Men et al., 2021 - Google Patents
Subjective image quality assessment with boosted triplet comparisonsMen et al., 2021
View PDF- Document ID
- 14018822083926021126
- Author
- Men H
- Lin H
- Jenadeleh M
- Saupe D
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- IEEE Access
External Links
Snippet
In subjective full-reference image quality assessment, a reference image is distorted at increasing distortion levels. The differences between perceptual image qualities of the reference image and its distorted versions are evaluated, often using degradation category …
- 238000001303 quality assessment method 0 title abstract description 32
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
- G06Q30/0202—Market predictions or demand forecasting
- G06Q30/0203—Market surveys or market polls
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
- G06T2207/30168—Image quality inspection
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/20—Special algorithmic details
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T5/00—Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit-mapped to bit-mapped creating a similar image
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N17/00—Diagnosis, testing or measuring for television systems or their details
- H04N17/004—Diagnosis, testing or measuring for television systems or their details for digital television systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/10—Image acquisition modality
- G06T2207/10024—Color image
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T11/00—2D [Two Dimensional] image generation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Men et al. | Subjective image quality assessment with boosted triplet comparisons | |
| Kundu et al. | Large-scale crowdsourced study for tone-mapped HDR pictures | |
| Mantiuk et al. | Comparison of four subjective methods for image quality assessment | |
| Fezza et al. | Perceptual evaluation of adversarial attacks for CNN-based image classification | |
| Ferzli et al. | A no-reference objective image sharpness metric based on the notion of just noticeable blur (JNB) | |
| Liu et al. | Image retargeting quality assessment | |
| Ribeiro et al. | Crowdsourcing subjective image quality evaluation | |
| Narvekar et al. | A no-reference image blur metric based on the cumulative probability of blur detection (CPBD) | |
| Ma et al. | Image retargeting quality assessment: A study of subjective scores and objective metrics | |
| Zerman et al. | An extensive performance evaluation of full-reference HDR image quality metrics | |
| Xiang et al. | Blind night-time image quality assessment: Subjective and objective approaches | |
| Lin et al. | Large-scale crowdsourced subjective assessment of picturewise just noticeable difference | |
| Tourancheau et al. | Impact of subjective dataset on the performance of image quality metrics | |
| Yang et al. | Modeling the screen content image quality via multiscale edge attention similarity | |
| Bong et al. | Blind image blur assessment by using valid reblur range and histogram shape difference | |
| Krasula et al. | Preference of experience in image tone-mapping: Dataset and framework for objective measures comparison | |
| Menkovski et al. | Adaptive psychometric scaling for video quality assessment | |
| Li et al. | AccAnn: A new subjective assessment methodology for measuring acceptability and annoyance of quality of experience | |
| Chen et al. | QoE evaluation for live broadcasting video | |
| Siahaan et al. | Beauty is in the scale of the beholder: Comparison of methodologies for the subjective assessment of image aesthetic appeal | |
| Cheon et al. | Ambiguity of objective image quality metrics: A new methodology for performance evaluation | |
| Beghdadi et al. | Ceed-a database for image contrast enhancement evaluation | |
| Farias et al. | Perceptual contributions of blocky, blurry, noisy, and ringing synthetic artifacts to overall annoyance | |
| Gracheva et al. | Subjective assessment of the quality of static and video images from mobile phones | |
| Wang et al. | A user model for JND-based video quality assessment: theory and applications |