Replies: 1 comment
-
my understanding is this was inherited from docker, which is codified in the OCI spec. there's a lot of background and history here, but my understanding is last we talked about it containerd was going to add support for CAP_ prefix. i don't believe CRI-O is in the wrong here. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
We received manifests from another team running CRI-O in their cluster, while we are using containerd. When we deployed their manifests, all hell broke loose.
We discovered that the team using CRI-O had under securityContext specified capabilities with the CAP_ prefix, which does not work in containerd.
According to the Kubernetes documentation:
Source: Kubernetes Documentation
So, what is up with this? Why does CRI-O allow the CAP_ prefix for capabilities, while containerd does not?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions