Khalaquzzaman et al., 2014 - Google Patents
Estimation of reactor protection system software failure probability considering undetected faultsKhalaquzzaman et al., 2014
- Document ID
- 16357822791598879082
- Author
- Khalaquzzaman M
- Lee S
- Kim M
- Jung W
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Nuclear Engineering and Design
External Links
Snippet
Over the years, the probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) of digital reactor protection systems (RPSs) has been a field of research because of the ambiguity over the mechanism of the software failure and quantification of the failure probability. Currently, the software …
- 238000004458 analytical method 0 abstract description 17
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/07—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring responding to the occurence of a fault, e.g. fault tolerance
- G06F11/0703—Error or fault processing not based on redundancy, i.e. by taking additional measures to deal with the error or fault not making use of redundancy in operation, in hardware, or in data representation
- G06F11/0706—Error or fault processing not based on redundancy, i.e. by taking additional measures to deal with the error or fault not making use of redundancy in operation, in hardware, or in data representation the processing taking place on a specific hardware platform or in a specific software environment
- G06F11/0721—Error or fault processing not based on redundancy, i.e. by taking additional measures to deal with the error or fault not making use of redundancy in operation, in hardware, or in data representation the processing taking place on a specific hardware platform or in a specific software environment within a central processing unit [CPU]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/22—Detection or location of defective computer hardware by testing during standby operation or during idle time, e.g. start-up testing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit using stored programme, i.e. using internal store of processing equipment to receive and retain programme
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0218—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2201/00—Indexing scheme relating to error detection, to error correction, and to monitoring
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Maurya et al. | Reliability of safety‐critical systems: A state‐of‐the‐art review | |
| Bao et al. | Hazard analysis for identifying common cause failures of digital safety systems using a redundancy-guided systems-theoretic approach | |
| Kang et al. | Development of a Bayesian belief network model for software reliability quantification of digital protection systems in nuclear power plants | |
| Lee et al. | Development of simulation-based testing environment for safety-critical software | |
| Cai et al. | Quantitative software reliability assessment methodology based on Bayesian belief networks and statistical testing for safety-critical software | |
| Bao et al. | Quantitative Risk Analysis of High Safety Significant Safety-related Digital Instrumentation and Control Systems in Nuclear Power Plants using IRADIC Technology | |
| Dahll | Combining disparate sources of information in the safety assessment of software-based systems | |
| Fahmy | Development of dynamic fault tree model for reactor protection system | |
| Khalaquzzaman et al. | Estimation of reactor protection system software failure probability considering undetected faults | |
| Lee et al. | PSA model with consideration of the effect of fault-tolerant techniques in digital I&C systems | |
| Kang et al. | An overview of risk quantification issues for digitalized nuclear power plants using a static fault tree | |
| Kang et al. | Input-profile-based software failure probability quantification for safety signal generation systems | |
| Singh et al. | Impact analysis of change in component reliabilities in safety‐critical systems | |
| Babu et al. | A hybrid approach to quantify software reliability in nuclear safety systems | |
| Authén et al. | Guidelines for reliability analysis of digital systems in PSA context–Final Report | |
| Knochenhauer et al. | Using Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) modelling for rapid source term prediction. Final report | |
| Kang et al. | Application of condition-based HRA method for a manual actuation of the safety features in a nuclear power plant | |
| Kim et al. | Input-domain software testing for failure probability estimation of safety-critical applications in consideration of past input sequence | |
| Seo et al. | Experimental approach to evaluate software reliability in hardware-software integrated environment | |
| Bläsius et al. | Quality Management, Verification, and Validation of Structure Mechanical Computer Codes at GRS | |
| Kim et al. | Reliability modeling of digital component in plant protection system with various fault-tolerant techniques | |
| Diaconeasa et al. | Discrete dynamic event tree uncertainty quantification in the ADS-IDAC dynamic PSA software platform | |
| Haridasan et al. | Safety analysis of 2oo4 coincidence logic systems | |
| Haruhara et al. | Proposal of quantification method of dynamic system reliability model of digital RPS using Markov state-transition model | |
| Jung | Improved design architecture to minimize functional complexity of plant protection system for nuclear power plant |