Copies as alternative to Symlinks #350
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for the suggestion! Would you consider making this a fallback for |
|
Thank you for checking. Actually not as an automatic fallback or so, but as another option. In our Team we've been using copies for a while. Apart from the windows reason, there was also the requirement to have all the certification critical code in one repo. Thanks to the copies we could still have the generic code in an external repo, making it easier to be used in others. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Symlinking is a great option, especially on Linux. However, on Windows, creating symlinks often requires administrative privileges. To address this, this PR introduces a
copiesoption as an alternative. While less performant, it provides a reliable solution. Some users may even prefer this approach, as copied dependencies can be versioned, making it easier to review PRs that include library changes.