+
Skip to content

Fun Fact Voids™ - do these still exist in R8? #93

@johyphenel

Description

@johyphenel

IMO the changes from #10 do not make it any more clear what someone should do to print these correctly.

  1. It would be great to have screenshots from a slicer (doesn't matter which) of what the voids should look like when sliced correctly.
  2. Fun Fact Voids™ #10 references tweaking "gap closing radius" or similar in slicers to make these voids show — the manual should include this along with a suggested value.
  3. It's not clear to me that this advice actually works..? (see below)

The manual shows the Tap_Front part when giving the fun fact — so I'm trying with Tap_Front_r8.stl. In Orca slicer, setting Slice gap closing radius to 0.0, 0.02, or 0.049 (my profile default) seems to make no difference (and I don't think I see the voids?).

Image

Using Ellis' preferred version of SuperSlicer & his current configs on github gives similar results:

Image

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

      点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载