+
Skip to content

Update int_github__issue_joined.sql #31

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 10, 2022

Conversation

jackiexsun
Copy link
Contributor

@jackiexsun jackiexsun commented Mar 10, 2022

Pull Request
Are you a current Fivetran customer?
I work at Fivetran :)

What change(s) does this PR introduce?
Fixes this #30

Did you update the CHANGELOG?

  • Yes

How do I do that?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes (please provide breaking change details below.)
  • No (please provide an explanation as to how the change is non-breaking below.)

Did you update the dbt_project.yml files with the version upgrade (please leverage standard semantic versioning)? (In both your main project and integration_tests)

  • Yes

How do I do that?
Is this PR in response to a previously created Bug or Feature Request

How did you test the PR changes?

  • CircleCi
  • Local (please provide additional testing details below)

First i ran dbt run -m +int_github__issue_joined and then I ran dbt run -m github__issues and I examined the output.

Select which warehouse(s) were used to test the PR

  • BigQuery
  • Redshift
  • Snowflake
  • Postgres
  • Databricks
  • Other (provide details below)

Provide an emoji that best describes your current mood

🌮

Feedback

We are so excited you decided to contribute to the Fivetran community dbt package! We continue to work to improve the packages and would greatly appreciate your feedback on our existing dbt packages or what you'd like to see next.

Copy link
Contributor

@fivetran-joemarkiewicz fivetran-joemarkiewicz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks so much for opening this PR @jackiexsun! 💯 I am so happy you are contributing to our packages!

I just tested your proposed changes locally and was having trouble with the query compiling properly. I added a suggestion in line that you can try on your end. It worked for the sample set I just used.

If you want to test these changes yourself, you can actually install your forked branch in place of the dbt hub package version! You can do that by removing the fivetran/github package dependency in the packages.yml file and using the below instead:

packages:
    - git: https://github.com/jackiexsun/dbt_github.git
      revision: patch-1
      warn-unpinned: false

This will allow you to install your forked version on dbt deps and run your code in place of the package code. Feel free to test this out and apply the suggestion I made. Let me know if you have any questions!

Also, FYI since we are using dbt v0.20.2 internally we will use a similar git branch dependency style if you want to integrate these changes ASAP since the latest version of the package only supports dbt >= v1.0.0

@jackiexsun
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fivetran-joemarkiewicz thanks for the review! i converted it to your suggestion and ran the model locally, and it compiled and produced the right url links.

Copy link
Contributor

@fivetran-joemarkiewicz fivetran-joemarkiewicz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks again so much @jackiexsun for this contribution! The changes look great to me.

Also, I added a few updates to include the version update and also some CHANGELOG additions. All looks good to merge to me!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载