+
Skip to content

Api management stakeholder requirements #874

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Api management stakeholder requirements #874

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

wmader23
Copy link
Contributor

@wmader23 wmader23 commented Apr 8, 2025 •
edited
Loading

This pull request introduces Stakeholder Requirements for a proposed way how to document and governs APIs in S-CORE. In addition a process is described implementing the requirements.

Ref: closes #876

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 8, 2025 •
edited
Loading

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run //:license-check

Status: ✅ Passed

Click to expand output 
[License Check Output]
2025/04/10 14:09:11 Downloading https://releases.bazel.build/7.4.0/release/bazel-7.4.0-linux-x86_64...
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server and connecting to it...
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Analyzing: target //:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Analyzing: target //:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (67 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (90 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (96 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (99 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (131 packages loaded, 1329 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (133 packages loaded, 1617 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (145 packages loaded, 2465 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (145 packages loaded, 2465 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (146 packages loaded, 2588 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (149 packages loaded, 4611 targets configured)

INFO: Analyzed target //:license-check (150 packages loaded, 4737 targets configured).
[11 / 13] [Prepa] JavaToolchainCompileBootClasspath external/rules_java~/toolchains/platformclasspath.jar
[12 / 13] Building license.check.license_check.jar (); 0s multiplex-worker
INFO: Found 1 target...
Target //:license.check.license_check up-to-date:
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check.jar
INFO: Elapsed time: 23.237s, Critical Path: 2.50s
INFO: 13 processes: 9 internal, 3 processwrapper-sandbox, 1 worker.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 13 total actions
INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/license.check.license_check ./formatted.txt -review -project automotive.score -repo https://github.com/eclipse-score/score -token otyhZ4eaRYK1tKLNNF-Y
[main] INFO Querying Eclipse Foundation for license data for 76 items.
[main] INFO Found 52 items.
[main] INFO Querying ClearlyDefined for license data for 24 items.
[main] INFO Found 24 items.
[main] INFO Vetted license information was found for all content. No further investigation is required.

masc2023
masc2023 requested changes Apr 8, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@masc2023 masc2023 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please check here for contributing new features,
https://eclipse-score.github.io/score/main/platform_management_plan/change_management.html

Adding stakeholder requirements requires Feature Request, Issue First, process areas have intention to be tool independent, these contributions are either part of our PMP
https://eclipse-score.github.io/score/main/platform_management_plan/software_development.html

, or contributions
https://eclipse-score.github.io/score/main/contribute/development/index.html

@wmader23 wmader23 marked this pull request as draft April 9, 2025 12:47
@masc2023 masc2023 mentioned this pull request Apr 10, 2025
Open
@wmader23 wmader23 force-pushed the api_management_feature_request branch from 48ff17e to d135fce Compare April 10, 2025 14:08
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

@wmader23
Copy link
Contributor Author

wmader23 commented Apr 10, 2025 •
edited
Loading

In response to #874 (review) I

  • created and linked an issue which follows the template for a Feature Modification Request
  • reduced the PR to only contain tooling-agnostic stakeholder requirements.

In case the requirements are accepted, I will provide the process documentation, further requirements, etc. in a separate PR.

@wmader23 wmader23 changed the title Api management process description and stakeholder requirements Api management stakeholder requirements Apr 10, 2025
@AlexanderLanin AlexanderLanin mentioned this pull request May 28, 2025
Merged
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. It will be closed in 10 days if no further activity occurs. #magic___^_^___line

@nicu1989 nicu1989 closed this Jun 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@masc2023 masc2023 masc2023 requested changes

@antonkri antonkri Awaiting requested review from antonkri antonkri will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review antonkri is a code owner

@FScholPer FScholPer Awaiting requested review from FScholPer FScholPer will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review FScholPer is a code owner

@qor-lb qor-lb Awaiting requested review from qor-lb qor-lb will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review qor-lb is a code owner

@johannes-esr johannes-esr Awaiting requested review from johannes-esr johannes-esr will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review johannes-esr is a code owner

Assignees

@antonkri antonkri

@FScholPer FScholPer

@qor-lb qor-lb

@johannes-esr johannes-esr

@markert-r markert-r

Labels

committee:technical_lead_circle

Projects

Feature Requests / Modification
Status: No status

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Establish API documentation and live-cycle management: Additions to Stakeholder Requirements

8 participants

@wmader23 @masc2023 @nicu1989 @antonkri @FScholPer @qor-lb @johannes-esr @markert-r
点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务，不要输入任何密码和下载