+
X
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
  3. Article

Multi-adjoint based group decision-making under an intuitionistic fuzzy information system

  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 12 November 2018
  • Volume 12, pages 172–182, (2018)
  • Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Download PDF
International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Multi-adjoint based group decision-making under an intuitionistic fuzzy information system
Download PDF
  • Meishe Liang1,2,
  • Jusheng Mi1,
  • Tao Feng3 &
  • …
  • Bin Xie4 
  • 80 Accesses

  • 10 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

The construction of belief intervals is crucial for decision-making in multi-attribute group information integration. Based on multi-adjoint and evidence theory, an approach to multi-criteria group decision-making(MCGDM) in intuitionistic fuzzy information system is proposed. First, the upper and lower approximations of alternatives are calculated by multi-adjoint operators under the correlation matrices which were given by different experts. After that the belief and plausibility functions are gained by intuitionistic fuzzy probability formulas. Second, the belief intervals of alternatives are acquired by combining all experts’ evidence. Then the alternatives are ranked by comparing the belief intervals. Finally, the effectiveness of the method is verified by an application of business transaction. Compared with the existing model, the method introduced in this paper is more effective and accurate.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

An intuitionistic linguistic MCDM model based on probabilistic exceedance method and evidence theory

Article 21 February 2020

Multi-criteria decision-making method with double risk parameters in interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environments

Article Open access 19 June 2020

Utilization of trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and extended fuzzy preference relation for multi-criteria group decision-making based on individual differentiation of decision-makers

Article 27 March 2019

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Logical Analysis
  • Formal Logic
  • General Logic
  • Knowledge Based Systems
  • Logic
  • Operations Research and Decision Theory
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. F. Meng and Q. An, A new approach for group decision making method with hesitant fuzzy preference relation. Knowl.-Based Syst., 172 (2017) 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Z. Zhang, Heisitant fuzzy multi criteria group decision making with unknown weight information. Int. J. Inf. Tech. Dec. Mak., 19 (3) (2017) 615–636.

  3. L. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control., 8 (3) (1965) 338–353.

  4. K. T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst., 20 (1) (1986) 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Chen and J. Tan, Handling multi-criteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 67 (2) (1994) 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Hong and C. Choi, Multi-criteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst., 114 (1) (2000) 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. T. Atanassov, G. Pasi, R. R. Yager, Intuitionistic fuzzy interpretations of multi criteria multi person and multi measurement tool decision making. Int. J. Syst. Sci., 36 (14) (2005) 859–868.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Büyüközkan and S. Güleryz, Multi Criteria Group Decision Making Approach for Smart Phone Selection Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., 9 (4) (2016) 709–725.

  9. H. Liao, Z. Li, X. Zeng, et al. A Comparison of Distinct Consensus Measures for Group Decision Making with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relations. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., 10 (1) (2017) 456–469.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Lu, G. Zhang, D. Ruan, Intelligent multi-criteria fuzzy group decision-making for situation assessments. Soft Comput., 12 (3) (2008) 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. R. Yager Multicriteria decision making with ordinal/linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy sets for mobile apps. IEEE. Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 24 (3) (2016) 590–599.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. R. Yager, The power average operator. IEEE. Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern., 31 (6) (2001) 724–731.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. Zhou, H. Chen, J. Liu, Generalized power aggregation operators and their applications in group decision making. Comput. Ind. Eng., 62 (4) (2012) 989–999.

  14. L. Zhou and H. Chen, A generalization of the power aggregation operators for linguistic environment and its application in group decision making. Knowl.-Based Syst., 26 (2012) 216–224.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Xu and H. Wang Approaches based on 2-tuple linguistic power aggregation operators for multiple attribute group decision making under linguistic environment. Appl. Soft Comput., 11 (5) (2011) 3988–3997.

  16. Y. Li, Y. Wang, P. Liu, Multiple attribute group decision-making methods based on trapezoidal fuzzy two-dimension linguistic power generalized aggregation operators. Soft Comput., 20 (7) (2016) 2689–2704.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Liu and F. Teng, Multiple attribute decision making method based on normal neutrosophic generalized weighted power averaging operator. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern., 9 (2) (2015) 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Z. Xu and X. Cai, Nonlinear optimation models for multiple attribute group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy information. Int. J. Intell. Syst., 25 (2010) 489–513.

  19. S. Wan, Determination of experts’ weights based on vague set for multi-sttribute group decision-making. Commum. Appl. Math. Comput., 24 (1) (2010) 45–52.

  20. X. Liang and C. Wei, An Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making method based on entropy and similarity measure. Int. J. Mach. learn. Cybern., 5 (3) (2014) 435–444.

  21. Z. Ren and C. Wei, A multi-attribute decision-making method with prioritization relationship and dual hesitant fuzzy decision information. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern., 8 (2017) 755–763.

    Google Scholar 

  22. L. Jin, X. Fang, Y. Xu, A Method for Multi-attribute Decision Making Under Uncertainty Using Evidential Reasoning and Prospect Theory. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., 8(sup1) (2015) 48–62.

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. Zhu and J. Zhan, Fuzzy parameterized fuzzy soft sets and decision making. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern., 7 (2016) 1207–1212.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Z. Zhang, C. Guo, Fusion of Heterogeneous Incomplete Hesitant Preference Relations in Group Decision Making. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., 9 (2) (2016) 245–262.

  25. A. Khalid and I. Beg, Incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., 19 (3) (2017) 1–9.

  26. P. Liu and S. Chen Multiattribute group decision making based on intuitionistic 2-tuple linguistic information. Inf. Sci., 430–431 (2018) 599–619.

  27. H. Zhao, W. Ma, B. Sun, A novel decision making approach based on intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern., 8(4) (2015) 1107ł1117.

  28. W. Wu and L. Zhou, Topological structures of intuitionistic fuzzy rough sets. in Proc. 7rd Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 2008, pp. 618–623.

    Google Scholar 

  29. G. Shafer, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  30. C. Eugenia, J. Medina, E. A. Ramirez, Comparative study of adjoint triples. Fuzzy Sets Syst., 211 (1) (2013) 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  31. T. Feng, S. Zhang, J. Mi, Belief functions on general intuitionistic fuzzy information systems. Inf. Sci., 271 (7) (2014) 143–158.

    Google Scholar 

  32. G. Zhang and J. Lu, A linguistic intelligent user guide for method selection in multi-objective decision support systems. Inf. Sci., 179 (14) (2009) 2299–2308.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Mathematics and Information Science, Hebei Normal University, 050024, Shijiazhuang, P.R. China

    Meishe Liang & Jusheng Mi

  2. Department of Scientific Development and School-Business Cooperation, Shijiazhuang University of Applied Technology, 050081, Shijiazhuang, P.R. China

    Meishe Liang

  3. College of Science, Hebei University of Science and Technology, 050018, Shijiazhuang, P.R. China

    Tao Feng

  4. Information and Technology College, Hebei Normal University, 050024, Shijiazhuang, P.R. China

    Bin Xie

Authors
  1. Meishe Liang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jusheng Mi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tao Feng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bin Xie
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meishe Liang.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, M., Mi, J., Feng, T. et al. Multi-adjoint based group decision-making under an intuitionistic fuzzy information system. Int J Comput Intell Syst 12, 172–182 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.12.1.172

Download citation

  • Received: 10 July 2018

  • Accepted: 28 October 2018

  • Published: 12 November 2018

  • Version of record: 12 November 2018

  • Issue date: January 2018

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.12.1.172

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Multi-criteria Group Decision Making
  • Group Decision Making
  • Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
  • Evidence Theory;
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载