Il-to-IL pass: Infer sideconditions #9
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
f52985
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 21, 2023
This transformation will 1) make the equality conditions explicit as assignment conditions, if they are indeed assignments, and 2) reorder the premises that resembles the actual order of execution in interpreter Depends upon #9.
Closed
Alan-Liang
pushed a commit
to Alan-Liang/spectec
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2024
Merge with upstream
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This transformation make explicit the following implicit side conditions
of terms in premises and conclusions:
Depends upon
#6and #5.