This is more of a formatting change request than an issue. I wanted to use some information in the Analysis tab, but this information is presented differently from the other tabs. That made selecting/filtering for what I wanted more involved, because I kept losing samples and had to figure out why.

Instead of having each entry in Analysis as a column, it's all as rows under 2 columns (analysis.Title, analysis.Result). Is it necessary that the information is presented this way instead of making each entry an individual column?

The way it is currently means that if a sequenced library isn't run through this analysis, it won't have an entry, not even an place-holder NA, so when I filtered for "Initial reads", a bunch of samples I wanted to include were lost from my table (yes, these were blanks. Absolutely I still need them).

I did realize the entries under analysis.Title are not consistent, which is coming from Pandora itself, which is a problem. For example, GRG003.B0101.SG1.1.Human_Shotgun has:

Initial reads (forward+reverse): 
Failed reads (fwd+rev): 
Failed reads (fwd+rev) in %: 
Merged reads: Merged reads in %: 
Mapped reads (fwd+rev+merged): 
Mapped reads (fwd+rev+merged) in %: 
Mapped fragments: 
Mapped fragments in %: 
Mapped fragments (L>=30): 
Mapped fragments (L>=30) in %:

while GRG004.A0101.SG1.1.Human_Shotgun has:

Initial reads: 
Failed reads: 
Failed reads in %: 
Mapped reads/fragments: 
Mapped reads/fragments in %: 
Mapped reads/fragments (L>=30): 
Mapped reads/fragments (L>=30) in %:

Is that difference b/c the human shotgun screening pipeline changed? Can it be normalized across Pandora, so that you can make the entries columns like for the other tabs?