- Review
- Open access
- Published:
Zika virus tropism and pathogenesis: understanding clinical impacts and transmission dynamics
Virology Journal volume 21, Article number: 271 (2024)
Abstract
The Zika virus (ZIKV) is classified within the Flavivirus genus of the Flaviviridae family and is categorized as an arbovirus. The virus was initially identified in a rhesus monkey in Uganda in 1947 and later in a human in Nigeria in 1952. Since 2007, the prevalence of the virus has been on the rise, culminating in a major outbreak in the United States (US) in 2015. During this outbreak, the adult population was severely impacted, experiencing a range of symptoms, including organ failure, microcephaly, fetal death, and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Additionally, skin rash, limb swelling, fever, headache, and heightened sensitivity are found in most adults with Zika syndrome. Although the virus can be transmitted through blood, vertical transmission from mother to child, and sexual contact, the primary way of transmission of the virus is through the Aedes mosquito. Cells such as neurons, macrophages, peripheral dendritic cells, and placental cells are among the target cells that the virus can infect. The TAM AXL receptor plays a crucial role in infection. After the virus enters the body through the bloodstream, it spreads in the body with a latent period of 3 to 12 days. Currently, there is no specific treatment or publicly available vaccine for the ZIKV. Limited laboratory testing has been conducted, and existing drugs originally designed for other pathogens have been repurposed for treatment. Given the Aedes mosquito's role as a vector and the wide geographical impact of the virus, this study aims to comprehensively investigate Zika's pathogenesis and clinical symptoms based on existing knowledge and research. By doing so, we seek to enhance our understanding of the virus and inform future prevention and treatment strategies.
Introduction
The Zika virus (ZIKV) is a member of the Flaviviridae family and falls under the Flavivirus genus. Within this genus, other viruses like yellow fever (YFV), tick-borne encephalitis (TBEV), dengue hemorrhagic fever (DENV), and West Nile fever (WNV) viruses are also included [1]. This virus is one of the arboviruses and is transmitted by mosquitoes [2]. Structurally, it is an 11 kilobases (kb) long positive-sense single-stranded RNA virus. The genome of this virus initially encodes a polyprotein, which is finally converted into three structural proteins and seven non-structural proteins by viral and cellular proteases. The structural protein C forms the icosahedral capsid of the virus and finally, the virus is enclosed by a lipid envelope that comes from the host cell [3,4,5]. The virus was primarily separated from a rhesus monkey in Uganda in 1947 [6], its first isolation from humans occurred in 1954 in Nigeria [7]. Although ZIKV prevalence has increased since 2007, it was initially discovered according to the evidence in the American continent in 2015 as an epidemic in adults, with symptoms including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), multiple organ failure, and birth defects, such as the birth of babies with neurological disorders, microcephaly, and the death of the fetus [8,9,10].
Based on phylogenetic analysis, the virus is divided into two lineages: Asian and African. According to the research, Asian lineages exhibit more genetic diversity and a greater number of single nucleotide variants in the viral genome compared to African lineages [11]. Although transmission by the Aedes mosquito is the main route of ZIKV transmission, the virus can also be transmitted through blood, vertical mother-to-child, and sexual contact [12,13,14,15,16]. Furthermore, according to studies, this virus also exists in biological body fluids such as breast milk, saliva, urine, and semen [17,18,19,20]. Different cells including peripheral dendritic cells, macrophages, various types of neurons, and placental cells are considered as ZIKV target cells [9]. After entering the body, the virus is disseminated to other parts of the body through the bloodstream [21]. According to studies, the latent period of the virus is between 3 and 12 days. However, in pregnant women, the infection may persist longer, leading to viral multiplication in the brain due to its teratogenic effects [22]. A maculopapular rash accompanied by limb edema, headache, and fever has been seen in most adults infected with the ZIKV. Also, symptoms such as thrombocytopenia, encephalitis, and meningitis are rarely seen in adults with severe disease. In addition, the ZIKV can be associated with neurological complications such as GBS [23,24,25,26]. According to the studies, no vaccine has been developed to be used by the general public. It is crucial to emphasize that, based on previous studies, no new drug has been specifically created for this virus. Instead, the treatments used have mainly been repurposed from medications originally designed for other pathogens. In addition to these drugs, antibodies are also employed as part of the treatment [27].
This study seeks to conduct an in-depth examination of ZIKV pathogenesis and its clinical manifestations by drawing on current knowledge and existing research. The objective is to not only provide a thorough understanding of the mechanisms through which ZIKV causes disease but also to analyze the range of symptoms associated with infection. By consolidating and expanding on this information, we aim to contribute valuable insights that can guide the development of more effective prevention measures and treatment strategies, ultimately improving public health responses to future ZIKV outbreaks.
Genome structure and tropism
The ZIKV is characterized as an enveloped, single-stranded RNA virus. Its genetic material contains an ORF encoding a polyprotein, which is subsequently cleaved into ten distinct proteins by both cellular and viral proteases. Among these proteins, three function as structural components: envelope (E), membrane precursor (prM), and capsid (C) proteins. The remaining seven proteins, known as nonstructural proteins (NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, and NS5), play essential roles in the replication and assembly of the virus [3,4,5, 28]. Figure 1 provides a complete illustration of the virus genome and its associated proteins.
Moreover, several well-established ZIKV receptor candidates include receptors typically linked to other flaviviruses, such as Dendritic Cell-Specific Intercellular adhesion molecule-3-Grabbing Non-integrin (DC-SIGN). Two other receptors, T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 1 (TIM-1) and the Tyro3, Axl, and Mer receptors (TAM family), are also involved. These receptors belong to the phosphatidylserine receptor family [29]. Among these receptors, TAM receptor AXL plays a major role [30]. The presence of Non-structural protein 1 (NS1) antigenemia is instrumental in the ingestion of flaviviruses by mosquitoes [31]. Based on the findings of Yang Liu et al., the existence of NS1 in the bloodstream of the infected host affects ZIKV infection in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. They found that an alanine-to-valine amino acid substitution at residue 188 in NS1 increased NS1 antigenicity, which in turn increased ZIKV’s ability to be transmitted from hosts to vectors, which could facilitate ZIKV transmission [32].
Transmission routes
Vector-borne transmission
The ZIKV can be transmitted through various ways (Fig. 2). This virus is primarily spread by mosquitoes, especially those belonging to the Aedes genus [33,34,35]. Various species of Aedes mosquitoes have been identified as potential carriers, including Aedes africanus, Aedes albopictus, Aedes hensilli, and Aedes aegypti [36]. However, Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus are regarded as significant transmitters of ZIKV [37]. ZIKV circulates in an enzootic cycle among non-human primates through mosquitoes in sylvatic environments. These infected mosquitoes can then transmit the virus to humans, creating an epidemic cycle. Additionally, the virus may enter human populations via bites from infected Aedes mosquitoes that come from regions experiencing ZIKV outbreaks or spillover from sylvatic habitats [38]. Aedes africanus is believed to be the sylvatic vector of ZIKV, while Aedes henselli has been associated with the outbreak on Yap Island. However, Aedes aegypti is considered the primary vector for outbreaks in the Americas, the Pacific, and Asia [39].
ZIKV is an arthropod-born (arbovirus) that can be transmitted through other patterns such as sexual transmission, blood transmission, etc. The vector transmission consists of two cycles: A Enzootic or sylvatic cycle; and B Human or urban cycle. ZIKV can remain stable in urine for a long time. Therefore, urine can play a role in the urban cycle [12, 38, 120,121,122,123]
Non-vector-borne transmission
There are several non-vector modes of transmission for ZIKV, such as through sexual intercourse [40,41,42,43], and from a mother to her fetus during pregnancy [44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. ZIKV might infect children through several ways, including intrauterine, intrapartum, and postnatal routes [46, 51, 52]. Instances of perinatal transmission of the ZIKV from mothers infected during childbirth have been documented, with two such cases identified. In one case, the infant showed no symptoms, while in the other case, the infant presented with a maculopapular rash and thrombocytopenia [44]. The clinical manifestations of the illness in children are strikingly like to those seen in infected adults [53]. Identifying arthralgia in newborns and young children can be challenging. Symptoms may include limping (among ambulatory children), trouble moving or reluctance to move an extremity, discomfort when moving the affected joint actively or passively, irritability, or ache upon palpation [53].
As well, the presence of ZIKV in semen and its potential for transmission through sexual contact have raised questions about its ability to breach the blood-testis barrier (BTB) or the Sertoli cell barrier (SCB). The E protein, a key antigenic component of ZIKV, is significant for its crucial role in receptor binding and membrane fusion. Numerous investigations have highlighted the significance of the E protein in the virulence and pathogenicity of ZIKV. Investigations have revealed that ZIKV infection leads to a rearrangement of actin filaments, a process in which the E protein is believed to be involved. This disruption of actin filament dynamics is a contributing factor to the ZIKV infection. In summary, the interplay between the ZIKV E protein and F-actin results in a rearrangement of the F-actin network, ultimately compromising the integrity of the BTB [54]. During the gestation period in mammals, the placenta mainly performs as a barrier, offering both physical and immunological protection between the mother and the developing fetus. Within the placenta, primary human trophoblasts (PHTs), comprising cytotrophoblasts and syncytiotrophoblasts, play a crucial role as barrier cells. Syncytiotrophoblasts are particularly significant as they are in straight interaction with maternal blood. In cases involving full-term placentas, PHTs are generally resistant to ZIKV infection because they continually release antiviral interferon lambda 1 (IFNλ1). Additionally, it was noted that the medium derived from uninfected PHT cells exhibited a protective influence against ZIKV infection in non-placental cells. PHT cells themselves displayed elevated levels of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), signifying that IFNλ1 operates both in a paracrine manner (protecting neighboring cells) and an autocrine manner (protecting trophoblast and non-trophoblast cells) to safeguard against ZIKV infection [55]. It has also been shown that trophoblast cell lines obtained from choriocarcinoma explants and early human villous explants were found to be susceptible to ZIKV infection [56]. However, placentas from later stages of pregnancy, which possess a more mature placental barrier, showed heightened resilience against infection. For ZIKV to effectively infect syncytiotrophoblasts, it likely needs to evade the protective mechanisms established by IFNλ1 produced by trophoblasts, along with other antiviral factors that are specific to trophoblasts. Alternatively, the virus may need to find alternative routes to enter the fetal compartment by breaching the placental barrier. This scenario is particularly relevant during the second half of pregnancy, which corresponds to the stage when PHT cells are most abundant. These alternative pathways might involve non-trophoblast infection routes, for instance infecting immune cells or using transcytosis to transport virions complex with maternal antibodies through the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) [57]. Recently, it has been observed that human placental macrophages, identified as Hofbauer cells (HCs), are susceptible to the virus infection [58,59,60].
In the context of immune cells, innate immune cells are probably to be targeted by ZIKV once they breach the trophoblast layer in the placenta. Upon infection, HCs manufactured IFN-α, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and also stimulated genes that are associated with antiviral responses, although it did not significantly induce cell death. ZIKV replication was also observed in human placental cytotrophoblasts, albeit with deferred kinetics and ISG expression. This suggests that ZIKV may replicate within cytotrophoblasts and HCs, potentially facilitating vertical transmission. However, syncytiotrophoblasts are resistant to ZIKV infection, leaving us with the question of how the virus penetrates the cytotrophoblast layer and HCs. Considering that significant morphological changes occur in the human placenta during the first and second half of pregnancy, including the absence of maternal blood interaction with the syncytiotrophoblast layer in the earliest trimester of pregnancy and a substantial reduction in the cytotrophoblast cell layer during pregnancy, the methods for vertical transmission of ZIKV are likely to differ in any stages of pregnancy [57]. Also, The ZIKV may be transmitted via blood transfusions and organ transplants, although the associated risks are not completely understood [61, 62].
Pathogenesis in rhesus monkey (RM)
The ZIKV was initially isolated from a febrile rhesus monkey (RM) [63], indicating that studying virus replication, immune responses, and certain characteristics of disease progression can be effectively modeled in RMs. In one particular experiment, RMs were inoculated subcutaneously to simulate a mosquito bite, which induced transient viremia and fever [64]. Moreover, another study expanded its scope by examining the tissue tropism throughout the infection. Groups of RMs were necropsied on days 7, 28, or 35 post-inoculations. Seven days following inoculation, viral RNA was found in various tissues. This included lymphoid tissues such as widely distributed lymph nodes and the spleen, joints (especially those proximal to the inoculation site, but also in some distal joint tissues), and peripheral nervous tissues, exclusively the brachial plexus, trigeminal ganglion, and sciatic nerve. Concurrently, the RNA of the virus was linked to the spinal cord (cervical, lumbar, and thoracic regions), although it was not present in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). This could suggest a predilection for nervous tissues but a limitation in the retrograde transportation of the infectious virus into the central nervous system (CNS), or it might imply that CNS infection requires a longer incubation period. RNA from the ZIKV was also identified in the kidneys and bladder of the male RM, but not in the testes or prostate. Collectively, these observations signify that ZIKV spreads rapidly to various tissues in the body, containing lymph nodes, spleen, peripheral nerves, skin, and the genital and urinary tracts. Furthermore, in the female RM, the presence of viral RNA was identified in reproductive organs for example the uterus and vagina. This indicates that these tissues can be infected by the virus and maintain the infection for a minimum of four weeks. This finding could have profound consequences for the transmission of ZIKV and the potential for fetal infections during pregnancy. Additionally, the seeding of the virus into semen via the urethra could represent another possible route of transmission [65].
Clinical observations and laboratory findings
Clinical manifestations
The ZIKV is the causative agent of Zika fever, a syndrome characterized by fever, rash, and joint pain that bears a striking resemblance to dengue fever [66]. A significant portion of individuals infected with ZIKV, especially in the period from the 1960s to the 1980s, have exhibited either no symptoms or only mild clinical signs [38]. Notably, severe illness and case fatality rates associated with ZIKV infection are remarkably low, and the symptoms of the illness typically abate within a relatively short timeframe of 2–7 days [67]. The incubation period of ZIKV infection in humans is estimated to span from 3 to 14 days [68]. Furthermore, the viremic period, characterized by the virus's existence in the bloodstream, is generally observed within 3 to 4 days after symptoms onset [69].
Evidence has indicated a connection between ZIKV infection and optical/neurological disorders, including optic nerve pallor, chorioretinal scarring, increased intraocular pressure, and corneal clouding at birth [70, 71]. It is estimated that 20–25% of people infected with ZIKV exhibit noticeable symptoms [38]. They exhibit the following symptoms: fatigue [72], arthralgia [73,74,75], temporary and moderate fever [75], accompanied by maculopapular, itchy rashes (that typically progress descendingly from the face to the extremities) [76], non-purulent conjunctivitis [77,78,79,80], and in some cases, redness of the eyes, loss of appetite, vomiting and edema [23, 38], as well as, sore throat, and cough [72, 81]. Clinical signs frequently associated with acute ZIKV infection encompass transient hearing loss [66], subcutaneous haematomas [82], myalgia, asthenia [83], headache, retro-orbital pain [23, 83, 84], and hematospermia [15, 85]. Other uncommon manifestations of ZIKV infection include mucous membrane ulceration, abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, and thrombocytopenia [86]. Figure 3 provides a detailed overview of the clinical manifestations of ZIKV and their associated neurological complications.
Neurological complications
ZIKV is also linked to neurological complications, including GBS, microcephaly [38], and neurological complications such as acute myelitis [87], and meningoencephalitis [88]. Microcephaly is a prenatal condition characterized by underdeveloped brain growth, leading to reduced head size in affected infants, while GBS manifests as muscle weakness stemming from immune-mediated harm to the peripheral nervous system [89]. During a ZIKV outbreak in Bangladesh, patients with ZIKV-associated GBS exhibited involvement of cranial, autonomic, and sensory nerves. Although electrophysiological studies predominantly confirmed most cases as acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) [90]. In Brazil, ZIKV contributed to nearly equivalent incidences of acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN) and AIDP [91]. ZIKV-associated GBS is correlated with increased morbidity in the acute phase, frequently presenting with prevalent deficits in cranial nerves and acute neuropathy [92]. Research on fetuses exposed to the ZIKV has revealed occurrences of microcephaly, retardation of intrauterine growth, and CNS damage [46, 47] (Fig. 3).
Laboratory findings
During ZIKV infection, laboratory values regarding biochemistry and hematology typically remain within normal limits. Nevertheless, during the viremic phase, a subset of patients may exhibit temporary and moderate lymphopenia, leucopenia, or activated lymphocytes. They may also experience monocytosis, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and increased serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, fibrinogen, and ferritin [83, 84, 93,94,95]. Cases of cardiac complications related to ZIKV infection include myocarditis, pericarditis, Arrhythmias, and heart failure [96,97,98]. Additionally, incidence rates of ZIKV infection are observed to be higher in females than males, and it is more common in older individuals than in younger ones [23, 99]. Due to the overlapping signs, the clinical diagnosis of Zika persists challenging in tropical settings, especially in regions with concurrent transmission of dengue and chikungunya viruses [100]. Unlike Chikungunya and Dengue fever, ZIKV is characterized by more noticeable edema of the extremities and conjunctivitis and the ZIKV does not exhibit thrombocytopenia and leukopenia as seen in Chikungunya and Dengue cases [23, 76]. Additionally, malaise and headache in ZIKV fever tend to be less severe, while the maculopapular rash is more pronounced [23]. Table 1 provides a comparison of the clinical symptoms associated with Zika, Dengue, and Chikungunya infections.
Neural dysfunction
The ZIKV disrupts the natural cell cycle and transcription processes in human neural progenitor cells (hNPC) [101]. Experimental studies have indicated that ZIKV infection leads to significant alterations in neuronal proliferation and migration. Specifically, Asian ZIKV isolates have been found to impede the growth and movement of hNP cells with less cell death. The cerebral cortex's structural development largely relies on the growth and movement of hNP cells. Subsequently, neurons in the cerebral cortex mature by extending neurites and forming synaptic connections. The cohesion of the neurite structure is crucial for the proper operation of the central nervous system (CNS). However, ZIKV infection can disrupt this process, affecting the cytoskeletal organization, microtubule dynamics, and neurite outgrowth. To assess the effect of ZIKV on neurons, researchers measured the rate of neurite growth and ramification. The High multiplicity of infections of the Asian SPH isolate of ZIKV significantly reduces neurite numbers, neurite length, and the number of branch points. Based on medical documentation of congenital ZIKV infection, ocular abnormalities, and seizures have also been documented. The observed impairment in neurite proliferation and migration is associated with seizures and cognitive deficits [102].
As well, distinct interactions between ZIKV and human proteins related to brain development contribute to the virus's influence on the nervous system. One of these interactions involves NS4A binding with Ankyrin Repeat and LEM Domain-Containing Protein 2 (ANKLE2), which is particularly intriguing [103]. Notably, mutations in ANKLE2 have been linked to autosomal recessive microcephaly in humans, as documented in previous studies [104]. These discoveries collectively imply that the expression of NS4A may hinder critical functions of ANKLE2 during brain development [103]. Although the ANKLE2 pathway plays a role in ZIKV-induced microcephaly, several developmental pathways likely collaborate to promote this condition following ZIKV infection. As an example, ZIKV RNA binds to MSI1 (Musashi-1), an RNA-binding protein responsible for regulating the microcephaly gene MCPH1, thus aiding virus replication in neural stem cells [105]. Moreover, ZIKV NS2A can impede brain development in mice by breaking down adheren junction proteins disorders in the ZIKV capsid-mediated decay pathway may also affect brain growth. Additionally, as a result of the studies that have demonstrated ZIKV NS4A and NS4B's inhibition of neural stem cells (NSC) division through the Akt-mTOR pathway, it's plausible that NS4A contributes to neuropathogenesis via several mechanisms [106].
GBS is one of the common reasons for acute neuromuscular paralysis worldwide [107]. This syndrome is an acute polyradiculoneuropathy with an immune-mediated origin and usually appears due to a preceding infection, particularly an infection caused by Campylobacter jejuni. The disease often involves sensory and cranial nerves. Respiratory failure can occur in 20–30% of GBS cases, which have severe and general manifestations [108]. The incidence of GBS varies between 0.81 and 1.89 cases per 100,000 people per year [109]. The classic form of GBS is characterized by rapid and progressive symmetric weakness in the limbs, accompanied by sensory symptoms and hyporeflexia or areflexia [110]. Various subtypes of GBS have been identified through electrophysiological studies, including Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy (AMAN), Acute Motor and Sensory Axonal Neuropathy (AMSAN), and Acute Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP) [111]. In 2014, the first report of a link between GBS and ZIKV was published, concerning a female patient with GBS in French Polynesia. Initial symptoms included distal limb paresthesia, which progressed dominant tetraparesis in the lower limbs. Other clinical symptoms included bilateral facial palsy, diffuse myalgia, and sustained ventricular tachycardia [112]. Further studies investigating ZIKV-associated GBS revealed common neurological findings such as any limb paresis (97%), areflexia or hyporeflexia (96%), tetraparesis (64%), facial palsy (51%), sensory deficits (49%), and bulbar palsy (25%) [113]. Several hypotheses exist regarding ZIKV-associated GBS. One hypothesis suggests molecular mimicry as a potential pathogenic mechanism. According to this hypothesis, the ZIKV polyprotein resembles human proteins involved in axon function, myelination, and neurodevelopment. Consequently, neutralizing antibodies induced by ZIKV may cross-react with peripheral nerve proteins, leading to immune-mediated damage [114]. Another hypothesis involves T cell responses stimulated by ZIKV, which may target neural, axonal, myelin, or Schwann cell antigens. This hypothesis is supported by the observation of perineural T-cell infiltration in nerve tissues from autopsies of GBS cases associated with other pathogens [115].
Moreover, human astrocytes, pivotal in providing support and protection to neurons, are vulnerable to ZIKV infection. Following infection, a gradual demise of human astrocytes is evident. Notably, there is an absence of indications of apoptosis or pyroptosis, effectively excluding these pathways of cell demise. Nevertheless, heightened levels of serine/threonine-protein kinase-1 (RIPK1), RIPK3, and receptor-phosphorylated protein lineage kinase-like domain (MLKL) signal the onset of planned necrosis or necroptosis in infected astrocytes [116]. Recent findings indicate that elements of the necroptosis cell death pathway might serve to constrain ZIKV neuroinfection. In particular, the activation of Z-DNA-binding protein 1 (ZBP1) and RIPK1/RIPK3 in cortical neurons can initiate a series of reactions that regulate the expression of the immune response gene 1 (IRG1) and the metabolite itaconate. Itaconate exerts a suppressive effect on viral genome replication by impeding the formation of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) [117].
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Gould E, Solomon T. Pathogenic flaviviruses. The Lancet. 2008;371(9611):500–9.
Vaziri S, Pour SH, Akrami-Mohajeri F. Zika virus as an emerging arbovirus of international public health concern. Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives. 2022;13(5):341.
Sirohi D, Chen Z, Sun L, Klose T, Pierson TC, Rossmann MG, Kuhn RJ. The 3.8 Å resolution cryo-EM structure of Zika virus. Science. 2016;352(6284):467–70.
Lee I, Bos S, Li G, Wang S, Gadea G, Desprès P, Zhao RY. Probing molecular insights into Zika virus–host interactions. Viruses. 2018;10(5):233.
Hou W, Cruz-Cosme R, Armstrong N, Obwolo LA, Wen F, Hu W, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of the genes encoding the proteins of Zika virus. Gene. 2017;628:117–28.
Dick GW, Kitchen SF, Haddow AJ. Zika virus (I). Isolations and serological specificity. Transactions of the royal society of tropical medicine and hygiene. 1952;46(5):509–20.
Macnamara F. Zika virus: a report on three cases of human infection during an epidemic of jaundice in Nigeria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1954;48(2):139–45.
Dos Santos T, Rodriguez A, Almiron M, Sanhueza A, Ramon P, de Oliveira WK, et al. Zika virus and the Guillain-Barré syndrome—case series from seven countries. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(16):1598–601.
Miner JJ, Diamond MS. Zika virus pathogenesis and tissue tropism. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;21(2):134–42.
Musso D, Gubler DJ. Zika virus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016;29(3):487–524.
Bernardo-Menezes LC, Agrelli A, Oliveira ASLEd, Moura RRd, Crovella S, Brandão LAC. An overview of Zika virus genotypes and their infectivity. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical. 2022;55:e0263–2022.
Vasilakis N, Weaver SC. Flavivirus transmission focusing on Zika. Curr Opin Virol. 2017;22:30–5.
Tabata T, Petitt M, Puerta-Guardo H, Michlmayr D, Wang C, Fang-Hoover J, et al. Zika virus targets different primary human placental cells, suggesting two routes for vertical transmission. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20(2):155–66.
Bhat EA, Ali T, Sajjad N, Bron P. Insights into the structure, functional perspective, and pathogenesis of ZIKV: an updated review. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;165: 115175.
Musso D, Roche C, Robin E, Nhan T, Teissier A, Cao-Lormeau V-M. Potential sexual transmission of Zika virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(2):359.
Musso D, Nhan T, Robin E, Roche C, Bierlaire D, Zisou K, et al. Potential for Zika virus transmission through blood transfusion demonstrated during an outbreak in French Polynesia, November 2013 to February 2014. Eurosurveillance. 2014;19(14):20761.
Regla-Nava JA, Viramontes KM, Vozdolska T, Huynh A-T, Villani T, Gardner G, et al. Detection of Zika virus in mouse mammary gland and breast milk. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(2): e0007080.
Atkinson B, Hearn P, Afrough B, Lumley S, Carter D, Aarons EJ, et al. Detection of Zika virus in semen. Emerging infectious diseases. 2016;22(5).
Musso D, Roche C, Nhan T-X, Robin E, Teissier A, Cao-Lormeau V-M. Detection of Zika virus in saliva. J Clin Virol. 2015;68:53–5.
Calvet GA, Kara EO, Bôtto-Menezes CHA, da Costa CM, de Oliveira Franca RF, Habib N, et al. Detection and persistence of Zika virus in body fluids and associated factors: a prospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):21557.
Khaiboullina SF, Ribeiro FM, Uppal T, Martynova EV, Rizvanov AA, Verma SC. Zika virus transmission through blood tissue barriers. Front Microbiol. 2019;10: 440336.
Mwaliko C, Nyaruaba R, Zhao L, Atoni E, Karungu S, Mwau M, et al. Zika virus pathogenesis and current therapeutic advances. Pathogens and Global Health. 2021;115(1):21–39.
Duffy MR, Chen T-H, Hancock WT, Powers AM, Kool JL, Lanciotti RS, et al. Zika Virus Outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(24):2536–43.
Chammard TB, Schepers K, Breurec S, Messiaen T, Destrem A-L, Mahevas M, et al. Severe thrombocytopenia after Zika virus infection, Guadeloupe, 2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(4):696.
Muñoz LS, Parra B, Pardo CA, Study NEitA. Neurological implications of Zika virus infection in adults. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2017;216(suppl_10):S897-S905.
Cao-Lormeau V-M, Blake A, Mons S, Lastère S, Roche C, Vanhomwegen J, et al. Guillain-Barré Syndrome outbreak associated with Zika virus infection in French Polynesia: a case-control study. The Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1531–9.
Gorshkov K, Shiryaev SA, Fertel S, Lin Y-W, Huang C-T, Pinto A, et al. Zika virus: origins, pathological action, and treatment strategies. Front Microbiol. 2019;9:3252.
Lindenbach BD, Rice CM. Molecular biology of flaviviruses. Adv Virus Res. 2003;59:23–62.
Perera-Lecoin M, Meertens L, Carnec X, Amara A. Flavivirus entry receptors: an update. Viruses. 2013;6(1):69–88.
Hamel R, Dejarnac O, Wichit S, Ekchariyawat P, Neyret A, Luplertlop N, et al. Biology of Zika Virus Infection in Human Skin Cells. J Virol. 2015;89(17):8880–96.
Liu J, Liu Y, Nie K, Du S, Qiu J, Pang X, et al. Flavivirus NS1 protein in infected host sera enhances viral acquisition by mosquitoes. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1(9):16087.
Liu Y, Liu J, Du S, Shan C, Nie K, Zhang R, et al. Evolutionary enhancement of Zika virus infectivity in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Nature. 2017;545(7655):482–6.
Murray JS. Understanding Zika virus. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2017;22(1).
Engel J. Of Mosquito Nets and Condoms. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016;22(4):323–5.
Ong C. Zika virus: an emerging infectious threat. Wiley Online Library; 2016. p. 525–30.
Plourde AR, Bloch EM. A literature review of Zika virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(7):1185.
Uchida L, Shibuya M, Morales-Vargas RE, Hagiwara K, Muramatsu Y. Zika virus potential vectors among Aedes mosquitoes from Hokkaido, Northern Japan: Implications for potential emergence of Zika disease. Pathogens. 2021;10(8):938.
Pielnaa P, Al-Saadawe M, Saro A, Dama MF, Zhou M, Huang Y, et al. Zika virus-spread, epidemiology, genome, transmission cycle, clinical manifestation, associated challenges, vaccine and antiviral drug development. Virology. 2020;543:34–42.
McKenzie BA, Wilson AE, Zohdy S. Aedes albopictus is a competent vector of Zika virus: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(5): e0216794.
Hills SL. Transmission of Zika virus through sexual contact with travelers to areas of ongoing transmission—continental United States, 2016. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2016;65.
Oster AM, Brooks JT, Stryker JE, Kachur RE, Mead P, Pesik NT, Petersen LR. Interim guidelines for prevention of sexual transmission of Zika virus—United States, 2016. 2016.
D’Ortenzio E, Matheron S, de Lamballerie X, Hubert B, Piorkowski G, Maquart M, et al. Evidence of sexual transmission of Zika virus. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(22):2195–8.
Deckard DT, Chung WM, Brooks JT, Smith JC, Woldai S, Hennessey M, et al. Male-to-male sexual transmission of Zika virus—Texas, January 2016. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(14):372–4.
Besnard M, Lastere S, Teissier A, Cao-Lormeau V, Musso D. Evidence of perinatal transmission of Zika virus, French Polynesia, December 2013 and February 2014. Eurosurveillance. 2014;19(13).
Brasil Martines R, Bhatnagar J, Kelly Keating M, Silva-Flannery L, Muehlenbachs A, Gary J. Evidence of zika virus infection in brain and placental tissues from two congenitally infected newborns and two fetal losses-Brazil, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(6):159–60.
Melo AO, Malinger G, Ximenes R, Szejnfeld P, Sampaio SA, De Filippis AB. Zika virus intrauterine infection causes fetal brain abnormality and microcephaly: tip of the iceberg? Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;47(1):6–7.
Mlakar J, Korva M, Tul N, Popović M, Poljšak-Prijatelj M, Mraz J, et al. Zika virus associated with microcephaly. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(10):951–8.
Calvet G, Aguiar RS, Melo AS, Sampaio SA, De Filippis I, Fabri A, et al. Detection and sequencing of Zika virus from amniotic fluid of fetuses with microcephaly in Brazil: a case study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(6):653–60.
Sarno M, Sacramento GA, Khouri R, do Rosário MS, Costa F, Archanjo G, et al. Zika virus infection and stillbirths: a case of hydrops fetalis, hydranencephaly and fetal demise. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2016;10(2):e0004517.
Meaney-Delman D, Hills SL, Williams C, Galang RR, Iyengar P, Hennenfent AK, et al. Zika virus infection among US pregnant travelers—August 2015–February 2016. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(8):211–4.
Hennessey M, Fischer M, Staples JE. Zika Virus Spreads to New Areas - Region of the Americas, May 2015-January 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(3):55–8.
Petersen EE, Staples JE, Meaney-Delman D, Fischer M, Ellington SR, Callaghan WM, Jamieson DJ. Interim Guidelines for Pregnant Women During a Zika Virus Outbreak-United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(2):30–3.
Fleming-Dutra KE, Nelson JM, Fischer MA, Staples JE, Karwowski MP, Mead PS, et al. Update: Interim Guidelines for Health Care Providers Caring for Infants and Children with Possible Zika Virus Infection-United States, February 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(7):182–7.
Nie Y, Hui L, Guo M, Yang W, Huang R, Chen J, et al. Rearrangement of Actin Cytoskeleton by Zika Virus Infection Facilitates Blood-Testis Barrier Hyperpermeability. Virol Sin. 2021;36(4):692–705.
Bayer A, Lennemann NJ, Ouyang Y, Bramley JC, Morosky S, Marques ETDA, et al. Type III interferons produced by human placental trophoblasts confer protection against Zika virus infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;19(5):705–12.
Miner JJ, Cao B, Govero J, Smith AM, Fernandez E, Cabrera OH, et al. Zika virus infection during pregnancy in mice causes placental damage and fetal demise. Cell. 2016;165(5):1081–91.
Olagnier D, Muscolini M, Coyne CB, Diamond MS, Hiscott J. Mechanisms of Zika virus infection and neuropathogenesis. DNA Cell Biol. 2016;35(8):367–72.
Rosenberg AZ, Yu W, Hill DA, Reyes CA, Schwartz DA. Placental Pathology of Zika Virus: Viral Infection of the Placenta Induces Villous Stromal Macrophage (Hofbauer Cell) Proliferation and Hyperplasia. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017;141(1):43–8.
Simoni MK, Jurado KA, Abrahams VM, Fikrig E, Guller S. Zika virus infection of Hofbauer cells. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2017;77(2).
Quicke KM, Bowen JR, Johnson EL, McDonald CE, Ma H, O’Neal JT, et al. Zika virus infects human placental macrophages. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20(1):83–90.
Motta IJ, Spencer BR, Cordeiro da Silva SG, Arruda MB, Dobbin JA, Gonzaga YB, et al. Evidence for transmission of Zika virus by platelet transfusion. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;375(11):1101–3.
Nogueira M, Estofolete C, Terzian A, do Vale EM, da Silva R, Da Silva R, et al. Zika virus infection and solid organ transplantation: a new challenge. American Journal of Transplantation. 2017;17(3):791–5.
Dick GW, Kitchen S, Haddow A. Zika virus (II). Pathogenicity and physical properties. Transactions of the royal society of tropical medicine and hygiene. 1952;46(5).
Li XF, Dong HL, Huang XY, Qiu YF, Wang HJ, Deng YQ, et al. Characterization of a 2016 Clinical Isolate of Zika Virus in Non-human Primates. EBioMedicine. 2016;12:170–7.
Hirsch AJ, Smith JL, Haese NN, Broeckel RM, Parkins CJ, Kreklywich C, et al. Zika Virus infection of rhesus macaques leads to viral persistence in multiple tissues. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(3): e1006219.
Tappe D, Nachtigall S, Kapaun A, Schnitzler P, Günther S, Schmidt-Chanasit J. Acute Zika Virus Infection after Travel to Malaysian Borneo, September 2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:911–3.
Basarab M, Bowman C, Aarons EJ, Cropley I. Zika virus. Bmj. 2016;352.
Krow-Lucal ER, Biggerstaff BJ, Staples JE. Estimated incubation period for Zika virus disease. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(5):841.
Krause KK, Azouz F, Shin OS, Kumar M. Understanding the pathogenesis of Zika virus infection using animal models. Immune network. 2017;17(5):287.
Ventura CV, Zin A, de Paula Freitas B, Ventura LO, Rocha C, Costa F, et al. Ophthalmological manifestations in congenital Zika syndrome in 469 Brazilian children. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 2021;25(3):158. e1-. e8.
Yepez JB, Murati FA, Pettito M, Peñaranda CF, de Yepez J, Maestre G, Arevalo JF. Ophthalmic manifestations of congenital Zika syndrome in Colombia and Venezuela. JAMA ophthalmology. 2017;135(5):440–5.
Heang V, Yasuda CY, Sovann L, Haddow AD, da Rosa APT, Tesh RB, Kasper MR. Zika virus infection, Cambodia, 2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18(2):349.
Petersen LR, Jamieson DJ, Powers AM, Honein MA. Zika Virus. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(16):1552–63.
Wimalasiri-Yapa B, Yapa HE, Huang X, Hafner LM, Kenna TJ, Frentiu FD. Zika virus and arthritis/arthralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Viruses. 2020;12(10):1137.
Brasil P, Pereira JP Jr, Moreira ME, Ribeiro Nogueira RM, Damasceno L, Wakimoto M, et al. Zika Virus Infection in Pregnant Women in Rio de Janeiro. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(24):2321–34.
Ioos S, Mallet H-P, Goffart IL, Gauthier V, Cardoso T, Herida M. Current Zika virus epidemiology and recent epidemics. Medecine et maladies infectieuses. 2014;44(7):302–7.
Hermann L, Thaisomboonsuk B, Rutvisuttinunt W, Klungthong C, Chinnawirotpisan P, Manasatienkij W, et al. Detection of Zika virus infection in Thailand, 2012–2014. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93(2):380.
Ventura CV, Ventura LO. Ophthalmologic manifestations associated with Zika virus infection. Pediatrics. 2018;141(Supplement_2):S161-S6.
Sahiner F, Sig AK, Savasçi Ü, Tekin K, Akay F. Zika virus-associated ocular and neurologic disorders: The emergence of new evidence. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017;36(12):e341–6.
Shinohara K, Kutsuna S, Takasaki T, Moi ML, Ikeda M, Kotaki A, et al. Zika fever imported from Thailand to Japan, and diagnosed by PCR in the urines. J Travel Med. 2016;23(1).
Loyola S, Popuche D, Rios Z, Huaman A, Ampuero JS, Guevara C. Detection of Zika Virus in Oropharyngeal Swabs from Patients with Acute Febrile Illness. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022;107(6):1242.
Karimi O, Goorhuis A, Schinkel J, Codrington J, Vreden SGS, Vermaat JS, et al. Thrombocytopenia and subcutaneous bleedings in a patient with Zika virus infection. Lancet. 2016;387(10022):939–40.
Dupont-Rouzeyrol M, O’Connor O, Calvez E, Daures M, John M, Grangeon J-P, Gourinat A-C. Co-infection with Zika and dengue viruses in 2 patients, New Caledonia, 2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(2):381.
Kutsuna S, Kato Y, Takasaki T, Moi M, Kotaki A, Uemura H, et al. Two cases of Zika fever imported from French Polynesia to Japan, December 2013 to January 2014. Eurosurveillance. 2014;19(4).
Foy BD, Kobylinski KC, Foy JLC, Blitvich BJ, da Rosa AT, Haddow AD, et al. Probable non–vector-borne transmission of Zika virus, Colorado, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(5):880.
Atif M, Azeem M, Sarwar MR, Bashir A. Zika virus disease: a current review of the literature. Infection. 2016;44(6):695–705.
Mécharles S, Herrmann C, Poullain P, Tran T, Deschamps N, Mathon G, et al. Acute myelitis due to Zika virus infection. The Lancet. 2016;387.
Carteaux G, Maquart M, Bedet A, Contou D, Brugières P, Fourati S, et al. Zika Virus Associated with Meningoencephalitis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(16):1595–6.
Sekaran SD, Ismail AA, Thergarajan G, Chandramathi S, Rahman S, Mani RR, et al. Host immune response against DENV and ZIKV infections. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12: 975222.
GeurtsvanKessel CH, Islam Z, Islam MB, Kamga S, Papri N, van de Vijver D, et al. Zika virus and Guillain-Barré syndrome in Bangladesh. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018;5(5):606–15.
Styczynski AR, Malta JM, Krow-Lucal ER, Percio J, Nóbrega ME, Vargas A, et al. Increased rates of Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with Zika virus outbreak in the Salvador metropolitan area, Brazil. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(8): e0005869.
Dirlikov E, Major CG, Medina NA, Lugo-Robles R, Matos D, Muñoz-Jordan JL, et al. Clinical Features of Guillain-Barré Syndrome With vs Without Zika Virus Infection, Puerto Rico, 2016. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(9):1089–97.
Zammarchi L, Stella G, Mantella A, Bartolozzi D, Tappe D, Günther S, et al. Zika virus infections imported to Italy: clinical, immunological and virological findings, and public health implications. J Clin Virol. 2015;63:32–5.
Wæhre T, Maagard A, Tappe D, Cadar D, Schmidt-Chanasit J. Zika virus infection after travel to Tahiti, December 2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(8):1412.
Gourinat A-C, O’Connor O, Calvez E, Goarant C, Dupont-Rouzeyrol M. Detection of Zika virus in urine. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(1):84.
Aletti M, Lecoules S, Kanczuga V, Soler C, Maquart M, Simon F, Leparc-Goffart I. Transient myocarditis associated with acute Zika virus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(5):678–9.
Waggoner JJ, Rouphael N, Xu Y, Natrajan M, Lai L, Patel SM, et al. Pericarditis Associated With Acute Zika Virus Infection in a Returning Traveler. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4(2):ofx103.
Carta KAG, Mendoza I, Morr I, Mendoza I, Misticchio F, Meza Y, et al. MYOCARDITIS, HEART FAILURE AND ARRHYTHMIAS IN PATIENTS WITH ZIKA. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017;69(11_Supplement):906-.
Lozier M, Adams L, Febo MF, Torres-Aponte J, Bello-Pagan M, Ryff KR, et al. Incidence of Zika virus disease by age and sex—Puerto Rico, November 1, 2015–October 20, 2016. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(44):1219–23.
Kutsuna S, Saito S, Ohmagari N. Simultaneous diagnosis of dengue virus, Chikungunya virus, and Zika virus infection using a new point-of-care testing (POCT) system based on the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method. J Infect Chemother. 2020;26(12):1249–53.
Gabriel E, Ramani A, Karow U, Gottardo M, Natarajan K, Gooi LM, et al. Recent Zika virus isolates induce premature differentiation of neural progenitors in human brain organoids. Cell stem cell. 2017;20(3):397–406. e5.
Goodfellow FT, Willard KA, Wu X, Scoville S, Stice SL, Brindley MA. Strain-dependent consequences of Zika virus infection and differential impact on neural development. Viruses. 2018;10(10):550.
Link N, Harnish JM, Hull B, Gibson S, Dietze M, Mgbike UE, et al. A Zika virus protein expression screen in Drosophila to investigate targeted host pathways during development. Disease Models & Mechanisms. 2024:dmm. 050297.
Sebastian WA, Shiraishi H, Shimizu N, Umeda R, Lai S, Ikeuchi M, et al. Ankle2 deficiency-associated microcephaly and spermatogenesis defects in zebrafish are alleviated by heterozygous deletion of vrk1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022;624:95–101.
Chavali PL, Stojic L, Meredith LW, Joseph N, Nahorski MS, Sanford TJ, et al. Neurodevelopmental protein Musashi-1 interacts with the Zika genome and promotes viral replication. Science. 2017;357(6346):83–8.
Liang Q, Luo Z, Zeng J, Chen W, Foo S-S, Lee S-A, et al. Zika virus NS4A and NS4B proteins deregulate Akt-mTOR signaling in human fetal neural stem cells to inhibit neurogenesis and induce autophagy. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;19(5):663–71.
Shahrizaila N, Yuki N. Guillain-Barré syndrome animal model: the first proof of molecular mimicry in human autoimmune disorder. BioMed Research International. 2011;2011.
Willison HJ, Jacobs BC, van Doorn PA. Guillain-barre syndrome. The Lancet. 2016;388(10045):717–27.
Sejvar JJ, Baughman AL, Wise M, Morgan OW. Population incidence of Guillain-Barré syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroepidemiology. 2011;36(2):123–33.
Van den Berg B, Walgaard C, Drenthen J, Fokke C, Jacobs BC, Van Doorn PA. Guillain-Barré syndrome: pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(8):469–82.
Yadegari S, Nafissi S, Kazemi N. Comparison of electrophysiological findings in axonal and demyelinating Guillain-Barre syndrome. Iranian journal of neurology. 2014;13(3):138.
Oehler E, Watrin L, Larre P, Leparc-Goffart I, Lastere S, Valour F, et al. Zika virus infection complicated by Guillain-Barre syndrome–case report, French Polynesia, December 2013. Eurosurveillance. 2014;19(9):20720.
Leonhard SE, Bresani-Salvi CC, Lyra Batista JD, Cunha S, Jacobs BC, Brito Ferreira ML, P. Militão de Albuquerque MdF. Guillain-Barré syndrome related to Zika virus infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical and electrophysiological phenotype. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2020;14(4):e0008264.
Lucchese G, Kanduc D. Zika virus and autoimmunity: from microcephaly to Guillain-Barré syndrome, and beyond. Autoimmun Rev. 2016;15(8):801–8.
Hughes RA, Cornblath DR. Guillain-barre syndrome. The Lancet. 2005;366(9497):1653–66.
Wen C, Yu Y, Gao C, Qi X, Cardona CJ, Xing Z. RIPK3-dependent necroptosis is induced and restricts viral replication in human astrocytes infected with zika virus. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11: 637710.
de Sousa JR, Azevedo RdSdS, Quaresma JAS, Vasconcelos PFdC. Cell death and Zika virus: An integrated network of the mechanisms of cell injury. Infection and Drug Resistance. 2019:2917–21.
Javed F, Manzoor KN, Ali M, Haq IU, Khan AA, Zaib A, Manzoor S. Zika virus: what we need to know? J Basic Microbiol. 2018;58(1):3–16.
Tan TY, Fibriansah G, Kostyuchenko VA, Ng T-S, Lim X-X, Zhang S, et al. Capsid protein structure in Zika virus reveals the flavivirus assembly process. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):895.
Blohm GM, Lednicky JA, Márquez M, White SK, Loeb JC, Pacheco CA, et al. Evidence for mother-to-child transmission of Zika virus through breast milk. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(7):1120–1.
Du S, Liu Y, Liu J, Zhao J, Champagne C, Tong L, et al. Aedes mosquitoes acquire and transmit Zika virus by breeding in contaminated aquatic environments. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1324.
Magnus MM, Espósito DLA, Costa VAd, Melo PSd, Costa-Lima C, Fonseca BALd, Addas-Carvalho M. Risk of Zika virus transmission by blood donations in Brazil. Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy. 2018;40:250–4.
Major CG, Paz-Bailey G, Hills SL, Rodriguez DM, Biggerstaff BJ, Johansson M. Risk estimation of sexual transmission of Zika virus—United States, 2016–2017. J Infect Dis. 2021;224(10):1756–64.
Adebayo G, Neumark Y, Gesser-Edelsburg A, Abu Ahmad W, Levine H. Zika pandemic online trends, incidence and health risk communication: a time trend study. BMJ Glob Health. 2017;2(3): e000296.
Hayes EB. Zika virus outside Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(9):1347–50.
Funding
No Funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.T, A.L: Review and Editing, Supervision. A.V. F, O.S.A, S.S, M.K, F.A, T.M, R.S: writing original draft, tables and figures, investigation, methodology. Z.T: Review and Editing. M.KH: Figures.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests:
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tajik, S., Farahani, A.V., Ardekani, O.S. et al. Zika virus tropism and pathogenesis: understanding clinical impacts and transmission dynamics. Virol J 21, 271 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-024-02547-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-024-02547-z