US20020033329A1 - Method for maintaining the cleanness of a vacuum chamber of a physical vapor deposition system - Google Patents
Method for maintaining the cleanness of a vacuum chamber of a physical vapor deposition system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20020033329A1 US20020033329A1 US09/725,219 US72521900A US2002033329A1 US 20020033329 A1 US20020033329 A1 US 20020033329A1 US 72521900 A US72521900 A US 72521900A US 2002033329 A1 US2002033329 A1 US 2002033329A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- vacuum chamber
- plasma
- recited
- metal
- mtorr
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 61
- 238000005240 physical vapour deposition Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 17
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 44
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 41
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 41
- 150000002736 metal compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 29
- XKRFYHLGVUSROY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Argon Chemical compound [Ar] XKRFYHLGVUSROY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 24
- 239000011261 inert gas Substances 0.000 claims description 24
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 15
- RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titanium Chemical compound [Ti] RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 12
- NRTOMJZYCJJWKI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titanium nitride Chemical compound [Ti]#N NRTOMJZYCJJWKI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 12
- 229910052786 argon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000010936 titanium Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- 229910052719 titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000002923 metal particle Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000001012 protector Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000007740 vapor deposition Methods 0.000 claims 2
- 235000012431 wafers Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 37
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 abstract description 8
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 10
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 6
- WYEMLYFITZORAB-UHFFFAOYSA-N boscalid Chemical compound C1=CC(Cl)=CC=C1C1=CC=CC=C1NC(=O)C1=CC=CN=C1Cl WYEMLYFITZORAB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000009616 inductively coupled plasma Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000011810 insulating material Substances 0.000 description 2
- -1 nitrogen ions Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005137 deposition process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005684 electric field Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011817 metal compound particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000004433 nitrogen atom Chemical group N* 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000003609 titanium compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
- C23C14/00—Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material
- C23C14/22—Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material characterised by the process of coating
- C23C14/56—Apparatus specially adapted for continuous coating; Arrangements for maintaining the vacuum, e.g. vacuum locks
- C23C14/564—Means for minimising impurities in the coating chamber such as dust, moisture, residual gases
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method for maintaining the cleanness within a vacuum chamber of a physical vapor deposition system, especially a method using plasma burn-in for maintaining the cleanness within a vacuum chamber of a physical vapor deposition system.
- Physical vapor deposition method is one of the commonly used methods for depositing metal compound films in semiconductor processes.
- a metal target is located in a vacuum chamber of the physical vapor deposition system. After supplying a reactive gas and an inert gas into the vacuum chamber and producing a plasma from the reactive gas and the inert gas, the reactive gas derivatives in the plasma react with the metal target, forming metal compound depositing upon a processed wafer.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a vacuum chamber 1 .
- the metal target 4 is made of titanium.
- a process kit 9 is provided in the vacuum chamber 1 to prevent titanium and titanium compound from depositing upon the inner wall 15 of the vacuum chamber 1 .
- a wafer is placed on the susceptor 10 and the reactive gas nitrogen and an inert gas (mostly argon) enter the vacuum chamber 1 through a gas inlet 12 .
- the power supply 14 applies a negative potential on the metal target 4 which is in electrically conductive relationship with an end surface 2 of the vacuum chamber 1 .
- the portions of the vacuum chamber 1 below the insulating material 13 including the opposite end surface 3 , the susceptor 10 , and the processed wafer are all in electrically conductive relationship and are grounded.
- nodules 81 and 82 are protrusive in shape and are not dense structurally, peeling particles from the nodules 81 or 82 are very likely to fall on the processed wafer due to the bombardment of the plasma, thus resulting in failure of the processed wafer.
- the operation pressure of the inert gas plasma for plasma burn-in process is identical to the operation pressure, 3.0 to 4.0 mtorr, for metal compound film deposition of the wafer process.
- the plasma distribution at this operation pressure can not effectively bombard the nodule 82 on the side surface 6 of the metal target.
- the peeling of residue of nodule 82 will still occur and the particle contamination is not substantially improved.
- the titanium nitride film on the metal target surface has been removed by argon bombardment due to the plasma burn-in process and it is not desirable.
- argon and nitrogen are supplied into the vacuum chamber 1 and a plasma is produced from argon and nitrogen to nitridize the bombarded surfaces of the titanium target so that a titanium nitride layer is formed on the titanium target.
- the operation pressure of the plasma from argon and nitrogen is between 3.0 mtorr and 4.0 mtorr.
- the etch of sub-micron scale to the wafer can be achieved since the earlier collision of the particles is avoided.
- ECR Electro Cyclotron Resonance
- ICP Inductive Coupled Plasma
- TCP Transformer Coupled Plasma
- the ion energy and ion density can be further enhanced.
- the TCP9400 series poly etch systems produced by LAM Research Corp. are characterized by their utilization of TCP technology to reach high vacuum and high ion density.
- the trend of improvement of plasma burn-in operation is to achieve high vacuum and high ion density.
- the present invention provides a plasma burn-in method for maintaining the cleanness within a vacuum chamber of a physical vapor deposition.
- the present invention produces a plasma with the operation pressure greater than 10.0 mtorr from an inert gas.
- the plasma distribution at this operation pressure reaches the side surface of the metal target.
- the plasma bombards the nodules within these sections and bombards the metal target to deposit ductile metal film upon the brittle metal compound film.
- the preferable plasma operation pressure is between 15.0 to 30.0 mtorr.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a vacuum chamber
- FIG. 2 illustrates the relationship between the number of particles falling on the wafer and the plasma operation pressure of the plasma burn-in according to the invention
- FIG. 3 illustrates the plasma distribution within the vacuum chamber when using a traditional plasma burn-in method
- FIG. 4 illustrates the plasma distribution within the vacuum chamber when using the plasma burn-in method of the present invention
- FIG. 5 illustrates the statistic graph of the number of particles falling on the wafer sampled every two days when the operation pressure of the plasma burn-in is at 3.0 mtorr and the plasma burn-in operation is performed once every 50 wafers;
- FIG. 6 illustrates the statistic graph of the number of particles falling on the wafer sampled every two days when the operation pressure of the plasma burn-in is at 20.0 mtorr and the plasma burn-in operation is performed once every 125 wafers.
- the present invention provides a burn-in method using plasma for maintaining the cleanness within the vacuum chamber of the physical vapor deposition system.
- the physical vapor deposition system is utilized to deposit a metal compound film upon a wafer during wafer processing, and there is a metal target attached on one end surface of the vacuum chamber.
- the method includes producing a plasma from an inert gas, bombarding a nodule consisting of metal compound particles by the plasma within the vacuum chamber, and bombarding the metal target by the plasma to deposit a metal film upon the metal compound film which is on the inner wall of the vacuum chamber.
- the invented operation pressure during burn-in operation is selected through the following experiment.
- FIG. 2 illustrates the number of particles falling upon the wafer at distinct operation pressures, in which argon is adopted to produce the plasma and the plasma burn-in cycles remain unchanged. For instance, between two successive burn-in operations, there are either 50 or 125 product wafers completed.
- the PVD used to obtain FIG. 2 is Endura High Vacuum produced by Applied Materials Corp. The pressure ranges from 3.0 mtorr to about 30.0 mtorr during experiments. We can observe in FIG. 2 that a sharp falling of particle numbers starts around at 10.0 mtorr and the curve gradually goes flat at about 15.0 mtorr. This phenomenon indicates that when the operation pressure of the plasma burn-in operation is elevated above 10.0 mtorr, the number of particles falling upon the wafer declines substantially.
- FIG. 4 illustrates the plasma distribution within the vacuum chamber when using the plasma burn-in method of the present invention with a plasma operation pressure above 10.0 mtorr.
- the plasma distribution as shown in FIG. 4 easily bombards the nodules 82 located in narrow spaces such as the side surface 6 of the metal target 4 into small particles, and bombards the metal target to generate ductile metal particles.
- the small particles and the ductile metal particles generated are deposited over the inner wall of the vacuum chamber concurrently.
- This invention greatly decreases the number of particles falling off from the residue of nodules 82 during wafer production and can minimize the number of occasions of plasma burn-in required.
- the present invention produces a plasma with operation pressure above 10.0 mtorr from an inert gas within the vacuum chamber 1 .
- the plasma bombards the nodules within the vacuum chamber 1 into small particles and bombards the metal target 4 to generate metal particles so that a ductile metal film is deposited upon the inner surface of the vacuum chamber 1 .
- the metal target 4 is titanium
- the ductile titanium film deposited within the vacuum chamber 1 makes the peeling of titanium nitride film almost impossible.
- FIG. 2 it is shown the descending curve starts to flatten after 15.0 mtorr and further experiments reveal that when the operation pressure is over 30.0 mtorr, the plasma begins to damage the insulating material 13 .
- the preferred plasma operation pressure is between 15.0 and 30.0 mtorr.
- FIG. 5 illustrates the statistic graph of the number of particles falling on the wafer sampled every two days when the operation pressure of the plasma burn-in is at 3.0 mtorr and the plasma burn-in operation is performed once every 50 wafers processed using above mentioned Endura High Vacuum as the PVD machine.
- FIG. 6 illustrates the statistic graph of the number of particles falling on the wafer sampled every two days when the operation pressure of the plasma burn-in is at 20.0 mtorr and the plasma burn-in operation is performed once every 125 wafers processed using above mentioned Endura High Vacuum as the PVD machine.
- the average number of particles falling on the wafer is 23.333, and in FIG. 6, is 3.526.
- the vacuum chamber 1 typically consists of a process kit 9 provided within the vacuum chamber 1 for preventing the small particles from the nodules and the metal particles from depositing on the lower section of inner wall 15 of the vacuum chamber 1 .
- the process kit 9 shall be replaced by a new one.
- the titanium nitride film on the metal target surface has been removed by argon bombardment due to the plasma burn-in process and it is not desirable.
- argon and nitrogen are supplied into the vacuum chamber 1 and a plasma is produced from argon and nitrogen to nitridize the bombarded surfaces of the titanium target so that a titanium nitride layer is formed on the titanium target.
- the operation pressure of the plasma from argon and nitrogen is between 3.0 mtorr and 4.0 mtorr..
- a protector 11 may be placed on the susceptor 10 to prevent the small particles peeling from the nodules and the metal particles from depositing on the susceptor 10 .
- the protector 11 is typically a control wafer or a shutter.
- a protector 11 is placed on the susceptor 10 to protect the susceptor 10 before the plasma burn-in of the present invention begins.
- the protector 10 is a control wafer or a shutter.
- an inert gas is supplied through the gas inlet 12 into the vacuum chamber 1 .
- a plasma with operation pressure above 10.0 mtorr is produced from the inert gas within the cavity 7 to bombard the nodule 81 and 82 into small particles and to bombard the metal target 4 to produce metal
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Physical Vapour Deposition (AREA)
- Physical Deposition Of Substances That Are Components Of Semiconductor Devices (AREA)
- Electrodes Of Semiconductors (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to a method for maintaining the cleanness within a vacuum chamber of a physical vapor deposition system, especially a method using plasma burn-in for maintaining the cleanness within a vacuum chamber of a physical vapor deposition system.
- Physical vapor deposition method is one of the commonly used methods for depositing metal compound films in semiconductor processes. A metal target is located in a vacuum chamber of the physical vapor deposition system. After supplying a reactive gas and an inert gas into the vacuum chamber and producing a plasma from the reactive gas and the inert gas, the reactive gas derivatives in the plasma react with the metal target, forming metal compound depositing upon a processed wafer.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a vacuum chamber1. Taking the physical vapor deposition of titanium nitride as an example, the
metal target 4 is made of titanium. In typical, aprocess kit 9 is provided in the vacuum chamber 1 to prevent titanium and titanium compound from depositing upon theinner wall 15 of the vacuum chamber 1. During a process, a wafer is placed on thesusceptor 10 and the reactive gas nitrogen and an inert gas (mostly argon) enter the vacuum chamber 1 through agas inlet 12. Thepower supply 14 applies a negative potential on themetal target 4 which is in electrically conductive relationship with anend surface 2 of the vacuum chamber 1. The portions of the vacuum chamber 1 below theinsulating material 13, including theopposite end surface 3, thesusceptor 10, and the processed wafer are all in electrically conductive relationship and are grounded. - By this arrangement, an electric field is formed at the
cavity 7 and a plasma is produced from the nitrogen and the inert gas. The ionized inert gas bombards thesurface 5 of the titanium-made metal target to produce titanium particles. These titanium particles react with nitrogen atoms and nitrogen ions formed in the plasma to produce titanium nitride particles. Some of these titanium nitride particles deposit on the wafer, and some of them deposit on theside surface 6 of the titanium-made metal target and on theinner surface 91 ofprocess kit 9. The particles formed in each process tend to stack on particles already attached to theside surface 6 and theinner surface 91. If the stacking process goes on over the time, nodules such asnodule 81 andnodule 82 will form. Since metal compounds, such as titanium nitride, are brittle in nature andnodules nodules - The conventional plasma burn-in method for a vacuum chamber1 is stated below in this paragraph. After completing a specific number of film deposition processes, an inert gas is supplied into the vacuum chamber 1. Then a plasma is produced from the inert gas to bombard the nodules into small particles and to bombard the
metal target 4 for depositing a ductile metal film upon the brittle metal compound film, thereby maintaining the cleanness within the vacuum chamber 1. - In traditional plasma burn-in method, the operation pressure of the inert gas plasma for plasma burn-in process is identical to the operation pressure, 3.0 to 4.0 mtorr, for metal compound film deposition of the wafer process. Referring now to FIG. 3, the plasma distribution at this operation pressure, however, can not effectively bombard the
nodule 82 on theside surface 6 of the metal target. The peeling of residue ofnodule 82 will still occur and the particle contamination is not substantially improved. It is noted that after the conventional burn-in process, the titanium nitride film on the metal target surface has been removed by argon bombardment due to the plasma burn-in process and it is not desirable. Before performing further wafer processes, argon and nitrogen are supplied into the vacuum chamber 1 and a plasma is produced from argon and nitrogen to nitridize the bombarded surfaces of the titanium target so that a titanium nitride layer is formed on the titanium target. During this operation, the operation pressure of the plasma from argon and nitrogen is between 3.0 mtorr and 4.0 mtorr. - Therefore, a method is desirable for reducing the nodules on the
side surface 6 of the metal target so that the number of particles falling upon the processed wafer is minimized and the yield is increased. - People skilled in this art know that when the pressure in the vacuum chamber is elevated, the ion density of the plasma increases but the ion energy decreases and the mean free path of the particles shortens. On the contrary, when the pressure in the vacuum chamber is lowered, the ion density decreases, and the ion energy and the mean free path of the ion increase. The mean free path represents the mean displacement of a particle before a collision with another particle in a vacuum chamber. It is generally believed that one should lower the pressure in the vacuum chamber to increase the mean free path when expecting a particle to enter a narrower space within the vacuum chamber. In this case, to meet the requirements of high integration density, process microminiaturization, current PVD design mostly aims at higher vacuum and large value of mean free path. By doing this, the etch of sub-micron scale to the wafer can be achieved since the earlier collision of the particles is avoided. In coordination with the utilization of ECR (Electron Cyclotron Resonance), ICP (Inductive Coupled Plasma), TCP (Transformer Coupled Plasma), etc., the ion energy and ion density can be further enhanced. For instance, the TCP9400 series poly etch systems produced by LAM Research Corp. are characterized by their utilization of TCP technology to reach high vacuum and high ion density. Before the emergence of the present invention, the trend of improvement of plasma burn-in operation is to achieve high vacuum and high ion density.
- The present invention provides a plasma burn-in method for maintaining the cleanness within a vacuum chamber of a physical vapor deposition. The present invention produces a plasma with the operation pressure greater than 10.0 mtorr from an inert gas. The plasma distribution at this operation pressure reaches the side surface of the metal target. The plasma bombards the nodules within these sections and bombards the metal target to deposit ductile metal film upon the brittle metal compound film. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the preferable plasma operation pressure is between 15.0 to 30.0 mtorr.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a vacuum chamber;
- FIG. 2 illustrates the relationship between the number of particles falling on the wafer and the plasma operation pressure of the plasma burn-in according to the invention;
- FIG. 3 illustrates the plasma distribution within the vacuum chamber when using a traditional plasma burn-in method;
- FIG. 4 illustrates the plasma distribution within the vacuum chamber when using the plasma burn-in method of the present invention;
- FIG. 5 illustrates the statistic graph of the number of particles falling on the wafer sampled every two days when the operation pressure of the plasma burn-in is at 3.0 mtorr and the plasma burn-in operation is performed once every 50 wafers; and
- FIG. 6 illustrates the statistic graph of the number of particles falling on the wafer sampled every two days when the operation pressure of the plasma burn-in is at 20.0 mtorr and the plasma burn-in operation is performed once every 125 wafers.
- To solve the imperfectness of the traditional plasma burn-in method, the present invention provides a burn-in method using plasma for maintaining the cleanness within the vacuum chamber of the physical vapor deposition system. The physical vapor deposition system is utilized to deposit a metal compound film upon a wafer during wafer processing, and there is a metal target attached on one end surface of the vacuum chamber. The method includes producing a plasma from an inert gas, bombarding a nodule consisting of metal compound particles by the plasma within the vacuum chamber, and bombarding the metal target by the plasma to deposit a metal film upon the metal compound film which is on the inner wall of the vacuum chamber. The invented operation pressure during burn-in operation is selected through the following experiment.
- FIG. 2 illustrates the number of particles falling upon the wafer at distinct operation pressures, in which argon is adopted to produce the plasma and the plasma burn-in cycles remain unchanged. For instance, between two successive burn-in operations, there are either 50 or 125 product wafers completed. The PVD used to obtain FIG. 2 is Endura High Vacuum produced by Applied Materials Corp. The pressure ranges from 3.0 mtorr to about 30.0 mtorr during experiments. We can observe in FIG. 2 that a sharp falling of particle numbers starts around at 10.0 mtorr and the curve gradually goes flat at about 15.0 mtorr. This phenomenon indicates that when the operation pressure of the plasma burn-in operation is elevated above 10.0 mtorr, the number of particles falling upon the wafer declines substantially.
- The present invention discovers through experiment that increasing the operation pressure of the plasma alters the plasma distribution within the vacuum chamber and results in what is shown in FIG. 2 as stated above. Referring now to FIG. 4, which illustrates the plasma distribution within the vacuum chamber when using the plasma burn-in method of the present invention with a plasma operation pressure above 10.0 mtorr. The plasma distribution as shown in FIG. 4 easily bombards the
nodules 82 located in narrow spaces such as theside surface 6 of themetal target 4 into small particles, and bombards the metal target to generate ductile metal particles. The small particles and the ductile metal particles generated are deposited over the inner wall of the vacuum chamber concurrently. This invention greatly decreases the number of particles falling off from the residue ofnodules 82 during wafer production and can minimize the number of occasions of plasma burn-in required. As mentioned in the background section of the specification, it is generally believed that one should lower the operation pressure in the vacuum chamber to increase the mean free path when expecting an ion particle to enter a narrower space within the vacuum chamber. Therefore, the present invention leads to an unexpected result in light of the prior knowledge. - Accordingly, the present invention produces a plasma with operation pressure above 10.0 mtorr from an inert gas within the vacuum chamber1. The plasma bombards the nodules within the vacuum chamber 1 into small particles and bombards the
metal target 4 to generate metal particles so that a ductile metal film is deposited upon the inner surface of the vacuum chamber 1. As themetal target 4 is titanium, the ductile titanium film deposited within the vacuum chamber 1 makes the peeling of titanium nitride film almost impossible. However, in FIG. 2, it is shown the descending curve starts to flatten after 15.0 mtorr and further experiments reveal that when the operation pressure is over 30.0 mtorr, the plasma begins to damage the insulatingmaterial 13. In summary, the preferred plasma operation pressure is between 15.0 and 30.0 mtorr. - FIG. 5 illustrates the statistic graph of the number of particles falling on the wafer sampled every two days when the operation pressure of the plasma burn-in is at 3.0 mtorr and the plasma burn-in operation is performed once every 50 wafers processed using above mentioned Endura High Vacuum as the PVD machine. FIG. 6 illustrates the statistic graph of the number of particles falling on the wafer sampled every two days when the operation pressure of the plasma burn-in is at 20.0 mtorr and the plasma burn-in operation is performed once every 125 wafers processed using above mentioned Endura High Vacuum as the PVD machine. In FIG. 5, the average number of particles falling on the wafer is 23.333, and in FIG. 6, is 3.526. It is observed that even when the period between two successive plasma burn-in operations becomes longer (from once every 50 wafers to once every 125 wafers), the average number of particles falling on the wafer merely reaches one sixth of that in FIG. 5 or even less, as shown in FIG. 6. Based on this observation, it is concluded that by increasing the operation pressure of plasma burn-in operation to the preferred range of the present invention, the number of particles falling on the wafer indeed is reduced and the period between two successive plasma burn-in operations can be extended.
- In addition, the vacuum chamber1 typically consists of a
process kit 9 provided within the vacuum chamber 1 for preventing the small particles from the nodules and the metal particles from depositing on the lower section ofinner wall 15 of the vacuum chamber 1. When the metal film or the metal compound film, such as titanium nitride film, accumulates over theinner surface 91 to some extent, theprocess kit 9 shall be replaced by a new one. - Same as the conventional approach, after the burn-in process of the invention, the titanium nitride film on the metal target surface has been removed by argon bombardment due to the plasma burn-in process and it is not desirable. Before performing further wafer processes, argon and nitrogen are supplied into the vacuum chamber1 and a plasma is produced from argon and nitrogen to nitridize the bombarded surfaces of the titanium target so that a titanium nitride layer is formed on the titanium target. During this operation, the operation pressure of the plasma from argon and nitrogen is between 3.0 mtorr and 4.0 mtorr..
- Besides, prior to plasma burn-in operation, the wafer has to be removed. Referring to FIG. 1, a
protector 11 may be placed on thesusceptor 10 to prevent the small particles peeling from the nodules and the metal particles from depositing on thesusceptor 10. In practice, theprotector 11 is typically a control wafer or a shutter. - In summary, a
protector 11 is placed on thesusceptor 10 to protect thesusceptor 10 before the plasma burn-in of the present invention begins. In practice, theprotector 10 is a control wafer or a shutter. Then an inert gas is supplied through thegas inlet 12 into the vacuum chamber 1. A plasma with operation pressure above 10.0 mtorr is produced from the inert gas within thecavity 7 to bombard thenodule metal target 4 to produce metal
Claims (21)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
TW089119527A TW512180B (en) | 2000-09-21 | 2000-09-21 | Method for maintaining the cleanness of a vacuum chamber of physical vapor deposition system |
TW089119527 | 2000-09-21 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20020033329A1 true US20020033329A1 (en) | 2002-03-21 |
US6413384B1 US6413384B1 (en) | 2002-07-02 |
Family
ID=21661265
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/725,219 Expired - Lifetime US6413384B1 (en) | 2000-09-21 | 2000-11-29 | Method for maintaining the cleanness of a vacuum chamber of a physical vapor deposition system |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6413384B1 (en) |
TW (1) | TW512180B (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090272647A1 (en) * | 2008-05-02 | 2009-11-05 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Process kit for rf physical vapor deposition |
CN113832439A (en) * | 2021-08-24 | 2021-12-24 | 华能新能源股份有限公司 | Film preparation method and equipment |
CN117987775A (en) * | 2024-04-03 | 2024-05-07 | 粤芯半导体技术股份有限公司 | Physical vapor deposition method and device for metal nitride film |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP4923450B2 (en) * | 2005-07-01 | 2012-04-25 | 富士ゼロックス株式会社 | Batch processing support apparatus and method, program |
US20070021935A1 (en) * | 2005-07-12 | 2007-01-25 | Larson Dean J | Methods for verifying gas flow rates from a gas supply system into a plasma processing chamber |
US20070012663A1 (en) * | 2005-07-13 | 2007-01-18 | Akihiro Hosokawa | Magnetron sputtering system for large-area substrates having removable anodes |
US20070012558A1 (en) * | 2005-07-13 | 2007-01-18 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Magnetron sputtering system for large-area substrates |
US20070084720A1 (en) * | 2005-07-13 | 2007-04-19 | Akihiro Hosokawa | Magnetron sputtering system for large-area substrates having removable anodes |
US20070012559A1 (en) * | 2005-07-13 | 2007-01-18 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method of improving magnetron sputtering of large-area substrates using a removable anode |
US20070051616A1 (en) * | 2005-09-07 | 2007-03-08 | Le Hienminh H | Multizone magnetron assembly |
US20070056843A1 (en) * | 2005-09-13 | 2007-03-15 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method of processing a substrate using a large-area magnetron sputtering chamber with individually controlled sputtering zones |
US7588668B2 (en) | 2005-09-13 | 2009-09-15 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Thermally conductive dielectric bonding of sputtering targets using diamond powder filler or thermally conductive ceramic fillers |
US20070056850A1 (en) * | 2005-09-13 | 2007-03-15 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Large-area magnetron sputtering chamber with individually controlled sputtering zones |
CN100425729C (en) * | 2006-05-10 | 2008-10-15 | 友达光电股份有限公司 | Method for cleaning sputter |
Family Cites Families (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AU8629491A (en) * | 1990-08-30 | 1992-03-30 | Materials Research Corporation | Pretextured cathode sputtering target and method of preparation thereof and sputtering therewith |
US5380414A (en) * | 1993-06-11 | 1995-01-10 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Shield and collimator pasting deposition chamber with a wafer support periodically used as an acceptor |
US5914018A (en) * | 1996-08-23 | 1999-06-22 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Sputter target for eliminating redeposition on the target sidewall |
US6187151B1 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2001-02-13 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Method of in-situ cleaning and deposition of device structures in a high density plasma environment |
US5876574A (en) * | 1997-04-23 | 1999-03-02 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Magnet design for a sputtering chamber |
US6030514A (en) * | 1997-05-02 | 2000-02-29 | Sony Corporation | Method of reducing sputtering burn-in time, minimizing sputtered particulate, and target assembly therefor |
US5976327A (en) * | 1997-12-12 | 1999-11-02 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Step coverage and overhang improvement by pedestal bias voltage modulation |
US6051113A (en) * | 1998-04-27 | 2000-04-18 | Cvc Products, Inc. | Apparatus and method for multi-target physical-vapor deposition of a multi-layer material structure using target indexing |
US6132805A (en) * | 1998-10-20 | 2000-10-17 | Cvc Products, Inc. | Shutter for thin-film processing equipment |
US6156164A (en) * | 1999-06-22 | 2000-12-05 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Virtual shutter method and apparatus for preventing damage to gallium arsenide substrates during processing |
US6207558B1 (en) * | 1999-10-21 | 2001-03-27 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Barrier applications for aluminum planarization |
US6228236B1 (en) * | 1999-10-22 | 2001-05-08 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Sputter magnetron having two rotation diameters |
-
2000
- 2000-09-21 TW TW089119527A patent/TW512180B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2000-11-29 US US09/725,219 patent/US6413384B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090272647A1 (en) * | 2008-05-02 | 2009-11-05 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Process kit for rf physical vapor deposition |
WO2009135050A3 (en) * | 2008-05-02 | 2010-02-18 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Process kit for rf physical vapor deposition |
US8668815B2 (en) | 2008-05-02 | 2014-03-11 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Process kit for RF physical vapor deposition |
US9123511B2 (en) | 2008-05-02 | 2015-09-01 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Process kit for RF physical vapor deposition |
CN113832439A (en) * | 2021-08-24 | 2021-12-24 | 华能新能源股份有限公司 | Film preparation method and equipment |
CN117987775A (en) * | 2024-04-03 | 2024-05-07 | 粤芯半导体技术股份有限公司 | Physical vapor deposition method and device for metal nitride film |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6413384B1 (en) | 2002-07-02 |
TW512180B (en) | 2002-12-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6709553B2 (en) | Multiple-step sputter deposition | |
JP4429605B2 (en) | Ionized PVD method and apparatus with sequential deposition and etching | |
JP4892227B2 (en) | Improved magnetron sputtering system for large area substrates. | |
US6413384B1 (en) | Method for maintaining the cleanness of a vacuum chamber of a physical vapor deposition system | |
EP0859070B1 (en) | Coating of inside of vacuum chambers | |
EP0983394B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for low pressure sputtering | |
US6132564A (en) | In-situ pre-metallization clean and metallization of semiconductor wafers | |
US6673716B1 (en) | Control of the deposition temperature to reduce the via and contact resistance of Ti and TiN deposited using ionized PVD techniques | |
US6652718B1 (en) | Use of RF biased ESC to influence the film properties of Ti and TiN | |
CN112376024B (en) | Preparation method of oxide film | |
JP2004526868A5 (en) | ||
JPH04198476A (en) | plasma processing equipment | |
US5346585A (en) | Use of a faceted etch process to eliminate stringers | |
EP0779651A2 (en) | Method and apparatus for plasma processing | |
KR20010051386A (en) | A method for depositing one or more layers on a substrate | |
TW202016333A (en) | High power impulse magnetron sputtering physical vapor deposition of tungsten films having improved bottom coverage | |
EP1101834A2 (en) | Method of depositing materials on substrates | |
US6258219B1 (en) | Two-step deposition process for preventing arcs | |
US20040140196A1 (en) | Shaping features in sputter deposition | |
EP0818556A1 (en) | A method for providing full-face high density plasma deposition | |
TW202436650A (en) | Apparatus and methods for depositing material within a through via | |
US6374833B1 (en) | Method of in situ reactive gas plasma treatment | |
US5792324A (en) | Method and apparatus of forming a thin film | |
CN102732889B (en) | Method and apparatus for removing metal on wafer clamp | |
EP4207245A1 (en) | Method of operating a pvd apparatus |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PROMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC., TAIWAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:WU, HSIAO-CHE;REEL/FRAME:011297/0072 Effective date: 20001024 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
SULP | Surcharge for late payment |
Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |