of a protocol of the invention.
- FIG. 9 is a diagram showing a client-initiated quality of service level set-up operation in accordance with an example of protocol of the invention.
- The invention provides network protocols that distribute application and content functions among various network elements. Included are protocols for performing lookup functions that recognize a one-to-many mapping, that permit an application to take advantage of load balancing of server farms, and/or permit service level negotiation, cache maintenance, updates of domain name and service type table entries, client and/or server negotiation with network elements which may involve a services database, network element to network element negotiation which may involve a services database, and server to server coordination for load balancing including seamless handoff of a client transaction.
- The protocols of the invention also provide the ability to provide differentiated services as part of an initial server lookup by the client, such as a lookup by a domain name system server in a services database. The invention also provides differentiated services as part of a client and/or service lookup by a server when a request is received, when redirection is requested, or in the middle of a session when a particular service is accessed. The request may be to a services data base. The invention further provides differentiated services as part of a lookup by a network element that is attempting to route a request, such as when a client has paid for a better class of service or when a service provider, such as a company with web site, pays a network services provider for a better class of client service.
- An explicit one-to-many Internet mapping is provided in place of the current Internet one-to-one mapping. Supporting protocols, such as DNS, BGP, and HTTP, may be modified to support the one-to-many mapping as well as service level lookup.
- FIG. 1 shows an example of a known arrangement for a network. A domain name system (DNS)120 includes a database having domain names and the network address, such as the Internet protocol (IP) address, of the
server 130 that services the domain. Only one network address is stored for each domain name or service so that only one server may be accessed when the address of a domain name or service is requested. - When a user enters the domain name or a URL into a location on a browser program or similar program screen or when a user clicks on a hyperlink to the domain name or URL, the
client device 100 sends a request via anetwork 110, such as the Internet, to theDNS server 120 and receives the network address from the DNS server via the network. The client device may then transmit service requests to theserver 130 via thenetwork 110 using the network address. If too many requests are made to the domain name, the server is overloaded, thus causing delays and possibly causing the server to fail. - FIG. 2 illustrates an example of another known network arrangement in which plural servers provide the same service. When a
client device 200 request a network address from aDNS server 220 in the manner described above, the DNS server supplies the client device with the network address of a content switch orsimilar device 230. The client device, using the network address, may send service requests via thenetwork 210 to thecontent switch 230 in a manner as if the client device were communicating directly with a server. The content switch then re-maps the network address in the service request with the network address of one of theservers - The arrangement of FIG. 2, however, requires the use of an additional network device, such as the content switch, and the use of additional processing power and processing time to carry out a remapping step whenever a service request is transmitted from a client device to a server.
- Thus, FIG. 3 shows an example of an arrangement in which protocols of the invention are provided that permit multiple servers to provide the same service without requiring added network devices. An extended domain name system (eDNS)
server 320 includes a database that is capable of storing more than one network address for a particular service or domain name, namely the network addresses of more than one server. The eDNS server may also store information such as the availability of each of the corresponding servers, the order of priority for selecting one of the plural servers, and/or the locations of the servers. - When a
client device 300 sends a request for the network address corresponds to a desired service to theeDNS server 320 via anetwork 310 comprised of plural network elements, such as the Internet, an Intranet, a service provider (SP) network, or other networks, the eDNS server responds by transmitting the network address of one of a plurality ofservice servers eDNS server 320 may select the respective server based on one or more selection criteria such as the order of priority of the servers, the server nearest to the client device, the quality of service provided by a particular server, and/or the availability of a server. Theclient device 300 may then transmit service requests, via thenetwork 310, that include the actual network address of the server that will service the client. - The client typically supplies a service request to the eDNS server that at least includes the service type requested and a domain name. The client may also provide a service-level class request, i.e. request a preferential level of services, wherein the client also provides an identifier that can be mapped to the database associated with a particular domain name. The domain name can have its own collection of service classes subject to further standardization. The client may have also already gone to a services database and requested a service-level authorization, such as for preferential treatment by the server that will provide the service requested by the client or by the network itself. In such a case, the client will provide a service authorization “handle” that the eDNS server can use to verify the service-level agreement and to verify the identity of the client.
- The eDNS server also has information from/about the target provider, e.g. explicit knowledge of multiple server IP addresses, server “health”, server weighting, server location, etc., that was negotiated and/or communicated. When the server or the network is offering the client an enhanced service level, the eDNS server sends the client an authorization handle to use when going out over the network, along with a protocol directive on how to proceed. In determining which IP address, and port number, and other authorizations or directives to return to the client, the eDNS server takes into account the client information as well as the server information. The eDNS server may also implement other features such as round-robin load balancing among available servers for a particular service in the absence of any specific directive.
- The service servers also communicate “health” information about its state of operation to the other servers that are providing a particular service, even if the servers are geographically separated. The information is used to help each application on the servers to properly load balance and to potentially recover from application level, network level, or server hardware failures by redirecting clients and by updating eDNS servers with new health information.
- Further, if the selected server subsequently becomes unavailable during a session with the client device, the server may “hand-off” operation to another one of the servers by transmitting messages to the new server, either via the network or by a direct connection with the new server, and to the client device, via the network. The server then notifies the eDNS server of its unavailability. Thus, when a server becomes overloaded, must be brought down for maintenance or because of operational problems, or wishes to transfer the client to a server better suited for a particular service or a particular client, the server is capable of handing the client device off to another server without interrupting the session at the client device.
- FIG. 4 depicts another example of the invention in which protocols of the invention permit a client device or a server to select from one or more quality of service (QoS) levels as well as provide the functions carried out the network of FIG. 3. The quality of service levels may include different server quality of service levels, such as whether to provide web pages or other network services that have enhanced features or whether to use a better class of server having a lower latency and/or that handles fewer connections. Alternatively, the class of service levels may include different network quality of service levels, such as the amount of network bandwidth used, etc.
- A
services database server 460 stores information concerning the quality of service that is permitted to each of various client devices and servers. The services data base server receives requests from thenetwork 410 and/or from theservers server 460 verifies whether such permission exist and transmits a response to the network and/or the server. The services database server may also receive requests from theservers - FIG. 5 illustrates an example of the Internet protocol of an existing network, such as is shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. A user enters a request for a domain name or a URL using a client device browser program, or using an other HTTP request, FTP request or Telnet request, or other Internet protocol request and the client device transmits an Address Lookup Request to the DNS that request the IP address or other network address of the server that services the requested domain name or URL. The DNS returns the IP address or other network address of the server or, when more than one server services the requested domain name or URL, the DNS transmits the IP address or other network address of a content switch or similar network device. The client device may then transmit service requests, such as requests for Web pages or other network services, to the server, content switch, or other network device using the address supplied to it by the DNS. When the request is received, a response to the service request is sent from the server to the client device.
- FIGS. 6, 7,8 and 9 illustrate examples of protocols of the invention.
- A Universal Resource Locator (URL) is used instead of the domain name. The URL includes a protocol specification, e.g. “http:”, a domain name, e.g. www.yahoo.com, and an optional port number, e.g. “8080”, in the form of “http://www.yahoo.com:8080”, for example. By using a URL, both the mapping class, i.e. the domain name, and the service type, i.e. the protocol and port specification, are available so that the eDNS server knows what the client is attempting to do. For example, a single domain name, i.e. a collection of servers, may provide several different services, such as a sub-set of a server farm that provides FTP services while the entire server farm is provides HTTP services. Thus, the domain name and the service name are used as input for mapping to an IP address.
- The eDNS server returns the IP address and port number of server that provides the service requested by the client. Alternatively, the eDNS server returns the IP address and port number based on a service-level agreement looked up in a database, namely a preferred client gets connected to a server port8000 rather than the standard port 80 for an HTTP request so that it is given a different priority or a different look and/or feel.
- FIG. 6 illustrates an example of a network protocol of the invention for basic transactions. First, one or more service servers that are available to provide the same service, such as
Server 1 andServer 2, inform the eDNS server that they are available to accept service requests. The available servers each transmit a message, such as a Register Server request, that includes the domain name, the network address of the service server and the services that the service server accepts. The servers may also provide authentication and non-repudiation information to the eDNS server that establishes the validity of the server for serving the domain name. When a service server is authenticated, the eDNS server transmits a message toServer 1 orServer 2 that its authentication and non-repudiation has been accepted and adds the address of the server to a list of network addresses of servers that are available to provide the service. - Subsequently, when a client device desires to access a service and sends a request to the eDNS for a network address that corresponds to the domain name, the eDNS may first access the services database to determine whether there are any special permissions or denials that are associated with the client. As an example, the services database may recognize that the client is a frequent user of the requested service, is a prior customer of the requested service, or has paid for a higher quality form of the service, and notifies the eDNS to respond to the client device with a network address of a server that provides the higher quality service. Alternatively, the services database recognizes that the client is an undesired client and informs the eDNS server accordingly so that the eDNS server returns the network address of a server that provides lesser quality service or denies the request of the client device. As a further alternative, the services database may not recognize the client device and informs the eDNS server to respond with the network address of the server that provides standard service.
- The client device may then transmit one or more Service Requests to the network address provided by the eDNS server. The Service Requests are delivered to the selected server which, in turn, delivers one or more responses to the client device. The service server may also, prior to responding to the service request of the client device, transmit a request to the services database to verify that the quality of service requested by the client device is permitted to the client device and, based on the response received from the services database, deliver or deny the requested quality of service to the client device.
- FIG. 7 illustrates an example of a protocol for carrying out a server to server hand-off of a client device in accordance with the invention. As described above, the client device requests a network address of a server that provides a service and receives the network address of a service server, such as
Server 1. After the client device has transmitted one or more Service Requests to theServer 1 and has received responses thereto,Server 1 transfers communication with the client to another server.Server 1 first transmits a request to a local database (not shown) or to the eDNS server to determine the network address of the next available server and, as an example, receives the address ofServer 2.Server 1 transmits a Handoff Request toServer 2 that may include information about the client. The client information may include cookie or other state information, security information, transaction state information such as the client's shopping cart, or other Open Standard Interconnection (OSI) reference model layers 4 or layers 5-7 protocol information. WhenServer 2 is available,Server 2 sends a Handoff Acknowledge message toServer 1.Server 1 then transmits a message, such as a Redirection Notice, that informs the client that future service requests to the service are to be sent to the network address ofServer 2. The client may then send Service Request to the network address ofServer 2 and receive responses thereto fromServer 2. - Further,
Server 1 may also send a message to the eDNS server, such as an Availability Update, that informs the eDNS server that it is no longer available to serve that given domain name. The eDNS server then updates its database and replies with a message indicating that the update was accepted. - As an example,
Server 1 transmits a Handoff Request toServer 2, as described above, whenServer 1 is overloaded with requests, needs to shut down for routine maintenance or to correct an operational problem, or wishes to upgrade or downgrade the server quality of service provided to the client. - FIG. 8 depicts an example of a protocol for carrying out a server-initiated network quality of service (QoS) transaction according to the invention. After a client transmits a request to the eDNS server for a network address corresponding to a desired service and receives the network address as described above, the client transmits a Service Request to the service server. The service server sends a response to the Service Request that includes a message, such as a “Quality of Service Pending” message, that informs the client that the server is determining the network quality of service level that is associated with the client. At the same time, or shortly thereafter, the server transmits a message to the services database to determine the network quality of service that the client is permitted to receive. The service server may also request that the services database provide it with the server quality of service that the client is permitted. The services database then looks up the client in its database and informs the service server of the quality of service level associated with the client.
- Then, the service server transmits a request to at least one network element of the network that asks the network element to provide the associated quality of service for all communication between the service server and the client. The network element may also determine whether the client is entitled to receive the desired quality of service and whether the server is permitted to make such a request by transmitting a verification message to the services database. When verification is received from the services database, the network element transmits a message to the service server indicating that its request was accepted.
- Thereafter, the service server transmits a message to the client, such as a “Quality of Service Setup Done” message, that informs the client of the network quality of service level that it is to receive. The service server, at this time, may also handoff the client to another server that provides the desired quality of service level, as described above, and inform the client of the new network address together with the quality of service level.
- The level of network quality of service may be transparent to the user of the client device or, alternatively, may be displayed to the user at a location on a display screen of the browser program or other program.
- The Quality of Service Setup Done message may be sent to the client while the client is receiving a response to an earlier Service Request from the server, such as when the client is receiving a Web page from the server. The client may then continue receiving the services or the Web pages using the new quality of service level, and possibly from another server, in “mid-byte stream” without interruption.
- Thereafter, the client may transmit further Service Requests using the new quality of service level and receive responses accordingly.
- FIG. 9 illustrates an example of a protocol for a quality of service level transaction that is initiated by the client. After the client sends a request to the eDNS server for a network address that corresponds to a desired service and receives the network address from the eDNS server, as described above, the client transmits a request for a desired network quality of service level to the network.
- At least one network element of the network transmits a verification request to the services database to determine whether the client is permitted to receive service at the desired quality of service level. The services database determines whether the client is entitled to the desired quality of service level and notifies the network element accordingly. When the quality of service level request is accepted, the network element delivers a message to the client that the request has been granted. Thereafter, the client may transmit Service Requests using the granted quality of service level to the service server and receives responses thereto from the service server.
- The service server, before transmitting a grant or deny response to the client, may also transmit a request to the services database to verify that the client is entitled to receive network and/or server quality of service at the desired level.
- Thus, by distributing the application switching and content switching functions over the network, the protocols of the invention provide the network with, for example, the flexibility to provide a client with one of a plurality of servers that correspond to a requested domain name based on the availability of a server, the location of a server, the server quality of service that is to be provided to the client and/or the network quality of service to be provided to the client. As a further example, the protocols of the invention enable a server to readily handoff a client to another server as needed or to provide the client with a different server quality of service or network quality of service. The handoff may be carried out in a manner that is transparent to the client. As an additional example, the protocols of the invention permit the ready determination and verification of the service and the network quality of service network levels to which a client and/or a server is entitled.
- The invention also permits geographic positioning of the service servers to be included in routing decisions. As an example, the servers of a “server farm” may be distributed geographically. The eDNS server may take into account the physical distance between the client and the service server when selecting a respective service server. The geographical information may be included in the network protocols. As a result, a company that provides a service may have multiple points of presence across a nation, across a continent, or across the globe so that customers in particular geographic regions are preferentially routed to the nearest point of presence. When the nearest point of presence is overloaded or malfunctioning, the client is alternatively redirected to another point of presence.
- Additionally, the protocols of the invention permit one of a plurality of eDNS servers to function as a “master” server for particular service or domain name. The master server ensures that any cached entries for the domain name or service are correctly updated in the other eDNS servers. The master server also propagates changes in the server mappings, the “health” of respective servers and the weighting of the service servers to the other eDNS servers.
- Although the present invention has been described in relation to particular embodiments thereof, many other variations and modifications and other uses may become apparent to those skilled in the art. It is preferred, therefore, that the present invention be limited not by this specific disclosure herein, but only by the appended claims.
Claims (62)
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/751,189 US7421489B2 (en) | 2000-12-29 | 2000-12-29 | Network protocols for distributing functions within a network |
CA2433261A CA2433261C (en) | 2000-12-29 | 2001-12-20 | Network protocols for distributing functions within a network |
PCT/IB2001/002635 WO2002054705A2 (en) | 2000-12-29 | 2001-12-20 | Network protocols for distributing functions within a network |
EP01272761A EP1382175A2 (en) | 2000-12-29 | 2001-12-20 | Network protocols for distributing functions within a network |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/751,189 US7421489B2 (en) | 2000-12-29 | 2000-12-29 | Network protocols for distributing functions within a network |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20020087707A1 true US20020087707A1 (en) | 2002-07-04 |
US7421489B2 US7421489B2 (en) | 2008-09-02 |
Family
ID=25020882
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/751,189 Expired - Fee Related US7421489B2 (en) | 2000-12-29 | 2000-12-29 | Network protocols for distributing functions within a network |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7421489B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1382175A2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2433261C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2002054705A2 (en) |
Cited By (35)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020147840A1 (en) * | 2001-04-05 | 2002-10-10 | Mutton James Andrew | Distributed link processing system for delivering application and multi-media content on the internet |
US20020188757A1 (en) * | 2001-06-01 | 2002-12-12 | Yoon Ki J. | Method for resolution services of special domain names |
US20030027554A1 (en) * | 2000-08-02 | 2003-02-06 | Serge Haumont | Determining services accessible via a subscription in a communication system |
US20030105873A1 (en) * | 2001-11-30 | 2003-06-05 | Oracle Corporation | Servicing requests that are issued in a protocol other than the protocol expected by the service |
WO2003052615A1 (en) * | 2001-12-18 | 2003-06-26 | Ebay Inc. | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
US20040030801A1 (en) * | 2002-06-14 | 2004-02-12 | Moran Timothy L. | Method and system for a client to invoke a named service |
US20040128386A1 (en) * | 2002-09-11 | 2004-07-01 | Masao Oomoto | Service providing method |
US20050025155A1 (en) * | 2001-10-19 | 2005-02-03 | Belhassen Jerbi | Method for carrying out instant messaging with packet switched data |
US20050246187A1 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2005-11-03 | Reed Maltzman | System and method to facilitate differentiated levels of service in a network-based marketplace |
US6968389B1 (en) * | 2001-07-17 | 2005-11-22 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System and method for qualifying requests in a network |
US20050286535A1 (en) * | 2004-06-29 | 2005-12-29 | Shrum Edgar V Jr | Verification of consumer equipment connected to packet networks based on hashing values |
US20060117038A1 (en) * | 2004-12-01 | 2006-06-01 | John Toebes | Arrangement for selecting a server to provide distributed services from among multiple servers based on a location of a client device |
US7219122B1 (en) * | 2001-04-23 | 2007-05-15 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Software service handoff mechanism with a performance reliability improvement mechanism (PRIM) for a collaborative client-server system |
US20070143454A1 (en) * | 2005-12-21 | 2007-06-21 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System for automatic configuration of computers in a server farm |
US20080034097A1 (en) * | 2005-05-11 | 2008-02-07 | Sony Corporation | Server Device, Inter-Server Device Connection Method, Program, And Recording Medium |
US7523170B1 (en) * | 2002-06-24 | 2009-04-21 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Service locator technique implemented in a data network |
WO2009157831A1 (en) * | 2008-06-25 | 2009-12-30 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Service brokering using domain name servers |
US7685312B1 (en) * | 2005-02-10 | 2010-03-23 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Resource location by address space allocation |
US7707289B1 (en) * | 2000-01-31 | 2010-04-27 | F5 Networks, Inc. | Method and system for enabling persistent access to virtual servers by an LDNS server |
WO2011059770A2 (en) | 2009-11-11 | 2011-05-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Smart client routing |
US20110138019A1 (en) * | 2009-12-09 | 2011-06-09 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | System and method for providing multi-layered content using plurality of servers |
EP2437470A1 (en) * | 2010-09-30 | 2012-04-04 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Network element and method for deriving quality of service data from a distributed hierarchical naming system |
US20120174147A1 (en) * | 2004-02-18 | 2012-07-05 | Thorsten Lohmar | Method and device for reliable broadcast |
US20120259997A1 (en) * | 2002-03-07 | 2012-10-11 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for redirecting requests for content |
US20120317207A1 (en) * | 2011-06-10 | 2012-12-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Directing Messages Based On Domain Names |
US8635305B1 (en) * | 2001-12-19 | 2014-01-21 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Mechanisms for providing differentiated services within a web cache |
WO2014086398A1 (en) * | 2012-12-04 | 2014-06-12 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Method and device for an adaptive handling of data traffic |
EP2922275A1 (en) * | 2014-03-18 | 2015-09-23 | Axis AB | Tunnel broker in a service oriented architecture |
US20170163729A1 (en) * | 2015-12-03 | 2017-06-08 | Christopher Balz | System, method, and apparatus for providing and utilizing a link metadata system for the internet |
CN109067936A (en) * | 2018-09-05 | 2018-12-21 | 网宿科技股份有限公司 | A kind of method and device of domain name mapping |
CN112769970A (en) * | 2020-12-16 | 2021-05-07 | 上海牙木通讯技术有限公司 | Method and system for DNS ECS intelligent transparent transmission |
CN113285920A (en) * | 2021-04-20 | 2021-08-20 | 北京奇艺世纪科技有限公司 | Service access method, device, equipment and storage medium |
US11277373B2 (en) * | 2019-07-24 | 2022-03-15 | Lookout, Inc. | Security during domain name resolution and browsing |
US11290548B2 (en) * | 2019-04-12 | 2022-03-29 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and system for discovering edge-server or edge-service through domain name server (DNS) resolution |
US20230239344A1 (en) * | 2022-01-21 | 2023-07-27 | Dell Products, L.P. | Distributed network address discovery in non-uniform networks |
Citations (41)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5740371A (en) * | 1995-09-30 | 1998-04-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Load balancing of connections to parallel servers |
US5774660A (en) * | 1996-08-05 | 1998-06-30 | Resonate, Inc. | World-wide-web server with delayed resource-binding for resource-based load balancing on a distributed resource multi-node network |
US6092178A (en) * | 1998-09-03 | 2000-07-18 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | System for responding to a resource request |
US6108703A (en) * | 1998-07-14 | 2000-08-22 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Global hosting system |
US6134588A (en) * | 1997-11-12 | 2000-10-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | High availability web browser access to servers |
US6173322B1 (en) * | 1997-06-05 | 2001-01-09 | Silicon Graphics, Inc. | Network request distribution based on static rules and dynamic performance data |
US6185619B1 (en) * | 1996-12-09 | 2001-02-06 | Genuity Inc. | Method and apparatus for balancing the process load on network servers according to network and serve based policies |
US6205477B1 (en) * | 1998-10-20 | 2001-03-20 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Apparatus and method for performing traffic redirection in a distributed system using a portion metric |
US6223292B1 (en) * | 1997-07-15 | 2001-04-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Authorization systems, methods, and computer program products |
US6249801B1 (en) * | 1998-07-15 | 2001-06-19 | Radware Ltd. | Load balancing |
US6304969B1 (en) * | 1999-03-16 | 2001-10-16 | Webiv Networks, Inc. | Verification of server authorization to provide network resources |
US6314465B1 (en) * | 1999-03-11 | 2001-11-06 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for load sharing on a wide area network |
US6317775B1 (en) * | 1995-11-03 | 2001-11-13 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System for distributing load over multiple servers at an internet site |
US6324582B1 (en) * | 1997-07-01 | 2001-11-27 | Sitara Networks, Inc. | Enhanced network communication |
US6324580B1 (en) * | 1998-09-03 | 2001-11-27 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Load balancing for replicated services |
US20010047415A1 (en) * | 2000-01-31 | 2001-11-29 | Skene Bryan D. | Method and system for enabling persistent access to virtual servers by an ldns server |
US20010049741A1 (en) * | 1999-06-18 | 2001-12-06 | Bryan D. Skene | Method and system for balancing load distribution on a wide area network |
US6332158B1 (en) * | 1998-12-03 | 2001-12-18 | Chris Risley | Domain name system lookup allowing intelligent correction of searches and presentation of auxiliary information |
US20020040400A1 (en) * | 1999-07-15 | 2002-04-04 | F5 Networks, Inc. | Method and system for storing load balancing information with an HTTP cookie |
US6446108B1 (en) * | 1997-07-18 | 2002-09-03 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method for wide area network service location |
US6446121B1 (en) * | 1998-05-26 | 2002-09-03 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System and method for measuring round trip times in a network using a TCP packet |
US6449647B1 (en) * | 1997-08-01 | 2002-09-10 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | Content-aware switching of network packets |
US6448108B1 (en) * | 2000-10-02 | 2002-09-10 | Charles W. C. Lin | Method of making a semiconductor chip assembly with a conductive trace subtractively formed before and after chip attachment |
US20020138649A1 (en) * | 2000-10-04 | 2002-09-26 | Brian Cartmell | Providing services and information based on a request that includes a unique identifier |
US6470389B1 (en) * | 1997-03-14 | 2002-10-22 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Hosting a network service on a cluster of servers using a single-address image |
US6553420B1 (en) * | 1998-03-13 | 2003-04-22 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Method and apparatus for distributing requests among a plurality of resources |
US20030097443A1 (en) * | 2001-11-21 | 2003-05-22 | Richard Gillett | Systems and methods for delivering content over a network |
US6574229B1 (en) * | 1998-10-23 | 2003-06-03 | Fujitsu Limited | Wide area load distribution apparatus and method |
US6577628B1 (en) * | 1999-06-30 | 2003-06-10 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Providing quality of service (QoS) in a network environment in which client connections are maintained for limited periods of time |
US6590861B1 (en) * | 1999-03-18 | 2003-07-08 | 3Com Corporation | Combining virtual local area networks and load balancing with fault tolerance in a high performance protocol |
US6594637B1 (en) * | 1998-09-14 | 2003-07-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Schedule management system and method |
US20030135613A1 (en) * | 2001-12-27 | 2003-07-17 | Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. | Network system, information management server, and information management method |
US6859806B1 (en) * | 2000-07-21 | 2005-02-22 | Ideapath Inc. | System and method for legal docketing using a customizable rules subset |
US6898569B1 (en) * | 1998-06-02 | 2005-05-24 | At&T Corp. | Method and apparatus for advanced scheduling and messaging system |
US6918089B2 (en) * | 2000-07-11 | 2005-07-12 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Schedule management system |
US6925603B1 (en) * | 1999-09-27 | 2005-08-02 | Fujitsu Limited | Apparatus and method for presenting schedule information depending on situation |
US20050207439A1 (en) * | 2004-03-19 | 2005-09-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for dynamically scheduling requests |
US6952732B2 (en) * | 2001-04-30 | 2005-10-04 | Blue Pumpkin Software, Inc. | Method and apparatus for multi-contact scheduling |
US6968389B1 (en) * | 2001-07-17 | 2005-11-22 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System and method for qualifying requests in a network |
US6973507B2 (en) * | 2001-06-01 | 2005-12-06 | Nitgen Technologies, Inc. | Method for resolution services of special domain names |
US20060129665A1 (en) * | 2004-12-01 | 2006-06-15 | John Toebes | Arrangement in a server for providing dynamic domain name system services for each received request |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6327622B1 (en) * | 1998-09-03 | 2001-12-04 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Load balancing in a network environment |
-
2000
- 2000-12-29 US US09/751,189 patent/US7421489B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2001
- 2001-12-20 CA CA2433261A patent/CA2433261C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2001-12-20 WO PCT/IB2001/002635 patent/WO2002054705A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2001-12-20 EP EP01272761A patent/EP1382175A2/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (41)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5740371A (en) * | 1995-09-30 | 1998-04-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Load balancing of connections to parallel servers |
US6317775B1 (en) * | 1995-11-03 | 2001-11-13 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System for distributing load over multiple servers at an internet site |
US5774660A (en) * | 1996-08-05 | 1998-06-30 | Resonate, Inc. | World-wide-web server with delayed resource-binding for resource-based load balancing on a distributed resource multi-node network |
US6185619B1 (en) * | 1996-12-09 | 2001-02-06 | Genuity Inc. | Method and apparatus for balancing the process load on network servers according to network and serve based policies |
US6470389B1 (en) * | 1997-03-14 | 2002-10-22 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Hosting a network service on a cluster of servers using a single-address image |
US6173322B1 (en) * | 1997-06-05 | 2001-01-09 | Silicon Graphics, Inc. | Network request distribution based on static rules and dynamic performance data |
US6324582B1 (en) * | 1997-07-01 | 2001-11-27 | Sitara Networks, Inc. | Enhanced network communication |
US6223292B1 (en) * | 1997-07-15 | 2001-04-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Authorization systems, methods, and computer program products |
US6446108B1 (en) * | 1997-07-18 | 2002-09-03 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method for wide area network service location |
US6449647B1 (en) * | 1997-08-01 | 2002-09-10 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | Content-aware switching of network packets |
US6134588A (en) * | 1997-11-12 | 2000-10-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | High availability web browser access to servers |
US6553420B1 (en) * | 1998-03-13 | 2003-04-22 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Method and apparatus for distributing requests among a plurality of resources |
US6446121B1 (en) * | 1998-05-26 | 2002-09-03 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System and method for measuring round trip times in a network using a TCP packet |
US6898569B1 (en) * | 1998-06-02 | 2005-05-24 | At&T Corp. | Method and apparatus for advanced scheduling and messaging system |
US6108703A (en) * | 1998-07-14 | 2000-08-22 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Global hosting system |
US6249801B1 (en) * | 1998-07-15 | 2001-06-19 | Radware Ltd. | Load balancing |
US6324580B1 (en) * | 1998-09-03 | 2001-11-27 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Load balancing for replicated services |
US6092178A (en) * | 1998-09-03 | 2000-07-18 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | System for responding to a resource request |
US6594637B1 (en) * | 1998-09-14 | 2003-07-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Schedule management system and method |
US6205477B1 (en) * | 1998-10-20 | 2001-03-20 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Apparatus and method for performing traffic redirection in a distributed system using a portion metric |
US6574229B1 (en) * | 1998-10-23 | 2003-06-03 | Fujitsu Limited | Wide area load distribution apparatus and method |
US6332158B1 (en) * | 1998-12-03 | 2001-12-18 | Chris Risley | Domain name system lookup allowing intelligent correction of searches and presentation of auxiliary information |
US6314465B1 (en) * | 1999-03-11 | 2001-11-06 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for load sharing on a wide area network |
US6304969B1 (en) * | 1999-03-16 | 2001-10-16 | Webiv Networks, Inc. | Verification of server authorization to provide network resources |
US6590861B1 (en) * | 1999-03-18 | 2003-07-08 | 3Com Corporation | Combining virtual local area networks and load balancing with fault tolerance in a high performance protocol |
US20010049741A1 (en) * | 1999-06-18 | 2001-12-06 | Bryan D. Skene | Method and system for balancing load distribution on a wide area network |
US6577628B1 (en) * | 1999-06-30 | 2003-06-10 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Providing quality of service (QoS) in a network environment in which client connections are maintained for limited periods of time |
US20020040400A1 (en) * | 1999-07-15 | 2002-04-04 | F5 Networks, Inc. | Method and system for storing load balancing information with an HTTP cookie |
US6925603B1 (en) * | 1999-09-27 | 2005-08-02 | Fujitsu Limited | Apparatus and method for presenting schedule information depending on situation |
US20010047415A1 (en) * | 2000-01-31 | 2001-11-29 | Skene Bryan D. | Method and system for enabling persistent access to virtual servers by an ldns server |
US6918089B2 (en) * | 2000-07-11 | 2005-07-12 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Schedule management system |
US6859806B1 (en) * | 2000-07-21 | 2005-02-22 | Ideapath Inc. | System and method for legal docketing using a customizable rules subset |
US6448108B1 (en) * | 2000-10-02 | 2002-09-10 | Charles W. C. Lin | Method of making a semiconductor chip assembly with a conductive trace subtractively formed before and after chip attachment |
US20020138649A1 (en) * | 2000-10-04 | 2002-09-26 | Brian Cartmell | Providing services and information based on a request that includes a unique identifier |
US6952732B2 (en) * | 2001-04-30 | 2005-10-04 | Blue Pumpkin Software, Inc. | Method and apparatus for multi-contact scheduling |
US6973507B2 (en) * | 2001-06-01 | 2005-12-06 | Nitgen Technologies, Inc. | Method for resolution services of special domain names |
US6968389B1 (en) * | 2001-07-17 | 2005-11-22 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System and method for qualifying requests in a network |
US20030097443A1 (en) * | 2001-11-21 | 2003-05-22 | Richard Gillett | Systems and methods for delivering content over a network |
US20030135613A1 (en) * | 2001-12-27 | 2003-07-17 | Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. | Network system, information management server, and information management method |
US20050207439A1 (en) * | 2004-03-19 | 2005-09-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for dynamically scheduling requests |
US20060129665A1 (en) * | 2004-12-01 | 2006-06-15 | John Toebes | Arrangement in a server for providing dynamic domain name system services for each received request |
Cited By (76)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7707289B1 (en) * | 2000-01-31 | 2010-04-27 | F5 Networks, Inc. | Method and system for enabling persistent access to virtual servers by an LDNS server |
US20030027554A1 (en) * | 2000-08-02 | 2003-02-06 | Serge Haumont | Determining services accessible via a subscription in a communication system |
US7764773B2 (en) * | 2000-08-02 | 2010-07-27 | Nokia Corporation | Determining services accessible via a subscription in a communication system |
US20020147840A1 (en) * | 2001-04-05 | 2002-10-10 | Mutton James Andrew | Distributed link processing system for delivering application and multi-media content on the internet |
US7739327B2 (en) * | 2001-04-05 | 2010-06-15 | Playstream Inc. | Distributed link processing system for delivering application and multi-media content on the internet |
US7219122B1 (en) * | 2001-04-23 | 2007-05-15 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Software service handoff mechanism with a performance reliability improvement mechanism (PRIM) for a collaborative client-server system |
US6973507B2 (en) * | 2001-06-01 | 2005-12-06 | Nitgen Technologies, Inc. | Method for resolution services of special domain names |
US20020188757A1 (en) * | 2001-06-01 | 2002-12-12 | Yoon Ki J. | Method for resolution services of special domain names |
US6968389B1 (en) * | 2001-07-17 | 2005-11-22 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System and method for qualifying requests in a network |
US9306772B2 (en) * | 2001-10-19 | 2016-04-05 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for carrying out instant messaging with packet switched data |
US20050025155A1 (en) * | 2001-10-19 | 2005-02-03 | Belhassen Jerbi | Method for carrying out instant messaging with packet switched data |
US20030105873A1 (en) * | 2001-11-30 | 2003-06-05 | Oracle Corporation | Servicing requests that are issued in a protocol other than the protocol expected by the service |
US8285880B2 (en) * | 2001-11-30 | 2012-10-09 | Oracle International Corporation | Servicing requests that are issued in a protocol other than the protocol expected by the service |
US8769026B2 (en) | 2001-11-30 | 2014-07-01 | Oracle International Corporation | Servicing requests that are issued in a protocol other than the protocol expected by the service |
US9589289B2 (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2017-03-07 | Paypal, Inc. | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
US8108518B2 (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2012-01-31 | Ebay Inc. | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
US8918505B2 (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2014-12-23 | Ebay Inc. | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
US7305469B2 (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2007-12-04 | Ebay Inc. | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
US20040133478A1 (en) * | 2001-12-18 | 2004-07-08 | Scott Leahy | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
US20080046279A1 (en) * | 2001-12-18 | 2008-02-21 | Ebay Inc. | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
US8239533B2 (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2012-08-07 | Ebay Inc. | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
US9679323B2 (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2017-06-13 | Paypal, Inc. | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
US8793375B2 (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2014-07-29 | Ebay Inc. | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
US9508094B2 (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2016-11-29 | Paypal, Inc. | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
WO2003052615A1 (en) * | 2001-12-18 | 2003-06-26 | Ebay Inc. | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
US9626705B2 (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2017-04-18 | Paypal, Inc. | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
US8635305B1 (en) * | 2001-12-19 | 2014-01-21 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Mechanisms for providing differentiated services within a web cache |
US8504720B2 (en) * | 2002-03-07 | 2013-08-06 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for redirecting requests for content |
US20120259997A1 (en) * | 2002-03-07 | 2012-10-11 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for redirecting requests for content |
US20040030801A1 (en) * | 2002-06-14 | 2004-02-12 | Moran Timothy L. | Method and system for a client to invoke a named service |
US7523170B1 (en) * | 2002-06-24 | 2009-04-21 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Service locator technique implemented in a data network |
US20040128386A1 (en) * | 2002-09-11 | 2004-07-01 | Masao Oomoto | Service providing method |
US9049035B2 (en) * | 2004-02-18 | 2015-06-02 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Erisson (Publ) | Method and device for reliable broadcast |
US20120174147A1 (en) * | 2004-02-18 | 2012-07-05 | Thorsten Lohmar | Method and device for reliable broadcast |
US9787802B2 (en) | 2004-02-18 | 2017-10-10 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Technique for reliable bulk data delivery |
US20050246187A1 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2005-11-03 | Reed Maltzman | System and method to facilitate differentiated levels of service in a network-based marketplace |
US20050286535A1 (en) * | 2004-06-29 | 2005-12-29 | Shrum Edgar V Jr | Verification of consumer equipment connected to packet networks based on hashing values |
US20060117038A1 (en) * | 2004-12-01 | 2006-06-01 | John Toebes | Arrangement for selecting a server to provide distributed services from among multiple servers based on a location of a client device |
US20060116988A1 (en) * | 2004-12-01 | 2006-06-01 | John Toebes | Arrangement for selecting a server to provide distributed services from among multiple servers based on a location of a client device |
US7747720B2 (en) | 2004-12-01 | 2010-06-29 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Arrangement for selecting a server to provide distributed services from among multiple servers based on a location of a client device |
US20100250668A1 (en) * | 2004-12-01 | 2010-09-30 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Arrangement for selecting a server to provide distributed services from among multiple servers based on a location of a client device |
US7792989B2 (en) * | 2004-12-01 | 2010-09-07 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Arrangement for selecting a server to provide distributed services from among multiple servers based on a location of a client device |
US7685312B1 (en) * | 2005-02-10 | 2010-03-23 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Resource location by address space allocation |
KR101264816B1 (en) | 2005-05-11 | 2013-05-15 | 소니 주식회사 | Server device inter-server device connection method program and recording medium |
US7856504B2 (en) * | 2005-05-11 | 2010-12-21 | Sony Corporation | Server device, inter-server device connection method, program, and recording medium |
US20080034097A1 (en) * | 2005-05-11 | 2008-02-07 | Sony Corporation | Server Device, Inter-Server Device Connection Method, Program, And Recording Medium |
US8756298B2 (en) * | 2005-12-21 | 2014-06-17 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System for automatic configuration of computers in a server farm |
US20070143454A1 (en) * | 2005-12-21 | 2007-06-21 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System for automatic configuration of computers in a server farm |
WO2009157831A1 (en) * | 2008-06-25 | 2009-12-30 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Service brokering using domain name servers |
US8812377B2 (en) | 2008-06-25 | 2014-08-19 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Service brokering using domain name servers |
US20110145103A1 (en) * | 2008-06-25 | 2011-06-16 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Service Brokering using Domain Name Servers |
WO2011059770A2 (en) | 2009-11-11 | 2011-05-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Smart client routing |
EP2499787A4 (en) * | 2009-11-11 | 2015-06-03 | Microsoft Technology Licensing Llc | INTELLIGENT CLIENT ROUTING |
US20110138019A1 (en) * | 2009-12-09 | 2011-06-09 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | System and method for providing multi-layered content using plurality of servers |
US9344348B2 (en) * | 2010-09-30 | 2016-05-17 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Managing the quality of service levels (QoS) of network traffic |
EP2437470A1 (en) * | 2010-09-30 | 2012-04-04 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Network element and method for deriving quality of service data from a distributed hierarchical naming system |
WO2012042190A1 (en) * | 2010-09-30 | 2012-04-05 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Deriving quality of service data from a distributed hierarchical naming system |
US20130191537A1 (en) * | 2010-09-30 | 2013-07-25 | Anton Radostinovinch Ivanov | Communications network |
US20120317207A1 (en) * | 2011-06-10 | 2012-12-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Directing Messages Based On Domain Names |
US8874668B2 (en) * | 2011-06-10 | 2014-10-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Directing messages based on domain names |
WO2014086398A1 (en) * | 2012-12-04 | 2014-06-12 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Method and device for an adaptive handling of data traffic |
US9992288B2 (en) | 2012-12-04 | 2018-06-05 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Method and device for an adaptive handling of data traffic |
EP2922275A1 (en) * | 2014-03-18 | 2015-09-23 | Axis AB | Tunnel broker in a service oriented architecture |
US9860325B2 (en) | 2014-03-18 | 2018-01-02 | Axis Ab | Tunnel broker in a service oriented architecture |
US20170163729A1 (en) * | 2015-12-03 | 2017-06-08 | Christopher Balz | System, method, and apparatus for providing and utilizing a link metadata system for the internet |
US10904328B2 (en) * | 2015-12-03 | 2021-01-26 | Christopher Balz | System, method, and apparatus for providing and utilizing a link metadata system for the internet |
CN109067936A (en) * | 2018-09-05 | 2018-12-21 | 网宿科技股份有限公司 | A kind of method and device of domain name mapping |
US11290548B2 (en) * | 2019-04-12 | 2022-03-29 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and system for discovering edge-server or edge-service through domain name server (DNS) resolution |
US11962656B2 (en) * | 2019-04-12 | 2024-04-16 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and system for discovering edge-server or edge-service through domain name server (DNS) resolution |
US20220224761A1 (en) * | 2019-04-12 | 2022-07-14 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and system for discovering edge-server or edge-service through domain name server (dns) resolution |
US11277373B2 (en) * | 2019-07-24 | 2022-03-15 | Lookout, Inc. | Security during domain name resolution and browsing |
US11570144B2 (en) | 2019-07-24 | 2023-01-31 | Lookout, Inc. | Protecting client privacy during browsing |
CN112769970A (en) * | 2020-12-16 | 2021-05-07 | 上海牙木通讯技术有限公司 | Method and system for DNS ECS intelligent transparent transmission |
CN113285920A (en) * | 2021-04-20 | 2021-08-20 | 北京奇艺世纪科技有限公司 | Service access method, device, equipment and storage medium |
US20230239344A1 (en) * | 2022-01-21 | 2023-07-27 | Dell Products, L.P. | Distributed network address discovery in non-uniform networks |
US11909816B2 (en) * | 2022-01-21 | 2024-02-20 | Dell Products L.P. | Distributed network address discovery in non-uniform networks |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2002054705A3 (en) | 2003-11-13 |
EP1382175A2 (en) | 2004-01-21 |
WO2002054705A2 (en) | 2002-07-11 |
CA2433261A1 (en) | 2002-07-11 |
US7421489B2 (en) | 2008-09-02 |
CA2433261C (en) | 2011-02-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2433261C (en) | Network protocols for distributing functions within a network | |
US11956299B2 (en) | System providing faster and more efficient data communication | |
US6154777A (en) | System for context-dependent name resolution | |
US7260598B1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for processing client requests in a content distribution network using client lists | |
US7222088B2 (en) | Service system | |
US7043563B2 (en) | Method and system for redirection to arbitrary front-ends in a communication system | |
US7895335B2 (en) | Enabling communications of electronic data between an information requestor and a geographically proximate service provider | |
US20060288119A1 (en) | Multi-level redirection system | |
JP4512192B2 (en) | Congestion control device and network congestion control method | |
US20050228884A1 (en) | Resource management | |
EP1320977B1 (en) | Virtual ip framework and interfacing method | |
KR100375121B1 (en) | Web contents transmission method | |
Cisco | Configuring the CSS Domain Name Service | |
Cisco | Configuring the CSS Domain Name Service | |
WO2001005117A9 (en) | Network with hot button for switched broadband multipoint/multimedia communication | |
JP6717548B2 (en) | Traffic control system and method | |
JP2004302869A (en) | Access management server, network device, network system and access management method | |
JPH04353955A (en) | Server client type communication protocol | |
GARG | Service system | |
AU4276300A (en) | A communications network access method and system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED, CANADA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:STEWART, DANIEL B.;BONTE, JAMES M.;REEL/FRAME:011981/0210;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010326 TO 20010329 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CITIBANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT,NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:AVAYA INC.;REEL/FRAME:023892/0500 Effective date: 20100129 Owner name: CITIBANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:AVAYA INC.;REEL/FRAME:023892/0500 Effective date: 20100129 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CITICORP USA, INC., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:AVAYA INC.;REEL/FRAME:023905/0001 Effective date: 20100129 Owner name: CITICORP USA, INC., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT,NEW YO Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:AVAYA INC.;REEL/FRAME:023905/0001 Effective date: 20100129 Owner name: CITICORP USA, INC., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, NEW Y Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:AVAYA INC.;REEL/FRAME:023905/0001 Effective date: 20100129 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AVAYA INC.,NEW JERSEY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:023998/0878 Effective date: 20091218 Owner name: AVAYA INC., NEW JERSEY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:023998/0878 Effective date: 20091218 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST, NA, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT, THE, PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:AVAYA INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:025863/0535 Effective date: 20110211 Owner name: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST, NA, AS NOTES COLLAT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:AVAYA INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:025863/0535 Effective date: 20110211 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., THE, PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:AVAYA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:030083/0639 Effective date: 20130307 Owner name: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., THE, Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:AVAYA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:030083/0639 Effective date: 20130307 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CITIBANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:AVAYA INC.;AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS INC.;OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:041576/0001 Effective date: 20170124 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION), CALIFORNIA Free format text: BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS INCLUDING THE SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 041576/0001;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:044893/0531 Effective date: 20171128 Owner name: AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS INCLUDING THE SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 041576/0001;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:044893/0531 Effective date: 20171128 Owner name: AVAYA INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS INCLUDING THE SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 025863/0535;ASSIGNOR:THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST, NA;REEL/FRAME:044892/0001 Effective date: 20171128 Owner name: AVAYA INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS INCLUDING THE SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 023892/0500;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:044891/0564 Effective date: 20171128 Owner name: VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS INCLUDING THE SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 041576/0001;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:044893/0531 Effective date: 20171128 Owner name: AVAYA INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS INCLUDING THE SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 041576/0001;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:044893/0531 Effective date: 20171128 Owner name: AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS INC., CALIFORNI Free format text: BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS INCLUDING THE SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 041576/0001;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:044893/0531 Effective date: 20171128 Owner name: OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS OCTEL Free format text: BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS INCLUDING THE SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 041576/0001;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:044893/0531 Effective date: 20171128 Owner name: AVAYA INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS INCLUDING THE SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 030083/0639;ASSIGNOR:THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:045012/0666 Effective date: 20171128 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:AVAYA INC.;AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC;OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:045034/0001 Effective date: 20171215 Owner name: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NEW Y Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:AVAYA INC.;AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC;OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:045034/0001 Effective date: 20171215 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AVAYA, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITICORP USA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:045045/0564 Effective date: 20171215 Owner name: SIERRA HOLDINGS CORP., NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITICORP USA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:045045/0564 Effective date: 20171215 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:AVAYA INC.;AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC;OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:045124/0026 Effective date: 20171215 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, MINNESOTA Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:AVAYA INC.;AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.;INTELLISIST, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:053955/0436 Effective date: 20200925 |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20200902 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC, NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL 45124/FRAME 0026;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:063457/0001 Effective date: 20230403 Owner name: AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P., NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL 45124/FRAME 0026;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:063457/0001 Effective date: 20230403 Owner name: AVAYA INC., NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL 45124/FRAME 0026;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:063457/0001 Effective date: 20230403 Owner name: AVAYA HOLDINGS CORP., NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL 45124/FRAME 0026;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:063457/0001 Effective date: 20230403 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P., NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 045034/0001);ASSIGNOR:GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:063779/0622 Effective date: 20230501 Owner name: CAAS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 045034/0001);ASSIGNOR:GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:063779/0622 Effective date: 20230501 Owner name: HYPERQUALITY II, LLC, NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 045034/0001);ASSIGNOR:GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:063779/0622 Effective date: 20230501 Owner name: HYPERQUALITY, INC., NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 045034/0001);ASSIGNOR:GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:063779/0622 Effective date: 20230501 Owner name: ZANG, INC. (FORMER NAME OF AVAYA CLOUD INC.), NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 045034/0001);ASSIGNOR:GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:063779/0622 Effective date: 20230501 Owner name: VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC., NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 045034/0001);ASSIGNOR:GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:063779/0622 Effective date: 20230501 Owner name: OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC, NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 045034/0001);ASSIGNOR:GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:063779/0622 Effective date: 20230501 Owner name: AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC, NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 045034/0001);ASSIGNOR:GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:063779/0622 Effective date: 20230501 Owner name: INTELLISIST, INC., NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 045034/0001);ASSIGNOR:GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:063779/0622 Effective date: 20230501 Owner name: AVAYA INC., NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 045034/0001);ASSIGNOR:GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:063779/0622 Effective date: 20230501 Owner name: AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC, NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 53955/0436);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:063705/0023 Effective date: 20230501 Owner name: INTELLISIST, INC., NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 53955/0436);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:063705/0023 Effective date: 20230501 Owner name: AVAYA INC., NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 53955/0436);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:063705/0023 Effective date: 20230501 Owner name: AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P., NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 53955/0436);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:063705/0023 Effective date: 20230501 |